Gerdau (GGB) Competitors

POSCO has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gerdau has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gerdau had 2 more articles in the media than POSCO. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Gerdau and 7 mentions for POSCO. POSCO's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Gerdau's score of 0.36 indicating that POSCO is being referred to more favorably in the media.

1.5% of Gerdau shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of POSCO shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Gerdau shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gerdau has a net margin of 3.37% compared to POSCO's net margin of 1.79%. Gerdau's return on equity of 7.97% beat POSCO's return on equity.

POSCO pays an annual dividend of $1.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Gerdau pays an annual dividend of $0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. POSCO pays out 43.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gerdau pays out 65.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Gerdau has a consensus price target of $5.58, indicating a potential upside of 15.07%. Given Gerdau's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gerdau is more favorable than POSCO.

POSCO has higher revenue and earnings than Gerdau. Gerdau is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than POSCO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Gerdau has a beta of 1.49, suggesting that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ternium has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gerdau had 7 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Gerdau and 2 mentions for Ternium. Ternium's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Gerdau's score of 0.36 indicating that Ternium is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Gerdau presently has a consensus price target of $5.58, suggesting a potential upside of 15.07%. Ternium has a consensus price target of $54.50, suggesting a potential downside of 1.63%. Given Gerdau's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Gerdau is more favorable than Ternium.

Gerdau pays an annual dividend of $0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Ternium pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Gerdau pays out 65.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ternium pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

1.5% of Gerdau shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.0% of Ternium shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Gerdau shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Ternium shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ternium has higher revenue and earnings than Gerdau. Ternium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gerdau, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Gerdau's net margin of 3.37%. Gerdau's return on equity of 7.97% beat Ternium's return on equity.

Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.52, meaning that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gerdau has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gerdau had 5 more articles in the media than Commercial Metals. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Gerdau and 4 mentions for Commercial Metals. Commercial Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Gerdau's score of 0.36 indicating that Commercial Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Commercial Metals currently has a consensus target price of $81.64, suggesting a potential upside of 24.11%. Gerdau has a consensus target price of $5.58, suggesting a potential upside of 15.07%. Given Commercial Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Commercial Metals is more favorable than Gerdau.

Commercial Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Gerdau pays an annual dividend of $0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Commercial Metals pays out 15.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gerdau pays out 65.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Commercial Metals has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

86.9% of Commercial Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of Gerdau shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Commercial Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Gerdau shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gerdau has higher revenue and earnings than Commercial Metals. Commercial Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gerdau, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Gerdau's net margin of 3.37%. Commercial Metals' return on equity of 15.69% beat Gerdau's return on equity.

In the previous week, Gerdau had 2 more articles in the media than Cleveland-Cliffs. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Gerdau and 7 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Gerdau's score of 0.36 indicating that Cleveland-Cliffs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Gerdau has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.1, meaning that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

Gerdau has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gerdau, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Gerdau has a net margin of 3.37% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Gerdau's return on equity of 7.97% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Gerdau presently has a consensus target price of $5.58, indicating a potential upside of 15.07%. Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus target price of $12.25, indicating a potential upside of 0.71%. Given Gerdau's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Gerdau is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

1.5% of Gerdau shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Gerdau shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.