NASDAQ:PLL

Piedmont Lithium Competitors

$69.30
-3.37 (-4.64 %)
(As of 04/9/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$67.77
Now: $69.30
$72.93
50-Day Range
$54.62
MA: $68.28
$81.71
52-Week Range
$5.00
Now: $69.30
$88.97
Volume851,461 shs
Average Volume1.34 million shs
Market Capitalization$1.09 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.54

Competitors

Piedmont Lithium (NASDAQ:PLL) Vs. ITW, PH, SWK, IR, DOV, and XYL

Should you be buying PLL stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "industrial machinery" are considered alternatives and competitors to Piedmont Lithium, including Illinois Tool Works (ITW), Parker-Hannifin (PH), Stanley Black & Decker (SWK), Ingersoll Rand (IR), Dover (DOV), and Xylem (XYL).

Piedmont Lithium (NASDAQ:PLL) and Illinois Tool Works (NYSE:ITW) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Piedmont Lithium and Illinois Tool Works' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Piedmont LithiumN/AN/AN/A
Illinois Tool Works16.77%80.95%14.37%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Piedmont Lithium and Illinois Tool Works, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Piedmont Lithium00403.00
Illinois Tool Works111402.19

Piedmont Lithium presently has a consensus target price of $80.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.44%. Illinois Tool Works has a consensus target price of $205.50, indicating a potential downside of 7.69%. Given Piedmont Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Piedmont Lithium is more favorable than Illinois Tool Works.

Volatility & Risk

Piedmont Lithium has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Illinois Tool Works has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its share price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.3% of Piedmont Lithium shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.4% of Illinois Tool Works shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Piedmont Lithium shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Illinois Tool Works shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Piedmont Lithium and Illinois Tool Works' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Piedmont LithiumN/AN/A$-5,670,000.00($0.68)-101.91
Illinois Tool Works$14.11 billion4.99$2.52 billion$7.7528.73

Illinois Tool Works has higher revenue and earnings than Piedmont Lithium. Piedmont Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Illinois Tool Works, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Illinois Tool Works beats Piedmont Lithium on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) and Piedmont Lithium (NASDAQ:PLL) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Parker-Hannifin and Piedmont Lithium, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Parker-Hannifin001303.00
Piedmont Lithium00403.00

Parker-Hannifin presently has a consensus price target of $306.6154, suggesting a potential downside of 4.51%. Piedmont Lithium has a consensus price target of $80.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.44%. Given Piedmont Lithium's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Piedmont Lithium is more favorable than Parker-Hannifin.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

77.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Piedmont Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Piedmont Lithium shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Parker-Hannifin and Piedmont Lithium's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Parker-Hannifin$13.70 billion3.03$1.21 billion$10.7929.76
Piedmont LithiumN/AN/A$-5,670,000.00($0.68)-101.91

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Piedmont Lithium. Piedmont Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.74, meaning that its share price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Piedmont Lithium has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Parker-Hannifin and Piedmont Lithium's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Parker-Hannifin8.75%22.77%7.13%
Piedmont LithiumN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Piedmont Lithium on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) and Piedmont Lithium (NASDAQ:PLL) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

85.4% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Piedmont Lithium shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Piedmont Lithium shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.47, indicating that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Piedmont Lithium has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Stanley Black & Decker and Piedmont Lithium's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Stanley Black & Decker$14.44 billion2.25$955.80 million$8.4024.04
Piedmont LithiumN/AN/A$-5,670,000.00($0.68)-101.91

Stanley Black & Decker has higher revenue and earnings than Piedmont Lithium. Piedmont Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stanley Black & Decker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Stanley Black & Decker and Piedmont Lithium, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Stanley Black & Decker04902.69
Piedmont Lithium00403.00

Stanley Black & Decker currently has a consensus target price of $189.3077, suggesting a potential downside of 6.24%. Piedmont Lithium has a consensus target price of $80.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.44%. Given Piedmont Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Piedmont Lithium is more favorable than Stanley Black & Decker.

Profitability

This table compares Stanley Black & Decker and Piedmont Lithium's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Stanley Black & Decker6.98%15.05%5.46%
Piedmont LithiumN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Stanley Black & Decker beats Piedmont Lithium on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) and Piedmont Lithium (NASDAQ:PLL) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ingersoll Rand and Piedmont Lithium's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ingersoll Rand$2.45 billion8.64$159.10 million$0.7666.55
Piedmont LithiumN/AN/A$-5,670,000.00($0.68)-101.91

Ingersoll Rand has higher revenue and earnings than Piedmont Lithium. Piedmont Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingersoll Rand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

95.9% of Ingersoll Rand shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Piedmont Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Ingersoll Rand shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Piedmont Lithium shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.53, suggesting that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Piedmont Lithium has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Ingersoll Rand and Piedmont Lithium, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ingersoll Rand05802.62
Piedmont Lithium00403.00

Ingersoll Rand currently has a consensus target price of $47.2308, indicating a potential downside of 6.62%. Piedmont Lithium has a consensus target price of $80.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.44%. Given Piedmont Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Piedmont Lithium is more favorable than Ingersoll Rand.

Profitability

This table compares Ingersoll Rand and Piedmont Lithium's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ingersoll Rand-3.97%-2.27%-1.25%
Piedmont LithiumN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Piedmont Lithium beats Ingersoll Rand on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dover (NYSE:DOV) and Piedmont Lithium (NASDAQ:PLL) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Dover and Piedmont Lithium's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dover$7.14 billion2.82$677.92 million$5.9323.60
Piedmont LithiumN/AN/A$-5,670,000.00($0.68)-101.91

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than Piedmont Lithium. Piedmont Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dover, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Dover has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Piedmont Lithium has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

82.7% of Dover shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Piedmont Lithium shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Dover shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Piedmont Lithium shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Dover and Piedmont Lithium's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Dover10.02%26.73%9.24%
Piedmont LithiumN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Dover and Piedmont Lithium, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Dover05402.44
Piedmont Lithium00403.00

Dover currently has a consensus target price of $128.00, indicating a potential downside of 8.55%. Piedmont Lithium has a consensus target price of $80.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.44%. Given Piedmont Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Piedmont Lithium is more favorable than Dover.

Summary

Dover beats Piedmont Lithium on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Xylem (NYSE:XYL) and Piedmont Lithium (NASDAQ:PLL) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

84.9% of Xylem shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Piedmont Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Xylem shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Piedmont Lithium shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Xylem and Piedmont Lithium's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Xylem5.09%14.72%5.44%
Piedmont LithiumN/AN/AN/A

Risk & Volatility

Xylem has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Piedmont Lithium has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Xylem and Piedmont Lithium's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Xylem$5.25 billion3.71$401 million$3.0235.76
Piedmont LithiumN/AN/A$-5,670,000.00($0.68)-101.91

Xylem has higher revenue and earnings than Piedmont Lithium. Piedmont Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xylem, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Xylem and Piedmont Lithium, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Xylem28302.08
Piedmont Lithium00403.00

Xylem currently has a consensus target price of $84.5455, suggesting a potential downside of 21.72%. Piedmont Lithium has a consensus target price of $80.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.44%. Given Piedmont Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Piedmont Lithium is more favorable than Xylem.

Summary

Xylem beats Piedmont Lithium on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


Piedmont Lithium Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Illinois Tool Works logo
ITW
Illinois Tool Works
2.5$222.63-1.9%$70.46 billion$14.11 billion33.73Analyst Report
News Coverage
Parker-Hannifin logo
PH
Parker-Hannifin
2.1$321.09-0.8%$41.45 billion$13.70 billion35.13Analyst Report
Stanley Black & Decker logo
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker
2.3$201.91-1.2%$32.49 billion$14.44 billion32.78Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Ingersoll Rand logo
IR
Ingersoll Rand
1.4$50.58-0.5%$21.18 billion$2.45 billion-136.70Analyst Report
News Coverage
Dover logo
DOV
Dover
2.1$139.96-1.0%$20.13 billion$7.14 billion30.43Analyst Report
Unusual Options Activity
Xylem logo
XYL
Xylem
1.7$108.00-2.1%$19.48 billion$5.25 billion77.70
IDEX logo
IEX
IDEX
1.8$217.42-1.0%$16.51 billion$2.49 billion44.46
Snap-on logo
SNA
Snap-on
2.3$235.59-0.5%$12.83 billion$3.73 billion22.02
Graco logo
GGG
Graco
1.8$73.40-0.8%$12.40 billion$1.65 billion42.18
Nordson logo
NDSN
Nordson
2.1$203.12-1.0%$11.80 billion$2.12 billion47.57
Pentair logo
PNR
Pentair
2.0$62.07-2.0%$10.31 billion$2.96 billion29.56Analyst Report
The Middleby logo
MIDD
The Middleby
1.4$162.58-1.4%$9.05 billion$2.96 billion34.01Analyst Revision
ITT logo
ITT
ITT
1.6$91.35-0.2%$7.90 billion$2.85 billion52.50
Woodward logo
WWD
Woodward
1.5$122.71-0.3%$7.74 billion$2.90 billion31.63Analyst Revision
Donaldson logo
DCI
Donaldson
1.9$59.66-1.4%$7.52 billion$2.58 billion30.13
Lincoln Electric logo
LECO
Lincoln Electric
2.0$122.14-1.4%$7.29 billion$3.00 billion36.35
The Timken logo
TKR
The Timken
2.4$81.51-1.7%$6.19 billion$3.79 billion18.03News Coverage
Colfax logo
CFX
Colfax
1.4$43.41-0.3%$5.87 billion$3.33 billion-868.20Analyst Downgrade
Unusual Options Activity
Rexnord logo
RXN
Rexnord
1.8$48.58-1.7%$5.84 billion$2.07 billion37.95Analyst Revision
Crane logo
CR
Crane
1.9$95.26-1.5%$5.54 billion$3.28 billion250.69
Chart Industries logo
GTLS
Chart Industries
1.2$143.91-2.0%$5.23 billion$1.30 billion82.23Gap Down
Flowserve logo
FLS
Flowserve
1.7$39.74-0.1%$5.18 billion$3.94 billion40.14
Valmont Industries logo
VMI
Valmont Industries
1.8$236.34-1.5%$5.03 billion$2.77 billion36.08News Coverage
RBC Bearings logo
ROLL
RBC Bearings
1.3$198.03-1.2%$4.98 billion$727.46 million46.05
John Bean Technologies logo
JBT
John Bean Technologies
1.5$137.02-2.2%$4.35 billion$1.95 billion36.44Gap Up
Watts Water Technologies logo
WTS
Watts Water Technologies
1.7$118.68-1.0%$3.99 billion$1.60 billion34.91
Altra Industrial Motion logo
AIMC
Altra Industrial Motion
1.4$60.80-2.2%$3.94 billion$1.83 billion-202.66Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Up
Kennametal logo
KMT
Kennametal
1.3$41.84-1.4%$3.50 billion$1.89 billion-102.05
Proto Labs logo
PRLB
Proto Labs
1.1$114.11-1.2%$3.16 billion$458.73 million54.34
ESCO Technologies logo
ESE
ESCO Technologies
1.5$111.21-0.7%$2.90 billion$732.91 million28.44News Coverage
Albany International logo
AIN
Albany International
1.5$86.66-1.1%$2.80 billion$1.05 billion28.05
SPX FLOW logo
FLOW
SPX FLOW
1.6$65.49-1.2%$2.79 billion$1.51 billion-17.14Analyst Report
Barnes Group logo
B
Barnes Group
1.8$51.12-1.0%$2.59 billion$1.49 billion30.25News Coverage
Mueller Industries logo
MLI
Mueller Industries
2.3$44.00-2.0%$2.51 billion$2.43 billion18.88News Coverage
Mueller Water Products logo
MWA
Mueller Water Products
2.1$14.36-1.3%$2.28 billion$964.10 million31.91
Kadant logo
KAI
Kadant
1.8$184.38-0.3%$2.13 billion$704.64 million44.64News Coverage
EnPro Industries logo
NPO
EnPro Industries
2.4$87.00-1.8%$1.79 billion$1.21 billion9.20Analyst Report
Omega Flex logo
OFLX
Omega Flex
0.7$152.36-1.0%$1.54 billion$111.36 million84.18Upcoming Earnings
Tennant logo
TNC
Tennant
1.6$81.19-1.1%$1.51 billion$1.14 billion35.77Insider Selling
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling logo
HY
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling
1.1$87.07-1.8%$1.46 billion$3.29 billion53.75News Coverage
Harsco logo
HSC
Harsco
1.7$17.76-1.4%$1.40 billion$1.50 billion74.00
TriMas logo
TRS
TriMas
1.1$30.83-0.6%$1.33 billion$723.53 million-20.15
Columbus McKinnon logo
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon
1.8$53.21-1.1%$1.28 billion$809.16 million72.89Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Standex International logo
SXI
Standex International
2.0$96.42-1.2%$1.19 billion$604.53 million67.90News Coverage
Energy Recovery logo
ERII
Energy Recovery
1.0$18.65-0.2%$1.06 billion$86.94 million46.63
The Gorman-Rupp logo
GRC
The Gorman-Rupp
1.1$33.64-1.2%$878.31 million$398.18 million32.66
DMC Global logo
BOOM
DMC Global
1.1$51.53-2.9%$813.81 million$397.55 million-132.12Gap Down
CIRCOR International logo
CIR
CIRCOR International
1.5$34.33-0.3%$691.92 million$964.31 million-4.04
The ExOne logo
XONE
The ExOne
1.4$29.03-0.3%$640.81 million$53.28 million-32.99
Lydall logo
LDL
Lydall
1.1$31.92-0.8%$575.33 million$837.40 million-3.83
This page was last updated on 4/10/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.