Do analysts rate AP or HY?

Hyster-Yale has a consensus price target of $45.00, indicating a potential upside of 29.95%. Given Hyster-Yale's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hyster-Yale is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Hyster-Yale 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media prefer AP or HY?

In the previous week, Ampco-Pittsburgh and Ampco-Pittsburgh both had 2 articles in the media. Hyster-Yale's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's score of 0.58 indicating that Hyster-Yale is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ampco-Pittsburgh 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hyster-Yale 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate AP or CMCO?

Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $23.50, indicating a potential upside of 82.45%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Columbus McKinnon 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.40

Does the media refer more to AP or CMCO?

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 13 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 2 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of -0.12 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ampco-Pittsburgh 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Columbus McKinnon 0 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate AP or ERII?

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 87.27%. Given Energy Recovery's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Energy Recovery is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Energy Recovery 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Do analysts recommend FSTR or AP?

L.B. Foster currently has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 22.91%. Given L.B. Foster's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe L.B. Foster is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score L.B. Foster 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75 Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has better valuation & earnings, FSTR or AP?

L.B. Foster has higher revenue and earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio L.B. Foster $540.01M 0.80 $7.55M $1.03 40.30 Ampco-Pittsburgh $434.17M 0.46 -$66.07M -$3.36 N/A

Does the media favor FSTR or AP?

In the previous week, L.B. Foster had 1 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for L.B. Foster and 2 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. L.B. Foster's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's score of 0.58 indicating that L.B. Foster is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment L.B. Foster 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ampco-Pittsburgh 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer AP or OFLX?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Omega Flex 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Does the media favor AP or OFLX?

In the previous week, Ampco-Pittsburgh had 1 more articles in the media than Omega Flex. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh and 1 mentions for Omega Flex. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's score of 0.58 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ampco-Pittsburgh 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Omega Flex 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Ampco-Pittsburgh (AP) Competitors

$9.76 -1.28 (-11.61%)

Closing price 06/5/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$9.46 -0.29 (-3.00%)

As of 06/5/2026 06:58 PM Eastern

Compare

AP vs. HY, CMCO, ERII, FSTR, and OFLX

Should you buy Ampco-Pittsburgh stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Ampco-Pittsburgh with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Ampco-Pittsburgh include Hyster-Yale (HY), Columbus McKinnon (CMCO), Energy Recovery (ERII), L.B. Foster (FSTR), and Omega Flex (OFLX). These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery" industry.

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Hyster-Yale?

Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) and Hyster-Yale (NYSE:HY) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

Hyster-Yale has a net margin of -2.71% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -15.53%. Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity of -7.56% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-15.53%	-7.56%	-0.91%
Hyster-Yale	-2.71%	-13.96%	-3.44%

Hyster-Yale has a consensus price target of $45.00, indicating a potential upside of 29.95%. Given Hyster-Yale's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hyster-Yale is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Hyster-Yale	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.5% of Hyster-Yale shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 37.8% of Hyster-Yale shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hyster-Yale has higher revenue and earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Hyster-Yale is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ampco-Pittsburgh, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.46	-$66.07M	-$3.36	N/A
Hyster-Yale	$3.77B	0.16	-$60.10M	-$5.59	N/A

In the previous week, Ampco-Pittsburgh and Ampco-Pittsburgh both had 2 articles in the media. Hyster-Yale's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's score of 0.58 indicating that Hyster-Yale is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ampco-Pittsburgh	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hyster-Yale	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hyster-Yale has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Hyster-Yale beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. Ampco-Pittsburgh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.46	-$66.07M	-$3.36	N/A
Columbus McKinnon	$1.19B	0.31	-$229.54M	-$5.48	N/A

49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a net margin of -15.53% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.23%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 6.59% beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-15.53%	-7.56%	-0.91%
Columbus McKinnon	-19.23%	6.59%	3.41%

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 13 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 2 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of -0.12 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ampco-Pittsburgh	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Columbus McKinnon	0 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $23.50, indicating a potential upside of 82.45%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Summary

Columbus McKinnon beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Energy Recovery?

Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) and Energy Recovery (NASDAQ:ERII) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Ampco-Pittsburgh had 2 more articles in the media than Energy Recovery. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh and 0 mentions for Energy Recovery. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Energy Recovery's score of 0.00 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Ampco-Pittsburgh	Positive
Energy Recovery	Neutral

Energy Recovery has a net margin of 15.07% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -15.53%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 10.89% beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-15.53%	-7.56%	-0.91%
Energy Recovery	15.07%	10.89%	9.55%

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 87.27%. Given Energy Recovery's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Energy Recovery is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Energy Recovery	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.6% of Energy Recovery shares are held by institutional investors. 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Energy Recovery shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Recovery has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Energy Recovery has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Recovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.46	-$66.07M	-$3.36	N/A
Energy Recovery	$134.99M	3.06	$22.96M	$0.38	21.08

Summary

Energy Recovery beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to L.B. Foster?

L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) and Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) are both small-cap industrial machinery companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, L.B. Foster had 1 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for L.B. Foster and 2 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. L.B. Foster's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's score of 0.58 indicating that L.B. Foster is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
L.B. Foster	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ampco-Pittsburgh	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

L.B. Foster currently has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 22.91%. Given L.B. Foster's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe L.B. Foster is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
L.B. Foster	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

L.B. Foster has higher revenue and earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
L.B. Foster	$540.01M	0.80	$7.55M	$1.03	40.30
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.46	-$66.07M	-$3.36	N/A

80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by institutional investors. 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 1.98% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -15.53%. L.B. Foster's return on equity of 6.36% beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
L.B. Foster	1.98%	6.36%	3.31%
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-15.53%	-7.56%	-0.91%

L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

L.B. Foster beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Omega Flex?

Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) and Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.1% of Omega Flex shares are held by institutional investors. 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 65.2% of Omega Flex shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Omega Flex has a net margin of 13.60% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -15.53%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-15.53%	-7.56%	-0.91%
Omega Flex	13.60%	15.94%	12.92%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Omega Flex	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Omega Flex has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Omega Flex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.46	-$66.07M	-$3.36	N/A
Omega Flex	$98.30M	3.09	$14.83M	$1.33	22.67

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Omega Flex has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ampco-Pittsburgh had 1 more articles in the media than Omega Flex. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh and 1 mentions for Omega Flex. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's score of 0.58 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ampco-Pittsburgh	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Omega Flex	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Omega Flex beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ampco-Pittsburgh News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Ampco-Pittsburgh	METAL PROC&FABR Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$198.39M	$2.96B	$9.39B	$23.06B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.21%	3.54%	4.10%
P/E Ratio	-2.90	17.86	24.71	27.60
Price / Sales	0.46	13.57	5,041.06	22.11
Price / Cash	10.40	30.87	27.37	18.46
Price / Book	4.13	3.08	4.79	4.62
Net Income	-$66.07M	$91.02M	$793.53M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-13.21%	-1.52%	1.67%	-1.66%
1 Month Performance	-15.68%	0.75%	3.09%	-1.07%
1 Year Performance	166.25%	58.05%	29.84%	21.20%

Ampco-Pittsburgh Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AP Ampco-Pittsburgh	1.205 of 5 stars	$9.76 -11.6%	N/A	+166.2%	$198.39M	$434.17M	N/A	1,432
HY Hyster-Yale	3.6584 of 5 stars	$35.16 +3.8%	$45.00 +28.0%	-15.9%	$630.07M	$3.77B	N/A	7,500	Analyst Upgrade
CMCO Columbus McKinnon	4.1523 of 5 stars	$15.82 +5.9%	$23.50 +48.5%	-16.1%	$454.65M	$1.00B	75.33	3,478	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast
ERII Energy Recovery	3.2079 of 5 stars	$8.77 -0.9%	$15.00 +71.0%	-36.6%	$452.05M	$136.63M	23.08	250
FSTR L.B. Foster	2.7167 of 5 stars	$39.32 +3.2%	$32.00 -18.6%	+114.9%	$411.29M	$540.01M	38.18	1,191	News Coverage Analyst Upgrade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:AP) was last updated on 6/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Ampco-Pittsburgh (AP) Competitors

AP vs. HY, CMCO, ERII, FSTR, and OFLX

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Hyster-Yale?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Energy Recovery?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to L.B. Foster?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Omega Flex?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AP vs. The Competition

Ampco-Pittsburgh Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Ampco-Pittsburgh (AP) Competitors

AP vs. HY, CMCO, ERII, FSTR, and OFLX

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Hyster-Yale?

Is AP or HY more profitable?

Do analysts rate AP or HY?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in AP or HY?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, AP or HY?

Does the media prefer AP or HY?

Which has more risk & volatility, AP or HY?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Which has better valuation & earnings, AP or CMCO?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in AP or CMCO?

Is AP or CMCO more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, AP or CMCO?

Does the media refer more to AP or CMCO?

Do analysts rate AP or CMCO?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Energy Recovery?

Does the media prefer AP or ERII?

Is AP or ERII more profitable?

Do analysts rate AP or ERII?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of AP or ERII?

Which has more risk and volatility, AP or ERII?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, AP or ERII?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to L.B. Foster?

Does the media favor FSTR or AP?

Do analysts recommend FSTR or AP?

Which has better valuation & earnings, FSTR or AP?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in FSTR or AP?

Is FSTR or AP more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, FSTR or AP?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Omega Flex?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of AP or OFLX?

Is AP or OFLX more profitable?

Do analysts prefer AP or OFLX?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, AP or OFLX?

Which has more volatility & risk, AP or OFLX?

Does the media favor AP or OFLX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AP vs. The Competition

Ampco-Pittsburgh Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools