Ternium (TX) Competitors

In the previous week, Ternium had 2 more articles in the media than POSCO. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Ternium and 2 mentions for POSCO. POSCO's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Ternium's score of 0.61 indicating that POSCO is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to POSCO's net margin of 1.79%. Ternium's return on equity of 4.26% beat POSCO's return on equity.

Ternium currently has a consensus price target of $47.94, suggesting a potential downside of 10.85%. Given Ternium's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Ternium is more favorable than POSCO.

Ternium pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. POSCO pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Ternium pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. POSCO pays out 37.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

POSCO has higher revenue and earnings than Ternium. Ternium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than POSCO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

12.0% of Ternium shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Ternium shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of POSCO shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ternium has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, POSCO has a beta of 1.56, meaning that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market.

Ternium presently has a consensus target price of $47.94, suggesting a potential downside of 10.85%. Gerdau has a consensus target price of $5.28, suggesting a potential upside of 11.58%. Given Gerdau's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gerdau is more favorable than Ternium.

12.0% of Ternium shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of Gerdau shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Ternium shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Gerdau shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ternium has higher revenue and earnings than Gerdau. Ternium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gerdau, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Gerdau's net margin of 3.37%. Gerdau's return on equity of 7.97% beat Ternium's return on equity.

In the previous week, Gerdau had 6 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Gerdau and 4 mentions for Ternium. Gerdau's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Ternium's score of 0.61 indicating that Gerdau is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Ternium pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Gerdau pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Ternium pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gerdau pays out 52.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Ternium has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gerdau has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Ternium's net margin of 4.37%. Commercial Metals' return on equity of 15.69% beat Ternium's return on equity.

Commercial Metals presently has a consensus price target of $81.18, indicating a potential upside of 13.38%. Ternium has a consensus price target of $47.94, indicating a potential downside of 10.85%. Given Commercial Metals' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Commercial Metals is more favorable than Ternium.

In the previous week, Commercial Metals had 5 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Commercial Metals and 4 mentions for Ternium. Commercial Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Ternium's score of 0.61 indicating that Commercial Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Commercial Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Ternium pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Commercial Metals pays out 15.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ternium pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Commercial Metals has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.52, meaning that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ternium has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

86.9% of Commercial Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.0% of Ternium shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Commercial Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Ternium shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ternium has higher revenue and earnings than Commercial Metals. Commercial Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ternium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ternium has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ternium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

12.0% of Ternium shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Ternium shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Ternium's return on equity of 4.26% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Ternium currently has a consensus price target of $47.94, suggesting a potential downside of 10.85%. Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $11.86, suggesting a potential downside of 0.42%. Given Cleveland-Cliffs' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more favorable than Ternium.

In the previous week, Ternium and Ternium both had 4 articles in the media. Cleveland-Cliffs' average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Ternium's score of 0.61 indicating that Cleveland-Cliffs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Ternium has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.09, indicating that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market.