Do analysts recommend AP or HY?

Hyster-Yale has a consensus price target of $45.00, indicating a potential upside of 41.26%. Given Hyster-Yale's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hyster-Yale is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Hyster-Yale 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media refer more to AP or HY?

In the previous week, Ampco-Pittsburgh and Ampco-Pittsburgh both had 1 articles in the media. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Hyster-Yale's score of 0.00 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Hyster-Yale 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend AP or ERII?

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 75.54%. Given Energy Recovery's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Energy Recovery is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Energy Recovery 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media prefer AP or ERII?

In the previous week, Energy Recovery had 1 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Energy Recovery and 1 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Energy Recovery's score of 0.00 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Energy Recovery 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer AP or FSTR?

L.B. Foster has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 23.44%. Given L.B. Foster's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe L.B. Foster is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 L.B. Foster 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, AP or FSTR?

L.B. Foster has higher revenue and earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ampco-Pittsburgh $434.17M 0.36 -$66.07M -$3.36 N/A L.B. Foster $540.01M 0.81 $7.55M $1.03 40.58

Does the media refer more to AP or FSTR?

In the previous week, L.B. Foster had 1 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for L.B. Foster and 1 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat L.B. Foster's score of 0.71 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive L.B. Foster 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer AP or CMCO?

Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $22.00, indicating a potential upside of 52.00%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Columbus McKinnon 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.40

Does the media prefer AP or CMCO?

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 3 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 1 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.94 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Columbus McKinnon 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate OFLX or AP?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Omega Flex 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Does the media favor OFLX or AP?

In the previous week, Omega Flex had 1 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Omega Flex and 1 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Omega Flex's score of 0.71 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Omega Flex 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Ampco-Pittsburgh (AP) Competitors

$7.64 -0.02 (-0.21%)

As of 03:51 PM Eastern

Compare

AP vs. HY, ERII, FSTR, CMCO, and OFLX

Should you buy Ampco-Pittsburgh stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Ampco-Pittsburgh with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Ampco-Pittsburgh include Hyster-Yale (HY), Energy Recovery (ERII), L.B. Foster (FSTR), Columbus McKinnon (CMCO), and Omega Flex (OFLX). These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery" industry.

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Hyster-Yale?

Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) and Hyster-Yale (NYSE:HY) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.5% of Hyster-Yale shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.8% of Hyster-Yale shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hyster-Yale has a net margin of -2.71% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -15.53%. Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity of -7.56% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-15.53%	-7.56%	-0.91%
Hyster-Yale	-2.71%	-13.96%	-3.44%

Hyster-Yale has a consensus price target of $45.00, indicating a potential upside of 41.26%. Given Hyster-Yale's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hyster-Yale is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Hyster-Yale	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hyster-Yale has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

Hyster-Yale has higher revenue and earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Hyster-Yale is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ampco-Pittsburgh, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.36	-$66.07M	-$3.36	N/A
Hyster-Yale	$3.77B	0.15	-$60.10M	-$5.59	N/A

In the previous week, Ampco-Pittsburgh and Ampco-Pittsburgh both had 1 articles in the media. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Hyster-Yale's score of 0.00 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Hyster-Yale	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Hyster-Yale beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Energy Recovery?

Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) and Energy Recovery (NASDAQ:ERII) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

Energy Recovery has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Recovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.36	-$66.07M	-$3.36	N/A
Energy Recovery	$134.99M	3.26	$22.96M	$0.38	22.49

Energy Recovery has a net margin of 15.07% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -15.53%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 10.89% beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-15.53%	-7.56%	-0.91%
Energy Recovery	15.07%	10.89%	9.55%

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Recovery has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 75.54%. Given Energy Recovery's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Energy Recovery is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Energy Recovery	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Energy Recovery had 1 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Energy Recovery and 1 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Energy Recovery's score of 0.00 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Energy Recovery	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.6% of Energy Recovery shares are held by institutional investors. 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Energy Recovery shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Energy Recovery beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to L.B. Foster?

Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) and L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) are both small-cap industrial machinery companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, L.B. Foster had 1 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for L.B. Foster and 1 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat L.B. Foster's score of 0.71 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
L.B. Foster	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

L.B. Foster has higher revenue and earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.36	-$66.07M	-$3.36	N/A
L.B. Foster	$540.01M	0.81	$7.55M	$1.03	40.58

49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

L.B. Foster has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 23.44%. Given L.B. Foster's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe L.B. Foster is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
L.B. Foster	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 1.98% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -15.53%. L.B. Foster's return on equity of 6.36% beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-15.53%	-7.56%	-0.91%
L.B. Foster	1.98%	6.36%	3.31%

Summary

L.B. Foster beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ampco-Pittsburgh, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.36	-$66.07M	-$3.36	N/A
Columbus McKinnon	$1.19B	0.35	-$229.54M	-$5.48	N/A

49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a net margin of -15.53% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.23%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 7.09% beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-15.53%	-7.56%	-0.91%
Columbus McKinnon	-19.23%	7.09%	2.39%

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 3 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 1 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.94 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Columbus McKinnon	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $22.00, indicating a potential upside of 52.00%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Summary

Columbus McKinnon beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Omega Flex?

Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) and Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Omega Flex has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Omega Flex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Omega Flex	$98.30M	3.04	$14.83M	$1.33	22.29
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.36	-$66.07M	-$3.36	N/A

36.1% of Omega Flex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by institutional investors. 65.2% of Omega Flex shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Omega Flex has a net margin of 13.60% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -15.53%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Omega Flex	13.60%	15.94%	12.92%
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-15.53%	-7.56%	-0.91%

In the previous week, Omega Flex had 1 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Omega Flex and 1 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Omega Flex's score of 0.71 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Omega Flex	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Omega Flex	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Omega Flex beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ampco-Pittsburgh News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Ampco-Pittsburgh	METAL PROC&FABR Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$156.40M	$2.72B	$9.34B	$23.26B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.16%	3.51%	4.16%
P/E Ratio	-2.29	18.31	26.79	30.74
Price / Sales	0.36	16.47	1,935.32	21.02
Price / Cash	8.17	14.63	27.26	18.80
Price / Book	3.24	3.19	4.39	4.74
Net Income	-$66.07M	$91.72M	$792.80M	$1.06B
7 Day Performance	-1.29%	0.80%	-0.05%	-0.15%
1 Month Performance	-29.22%	-2.42%	0.56%	0.79%
1 Year Performance	135.85%	51.41%	14.31%	16.51%

Ampco-Pittsburgh Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AP Ampco-Pittsburgh	1.2017 of 5 stars	$7.64 -0.2%	N/A	+137.0%	$156.40M	$434.17M	N/A	1,432	Positive News
HY Hyster-Yale	2.3477 of 5 stars	$31.85 -3.6%	$45.00 +41.3%	-19.6%	$570.82M	$3.77B	N/A	7,500
ERII Energy Recovery	3.7057 of 5 stars	$8.80 -2.2%	$15.00 +70.5%	-36.3%	$453.55M	$134.99M	23.16	250
FSTR L.B. Foster	1.6949 of 5 stars	$42.25 -3.1%	$32.00 -24.3%	+84.4%	$441.94M	$540.01M	41.02	1,191
CMCO Columbus McKinnon	4.4412 of 5 stars	$13.28 -5.1%	$22.00 +65.7%	-5.9%	$382.86M	$1.19B	N/A	7,300

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:AP) was last updated on 7/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Ampco-Pittsburgh (AP) Competitors

AP vs. HY, ERII, FSTR, CMCO, and OFLX

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Hyster-Yale?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Energy Recovery?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to L.B. Foster?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Omega Flex?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AP vs. The Competition

Ampco-Pittsburgh Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Ampco-Pittsburgh (AP) Competitors

AP vs. HY, ERII, FSTR, CMCO, and OFLX

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Hyster-Yale?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in AP or HY?

Is AP or HY more profitable?

Do analysts recommend AP or HY?

Which has more volatility & risk, AP or HY?

Which has better valuation and earnings, AP or HY?

Does the media refer more to AP or HY?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Energy Recovery?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, AP or ERII?

Is AP or ERII more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, AP or ERII?

Do analysts recommend AP or ERII?

Does the media prefer AP or ERII?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in AP or ERII?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to L.B. Foster?

Does the media refer more to AP or FSTR?

Which has more volatility and risk, AP or FSTR?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, AP or FSTR?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in AP or FSTR?

Do analysts prefer AP or FSTR?

Is AP or FSTR more profitable?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, AP or CMCO?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in AP or CMCO?

Is AP or CMCO more profitable?

Does the media prefer AP or CMCO?

Which has more risk & volatility, AP or CMCO?

Do analysts prefer AP or CMCO?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Omega Flex?

Which has better earnings & valuation, OFLX or AP?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of OFLX or AP?

Is OFLX or AP more profitable?

Does the media favor OFLX or AP?

Do analysts rate OFLX or AP?

Which has more risk and volatility, OFLX or AP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AP vs. The Competition

Ampco-Pittsburgh Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools