Columbus McKinnon Competitors

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and Illinois Tool Works (NYSE:ITW) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Columbus McKinnon and Illinois Tool Works, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Columbus McKinnon presently has a consensus target price of $52.40, suggesting a potential downside of 0.80%. Illinois Tool Works has a consensus target price of $210.1250, suggesting a potential downside of 5.19%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Illinois Tool Works.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.4% of Illinois Tool Works shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Illinois Tool Works shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Columbus McKinnon and Illinois Tool Works' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Columbus McKinnon and Illinois Tool Works' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Illinois Tool Works has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Illinois Tool Works, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Illinois Tool Works pays an annual dividend of $4.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Columbus McKinnon pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Illinois Tool Works pays out 58.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Columbus McKinnon has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Illinois Tool Works has increased its dividend for 50 consecutive years. Illinois Tool Works is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Volatility and Risk

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its share price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Illinois Tool Works has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its share price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Illinois Tool Works beats Columbus McKinnon on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

77.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Parker-Hannifin pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Parker-Hannifin has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Columbus McKinnon has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Parker-Hannifin and Columbus McKinnon's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Parker-Hannifin and Columbus McKinnon, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Parker-Hannifin presently has a consensus price target of $310.6429, suggesting a potential downside of 2.21%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $52.40, suggesting a potential downside of 0.80%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Parker-Hannifin.

Risk & Volatility

Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.74, suggesting that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Parker-Hannifin and Columbus McKinnon's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Columbus McKinnon on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Stanley Black & Decker and Columbus McKinnon, as provided by MarketBeat.

Stanley Black & Decker presently has a consensus target price of $191.1538, indicating a potential downside of 5.10%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $52.40, indicating a potential downside of 0.80%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Stanley Black & Decker.

Risk and Volatility

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.47, indicating that its share price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.51, indicating that its share price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Stanley Black & Decker and Columbus McKinnon's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

85.4% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Stanley Black & Decker pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Stanley Black & Decker has raised its dividend for 54 consecutive years and Columbus McKinnon has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Stanley Black & Decker is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Stanley Black & Decker and Columbus McKinnon's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Stanley Black & Decker has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stanley Black & Decker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Stanley Black & Decker beats Columbus McKinnon on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) and Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Columbus McKinnon and Ingersoll Rand's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.51, meaning that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.53, meaning that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Columbus McKinnon and Ingersoll Rand's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Ingersoll Rand has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingersoll Rand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Columbus McKinnon and Ingersoll Rand, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Columbus McKinnon currently has a consensus price target of $52.40, suggesting a potential downside of 0.80%. Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $47.3846, suggesting a potential downside of 4.08%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Ingersoll Rand.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.9% of Ingersoll Rand shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Ingersoll Rand shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Columbus McKinnon beats Ingersoll Rand on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dover (NYSE:DOV) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Dividends

Dover pays an annual dividend of $1.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Dover pays out 33.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Dover has raised its dividend for 59 consecutive years and Columbus McKinnon has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Dover is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Dover and Columbus McKinnon, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Dover presently has a consensus price target of $132.25, suggesting a potential downside of 4.37%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $52.40, suggesting a potential downside of 0.80%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Dover.

Volatility and Risk

Dover has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.51, indicating that its share price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dover and Columbus McKinnon's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Dover and Columbus McKinnon's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dover, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

82.7% of Dover shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Dover shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Dover beats Columbus McKinnon on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Xylem (NYSE:XYL) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Xylem and Columbus McKinnon's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Xylem has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.51, meaning that its share price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

84.9% of Xylem shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Xylem shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Xylem and Columbus McKinnon's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Xylem has higher revenue and earnings than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xylem, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Xylem and Columbus McKinnon, as provided by MarketBeat.

Xylem presently has a consensus price target of $84.5455, indicating a potential downside of 21.57%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $52.40, indicating a potential downside of 0.80%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Xylem.

Dividends

Xylem pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Xylem pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Xylem has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Columbus McKinnon has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Xylem beats Columbus McKinnon on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.