Do analysts prefer AP or SSYS?

Stratasys has a consensus target price of $12.33, indicating a potential upside of 38.42%. Given Stratasys' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Stratasys is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Stratasys 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.83

Does the media favor AP or SSYS?

In the previous week, Ampco-Pittsburgh and Ampco-Pittsburgh both had 3 articles in the media. Stratasys' average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's score of 0.00 indicating that Stratasys is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ampco-Pittsburgh 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Stratasys 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend AP or HY?

Hyster-Yale has a consensus price target of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 28.91%. Given Hyster-Yale's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hyster-Yale is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Hyster-Yale 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25

Does the media favor AP or HY?

In the previous week, Hyster-Yale had 26 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Hyster-Yale and 3 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Hyster-Yale's score of -0.06 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ampco-Pittsburgh 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Hyster-Yale 4 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend AP or CMCO?

Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $23.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.75%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Columbus McKinnon 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.40

Does the media favor AP or CMCO?

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 4 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 3 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's score of 0.00 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ampco-Pittsburgh 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Columbus McKinnon 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Do analysts recommend MEC or AP?

Mayville Engineering presently has a consensus price target of $35.75, suggesting a potential upside of 48.43%. Given Mayville Engineering's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Mayville Engineering is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mayville Engineering 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Does the media prefer MEC or AP?

In the previous week, Mayville Engineering had 16 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Mayville Engineering and 3 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Mayville Engineering's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's score of 0.00 indicating that Mayville Engineering is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mayville Engineering 4 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Ampco-Pittsburgh 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend DDD or AP?

3D Systems currently has a consensus target price of $5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 49.05%. Given 3D Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe 3D Systems is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score 3D Systems 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.40 Ampco-Pittsburgh 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Does the media prefer DDD or AP?

In the previous week, 3D Systems had 17 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for 3D Systems and 3 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. 3D Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's score of 0.00 indicating that 3D Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment 3D Systems 6 Very Positive mention(s) 6 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ampco-Pittsburgh 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Ampco-Pittsburgh (AP) Competitors

$9.48 -0.03 (-0.27%)

As of 09:44 AM Eastern

Compare

AP vs. SSYS, HY, CMCO, MEC, and DDD

Should you buy Ampco-Pittsburgh stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Ampco-Pittsburgh with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Ampco-Pittsburgh include Stratasys (SSYS), Hyster-Yale (HY), Columbus McKinnon (CMCO), Mayville Engineering (MEC), and 3D Systems (DDD). These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Stratasys?

Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) and Stratasys (NASDAQ:SSYS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a net margin of -15.53% compared to Stratasys' net margin of -21.00%. Stratasys' return on equity of -1.73% beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-15.53%	-7.56%	-0.91%
Stratasys	-21.00%	-1.73%	-1.35%

Stratasys has a consensus target price of $12.33, indicating a potential upside of 38.42%. Given Stratasys' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Stratasys is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Stratasys	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

Ampco-Pittsburgh has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Stratasys. Stratasys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ampco-Pittsburgh, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.45	-$66.07M	-$3.36	N/A
Stratasys	$551.10M	1.39	-$104.29M	-$1.35	N/A

In the previous week, Ampco-Pittsburgh and Ampco-Pittsburgh both had 3 articles in the media. Stratasys' average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's score of 0.00 indicating that Stratasys is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ampco-Pittsburgh	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Stratasys	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.8% of Stratasys shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Stratasys shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Stratasys has a beta of 1.94, meaning that its stock price is 94% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Stratasys beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Hyster-Yale?

Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) and Hyster-Yale (NYSE:HY) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Hyster-Yale has higher revenue and earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Hyster-Yale is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ampco-Pittsburgh, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.45	-$66.07M	-$3.36	N/A
Hyster-Yale	$3.77B	0.18	-$60.10M	-$6.56	N/A

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hyster-Yale has a beta of 1.62, indicating that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the broader market.

Hyster-Yale has a consensus price target of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 28.91%. Given Hyster-Yale's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hyster-Yale is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Hyster-Yale	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Hyster-Yale has a net margin of -3.33% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -15.53%. Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity of -7.56% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-15.53%	-7.56%	-0.91%
Hyster-Yale	-3.33%	-21.03%	-4.87%

49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.5% of Hyster-Yale shares are held by institutional investors. 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 37.8% of Hyster-Yale shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Hyster-Yale had 26 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Hyster-Yale and 3 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Ampco-Pittsburgh's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Hyster-Yale's score of -0.06 indicating that Ampco-Pittsburgh is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ampco-Pittsburgh	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Hyster-Yale	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Hyster-Yale beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a net margin of -15.53% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -21.25%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 10.02% beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-15.53%	-7.56%	-0.91%
Columbus McKinnon	-21.25%	10.02%	2.36%

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 4 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 3 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's score of 0.00 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ampco-Pittsburgh	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Columbus McKinnon	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Ampco-Pittsburgh has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. Ampco-Pittsburgh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.45	-$66.07M	-$3.36	N/A
Columbus McKinnon	$1.19B	0.49	-$229.54M	-$7.46	N/A

Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $23.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.75%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Columbus McKinnon beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Mayville Engineering?

Mayville Engineering (NYSE:MEC) and Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Mayville Engineering had 16 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Mayville Engineering and 3 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. Mayville Engineering's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's score of 0.00 indicating that Mayville Engineering is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mayville Engineering	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Ampco-Pittsburgh	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Mayville Engineering has higher revenue and earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. Mayville Engineering is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ampco-Pittsburgh, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mayville Engineering	$546.49M	1.12	-$8.11M	-$0.84	N/A
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.45	-$66.07M	-$3.36	N/A

Mayville Engineering has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

45.4% of Mayville Engineering shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of Mayville Engineering shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Mayville Engineering has a net margin of -2.95% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -15.53%. Mayville Engineering's return on equity of -6.63% beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mayville Engineering	-2.95%	-6.63%	-2.99%
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-15.53%	-7.56%	-0.91%

Mayville Engineering presently has a consensus price target of $35.75, suggesting a potential upside of 48.43%. Given Mayville Engineering's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Mayville Engineering is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mayville Engineering	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

Mayville Engineering beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to 3D Systems?

3D Systems (NYSE:DDD) and Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

3D Systems currently has a consensus target price of $5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 49.05%. Given 3D Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe 3D Systems is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
3D Systems	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Ampco-Pittsburgh	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

3D Systems has a beta of 2.73, meaning that its stock price is 173% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

64.5% of 3D Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of 3D Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

3D Systems has a net margin of -14.15% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -15.53%. Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity of -7.56% beat 3D Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
3D Systems	-14.15%	-19.56%	-8.92%
Ampco-Pittsburgh	-15.53%	-7.56%	-0.91%

In the previous week, 3D Systems had 17 more articles in the media than Ampco-Pittsburgh. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for 3D Systems and 3 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh. 3D Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's score of 0.00 indicating that 3D Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
3D Systems	6 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ampco-Pittsburgh	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

3D Systems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ampco-Pittsburgh. 3D Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ampco-Pittsburgh, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
3D Systems	$386.90M	1.58	$29.88M	-$0.41	N/A
Ampco-Pittsburgh	$434.17M	0.45	-$66.07M	-$3.36	N/A

Summary

3D Systems beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ampco-Pittsburgh News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Ampco-Pittsburgh	Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$193.75M	$11.83B	$10.89B	$24.11B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.15%	97.10%	3.69%
P/E Ratio	-2.84	22.06	28.58	29.19
Price / Sales	0.45	63.00	347.53	13.03
Price / Cash	10.14	23.56	24.70	19.37
Price / Book	4.04	4.50	4.95	4.91
Net Income	-$66.07M	$358.52M	$608.56M	$1.06B
7 Day Performance	13.71%	1.49%	2.46%	1.65%
1 Month Performance	21.80%	1.61%	1.94%	2.63%
1 Year Performance	180.29%	14.06%	15.24%	20.40%

Ampco-Pittsburgh Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AP Ampco-Pittsburgh	0.5586 of 5 stars	$9.48 -0.3%	N/A	+180.3%	$196.00M	$434.17M	N/A	1,432	News Coverage Upcoming Earnings Gap Up
SSYS Stratasys	3.7001 of 5 stars	$8.80 +8.2%	$12.33 +40.2%	-19.4%	$700.59M	$547.75M	N/A	1,757	Positive News Upcoming Earnings
HY Hyster-Yale	2.8961 of 5 stars	$35.06 flat	$45.00 +28.4%	+2.2%	$628.28M	$3.77B	N/A	7,500	Earnings Report Analyst Revision
CMCO Columbus McKinnon	4.6547 of 5 stars	$21.59 +7.3%	$23.00 +6.5%	+45.5%	$580.02M	$1.49B	N/A	7,300	Ex-Dividend Gap Up
MEC Mayville Engineering	3.1096 of 5 stars	$27.79 +4.7%	$33.25 +19.6%	+75.2%	$569.42M	$546.49M	N/A	2,400	Earnings Report Insider Trade High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:AP) was last updated on 8/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Ampco-Pittsburgh (AP) Competitors

AP vs. SSYS, HY, CMCO, MEC, and DDD

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Stratasys?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Hyster-Yale?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Mayville Engineering?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to 3D Systems?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AP vs. The Competition

Ampco-Pittsburgh Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Ampco-Pittsburgh (AP) Competitors

AP vs. SSYS, HY, CMCO, MEC, and DDD

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Stratasys?

Is AP or SSYS more profitable?

Do analysts prefer AP or SSYS?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, AP or SSYS?

Does the media favor AP or SSYS?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in AP or SSYS?

Which has more risk & volatility, AP or SSYS?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Hyster-Yale?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, AP or HY?

Which has more risk and volatility, AP or HY?

Do analysts recommend AP or HY?

Is AP or HY more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of AP or HY?

Does the media favor AP or HY?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Is AP or CMCO more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, AP or CMCO?

Does the media favor AP or CMCO?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, AP or CMCO?

Do analysts recommend AP or CMCO?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of AP or CMCO?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to Mayville Engineering?

Does the media prefer MEC or AP?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MEC or AP?

Which has more volatility & risk, MEC or AP?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of MEC or AP?

Is MEC or AP more profitable?

Do analysts recommend MEC or AP?

Summary

How does Ampco-Pittsburgh compare to 3D Systems?

Do analysts recommend DDD or AP?

Which has more risk and volatility, DDD or AP?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of DDD or AP?

Is DDD or AP more profitable?

Does the media prefer DDD or AP?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, DDD or AP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AP vs. The Competition

Ampco-Pittsburgh Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools