Free Trial

DMC Global (BOOM) Competitors

DMC Global logo
$6.93 -0.44 (-5.97%)
Closing price 05/15/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$6.93 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 05/15/2026 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BOOM vs. ERII, CMCO, FSTR, OFLX, and AP

Should you buy DMC Global stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares DMC Global with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with DMC Global include Energy Recovery (ERII), Columbus McKinnon (CMCO), L.B. Foster (FSTR), Omega Flex (OFLX), and Ampco-Pittsburgh (AP). These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery" industry.

How does DMC Global compare to Energy Recovery?

DMC Global (NASDAQ:BOOM) and Energy Recovery (NASDAQ:ERII) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Energy Recovery has a net margin of 15.07% compared to DMC Global's net margin of -4.28%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 10.89% beat DMC Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DMC Global-4.28% -6.02% -2.30%
Energy Recovery 15.07%10.89%9.55%

In the previous week, Energy Recovery had 6 more articles in the media than DMC Global. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Energy Recovery and 3 mentions for DMC Global. DMC Global's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Energy Recovery's score of 0.66 indicating that DMC Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
DMC Global
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Energy Recovery
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Energy Recovery has lower revenue, but higher earnings than DMC Global. DMC Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Recovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DMC Global$586.15M0.24-$13.45M-$1.27N/A
Energy Recovery$134.99M3.21$22.96M$0.3822.13

77.6% of DMC Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.6% of Energy Recovery shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.1% of DMC Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Energy Recovery shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

DMC Global has a beta of 1.71, meaning that its stock price is 71% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

DMC Global currently has a consensus target price of $8.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.66%. Energy Recovery has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 78.36%. Given Energy Recovery's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Energy Recovery is more favorable than DMC Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DMC Global
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Energy Recovery
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Energy Recovery beats DMC Global on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does DMC Global compare to Columbus McKinnon?

DMC Global (NASDAQ:BOOM) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

Columbus McKinnon has a net margin of 0.60% compared to DMC Global's net margin of -4.28%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 7.41% beat DMC Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DMC Global-4.28% -6.02% -2.30%
Columbus McKinnon 0.60%7.41%3.82%

In the previous week, DMC Global and DMC Global both had 3 articles in the media. DMC Global's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.56 indicating that DMC Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
DMC Global
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Columbus McKinnon
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Columbus McKinnon has higher revenue and earnings than DMC Global. DMC Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DMC Global$586.15M0.24-$13.45M-$1.27N/A
Columbus McKinnon$963.03M0.43-$5.14M$0.2168.00

77.6% of DMC Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. 7.1% of DMC Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

DMC Global has a beta of 1.71, suggesting that its stock price is 71% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

DMC Global presently has a consensus target price of $8.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.66%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 64.57%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than DMC Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DMC Global
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

DMC Global pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. DMC Global pays out -39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out 133.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. DMC Global is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Columbus McKinnon beats DMC Global on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does DMC Global compare to L.B. Foster?

L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) and DMC Global (NASDAQ:BOOM) are both small-cap industrial machinery companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.6% of DMC Global shares are held by institutional investors. 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of DMC Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

L.B. Foster presently has a consensus target price of $32.00, suggesting a potential downside of 17.50%. DMC Global has a consensus target price of $8.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.66%. Given DMC Global's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe DMC Global is more favorable than L.B. Foster.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
L.B. Foster
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
DMC Global
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

L.B. Foster has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DMC Global. DMC Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
L.B. Foster$540.01M0.75$7.55M$1.0337.66
DMC Global$586.15M0.24-$13.45M-$1.27N/A

L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DMC Global has a beta of 1.71, meaning that its share price is 71% more volatile than the broader market.

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 1.98% compared to DMC Global's net margin of -4.28%. L.B. Foster's return on equity of 6.36% beat DMC Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
L.B. Foster1.98% 6.36% 3.31%
DMC Global -4.28%-6.02%-2.30%

In the previous week, L.B. Foster had 2 more articles in the media than DMC Global. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for L.B. Foster and 3 mentions for DMC Global. DMC Global's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat L.B. Foster's score of 0.85 indicating that DMC Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
L.B. Foster
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
DMC Global
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

L.B. Foster beats DMC Global on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does DMC Global compare to Omega Flex?

Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) and DMC Global (NASDAQ:BOOM) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, DMC Global had 2 more articles in the media than Omega Flex. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for DMC Global and 1 mentions for Omega Flex. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat DMC Global's score of 1.04 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Omega Flex Very Positive
DMC Global Positive

Omega Flex has a net margin of 13.60% compared to DMC Global's net margin of -4.28%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat DMC Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Omega Flex13.60% 15.94% 12.92%
DMC Global -4.28%-6.02%-2.30%

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DMC Global has a beta of 1.71, indicating that its stock price is 71% more volatile than the broader market.

36.1% of Omega Flex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.6% of DMC Global shares are held by institutional investors. 65.2% of Omega Flex shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of DMC Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Omega Flex has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DMC Global. DMC Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Omega Flex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Omega Flex$98.30M2.78$14.83M$1.3320.38
DMC Global$586.15M0.24-$13.45M-$1.27N/A

DMC Global has a consensus target price of $8.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.66%. Given DMC Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe DMC Global is more favorable than Omega Flex.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Omega Flex
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
DMC Global
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Omega Flex pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. DMC Global pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Omega Flex pays out 102.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. DMC Global pays out -39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Omega Flex has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. DMC Global is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Omega Flex beats DMC Global on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does DMC Global compare to Ampco-Pittsburgh?

DMC Global (NASDAQ:BOOM) and Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

DMC Global has higher revenue and earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. DMC Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ampco-Pittsburgh, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DMC Global$586.15M0.24-$13.45M-$1.27N/A
Ampco-Pittsburgh$434.17M0.50-$66.07M-$3.36N/A

In the previous week, Ampco-Pittsburgh had 5 more articles in the media than DMC Global. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Ampco-Pittsburgh and 3 mentions for DMC Global. DMC Global's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's score of 0.19 indicating that DMC Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
DMC Global
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ampco-Pittsburgh
0 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

DMC Global currently has a consensus price target of $8.50, indicating a potential upside of 22.66%. Given DMC Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe DMC Global is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DMC Global
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Ampco-Pittsburgh
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

77.6% of DMC Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by institutional investors. 7.1% of DMC Global shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

DMC Global has a net margin of -4.28% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -15.53%. DMC Global's return on equity of -6.02% beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DMC Global-4.28% -6.02% -2.30%
Ampco-Pittsburgh -15.53%-7.56%-0.91%

DMC Global has a beta of 1.71, indicating that its share price is 71% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

DMC Global beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get DMC Global News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BOOM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BOOM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BOOM vs. The Competition

MetricDMC GlobalIndustrial Services IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$141.85M$21.34B$9.24B$12.30B
Dividend YieldN/A6.88%3.58%5.26%
P/E Ratio-5.4622.2225.1525.27
Price / Sales0.242.124,996.2162.09
Price / Cash5.1013.5027.7654.86
Price / Book0.593.494.796.90
Net Income-$13.45M$712.80M$793.75M$334.66M
7 Day Performance-6.85%-1.58%-0.77%0.12%
1 Month Performance33.78%0.55%1.28%-0.18%
1 Year PerformanceN/A4.95%36.16%30.62%

DMC Global Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BOOM
DMC Global
3.5849 of 5 stars
$6.93
-6.0%
$8.50
+22.7%
+0.0%$141.85M$586.15MN/A1,500
ERII
Energy Recovery
4.806 of 5 stars
$8.70
-4.7%
$15.00
+72.4%
-36.1%$470.61M$134.99M22.90250
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon
2.6058 of 5 stars
$15.72
-1.3%
$23.50
+49.5%
-19.9%$457.82M$963.03M74.863,478
FSTR
L.B. Foster
2.3777 of 5 stars
$40.92
-3.3%
$32.00
-21.8%
+99.9%$442.40M$540.01M39.731,191
OFLX
Omega Flex
2.8793 of 5 stars
$28.83
-4.2%
N/A-22.5%$303.84M$98.30M21.68170

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:BOOM) was last updated on 5/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners