Gerdau (GGB) Competitors

Gerdau has a consensus price target of $5.58, suggesting a potential upside of 10.51%. Given Gerdau's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gerdau is more favorable than POSCO.

Gerdau has a net margin of 3.37% compared to POSCO's net margin of 1.79%. Gerdau's return on equity of 7.97% beat POSCO's return on equity.

In the previous week, Gerdau had 4 more articles in the media than POSCO. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gerdau and 0 mentions for POSCO. Gerdau's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat POSCO's score of 0.00 indicating that Gerdau is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

1.5% of Gerdau shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of POSCO shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Gerdau shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

POSCO has higher revenue and earnings than Gerdau. POSCO is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gerdau, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

POSCO pays an annual dividend of $1.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Gerdau pays an annual dividend of $0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. POSCO pays out 43.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gerdau pays out 65.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

POSCO has a beta of 1.64, suggesting that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gerdau has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

Gerdau presently has a consensus price target of $5.58, indicating a potential upside of 10.51%. Ternium has a consensus price target of $55.72, indicating a potential downside of 2.01%. Given Gerdau's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Gerdau is more favorable than Ternium.

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Gerdau's net margin of 3.37%. Gerdau's return on equity of 7.97% beat Ternium's return on equity.

In the previous week, Ternium had 2 more articles in the media than Gerdau. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Ternium and 4 mentions for Gerdau. Gerdau's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Ternium's score of 0.20 indicating that Gerdau is being referred to more favorably in the media.

1.5% of Gerdau shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.0% of Ternium shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Gerdau shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Ternium shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ternium has higher revenue and earnings than Gerdau. Ternium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gerdau, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Gerdau pays an annual dividend of $0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Ternium pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Gerdau pays out 65.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ternium pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Gerdau has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ternium has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Gerdau has a net margin of 3.37% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Gerdau's return on equity of 7.97% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 11 more articles in the media than Gerdau. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 4 mentions for Gerdau. Gerdau's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 0.27 indicating that Gerdau is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Gerdau has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gerdau, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

1.5% of Gerdau shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Gerdau shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gerdau presently has a consensus price target of $5.58, indicating a potential upside of 10.51%. Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $12.35, indicating a potential upside of 1.66%. Given Gerdau's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Gerdau is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Gerdau has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market.

Gerdau pays an annual dividend of $0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Commercial Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Gerdau pays out 65.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 15.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Commercial Metals has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Gerdau has higher revenue and earnings than Commercial Metals. Commercial Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gerdau, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Gerdau presently has a consensus price target of $5.58, indicating a potential upside of 10.51%. Commercial Metals has a consensus price target of $80.27, indicating a potential upside of 23.02%. Given Commercial Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Commercial Metals is more favorable than Gerdau.

1.5% of Gerdau shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.9% of Commercial Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Gerdau shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Commercial Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gerdau has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.53, meaning that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Commercial Metals had 29 more articles in the media than Gerdau. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Commercial Metals and 4 mentions for Gerdau. Gerdau's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Commercial Metals' score of 0.72 indicating that Gerdau is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Gerdau's net margin of 3.37%. Commercial Metals' return on equity of 15.69% beat Gerdau's return on equity.