Ternium (TX) Competitors

Ternium has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, POSCO has a beta of 1.64, indicating that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

Ternium pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. POSCO pays an annual dividend of $1.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Ternium pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. POSCO pays out 43.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

12.0% of Ternium shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Ternium shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of POSCO shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ternium had 5 more articles in the media than POSCO. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Ternium and 0 mentions for POSCO. Ternium's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat POSCO's score of 0.44 indicating that Ternium is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to POSCO's net margin of 1.79%. Ternium's return on equity of 4.26% beat POSCO's return on equity.

Ternium currently has a consensus target price of $55.72, indicating a potential downside of 5.54%. Given Ternium's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ternium is more favorable than POSCO.

POSCO has higher revenue and earnings than Ternium. Ternium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than POSCO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Gerdau has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ternium has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ternium had 3 more articles in the media than Gerdau. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Ternium and 2 mentions for Gerdau. Gerdau's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Ternium's score of 0.60 indicating that Gerdau is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Gerdau currently has a consensus price target of $5.58, indicating a potential upside of 7.52%. Ternium has a consensus price target of $55.72, indicating a potential downside of 5.54%. Given Gerdau's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gerdau is more favorable than Ternium.

1.5% of Gerdau shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.0% of Ternium shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Gerdau shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Ternium shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Gerdau's net margin of 3.37%. Gerdau's return on equity of 7.97% beat Ternium's return on equity.

Ternium has higher revenue and earnings than Gerdau. Ternium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gerdau, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Gerdau pays an annual dividend of $0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Ternium pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Gerdau pays out 65.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ternium pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Ternium's net margin of 4.37%. Commercial Metals' return on equity of 15.69% beat Ternium's return on equity.

Ternium presently has a consensus price target of $55.72, suggesting a potential downside of 5.54%. Commercial Metals has a consensus price target of $80.27, suggesting a potential upside of 23.86%. Given Commercial Metals' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Commercial Metals is more favorable than Ternium.

Ternium has higher revenue and earnings than Commercial Metals. Commercial Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ternium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

12.0% of Ternium shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.9% of Commercial Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Ternium shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Commercial Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ternium has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.53, suggesting that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Commercial Metals had 18 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Commercial Metals and 5 mentions for Ternium. Ternium's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Commercial Metals' score of 0.52 indicating that Ternium is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Ternium pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Commercial Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Ternium pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 15.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Commercial Metals has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 10 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 5 mentions for Ternium. Ternium's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 0.27 indicating that Ternium is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.0% of Ternium shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Ternium shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.09, meaning that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ternium has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Ternium has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ternium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Ternium's return on equity of 4.26% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Cleveland-Cliffs currently has a consensus target price of $12.35, suggesting a potential downside of 3.85%. Ternium has a consensus target price of $55.72, suggesting a potential downside of 5.54%. Given Cleveland-Cliffs' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more favorable than Ternium.