S&P 500   3,870.29
DOW   31,391.52
QQQ   318.40
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,870.29
DOW   31,391.52
QQQ   318.40
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,870.29
DOW   31,391.52
QQQ   318.40
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,870.29
DOW   31,391.52
QQQ   318.40
pixel
pixel
Log in
NASDAQ:ERII

Energy Recovery Competitors

$16.74
-1.53 (-8.37 %)
(As of 03/2/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$16.70
Now: $16.74
$18.60
50-Day Range
$13.58
MA: $14.97
$18.27
52-Week Range
$6.11
Now: $16.74
$18.60
Volume669,864 shs
Average Volume345,502 shs
Market Capitalization$939.11 million
P/E Ratio41.85
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.36

Competitors

Energy Recovery (NASDAQ:ERII) Vs. ITW, PH, SWK, IR, XYL, and DOV

Should you be buying ERII stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "industrial machinery" are considered alternatives and competitors to Energy Recovery, including Illinois Tool Works (ITW), Parker-Hannifin (PH), Stanley Black & Decker (SWK), Ingersoll Rand (IR), Xylem (XYL), and Dover (DOV).

Illinois Tool Works (NYSE:ITW) and Energy Recovery (NASDAQ:ERII) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Risk & Volatility

Illinois Tool Works has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Illinois Tool Works and Energy Recovery's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Illinois Tool Works$14.11 billion4.63$2.52 billion$7.7526.65
Energy Recovery$86.94 million10.80$10.91 million$0.1893.00

Illinois Tool Works has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Recovery. Illinois Tool Works is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Recovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

77.4% of Illinois Tool Works shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.1% of Energy Recovery shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Illinois Tool Works shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.4% of Energy Recovery shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Illinois Tool Works and Energy Recovery's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Illinois Tool Works16.77%80.95%14.37%
Energy Recovery20.61%16.23%12.72%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Illinois Tool Works and Energy Recovery, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Illinois Tool Works111402.19
Energy Recovery01202.67

Illinois Tool Works currently has a consensus target price of $204.6875, indicating a potential downside of 0.88%. Energy Recovery has a consensus target price of $12.75, indicating a potential downside of 23.84%. Given Illinois Tool Works' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Illinois Tool Works is more favorable than Energy Recovery.

Summary

Illinois Tool Works beats Energy Recovery on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) and Energy Recovery (NASDAQ:ERII) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Volatility & Risk

Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.74, suggesting that its share price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Parker-Hannifin and Energy Recovery's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Parker-Hannifin$13.70 billion2.79$1.21 billion$10.7927.43
Energy Recovery$86.94 million10.80$10.91 million$0.1893.00

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Recovery. Parker-Hannifin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Recovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

77.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.1% of Energy Recovery shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.4% of Energy Recovery shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Parker-Hannifin and Energy Recovery's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Parker-Hannifin8.75%22.77%7.13%
Energy Recovery20.61%16.23%12.72%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Parker-Hannifin and Energy Recovery, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Parker-Hannifin001403.00
Energy Recovery01202.67

Parker-Hannifin currently has a consensus target price of $283.5385, indicating a potential downside of 4.20%. Energy Recovery has a consensus target price of $12.75, indicating a potential downside of 23.84%. Given Parker-Hannifin's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Parker-Hannifin is more favorable than Energy Recovery.

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Energy Recovery on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) and Energy Recovery (NASDAQ:ERII) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Volatility & Risk

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Stanley Black & Decker and Energy Recovery's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Stanley Black & Decker$14.44 billion2.07$955.80 million$8.4022.08
Energy Recovery$86.94 million10.80$10.91 million$0.1893.00

Stanley Black & Decker has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Recovery. Stanley Black & Decker is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Recovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

85.4% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.1% of Energy Recovery shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.4% of Energy Recovery shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Stanley Black & Decker and Energy Recovery's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Stanley Black & Decker6.98%15.05%5.46%
Energy Recovery20.61%16.23%12.72%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Stanley Black & Decker and Energy Recovery, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Stanley Black & Decker13902.62
Energy Recovery01202.67

Stanley Black & Decker currently has a consensus target price of $184.6154, indicating a potential downside of 0.46%. Energy Recovery has a consensus target price of $12.75, indicating a potential downside of 23.84%. Given Stanley Black & Decker's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Stanley Black & Decker is more favorable than Energy Recovery.

Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) and Energy Recovery (NASDAQ:ERII) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Volatility & Risk

Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.53, suggesting that its share price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Ingersoll Rand and Energy Recovery's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ingersoll Rand-3.97%-2.27%-1.25%
Energy Recovery20.61%16.23%12.72%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Ingersoll Rand and Energy Recovery's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ingersoll Rand$2.45 billion7.97$159.10 million$0.7661.58
Energy Recovery$86.94 million10.80$10.91 million$0.1893.00

Ingersoll Rand has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Recovery. Ingersoll Rand is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Recovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

95.9% of Ingersoll Rand shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.1% of Energy Recovery shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Ingersoll Rand shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.4% of Energy Recovery shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Ingersoll Rand and Energy Recovery, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ingersoll Rand06802.57
Energy Recovery01202.67

Ingersoll Rand currently has a consensus target price of $45.3846, indicating a potential downside of 3.02%. Energy Recovery has a consensus target price of $12.75, indicating a potential downside of 23.84%. Given Ingersoll Rand's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ingersoll Rand is more favorable than Energy Recovery.

Energy Recovery (NASDAQ:ERII) and Xylem (NYSE:XYL) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

Volatility and Risk

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Xylem has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Energy Recovery and Xylem's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Energy Recovery20.61%16.23%12.72%
Xylem5.09%14.72%5.44%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Energy Recovery and Xylem's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energy Recovery$86.94 million10.80$10.91 million$0.1893.00
Xylem$5.25 billion3.50$401 million$3.0233.76

Xylem has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Recovery. Xylem is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Recovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

40.1% of Energy Recovery shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.9% of Xylem shares are held by institutional investors. 17.4% of Energy Recovery shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Xylem shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Energy Recovery and Xylem, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Energy Recovery01202.67
Xylem311201.94

Energy Recovery presently has a consensus price target of $12.75, indicating a potential downside of 23.84%. Xylem has a consensus price target of $78.4167, indicating a potential downside of 23.09%. Given Xylem's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Xylem is more favorable than Energy Recovery.

Summary

Energy Recovery beats Xylem on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Energy Recovery (NASDAQ:ERII) and Dover (NYSE:DOV) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

Volatility and Risk

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dover has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Energy Recovery and Dover's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Energy Recovery20.61%16.23%12.72%
Dover10.02%26.73%9.24%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Energy Recovery and Dover's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energy Recovery$86.94 million10.80$10.91 million$0.1893.00
Dover$7.14 billion2.56$677.92 million$5.9321.44

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Recovery. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Recovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

40.1% of Energy Recovery shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of Dover shares are held by institutional investors. 17.4% of Energy Recovery shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Dover shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Energy Recovery and Dover, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Energy Recovery01202.67
Dover05602.55

Energy Recovery presently has a consensus price target of $12.75, indicating a potential downside of 23.84%. Dover has a consensus price target of $120.60, indicating a potential downside of 5.15%. Given Dover's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Dover is more favorable than Energy Recovery.


Energy Recovery Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Illinois Tool Works logo
ITW
Illinois Tool Works
2.7$206.50-0.0%$65.39 billion$14.11 billion31.29
Parker-Hannifin logo
PH
Parker-Hannifin
2.3$295.97-0.5%$38.20 billion$13.70 billion32.38Increase in Short Interest
Stanley Black & Decker logo
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker
2.6$185.47-2.6%$29.84 billion$14.44 billion30.11
Ingersoll Rand logo
IR
Ingersoll Rand
1.4$46.80-1.4%$19.55 billion$2.45 billion-126.48Analyst Report
Xylem logo
XYL
Xylem
1.9$101.96-0.3%$18.38 billion$5.25 billion73.35Increase in Short Interest
Dover logo
DOV
Dover
2.4$127.15-0.2%$18.26 billion$7.14 billion27.64Unusual Options Activity
IDEX logo
IEX
IDEX
1.7$199.77-0.1%$15.12 billion$2.49 billion40.85Increase in Short Interest
Graco logo
GGG
Graco
1.8$69.93-1.5%$11.80 billion$1.65 billion40.19
Snap-on logo
SNA
Snap-on
2.3$209.91-0.6%$11.38 billion$3.73 billion19.62Decrease in Short Interest
Nordson logo
NDSN
Nordson
2.0$192.96-0.4%$11.21 billion$2.12 billion45.19Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Pentair logo
PNR
Pentair
2.2$57.70-1.0%$9.58 billion$2.96 billion27.48
The Middleby logo
MIDD
The Middleby
1.2$161.87-1.6%$9.00 billion$2.96 billion33.86Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Donaldson logo
DCI
Donaldson
2.0$59.23-1.5%$7.48 billion$2.58 billion29.91Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Analyst Revision
Woodward logo
WWD
Woodward
1.6$117.21-1.7%$7.39 billion$2.90 billion30.21
ITT logo
ITT
ITT
1.6$84.81-1.8%$7.34 billion$2.85 billion48.74Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Lincoln Electric logo
LECO
Lincoln Electric
2.0$119.48-0.7%$7.13 billion$3.00 billion35.56
The Timken logo
TKR
The Timken
2.4$79.17-2.9%$5.99 billion$3.79 billion17.52Increase in Short Interest
Rexnord logo
RXN
Rexnord
1.8$46.23-0.6%$5.56 billion$2.07 billion36.12
Chart Industries logo
GTLS
Chart Industries
1.4$149.15-1.3%$5.38 billion$1.30 billion85.23Analyst Report
Colfax logo
CFX
Colfax
1.4$44.62-2.1%$5.29 billion$3.33 billion-892.40
Valmont Industries logo
VMI
Valmont Industries
1.8$240.85-1.6%$5.11 billion$2.77 billion36.77Insider Selling
Increase in Short Interest
Crane logo
CR
Crane
1.9$87.67-1.3%$5.10 billion$3.28 billion230.72
RBC Bearings logo
ROLL
RBC Bearings
1.2$197.38-2.7%$4.96 billion$727.46 million45.90
Flowserve logo
FLS
Flowserve
1.7$37.82-0.8%$4.93 billion$3.94 billion38.20Analyst Revision
John Bean Technologies logo
JBT
John Bean Technologies
1.5$145.22-3.7%$4.61 billion$1.95 billion38.62Dividend Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Proto Labs logo
PRLB
Proto Labs
0.7$145.77-3.5%$4.02 billion$458.73 million69.41
Altra Industrial Motion logo
AIMC
Altra Industrial Motion
1.4$60.84-1.0%$3.94 billion$1.83 billion-202.79
Watts Water Technologies logo
WTS
Watts Water Technologies
1.7$116.05-0.2%$3.90 billion$1.60 billion34.13Insider Selling
Kennametal logo
KMT
Kennametal
1.5$38.71-3.7%$3.23 billion$1.89 billion-94.41
ESCO Technologies logo
ESE
ESCO Technologies
1.6$105.97-2.3%$2.76 billion$732.91 million27.10News Coverage
Albany International logo
AIN
Albany International
1.6$83.92-0.1%$2.71 billion$1.05 billion27.16
SPX FLOW logo
FLOW
SPX FLOW
1.3$64.10-0.0%$2.70 billion$1.51 billion-16.78Analyst Upgrade
Barnes Group logo
B
Barnes Group
2.1$52.11-2.6%$2.64 billion$1.49 billion30.83Decrease in Short Interest
Mueller Industries logo
MLI
Mueller Industries
2.5$41.26-2.6%$2.36 billion$2.43 billion17.71
Mueller Water Products logo
MWA
Mueller Water Products
2.2$13.04-1.6%$2.07 billion$964.10 million28.98Insider Selling
Kadant logo
KAI
Kadant
1.8$176.66-2.3%$2.03 billion$704.64 million42.77
EnPro Industries logo
NPO
EnPro Industries
2.1$84.30-0.6%$1.73 billion$1.21 billion8.91
Omega Flex logo
OFLX
Omega Flex
0.7$157.95-8.6%$1.59 billion$111.36 million87.27Gap Up
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling logo
HY
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling
1.1$88.73-0.0%$1.49 billion$3.29 billion54.77Earnings Announcement
Tennant logo
TNC
Tennant
1.9$77.40-1.1%$1.43 billion$1.14 billion34.10Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
TriMas logo
TRS
TriMas
1.1$31.91-5.7%$1.38 billion$723.53 million-20.86Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
Harsco logo
HSC
Harsco
1.7$17.02-9.2%$1.34 billion$1.50 billion70.92Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
Standex International logo
SXI
Standex International
2.0$102.84-1.0%$1.27 billion$604.53 million72.42Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Columbus McKinnon logo
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon
1.8$51.93-0.6%$1.24 billion$809.16 million71.14Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Piedmont Lithium logo
PLL
Piedmont Lithium
0.7$80.78-8.7%$1.13 billionN/A-118.79Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
DMC Global logo
BOOM
DMC Global
1.1$63.15-2.0%$971.82 million$397.55 million-161.92Insider Selling
Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
The Gorman-Rupp logo
GRC
The Gorman-Rupp
1.9$32.27-1.8%$842.31 million$398.18 million31.33
CIRCOR International logo
CIR
CIRCOR International
1.5$39.14-0.6%$782.72 million$964.31 million-4.61Upcoming Earnings
The ExOne logo
XONE
The ExOne
1.0$38.02-11.4%$729.49 million$53.28 million-43.20Unusual Options Activity
Gap Up
Lydall logo
LDL
Lydall
1.1$38.86-1.4%$694.04 million$837.40 million-4.67Earnings Announcement
Gap Down
This page was last updated on 3/3/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.