Do analysts rate AP or HY?

Hyster-Yale has a consensus price target of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 42.11%. Given Hyster-Yale's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hyster-Yale is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Hyster-Yale 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25

Does the media prefer AP or HY?

In the previous week, Hyster-Yale had 4 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Hyster-Yale and 2 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Hyster-Yale's score of 0.38 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hyster-Yale 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer AP or DDD?

3D Systems has a consensus target price of $5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 51.10%. Given 3D Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe 3D Systems is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 3D Systems 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.40

Does the media favor AP or DDD?

In the previous week, 3D Systems had 2 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for 3D Systems and 2 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat 3D Systems' score of 0.65 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive 3D Systems 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer CMCO or AP?

Columbus McKinnon presently has a consensus target price of $23.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.94%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Columbus McKinnon 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 2 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.80 Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Does the media favor CMCO or AP?

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 1 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 2 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.71 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Columbus McKinnon 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer AP or LXFR?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Luxfer 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Does the media prefer AP or LXFR?

In the previous week, Ampco-Pittsburgh had 1 more articles in the media than Luxfer. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh and 1 mentions for Luxfer. Luxfer's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's score of 0.77 indicating that Luxfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Luxfer 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Do analysts recommend AP or MEC?

Mayville Engineering has a consensus price target of $35.75, suggesting a potential upside of 108.82%. Given Mayville Engineering's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Mayville Engineering is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Mayville Engineering 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Does the media refer more to AP or MEC?

In the previous week, Mayville Engineering had 2 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Mayville Engineering and 2 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Mayville Engineering's score of 0.50 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Mayville Engineering 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Ampco-Pittsburgh (AP) Competitors

$8.33 -0.17 (-2.00%)

Closing price 09/18/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$8.37 +0.04 (+0.48%)

As of 09/18/2026 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

AP vs. HY, DDD, CMCO, LXFR, and MEC

Should you buy Ampco-Pittsburgh stock or one of its competitors? Ampco-Pittsburgh's main competitors and comparable companies include Hyster-Yale (HY), 3D Systems (DDD), Columbus McKinnon (CMCO), Luxfer (LXFR), and Mayville Engineering (MEC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Hyster-Yale?

Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) and Hyster-Yale (NYSE:HY) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Hyster-Yale has higher revenue and earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Hyster-Yale is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ampco-Pittsburgh, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.40	-$66.07M	-$2.93	N/A
Hyster-Yale	$3.77B	0.16	-$60.10M	-$6.56	N/A

In the previous week, Hyster-Yale had 4 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Hyster-Yale and 2 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Hyster-Yale's score of 0.38 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hyster-Yale	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Hyster-Yale has a consensus price target of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 42.11%. Given Hyster-Yale's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hyster-Yale is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Hyster-Yale	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Hyster-Yale has a net margin of -3.33% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -13.84%. Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity of -3.53% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-13.84%	-3.53%	-0.38%
Hyster-Yale	-3.33%	-21.03%	-4.87%

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hyster-Yale has a beta of 1.65, suggesting that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market.

49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.5% of Hyster-Yale shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.8% of Hyster-Yale shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Hyster-Yale beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to 3D Systems?

Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) and 3D Systems (NYSE:DDD) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

3D Systems has a consensus target price of $5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 51.10%. Given 3D Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe 3D Systems is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
3D Systems	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a net margin of -13.84% compared to 3D Systems' net margin of -14.15%. Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity of -3.53% beat 3D Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-13.84%	-3.53%	-0.38%
3D Systems	-14.15%	-19.56%	-8.92%

3D Systems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. 3D Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ampco-Pittsburgh, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.40	-$66.07M	-$2.93	N/A
3D Systems	$386.90M	1.56	$29.88M	-$0.41	N/A

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3D Systems has a beta of 2.75, suggesting that its stock price is 175% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, 3D Systems had 2 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for 3D Systems and 2 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat 3D Systems' score of 0.65 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
3D Systems	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.5% of 3D Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of 3D Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

3D Systems beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Ampco-Pittsburgh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Columbus McKinnon	$1.19B	0.38	-$229.54M	-$7.46	N/A
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.40	-$66.07M	-$2.93	N/A

Columbus McKinnon presently has a consensus target price of $23.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.94%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 1 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 2 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.71 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Columbus McKinnon	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a net margin of -13.84% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -21.25%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 10.02% beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Columbus McKinnon	-21.25%	10.02%	2.36%
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-13.84%	-3.53%	-0.38%

Summary

Columbus McKinnon beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Luxfer?

Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) and Luxfer (NYSE:LXFR) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Luxfer has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luxfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.40	-$66.07M	-$2.93	N/A
Luxfer	$384.60M	1.20	$7.70M	$0.30	57.48

Luxfer has a net margin of 2.20% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -13.84%. Luxfer's return on equity of 12.22% beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-13.84%	-3.53%	-0.38%
Luxfer	2.20%	12.22%	7.23%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Luxfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Luxfer shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Luxfer shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ampco-Pittsburgh had 1 more articles in the media than Luxfer. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh and 1 mentions for Luxfer. Luxfer's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's score of 0.77 indicating that Luxfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Luxfer	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Luxfer has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Luxfer beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Mayville Engineering?

Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) and Mayville Engineering (NYSE:MEC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.4% of Mayville Engineering shares are held by institutional investors. 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Mayville Engineering shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Mayville Engineering has a consensus price target of $35.75, suggesting a potential upside of 108.82%. Given Mayville Engineering's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Mayville Engineering is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Mayville Engineering	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Mayville Engineering has higher revenue and earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Mayville Engineering is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ampco-Pittsburgh, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.40	-$66.07M	-$2.93	N/A
Mayville Engineering	$546.49M	0.80	-$8.11M	-$0.84	N/A

Mayville Engineering has a net margin of -2.95% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -13.84%. Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity of -3.53% beat Mayville Engineering's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-13.84%	-3.53%	-0.38%
Mayville Engineering	-2.95%	-6.63%	-2.99%

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mayville Engineering has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Mayville Engineering had 2 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Mayville Engineering and 2 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Mayville Engineering's score of 0.50 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Mayville Engineering	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Mayville Engineering beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ampco-Pittsburgh News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Ampco-Pittsburgh	Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$172.50M	$11.08B	$10.21B	$23.10B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.28%	97.05%	3.62%
P/E Ratio	-2.84	21.34	25.52	28.19
Price / Sales	0.40	63.04	281.56	20.34
Price / Cash	8.90	22.82	23.81	36.36
Price / Book	3.53	4.25	4.80	4.67
Net Income	-$66.07M	$367.28M	$614.67M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	2.65%	-1.16%	1.21%	-1.64%
1 Month Performance	-6.91%	-2.96%	-3.18%	-4.25%
1 Year Performance	234.54%	6.33%	4.32%	8.32%

Ampco-Pittsburgh Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AP Ampco-Pittsburgh	0.2835 of 5 stars	$8.33 -2.0%	N/A	+224.8%	$172.50M	$434.17M	N/A	1,432
HY Hyster-Yale	2.7867 of 5 stars	$33.40 +0.5%	$47.50 +42.2%	-11.8%	$595.65M	$3.77B	N/A	7,500	News Coverage
DDD 3D Systems	1.7527 of 5 stars	$3.15 -1.9%	$5.50 +74.6%	+47.5%	$533.33M	$386.90M	N/A	1,418	News Coverage Insider Trade
CMCO Columbus McKinnon	4.6262 of 5 stars	$16.26 -1.2%	$23.00 +41.5%	+0.6%	$474.82M	$1.19B	7.87	7,300
LXFR Luxfer	2.4252 of 5 stars	$17.21 -0.3%	N/A	+16.6%	$461.86M	$384.60M	16.92	1,350	News Coverage Short Interest Increase

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:AP) was last updated on 9/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Ampco-Pittsburgh (AP) Competitors

AP vs. HY, DDD, CMCO, LXFR, and MEC

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Hyster-Yale?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to 3D Systems?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Luxfer?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Mayville Engineering?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AP vs. The Competition

Ampco-Pittsburgh Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Ampco-Pittsburgh (AP) Competitors

AP vs. HY, DDD, CMCO, LXFR, and MEC

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Hyster-Yale?

Which has better earnings & valuation, AP or HY?

Does the media prefer AP or HY?

Do analysts rate AP or HY?

Is AP or HY more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, AP or HY?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of AP or HY?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to 3D Systems?

Do analysts prefer AP or DDD?

Is AP or DDD more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, AP or DDD?

Which has more volatility & risk, AP or DDD?

Does the media favor AP or DDD?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of AP or DDD?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Which has better earnings and valuation, CMCO or AP?

Do analysts prefer CMCO or AP?

Does the media favor CMCO or AP?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of CMCO or AP?

Which has more risk & volatility, CMCO or AP?

Is CMCO or AP more profitable?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Luxfer?

Which has better valuation & earnings, AP or LXFR?

Is AP or LXFR more profitable?

Do analysts prefer AP or LXFR?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in AP or LXFR?

Does the media prefer AP or LXFR?

Which has more risk and volatility, AP or LXFR?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Mayville Engineering?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in AP or MEC?

Do analysts recommend AP or MEC?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, AP or MEC?

Is AP or MEC more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, AP or MEC?

Does the media refer more to AP or MEC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AP vs. The Competition

Ampco-Pittsburgh Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools