Which has preferable earnings & valuation, TX or STLD?

Steel Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than Ternium. Ternium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Steel Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ternium $15.61B 0.72 $425.23M $3.56 15.72 Steel Dynamics $18.18B 1.85 $1.19B $11.03 21.24

Is TX or STLD more profitable?

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Ternium's net margin of 4.37%. Steel Dynamics' return on equity of 18.12% beat Ternium's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ternium 4.37% 4.26% 2.92% Steel Dynamics 7.83% 18.12% 9.81%

Does the media favor TX or STLD?

In the previous week, Steel Dynamics had 28 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Steel Dynamics and 5 mentions for Ternium. Ternium's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Steel Dynamics' score of 0.74 indicating that Ternium is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ternium 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Steel Dynamics 11 Very Positive mention(s) 18 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer PKX or TX?

Ternium has a consensus price target of $54.50, suggesting a potential downside of 2.59%. Given Ternium's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ternium is more favorable than POSCO. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score POSCO 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 Ternium 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 6 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.73

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, PKX or TX?

POSCO has higher revenue and earnings than Ternium. Ternium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than POSCO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio POSCO $48.64B 0.35 $483.48M $2.64 21.32 Ternium $15.61B 0.72 $425.23M $3.56 15.72

Is PKX or TX more profitable?

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to POSCO's net margin of 1.79%. Ternium's return on equity of 4.26% beat POSCO's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets POSCO 1.79% 1.99% 1.18% Ternium 4.37% 4.26% 2.92%

Does the media refer more to PKX or TX?

In the previous week, POSCO had 1 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for POSCO and 5 mentions for Ternium. Ternium's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat POSCO's score of 0.73 indicating that Ternium is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment POSCO 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ternium 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, GGB or TX?

Ternium has higher revenue and earnings than Gerdau. Ternium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gerdau, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gerdau $12.51B 0.77 $248.41M $0.23 21.24 Ternium $15.61B 0.72 $425.23M $3.56 15.72

Is GGB or TX more profitable?

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Gerdau's net margin of 3.37%. Gerdau's return on equity of 7.97% beat Ternium's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Gerdau 3.37% 7.97% 5.18% Ternium 4.37% 4.26% 2.92%

Does the media favor GGB or TX?

In the previous week, Gerdau had 4 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Gerdau and 5 mentions for Ternium. Ternium's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Gerdau's score of 0.41 indicating that Ternium is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gerdau 3 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Ternium 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, TX or CMC?

Ternium has higher revenue and earnings than Commercial Metals. Commercial Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ternium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ternium $15.61B 0.72 $425.23M $3.56 15.72 Commercial Metals $7.80B 0.92 $84.66M $5.31 12.18

Does the media refer more to TX or CMC?

In the previous week, Ternium had 1 more articles in the media than Commercial Metals. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Ternium and 4 mentions for Commercial Metals. Ternium's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Commercial Metals' score of 0.81 indicating that Ternium is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ternium 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Commercial Metals 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is CLF or TX more profitable?

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Ternium's return on equity of 4.26% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cleveland-Cliffs -4.56% -13.37% -3.96% Ternium 4.37% 4.26% 2.92%

Does the media refer more to CLF or TX?

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 6 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 5 mentions for Ternium. Ternium's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 0.41 indicating that Ternium is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cleveland-Cliffs 4 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Ternium 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Ternium (TX) Competitors

$55.95 -0.48 (-0.85%)

Closing price 09/23/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$55.99 +0.04 (+0.08%)

As of 09/23/2026 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

TX vs. STLD, PKX, GGB, CMC, and CLF

Should you buy Ternium stock or one of its competitors? Ternium's main competitors and comparable companies include Steel Dynamics (STLD), POSCO (PKX), Gerdau (GGB), Commercial Metals (CMC), and Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "steel" industry.

How does Ternium compare to Steel Dynamics?

Ternium (NYSE:TX) and Steel Dynamics (NASDAQ:STLD) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Ternium's net margin of 4.37%. Steel Dynamics' return on equity of 18.12% beat Ternium's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ternium	4.37%	4.26%	2.92%
Steel Dynamics	7.83%	18.12%	9.81%

12.0% of Ternium shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Steel Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Ternium shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Steel Dynamics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ternium presently has a consensus target price of $54.50, suggesting a potential downside of 2.59%. Steel Dynamics has a consensus target price of $258.55, suggesting a potential upside of 10.35%. Given Steel Dynamics' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Steel Dynamics is more favorable than Ternium.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ternium	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Steel Dynamics	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Ternium pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Steel Dynamics pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Ternium pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 19.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Steel Dynamics has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years.

Steel Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than Ternium. Ternium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Steel Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ternium	$15.61B	0.72	$425.23M	$3.56	15.72
Steel Dynamics	$18.18B	1.85	$1.19B	$11.03	21.24

In the previous week, Steel Dynamics had 28 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Steel Dynamics and 5 mentions for Ternium. Ternium's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Steel Dynamics' score of 0.74 indicating that Ternium is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ternium	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Steel Dynamics	11 Very Positive mention(s)	18 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ternium has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Steel Dynamics beats Ternium on 16 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ternium compare to POSCO?

POSCO (NYSE:PKX) and Ternium (NYSE:TX) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

POSCO has higher revenue and earnings than Ternium. Ternium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than POSCO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
POSCO	$48.64B	0.35	$483.48M	$2.64	21.32
Ternium	$15.61B	0.72	$425.23M	$3.56	15.72

In the previous week, POSCO had 1 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for POSCO and 5 mentions for Ternium. Ternium's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat POSCO's score of 0.73 indicating that Ternium is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
POSCO	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ternium	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ternium has a consensus price target of $54.50, suggesting a potential downside of 2.59%. Given Ternium's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ternium is more favorable than POSCO.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
POSCO	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Ternium	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to POSCO's net margin of 1.79%. Ternium's return on equity of 4.26% beat POSCO's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
POSCO	1.79%	1.99%	1.18%
Ternium	4.37%	4.26%	2.92%

POSCO has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ternium has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

12.0% of Ternium shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of POSCO shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Ternium shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

POSCO pays an annual dividend of $1.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Ternium pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. POSCO pays out 43.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ternium pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Ternium beats POSCO on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ternium compare to Gerdau?

Gerdau (NYSE:GGB) and Ternium (NYSE:TX) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Gerdau pays an annual dividend of $0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Ternium pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Gerdau pays out 65.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ternium pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

1.5% of Gerdau shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.0% of Ternium shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Gerdau shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Ternium shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Gerdau had 4 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Gerdau and 5 mentions for Ternium. Ternium's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Gerdau's score of 0.41 indicating that Ternium is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gerdau	3 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Ternium	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Gerdau presently has a consensus target price of $5.58, suggesting a potential upside of 14.12%. Ternium has a consensus target price of $54.50, suggesting a potential downside of 2.59%. Given Gerdau's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Gerdau is more favorable than Ternium.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gerdau	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44
Ternium	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

Gerdau has a beta of 1.49, suggesting that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ternium has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Gerdau's net margin of 3.37%. Gerdau's return on equity of 7.97% beat Ternium's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gerdau	3.37%	7.97%	5.18%
Ternium	4.37%	4.26%	2.92%

Ternium has higher revenue and earnings than Gerdau. Ternium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gerdau, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gerdau	$12.51B	0.77	$248.41M	$0.23	21.24
Ternium	$15.61B	0.72	$425.23M	$3.56	15.72

Summary

Ternium beats Gerdau on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ternium compare to Commercial Metals?

Ternium (NYSE:TX) and Commercial Metals (NYSE:CMC) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Ternium's net margin of 4.37%. Commercial Metals' return on equity of 15.69% beat Ternium's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ternium	4.37%	4.26%	2.92%
Commercial Metals	6.72%	15.69%	7.65%

12.0% of Ternium shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.9% of Commercial Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Ternium shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Commercial Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ternium presently has a consensus price target of $54.50, indicating a potential downside of 2.59%. Commercial Metals has a consensus price target of $81.64, indicating a potential upside of 26.22%. Given Commercial Metals' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Commercial Metals is more favorable than Ternium.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ternium	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Commercial Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

In the previous week, Ternium had 1 more articles in the media than Commercial Metals. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Ternium and 4 mentions for Commercial Metals. Ternium's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Commercial Metals' score of 0.81 indicating that Ternium is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ternium	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Commercial Metals	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ternium has higher revenue and earnings than Commercial Metals. Commercial Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ternium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ternium	$15.61B	0.72	$425.23M	$3.56	15.72
Commercial Metals	$7.80B	0.92	$84.66M	$5.31	12.18

Ternium pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Commercial Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Ternium pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 15.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Commercial Metals has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Ternium has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.52, indicating that its share price is 52% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Commercial Metals beats Ternium on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ternium compare to Cleveland-Cliffs?

Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) and Ternium (NYSE:TX) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

Cleveland-Cliffs presently has a consensus price target of $12.25, indicating a potential downside of 4.71%. Ternium has a consensus price target of $54.50, indicating a potential downside of 2.59%. Given Ternium's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ternium is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cleveland-Cliffs	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Ternium	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

Ternium has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ternium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cleveland-Cliffs	$18.61B	0.39	-$1.48B	-$1.62	N/A
Ternium	$15.61B	0.72	$425.23M	$3.56	15.72

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Ternium's return on equity of 4.26% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cleveland-Cliffs	-4.56%	-13.37%	-3.96%
Ternium	4.37%	4.26%	2.92%

67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.0% of Ternium shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Ternium shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 6 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 5 mentions for Ternium. Ternium's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 0.41 indicating that Ternium is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cleveland-Cliffs	4 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Ternium	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its share price is 110% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ternium has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ternium beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ternium News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TX vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Ternium	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$11.31B	$3.96B	$4.94B	$23.09B
Dividend Yield	4.61%	5.21%	4.71%	3.61%
P/E Ratio	15.72	25.76	26.09	28.10
Price / Sales	0.72	29,728.73	17,643.22	20.14
Price / Cash	9.32	29.47	26.89	38.68
Price / Book	0.69	12.19	10.13	4.66
Net Income	$425.23M	$127.53M	$158.14M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-3.48%	0.79%	0.47%	-1.27%
1 Month Performance	1.52%	-2.30%	-2.21%	-4.71%
1 Year Performance	62.50%	30.25%	25.39%	7.48%

Ternium Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TX Ternium	4.9129 of 5 stars	$55.95 -0.9%	$54.50 -2.6%	+63.7%	$11.31B	$15.61B	15.72	33,253
STLD Steel Dynamics	4.8501 of 5 stars	$234.53 -2.2%	$258.45 +10.2%	+71.4%	$33.61B	$20.54B	21.26	14,400
PKX POSCO	3.0373 of 5 stars	$59.61 -5.3%	N/A	+13.6%	$19.04B	$48.64B	22.58	42,873
GGB Gerdau	3.945 of 5 stars	$4.90 -5.0%	$5.58 +13.9%	+54.8%	$10.11B	$69.54B	21.28	25,817	News Coverage Insider Trade
CMC Commercial Metals	4.948 of 5 stars	$64.99 -3.2%	$81.64 +25.6%	+13.5%	$7.43B	$7.80B	12.24	12,690

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:TX) was last updated on 9/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Ternium (TX) Competitors

TX vs. STLD, PKX, GGB, CMC, and CLF

How does Ternium compare to Steel Dynamics?

Summary

How does Ternium compare to POSCO?

Summary

How does Ternium compare to Gerdau?

Summary

How does Ternium compare to Commercial Metals?

Summary

How does Ternium compare to Cleveland-Cliffs?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TX vs. The Competition

Ternium Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Ternium (TX) Competitors

TX vs. STLD, PKX, GGB, CMC, and CLF

How does Ternium compare to Steel Dynamics?

Is TX or STLD more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in TX or STLD?

Do analysts prefer TX or STLD?

Is TX or STLD a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, TX or STLD?

Does the media favor TX or STLD?

Which has more risk and volatility, TX or STLD?

Summary

How does Ternium compare to POSCO?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, PKX or TX?

Does the media refer more to PKX or TX?

Do analysts prefer PKX or TX?

Is PKX or TX more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, PKX or TX?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of PKX or TX?

Is PKX or TX a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Ternium compare to Gerdau?

Is GGB or TX a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in GGB or TX?

Does the media favor GGB or TX?

Do analysts rate GGB or TX?

Which has more volatility and risk, GGB or TX?

Is GGB or TX more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, GGB or TX?

Summary

How does Ternium compare to Commercial Metals?

Is TX or CMC more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of TX or CMC?

Do analysts recommend TX or CMC?

Does the media refer more to TX or CMC?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, TX or CMC?

Is TX or CMC a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, TX or CMC?

Summary

How does Ternium compare to Cleveland-Cliffs?

Do analysts recommend CLF or TX?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CLF or TX?

Is CLF or TX more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in CLF or TX?

Does the media refer more to CLF or TX?

Which has more volatility and risk, CLF or TX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TX vs. The Competition

Ternium Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools