DMC Global Competitors

DMC Global (NASDAQ:BOOM) and Illinois Tool Works (NYSE:ITW) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares DMC Global and Illinois Tool Works' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Illinois Tool Works has higher revenue and earnings than DMC Global. DMC Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Illinois Tool Works, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares DMC Global and Illinois Tool Works' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

DMC Global has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Illinois Tool Works has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for DMC Global and Illinois Tool Works, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

DMC Global presently has a consensus price target of $49.6667, indicating a potential downside of 12.83%. Illinois Tool Works has a consensus price target of $210.1250, indicating a potential downside of 5.19%. Given Illinois Tool Works' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Illinois Tool Works is more favorable than DMC Global.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

77.4% of Illinois Tool Works shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of DMC Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Illinois Tool Works shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Illinois Tool Works beats DMC Global on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) and DMC Global (NASDAQ:BOOM) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

77.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of DMC Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Parker-Hannifin and DMC Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Parker-Hannifin presently has a consensus target price of $310.6429, indicating a potential downside of 2.21%. DMC Global has a consensus target price of $49.6667, indicating a potential downside of 12.83%. Given Parker-Hannifin's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Parker-Hannifin is more favorable than DMC Global.

Risk and Volatility

Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.74, meaning that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, DMC Global has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Parker-Hannifin and DMC Global's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than DMC Global. DMC Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Parker-Hannifin and DMC Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats DMC Global on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) and DMC Global (NASDAQ:BOOM) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

85.4% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of DMC Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Stanley Black & Decker and DMC Global's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Stanley Black & Decker has higher revenue and earnings than DMC Global. DMC Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stanley Black & Decker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Stanley Black & Decker and DMC Global, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Stanley Black & Decker presently has a consensus price target of $191.1538, suggesting a potential downside of 5.10%. DMC Global has a consensus price target of $49.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 12.83%. Given Stanley Black & Decker's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Stanley Black & Decker is more favorable than DMC Global.

Profitability

This table compares Stanley Black & Decker and DMC Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.47, indicating that its share price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, DMC Global has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Stanley Black & Decker beats DMC Global on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) and DMC Global (NASDAQ:BOOM) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and earnings.

Volatility and Risk

Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.53, suggesting that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, DMC Global has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ingersoll Rand and DMC Global's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Ingersoll Rand has higher revenue and earnings than DMC Global. DMC Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingersoll Rand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Ingersoll Rand and DMC Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Ingersoll Rand and DMC Global, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Ingersoll Rand presently has a consensus target price of $47.3846, indicating a potential downside of 4.08%. DMC Global has a consensus target price of $49.6667, indicating a potential downside of 12.83%. Given Ingersoll Rand's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Ingersoll Rand is more favorable than DMC Global.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

95.9% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of DMC Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ingersoll Rand beats DMC Global on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dover (NYSE:DOV) and DMC Global (NASDAQ:BOOM) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Dover and DMC Global's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than DMC Global. DMC Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dover, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Dover and DMC Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Dover and DMC Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Dover presently has a consensus target price of $132.25, indicating a potential downside of 4.37%. DMC Global has a consensus target price of $49.6667, indicating a potential downside of 12.83%. Given Dover's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Dover is more favorable than DMC Global.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

82.7% of Dover shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Dover shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of DMC Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Dover has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, DMC Global has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Dover beats DMC Global on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Xylem (NYSE:XYL) and DMC Global (NASDAQ:BOOM) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Xylem and DMC Global's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Xylem has higher revenue and earnings than DMC Global. DMC Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xylem, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Xylem and DMC Global, as reported by MarketBeat.

Xylem presently has a consensus target price of $84.5455, suggesting a potential downside of 21.57%. DMC Global has a consensus target price of $49.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 12.83%. Given DMC Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe DMC Global is more favorable than Xylem.

Volatility and Risk

Xylem has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, DMC Global has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

84.9% of Xylem shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Xylem shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of DMC Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Xylem and DMC Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Xylem beats DMC Global on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.