Free Trial

Columbus McKinnon (CMCO) Competitors

Columbus McKinnon logo
$12.88 -1.20 (-8.52%)
Closing price 06/5/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$12.78 -0.10 (-0.77%)
As of 06/5/2026 07:35 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CMCO vs. TKR, PRLB, TNC, TRS, and GHM

Should you buy Columbus McKinnon stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Columbus McKinnon with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Columbus McKinnon include Timken (TKR), Proto Labs (PRLB), Tennant (TNC), TriMas (TRS), and Graham (GHM). These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery" industry.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Timken?

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and Timken (NYSE:TKR) are both industrial machinery companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Timken has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Timken, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Columbus McKinnon$1.19B0.31-$5.14M-$5.48N/A
Timken$4.58B2.00$288.40M$4.4030.01

Timken has a net margin of 6.60% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.23%. Timken's return on equity of 11.84% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Columbus McKinnon-19.23% 6.59% 3.41%
Timken 6.60%11.84%5.79%

96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Timken shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Timken shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Timken pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Columbus McKinnon pays out -5.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Timken pays out 32.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Timken has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Columbus McKinnon is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Columbus McKinnon presently has a consensus price target of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 82.45%. Timken has a consensus price target of $140.38, suggesting a potential upside of 6.31%. Given Columbus McKinnon's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Timken.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Timken
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 9 more articles in the media than Timken. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 6 mentions for Timken. Timken's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of -0.12 indicating that Timken is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Columbus McKinnon
0 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Timken
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Timken has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Timken beats Columbus McKinnon on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Proto Labs?

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and Proto Labs (NYSE:PRLB) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Proto Labs has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Proto Labs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Columbus McKinnon$1.19B0.31-$5.14M-$5.48N/A
Proto Labs$533.13M3.25$21.24M$1.0668.73

Proto Labs has a net margin of 4.71% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.23%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 6.59% beat Proto Labs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Columbus McKinnon-19.23% 6.59% 3.41%
Proto Labs 4.71%4.15%3.66%

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Proto Labs has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Proto Labs shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Proto Labs shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Columbus McKinnon presently has a consensus price target of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 82.45%. Proto Labs has a consensus price target of $53.33, suggesting a potential downside of 26.79%. Given Columbus McKinnon's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Proto Labs.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Proto Labs
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 11 more articles in the media than Proto Labs. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 4 mentions for Proto Labs. Proto Labs' average media sentiment score of 0.05 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of -0.12 indicating that Proto Labs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Columbus McKinnon
0 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Proto Labs
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Proto Labs beats Columbus McKinnon on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Tennant?

Tennant (NYSE:TNC) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

93.3% of Tennant shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.5% of Tennant shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tennant has a net margin of 2.55% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.23%. Tennant's return on equity of 14.87% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tennant2.55% 14.87% 7.17%
Columbus McKinnon -19.23%6.59%3.41%

Tennant pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Tennant pays out 74.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out -5.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tennant has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years. Columbus McKinnon is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Tennant currently has a consensus price target of $91.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.53%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 82.45%. Given Columbus McKinnon's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Tennant.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tennant
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 12 more articles in the media than Tennant. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 3 mentions for Tennant. Tennant's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of -0.12 indicating that Tennant is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tennant
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Columbus McKinnon
0 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Tennant has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Tennant has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tennant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tennant$1.20B1.19$43.80M$1.6650.51
Columbus McKinnon$1.19B0.31-$5.14M-$5.48N/A

Summary

Tennant beats Columbus McKinnon on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to TriMas?

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and TriMas (NASDAQ:TRS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability and dividends.

TriMas has a net margin of 93.79% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.23%. TriMas' return on equity of 8.38% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Columbus McKinnon-19.23% 6.59% 3.41%
TriMas 93.79%8.38%4.53%

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TriMas has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 15 more articles in the media than TriMas. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 0 mentions for TriMas. TriMas' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of -0.12 indicating that TriMas is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Columbus McKinnon Neutral
TriMas Neutral

96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.4% of TriMas shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of TriMas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

TriMas has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TriMas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Columbus McKinnon$1.19B0.31-$5.14M-$5.48N/A
TriMas$1.04B1.35$120.14M$24.071.63

Columbus McKinnon presently has a consensus price target of $23.50, indicating a potential upside of 82.45%. TriMas has a consensus price target of $41.50, indicating a potential upside of 5.95%. Given Columbus McKinnon's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than TriMas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
TriMas
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. TriMas pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Columbus McKinnon pays out -5.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TriMas pays out 0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Columbus McKinnon is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

TriMas beats Columbus McKinnon on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Graham?

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and Graham (NYSE:GHM) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Columbus McKinnon currently has a consensus target price of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 82.45%. Graham has a consensus target price of $81.67, suggesting a potential downside of 23.54%. Given Columbus McKinnon's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Graham.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Graham
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

Graham has a net margin of 6.28% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.23%. Graham's return on equity of 13.26% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Columbus McKinnon-19.23% 6.59% 3.41%
Graham 6.28%13.26%6.07%

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 3 more articles in the media than Graham. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 12 mentions for Graham. Graham's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of -0.12 indicating that Graham is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Columbus McKinnon
0 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Graham
3 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Graham has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Graham, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Columbus McKinnon$1.19B0.31-$5.14M-$5.48N/A
Graham$209.90M5.94$12.23M$1.3579.11

96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.5% of Graham shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.0% of Graham shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Graham has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Graham beats Columbus McKinnon on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Columbus McKinnon News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMCO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMCO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMCO vs. The Competition

MetricColumbus McKinnonMACH IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$370.16M$15.35B$9.38B$11.99B
Dividend Yield1.99%1.06%3.54%5.55%
P/E Ratio-2.3551.3524.9923.63
Price / Sales0.315.375,041.06112.11
Price / Cash8.0926.7627.8854.60
Price / Book0.426.094.796.35
Net Income-$5.14M$295.37M$794.09M$337.59M
7 Day Performance-19.30%-5.66%1.67%-2.52%
1 Month Performance-18.48%-10.13%3.09%-0.03%
1 Year Performance-16.09%9.33%29.84%25.34%

Columbus McKinnon Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon
4.1518 of 5 stars
$12.88
-8.5%
$23.50
+82.5%
-16.1%$370.16M$1.19BN/A3,478
TKR
Timken
4.9017 of 5 stars
$126.56
-1.1%
$139.13
+9.9%
+83.8%$8.89B$4.58B28.7619,000
PRLB
Proto Labs
2.3855 of 5 stars
$75.73
0.0%
$53.33
-29.6%
+90.3%$1.80B$533.13M71.442,280
TNC
Tennant
3.6289 of 5 stars
$85.59
-0.6%
$91.00
+6.3%
+12.4%$1.47B$1.20B51.564,484
TRS
TriMas
2.3577 of 5 stars
$39.99
-2.3%
$41.50
+3.8%
+51.0%$1.47B$661.54M1.663,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CMCO) was last updated on 6/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners