Free Trial

Omega Flex (OFLX) Competitors

Omega Flex logo
$27.06 -0.04 (-0.15%)
As of 02:27 PM Eastern

OFLX vs. GHM, HY, CMCO, ERII, and FSTR

Should you buy Omega Flex stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Omega Flex with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Omega Flex include Graham (GHM), Hyster-Yale (HY), Columbus McKinnon (CMCO), Energy Recovery (ERII), and L.B. Foster (FSTR). These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery" industry.

How does Omega Flex compare to Graham?

Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) and Graham (NYSE:GHM) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Graham has a consensus price target of $81.67, indicating a potential downside of 14.22%. Given Graham's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Graham is more favorable than Omega Flex.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Omega Flex
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Graham
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Graham has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Graham had 3 more articles in the media than Omega Flex. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Graham and 1 mentions for Omega Flex. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Graham's score of -0.68 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Omega Flex Very Positive
Graham Negative

Omega Flex has a net margin of 13.60% compared to Graham's net margin of 6.28%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat Graham's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Omega Flex13.60% 15.94% 12.92%
Graham 6.28%13.26%6.07%

36.1% of Omega Flex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.5% of Graham shares are owned by institutional investors. 65.2% of Omega Flex shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.0% of Graham shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Omega Flex has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Graham. Omega Flex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Graham, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Omega Flex$98.30M2.78$14.83M$1.3320.35
Graham$209.90M5.29$12.23M$1.3570.53

Summary

Graham beats Omega Flex on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Omega Flex compare to Hyster-Yale?

Hyster-Yale (NYSE:HY) and Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and media sentiment.

Hyster-Yale has a beta of 1.66, indicating that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Omega Flex has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Hyster-Yale pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Omega Flex pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Hyster-Yale pays out -25.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Omega Flex pays out 102.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hyster-Yale has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Omega Flex has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Omega Flex is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Omega Flex has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hyster-Yale. Hyster-Yale is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Omega Flex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hyster-Yale$3.77B0.16-$60.10M-$5.59N/A
Omega Flex$98.30M2.78$14.83M$1.3320.35

In the previous week, Hyster-Yale had 4 more articles in the media than Omega Flex. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Hyster-Yale and 1 mentions for Omega Flex. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Hyster-Yale's score of 0.63 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hyster-Yale Positive
Omega Flex Very Positive

Omega Flex has a net margin of 13.60% compared to Hyster-Yale's net margin of -2.71%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hyster-Yale-2.71% -13.96% -3.44%
Omega Flex 13.60%15.94%12.92%

46.5% of Hyster-Yale shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.1% of Omega Flex shares are held by institutional investors. 37.8% of Hyster-Yale shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 65.2% of Omega Flex shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hyster-Yale presently has a consensus target price of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 32.04%. Given Hyster-Yale's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Hyster-Yale is more favorable than Omega Flex.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hyster-Yale
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Omega Flex
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Omega Flex beats Hyster-Yale on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Omega Flex compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 2 more articles in the media than Omega Flex. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 1 mentions for Omega Flex. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.56 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Omega Flex Very Positive
Columbus McKinnon Positive

Omega Flex pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Omega Flex pays out 102.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Columbus McKinnon pays out 133.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Omega Flex has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Omega Flex is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Omega Flex has a net margin of 13.60% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of 0.60%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Omega Flex13.60% 15.94% 12.92%
Columbus McKinnon 0.60%7.41%3.82%

36.1% of Omega Flex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. 65.2% of Omega Flex shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Omega Flex has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. Omega Flex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Omega Flex$98.30M2.78$14.83M$1.3320.35
Columbus McKinnon$963.03M0.42-$5.14M$0.2167.07

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $23.50, indicating a potential upside of 66.84%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Omega Flex.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Omega Flex
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Summary

Omega Flex beats Columbus McKinnon on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Omega Flex compare to Energy Recovery?

Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) and Energy Recovery (NASDAQ:ERII) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 64.11%. Given Energy Recovery's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Energy Recovery is more favorable than Omega Flex.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Omega Flex
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Energy Recovery
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

36.1% of Omega Flex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.6% of Energy Recovery shares are held by institutional investors. 65.2% of Omega Flex shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Energy Recovery shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Energy Recovery had 9 more articles in the media than Omega Flex. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Energy Recovery and 1 mentions for Omega Flex. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Energy Recovery's score of 0.60 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Omega Flex Very Positive
Energy Recovery Positive

Energy Recovery has a net margin of 15.07% compared to Omega Flex's net margin of 13.60%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat Energy Recovery's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Omega Flex13.60% 15.94% 12.92%
Energy Recovery 15.07%10.89%9.55%

Energy Recovery has higher revenue and earnings than Omega Flex. Omega Flex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Recovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Omega Flex$98.30M2.78$14.83M$1.3320.35
Energy Recovery$134.99M3.49$22.96M$0.3824.05

Summary

Energy Recovery beats Omega Flex on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Omega Flex compare to L.B. Foster?

Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) and L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) are both small-cap industrial machinery companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

36.1% of Omega Flex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by institutional investors. 65.2% of Omega Flex shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, L.B. Foster had 2 more articles in the media than Omega Flex. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for L.B. Foster and 1 mentions for Omega Flex. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat L.B. Foster's score of 0.85 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Omega Flex Very Positive
L.B. Foster Positive

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Omega Flex has higher earnings, but lower revenue than L.B. Foster. Omega Flex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Omega Flex$98.30M2.78$14.83M$1.3320.35
L.B. Foster$540.01M0.76$7.55M$1.0338.20

Omega Flex has a net margin of 13.60% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 1.98%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Omega Flex13.60% 15.94% 12.92%
L.B. Foster 1.98%6.36%3.31%

L.B. Foster has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 18.67%. Given L.B. Foster's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe L.B. Foster is more favorable than Omega Flex.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Omega Flex
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
L.B. Foster
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Summary

Omega Flex and L.B. Foster tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Omega Flex News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OFLX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding OFLX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

OFLX vs. The Competition

MetricOmega FlexSTEEL IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$273.04M$6.92B$9.21B$12.13B
Dividend Yield5.02%2.96%3.59%5.30%
P/E Ratio20.3515.7125.0325.10
Price / Sales2.782.044,451.0769.82
Price / Cash16.9015.9727.4037.27
Price / Book3.253.674.796.60
Net Income$14.83M$416.75M$794.33M$335.32M
7 Day Performance-6.14%-2.31%-1.25%-2.06%
1 Month Performance-19.13%-0.27%0.54%-1.44%
1 Year Performance-22.60%51.00%35.38%27.53%

Omega Flex Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OFLX
Omega Flex
3.077 of 5 stars
$27.06
-0.1%
N/A-22.5%$273.04M$98.30M20.35170
GHM
Graham
2.0059 of 5 stars
$99.04
+0.7%
$81.67
-17.5%
+163.8%$1.15B$209.90M73.36490
HY
Hyster-Yale
3.8897 of 5 stars
$36.31
-0.3%
$45.00
+23.9%
-16.2%$651.74M$3.77BN/A7,500
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon
2.6057 of 5 stars
$15.47
-1.6%
$23.50
+51.9%
-19.9%$451.78M$963.03M73.673,478
ERII
Energy Recovery
4.8156 of 5 stars
$8.73
+0.3%
$15.00
+71.8%
-36.1%$448.44M$134.99M22.97250

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:OFLX) was last updated on 5/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners