Ternium (TX) Competitors

In the previous week, POSCO had 2 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for POSCO and 2 mentions for Ternium. POSCO's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Ternium's score of 0.34 indicating that POSCO is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

POSCO has higher revenue and earnings than Ternium. Ternium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than POSCO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ternium has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, POSCO has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

Ternium pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. POSCO pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Ternium pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. POSCO pays out 37.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

12.0% of Ternium shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Ternium shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of POSCO shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to POSCO's net margin of 1.79%. Ternium's return on equity of 4.26% beat POSCO's return on equity.

Ternium currently has a consensus price target of $51.50, suggesting a potential downside of 11.05%. Given Ternium's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Ternium is more favorable than POSCO.

In the previous week, Gerdau had 1 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Gerdau and 2 mentions for Ternium. Gerdau's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Ternium's score of 0.34 indicating that Gerdau is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Gerdau has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ternium has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Ternium has higher revenue and earnings than Gerdau. Ternium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gerdau, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

1.5% of Gerdau shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.0% of Ternium shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Gerdau shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Ternium shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gerdau currently has a consensus target price of $5.45, suggesting a potential upside of 9.88%. Ternium has a consensus target price of $51.50, suggesting a potential downside of 11.05%. Given Gerdau's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gerdau is more favorable than Ternium.

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Gerdau's net margin of 3.37%. Gerdau's return on equity of 7.97% beat Ternium's return on equity.

Gerdau pays an annual dividend of $0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Ternium pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Gerdau pays out 65.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ternium pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.52, indicating that its share price is 52% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ternium has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

86.9% of Commercial Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.0% of Ternium shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Commercial Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Ternium shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Commercial Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Ternium pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Commercial Metals pays out 15.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ternium pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Commercial Metals has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Ternium's net margin of 4.37%. Commercial Metals' return on equity of 15.69% beat Ternium's return on equity.

In the previous week, Commercial Metals had 9 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Commercial Metals and 2 mentions for Ternium. Commercial Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat Ternium's score of 0.34 indicating that Commercial Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Commercial Metals presently has a consensus price target of $81.18, suggesting a potential upside of 18.03%. Ternium has a consensus price target of $51.50, suggesting a potential downside of 11.05%. Given Commercial Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Commercial Metals is more favorable than Ternium.

Ternium has higher revenue and earnings than Commercial Metals. Commercial Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ternium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

12.0% of Ternium shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Ternium shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ternium has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ternium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ternium presently has a consensus price target of $51.50, indicating a potential downside of 11.05%. Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $11.96, indicating a potential downside of 2.92%. Given Cleveland-Cliffs' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more favorable than Ternium.

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Ternium's return on equity of 4.26% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 13 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 2 mentions for Ternium. Cleveland-Cliffs' average media sentiment score of 1.49 beat Ternium's score of 0.34 indicating that Cleveland-Cliffs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Ternium has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.1, meaning that its share price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.