Does the media favor TKR or CMCO?

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 10 more articles in the media than Timken. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 1 mentions for Timken. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Timken's score of 0.10 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Timken 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Columbus McKinnon 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Is ATS or CMCO more profitable?

ATS has a net margin of 1.60% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -21.25%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 10.02% beat ATS's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ATS 1.60% 8.96% 3.63% Columbus McKinnon -21.25% 10.02% 2.36%

Does the media prefer ATS or CMCO?

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 9 more articles in the media than ATS. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 2 mentions for ATS. ATS's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.48 indicating that ATS is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ATS 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Columbus McKinnon 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer CMCO or AIN?

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 9 more articles in the media than Albany International. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 2 mentions for Albany International. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Albany International's score of 0.00 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Columbus McKinnon 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Albany International 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Columbus McKinnon (CMCO) Competitors

$16.40 -0.43 (-2.55%)

As of 03:39 PM Eastern

Compare

CMCO vs. TKR, ATS, EPAC, AIN, and CMPO

Should you buy Columbus McKinnon stock or one of its competitors? Columbus McKinnon's main competitors and comparable companies include Timken (TKR), ATS (ATS), Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC), Albany International (AIN), and CompoSecure (CMPO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Timken?

Timken (NYSE:TKR) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Timken currently has a consensus target price of $145.50, indicating a potential upside of 24.40%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $23.00, indicating a potential upside of 40.30%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Timken.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Timken	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Timken has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

89.1% of Timken shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of Timken shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Timken pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Timken pays out 39.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out -3.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Timken has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Columbus McKinnon is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 10 more articles in the media than Timken. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 1 mentions for Timken. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Timken's score of 0.10 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Timken	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Columbus McKinnon	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Timken has a net margin of 5.43% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -21.25%. Timken's return on equity of 12.63% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Timken	5.43%	12.63%	6.21%
Columbus McKinnon	-21.25%	10.02%	2.36%

Timken has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Timken, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Timken	$4.58B	1.77	$288.40M	$3.69	31.70
Columbus McKinnon	$1.49B	0.32	-$229.54M	-$7.46	N/A

Summary

Timken beats Columbus McKinnon on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to ATS?

ATS (NYSE:ATS) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and profitability.

ATS has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ATS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ATS	$2.15B	0.86	$51.85M	$0.34	55.25
Columbus McKinnon	$1.49B	0.32	-$229.54M	-$7.46	N/A

ATS has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

ATS currently has a consensus target price of $42.50, suggesting a potential upside of 126.24%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $23.00, suggesting a potential upside of 40.30%. Given ATS's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe ATS is more favorable than Columbus McKinnon.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ATS	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.14
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 9 more articles in the media than ATS. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 2 mentions for ATS. ATS's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.48 indicating that ATS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ATS	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Columbus McKinnon	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

75.8% of ATS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ATS has a net margin of 1.60% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -21.25%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 10.02% beat ATS's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ATS	1.60%	8.96%	3.63%
Columbus McKinnon	-21.25%	10.02%	2.36%

Summary

ATS beats Columbus McKinnon on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Enerpac Tool Group (NYSE:EPAC) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

Enerpac Tool Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Enerpac Tool Group pays out 2.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out -3.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Columbus McKinnon is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

97.7% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 11 more articles in the media than Enerpac Tool Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 0 mentions for Enerpac Tool Group. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Enerpac Tool Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Enerpac Tool Group	Neutral
Columbus McKinnon	Neutral

Enerpac Tool Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enerpac Tool Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enerpac Tool Group	$616.90M	2.94	$92.75M	$1.77	20.03
Columbus McKinnon	$1.49B	0.32	-$229.54M	-$7.46	N/A

Enerpac Tool Group presently has a consensus target price of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 41.00%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $23.00, indicating a potential upside of 40.30%. Given Enerpac Tool Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Enerpac Tool Group is more favorable than Columbus McKinnon.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enerpac Tool Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Enerpac Tool Group has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

Enerpac Tool Group has a net margin of 14.72% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -21.25%. Enerpac Tool Group's return on equity of 23.21% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enerpac Tool Group	14.72%	23.21%	12.10%
Columbus McKinnon	-21.25%	10.02%	2.36%

Summary

Enerpac Tool Group and Columbus McKinnon tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Albany International?

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and Albany International (NYSE:AIN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings and media sentiment.

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Albany International has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 9 more articles in the media than Albany International. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 2 mentions for Albany International. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Albany International's score of 0.00 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Columbus McKinnon	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Albany International	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.4% of Albany International shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Albany International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Albany International pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Columbus McKinnon pays out -3.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Albany International pays out -64.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Albany International has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Albany International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Columbus McKinnon presently has a consensus target price of $23.00, suggesting a potential upside of 40.30%. Albany International has a consensus target price of $61.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.02%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Albany International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Albany International	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80

Albany International has a net margin of -4.18% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -21.25%. Albany International's return on equity of 10.76% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Columbus McKinnon	-21.25%	10.02%	2.36%
Albany International	-4.18%	10.76%	4.64%

Albany International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Albany International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Columbus McKinnon	$1.49B	0.32	-$229.54M	-$7.46	N/A
Albany International	$1.18B	1.45	-$57.34M	-$1.74	N/A

Summary

Columbus McKinnon and Albany International tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to CompoSecure?

CompoSecure (NASDAQ:CMPO) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 11 more articles in the media than CompoSecure. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 0 mentions for CompoSecure. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat CompoSecure's score of 0.00 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
CompoSecure	Neutral
Columbus McKinnon	Neutral

CompoSecure has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. CompoSecure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CompoSecure	$160.68M	9.13	-$53.72M	-$2.16	N/A
Columbus McKinnon	$1.49B	0.32	-$229.54M	-$7.46	N/A

CompoSecure presently has a consensus price target of $26.00, indicating a potential upside of 123.94%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $23.00, indicating a potential upside of 40.30%. Given CompoSecure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe CompoSecure is more favorable than Columbus McKinnon.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CompoSecure	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

CompoSecure has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

Columbus McKinnon has a net margin of -21.25% compared to CompoSecure's net margin of -24.53%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 10.02% beat CompoSecure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CompoSecure	-24.53%	-65.50%	26.83%
Columbus McKinnon	-21.25%	10.02%	2.36%

37.6% of CompoSecure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. 52.1% of CompoSecure shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Columbus McKinnon beats CompoSecure on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Columbus McKinnon News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMCO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CMCO vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Columbus McKinnon	Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$473.17M	$11.25B	$10.24B	$13.06B
Dividend Yield	1.75%	2.29%	96.84%	14.03%
P/E Ratio	-2.20	20.67	25.19	25.63
Price / Sales	0.32	62.17	276.95	108.43
Price / Cash	3.43	23.16	23.96	35.00
Price / Book	0.72	4.28	4.83	6.46
Net Income	-$229.54M	$380.78M	$615.66M	$360.36M
7 Day Performance	5.56%	-0.21%	-0.82%	-0.62%
1 Month Performance	-8.93%	-3.11%	-2.65%	-3.30%
1 Year Performance	12.20%	6.88%	3.81%	3.94%

Columbus McKinnon Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CMCO Columbus McKinnon	4.8008 of 5 stars	$16.39 -2.6%	$23.00 +40.3%	+15.2%	$473.17M	$1.49B	N/A	7,300
TKR Timken	4.6764 of 5 stars	$116.58 +1.5%	$145.50 +24.8%	+55.5%	$8.06B	$4.58B	31.53	19,000
ATS ATS	2.7015 of 5 stars	$19.24 +0.4%	$42.50 +120.9%	-25.7%	$1.89B	$2.15B	56.59	7,000	Analyst Downgrade
EPAC Enerpac Tool Group	3.5603 of 5 stars	$35.97 +1.9%	$50.00 +39.0%	-11.0%	$1.84B	$616.90M	20.30	2,100
AIN Albany International	1.2075 of 5 stars	$60.10 +1.3%	$61.00 +1.5%	+14.1%	$1.70B	$1.18B	N/A	5,700	News Coverage

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CMCO) was last updated on 9/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Columbus McKinnon (CMCO) Competitors

CMCO vs. TKR, ATS, EPAC, AIN, and CMPO

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Timken?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to ATS?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Albany International?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to CompoSecure?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CMCO vs. The Competition

Columbus McKinnon Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Columbus McKinnon (CMCO) Competitors

CMCO vs. TKR, ATS, EPAC, AIN, and CMPO

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Timken?

Do analysts rate TKR or CMCO?

Which has more volatility and risk, TKR or CMCO?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in TKR or CMCO?

Is TKR or CMCO a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor TKR or CMCO?

Is TKR or CMCO more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, TKR or CMCO?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to ATS?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, ATS or CMCO?

Which has more risk & volatility, ATS or CMCO?

Do analysts recommend ATS or CMCO?

Does the media prefer ATS or CMCO?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in ATS or CMCO?

Is ATS or CMCO more profitable?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Is EPAC or CMCO a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in EPAC or CMCO?

Does the media prefer EPAC or CMCO?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, EPAC or CMCO?

Do analysts rate EPAC or CMCO?

Which has more risk and volatility, EPAC or CMCO?

Is EPAC or CMCO more profitable?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Albany International?

Which has more volatility and risk, CMCO or AIN?

Does the media prefer CMCO or AIN?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CMCO or AIN?

Is CMCO or AIN a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate CMCO or AIN?

Is CMCO or AIN more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CMCO or AIN?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to CompoSecure?

Does the media refer more to CMPO or CMCO?

Which has better valuation and earnings, CMPO or CMCO?

Do analysts prefer CMPO or CMCO?

Which has more volatility and risk, CMPO or CMCO?

Is CMPO or CMCO more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CMPO or CMCO?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CMCO vs. The Competition

Columbus McKinnon Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools