Go Pro

TriMas (TRS) Competitors

TriMas logo
$40.22 -0.34 (-0.84%)
Closing price 07/28/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$40.20 -0.02 (-0.06%)
As of 07/28/2026 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

TRS vs. MWA, SXI, KAI, KMT, and AIN

Should you buy TriMas stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares TriMas with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with TriMas include Mueller Water Products (MWA), Standex International (SXI), Kadant (KAI), Kennametal (KMT), and Albany International (AIN). These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery" industry.

How does TriMas compare to Mueller Water Products?

Mueller Water Products (NYSE:MWA) and TriMas (NASDAQ:TRS) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

Mueller Water Products has higher revenue and earnings than TriMas. TriMas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mueller Water Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mueller Water Products$1.46B2.77$191.70M$1.3119.81
TriMas$1.04B1.38$120.14M$24.071.67

91.7% of Mueller Water Products shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.4% of TriMas shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Mueller Water Products shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of TriMas shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

TriMas has a net margin of 93.79% compared to Mueller Water Products' net margin of 14.17%. Mueller Water Products' return on equity of 22.11% beat TriMas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mueller Water Products14.17% 22.11% 12.11%
TriMas 93.79%8.38%4.53%

Mueller Water Products presently has a consensus target price of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.62%. TriMas has a consensus target price of $41.50, suggesting a potential upside of 3.18%. Given Mueller Water Products' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Mueller Water Products is more favorable than TriMas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mueller Water Products
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
TriMas
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Mueller Water Products pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. TriMas pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Mueller Water Products pays out 21.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TriMas pays out 0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Mueller Water Products has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Mueller Water Products is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Mueller Water Products has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TriMas has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, TriMas had 5 more articles in the media than Mueller Water Products. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for TriMas and 12 mentions for Mueller Water Products. Mueller Water Products' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat TriMas' score of 0.52 indicating that Mueller Water Products is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Mueller Water Products
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TriMas
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Mueller Water Products beats TriMas on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TriMas compare to Standex International?

Standex International (NYSE:SXI) and TriMas (NASDAQ:TRS) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Standex International currently has a consensus target price of $289.67, suggesting a potential downside of 1.32%. TriMas has a consensus target price of $41.50, suggesting a potential upside of 3.18%. Given TriMas' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TriMas is more favorable than Standex International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Standex International
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
TriMas
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Standex International has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TriMas has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, TriMas had 9 more articles in the media than Standex International. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for TriMas and 8 mentions for Standex International. Standex International's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat TriMas' score of 0.52 indicating that Standex International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Standex International
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TriMas
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

TriMas has higher revenue and earnings than Standex International. TriMas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Standex International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Standex International$790.11M4.50$55.76M$8.2135.75
TriMas$1.04B1.38$120.14M$24.071.67

90.4% of Standex International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.4% of TriMas shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of Standex International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of TriMas shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Standex International pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. TriMas pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Standex International pays out 16.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TriMas pays out 0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Standex International has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Standex International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

TriMas has a net margin of 93.79% compared to Standex International's net margin of 11.18%. Standex International's return on equity of 14.38% beat TriMas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Standex International11.18% 14.38% 6.66%
TriMas 93.79%8.38%4.53%

Summary

Standex International beats TriMas on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TriMas compare to Kadant?

TriMas (NASDAQ:TRS) and Kadant (NYSE:KAI) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends and valuation.

TriMas has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kadant has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

TriMas pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Kadant pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. TriMas pays out 0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kadant pays out 16.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kadant has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Kadant is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

TriMas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kadant. TriMas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kadant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TriMas$1.04B1.38$120.14M$24.071.67
Kadant$1.05B3.53$101.97M$8.7735.84

99.4% of TriMas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Kadant shares are held by institutional investors. 17.5% of TriMas shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Kadant shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TriMas has a net margin of 93.79% compared to Kadant's net margin of 9.45%. Kadant's return on equity of 12.13% beat TriMas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TriMas93.79% 8.38% 4.53%
Kadant 9.45%12.13%7.33%

TriMas currently has a consensus target price of $41.50, indicating a potential upside of 3.18%. Kadant has a consensus target price of $341.50, indicating a potential upside of 8.64%. Given Kadant's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kadant is more favorable than TriMas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TriMas
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Kadant
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

In the previous week, TriMas had 15 more articles in the media than Kadant. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for TriMas and 2 mentions for Kadant. Kadant's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat TriMas' score of 0.52 indicating that Kadant is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TriMas
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Kadant
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Kadant beats TriMas on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TriMas compare to Kennametal?

Kennametal (NYSE:KMT) and TriMas (NASDAQ:TRS) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation and risk.

Kennametal currently has a consensus price target of $35.79, suggesting a potential upside of 0.60%. TriMas has a consensus price target of $41.50, suggesting a potential upside of 3.18%. Given TriMas' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe TriMas is more favorable than Kennametal.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kennametal
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
TriMas
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

TriMas has a net margin of 93.79% compared to Kennametal's net margin of 6.41%. Kennametal's return on equity of 11.02% beat TriMas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kennametal6.41% 11.02% 5.73%
TriMas 93.79%8.38%4.53%

Kennametal pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. TriMas pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Kennametal pays out 45.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TriMas pays out 0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, TriMas had 11 more articles in the media than Kennametal. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for TriMas and 6 mentions for Kennametal. Kennametal's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat TriMas' score of 0.52 indicating that Kennametal is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kennametal
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TriMas
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

TriMas has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kennametal. TriMas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kennametal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kennametal$1.97B1.38$93.12M$1.7720.10
TriMas$1.04B1.38$120.14M$24.071.67

99.4% of TriMas shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Kennametal shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of TriMas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kennametal has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TriMas has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

TriMas beats Kennametal on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TriMas compare to Albany International?

Albany International (NYSE:AIN) and TriMas (NASDAQ:TRS) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, TriMas had 12 more articles in the media than Albany International. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for TriMas and 5 mentions for Albany International. Albany International's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat TriMas' score of 0.52 indicating that Albany International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Albany International
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TriMas
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

TriMas has a net margin of 93.79% compared to Albany International's net margin of -4.93%. Albany International's return on equity of 9.44% beat TriMas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Albany International-4.93% 9.44% 4.26%
TriMas 93.79%8.38%4.53%

97.4% of Albany International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.4% of TriMas shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Albany International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of TriMas shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

TriMas has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Albany International. Albany International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TriMas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Albany International$1.18B1.83-$57.34M-$2.04N/A
TriMas$1.04B1.38$120.14M$24.071.67

Albany International has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TriMas has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Albany International pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. TriMas pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Albany International pays out -54.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TriMas pays out 0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Albany International has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Albany International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Albany International presently has a consensus price target of $62.33, suggesting a potential downside of 18.37%. TriMas has a consensus price target of $41.50, suggesting a potential upside of 3.18%. Given TriMas' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe TriMas is more favorable than Albany International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Albany International
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
TriMas
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Summary

TriMas beats Albany International on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TriMas News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TRS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TRS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TRS vs. The Competition

MetricTriMasMETAL PROC&FABR IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.45B$2.87B$9.44B$12.19B
Dividend Yield0.39%2.10%3.49%8.55%
P/E Ratio1.6723.7926.9723.75
Price / Sales1.3818.681,805.08109.45
Price / Cash11.5114.9027.1359.05
Price / Book2.323.284.416.06
Net Income$120.14M$91.72M$792.89M$336.44M
7 Day Performance0.60%2.08%0.16%-1.50%
1 Month Performance-9.66%2.83%0.35%-4.62%
1 Year Performance15.34%52.16%12.96%15.02%

TriMas Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TRS
TriMas
3.5985 of 5 stars
$40.22
-0.8%
$41.50
+3.2%
+27.8%$1.45B$1.04B1.673,700
MWA
Mueller Water Products
4.8112 of 5 stars
$24.80
-1.0%
$30.00
+21.0%
+3.9%$3.88B$1.43B18.933,500
SXI
Standex International
4.0401 of 5 stars
$302.53
+0.8%
$289.67
-4.3%
+77.2%$3.66B$790.11M36.784,100
KAI
Kadant
3.213 of 5 stars
$304.84
-0.5%
$341.50
+12.0%
-8.7%$3.60B$1.05B34.763,900
KMT
Kennametal
2.7649 of 5 stars
$33.60
-0.4%
$35.79
+6.5%
+40.5%$2.56B$2.14B18.978,124

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:TRS) was last updated on 7/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners