Free Trial

Lithium Americas (LAC) Competitors

Lithium Americas logo
$5.78 +0.22 (+3.86%)
Closing price 05/11/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$5.73 -0.06 (-1.02%)
As of 07:41 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

LAC vs. AUGO, KNF, LEU, TTAM, and ERO

Should you be buying Lithium Americas stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Lithium Americas include Aura Minerals (AUGO), Knife River (KNF), Centrus Energy (LEU), Titan America (TTAM), and Ero Copper (ERO). These companies are all part of the "non-metallic and industrial metal mining" industry.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Aura Minerals?

Aura Minerals (NASDAQ:AUGO) and Lithium Americas (NYSE:LAC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

Aura Minerals has a net margin of 7.80% compared to Lithium Americas' net margin of 0.00%. Aura Minerals' return on equity of 111.96% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aura Minerals7.80% 111.96% 19.71%
Lithium Americas N/A -15.07%-6.55%

In the previous week, Aura Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Aura Minerals and 10 mentions for Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas' average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Aura Minerals' score of 0.80 indicating that Lithium Americas is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Aura Minerals
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Lithium Americas
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Aura Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aura Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aura Minerals$921.73M7.37-$79.34M$1.0875.06
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-$122.09M-$0.46N/A

Aura Minerals presently has a consensus price target of $67.60, suggesting a potential downside of 16.60%. Lithium Americas has a consensus price target of $5.71, suggesting a potential downside of 1.22%. Given Lithium Americas' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Lithium Americas is more favorable than Aura Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aura Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Lithium Americas
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09

Summary

Aura Minerals beats Lithium Americas on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Knife River?

Lithium Americas (NYSE:LAC) and Knife River (NYSE:KNF) are both non-metallic and industrial metal mining companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

80.1% of Knife River shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Lithium Americas shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Knife River shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lithium Americas currently has a consensus price target of $5.71, indicating a potential downside of 1.22%. Knife River has a consensus price target of $98.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.36%. Given Knife River's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Knife River is more favorable than Lithium Americas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09
Knife River
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Knife River has a net margin of 4.58% compared to Lithium Americas' net margin of 0.00%. Knife River's return on equity of 9.35% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium AmericasN/A -15.07% -6.55%
Knife River 4.58%9.35%3.96%

In the previous week, Knife River had 9 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Knife River and 10 mentions for Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas' average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Knife River's score of 0.60 indicating that Lithium Americas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Knife River
4 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Knife River has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Knife River, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-$122.09M-$0.46N/A
Knife River$3.15B1.55$157.07M$2.5733.34

Lithium Americas has a beta of 2.5, meaning that its share price is 150% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Knife River has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Knife River beats Lithium Americas on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Centrus Energy?

Centrus Energy (NYSE:LEU) and Lithium Americas (NYSE:LAC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Centrus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centrus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Centrus Energy$452.30M9.24$77.80M$3.0270.41
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-$122.09M-$0.46N/A

In the previous week, Centrus Energy had 27 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Centrus Energy and 10 mentions for Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas' average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Centrus Energy's score of 0.46 indicating that Lithium Americas is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Centrus Energy
12 Very Positive mention(s)
8 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Lithium Americas
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Centrus Energy has a net margin of 13.40% compared to Lithium Americas' net margin of 0.00%. Centrus Energy's return on equity of 13.10% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Centrus Energy13.40% 13.10% 3.51%
Lithium Americas N/A -15.07%-6.55%

Centrus Energy presently has a consensus price target of $268.18, indicating a potential upside of 26.12%. Lithium Americas has a consensus price target of $5.71, indicating a potential downside of 1.22%. Given Centrus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Centrus Energy is more favorable than Lithium Americas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Centrus Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Lithium Americas
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09

50.0% of Centrus Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Centrus Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Lithium Americas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Centrus Energy has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lithium Americas has a beta of 2.5, suggesting that its stock price is 150% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Centrus Energy beats Lithium Americas on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Titan America?

Titan America (NYSE:TTAM) and Lithium Americas (NYSE:LAC) are both non-metallic and industrial metal mining companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, Titan America had 10 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Titan America and 10 mentions for Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas' average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Titan America's score of -0.05 indicating that Lithium Americas is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Titan America
1 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Lithium Americas
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Titan America has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Titan America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Titan America$1.66B1.84$185.44M$1.0116.46
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-$122.09M-$0.46N/A

Titan America has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lithium Americas has a beta of 2.5, suggesting that its share price is 150% more volatile than the broader market.

Titan America has a net margin of 11.08% compared to Lithium Americas' net margin of 0.00%. Titan America's return on equity of 18.35% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Titan America11.08% 18.35% 9.91%
Lithium Americas N/A -15.07%-6.55%

Titan America currently has a consensus price target of $17.42, indicating a potential upside of 4.76%. Lithium Americas has a consensus price target of $5.71, indicating a potential downside of 1.22%. Given Titan America's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Titan America is more favorable than Lithium Americas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Titan America
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Lithium Americas
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09

Summary

Titan America beats Lithium Americas on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Ero Copper?

Lithium Americas (NYSE:LAC) and Ero Copper (NYSE:ERO) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Lithium Americas had 4 more articles in the media than Ero Copper. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Lithium Americas and 6 mentions for Ero Copper. Lithium Americas' average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Ero Copper's score of -0.06 indicating that Lithium Americas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ero Copper
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Ero Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-$122.09M-$0.46N/A
Ero Copper$923.93M3.27$263.72M$2.8110.31

Ero Copper has a net margin of 31.63% compared to Lithium Americas' net margin of 0.00%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 29.86% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium AmericasN/A -15.07% -6.55%
Ero Copper 31.63%29.86%14.08%

Lithium Americas has a beta of 2.5, indicating that its share price is 150% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ero Copper has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

71.3% of Ero Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Lithium Americas shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lithium Americas currently has a consensus price target of $5.71, indicating a potential downside of 1.22%. Ero Copper has a consensus price target of $31.50, indicating a potential upside of 8.72%. Given Ero Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ero Copper is more favorable than Lithium Americas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09
Ero Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

Summary

Ero Copper beats Lithium Americas on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lithium Americas News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LAC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LAC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LAC vs. The Competition

MetricLithium AmericasMINING IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.93B$10.13B$4.92B$22.90B
Dividend YieldN/A1.58%4.96%4.03%
P/E Ratio-12.5816.4523.3628.91
Price / SalesN/A206.277,501.46108.04
Price / CashN/A40.0524.4619.21
Price / Book1.725.177.084.65
Net Income-$122.09M$315.03M$159.16M$1.07B
7 Day Performance4.90%6.53%4.36%-0.14%
1 Month Performance42.31%13.91%4.61%3.95%
1 Year Performance83.94%146.75%85.75%25.39%

Lithium Americas Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LAC
Lithium Americas
1.613 of 5 stars
$5.79
+3.9%
$5.71
-1.2%
+83.1%$1.93BN/AN/A749
AUGO
Aura Minerals
2.4197 of 5 stars
$81.70
-0.6%
$67.60
-17.3%
N/A$6.85B$921.73MN/A1,462
KNF
Knife River
2.9412 of 5 stars
$89.97
-3.2%
$97.29
+8.1%
-9.7%$5.11B$3.15B32.605,298
LEU
Centrus Energy
3.7847 of 5 stars
$206.43
-0.1%
$268.82
+30.2%
+127.2%$4.06B$448.70M49.50280
TTAM
Titan America
2.6635 of 5 stars
$16.13
-3.9%
$17.00
+5.4%
+19.6%$2.97B$1.66B15.822,554

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:LAC) was last updated on 5/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners