Go Pro

Ero Copper (ERO) Competitors

Ero Copper logo
$39.41 -0.01 (-0.03%)
As of 08/21/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

ERO vs. FCX, HBM, SCCO, TECK, and SLSR

Should you buy Ero Copper stock or one of its competitors? Ero Copper's main competitors and comparable companies include Freeport-McMoRan (FCX), HudBay Minerals (HBM), Southern Copper (SCCO), Teck Resources (TECK), and Solaris Resources (SLSR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Ero Copper compare to Freeport-McMoRan?

Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) and Ero Copper (NYSE:ERO) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Freeport-McMoRan had 19 more articles in the media than Ero Copper. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Freeport-McMoRan and 11 mentions for Ero Copper. Freeport-McMoRan's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.61 indicating that Freeport-McMoRan is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Freeport-McMoRan
23 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ero Copper
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Freeport-McMoRan has higher revenue and earnings than Ero Copper. Ero Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freeport-McMoRan, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freeport-McMoRan$25.92B4.25$2.20B$2.0337.77
Ero Copper$785.80M5.23$263.72M$2.9813.22

Freeport-McMoRan has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ero Copper has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

80.8% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.3% of Ero Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ero Copper has a net margin of 29.79% compared to Freeport-McMoRan's net margin of 11.39%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 30.32% beat Freeport-McMoRan's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Freeport-McMoRan11.39% 10.63% 5.69%
Ero Copper 29.79%30.32%15.17%

Freeport-McMoRan presently has a consensus price target of $70.27, suggesting a potential downside of 8.36%. Ero Copper has a consensus price target of $32.33, suggesting a potential downside of 17.96%. Given Freeport-McMoRan's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Freeport-McMoRan is more favorable than Ero Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Freeport-McMoRan
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
19 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91
Ero Copper
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

Summary

Freeport-McMoRan beats Ero Copper on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ero Copper compare to HudBay Minerals?

Ero Copper (NYSE:ERO) and HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

Ero Copper currently has a consensus target price of $32.33, indicating a potential downside of 17.96%. HudBay Minerals has a consensus target price of $31.33, indicating a potential upside of 4.17%. Given HudBay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe HudBay Minerals is more favorable than Ero Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ero Copper
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53
HudBay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

Ero Copper has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

Ero Copper has a net margin of 29.79% compared to HudBay Minerals' net margin of 27.48%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 30.32% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ero Copper29.79% 30.32% 15.17%
HudBay Minerals 27.48%9.47%5.44%

HudBay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Ero Copper. Ero Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ero Copper$785.80M5.23$263.72M$2.9813.22
HudBay Minerals$2.21B6.04$568.50M$1.7017.69

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Ero Copper. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for HudBay Minerals and 11 mentions for Ero Copper. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.61 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ero Copper
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
HudBay Minerals
11 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

71.3% of Ero Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

HudBay Minerals beats Ero Copper on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ero Copper compare to Southern Copper?

Southern Copper (NYSE:SCCO) and Ero Copper (NYSE:ERO) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

Southern Copper has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ero Copper has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

7.9% of Southern Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.3% of Ero Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Southern Copper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Southern Copper presently has a consensus target price of $146.84, indicating a potential downside of 32.11%. Ero Copper has a consensus target price of $32.33, indicating a potential downside of 17.96%. Given Ero Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ero Copper is more favorable than Southern Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Southern Copper
7 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.73
Ero Copper
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

Southern Copper has a net margin of 35.87% compared to Ero Copper's net margin of 29.79%. Southern Copper's return on equity of 49.04% beat Ero Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Southern Copper35.87% 49.04% 25.81%
Ero Copper 29.79%30.32%15.17%

Southern Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Ero Copper. Ero Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Southern Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Southern Copper$13.42B13.45$4.33B$6.8431.62
Ero Copper$785.80M5.23$263.72M$2.9813.22

In the previous week, Southern Copper had 16 more articles in the media than Ero Copper. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Southern Copper and 11 mentions for Ero Copper. Southern Copper's average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.61 indicating that Southern Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Southern Copper
26 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ero Copper
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Southern Copper beats Ero Copper on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ero Copper compare to Teck Resources?

Teck Resources (NYSE:TECK) and Ero Copper (NYSE:ERO) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Teck Resources currently has a consensus price target of $62.25, suggesting a potential downside of 10.04%. Ero Copper has a consensus price target of $32.33, suggesting a potential downside of 17.96%. Given Teck Resources' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Teck Resources is more favorable than Ero Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Teck Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.46
Ero Copper
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

78.1% of Teck Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.3% of Ero Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Teck Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ero Copper has a net margin of 29.79% compared to Teck Resources' net margin of 17.85%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 30.32% beat Teck Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Teck Resources17.85% 10.42% 6.07%
Ero Copper 29.79%30.32%15.17%

In the previous week, Ero Copper had 7 more articles in the media than Teck Resources. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Ero Copper and 4 mentions for Teck Resources. Teck Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.61 indicating that Teck Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Teck Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ero Copper
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Teck Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Ero Copper. Ero Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teck Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Teck Resources$7.70B4.34$1.00B$3.6918.75
Ero Copper$785.80M5.23$263.72M$2.9813.22

Teck Resources has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ero Copper has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Teck Resources and Ero Copper tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ero Copper compare to Solaris Resources?

Solaris Resources (NYSEAMERICAN:SLSR) and Ero Copper (NYSE:ERO) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, Ero Copper had 9 more articles in the media than Solaris Resources. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Ero Copper and 2 mentions for Solaris Resources. Solaris Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.61 indicating that Solaris Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Solaris Resources
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Ero Copper
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

71.3% of Ero Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ero Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Solaris Resources.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Solaris ResourcesN/AN/A-$42.23MN/AN/A
Ero Copper$785.80M5.23$263.72M$2.9813.22

Solaris Resources has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ero Copper has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Ero Copper has a net margin of 29.79% compared to Solaris Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 30.32% beat Solaris Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Solaris ResourcesN/A N/A -43.67%
Ero Copper 29.79%30.32%15.17%

Solaris Resources currently has a consensus target price of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 102.25%. Ero Copper has a consensus target price of $32.33, suggesting a potential downside of 17.96%. Given Solaris Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Solaris Resources is more favorable than Ero Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Solaris Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ero Copper
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

Summary

Ero Copper beats Solaris Resources on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ero Copper News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ERO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ERO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ERO vs. The Competition

MetricEro CopperMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$4.11B$4.10B$5.12B$24.24B
Dividend YieldN/A5.18%4.68%3.70%
P/E Ratio13.2225.7026.6130.31
Price / Sales5.237,479.474,446.5120.17
Price / Cash12.7526.6824.7119.80
Price / Book4.3810.719.024.90
Net Income$263.72M$122.81M$154.52M$1.07B
7 Day Performance12.73%2.84%2.36%0.02%
1 Month Performance51.76%13.09%10.54%3.10%
1 Year Performance173.97%57.88%45.70%14.90%

Ero Copper Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ERO
Ero Copper
3.4944 of 5 stars
$39.41
0.0%
$32.33
-18.0%
+174.0%$4.11B$785.80M13.223,547
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan
4.5857 of 5 stars
$76.31
+7.1%
$70.27
-7.9%
+77.3%$109.58B$25.87B37.5929,000
HBM
HudBay Minerals
4.7716 of 5 stars
$29.53
+4.9%
$31.33
+6.1%
+155.7%$13.12B$2.21B17.373,072
SCCO
Southern Copper
2.2195 of 5 stars
$211.30
+6.3%
$146.84
-30.5%
+126.5%$176.29B$15.79B30.8916,617
TECK
Teck Resources
2.4195 of 5 stars
$68.40
+3.4%
$62.25
-9.0%
+106.0%$33.04B$13.99B18.547,400

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:ERO) was last updated on 8/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners