Free Trial

Columbus McKinnon (CMCO) Competitors

Columbus McKinnon logo
$15.93 +0.13 (+0.82%)
Closing price 05/8/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$16.00 +0.07 (+0.47%)
As of 05/8/2026 05:40 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CMCO vs. TKR, AIN, PRLB, TNC, and TRS

Should you be buying Columbus McKinnon stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Columbus McKinnon include Timken (TKR), Albany International (AIN), Proto Labs (PRLB), Tennant (TNC), and TriMas (TRS). These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery" industry.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Timken?

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and Timken (NYSE:TKR) are both industrial machinery companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Timken has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Timken shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Timken shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Timken has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Timken is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Columbus McKinnon$963.03M0.48-$5.14M$0.2175.86
Timken$4.58B1.79$288.40M$4.4026.81

Columbus McKinnon currently has a consensus target price of $23.50, indicating a potential upside of 47.52%. Timken has a consensus target price of $115.88, indicating a potential downside of 1.77%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Timken.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Timken
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

Timken has a net margin of 6.60% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of 0.60%. Timken's return on equity of 11.84% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Columbus McKinnon0.60% 7.41% 3.82%
Timken 6.60%11.84%5.79%

In the previous week, Timken had 18 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Timken and 2 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Timken's score of 0.78 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Columbus McKinnon
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Timken
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Timken pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Columbus McKinnon pays out 133.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Timken pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Timken has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years.

Summary

Timken beats Columbus McKinnon on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Albany International?

Albany International (NYSE:AIN) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Albany International pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Albany International pays out -54.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out 133.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Albany International has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Albany International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Albany International has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Columbus McKinnon has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Albany International. Albany International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Albany International$1.18B1.49-$57.34M-$2.04N/A
Columbus McKinnon$963.03M0.48-$5.14M$0.2175.86

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 1 more articles in the media than Albany International. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 1 mentions for Albany International. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Albany International's score of 0.63 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Albany International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Columbus McKinnon
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Columbus McKinnon has a net margin of 0.60% compared to Albany International's net margin of -4.93%. Albany International's return on equity of 9.44% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Albany International-4.93% 9.44% 4.26%
Columbus McKinnon 0.60%7.41%3.82%

97.4% of Albany International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Albany International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Albany International currently has a consensus target price of $61.50, indicating a potential downside of 1.53%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $23.50, indicating a potential upside of 47.52%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Albany International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Albany International
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Summary

Columbus McKinnon beats Albany International on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Proto Labs?

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and Proto Labs (NYSE:PRLB) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, Proto Labs had 9 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Proto Labs and 2 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Proto Labs' score of 0.35 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Columbus McKinnon
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Proto Labs
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Proto Labs has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Columbus McKinnon presently has a consensus target price of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 47.52%. Proto Labs has a consensus target price of $53.33, suggesting a potential downside of 22.84%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Proto Labs.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Proto Labs
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Proto Labs has a net margin of 4.71% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of 0.60%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 7.41% beat Proto Labs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Columbus McKinnon0.60% 7.41% 3.82%
Proto Labs 4.71%4.15%3.66%

Proto Labs has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Proto Labs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Columbus McKinnon$963.03M0.48-$5.14M$0.2175.86
Proto Labs$533.13M3.08$21.24M$1.0665.21

96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Proto Labs shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Proto Labs shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Columbus McKinnon beats Proto Labs on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Tennant?

Tennant (NYSE:TNC) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Tennant currently has a consensus price target of $91.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.64%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 47.52%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Tennant.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tennant
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Tennant has a net margin of 2.55% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of 0.60%. Tennant's return on equity of 14.87% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tennant2.55% 14.87% 7.17%
Columbus McKinnon 0.60%7.41%3.82%

Tennant has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

93.3% of Tennant shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.5% of Tennant shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tennant has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Tennant is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tennant$1.20B1.23$43.80M$1.6652.39
Columbus McKinnon$963.03M0.48-$5.14M$0.2175.86

In the previous week, Tennant had 34 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for Tennant and 2 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Tennant's score of 0.47 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tennant
5 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
16 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Columbus McKinnon
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Tennant pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Tennant pays out 74.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out 133.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Tennant has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years.

Summary

Tennant beats Columbus McKinnon on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to TriMas?

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and TriMas (NASDAQ:TRS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

TriMas has a net margin of 93.79% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of 0.60%. TriMas' return on equity of 8.38% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Columbus McKinnon0.60% 7.41% 3.82%
TriMas 93.79%8.38%4.53%

96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.4% of TriMas shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of TriMas shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TriMas has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its share price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Columbus McKinnon presently has a consensus price target of $23.50, indicating a potential upside of 47.52%. TriMas has a consensus price target of $41.50, indicating a potential downside of 2.86%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than TriMas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
TriMas
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

TriMas has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. TriMas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Columbus McKinnon$963.03M0.48-$5.14M$0.2175.86
TriMas$1.04B1.47$120.14M$24.071.77

Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. TriMas pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Columbus McKinnon pays out 133.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TriMas pays out 0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, TriMas had 3 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for TriMas and 2 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat TriMas' score of 0.72 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Columbus McKinnon
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TriMas
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

TriMas beats Columbus McKinnon on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Columbus McKinnon News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMCO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMCO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMCO vs. The Competition

MetricColumbus McKinnonMACH IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$454.08M$17.52B$9.30B$12.12B
Dividend Yield1.77%0.99%3.56%5.20%
P/E Ratio75.8668.0825.2025.39
Price / Sales0.486.345,636.4175.96
Price / Cash9.9333.9127.8753.47
Price / Book0.528.504.646.81
Net Income-$5.14M$297.31M$792.42M$333.04M
7 Day Performance3.58%3.11%1.20%3.17%
1 Month Performance2.25%7.11%5.32%7.14%
1 Year Performance-3.57%27.64%40.92%41.22%

Columbus McKinnon Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon
3.7634 of 5 stars
$15.93
+0.8%
$23.50
+47.5%
N/A$454.08M$963.03M75.863,478
TKR
Timken
4.0202 of 5 stars
$107.03
-1.8%
$105.86
-1.1%
N/A$7.61B$4.58B26.0419,000
AIN
Albany International
1.4046 of 5 stars
$57.19
-1.9%
$61.50
+7.5%
N/A$1.65B$1.18BN/A5,700
PRLB
Proto Labs
1.8226 of 5 stars
$64.67
-0.8%
$53.33
-17.5%
N/A$1.55B$533.13M61.012,280
TNC
Tennant
4.2645 of 5 stars
$81.80
-1.2%
$91.00
+11.3%
N/A$1.49B$1.20B34.964,484

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CMCO) was last updated on 5/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners