Gorman-Rupp (GRC) Competitors

Lincoln Electric has a consensus price target of $299.00, indicating a potential upside of 17.89%. Given Lincoln Electric's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Lincoln Electric is more favorable than Gorman-Rupp.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lincoln Electric has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

59.3% of Gorman-Rupp shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.6% of Lincoln Electric shares are held by institutional investors. 11.6% of Gorman-Rupp shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Lincoln Electric shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Lincoln Electric had 6 more articles in the media than Gorman-Rupp. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Lincoln Electric and 0 mentions for Gorman-Rupp. Lincoln Electric's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Gorman-Rupp's score of 0.00 indicating that Lincoln Electric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Lincoln Electric has higher revenue and earnings than Gorman-Rupp. Lincoln Electric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gorman-Rupp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Lincoln Electric has a net margin of 12.38% compared to Gorman-Rupp's net margin of 8.45%. Lincoln Electric's return on equity of 39.33% beat Gorman-Rupp's return on equity.

Gorman-Rupp pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Lincoln Electric pays an annual dividend of $3.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Gorman-Rupp pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lincoln Electric pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gorman-Rupp has increased its dividend for 52 consecutive years and Lincoln Electric has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Lincoln Electric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Industrial Technologies has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Applied Industrial Technologies has a consensus price target of $329.57, suggesting a potential downside of 1.01%. Given Applied Industrial Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Applied Industrial Technologies is more favorable than Gorman-Rupp.

In the previous week, Applied Industrial Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Gorman-Rupp. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Applied Industrial Technologies and 0 mentions for Gorman-Rupp. Applied Industrial Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat Gorman-Rupp's score of 0.00 indicating that Applied Industrial Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Applied Industrial Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Gorman-Rupp. Applied Industrial Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gorman-Rupp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Gorman-Rupp pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Applied Industrial Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Gorman-Rupp pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Industrial Technologies pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gorman-Rupp has increased its dividend for 52 consecutive years and Applied Industrial Technologies has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Gorman-Rupp is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

59.3% of Gorman-Rupp shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.5% of Applied Industrial Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 11.6% of Gorman-Rupp shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Applied Industrial Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gorman-Rupp has a net margin of 8.45% compared to Applied Industrial Technologies' net margin of 8.34%. Applied Industrial Technologies' return on equity of 21.64% beat Gorman-Rupp's return on equity.

In the previous week, Dover had 6 more articles in the media than Gorman-Rupp. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Dover and 0 mentions for Gorman-Rupp. Dover's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Gorman-Rupp's score of 0.00 indicating that Dover is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Dover pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Gorman-Rupp pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Dover pays out 25.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gorman-Rupp pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Dover has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years and Gorman-Rupp has increased its dividend for 52 consecutive years. Dover is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than Gorman-Rupp. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gorman-Rupp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dover has a net margin of 13.30% compared to Gorman-Rupp's net margin of 8.45%. Dover's return on equity of 18.01% beat Gorman-Rupp's return on equity.

Dover has a beta of 1.16, indicating that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

84.5% of Dover shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.3% of Gorman-Rupp shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Dover shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.6% of Gorman-Rupp shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dover currently has a consensus target price of $241.43, suggesting a potential upside of 12.24%. Given Dover's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Dover is more favorable than Gorman-Rupp.

Ingersoll Rand presently has a consensus target price of $92.71, indicating a potential upside of 17.13%. Given Ingersoll Rand's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ingersoll Rand is more favorable than Gorman-Rupp.

Ingersoll Rand has higher revenue and earnings than Gorman-Rupp. Gorman-Rupp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingersoll Rand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Ingersoll Rand had 6 more articles in the media than Gorman-Rupp. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Ingersoll Rand and 0 mentions for Gorman-Rupp. Ingersoll Rand's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Gorman-Rupp's score of 0.00 indicating that Ingersoll Rand is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

95.3% of Ingersoll Rand shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.3% of Gorman-Rupp shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ingersoll Rand shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.6% of Gorman-Rupp shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gorman-Rupp has a net margin of 8.45% compared to Ingersoll Rand's net margin of 7.54%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 15.08% beat Ingersoll Rand's return on equity.

Ingersoll Rand pays an annual dividend of $0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Gorman-Rupp pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Ingersoll Rand pays out 5.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gorman-Rupp pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gorman-Rupp has raised its dividend for 52 consecutive years. Gorman-Rupp is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.