NYSE:AP

Ampco-Pittsburgh Competitors

$6.93
+0.17 (+2.51 %)
(As of 04/14/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$6.80
Now: $6.93
$7.20
50-Day Range
$6.61
MA: $7.43
$8.36
52-Week Range
$2.70
Now: $6.93
$8.81
Volume31,949 shs
Average Volume100,695 shs
Market Capitalization$130.62 million
P/E Ratio10.04
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.15

Competitors

Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) Vs. ITW, PH, SWK, IR, DOV, and XYL

Should you be buying AP stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "industrial machinery" are considered alternatives and competitors to Ampco-Pittsburgh, including Illinois Tool Works (ITW), Parker-Hannifin (PH), Stanley Black & Decker (SWK), Ingersoll Rand (IR), Dover (DOV), and Xylem (XYL).

Illinois Tool Works (NYSE:ITW) and Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Illinois Tool Works and Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Illinois Tool Works16.77%80.95%14.37%
Ampco-Pittsburgh2.62%11.12%1.48%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Illinois Tool Works and Ampco-Pittsburgh's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Illinois Tool Works$14.11 billion4.97$2.52 billion$7.7528.60
Ampco-Pittsburgh$397.90 million0.33$-20,990,000.00$0.3718.73

Illinois Tool Works has higher revenue and earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Illinois Tool Works, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

77.4% of Illinois Tool Works shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Illinois Tool Works shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Illinois Tool Works and Ampco-Pittsburgh, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Illinois Tool Works111402.19
Ampco-Pittsburgh0000N/A

Illinois Tool Works presently has a consensus target price of $210.1250, indicating a potential downside of 5.19%. Given Illinois Tool Works' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Illinois Tool Works is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Volatility and Risk

Illinois Tool Works has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Illinois Tool Works beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) and Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Parker-Hannifin and Ampco-Pittsburgh, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Parker-Hannifin011302.93
Ampco-Pittsburgh0000N/A

Parker-Hannifin currently has a consensus target price of $310.6429, suggesting a potential downside of 2.21%. Given Parker-Hannifin's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Parker-Hannifin is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Parker-Hannifin and Ampco-Pittsburgh's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Parker-Hannifin$13.70 billion2.99$1.21 billion$10.7929.44
Ampco-Pittsburgh$397.90 million0.33$-20,990,000.00$0.3718.73

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Parker-Hannifin and Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Parker-Hannifin8.75%22.77%7.13%
Ampco-Pittsburgh2.62%11.12%1.48%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.74, suggesting that its share price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) and Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Risk & Volatility

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Ampco-Pittsburgh and Stanley Black & Decker, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ampco-Pittsburgh0000N/A
Stanley Black & Decker04902.69

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus target price of $191.1538, suggesting a potential downside of 5.10%. Given Stanley Black & Decker's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Stanley Black & Decker is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

60.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.3% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Ampco-Pittsburgh and Stanley Black & Decker's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ampco-Pittsburgh2.62%11.12%1.48%
Stanley Black & Decker6.98%15.05%5.46%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ampco-Pittsburgh and Stanley Black & Decker's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ampco-Pittsburgh$397.90 million0.33$-20,990,000.00$0.3718.73
Stanley Black & Decker$14.44 billion2.24$955.80 million$8.4023.98

Stanley Black & Decker has higher revenue and earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stanley Black & Decker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Stanley Black & Decker beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) and Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.53, suggesting that its share price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

60.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.9% of Ingersoll Rand shares are held by institutional investors. 14.3% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Ingersoll Rand shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ampco-Pittsburgh and Ingersoll Rand's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ampco-Pittsburgh$397.90 million0.33$-20,990,000.00$0.3718.73
Ingersoll Rand$2.45 billion8.44$159.10 million$0.7665.00

Ingersoll Rand has higher revenue and earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingersoll Rand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Ampco-Pittsburgh and Ingersoll Rand, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ampco-Pittsburgh0000N/A
Ingersoll Rand04702.64

Ingersoll Rand has a consensus target price of $50.0909, suggesting a potential upside of 1.40%. Given Ingersoll Rand's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ingersoll Rand is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Profitability

This table compares Ampco-Pittsburgh and Ingersoll Rand's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ampco-Pittsburgh2.62%11.12%1.48%
Ingersoll Rand-3.97%-2.27%-1.25%

Summary

Ingersoll Rand beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) and Dover (NYSE:DOV) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Ampco-Pittsburgh and Dover's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ampco-Pittsburgh2.62%11.12%1.48%
Dover10.02%26.73%9.24%

Volatility & Risk

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dover has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

60.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of Dover shares are held by institutional investors. 14.3% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Dover shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ampco-Pittsburgh and Dover's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ampco-Pittsburgh$397.90 million0.33$-20,990,000.00$0.3718.73
Dover$7.14 billion2.79$677.92 million$5.9323.32

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dover, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Ampco-Pittsburgh and Dover, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ampco-Pittsburgh0000N/A
Dover05402.44

Dover has a consensus price target of $132.25, indicating a potential downside of 4.37%. Given Dover's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Dover is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Summary

Dover beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Xylem (NYSE:XYL) and Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Xylem and Ampco-Pittsburgh's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Xylem$5.25 billion3.70$401 million$3.0235.70
Ampco-Pittsburgh$397.90 million0.33$-20,990,000.00$0.3718.73

Xylem has higher revenue and earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xylem, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Xylem and Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Xylem5.09%14.72%5.44%
Ampco-Pittsburgh2.62%11.12%1.48%

Volatility & Risk

Xylem has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Xylem and Ampco-Pittsburgh, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Xylem28302.08
Ampco-Pittsburgh0000N/A

Xylem currently has a consensus price target of $84.5455, indicating a potential downside of 21.57%. Given Xylem's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Xylem is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

84.9% of Xylem shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Xylem shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Xylem beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


Ampco-Pittsburgh Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Illinois Tool Works logo
ITW
Illinois Tool Works
2.5$221.62+0.1%$70.14 billion$14.11 billion33.58Analyst Report
Parker-Hannifin logo
PH
Parker-Hannifin
2.1$317.67+0.6%$41.01 billion$13.70 billion34.76Analyst Report
Stanley Black & Decker logo
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker
2.3$201.43+0.5%$32.41 billion$14.44 billion32.70Analyst Report
Ingersoll Rand logo
IR
Ingersoll Rand
1.4$49.40+0.3%$20.69 billion$2.45 billion-133.51Analyst Report
Dover logo
DOV
Dover
2.1$138.30+0.3%$19.90 billion$7.14 billion30.07Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Xylem logo
XYL
Xylem
1.7$107.80+0.6%$19.44 billion$5.25 billion77.55Increase in Short Interest
IDEX logo
IEX
IDEX
1.8$215.47+0.5%$16.36 billion$2.49 billion44.06
Snap-on logo
SNA
Snap-on
2.3$233.25+0.1%$12.70 billion$3.73 billion21.80Upcoming Earnings
Insider Selling
Graco logo
GGG
Graco
1.8$73.38+0.1%$12.39 billion$1.65 billion42.17Upcoming Earnings
Nordson logo
NDSN
Nordson
2.1$203.47+0.8%$11.82 billion$2.12 billion47.65Decrease in Short Interest
Pentair logo
PNR
Pentair
2.0$62.27+0.1%$10.34 billion$2.96 billion29.65Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
The Middleby logo
MIDD
The Middleby
1.4$164.01+0.1%$9.13 billion$2.96 billion34.31Analyst Revision
ITT logo
ITT
ITT
1.6$91.71+0.6%$7.93 billion$2.85 billion52.71Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Woodward logo
WWD
Woodward
1.5$122.29+0.4%$7.71 billion$2.90 billion31.52Analyst Revision
Donaldson logo
DCI
Donaldson
1.9$59.56+0.5%$7.51 billion$2.58 billion30.08Analyst Report
Lincoln Electric logo
LECO
Lincoln Electric
2.0$122.58+1.9%$7.31 billion$3.00 billion36.48Analyst Report
The Timken logo
TKR
The Timken
2.2$80.66+0.9%$6.13 billion$3.79 billion17.85Analyst Report
Colfax logo
CFX
Colfax
1.4$44.06+2.5%$5.96 billion$3.33 billion-881.20Analyst Report
Rexnord logo
RXN
Rexnord
1.8$48.42+0.3%$5.82 billion$2.07 billion37.83Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Crane logo
CR
Crane
1.9$94.58+0.3%$5.50 billion$3.28 billion248.90
Chart Industries logo
GTLS
Chart Industries
1.2$142.90+0.4%$5.19 billion$1.30 billion81.66Upcoming Earnings
Flowserve logo
FLS
Flowserve
1.7$39.68+1.8%$5.17 billion$3.94 billion40.08
Valmont Industries logo
VMI
Valmont Industries
1.8$235.06+1.0%$5.00 billion$2.77 billion35.89Upcoming Earnings
RBC Bearings logo
ROLL
RBC Bearings
1.3$195.16+0.8%$4.91 billion$727.46 million45.39
John Bean Technologies logo
JBT
John Bean Technologies
1.5$135.13+0.8%$4.29 billion$1.95 billion35.94Analyst Report
News Coverage
Watts Water Technologies logo
WTS
Watts Water Technologies
1.7$118.61+0.4%$3.99 billion$1.60 billion34.89
Altra Industrial Motion logo
AIMC
Altra Industrial Motion
1.4$61.06+0.6%$3.96 billion$1.83 billion-203.53
Kennametal logo
KMT
Kennametal
1.3$42.04+1.2%$3.51 billion$1.89 billion-102.54Analyst Report
News Coverage
Proto Labs logo
PRLB
Proto Labs
1.1$108.83+1.9%$3.01 billion$458.73 million51.82
ESCO Technologies logo
ESE
ESCO Technologies
1.5$110.12+0.7%$2.87 billion$732.91 million28.16Analyst Upgrade
Albany International logo
AIN
Albany International
1.5$86.65+1.5%$2.80 billion$1.05 billion28.04
SPX FLOW logo
FLOW
SPX FLOW
1.6$64.79+1.0%$2.76 billion$1.51 billion-16.96News Coverage
Barnes Group logo
B
Barnes Group
1.8$50.61+0.8%$2.56 billion$1.49 billion29.95News Coverage
Mueller Industries logo
MLI
Mueller Industries
2.3$44.41+1.4%$2.54 billion$2.43 billion19.06Upcoming Earnings
Insider Selling
Mueller Water Products logo
MWA
Mueller Water Products
2.0$14.16+1.1%$2.24 billion$964.10 million31.47
Kadant logo
KAI
Kadant
1.8$180.53+0.3%$2.09 billion$704.64 million43.71News Coverage
EnPro Industries logo
NPO
EnPro Industries
2.4$87.02+0.7%$1.79 billion$1.21 billion9.20
Tennant logo
TNC
Tennant
1.6$81.49+0.1%$1.51 billion$1.14 billion35.90
Omega Flex logo
OFLX
Omega Flex
0.7$146.85+1.5%$1.48 billion$111.36 million81.13Decrease in Short Interest
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling logo
HY
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling
1.1$85.77+1.9%$1.44 billion$3.29 billion52.94
Harsco logo
HSC
Harsco
1.7$18.15+3.4%$1.43 billion$1.50 billion75.63
TriMas logo
TRS
TriMas
1.1$30.98+1.9%$1.34 billion$723.53 million-20.25
Columbus McKinnon logo
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon
1.8$52.82+1.1%$1.27 billion$809.16 million72.36
Standex International logo
SXI
Standex International
2.0$95.65+1.1%$1.18 billion$604.53 million67.36Decrease in Short Interest
Piedmont Lithium logo
PLL
Piedmont Lithium
0.9$68.00+2.2%$1.07 billionN/A-100.00Analyst Downgrade
Energy Recovery logo
ERII
Energy Recovery
1.0$18.50+1.4%$1.06 billion$86.94 million46.25
DMC Global logo
BOOM
DMC Global
1.1$56.98+8.8%$899.89 million$397.55 million-146.10Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
The Gorman-Rupp logo
GRC
The Gorman-Rupp
1.1$33.42+0.1%$872.56 million$398.18 million32.45Upcoming Earnings
CIRCOR International logo
CIR
CIRCOR International
1.5$33.68+1.9%$678.82 million$964.31 million-3.97Unusual Options Activity
The ExOne logo
XONE
The ExOne
1.4$26.72+2.9%$589.82 million$53.28 million-30.36
This page was last updated on 4/15/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.