Go Pro

Omega Flex (OFLX) Competitors

Omega Flex logo
$29.63 -0.25 (-0.84%)
As of 07/20/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

OFLX vs. GHM, HY, ERII, FSTR, and CMCO

Should you buy Omega Flex stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Omega Flex with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Omega Flex include Graham (GHM), Hyster-Yale (HY), Energy Recovery (ERII), L.B. Foster (FSTR), and Columbus McKinnon (CMCO). These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery" industry.

How does Omega Flex compare to Graham?

Graham (NYSE:GHM) and Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Graham has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Omega Flex has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Graham had 7 more articles in the media than Omega Flex. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Graham and 2 mentions for Omega Flex. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Graham's score of 0.06 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Graham
3 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Omega Flex
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

69.5% of Graham shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.1% of Omega Flex shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Graham shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 65.2% of Omega Flex shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Graham currently has a consensus target price of $132.50, indicating a potential upside of 26.20%. Given Graham's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Graham is more favorable than Omega Flex.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Graham
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Omega Flex
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Omega Flex has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Graham. Omega Flex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Graham, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Graham$245.29M5.02$12.50M$1.1392.91
Omega Flex$98.30M3.04$14.83M$1.3322.28

Omega Flex has a net margin of 13.60% compared to Graham's net margin of 5.10%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat Graham's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Graham5.10% 11.94% 5.40%
Omega Flex 13.60%15.94%12.92%

Summary

Graham beats Omega Flex on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Omega Flex compare to Hyster-Yale?

Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) and Hyster-Yale (NYSE:HY) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Omega Flex pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Hyster-Yale pays an annual dividend of $1.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Omega Flex pays out 102.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hyster-Yale pays out -26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Omega Flex has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Hyster-Yale has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Hyster-Yale is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hyster-Yale has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

Omega Flex has a net margin of 13.60% compared to Hyster-Yale's net margin of -2.71%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Omega Flex13.60% 15.94% 12.92%
Hyster-Yale -2.71%-13.96%-3.44%

Omega Flex has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hyster-Yale. Hyster-Yale is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Omega Flex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Omega Flex$98.30M3.04$14.83M$1.3322.28
Hyster-Yale$3.77B0.15-$60.10M-$5.59N/A

Hyster-Yale has a consensus price target of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 41.75%. Given Hyster-Yale's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hyster-Yale is more favorable than Omega Flex.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Omega Flex
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Hyster-Yale
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Omega Flex had 1 more articles in the media than Hyster-Yale. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Omega Flex and 1 mentions for Hyster-Yale. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Hyster-Yale's score of 0.00 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Omega Flex
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hyster-Yale
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

36.1% of Omega Flex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.5% of Hyster-Yale shares are held by institutional investors. 65.2% of Omega Flex shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.8% of Hyster-Yale shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Omega Flex beats Hyster-Yale on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Omega Flex compare to Energy Recovery?

Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) and Energy Recovery (NASDAQ:ERII) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Omega Flex and Omega Flex both had 2 articles in the media. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Energy Recovery's score of 0.00 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Omega Flex
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Energy Recovery
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Recovery has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

36.1% of Omega Flex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.6% of Energy Recovery shares are held by institutional investors. 65.2% of Omega Flex shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Energy Recovery shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Energy Recovery has a net margin of 15.07% compared to Omega Flex's net margin of 13.60%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat Energy Recovery's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Omega Flex13.60% 15.94% 12.92%
Energy Recovery 15.07%10.89%9.55%

Energy Recovery has higher revenue and earnings than Omega Flex. Omega Flex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Recovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Omega Flex$98.30M3.04$14.83M$1.3322.28
Energy Recovery$134.99M3.24$22.96M$0.3822.32

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 76.89%. Given Energy Recovery's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Energy Recovery is more favorable than Omega Flex.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Omega Flex
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Energy Recovery
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Energy Recovery beats Omega Flex on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Omega Flex compare to L.B. Foster?

Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) and L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) are both small-cap industrial machinery companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, Omega Flex and Omega Flex both had 2 articles in the media. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.71 equaled L.B. Foster'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Omega Flex
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
L.B. Foster
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

L.B. Foster has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 23.22%. Given L.B. Foster's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe L.B. Foster is more favorable than Omega Flex.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Omega Flex
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
L.B. Foster
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Omega Flex has higher earnings, but lower revenue than L.B. Foster. Omega Flex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Omega Flex$98.30M3.04$14.83M$1.3322.28
L.B. Foster$540.01M0.81$7.55M$1.0340.47

Omega Flex has a net margin of 13.60% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 1.98%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Omega Flex13.60% 15.94% 12.92%
L.B. Foster 1.98%6.36%3.31%

36.1% of Omega Flex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by institutional investors. 65.2% of Omega Flex shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Omega Flex and L.B. Foster tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Omega Flex compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Omega Flex has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Omega Flex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Columbus McKinnon$1.19B0.35-$229.54M-$5.48N/A
Omega Flex$98.30M3.04$14.83M$1.3322.28

Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Omega Flex pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Columbus McKinnon pays out -5.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Omega Flex pays out 102.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Omega Flex has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Omega Flex is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Omega Flex has a net margin of 13.60% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.23%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Columbus McKinnon-19.23% 7.09% 2.39%
Omega Flex 13.60%15.94%12.92%

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Omega Flex has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.1% of Omega Flex shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 65.2% of Omega Flex shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Columbus McKinnon presently has a consensus price target of $22.00, indicating a potential upside of 53.52%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Omega Flex.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Omega Flex
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 4 more articles in the media than Omega Flex. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 2 mentions for Omega Flex. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Omega Flex's score of 0.71 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Columbus McKinnon
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Omega Flex
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Columbus McKinnon and Omega Flex tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Omega Flex News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OFLX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding OFLX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

OFLX vs. The Competition

MetricOmega FlexSTEEL IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$301.62M$6.63B$9.38B$12.28B
Dividend Yield4.55%2.94%3.51%9.39%
P/E Ratio22.2815.9926.7623.94
Price / Sales3.042.021,935.2590.87
Price / Cash18.6315.8327.2647.25
Price / Book3.563.624.396.14
Net Income$14.83M$416.75M$792.80M$331.74M
7 Day Performance-0.17%-0.04%-0.17%-1.81%
1 Month Performance-4.88%-3.79%0.42%-1.44%
1 Year Performance-10.51%35.30%14.07%16.33%

Omega Flex Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OFLX
Omega Flex
1.5521 of 5 stars
$29.63
-0.8%
N/A-10.9%$301.62M$98.30M22.28170
GHM
Graham
3.7687 of 5 stars
$107.76
+4.9%
$132.50
+23.0%
+104.4%$1.20B$245.29M95.36490
HY
Hyster-Yale
2.3241 of 5 stars
$32.35
+1.0%
$45.00
+39.1%
-22.4%$573.85M$3.77BN/A7,500
ERII
Energy Recovery
3.6746 of 5 stars
$8.66
flat
$15.00
+73.2%
-37.4%$446.38M$134.99M22.79250
FSTR
L.B. Foster
2.0162 of 5 stars
$41.83
+1.2%
$32.00
-23.5%
+83.3%$432.36M$540.01M40.611,191

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:OFLX) was last updated on 7/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners