Go Pro

Columbus McKinnon (CMCO) Competitors

Columbus McKinnon logo
$16.21 -0.17 (-1.04%)
Closing price 07/28/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$16.24 +0.02 (+0.15%)
As of 08:01 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CMCO vs. TKR, TNC, TRS, GHM, and HY

Should you buy Columbus McKinnon stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Columbus McKinnon with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Columbus McKinnon include Timken (TKR), Tennant (TNC), TriMas (TRS), Graham (GHM), and Hyster-Yale (HY). These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery" industry.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Timken?

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and Timken (NYSE:TKR) are both industrial machinery companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Columbus McKinnon currently has a consensus price target of $22.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.72%. Timken has a consensus price target of $150.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.29%. Given Columbus McKinnon's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Timken.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Timken
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, Timken had 8 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Timken and 6 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Timken's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.74 indicating that Timken is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Columbus McKinnon
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Timken
11 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Timken shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Timken shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Timken has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Timken, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Columbus McKinnon$1.19B0.39-$229.54M-$5.48N/A
Timken$4.58B2.12$288.40M$4.4031.77

Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Timken pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Columbus McKinnon pays out -5.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Timken pays out 32.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Timken has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Columbus McKinnon is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Timken has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Timken has a net margin of 6.60% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.23%. Timken's return on equity of 11.84% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Columbus McKinnon-19.23% 7.09% 2.39%
Timken 6.60%11.84%5.79%

Summary

Timken beats Columbus McKinnon on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Tennant?

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and Tennant (NYSE:TNC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, Tennant had 2 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Tennant and 6 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Tennant's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.74 indicating that Tennant is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Columbus McKinnon
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Tennant
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of Tennant shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.5% of Tennant shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tennant has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tennant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Columbus McKinnon$1.19B0.39-$229.54M-$5.48N/A
Tennant$1.20B1.25$43.80M$1.6653.21

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tennant has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Columbus McKinnon presently has a consensus price target of $22.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.72%. Tennant has a consensus price target of $91.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.03%. Given Columbus McKinnon's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Tennant.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Tennant
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Tennant has a net margin of 2.55% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.23%. Tennant's return on equity of 14.87% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Columbus McKinnon-19.23% 7.09% 2.39%
Tennant 2.55%14.87%7.17%

Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Tennant pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Columbus McKinnon pays out -5.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tennant pays out 74.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tennant has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years. Columbus McKinnon is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Tennant beats Columbus McKinnon on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to TriMas?

TriMas (NASDAQ:TRS) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

99.4% of TriMas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. 17.5% of TriMas shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

TriMas has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

TriMas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TriMas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TriMas$1.04B1.38$120.14M$24.071.67
Columbus McKinnon$1.19B0.39-$229.54M-$5.48N/A

TriMas has a net margin of 93.79% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.23%. TriMas' return on equity of 8.38% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TriMas93.79% 8.38% 4.53%
Columbus McKinnon -19.23%7.09%2.39%

In the previous week, TriMas had 11 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for TriMas and 6 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat TriMas' score of 0.52 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TriMas
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Columbus McKinnon
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

TriMas currently has a consensus price target of $41.50, indicating a potential upside of 3.18%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $22.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.72%. Given Columbus McKinnon's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than TriMas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TriMas
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

TriMas pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. TriMas pays out 0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out -5.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Columbus McKinnon is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

TriMas beats Columbus McKinnon on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Graham?

Graham (NYSE:GHM) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation and risk.

Graham has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Graham, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Graham$245.29M4.78$12.50M$1.1388.39
Columbus McKinnon$1.19B0.39-$229.54M-$5.48N/A

Graham currently has a consensus price target of $132.50, suggesting a potential upside of 32.65%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $22.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.72%. Given Columbus McKinnon's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Graham.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Graham
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

69.5% of Graham shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Graham shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Graham has a net margin of 5.10% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.23%. Graham's return on equity of 11.94% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Graham5.10% 11.94% 5.40%
Columbus McKinnon -19.23%7.09%2.39%

Graham pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Graham pays out 38.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out -5.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Columbus McKinnon is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 2 more articles in the media than Graham. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 4 mentions for Graham. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Graham's score of -0.03 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Graham
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Columbus McKinnon
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Graham has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Graham and Columbus McKinnon tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Hyster-Yale?

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and Hyster-Yale (NYSE:HY) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Hyster-Yale has a net margin of -2.71% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.23%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 7.09% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Columbus McKinnon-19.23% 7.09% 2.39%
Hyster-Yale -2.71%-13.96%-3.44%

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 3 more articles in the media than Hyster-Yale. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 3 mentions for Hyster-Yale. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Hyster-Yale's score of 0.00 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Columbus McKinnon
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hyster-Yale
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hyster-Yale has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

Columbus McKinnon presently has a consensus target price of $22.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.72%. Hyster-Yale has a consensus target price of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 31.34%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Hyster-Yale.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Hyster-Yale
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.5% of Hyster-Yale shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 37.8% of Hyster-Yale shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Hyster-Yale pays an annual dividend of $1.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Columbus McKinnon pays out -5.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hyster-Yale pays out -26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hyster-Yale has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Hyster-Yale is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Hyster-Yale has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Hyster-Yale is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Columbus McKinnon$1.19B0.39-$229.54M-$5.48N/A
Hyster-Yale$3.77B0.16-$60.10M-$5.59N/A

Summary

Columbus McKinnon beats Hyster-Yale on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Columbus McKinnon News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMCO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMCO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMCO vs. The Competition

MetricColumbus McKinnonMACH IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$472.20M$13.52B$9.44B$12.19B
Dividend Yield1.71%1.23%3.49%8.55%
P/E Ratio-2.9637.7126.9523.75
Price / Sales0.394.241,807.63109.45
Price / Cash3.3421.6027.1359.05
Price / Book0.714.944.416.06
Net Income-$229.54M$220.57M$792.89M$336.44M
7 Day Performance3.25%-9.28%0.11%-1.50%
1 Month Performance12.49%-12.18%0.29%-4.62%
1 Year Performance-3.86%4.22%12.91%15.02%

Columbus McKinnon Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon
4.3686 of 5 stars
$16.21
-1.0%
$22.00
+35.7%
+1.5%$472.20M$1.19BN/A7,300
TKR
Timken
4.8009 of 5 stars
$134.32
-2.5%
$149.63
+11.4%
+71.1%$9.57B$4.58B30.5319,000
TNC
Tennant
3.6661 of 5 stars
$85.47
-0.7%
$91.00
+6.5%
+6.5%$1.47B$1.20B51.494,484
TRS
TriMas
3.6062 of 5 stars
$39.93
-1.8%
$41.50
+3.9%
+27.8%$1.46B$661.54M1.663,700
GHM
Graham
3.9403 of 5 stars
$104.99
-2.6%
$132.50
+26.2%
+79.7%$1.26B$245.29M92.91490

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CMCO) was last updated on 7/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners