Gerdau (GGB) Competitors

Gerdau presently has a consensus price target of $5.58, indicating a potential upside of 11.95%. Given Gerdau's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Gerdau is more favorable than POSCO.

POSCO has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gerdau. Gerdau is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than POSCO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Gerdau and Gerdau both had 4 articles in the media. POSCO's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Gerdau's score of 0.71 indicating that POSCO is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Gerdau has a net margin of 3.37% compared to POSCO's net margin of 1.79%. Gerdau's return on equity of 7.97% beat POSCO's return on equity.

Gerdau pays an annual dividend of $0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. POSCO pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Gerdau pays out 65.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. POSCO pays out 37.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Gerdau has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, POSCO has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

1.5% of Gerdau shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Gerdau shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of POSCO shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ternium pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Gerdau pays an annual dividend of $0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Ternium pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gerdau pays out 65.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Ternium had 3 more articles in the media than Gerdau. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Ternium and 4 mentions for Gerdau. Gerdau's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Ternium's score of 0.63 indicating that Gerdau is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Gerdau's net margin of 3.37%. Gerdau's return on equity of 7.97% beat Ternium's return on equity.

Ternium has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gerdau. Ternium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gerdau, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ternium has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gerdau has a beta of 1.49, indicating that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market.

Ternium presently has a consensus target price of $54.50, indicating a potential downside of 6.07%. Gerdau has a consensus target price of $5.58, indicating a potential upside of 11.95%. Given Gerdau's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gerdau is more favorable than Ternium.

12.0% of Ternium shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of Gerdau shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Ternium shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Gerdau shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Commercial Metals had 2 more articles in the media than Gerdau. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Commercial Metals and 4 mentions for Gerdau. Commercial Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Gerdau's score of 0.71 indicating that Commercial Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Gerdau has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.52, meaning that its share price is 52% more volatile than the broader market.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Gerdau's net margin of 3.37%. Commercial Metals' return on equity of 15.69% beat Gerdau's return on equity.

Gerdau presently has a consensus price target of $5.58, indicating a potential upside of 11.95%. Commercial Metals has a consensus price target of $81.18, indicating a potential upside of 15.61%. Given Commercial Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Commercial Metals is more favorable than Gerdau.

Gerdau has higher revenue and earnings than Commercial Metals. Commercial Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gerdau, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

1.5% of Gerdau shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.9% of Commercial Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Gerdau shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Commercial Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gerdau pays an annual dividend of $0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Commercial Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Gerdau pays out 65.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 15.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Commercial Metals has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Gerdau presently has a consensus price target of $5.58, indicating a potential upside of 11.95%. Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $11.96, indicating a potential downside of 4.24%. Given Gerdau's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Gerdau is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

1.5% of Gerdau shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Gerdau shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gerdau has a beta of 1.49, indicating that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 10 more articles in the media than Gerdau. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 4 mentions for Gerdau. Cleveland-Cliffs' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Gerdau's score of 0.71 indicating that Cleveland-Cliffs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Gerdau has a net margin of 3.37% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Gerdau's return on equity of 7.97% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Gerdau has higher revenue and earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gerdau, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.