Which has stronger valuation and earnings, HY or NNBR?

NN has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hyster-Yale. Hyster-Yale is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hyster-Yale $3.65B 0.16 -$60.10M -$5.59 N/A NN $434.97M 0.42 -$34M -$1.09 N/A

Is HY or NNBR more profitable?

Hyster-Yale has a net margin of -2.71% compared to NN's net margin of -7.85%. NN's return on equity of 4.54% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Hyster-Yale -2.71% -13.96% -3.44% NN -7.85% 4.54% 0.43%

Does the media favor HY or NNBR?

In the previous week, NN had 3 more articles in the media than Hyster-Yale. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for NN and 1 mentions for Hyster-Yale. NN's average media sentiment score of 0.19 beat Hyster-Yale's score of 0.00 indicating that NN is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hyster-Yale 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral NN 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, NNBR or FSTR?

L.B. Foster has higher revenue and earnings than NN. NN is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio NN $434.97M 0.42 -$34M -$1.09 N/A L.B. Foster $563.36M 0.79 $7.55M $1.03 41.51

Is NNBR or FSTR more profitable?

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 1.98% compared to NN's net margin of -7.85%. L.B. Foster's return on equity of 6.36% beat NN's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets NN -7.85% 4.54% 0.43% L.B. Foster 1.98% 6.36% 3.31%

Does the media refer more to NNBR or FSTR?

In the previous week, NN had 3 more articles in the media than L.B. Foster. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for NN and 1 mentions for L.B. Foster. L.B. Foster's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat NN's score of 0.19 indicating that L.B. Foster is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment NN 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral L.B. Foster 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, NNBR or ERII?

Energy Recovery has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NN. NN is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Recovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio NN $434.97M 0.42 -$34M -$1.09 N/A Energy Recovery $134.99M 3.38 $22.96M $0.38 23.26

Is NNBR or ERII more profitable?

Energy Recovery has a net margin of 15.07% compared to NN's net margin of -7.85%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 10.89% beat NN's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets NN -7.85% 4.54% 0.43% Energy Recovery 15.07% 10.89% 9.55%

Does the media refer more to NNBR or ERII?

In the previous week, NN and NN both had 4 articles in the media. Energy Recovery's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat NN's score of 0.19 indicating that Energy Recovery is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment NN 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Energy Recovery 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is NNBR or CMCO more profitable?

NN has a net margin of -7.85% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.23%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 7.09% beat NN's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets NN -7.85% 4.54% 0.43% Columbus McKinnon -19.23% 7.09% 2.39%

Does the media favor NNBR or CMCO?

In the previous week, NN had 2 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for NN and 2 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. NN's average media sentiment score of 0.19 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.00 indicating that NN is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment NN 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Columbus McKinnon 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate NNBR or OFLX?

NN presently has a consensus price target of $3.00, suggesting a potential downside of 14.04%. Given NN's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe NN is more favorable than Omega Flex. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score NN 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67 Omega Flex 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, NNBR or OFLX?

Omega Flex has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NN. NN is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Omega Flex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio NN $434.97M 0.42 -$34M -$1.09 N/A Omega Flex $98.30M 3.22 $14.83M $1.33 23.57

Is NNBR or OFLX more profitable?

Omega Flex has a net margin of 13.60% compared to NN's net margin of -7.85%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat NN's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets NN -7.85% 4.54% 0.43% Omega Flex 13.60% 15.94% 12.92%

Does the media prefer NNBR or OFLX?

In the previous week, NN and NN both had 4 articles in the media. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat NN's score of 0.19 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment NN 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Omega Flex 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

NN (NNBR) Competitors

$3.49 -0.50 (-12.53%)

Closing price 07/2/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$3.49 0.00 (-0.03%)

As of 07/2/2026 07:58 PM Eastern

Compare

NNBR vs. HY, FSTR, ERII, CMCO, and OFLX

Should you buy NN stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares NN with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with NN include Hyster-Yale (HY), L.B. Foster (FSTR), Energy Recovery (ERII), Columbus McKinnon (CMCO), and Omega Flex (OFLX). These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery" industry.

How does NN compare to Hyster-Yale?

Hyster-Yale (NYSE:HY) and NN (NASDAQ:NNBR) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Hyster-Yale pays an annual dividend of $1.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. NN pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. Hyster-Yale pays out -26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NN pays out -25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hyster-Yale has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Hyster-Yale currently has a consensus target price of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 40.59%. NN has a consensus target price of $3.00, suggesting a potential downside of 14.04%. Given Hyster-Yale's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Hyster-Yale is more favorable than NN.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hyster-Yale	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
NN	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67

Hyster-Yale has a net margin of -2.71% compared to NN's net margin of -7.85%. NN's return on equity of 4.54% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hyster-Yale	-2.71%	-13.96%	-3.44%
NN	-7.85%	4.54%	0.43%

In the previous week, NN had 3 more articles in the media than Hyster-Yale. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for NN and 1 mentions for Hyster-Yale. NN's average media sentiment score of 0.19 beat Hyster-Yale's score of 0.00 indicating that NN is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hyster-Yale	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
NN	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Hyster-Yale has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NN has a beta of 2.55, suggesting that its stock price is 155% more volatile than the broader market.

NN has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hyster-Yale. Hyster-Yale is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hyster-Yale	$3.65B	0.16	-$60.10M	-$5.59	N/A
NN	$434.97M	0.42	-$34M	-$1.09	N/A

46.5% of Hyster-Yale shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.9% of NN shares are held by institutional investors. 37.8% of Hyster-Yale shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.6% of NN shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

NN beats Hyster-Yale on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NN compare to L.B. Foster?

NN (NASDAQ:NNBR) and L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) are both small-cap industrial machinery companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, NN had 3 more articles in the media than L.B. Foster. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for NN and 1 mentions for L.B. Foster. L.B. Foster's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat NN's score of 0.19 indicating that L.B. Foster is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
NN	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
L.B. Foster	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

L.B. Foster has higher revenue and earnings than NN. NN is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NN	$434.97M	0.42	-$34M	-$1.09	N/A
L.B. Foster	$563.36M	0.79	$7.55M	$1.03	41.51

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 1.98% compared to NN's net margin of -7.85%. L.B. Foster's return on equity of 6.36% beat NN's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NN	-7.85%	4.54%	0.43%
L.B. Foster	1.98%	6.36%	3.31%

NN has a beta of 2.55, meaning that its stock price is 155% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

53.9% of NN shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by institutional investors. 19.6% of NN shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

NN pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. L.B. Foster pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. NN pays out -25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. L.B. Foster pays out 15.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. NN is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

NN presently has a consensus price target of $3.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.04%. L.B. Foster has a consensus price target of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 25.16%. Given NN's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NN is more favorable than L.B. Foster.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NN	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
L.B. Foster	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Summary

L.B. Foster beats NN on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NN compare to Energy Recovery?

NN (NASDAQ:NNBR) and Energy Recovery (NASDAQ:ERII) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

NN has a beta of 2.55, meaning that its stock price is 155% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Recovery has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Energy Recovery has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NN. NN is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Recovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NN	$434.97M	0.42	-$34M	-$1.09	N/A
Energy Recovery	$134.99M	3.38	$22.96M	$0.38	23.26

Energy Recovery has a net margin of 15.07% compared to NN's net margin of -7.85%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 10.89% beat NN's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NN	-7.85%	4.54%	0.43%
Energy Recovery	15.07%	10.89%	9.55%

53.9% of NN shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.6% of Energy Recovery shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.6% of NN shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Energy Recovery shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

NN presently has a consensus target price of $3.00, suggesting a potential downside of 14.04%. Energy Recovery has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 69.68%. Given Energy Recovery's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Energy Recovery is more favorable than NN.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NN	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
Energy Recovery	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, NN and NN both had 4 articles in the media. Energy Recovery's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat NN's score of 0.19 indicating that Energy Recovery is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
NN	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Energy Recovery	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Energy Recovery beats NN on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NN compare to Columbus McKinnon?

NN (NASDAQ:NNBR) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

NN pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. NN pays out -25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out -5.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. NN is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

53.9% of NN shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.6% of NN shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

NN presently has a consensus target price of $3.00, suggesting a potential downside of 14.04%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $22.00, suggesting a potential upside of 62.36%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than NN.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NN	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

NN has a beta of 2.55, meaning that its stock price is 155% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

NN has a net margin of -7.85% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.23%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 7.09% beat NN's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NN	-7.85%	4.54%	0.43%
Columbus McKinnon	-19.23%	7.09%	2.39%

NN has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. NN is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NN	$434.97M	0.42	-$34M	-$1.09	N/A
Columbus McKinnon	$1.19B	0.33	-$229.54M	-$5.48	N/A

In the previous week, NN had 2 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for NN and 2 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. NN's average media sentiment score of 0.19 beat Columbus McKinnon's score of 0.00 indicating that NN is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
NN	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Columbus McKinnon	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

NN beats Columbus McKinnon on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NN compare to Omega Flex?

NN (NASDAQ:NNBR) and Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

53.9% of NN shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.1% of Omega Flex shares are held by institutional investors. 19.6% of NN shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 65.2% of Omega Flex shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Omega Flex has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NN. NN is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Omega Flex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NN	$434.97M	0.42	-$34M	-$1.09	N/A
Omega Flex	$98.30M	3.22	$14.83M	$1.33	23.57

In the previous week, NN and NN both had 4 articles in the media. Omega Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat NN's score of 0.19 indicating that Omega Flex is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
NN	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Omega Flex	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

NN has a beta of 2.55, meaning that its stock price is 155% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Omega Flex has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

NN pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. Omega Flex pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. NN pays out -25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Omega Flex pays out 102.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Omega Flex has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. NN is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Omega Flex has a net margin of 13.60% compared to NN's net margin of -7.85%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 15.94% beat NN's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NN	-7.85%	4.54%	0.43%
Omega Flex	13.60%	15.94%	12.92%

NN presently has a consensus price target of $3.00, suggesting a potential downside of 14.04%. Given NN's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe NN is more favorable than Omega Flex.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NN	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
Omega Flex	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

Omega Flex beats NN on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get NN News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NNBR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

NNBR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	NN	METAL PROC&FABR Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$210.57M	$2.80B	$9.60B	$12.55B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.09%	3.54%	6.63%
P/E Ratio	-3.20	19.51	25.13	24.71
Price / Sales	0.42	14.92	4,779.26	95.30
Price / Cash	5.54	16.62	27.68	58.15
Price / Book	5.13	3.20	4.59	6.45
Net Income	-$34M	$91.82M	$791.01M	$336.71M
7 Day Performance	26.45%	-2.70%	0.59%	1.37%
1 Month Performance	18.71%	2.97%	-0.24%	1.67%
1 Year Performance	50.76%	57.14%	18.32%	24.05%

NN Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
NNBR NN	2.3018 of 5 stars	$3.49 -12.5%	$3.00 -14.0%	+53.1%	$210.57M	$434.97M	N/A	2,550	Gap Up
HY Hyster-Yale	3.1357 of 5 stars	$34.66 +1.3%	$45.00 +29.8%	-24.1%	$621.06M	$3.65B	N/A	7,500
FSTR L.B. Foster	2.0078 of 5 stars	$45.21 +0.6%	$32.00 -29.2%	+82.6%	$472.87M	$563.36M	43.90	1,191	Short Interest Increase
ERII Energy Recovery	4.6362 of 5 stars	$8.96 +1.6%	$15.00 +67.5%	-31.4%	$461.23M	$134.99M	23.55	250
CMCO Columbus McKinnon	4.4471 of 5 stars	$15.02 +4.2%	$22.00 +46.5%	-17.0%	$433.03M	$1.19B	N/A	7,300

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:NNBR) was last updated on 7/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

NN (NNBR) Competitors