Which has better valuation & earnings, CMCO or TKR?

Timken has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Timken, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Columbus McKinnon $1.19B 0.45 -$229.54M -$7.46 N/A Timken $4.58B 1.88 $288.40M $3.69 33.61

Does the media refer more to CMCO or TKR?

In the previous week, Timken had 4 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Timken and 5 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Timken's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 1.31 indicating that Timken is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Columbus McKinnon 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Timken 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer GRC or CMCO?

Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $23.00, indicating a potential upside of 22.86%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Gorman-Rupp. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gorman-Rupp 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 Columbus McKinnon 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 2 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.80

Does the media favor CMCO or EPAC?

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 2 more articles in the media than Enerpac Tool Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 3 mentions for Enerpac Tool Group. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Enerpac Tool Group's score of 0.75 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Columbus McKinnon 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Enerpac Tool Group 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer PRLB or CMCO?

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 1 more articles in the media than Proto Labs. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 4 mentions for Proto Labs. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Proto Labs' score of 1.17 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Proto Labs 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Columbus McKinnon 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better valuation and earnings, ATS or CMCO?

ATS has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ATS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ATS $2.15B 0.89 $51.85M $0.34 57.38 Columbus McKinnon $1.19B 0.45 -$229.54M -$7.46 N/A

Is ATS or CMCO more profitable?

ATS has a net margin of 1.60% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -21.25%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 10.02% beat ATS's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ATS 1.60% 8.96% 3.63% Columbus McKinnon -21.25% 10.02% 2.36%

Does the media prefer ATS or CMCO?

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 2 more articles in the media than ATS. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 3 mentions for ATS. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat ATS's score of 0.04 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ATS 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Columbus McKinnon 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Columbus McKinnon (CMCO) Competitors

$18.72 -0.12 (-0.64%)

As of 12:02 PM Eastern

Compare

CMCO vs. TKR, GRC, EPAC, PRLB, and ATS

Should you buy Columbus McKinnon stock or one of its competitors? Columbus McKinnon's main competitors and comparable companies include Timken (TKR), Gorman-Rupp (GRC), Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC), Proto Labs (PRLB), and ATS (ATS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Timken?

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and Timken (NYSE:TKR) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Timken had 4 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Timken and 5 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Timken's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 1.31 indicating that Timken is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Columbus McKinnon	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Timken	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Columbus McKinnon currently has a consensus price target of $23.00, indicating a potential upside of 22.86%. Timken has a consensus price target of $145.50, indicating a potential upside of 17.31%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Timken.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Timken	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70

Timken has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Timken, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Columbus McKinnon	$1.19B	0.45	-$229.54M	-$7.46	N/A
Timken	$4.58B	1.88	$288.40M	$3.69	33.61

96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Timken shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Timken shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Timken has a net margin of 5.43% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -21.25%. Timken's return on equity of 12.63% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Columbus McKinnon	-21.25%	10.02%	2.36%
Timken	5.43%	12.63%	6.21%

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Timken has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Timken pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Columbus McKinnon pays out -3.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Timken pays out 39.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Timken has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Columbus McKinnon is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Timken beats Columbus McKinnon on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Gorman-Rupp?

Gorman-Rupp (NYSE:GRC) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Gorman-Rupp has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gorman-Rupp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gorman-Rupp	$682.39M	2.93	$53.02M	$2.37	31.92
Columbus McKinnon	$1.19B	0.45	-$229.54M	-$7.46	N/A

59.3% of Gorman-Rupp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.6% of Gorman-Rupp shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 5 more articles in the media than Gorman-Rupp. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 0 mentions for Gorman-Rupp. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Gorman-Rupp's score of 1.02 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gorman-Rupp	Positive
Columbus McKinnon	Positive

Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $23.00, indicating a potential upside of 22.86%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Gorman-Rupp.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gorman-Rupp	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Gorman-Rupp pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Gorman-Rupp pays out 32.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out -3.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gorman-Rupp has raised its dividend for 52 consecutive years. Columbus McKinnon is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

Gorman-Rupp has a net margin of 8.88% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -21.25%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 15.55% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gorman-Rupp	8.88%	15.55%	7.59%
Columbus McKinnon	-21.25%	10.02%	2.36%

Summary

Columbus McKinnon beats Gorman-Rupp on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and Enerpac Tool Group (NYSE:EPAC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Enerpac Tool Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Columbus McKinnon pays out -3.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enerpac Tool Group pays out 2.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Columbus McKinnon is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Columbus McKinnon presently has a consensus price target of $23.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.86%. Enerpac Tool Group has a consensus price target of $50.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.11%. Given Enerpac Tool Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Enerpac Tool Group is more favorable than Columbus McKinnon.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Enerpac Tool Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 2 more articles in the media than Enerpac Tool Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 3 mentions for Enerpac Tool Group. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Enerpac Tool Group's score of 0.75 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Columbus McKinnon	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Enerpac Tool Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enerpac Tool Group has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.7% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Enerpac Tool Group has a net margin of 14.72% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -21.25%. Enerpac Tool Group's return on equity of 23.21% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Columbus McKinnon	-21.25%	10.02%	2.36%
Enerpac Tool Group	14.72%	23.21%	12.10%

Enerpac Tool Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enerpac Tool Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Columbus McKinnon	$1.19B	0.45	-$229.54M	-$7.46	N/A
Enerpac Tool Group	$616.90M	3.07	$92.75M	$1.77	20.91

Summary

Columbus McKinnon and Enerpac Tool Group tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Proto Labs?

Proto Labs (NYSE:PRLB) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Proto Labs has a beta of 1.42, indicating that its share price is 42% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

Proto Labs currently has a consensus target price of $89.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.67%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $23.00, indicating a potential upside of 22.86%. Given Columbus McKinnon's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Proto Labs.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Proto Labs	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.25
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

84.5% of Proto Labs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Proto Labs shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 1 more articles in the media than Proto Labs. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 4 mentions for Proto Labs. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Proto Labs' score of 1.17 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Proto Labs	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Columbus McKinnon	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Proto Labs has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Proto Labs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Proto Labs	$533.13M	3.67	$21.24M	$1.25	65.52
Columbus McKinnon	$1.19B	0.45	-$229.54M	-$7.46	N/A

Proto Labs has a net margin of 5.44% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -21.25%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 10.02% beat Proto Labs' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Proto Labs	5.44%	4.80%	4.22%
Columbus McKinnon	-21.25%	10.02%	2.36%

Summary

Proto Labs beats Columbus McKinnon on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to ATS?

ATS (NYSE:ATS) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

ATS currently has a consensus price target of $42.50, indicating a potential upside of 117.84%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $23.00, indicating a potential upside of 22.86%. Given ATS's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe ATS is more favorable than Columbus McKinnon.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ATS	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

ATS has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ATS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ATS	$2.15B	0.89	$51.85M	$0.34	57.38
Columbus McKinnon	$1.19B	0.45	-$229.54M	-$7.46	N/A

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 2 more articles in the media than ATS. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 3 mentions for ATS. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat ATS's score of 0.04 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ATS	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Columbus McKinnon	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

75.8% of ATS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ATS has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

ATS has a net margin of 1.60% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -21.25%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 10.02% beat ATS's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ATS	1.60%	8.96%	3.63%
Columbus McKinnon	-21.25%	10.02%	2.36%

Summary

ATS beats Columbus McKinnon on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Columbus McKinnon News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMCO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CMCO vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Columbus McKinnon	Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$540.35M	$11.46B	$10.47B	$12.90B
Dividend Yield	1.49%	2.23%	97.15%	9.14%
P/E Ratio	-2.51	20.79	25.88	25.42
Price / Sales	0.45	64.64	389.49	93.88
Price / Cash	3.84	23.39	24.20	35.62
Price / Book	0.82	4.39	5.01	6.44
Net Income	-$229.54M	$365.71M	$611.74M	$358.18M
7 Day Performance	8.46%	1.59%	1.07%	1.10%
1 Month Performance	-7.42%	-0.38%	-2.01%	-0.41%
1 Year Performance	25.55%	11.00%	9.59%	13.98%

Columbus McKinnon Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CMCO Columbus McKinnon	4.864 of 5 stars	$18.72 -0.6%	$23.00 +22.9%	+26.5%	$540.35M	$1.19B	N/A	7,300	Positive News Gap Down
TKR Timken	4.8474 of 5 stars	$119.30 -1.0%	$145.50 +22.0%	+58.4%	$8.26B	$4.58B	32.31	19,000	Positive News
GRC Gorman-Rupp	3.3381 of 5 stars	$74.38 -1.4%	N/A	+74.2%	$1.95B	$682.39M	31.20	1,415	Positive News
EPAC Enerpac Tool Group	4.2606 of 5 stars	$36.79 -2.2%	$50.00 +35.9%	-12.5%	$1.88B	$616.90M	20.79	2,100	News Coverage Positive News
PRLB Proto Labs	3.5807 of 5 stars	$78.51 -1.5%	$89.00 +13.4%	+63.9%	$1.88B	$533.13M	62.80	2,280	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CMCO) was last updated on 9/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Columbus McKinnon (CMCO) Competitors

CMCO vs. TKR, GRC, EPAC, PRLB, and ATS

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Timken?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Gorman-Rupp?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Proto Labs?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to ATS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CMCO vs. The Competition

Columbus McKinnon Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Columbus McKinnon (CMCO) Competitors

CMCO vs. TKR, GRC, EPAC, PRLB, and ATS

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Timken?

Does the media refer more to CMCO or TKR?

Do analysts rate CMCO or TKR?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CMCO or TKR?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CMCO or TKR?

Is CMCO or TKR more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, CMCO or TKR?

Is CMCO or TKR a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Gorman-Rupp?

Which has better earnings and valuation, GRC or CMCO?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in GRC or CMCO?

Does the media favor GRC or CMCO?

Do analysts prefer GRC or CMCO?

Is GRC or CMCO a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, GRC or CMCO?

Is GRC or CMCO more profitable?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Is CMCO or EPAC a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate CMCO or EPAC?

Does the media favor CMCO or EPAC?

Which has more volatility and risk, CMCO or EPAC?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of CMCO or EPAC?

Is CMCO or EPAC more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, CMCO or EPAC?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Proto Labs?

Which has more volatility & risk, PRLB or CMCO?

Do analysts prefer PRLB or CMCO?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PRLB or CMCO?

Does the media prefer PRLB or CMCO?

Which has better earnings & valuation, PRLB or CMCO?

Is PRLB or CMCO more profitable?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to ATS?

Do analysts recommend ATS or CMCO?

Which has better valuation and earnings, ATS or CMCO?

Does the media prefer ATS or CMCO?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in ATS or CMCO?

Which has more risk & volatility, ATS or CMCO?

Is ATS or CMCO more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CMCO vs. The Competition

Columbus McKinnon Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools