Lithium Americas (LAC) Competitors

Lithium Americas logo
$4.32 -0.05 (-1.03%)
As of 01:19 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

LAC vs. AUGO, KNF, LEU, ERO, and TTAM

Should you buy Lithium Americas stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Lithium Americas with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Lithium Americas include Aura Minerals (AUGO), Knife River (KNF), Centrus Energy (LEU), Ero Copper (ERO), and Titan America (TTAM). These companies are all part of the "non-metallic and industrial metal mining" industry.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Aura Minerals?

Aura Minerals (NASDAQ:AUGO) and Lithium Americas (NYSE:LAC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk and earnings.

Aura Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aura Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aura Minerals$921.73M5.78-$79.34M$1.0858.85
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-$122.09M-$0.41N/A

Aura Minerals has a net margin of 7.80% compared to Lithium Americas' net margin of 0.00%. Aura Minerals' return on equity of 111.96% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aura Minerals7.80% 111.96% 19.71%
Lithium Americas N/A -10.70%-4.41%

Aura Minerals currently has a consensus target price of $67.60, suggesting a potential upside of 6.36%. Lithium Americas has a consensus target price of $5.56, suggesting a potential upside of 28.61%. Given Lithium Americas' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Lithium Americas is more favorable than Aura Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aura Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Lithium Americas
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09

In the previous week, Aura Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Aura Minerals and 1 mentions for Lithium Americas. Aura Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lithium Americas'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Aura Minerals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Lithium Americas
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Aura Minerals beats Lithium Americas on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Knife River?

Lithium Americas (NYSE:LAC) and Knife River (NYSE:KNF) are both non-metallic and industrial metal mining companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Knife River has a net margin of 4.58% compared to Lithium Americas' net margin of 0.00%. Knife River's return on equity of 9.35% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium AmericasN/A -10.70% -4.41%
Knife River 4.58%9.35%3.96%

Knife River has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Knife River, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-$122.09M-$0.41N/A
Knife River$3.15B1.58$157.07M$2.5734.05

Lithium Americas presently has a consensus target price of $5.56, suggesting a potential upside of 28.61%. Knife River has a consensus target price of $97.29, suggesting a potential upside of 11.16%. Given Lithium Americas' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Lithium Americas is more favorable than Knife River.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09
Knife River
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

80.1% of Knife River shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Lithium Americas shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Knife River shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Lithium Americas had 1 more articles in the media than Knife River. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Lithium Americas and 0 mentions for Knife River. Lithium Americas' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Knife River'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas Neutral
Knife River Neutral

Lithium Americas has a beta of 2.32, indicating that its stock price is 132% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Knife River has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Knife River beats Lithium Americas on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Centrus Energy?

Lithium Americas (NYSE:LAC) and Centrus Energy (NYSE:LEU) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Centrus Energy has a net margin of 13.40% compared to Lithium Americas' net margin of 0.00%. Centrus Energy's return on equity of 13.10% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium AmericasN/A -10.70% -4.41%
Centrus Energy 13.40%13.10%3.51%

50.0% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Lithium Americas shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lithium Americas presently has a consensus target price of $5.56, suggesting a potential upside of 28.61%. Centrus Energy has a consensus target price of $271.18, suggesting a potential upside of 51.02%. Given Centrus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Centrus Energy is more favorable than Lithium Americas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09
Centrus Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Lithium Americas has a beta of 2.32, suggesting that its stock price is 132% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Centrus Energy has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Centrus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centrus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-$122.09M-$0.41N/A
Centrus Energy$448.70M7.87$77.80M$3.0259.46

In the previous week, Centrus Energy had 8 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Centrus Energy and 1 mentions for Lithium Americas. Centrus Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Lithium Americas' score of 0.00 indicating that Centrus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Centrus Energy
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Centrus Energy beats Lithium Americas on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Ero Copper?

Lithium Americas (NYSE:LAC) and Ero Copper (NYSE:ERO) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability and institutional ownership.

71.3% of Ero Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Lithium Americas shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ero Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-$122.09M-$0.41N/A
Ero Copper$785.80M3.99$263.72M$2.8110.71

In the previous week, Ero Copper had 4 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Ero Copper and 1 mentions for Lithium Americas. Ero Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Lithium Americas' score of 0.00 indicating that Ero Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ero Copper
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Lithium Americas has a beta of 2.32, meaning that its share price is 132% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ero Copper has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Lithium Americas currently has a consensus price target of $5.56, suggesting a potential upside of 28.61%. Ero Copper has a consensus price target of $31.50, suggesting a potential upside of 4.68%. Given Lithium Americas' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Lithium Americas is more favorable than Ero Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09
Ero Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

Ero Copper has a net margin of 31.63% compared to Lithium Americas' net margin of 0.00%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 27.33% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium AmericasN/A -10.70% -4.41%
Ero Copper 31.63%27.33%13.47%

Summary

Ero Copper beats Lithium Americas on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Titan America?

Titan America (NYSE:TTAM) and Lithium Americas (NYSE:LAC) are both non-metallic and industrial metal mining companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Titan America had 1 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Titan America and 1 mentions for Lithium Americas. Titan America's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Lithium Americas' score of 0.00 indicating that Titan America is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Titan America
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Lithium Americas
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Titan America has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Titan America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Titan America$1.66B2.03$185.44M$1.0118.10
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-$122.09M-$0.41N/A

Titan America presently has a consensus price target of $17.42, indicating a potential downside of 4.75%. Lithium Americas has a consensus price target of $5.56, indicating a potential upside of 28.61%. Given Lithium Americas' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Lithium Americas is more favorable than Titan America.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Titan America
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14
Lithium Americas
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09

Titan America has a net margin of 11.08% compared to Lithium Americas' net margin of 0.00%. Titan America's return on equity of 18.35% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Titan America11.08% 18.35% 9.91%
Lithium Americas N/A -10.70%-4.41%

Titan America has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lithium Americas has a beta of 2.32, meaning that its share price is 132% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Titan America beats Lithium Americas on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lithium Americas News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LAC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LAC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LAC vs. The Competition

MetricLithium AmericasMINING IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.52B$9.54B$4.75B$23.32B
Dividend YieldN/A1.76%5.00%4.06%
P/E Ratio-10.5515.6723.2631.55
Price / SalesN/A188.966,006.0222.54
Price / CashN/A38.0424.3018.67
Price / Book1.284.269.064.68
Net Income-$122.09M$317.48M$157.26M$1.08B
7 Day Performance-5.88%-3.29%-1.69%-0.86%
1 Month Performance-11.64%-5.10%-2.44%0.54%
1 Year Performance70.61%92.13%56.43%24.81%

Lithium Americas Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LAC
Lithium Americas
1.9248 of 5 stars
$4.33
-1.0%
$5.56
+28.6%
+72.6%$1.52BN/AN/A749
AUGO
Aura Minerals
2.9469 of 5 stars
$66.18
+8.7%
$67.60
+2.1%
N/A$5.55B$921.73M61.281,462
KNF
Knife River
2.1393 of 5 stars
$80.80
+5.0%
$97.29
+20.4%
+11.3%$4.59B$3.15B31.445,298
LEU
Centrus Energy
3.3471 of 5 stars
$176.65
+8.7%
$268.18
+51.8%
+1.0%$3.47B$448.70M58.49280
ERO
Ero Copper
4.1486 of 5 stars
$30.71
+4.5%
$31.50
+2.6%
+94.7%$3.20B$785.80M10.933,547

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:LAC) was last updated on 6/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners