NASDAQ:CMCO

Columbus McKinnon Competitors

$52.82
+0.57 (+1.09 %)
(As of 04/14/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$52.20
Now: $52.82
$53.51
50-Day Range
$48.93
MA: $52.35
$54.31
52-Week Range
$21.52
Now: $52.82
$57.06
Volume53,865 shs
Average Volume101,955 shs
Market Capitalization$1.27 billion
P/E Ratio72.36
Dividend Yield0.45%
Beta1.51

Competitors

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) Vs. ITW, PH, SWK, IR, DOV, and XYL

Should you be buying CMCO stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "industrial machinery" are considered alternatives and competitors to Columbus McKinnon, including Illinois Tool Works (ITW), Parker-Hannifin (PH), Stanley Black & Decker (SWK), Ingersoll Rand (IR), Dover (DOV), and Xylem (XYL).

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and Illinois Tool Works (NYSE:ITW) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Columbus McKinnon and Illinois Tool Works, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Columbus McKinnon00403.00
Illinois Tool Works111402.19

Columbus McKinnon presently has a consensus target price of $52.40, suggesting a potential downside of 0.80%. Illinois Tool Works has a consensus target price of $210.1250, suggesting a potential downside of 5.19%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Illinois Tool Works.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.4% of Illinois Tool Works shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Illinois Tool Works shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Columbus McKinnon and Illinois Tool Works' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Columbus McKinnon2.54%8.20%3.53%
Illinois Tool Works16.77%80.95%14.37%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Columbus McKinnon and Illinois Tool Works' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Columbus McKinnon$809.16 million1.56$59.67 million$2.7819.00
Illinois Tool Works$14.11 billion4.97$2.52 billion$7.7528.60

Illinois Tool Works has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Illinois Tool Works, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Illinois Tool Works pays an annual dividend of $4.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Columbus McKinnon pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Illinois Tool Works pays out 58.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Columbus McKinnon has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Illinois Tool Works has increased its dividend for 50 consecutive years. Illinois Tool Works is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Volatility and Risk

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its share price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Illinois Tool Works has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its share price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Illinois Tool Works beats Columbus McKinnon on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

77.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Parker-Hannifin pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Parker-Hannifin has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Columbus McKinnon has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Parker-Hannifin and Columbus McKinnon's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Parker-Hannifin8.75%22.77%7.13%
Columbus McKinnon2.54%8.20%3.53%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Parker-Hannifin and Columbus McKinnon, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Parker-Hannifin011302.93
Columbus McKinnon00403.00

Parker-Hannifin presently has a consensus price target of $310.6429, suggesting a potential downside of 2.21%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $52.40, suggesting a potential downside of 0.80%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Parker-Hannifin.

Risk & Volatility

Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.74, suggesting that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Parker-Hannifin and Columbus McKinnon's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Parker-Hannifin$13.70 billion2.99$1.21 billion$10.7929.44
Columbus McKinnon$809.16 million1.56$59.67 million$2.7819.00

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Columbus McKinnon on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Stanley Black & Decker and Columbus McKinnon, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Stanley Black & Decker04902.69
Columbus McKinnon00403.00

Stanley Black & Decker presently has a consensus target price of $191.1538, indicating a potential downside of 5.10%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $52.40, indicating a potential downside of 0.80%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Stanley Black & Decker.

Risk and Volatility

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.47, indicating that its share price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.51, indicating that its share price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Stanley Black & Decker and Columbus McKinnon's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Stanley Black & Decker6.98%15.05%5.46%
Columbus McKinnon2.54%8.20%3.53%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

85.4% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Stanley Black & Decker pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Stanley Black & Decker has raised its dividend for 54 consecutive years and Columbus McKinnon has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Stanley Black & Decker is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Stanley Black & Decker and Columbus McKinnon's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Stanley Black & Decker$14.44 billion2.24$955.80 million$8.4023.98
Columbus McKinnon$809.16 million1.56$59.67 million$2.7819.00

Stanley Black & Decker has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stanley Black & Decker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Stanley Black & Decker beats Columbus McKinnon on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Columbus McKinnon and Ingersoll Rand's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Columbus McKinnon2.54%8.20%3.53%
Ingersoll Rand-3.97%-2.27%-1.25%

Volatility & Risk

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.51, meaning that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.53, meaning that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Columbus McKinnon and Ingersoll Rand's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Columbus McKinnon$809.16 million1.56$59.67 million$2.7819.00
Ingersoll Rand$2.45 billion8.44$159.10 million$0.7665.00

Ingersoll Rand has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingersoll Rand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Columbus McKinnon and Ingersoll Rand, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Columbus McKinnon00403.00
Ingersoll Rand05802.62

Columbus McKinnon currently has a consensus price target of $52.40, suggesting a potential downside of 0.80%. Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $47.3846, suggesting a potential downside of 4.08%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Ingersoll Rand.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.9% of Ingersoll Rand shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Ingersoll Rand shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Columbus McKinnon beats Ingersoll Rand on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dover (NYSE:DOV) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Dividends

Dover pays an annual dividend of $1.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Dover pays out 33.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Dover has raised its dividend for 59 consecutive years and Columbus McKinnon has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Dover is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Dover and Columbus McKinnon, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Dover05402.44
Columbus McKinnon00403.00

Dover presently has a consensus price target of $132.25, suggesting a potential downside of 4.37%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $52.40, suggesting a potential downside of 0.80%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Dover.

Volatility and Risk

Dover has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.51, indicating that its share price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dover and Columbus McKinnon's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Dover10.02%26.73%9.24%
Columbus McKinnon2.54%8.20%3.53%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Dover and Columbus McKinnon's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dover$7.14 billion2.79$677.92 million$5.9323.32
Columbus McKinnon$809.16 million1.56$59.67 million$2.7819.00

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dover, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

82.7% of Dover shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Dover shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Dover beats Columbus McKinnon on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Xylem (NYSE:XYL) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Xylem and Columbus McKinnon's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Xylem5.09%14.72%5.44%
Columbus McKinnon2.54%8.20%3.53%

Volatility and Risk

Xylem has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.51, meaning that its share price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

84.9% of Xylem shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Xylem shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Xylem and Columbus McKinnon's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Xylem$5.25 billion3.70$401 million$3.0235.70
Columbus McKinnon$809.16 million1.56$59.67 million$2.7819.00

Xylem has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xylem, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Xylem and Columbus McKinnon, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Xylem28302.08
Columbus McKinnon00403.00

Xylem presently has a consensus price target of $84.5455, indicating a potential downside of 21.57%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $52.40, indicating a potential downside of 0.80%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Xylem.

Dividends

Xylem pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Xylem pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Xylem has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Columbus McKinnon has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Xylem beats Columbus McKinnon on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.


Columbus McKinnon Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Illinois Tool Works logo
ITW
Illinois Tool Works
2.5$221.62+0.1%$70.14 billion$14.11 billion33.58Analyst Report
News Coverage
Parker-Hannifin logo
PH
Parker-Hannifin
2.1$317.67+0.6%$41.01 billion$13.70 billion34.76Analyst Report
News Coverage
Stanley Black & Decker logo
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker
2.3$201.43+0.5%$32.41 billion$14.44 billion32.70Analyst Report
News Coverage
Ingersoll Rand logo
IR
Ingersoll Rand
1.4$49.40+0.3%$20.69 billion$2.45 billion-133.51Analyst Report
Dover logo
DOV
Dover
2.1$138.30+0.3%$19.90 billion$7.14 billion30.07Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Xylem logo
XYL
Xylem
1.7$107.80+0.6%$19.44 billion$5.25 billion77.55Increase in Short Interest
IDEX logo
IEX
IDEX
1.8$215.47+0.5%$16.36 billion$2.49 billion44.06
Snap-on logo
SNA
Snap-on
2.3$233.25+0.1%$12.70 billion$3.73 billion21.80Insider Selling
Graco logo
GGG
Graco
1.8$73.38+0.1%$12.39 billion$1.65 billion42.17Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Nordson logo
NDSN
Nordson
2.1$203.47+0.8%$11.82 billion$2.12 billion47.65Decrease in Short Interest
Pentair logo
PNR
Pentair
2.0$62.27+0.1%$10.34 billion$2.96 billion29.65Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
The Middleby logo
MIDD
The Middleby
1.4$164.01+0.1%$9.13 billion$2.96 billion34.31Analyst Revision
ITT logo
ITT
ITT
1.6$91.71+0.6%$7.93 billion$2.85 billion52.71Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Woodward logo
WWD
Woodward
1.5$122.29+0.4%$7.71 billion$2.90 billion31.52Analyst Revision
Donaldson logo
DCI
Donaldson
1.9$59.56+0.5%$7.51 billion$2.58 billion30.08Analyst Report
Lincoln Electric logo
LECO
Lincoln Electric
2.0$122.58+1.9%$7.31 billion$3.00 billion36.48Analyst Report
News Coverage
The Timken logo
TKR
The Timken
2.4$80.66+0.9%$6.13 billion$3.79 billion17.85Analyst Report
Colfax logo
CFX
Colfax
1.4$44.06+2.5%$5.96 billion$3.33 billion-881.20Analyst Report
Rexnord logo
RXN
Rexnord
1.8$48.42+0.3%$5.82 billion$2.07 billion37.83Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Crane logo
CR
Crane
1.9$94.58+0.3%$5.50 billion$3.28 billion248.90
Chart Industries logo
GTLS
Chart Industries
1.2$142.90+0.4%$5.19 billion$1.30 billion81.66
Flowserve logo
FLS
Flowserve
1.7$39.68+1.8%$5.17 billion$3.94 billion40.08
Valmont Industries logo
VMI
Valmont Industries
1.8$235.06+1.0%$5.00 billion$2.77 billion35.89Upcoming Earnings
RBC Bearings logo
ROLL
RBC Bearings
1.3$195.16+0.8%$4.91 billion$727.46 million45.39News Coverage
John Bean Technologies logo
JBT
John Bean Technologies
1.5$135.13+0.8%$4.29 billion$1.95 billion35.94Analyst Report
News Coverage
Watts Water Technologies logo
WTS
Watts Water Technologies
1.7$118.61+0.4%$3.97 billion$1.60 billion34.89News Coverage
Altra Industrial Motion logo
AIMC
Altra Industrial Motion
1.4$61.06+0.6%$3.96 billion$1.83 billion-203.53
Kennametal logo
KMT
Kennametal
1.3$42.04+1.2%$3.51 billion$1.89 billion-102.54Analyst Report
News Coverage
Proto Labs logo
PRLB
Proto Labs
1.1$108.83+1.9%$3.01 billion$458.73 million51.82
ESCO Technologies logo
ESE
ESCO Technologies
1.5$110.12+0.7%$2.87 billion$732.91 million28.16Analyst Upgrade
Albany International logo
AIN
Albany International
1.5$86.65+1.5%$2.80 billion$1.05 billion28.04
SPX FLOW logo
FLOW
SPX FLOW
1.6$64.79+1.0%$2.76 billion$1.51 billion-16.96News Coverage
Barnes Group logo
B
Barnes Group
1.8$50.61+0.8%$2.56 billion$1.49 billion29.95News Coverage
Mueller Industries logo
MLI
Mueller Industries
2.3$44.41+1.4%$2.54 billion$2.43 billion19.06Upcoming Earnings
Insider Selling
News Coverage
Mueller Water Products logo
MWA
Mueller Water Products
2.0$14.16+1.1%$2.24 billion$964.10 million31.47
Kadant logo
KAI
Kadant
1.8$180.53+0.3%$2.09 billion$704.64 million43.71News Coverage
EnPro Industries logo
NPO
EnPro Industries
2.4$87.02+0.7%$1.79 billion$1.21 billion9.20News Coverage
Tennant logo
TNC
Tennant
1.6$81.49+0.1%$1.51 billion$1.14 billion35.90
Omega Flex logo
OFLX
Omega Flex
0.7$146.85+1.5%$1.48 billion$111.36 million81.13Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling logo
HY
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling
1.1$85.77+1.9%$1.44 billion$3.29 billion52.94
Harsco logo
HSC
Harsco
1.7$18.15+3.4%$1.43 billion$1.50 billion75.63
TriMas logo
TRS
TriMas
1.1$30.98+1.9%$1.34 billion$723.53 million-20.25
Standex International logo
SXI
Standex International
2.0$95.65+1.1%$1.18 billion$604.53 million67.36Decrease in Short Interest
Piedmont Lithium logo
PLL
Piedmont Lithium
0.9$68.00+2.2%$1.07 billionN/A-100.00
Energy Recovery logo
ERII
Energy Recovery
1.0$18.50+1.4%$1.06 billion$86.94 million46.25
DMC Global logo
BOOM
DMC Global
1.1$56.98+8.8%$899.89 million$397.55 million-146.10Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
The Gorman-Rupp logo
GRC
The Gorman-Rupp
1.1$33.42+0.1%$872.56 million$398.18 million32.45
CIRCOR International logo
CIR
CIRCOR International
1.5$33.68+1.9%$678.82 million$964.31 million-3.97Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
The ExOne logo
XONE
The ExOne
1.4$26.72+2.9%$589.82 million$53.28 million-30.36
Lydall logo
LDL
Lydall
1.1$31.82+2.7%$573.52 million$837.40 million-3.82
This page was last updated on 4/14/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.