Do analysts prefer HY or OFLX?

Hyster-Yale currently has a consensus target price of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.31%. Given Hyster-Yale's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Hyster-Yale is more favorable than Omega Flex. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Hyster-Yale 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Omega Flex 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Is HY or OFLX more profitable?

Omega Flex has a net margin of 13.60% compared to Hyster-Yale's net margin of -2.71%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Hyster-Yale -2.71% -13.96% -3.44% Omega Flex 13.60% 15.94% 12.92%

Does the media refer more to HY or OFLX?

In the previous week, Omega Flex had 1 more articles in the media than Hyster-Yale. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Omega Flex and 1 mentions for Hyster-Yale. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Hyster-Yale's score of 0.25 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hyster-Yale 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Omega Flex 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer ERII or OFLX?

Energy Recovery presently has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 70.07%. Given Energy Recovery's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Energy Recovery is more favorable than Omega Flex. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energy Recovery 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Omega Flex 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has better earnings & valuation, ERII or OFLX?

Energy Recovery has higher revenue and earnings than Omega Flex. Energy Recovery is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Omega Flex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Energy Recovery $136.63M 3.33 $22.96M $0.38 23.21 Omega Flex $98.30M 3.25 $14.83M $1.33 23.84

Does the media refer more to ERII or OFLX?

In the previous week, Energy Recovery and Energy Recovery both had 2 articles in the media. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Energy Recovery's score of 0.83 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energy Recovery 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Omega Flex 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend OFLX or FSTR?

L.B. Foster has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 28.35%. Given L.B. Foster's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe L.B. Foster is more favorable than Omega Flex. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Omega Flex 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 L.B. Foster 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, OFLX or FSTR?

Omega Flex has higher earnings, but lower revenue than L.B. Foster. Omega Flex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Omega Flex $98.30M 3.25 $14.83M $1.33 23.84 L.B. Foster $540.01M 0.87 $7.55M $1.03 43.36

Is OFLX or FSTR more profitable?

Omega Flex has a net margin of 13.60% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 1.98%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Omega Flex 13.60% 15.94% 12.92% L.B. Foster 1.98% 6.36% 3.31%

Does the media refer more to OFLX or FSTR?

In the previous week, L.B. Foster had 2 more articles in the media than Omega Flex. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for L.B. Foster and 2 mentions for Omega Flex. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat L.B. Foster's score of 0.50 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Omega Flex 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive L.B. Foster 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer OFLX or CMCO?

Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $22.00, suggesting a potential upside of 52.19%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Omega Flex. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Omega Flex 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Columbus McKinnon 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 2 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.80

Does the media prefer OFLX or CMCO?

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 2 more articles in the media than Omega Flex. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 2 mentions for Omega Flex. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.84 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Omega Flex 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Columbus McKinnon 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend OFLX or AP?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Omega Flex 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Does the media refer more to OFLX or AP?

In the previous week, Ampco-Pittsburgh had 2 more articles in the media than Omega Flex. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh and 2 mentions for Omega Flex. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's score of -0.52 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Omega Flex 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative

Omega Flex (OFLX) Competitors

$31.71 +0.23 (+0.73%)

As of 06/26/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

OFLX vs. HY, ERII, FSTR, CMCO, and AP

Should you buy Omega Flex stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Omega Flex with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Omega Flex include Hyster-Yale (HY), Energy Recovery (ERII), L.B. Foster (FSTR), Columbus McKinnon (CMCO), and Ampco-Pittsburgh (AP). These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery" industry.

How does Omega Flex compare to Hyster-Yale?

Hyster-Yale (NYSE:HY) and Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

46.5% of Hyster-Yale shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.1% of Omega Flex shares are owned by institutional investors. 37.8% of Hyster-Yale shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 65.2% of Omega Flex shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Omega Flex has a net margin of 13.60% compared to Hyster-Yale's net margin of -2.71%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hyster-Yale	-2.71%	-13.96%	-3.44%
Omega Flex	13.60%	15.94%	12.92%

In the previous week, Omega Flex had 1 more articles in the media than Hyster-Yale. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Omega Flex and 1 mentions for Hyster-Yale. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Hyster-Yale's score of 0.25 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hyster-Yale	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Omega Flex	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Omega Flex has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hyster-Yale. Hyster-Yale is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Omega Flex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hyster-Yale	$3.77B	0.17	-$60.10M	-$5.59	N/A
Omega Flex	$98.30M	3.25	$14.83M	$1.33	23.84

Hyster-Yale currently has a consensus target price of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.31%. Given Hyster-Yale's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Hyster-Yale is more favorable than Omega Flex.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hyster-Yale	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Omega Flex	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Hyster-Yale has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Omega Flex has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Hyster-Yale pays an annual dividend of $1.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Omega Flex pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Hyster-Yale pays out -26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Omega Flex pays out 102.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hyster-Yale has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Omega Flex has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Omega Flex is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Omega Flex beats Hyster-Yale on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Omega Flex compare to Energy Recovery?

Energy Recovery (NASDAQ:ERII) and Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and dividends.

83.6% of Energy Recovery shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.1% of Omega Flex shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.2% of Energy Recovery shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 65.2% of Omega Flex shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Energy Recovery has higher revenue and earnings than Omega Flex. Energy Recovery is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Omega Flex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energy Recovery	$136.63M	3.33	$22.96M	$0.38	23.21
Omega Flex	$98.30M	3.25	$14.83M	$1.33	23.84

Energy Recovery presently has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 70.07%. Given Energy Recovery's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Energy Recovery is more favorable than Omega Flex.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energy Recovery	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Omega Flex	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Energy Recovery has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Omega Flex has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Energy Recovery and Energy Recovery both had 2 articles in the media. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Energy Recovery's score of 0.83 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energy Recovery	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Omega Flex	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Energy Recovery has a net margin of 15.07% compared to Omega Flex's net margin of 13.60%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat Energy Recovery's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energy Recovery	15.07%	10.89%	9.55%
Omega Flex	13.60%	15.94%	12.92%

Summary

Energy Recovery beats Omega Flex on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Omega Flex compare to L.B. Foster?

Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) and L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) are both small-cap industrial machinery companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

36.1% of Omega Flex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are owned by institutional investors. 65.2% of Omega Flex shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

L.B. Foster has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 28.35%. Given L.B. Foster's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe L.B. Foster is more favorable than Omega Flex.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Omega Flex	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
L.B. Foster	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

In the previous week, L.B. Foster had 2 more articles in the media than Omega Flex. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for L.B. Foster and 2 mentions for Omega Flex. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat L.B. Foster's score of 0.50 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Omega Flex	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
L.B. Foster	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Omega Flex has higher earnings, but lower revenue than L.B. Foster. Omega Flex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Omega Flex	$98.30M	3.25	$14.83M	$1.33	23.84
L.B. Foster	$540.01M	0.87	$7.55M	$1.03	43.36

Omega Flex has a net margin of 13.60% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 1.98%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Omega Flex	13.60%	15.94%	12.92%
L.B. Foster	1.98%	6.36%	3.31%

Summary

L.B. Foster beats Omega Flex on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Omega Flex compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

Omega Flex pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Omega Flex pays out 102.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Columbus McKinnon pays out -5.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Omega Flex has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Omega Flex is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $22.00, suggesting a potential upside of 52.19%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Omega Flex.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Omega Flex	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Omega Flex has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Omega Flex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Omega Flex	$98.30M	3.25	$14.83M	$1.33	23.84
Columbus McKinnon	$1.19B	0.35	-$229.54M	-$5.48	N/A

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 2 more articles in the media than Omega Flex. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 2 mentions for Omega Flex. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.84 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Omega Flex	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Columbus McKinnon	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

36.1% of Omega Flex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 65.2% of Omega Flex shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Omega Flex has a net margin of 13.60% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.23%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Omega Flex	13.60%	15.94%	12.92%
Columbus McKinnon	-19.23%	7.09%	2.39%

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Omega Flex beats Columbus McKinnon on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Omega Flex compare to Ampco-Pittsburgh?

Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) and Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

36.1% of Omega Flex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by institutional investors. 65.2% of Omega Flex shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Omega Flex	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Omega Flex has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Omega Flex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Omega Flex	$98.30M	3.25	$14.83M	$1.33	23.84
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.44	-$66.07M	-$3.36	N/A

In the previous week, Ampco-Pittsburgh had 2 more articles in the media than Omega Flex. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh and 2 mentions for Omega Flex. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's score of -0.52 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Omega Flex	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

Omega Flex has a net margin of 13.60% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -15.53%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Omega Flex	13.60%	15.94%	12.92%
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-15.53%	-7.56%	-0.91%

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Omega Flex beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Omega Flex News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding OFLX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

OFLX vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Omega Flex	STEEL Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$320.08M	$6.68B	$9.47B	$12.18B
Dividend Yield	4.29%	2.87%	3.53%	6.24%
P/E Ratio	23.84	16.85	25.62	24.17
Price / Sales	3.25	2.13	4,851.70	118.47
Price / Cash	19.77	16.63	28.09	55.62
Price / Book	3.81	3.86	4.58	6.36
Net Income	$14.83M	$416.75M	$792.16M	$337.99M
7 Day Performance	1.80%	-0.52%	0.13%	0.10%
1 Month Performance	2.32%	1.54%	-1.03%	-1.28%
1 Year Performance	-7.77%	41.23%	21.06%	27.68%

Omega Flex Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
OFLX Omega Flex	1.683 of 5 stars	$31.71 +0.7%	N/A	-7.8%	$320.08M	$98.30M	23.84	170	Ex-Dividend High Trading Volume
HY Hyster-Yale	3.5858 of 5 stars	$36.71 -4.7%	$45.00 +22.6%	-10.5%	$690.48M	$3.77B	N/A	7,500	News Coverage
ERII Energy Recovery	4.2863 of 5 stars	$8.86 -0.4%	$15.00 +69.3%	-30.1%	$458.75M	$134.99M	23.32	250	Analyst Downgrade
FSTR L.B. Foster	2.5036 of 5 stars	$43.92 +0.4%	$32.00 -27.1%	+102.0%	$457.58M	$563.36M	42.64	1,191	Short Interest Increase Analyst Revision
CMCO Columbus McKinnon	4.5584 of 5 stars	$14.04 -3.5%	$22.00 +56.7%	-6.3%	$419.45M	$1.19B	N/A	7,300

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:OFLX) was last updated on 6/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Omega Flex (OFLX) Competitors

OFLX vs. HY, ERII, FSTR, CMCO, and AP

How does Omega Flex compare to Hyster-Yale?

Summary

How does Omega Flex compare to Energy Recovery?

Summary

How does Omega Flex compare to L.B. Foster?

Summary

How does Omega Flex compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Summary

How does Omega Flex compare to Ampco-Pittsburgh?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

OFLX vs. The Competition

Omega Flex Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Omega Flex (OFLX) Competitors

OFLX vs. HY, ERII, FSTR, CMCO, and AP

How does Omega Flex compare to Hyster-Yale?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of HY or OFLX?

Is HY or OFLX more profitable?

Does the media refer more to HY or OFLX?

Which has better earnings & valuation, HY or OFLX?

Do analysts prefer HY or OFLX?

Which has more volatility & risk, HY or OFLX?

Is HY or OFLX a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Omega Flex compare to Energy Recovery?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in ERII or OFLX?

Which has better earnings & valuation, ERII or OFLX?

Do analysts prefer ERII or OFLX?

Which has more risk & volatility, ERII or OFLX?

Does the media refer more to ERII or OFLX?

Is ERII or OFLX more profitable?

Summary

How does Omega Flex compare to L.B. Foster?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in OFLX or FSTR?

Which has more risk & volatility, OFLX or FSTR?

Do analysts recommend OFLX or FSTR?

Does the media refer more to OFLX or FSTR?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, OFLX or FSTR?

Is OFLX or FSTR more profitable?

Summary

How does Omega Flex compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Is OFLX or CMCO a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer OFLX or CMCO?

Which has better earnings & valuation, OFLX or CMCO?

Does the media prefer OFLX or CMCO?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in OFLX or CMCO?

Is OFLX or CMCO more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, OFLX or CMCO?

Summary

How does Omega Flex compare to Ampco-Pittsburgh?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of OFLX or AP?

Do analysts recommend OFLX or AP?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, OFLX or AP?

Does the media refer more to OFLX or AP?

Is OFLX or AP more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, OFLX or AP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

OFLX vs. The Competition

Omega Flex Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools