Olympic Steel (ZEUS) Competitors

Steel Dynamics currently has a consensus target price of $214.30, suggesting a potential downside of 9.75%. Olympic Steel has a consensus target price of $38.00, suggesting a potential downside of 20.60%. Given Steel Dynamics' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Steel Dynamics is more favorable than Olympic Steel.

Steel Dynamics pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Olympic Steel pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Steel Dynamics pays out 22.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Olympic Steel pays out 54.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Steel Dynamics has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Olympic Steel has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

82.4% of Steel Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.1% of Olympic Steel shares are held by institutional investors. 6.6% of Steel Dynamics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.8% of Olympic Steel shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 7.22% compared to Olympic Steel's net margin of 0.73%. Steel Dynamics' return on equity of 15.54% beat Olympic Steel's return on equity.

In the previous week, Steel Dynamics had 11 more articles in the media than Olympic Steel. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Steel Dynamics and 0 mentions for Olympic Steel. Steel Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Olympic Steel's score of 0.00 indicating that Steel Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Steel Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than Olympic Steel. Steel Dynamics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Olympic Steel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its share price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Olympic Steel has a beta of 1.75, meaning that its share price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 24 more articles in the media than Olympic Steel. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 0 mentions for Olympic Steel. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Olympic Steel's score of 0.00 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Carpenter Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Olympic Steel pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Carpenter Technology pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Olympic Steel pays out 54.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Olympic Steel has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Olympic Steel is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

92.0% of Carpenter Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.1% of Olympic Steel shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Carpenter Technology shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.8% of Olympic Steel shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Carpenter Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Olympic Steel. Olympic Steel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carpenter Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Olympic Steel has a beta of 1.75, suggesting that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Carpenter Technology has a net margin of 15.82% compared to Olympic Steel's net margin of 0.73%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 25.02% beat Olympic Steel's return on equity.

Carpenter Technology presently has a consensus target price of $438.78, indicating a potential downside of 1.27%. Olympic Steel has a consensus target price of $38.00, indicating a potential downside of 20.60%. Given Carpenter Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Carpenter Technology is more favorable than Olympic Steel.

ATI currently has a consensus target price of $164.38, suggesting a potential upside of 5.85%. Olympic Steel has a consensus target price of $38.00, suggesting a potential downside of 20.60%. Given ATI's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe ATI is more favorable than Olympic Steel.

87.1% of Olympic Steel shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of ATI shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.8% of Olympic Steel shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ATI has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Olympic Steel has a beta of 1.75, indicating that its share price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500.

ATI has higher revenue and earnings than Olympic Steel. Olympic Steel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ATI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, ATI had 34 more articles in the media than Olympic Steel. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for ATI and 0 mentions for Olympic Steel. ATI's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Olympic Steel's score of 0.00 indicating that ATI is being referred to more favorably in the media.

ATI has a net margin of 9.26% compared to Olympic Steel's net margin of 0.73%. ATI's return on equity of 26.44% beat Olympic Steel's return on equity.

Olympic Steel pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Reliance pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Olympic Steel pays out 54.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Reliance pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Olympic Steel has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Reliance has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Reliance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Reliance has higher revenue and earnings than Olympic Steel. Reliance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Olympic Steel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Olympic Steel has a beta of 1.75, suggesting that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Reliance has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Olympic Steel currently has a consensus price target of $38.00, indicating a potential downside of 20.60%. Reliance has a consensus price target of $344.67, indicating a potential downside of 7.38%. Given Reliance's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Reliance is more favorable than Olympic Steel.

In the previous week, Reliance had 15 more articles in the media than Olympic Steel. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Reliance and 0 mentions for Olympic Steel. Reliance's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Olympic Steel's score of 0.00 indicating that Reliance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Reliance has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Olympic Steel's net margin of 0.73%. Reliance's return on equity of 11.37% beat Olympic Steel's return on equity.

87.1% of Olympic Steel shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.3% of Reliance shares are held by institutional investors. 13.8% of Olympic Steel shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Reliance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.