DMC Global (BOOM) Competitors

DMC Global logo
$6.05 +0.02 (+0.33%)
Closing price 06/26/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$6.07 +0.02 (+0.40%)
As of 06/26/2026 07:58 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BOOM vs. ERII, FSTR, CMCO, OFLX, and AP

Should you buy DMC Global stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares DMC Global with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with DMC Global include Energy Recovery (ERII), L.B. Foster (FSTR), Columbus McKinnon (CMCO), Omega Flex (OFLX), and Ampco-Pittsburgh (AP). These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery" industry.

How does DMC Global compare to Energy Recovery?

DMC Global (NASDAQ:BOOM) and Energy Recovery (NASDAQ:ERII) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

DMC Global presently has a consensus target price of $8.50, indicating a potential upside of 40.50%. Energy Recovery has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 70.07%. Given Energy Recovery's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Energy Recovery is more favorable than DMC Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DMC Global
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Energy Recovery
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

DMC Global has a beta of 1.73, indicating that its share price is 73% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Recovery has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

77.6% of DMC Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.6% of Energy Recovery shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.1% of DMC Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Energy Recovery shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Energy Recovery has lower revenue, but higher earnings than DMC Global. DMC Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Recovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DMC Global$586.15M0.21-$13.45M-$1.27N/A
Energy Recovery$134.99M3.37$22.96M$0.3823.21

Energy Recovery has a net margin of 15.07% compared to DMC Global's net margin of -4.28%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 10.89% beat DMC Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DMC Global-4.28% -6.02% -2.30%
Energy Recovery 15.07%10.89%9.55%

In the previous week, DMC Global and DMC Global both had 3 articles in the media. Energy Recovery's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat DMC Global's score of 0.52 indicating that Energy Recovery is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
DMC Global
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Energy Recovery
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Energy Recovery beats DMC Global on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does DMC Global compare to L.B. Foster?

L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) and DMC Global (NASDAQ:BOOM) are both small-cap industrial machinery companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 1.98% compared to DMC Global's net margin of -4.28%. L.B. Foster's return on equity of 6.36% beat DMC Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
L.B. Foster1.98% 6.36% 3.31%
DMC Global -4.28%-6.02%-2.30%

In the previous week, L.B. Foster had 1 more articles in the media than DMC Global. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for L.B. Foster and 3 mentions for DMC Global. DMC Global's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat L.B. Foster's score of 0.50 indicating that DMC Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
L.B. Foster
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
DMC Global
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

L.B. Foster has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DMC Global. DMC Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
L.B. Foster$563.36M0.83$7.55M$1.0343.36
DMC Global$586.15M0.21-$13.45M-$1.27N/A

80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.6% of DMC Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of DMC Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

L.B. Foster pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. DMC Global pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. L.B. Foster pays out 15.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. DMC Global pays out -39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. DMC Global is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

L.B. Foster currently has a consensus price target of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 28.35%. DMC Global has a consensus price target of $8.50, indicating a potential upside of 40.50%. Given DMC Global's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe DMC Global is more favorable than L.B. Foster.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
L.B. Foster
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
DMC Global
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DMC Global has a beta of 1.73, suggesting that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

L.B. Foster beats DMC Global on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does DMC Global compare to Columbus McKinnon?

DMC Global (NASDAQ:BOOM) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

DMC Global currently has a consensus price target of $8.50, indicating a potential upside of 40.50%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $22.00, indicating a potential upside of 52.19%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than DMC Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DMC Global
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Columbus McKinnon
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

DMC Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. DMC Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DMC Global$586.15M0.21-$13.45M-$1.27N/A
Columbus McKinnon$1.19B0.35-$229.54M-$5.48N/A

DMC Global pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. DMC Global pays out -39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out -5.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. DMC Global is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

DMC Global has a beta of 1.73, meaning that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

77.6% of DMC Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.1% of DMC Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 1 more articles in the media than DMC Global. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 3 mentions for DMC Global. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat DMC Global's score of 0.52 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
DMC Global
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Columbus McKinnon
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

DMC Global has a net margin of -4.28% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.23%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 7.09% beat DMC Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DMC Global-4.28% -6.02% -2.30%
Columbus McKinnon -19.23%7.09%2.39%

Summary

Columbus McKinnon beats DMC Global on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does DMC Global compare to Omega Flex?

Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) and DMC Global (NASDAQ:BOOM) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

DMC Global has a consensus price target of $8.50, suggesting a potential upside of 40.50%. Given DMC Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe DMC Global is more favorable than Omega Flex.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Omega Flex
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
DMC Global
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Omega Flex pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. DMC Global pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Omega Flex pays out 102.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. DMC Global pays out -39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Omega Flex has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. DMC Global is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, DMC Global had 1 more articles in the media than Omega Flex. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for DMC Global and 2 mentions for Omega Flex. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat DMC Global's score of 0.52 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Omega Flex
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
DMC Global
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Omega Flex has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DMC Global. DMC Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Omega Flex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Omega Flex$98.30M3.25$14.83M$1.3323.84
DMC Global$586.15M0.21-$13.45M-$1.27N/A

Omega Flex has a net margin of 13.60% compared to DMC Global's net margin of -4.28%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat DMC Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Omega Flex13.60% 15.94% 12.92%
DMC Global -4.28%-6.02%-2.30%

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DMC Global has a beta of 1.73, indicating that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the broader market.

36.1% of Omega Flex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.6% of DMC Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 65.2% of Omega Flex shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of DMC Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Omega Flex beats DMC Global on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does DMC Global compare to Ampco-Pittsburgh?

DMC Global (NASDAQ:BOOM) and Ampco-Pittsburgh (NYSE:AP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

DMC Global has a beta of 1.73, suggesting that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, DMC Global and DMC Global both had 3 articles in the media. DMC Global's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's score of -1.29 indicating that DMC Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
DMC Global
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ampco-Pittsburgh
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

DMC Global has a net margin of -4.28% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -15.53%. DMC Global's return on equity of -6.02% beat Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DMC Global-4.28% -6.02% -2.30%
Ampco-Pittsburgh -15.53%-7.56%-0.91%

77.6% of DMC Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.2% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by institutional investors. 7.1% of DMC Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.5% of Ampco-Pittsburgh shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

DMC Global presently has a consensus target price of $8.50, suggesting a potential upside of 40.50%. Given DMC Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe DMC Global is more favorable than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DMC Global
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Ampco-Pittsburgh
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

DMC Global has higher revenue and earnings than Ampco-Pittsburgh. DMC Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ampco-Pittsburgh, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DMC Global$586.15M0.21-$13.45M-$1.27N/A
Ampco-Pittsburgh$434.17M0.44-$66.07M-$3.36N/A

Summary

DMC Global beats Ampco-Pittsburgh on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get DMC Global News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BOOM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BOOM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BOOM vs. The Competition

MetricDMC GlobalIndustrial Services IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$123.43M$21.95B$9.67B$12.22B
Dividend YieldN/A6.82%3.54%6.12%
P/E Ratio-4.7622.5825.6124.17
Price / Sales0.211.894,851.7398.91
Price / Cash4.4413.8027.9854.37
Price / Book0.513.374.566.35
Net Income-$13.45M$712.91M$792.16M$337.63M
7 Day Performance-13.94%51.37%0.13%0.43%
1 Month Performance-15.50%-8.47%-0.85%0.14%
1 Year Performance-25.86%-0.42%21.49%27.64%

DMC Global Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BOOM
DMC Global
3.6463 of 5 stars
$6.05
+0.3%
$8.50
+40.5%
-16.7%$123.43M$586.15MN/A1,500
ERII
Energy Recovery
4.2145 of 5 stars
$8.83
-0.8%
$15.00
+69.9%
-28.9%$455.05M$134.99M23.23250
FSTR
L.B. Foster
2.7791 of 5 stars
$42.87
-2.0%
$32.00
-25.4%
+104.9%$448.42M$540.01M41.621,191
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon
4.5614 of 5 stars
$14.21
-2.3%
$22.00
+54.8%
-4.6%$407.80M$1.19BN/A7,300
OFLX
Omega Flex
1.7008 of 5 stars
$30.19
-3.1%
N/A-8.4%$304.62M$98.30M22.70170

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:BOOM) was last updated on 6/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners