Does the media favor CMCO or TKR?

In the previous week, Timken had 9 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Timken and 4 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Timken's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.86 indicating that Timken is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Columbus McKinnon 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Timken 10 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate GRC or CMCO?

Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $23.00, indicating a potential upside of 28.46%. Given Columbus McKinnon's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Gorman-Rupp. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gorman-Rupp 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Columbus McKinnon 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 2 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.80

Does the media prefer GRC or CMCO?

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 2 more articles in the media than Gorman-Rupp. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 2 mentions for Gorman-Rupp. Gorman-Rupp's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.86 indicating that Gorman-Rupp is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gorman-Rupp 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Columbus McKinnon 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer CMCO or PRLB?

In the previous week, Proto Labs had 1 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Proto Labs and 4 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Proto Labs' average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.86 indicating that Proto Labs is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Columbus McKinnon 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Proto Labs 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is ATS or CMCO more profitable?

ATS has a net margin of 1.60% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -21.25%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 10.02% beat ATS's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ATS 1.60% 8.96% 3.63% Columbus McKinnon -21.25% 10.02% 2.36%

Does the media favor ATS or CMCO?

In the previous week, ATS had 3 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for ATS and 4 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat ATS's score of 0.71 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ATS 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Columbus McKinnon 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Columbus McKinnon (CMCO) Competitors

$17.90 -1.18 (-6.16%)

As of 02:14 PM Eastern

Compare

CMCO vs. TKR, GRC, PRLB, ATS, and EPAC

Should you buy Columbus McKinnon stock or one of its competitors? Columbus McKinnon's main competitors and comparable companies include Timken (TKR), Gorman-Rupp (GRC), Proto Labs (PRLB), ATS (ATS), and Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Timken?

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and Timken (NYSE:TKR) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

Timken has a net margin of 5.43% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -21.25%. Timken's return on equity of 12.63% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Columbus McKinnon	-21.25%	10.02%	2.36%
Timken	5.43%	12.63%	6.21%

96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Timken shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Timken shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Columbus McKinnon presently has a consensus target price of $23.00, indicating a potential upside of 28.46%. Timken has a consensus target price of $150.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.94%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Timken.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Timken	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Timken pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Columbus McKinnon pays out -3.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Timken pays out 39.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Timken has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Columbus McKinnon is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Timken had 9 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Timken and 4 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Timken's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.86 indicating that Timken is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Columbus McKinnon	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Timken	10 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Timken has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Timken, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Columbus McKinnon	$1.19B	0.43	-$229.54M	-$7.46	N/A
Timken	$4.76B	1.88	$288.40M	$3.69	35.06

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Timken has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Timken beats Columbus McKinnon on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Gorman-Rupp?

Gorman-Rupp (NYSE:GRC) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

Gorman-Rupp has a net margin of 8.88% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -21.25%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 15.55% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gorman-Rupp	8.88%	15.55%	7.59%
Columbus McKinnon	-21.25%	10.02%	2.36%

Gorman-Rupp has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gorman-Rupp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gorman-Rupp	$682.39M	3.03	$53.02M	$2.37	32.99
Columbus McKinnon	$1.19B	0.43	-$229.54M	-$7.46	N/A

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 2 more articles in the media than Gorman-Rupp. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 2 mentions for Gorman-Rupp. Gorman-Rupp's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.86 indicating that Gorman-Rupp is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gorman-Rupp	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Columbus McKinnon	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $23.00, indicating a potential upside of 28.46%. Given Columbus McKinnon's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Gorman-Rupp.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gorman-Rupp	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Gorman-Rupp pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Gorman-Rupp pays out 32.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out -3.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gorman-Rupp has raised its dividend for 52 consecutive years. Columbus McKinnon is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

59.3% of Gorman-Rupp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.6% of Gorman-Rupp shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Gorman-Rupp beats Columbus McKinnon on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Proto Labs?

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and Proto Labs (NYSE:PRLB) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Proto Labs has a net margin of 5.44% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -21.25%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 10.02% beat Proto Labs' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Columbus McKinnon	-21.25%	10.02%	2.36%
Proto Labs	5.44%	4.80%	4.22%

In the previous week, Proto Labs had 1 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Proto Labs and 4 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Proto Labs' average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.86 indicating that Proto Labs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Columbus McKinnon	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Proto Labs	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Proto Labs has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Proto Labs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Columbus McKinnon	$1.19B	0.43	-$229.54M	-$7.46	N/A
Proto Labs	$533.13M	3.82	$21.24M	$1.25	68.18

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Proto Labs has a beta of 1.4, meaning that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Proto Labs shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Proto Labs shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Columbus McKinnon presently has a consensus price target of $23.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.46%. Proto Labs has a consensus price target of $89.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.43%. Given Columbus McKinnon's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Proto Labs.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Proto Labs	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.25

Summary

Proto Labs beats Columbus McKinnon on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to ATS?

ATS (NYSE:ATS) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

In the previous week, ATS had 3 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for ATS and 4 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat ATS's score of 0.71 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ATS	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Columbus McKinnon	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

75.8% of ATS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ATS has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ATS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ATS	$2.93B	0.65	$51.85M	$0.34	57.15
Columbus McKinnon	$1.19B	0.43	-$229.54M	-$7.46	N/A

ATS has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

ATS currently has a consensus target price of $42.50, suggesting a potential upside of 118.72%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $23.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.46%. Given ATS's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe ATS is more favorable than Columbus McKinnon.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ATS	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.14
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

ATS has a net margin of 1.60% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -21.25%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 10.02% beat ATS's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ATS	1.60%	8.96%	3.63%
Columbus McKinnon	-21.25%	10.02%	2.36%

Summary

ATS beats Columbus McKinnon on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Enerpac Tool Group (NYSE:EPAC) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Enerpac Tool Group presently has a consensus price target of $50.00, suggesting a potential upside of 36.84%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $23.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.46%. Given Enerpac Tool Group's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Enerpac Tool Group is more favorable than Columbus McKinnon.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enerpac Tool Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Enerpac Tool Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enerpac Tool Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enerpac Tool Group	$634.08M	2.95	$92.75M	$1.77	20.64
Columbus McKinnon	$1.19B	0.43	-$229.54M	-$7.46	N/A

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 4 more articles in the media than Enerpac Tool Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 0 mentions for Enerpac Tool Group. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Enerpac Tool Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Enerpac Tool Group	Neutral
Columbus McKinnon	Positive

Enerpac Tool Group has a net margin of 14.72% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -21.25%. Enerpac Tool Group's return on equity of 23.21% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enerpac Tool Group	14.72%	23.21%	12.10%
Columbus McKinnon	-21.25%	10.02%	2.36%

Enerpac Tool Group has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

97.7% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Enerpac Tool Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Enerpac Tool Group pays out 2.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out -3.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Columbus McKinnon is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Enerpac Tool Group and Columbus McKinnon tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Columbus McKinnon News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMCO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CMCO vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Columbus McKinnon	Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$516.31M	$11.52B	$10.79B	$12.85B
Dividend Yield	1.45%	2.18%	97.21%	10.63%
P/E Ratio	-2.40	21.00	27.00	24.98
Price / Sales	0.43	65.65	314.15	73.88
Price / Cash	3.92	23.81	24.92	38.47
Price / Book	0.78	4.44	4.94	6.45
Net Income	-$229.54M	$355.95M	$609.63M	$347.47M
7 Day Performance	-8.42%	-0.29%	-0.12%	0.30%
1 Month Performance	24.68%	1.42%	3.06%	1.65%
1 Year Performance	23.05%	12.59%	13.34%	19.25%

Columbus McKinnon Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CMCO Columbus McKinnon	4.8505 of 5 stars	$17.90 -6.2%	$23.00 +28.5%	+33.4%	$516.31M	$1.19B	N/A	7,300	Positive News
TKR Timken	4.9239 of 5 stars	$128.09 +1.2%	$150.00 +17.1%	+76.3%	$8.85B	$4.58B	34.62	19,000	Positive News
GRC Gorman-Rupp	3.422 of 5 stars	$83.42 +2.0%	N/A	+94.9%	$2.18B	$682.39M	34.91	1,415	Positive News
PRLB Proto Labs	3.2451 of 5 stars	$90.67 +1.1%	$89.00 -1.8%	+88.5%	$2.16B	$533.13M	72.21	2,280	Positive News
ATS ATS	3.3229 of 5 stars	$20.22 +2.5%	$42.50 +110.2%	-29.1%	$1.94B	$2.15B	58.28	7,000	News Coverage High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CMCO) was last updated on 8/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Columbus McKinnon (CMCO) Competitors

CMCO vs. TKR, GRC, PRLB, ATS, and EPAC

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Timken?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Gorman-Rupp?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Proto Labs?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to ATS?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CMCO vs. The Competition

Columbus McKinnon Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Columbus McKinnon (CMCO) Competitors

CMCO vs. TKR, GRC, PRLB, ATS, and EPAC

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Timken?

Is CMCO or TKR more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of CMCO or TKR?

Do analysts rate CMCO or TKR?

Is CMCO or TKR a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor CMCO or TKR?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CMCO or TKR?

Which has more volatility & risk, CMCO or TKR?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Gorman-Rupp?

Which has more risk and volatility, GRC or CMCO?

Is GRC or CMCO more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, GRC or CMCO?

Does the media prefer GRC or CMCO?

Do analysts rate GRC or CMCO?

Is GRC or CMCO a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in GRC or CMCO?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Proto Labs?

Is CMCO or PRLB more profitable?

Does the media prefer CMCO or PRLB?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, CMCO or PRLB?

Which has more risk and volatility, CMCO or PRLB?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CMCO or PRLB?

Do analysts recommend CMCO or PRLB?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to ATS?

Does the media favor ATS or CMCO?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of ATS or CMCO?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, ATS or CMCO?

Which has more volatility and risk, ATS or CMCO?

Do analysts prefer ATS or CMCO?

Is ATS or CMCO more profitable?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Do analysts recommend EPAC or CMCO?

Which has better valuation & earnings, EPAC or CMCO?

Does the media favor EPAC or CMCO?

Is EPAC or CMCO more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, EPAC or CMCO?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in EPAC or CMCO?

Is EPAC or CMCO a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CMCO vs. The Competition

Columbus McKinnon Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools