Do analysts prefer GRC or CMCO?

Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 11.11%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Gorman-Rupp. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gorman-Rupp 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 Columbus McKinnon 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.40

Columbus McKinnon (CMCO) Competitors

$20.61 -0.54 (-2.54%)

As of 11:37 AM Eastern

Compare

CMCO vs. EPAC, AIN, GRC, KMT, and CMPO

Should you buy Columbus McKinnon stock or one of its competitors? Columbus McKinnon's main competitors and comparable companies include Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC), Albany International (AIN), Gorman-Rupp (GRC), Kennametal (KMT), and CompoSecure (CMPO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Enerpac Tool Group (NYSE:EPAC) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Enerpac Tool Group currently has a consensus target price of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.00%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $23.50, indicating a potential upside of 14.04%. Given Enerpac Tool Group's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Enerpac Tool Group is more favorable than Columbus McKinnon.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enerpac Tool Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Enerpac Tool Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enerpac Tool Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enerpac Tool Group	$652.30M	3.10	$89.70M	$1.72	22.89
Columbus McKinnon	$1.77B	0.34	-$229.54M	-$8.38	N/A

In the previous week, Enerpac Tool Group had 4 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Enerpac Tool Group and 1 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Enerpac Tool Group's score of 0.88 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Enerpac Tool Group	Positive
Columbus McKinnon	Positive

Enerpac Tool Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Enerpac Tool Group pays out 2.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out -3.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Columbus McKinnon is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Enerpac Tool Group has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market.

Enerpac Tool Group has a net margin of 13.74% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.61%. Enerpac Tool Group's return on equity of 22.74% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enerpac Tool Group	13.74%	22.74%	11.88%
Columbus McKinnon	-19.61%	13.49%	2.26%

97.7% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Enerpac Tool Group beats Columbus McKinnon on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Albany International?

Albany International (NYSE:AIN) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Albany International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Albany International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Albany International	$1.18B	1.63	-$57.34M	$3.09	21.95
Columbus McKinnon	$1.77B	0.34	-$229.54M	-$8.38	N/A

Albany International has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market.

Albany International has a net margin of 6.73% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.61%. Albany International's return on equity of 14.25% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Albany International	6.73%	14.25%	6.26%
Columbus McKinnon	-19.61%	13.49%	2.26%

Albany International pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Albany International pays out 36.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out -3.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Albany International has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Albany International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

97.4% of Albany International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Albany International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Albany International had 3 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Albany International and 1 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Albany International's score of 0.04 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Albany International	Neutral
Columbus McKinnon	Positive

Albany International currently has a consensus price target of $72.33, indicating a potential upside of 6.65%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $23.50, indicating a potential upside of 14.04%. Given Columbus McKinnon's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Albany International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Albany International	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Summary

Albany International beats Columbus McKinnon on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Gorman-Rupp?

Gorman-Rupp (NYSE:GRC) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.49, indicating that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 1 more articles in the media than Gorman-Rupp. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 0 mentions for Gorman-Rupp. Gorman-Rupp's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.85 indicating that Gorman-Rupp is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gorman-Rupp	Positive
Columbus McKinnon	Positive

Gorman-Rupp has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gorman-Rupp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gorman-Rupp	$682.39M	2.71	$53.02M	$2.80	24.99
Columbus McKinnon	$1.77B	0.35	-$229.54M	-$8.38	N/A

Gorman-Rupp has a net margin of 10.20% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.61%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 17.13% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gorman-Rupp	10.20%	17.13%	8.61%
Columbus McKinnon	-19.61%	13.49%	2.26%

Gorman-Rupp pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Gorman-Rupp pays out 27.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out -3.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gorman-Rupp has increased its dividend for 52 consecutive years. Columbus McKinnon is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

59.3% of Gorman-Rupp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.6% of Gorman-Rupp shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 11.11%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Gorman-Rupp.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gorman-Rupp	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Summary

Gorman-Rupp beats Columbus McKinnon on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Kennametal?

Kennametal (NYSE:KMT) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, Kennametal had 14 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Kennametal and 1 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Kennametal's score of 0.91 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Kennametal	Positive
Columbus McKinnon	Positive

Kennametal pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Kennametal pays out 10.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out -3.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Kennametal has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.49, indicating that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market.

Kennametal has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kennametal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kennametal	$2.36B	0.78	$342.39M	$7.58	3.16
Columbus McKinnon	$1.77B	0.34	-$229.54M	-$8.38	N/A

Kennametal has a net margin of 22.49% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.61%. Kennametal's return on equity of 38.40% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kennametal	22.49%	38.40%	19.36%
Columbus McKinnon	-19.61%	13.49%	2.26%

Kennametal presently has a consensus target price of $32.36, suggesting a potential upside of 35.19%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 14.04%. Given Kennametal's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Kennametal is more favorable than Columbus McKinnon.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kennametal	4 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.56
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Kennametal shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Kennametal beats Columbus McKinnon on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to CompoSecure?

CompoSecure (NASDAQ:CMPO) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

CompoSecure has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.49, indicating that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market.

CompoSecure has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. CompoSecure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CompoSecure	$160.68M	12.08	-$53.72M	-$2.16	N/A
Columbus McKinnon	$1.77B	0.35	-$229.54M	-$8.38	N/A

In the previous week, CompoSecure and CompoSecure both had 1 articles in the media. CompoSecure's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.85 indicating that CompoSecure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
CompoSecure	Positive
Columbus McKinnon	Positive

CompoSecure currently has a consensus target price of $22.00, indicating a potential upside of 43.23%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $23.50, indicating a potential upside of 11.11%. Given CompoSecure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe CompoSecure is more favorable than Columbus McKinnon.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CompoSecure	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

37.6% of CompoSecure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. 52.1% of CompoSecure shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Columbus McKinnon has a net margin of -19.61% compared to CompoSecure's net margin of -24.53%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 13.49% beat CompoSecure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CompoSecure	-24.53%	-65.50%	26.83%
Columbus McKinnon	-19.61%	13.49%	2.26%

Summary

CompoSecure beats Columbus McKinnon on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Columbus McKinnon News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMCO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CMCO vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Columbus McKinnon	Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$598.36M	$10.28B	$10.08B	$12.00B
Dividend Yield	1.38%	2.31%	2.91%	4.50%
P/E Ratio	-2.47	32.65	32.25	30.31
Price / Sales	0.34	2.78	3.16	5.84
Price / Cash	4.45	18.24	19.83	22.80
Price / Book	1.15	3.15	3.78	3.77
Net Income	-$229.54M	$373.63M	$611.94M	$390.69M
7 Day Performance	16.75%	1.61%	0.90%	-0.60%
1 Month Performance	28.49%	-3.15%	-2.57%	-6.88%
1 Year Performance	33.58%	1.31%	2.00%	-6.20%

Columbus McKinnon Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CMCO Columbus McKinnon	3.7298 of 5 stars	$20.61 -2.5%	$23.50 +14.0%	+33.9%	$596.27M	$1.77B	N/A	7,300	Positive News
EPAC Enerpac Tool Group	4.6478 of 5 stars	$40.40 -0.9%	$50.00 +23.8%	-2.2%	$2.07B	$652.30M	23.49	2,100
AIN Albany International	2.5098 of 5 stars	$69.08 -1.3%	$69.00 -0.1%	+47.2%	$1.96B	$1.18B	22.35	5,700	Analyst Forecast
GRC Gorman-Rupp	4.0888 of 5 stars	$69.81 -1.7%	N/A	+56.0%	$1.84B	$682.39M	24.93	1,415	Positive News
KMT Kennametal	4.8467 of 5 stars	$23.84 -1.4%	$33.07 +38.7%	-12.2%	$1.82B	$2.36B	3.15	8,073	Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CMCO) was last updated on 11/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Columbus McKinnon (CMCO) Competitors

CMCO vs. EPAC, AIN, GRC, KMT, and CMPO

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Albany International?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Gorman-Rupp?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Kennametal?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to CompoSecure?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CMCO vs. The Competition

Columbus McKinnon Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Columbus McKinnon (CMCO) Competitors

CMCO vs. EPAC, AIN, GRC, KMT, and CMPO

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Do analysts recommend EPAC or CMCO?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, EPAC or CMCO?

Does the media refer more to EPAC or CMCO?

Is EPAC or CMCO a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, EPAC or CMCO?

Is EPAC or CMCO more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of EPAC or CMCO?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Albany International?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, AIN or CMCO?

Which has more risk and volatility, AIN or CMCO?

Is AIN or CMCO more profitable?

Is AIN or CMCO a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of AIN or CMCO?

Does the media refer more to AIN or CMCO?

Do analysts prefer AIN or CMCO?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Gorman-Rupp?

Which has more risk & volatility, GRC or CMCO?

Does the media refer more to GRC or CMCO?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, GRC or CMCO?

Is GRC or CMCO more profitable?

Is GRC or CMCO a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in GRC or CMCO?

Do analysts prefer GRC or CMCO?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to Kennametal?

Does the media favor KMT or CMCO?

Is KMT or CMCO a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, KMT or CMCO?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, KMT or CMCO?

Is KMT or CMCO more profitable?

Do analysts rate KMT or CMCO?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of KMT or CMCO?

Summary

How does Columbus McKinnon compare to CompoSecure?

Which has more volatility & risk, CMPO or CMCO?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CMPO or CMCO?

Does the media prefer CMPO or CMCO?

Do analysts prefer CMPO or CMCO?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in CMPO or CMCO?

Is CMPO or CMCO more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CMCO vs. The Competition

Columbus McKinnon Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools