Is PRLB or HY more profitable?

Proto Labs has a net margin of 5.44% compared to Hyster-Yale's net margin of -3.33%. Proto Labs' return on equity of 4.80% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Proto Labs 5.44% 4.80% 4.22% Hyster-Yale -3.33% -21.03% -4.87%

Does the media refer more to PRLB or HY?

In the previous week, Proto Labs had 2 more articles in the media than Hyster-Yale. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Proto Labs and 7 mentions for Hyster-Yale. Proto Labs' average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Hyster-Yale's score of 0.04 indicating that Proto Labs is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Proto Labs 2 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Hyster-Yale 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor HLIO or HY?

In the previous week, Helios Technologies had 7 more articles in the media than Hyster-Yale. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Helios Technologies and 7 mentions for Hyster-Yale. Helios Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Hyster-Yale's score of 0.04 indicating that Helios Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Helios Technologies 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Hyster-Yale 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend GRC or HY?

Hyster-Yale has a consensus price target of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 51.90%. Given Hyster-Yale's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hyster-Yale is more favorable than Gorman-Rupp. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gorman-Rupp 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 Hyster-Yale 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25

Is GRC or HY more profitable?

Gorman-Rupp has a net margin of 8.88% compared to Hyster-Yale's net margin of -3.33%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 15.55% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Gorman-Rupp 8.88% 15.55% 7.59% Hyster-Yale -3.33% -21.03% -4.87%

Does the media prefer GRC or HY?

In the previous week, Hyster-Yale had 5 more articles in the media than Gorman-Rupp. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Hyster-Yale and 2 mentions for Gorman-Rupp. Hyster-Yale's average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Gorman-Rupp's score of 0.00 indicating that Hyster-Yale is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gorman-Rupp 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Hyster-Yale 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, ATS or HY?

ATS has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hyster-Yale. Hyster-Yale is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ATS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ATS $2.15B 0.82 $51.85M $0.34 53.79 Hyster-Yale $3.77B 0.15 -$60.10M -$6.56 N/A

Is ATS or HY more profitable?

ATS has a net margin of 1.60% compared to Hyster-Yale's net margin of -3.33%. ATS's return on equity of 8.96% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ATS 1.60% 8.96% 3.63% Hyster-Yale -3.33% -21.03% -4.87%

Does the media refer more to ATS or HY?

In the previous week, Hyster-Yale had 4 more articles in the media than ATS. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Hyster-Yale and 3 mentions for ATS. Hyster-Yale's average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat ATS's score of -0.06 indicating that Hyster-Yale is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ATS 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Hyster-Yale 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Hyster-Yale (HY) Competitors

$31.27 +0.85 (+2.79%)

Closing price 10/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$31.20 -0.07 (-0.24%)

As of 10/2/2026 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

HY vs. PRLB, HLIO, GRC, ATS, and EPAC

Should you buy Hyster-Yale stock or one of its competitors? Hyster-Yale's main competitors and comparable companies include Proto Labs (PRLB), Helios Technologies (HLIO), Gorman-Rupp (GRC), ATS (ATS), and Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does Hyster-Yale compare to Proto Labs?

Proto Labs (NYSE:PRLB) and Hyster-Yale (NYSE:HY) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Proto Labs has a net margin of 5.44% compared to Hyster-Yale's net margin of -3.33%. Proto Labs' return on equity of 4.80% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Proto Labs	5.44%	4.80%	4.22%
Hyster-Yale	-3.33%	-21.03%	-4.87%

Proto Labs has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hyster-Yale. Hyster-Yale is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Proto Labs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Proto Labs	$533.13M	4.41	$21.24M	$1.25	78.60
Hyster-Yale	$3.77B	0.15	-$60.10M	-$6.56	N/A

84.5% of Proto Labs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.5% of Hyster-Yale shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Proto Labs shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.8% of Hyster-Yale shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Proto Labs currently has a consensus price target of $89.00, indicating a potential downside of 9.41%. Hyster-Yale has a consensus price target of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 51.90%. Given Hyster-Yale's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hyster-Yale is more favorable than Proto Labs.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Proto Labs	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.25
Hyster-Yale	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Proto Labs has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hyster-Yale has a beta of 1.63, suggesting that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Proto Labs had 2 more articles in the media than Hyster-Yale. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Proto Labs and 7 mentions for Hyster-Yale. Proto Labs' average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Hyster-Yale's score of 0.04 indicating that Proto Labs is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Proto Labs	2 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Hyster-Yale	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Proto Labs beats Hyster-Yale on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hyster-Yale compare to Helios Technologies?

Helios Technologies (NYSE:HLIO) and Hyster-Yale (NYSE:HY) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Helios Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Hyster-Yale pays an annual dividend of $1.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Helios Technologies pays out 22.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hyster-Yale pays out -22.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hyster-Yale has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Hyster-Yale is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

94.7% of Helios Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.5% of Hyster-Yale shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Helios Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.8% of Hyster-Yale shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Helios Technologies has a net margin of 8.01% compared to Hyster-Yale's net margin of -3.33%. Helios Technologies' return on equity of 11.43% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Helios Technologies	8.01%	11.43%	7.00%
Hyster-Yale	-3.33%	-21.03%	-4.87%

In the previous week, Helios Technologies had 7 more articles in the media than Hyster-Yale. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Helios Technologies and 7 mentions for Hyster-Yale. Helios Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Hyster-Yale's score of 0.04 indicating that Helios Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Helios Technologies	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Hyster-Yale	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Helios Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hyster-Yale. Hyster-Yale is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helios Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Helios Technologies	$839M	2.82	$48.40M	$2.14	33.53
Hyster-Yale	$3.77B	0.15	-$60.10M	-$6.56	N/A

Helios Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $96.25, indicating a potential upside of 34.15%. Hyster-Yale has a consensus target price of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 51.90%. Given Hyster-Yale's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hyster-Yale is more favorable than Helios Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Helios Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.14
Hyster-Yale	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Helios Technologies has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hyster-Yale has a beta of 1.63, suggesting that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Helios Technologies beats Hyster-Yale on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hyster-Yale compare to Gorman-Rupp?

Gorman-Rupp (NYSE:GRC) and Hyster-Yale (NYSE:HY) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and earnings.

Gorman-Rupp pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Hyster-Yale pays an annual dividend of $1.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Gorman-Rupp pays out 32.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hyster-Yale pays out -22.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gorman-Rupp has increased its dividend for 52 consecutive years and Hyster-Yale has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Hyster-Yale is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hyster-Yale has a beta of 1.63, suggesting that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Hyster-Yale had 5 more articles in the media than Gorman-Rupp. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Hyster-Yale and 2 mentions for Gorman-Rupp. Hyster-Yale's average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Gorman-Rupp's score of 0.00 indicating that Hyster-Yale is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gorman-Rupp	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Hyster-Yale	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

59.3% of Gorman-Rupp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.5% of Hyster-Yale shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.6% of Gorman-Rupp shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 37.8% of Hyster-Yale shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gorman-Rupp has a net margin of 8.88% compared to Hyster-Yale's net margin of -3.33%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 15.55% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gorman-Rupp	8.88%	15.55%	7.59%
Hyster-Yale	-3.33%	-21.03%	-4.87%

Hyster-Yale has a consensus price target of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 51.90%. Given Hyster-Yale's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hyster-Yale is more favorable than Gorman-Rupp.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gorman-Rupp	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Hyster-Yale	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Gorman-Rupp has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hyster-Yale. Hyster-Yale is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gorman-Rupp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gorman-Rupp	$682.39M	2.99	$53.02M	$2.37	32.62
Hyster-Yale	$3.77B	0.15	-$60.10M	-$6.56	N/A

Summary

Gorman-Rupp beats Hyster-Yale on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hyster-Yale compare to ATS?

ATS (NYSE:ATS) and Hyster-Yale (NYSE:HY) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and earnings.

ATS currently has a consensus target price of $42.50, indicating a potential upside of 132.37%. Hyster-Yale has a consensus target price of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 51.90%. Given ATS's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe ATS is more favorable than Hyster-Yale.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ATS	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.14
Hyster-Yale	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

ATS has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hyster-Yale has a beta of 1.63, suggesting that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

ATS has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hyster-Yale. Hyster-Yale is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ATS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ATS	$2.15B	0.82	$51.85M	$0.34	53.79
Hyster-Yale	$3.77B	0.15	-$60.10M	-$6.56	N/A

ATS has a net margin of 1.60% compared to Hyster-Yale's net margin of -3.33%. ATS's return on equity of 8.96% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ATS	1.60%	8.96%	3.63%
Hyster-Yale	-3.33%	-21.03%	-4.87%

75.8% of ATS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.5% of Hyster-Yale shares are owned by institutional investors. 37.8% of Hyster-Yale shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Hyster-Yale had 4 more articles in the media than ATS. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Hyster-Yale and 3 mentions for ATS. Hyster-Yale's average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat ATS's score of -0.06 indicating that Hyster-Yale is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ATS	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Hyster-Yale	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

ATS beats Hyster-Yale on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hyster-Yale compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Enerpac Tool Group (NYSE:EPAC) and Hyster-Yale (NYSE:HY) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Enerpac Tool Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Hyster-Yale pays an annual dividend of $1.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Enerpac Tool Group pays out 2.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hyster-Yale pays out -22.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hyster-Yale has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Hyster-Yale is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Hyster-Yale had 7 more articles in the media than Enerpac Tool Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Hyster-Yale and 0 mentions for Enerpac Tool Group. Hyster-Yale's average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Enerpac Tool Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Hyster-Yale is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Enerpac Tool Group	Neutral
Hyster-Yale	Neutral

97.7% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.5% of Hyster-Yale shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.8% of Hyster-Yale shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Enerpac Tool Group has a net margin of 14.72% compared to Hyster-Yale's net margin of -3.33%. Enerpac Tool Group's return on equity of 23.21% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enerpac Tool Group	14.72%	23.21%	12.10%
Hyster-Yale	-3.33%	-21.03%	-4.87%

Enerpac Tool Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hyster-Yale. Hyster-Yale is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enerpac Tool Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enerpac Tool Group	$616.90M	2.95	$92.75M	$1.77	20.14
Hyster-Yale	$3.77B	0.15	-$60.10M	-$6.56	N/A

Enerpac Tool Group currently has a consensus price target of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 40.29%. Hyster-Yale has a consensus price target of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 51.90%. Given Hyster-Yale's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hyster-Yale is more favorable than Enerpac Tool Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enerpac Tool Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Hyster-Yale	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Enerpac Tool Group has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hyster-Yale has a beta of 1.63, meaning that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Hyster-Yale beats Enerpac Tool Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hyster-Yale News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HY and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HY vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Hyster-Yale	Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$545.44M	$11.20B	$10.14B	$22.65B
Dividend Yield	4.80%	2.33%	96.96%	3.72%
P/E Ratio	-4.77	21.36	25.43	27.75
Price / Sales	0.15	62.39	273.11	20.68
Price / Cash	34.80	23.08	23.97	38.88
Price / Book	1.16	4.30	4.80	4.64
Net Income	-$60.10M	$380.78M	$616.94M	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	0.44%	-0.45%	-0.93%	-1.06%
1 Month Performance	-8.27%	-2.32%	-2.36%	-5.50%
1 Year Performance	-14.95%	5.94%	2.50%	5.13%

Hyster-Yale Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HY Hyster-Yale	2.7086 of 5 stars	$31.27 +2.8%	$47.50 +51.9%	-14.7%	$545.44M	$3.77B	N/A	7,500	News Coverage Gap Up
PRLB Proto Labs	2.3609 of 5 stars	$96.41 -0.5%	$89.00 -7.7%	+96.6%	$2.31B	$533.13M	77.12	2,280	News Coverage
HLIO Helios Technologies	4.4112 of 5 stars	$68.41 -0.3%	$96.25 +40.7%	+37.1%	$2.25B	$839M	31.85	2,300	Dividend Announcement Analyst Upgrade
GRC Gorman-Rupp	2.6675 of 5 stars	$75.26 -1.1%	N/A	+63.9%	$1.99B	$682.39M	31.77	1,415
ATS ATS	2.5865 of 5 stars	$18.89 +0.4%	$42.50 +125.0%	-30.5%	$1.85B	$2.15B	55.56	7,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:HY) was last updated on 10/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Hyster-Yale (HY) Competitors

HY vs. PRLB, HLIO, GRC, ATS, and EPAC

How does Hyster-Yale compare to Proto Labs?

Summary

How does Hyster-Yale compare to Helios Technologies?

Summary

How does Hyster-Yale compare to Gorman-Rupp?

Summary

How does Hyster-Yale compare to ATS?

Summary

How does Hyster-Yale compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HY vs. The Competition

Hyster-Yale Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Hyster-Yale (HY) Competitors

HY vs. PRLB, HLIO, GRC, ATS, and EPAC

How does Hyster-Yale compare to Proto Labs?

Is PRLB or HY more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PRLB or HY?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PRLB or HY?

Do analysts prefer PRLB or HY?

Which has more volatility and risk, PRLB or HY?

Does the media refer more to PRLB or HY?

Summary

How does Hyster-Yale compare to Helios Technologies?

Is HLIO or HY a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of HLIO or HY?

Is HLIO or HY more profitable?

Does the media favor HLIO or HY?

Which has better valuation and earnings, HLIO or HY?

Do analysts prefer HLIO or HY?

Which has more volatility and risk, HLIO or HY?

Summary

How does Hyster-Yale compare to Gorman-Rupp?

Is GRC or HY a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, GRC or HY?

Does the media prefer GRC or HY?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of GRC or HY?

Is GRC or HY more profitable?

Do analysts recommend GRC or HY?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, GRC or HY?

Summary

How does Hyster-Yale compare to ATS?

Do analysts recommend ATS or HY?

Which has more volatility and risk, ATS or HY?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, ATS or HY?

Is ATS or HY more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in ATS or HY?

Does the media refer more to ATS or HY?

Summary

How does Hyster-Yale compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Is EPAC or HY a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor EPAC or HY?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in EPAC or HY?

Is EPAC or HY more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, EPAC or HY?

Do analysts recommend EPAC or HY?

Which has more volatility and risk, EPAC or HY?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HY vs. The Competition

Hyster-Yale Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools