Tennant (TNC) Competitors

93.3% of Tennant shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of ESAB shares are held by institutional investors. 3.5% of Tennant shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of ESAB shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ESAB had 2 more articles in the media than Tennant. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for ESAB and 4 mentions for Tennant. Tennant's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat ESAB's score of 0.47 indicating that Tennant is being referred to more favorably in the media.

ESAB has higher revenue and earnings than Tennant. ESAB is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tennant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

ESAB has a net margin of 5.75% compared to Tennant's net margin of 1.50%. ESAB's return on equity of 14.48% beat Tennant's return on equity.

Tennant pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. ESAB pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Tennant pays out 121.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. ESAB pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tennant has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years and ESAB has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Tennant is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Tennant has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ESAB has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Tennant presently has a consensus target price of $91.00, suggesting a potential upside of 31.97%. ESAB has a consensus target price of $138.14, suggesting a potential upside of 104.85%. Given ESAB's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe ESAB is more favorable than Tennant.

In the previous week, Tennant had 3 more articles in the media than Alliance Laundry. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Tennant and 1 mentions for Alliance Laundry. Tennant's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Alliance Laundry's score of 0.91 indicating that Tennant is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Alliance Laundry has higher revenue and earnings than Tennant. Alliance Laundry is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tennant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

93.3% of Tennant shares are held by institutional investors. 3.5% of Tennant shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.6% of Alliance Laundry shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alliance Laundry has a net margin of 10.08% compared to Tennant's net margin of 1.50%. Alliance Laundry's return on equity of 81.92% beat Tennant's return on equity.

Tennant currently has a consensus target price of $91.00, indicating a potential upside of 31.97%. Alliance Laundry has a consensus target price of $31.20, indicating a potential upside of 46.78%. Given Alliance Laundry's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Alliance Laundry is more favorable than Tennant.

In the previous week, Franklin Electric had 6 more articles in the media than Tennant. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Franklin Electric and 4 mentions for Tennant. Tennant's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Franklin Electric's score of 0.75 indicating that Tennant is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Tennant has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Franklin Electric has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

93.3% of Tennant shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.0% of Franklin Electric shares are held by institutional investors. 3.5% of Tennant shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Franklin Electric shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tennant presently has a consensus price target of $91.00, indicating a potential upside of 31.97%. Franklin Electric has a consensus price target of $114.50, indicating a potential upside of 19.16%. Given Tennant's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Tennant is more favorable than Franklin Electric.

Franklin Electric has higher revenue and earnings than Tennant. Franklin Electric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tennant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Tennant pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Franklin Electric pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Tennant pays out 121.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Franklin Electric pays out 32.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tennant has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years and Franklin Electric has increased its dividend for 33 consecutive years. Tennant is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Franklin Electric has a net margin of 7.06% compared to Tennant's net margin of 1.50%. Franklin Electric's return on equity of 15.18% beat Tennant's return on equity.

Tennant has a net margin of 1.50% compared to CECO Environmental's net margin of -3.39%. Tennant's return on equity of 13.32% beat CECO Environmental's return on equity.

In the previous week, CECO Environmental had 9 more articles in the media than Tennant. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for CECO Environmental and 4 mentions for Tennant. CECO Environmental's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Tennant's score of 1.02 indicating that CECO Environmental is being referred to more favorably in the media.

CECO Environmental presently has a consensus price target of $104.88, indicating a potential upside of 48.40%. Tennant has a consensus price target of $91.00, indicating a potential upside of 31.97%. Given CECO Environmental's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CECO Environmental is more favorable than Tennant.

CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.51, indicating that its share price is 51% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tennant has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

CECO Environmental has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tennant. CECO Environmental is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tennant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

68.1% of CECO Environmental shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of Tennant shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of CECO Environmental shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.5% of Tennant shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.