Free Trial

Columbus McKinnon (CMCO) Competitors

Columbus McKinnon logo
$16.02 -0.10 (-0.59%)
As of 02:14 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CMCO vs. TKR, PRLB, TRS, TNC, and GHM

Should you buy Columbus McKinnon stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Columbus McKinnon with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Columbus McKinnon include Timken (TKR), Proto Labs (PRLB), TriMas (TRS), Tennant (TNC), and Graham (GHM). These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery" industry.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Timken?

Timken (NYSE:TKR) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both industrial machinery companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

89.1% of Timken shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.1% of Timken shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Timken pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Timken pays out 32.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out 133.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Timken has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Timken had 19 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Timken and 4 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Timken's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.58 indicating that Timken is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Timken
8 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Columbus McKinnon
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Timken presently has a consensus target price of $139.13, suggesting a potential upside of 8.88%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 46.74%. Given Columbus McKinnon's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Timken.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Timken
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Timken has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

Timken has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Timken is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Timken$4.58B1.94$288.40M$4.4029.04
Columbus McKinnon$1.00B0.46-$5.14M$0.2176.26

Timken has a net margin of 6.60% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of 0.60%. Timken's return on equity of 11.84% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Timken6.60% 11.84% 5.79%
Columbus McKinnon 0.60%7.41%3.82%

Summary

Timken beats Columbus McKinnon on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Proto Labs?

Proto Labs (NYSE:PRLB) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Proto Labs currently has a consensus target price of $53.33, suggesting a potential downside of 29.85%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 46.74%. Given Columbus McKinnon's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Proto Labs.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Proto Labs
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 3 more articles in the media than Proto Labs. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 1 mentions for Proto Labs. Proto Labs' average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.58 indicating that Proto Labs is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Proto Labs
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Columbus McKinnon
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

84.5% of Proto Labs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Proto Labs shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Proto Labs has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. Proto Labs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Proto Labs$533.13M3.39$21.24M$1.0671.73
Columbus McKinnon$1.00B0.46-$5.14M$0.2176.26

Proto Labs has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

Proto Labs has a net margin of 4.71% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of 0.60%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 7.41% beat Proto Labs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Proto Labs4.71% 4.15% 3.66%
Columbus McKinnon 0.60%7.41%3.82%

Summary

Columbus McKinnon beats Proto Labs on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to TriMas?

TriMas (NASDAQ:TRS) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

TriMas pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. TriMas pays out 0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out 133.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

TriMas has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. TriMas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TriMas$1.04B1.42$120.14M$24.071.71
Columbus McKinnon$1.00B0.46-$5.14M$0.2176.26

In the previous week, TriMas had 5 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for TriMas and 4 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. TriMas' average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.58 indicating that TriMas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
TriMas Positive
Columbus McKinnon Positive

TriMas has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

TriMas presently has a consensus target price of $41.50, suggesting a potential upside of 0.83%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 46.74%. Given Columbus McKinnon's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than TriMas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TriMas
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

99.4% of TriMas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. 17.5% of TriMas shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TriMas has a net margin of 93.79% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of 0.60%. TriMas' return on equity of 8.38% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TriMas93.79% 8.38% 4.53%
Columbus McKinnon 0.60%7.41%3.82%

Summary

TriMas beats Columbus McKinnon on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Tennant?

Tennant (NYSE:TNC) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

93.3% of Tennant shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. 3.5% of Tennant shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tennant has a net margin of 2.55% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of 0.60%. Tennant's return on equity of 14.87% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tennant2.55% 14.87% 7.17%
Columbus McKinnon 0.60%7.41%3.82%

Tennant has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

Tennant pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Tennant pays out 74.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out 133.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Tennant has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years.

Tennant currently has a consensus price target of $91.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.51%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 46.74%. Given Columbus McKinnon's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Tennant.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tennant
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Tennant has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Tennant is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tennant$1.20B1.23$43.80M$1.6652.45
Columbus McKinnon$1.00B0.46-$5.14M$0.2176.26

In the previous week, Tennant had 1 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Tennant and 4 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Tennant's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.58 indicating that Tennant is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tennant
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Columbus McKinnon
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Tennant beats Columbus McKinnon on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Graham?

Graham (NYSE:GHM) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Graham has a net margin of 6.28% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of 0.60%. Graham's return on equity of 13.26% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Graham6.28% 13.26% 6.07%
Columbus McKinnon 0.60%7.41%3.82%

Graham presently has a consensus price target of $81.67, suggesting a potential downside of 17.19%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 46.74%. Given Columbus McKinnon's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Graham.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Graham
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Graham has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Graham had 5 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Graham and 4 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Graham's score of -0.07 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Graham
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Columbus McKinnon
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

69.5% of Graham shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.0% of Graham shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Graham has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. Graham is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Graham$209.90M5.48$12.23M$1.3573.05
Columbus McKinnon$1.00B0.46-$5.14M$0.2176.26

Summary

Graham beats Columbus McKinnon on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Columbus McKinnon News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMCO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMCO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMCO vs. The Competition

MetricColumbus McKinnonMACH IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$460.54M$15.00B$9.55B$12.58B
Dividend Yield1.77%1.00%3.53%5.26%
P/E Ratio76.3163.1925.8426.31
Price / Sales0.465.295,130.15114.16
Price / Cash10.2327.9628.2356.90
Price / Book0.525.995.227.34
Net Income-$5.14M$295.37M$795.50M$336.95M
7 Day Performance7.20%1.89%1.84%3.65%
1 Month Performance8.43%0.30%4.45%7.39%
1 Year Performance4.88%11.82%32.71%37.74%

Columbus McKinnon Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon
3.3327 of 5 stars
$16.02
-0.6%
$23.50
+46.7%
+2.7%$460.54M$1.00B76.313,478
TKR
Timken
4.9265 of 5 stars
$120.08
+0.1%
$136.63
+13.8%
+82.1%$8.34B$4.58B27.2919,000
PRLB
Proto Labs
2.2715 of 5 stars
$71.36
0.0%
$53.33
-25.3%
+98.2%$1.70B$533.13M67.322,280
TRS
TriMas
3.6655 of 5 stars
$40.12
flat
$41.50
+3.4%
+56.2%$1.44B$1.04B1.673,700
TNC
Tennant
4.0385 of 5 stars
$83.83
0.0%
$91.00
+8.6%
+19.6%$1.43B$1.20B50.504,484

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CMCO) was last updated on 5/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners