Does the media refer more to CLF or STLD?

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 2 more articles in the media than Steel Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 12 mentions for Steel Dynamics. Steel Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of -0.01 indicating that Steel Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cleveland-Cliffs 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Steel Dynamics 5 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better valuation and earnings, CLF or NUE?

Nucor has higher revenue and earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nucor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cleveland-Cliffs $18.61B 0.34 -$1.48B -$1.62 N/A Nucor $32.49B 1.64 $1.74B $12.54 18.68

Is CLF or NUE more profitable?

Nucor has a net margin of 7.99% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Nucor's return on equity of 12.73% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cleveland-Cliffs -4.56% -13.37% -3.96% Nucor 7.99% 12.73% 8.03%

Does the media refer more to CLF or NUE?

In the previous week, Nucor had 3 more articles in the media than Cleveland-Cliffs. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Nucor and 14 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs. Nucor's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of -0.01 indicating that Nucor is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cleveland-Cliffs 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Nucor 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 6 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer CLF or PKX?

Cleveland-Cliffs presently has a consensus price target of $12.25, indicating a potential upside of 11.56%. Given Cleveland-Cliffs' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more favorable than POSCO. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Cleveland-Cliffs 2 Sell rating(s) 7 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 POSCO 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has better earnings and valuation, CLF or PKX?

POSCO has higher revenue and earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than POSCO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cleveland-Cliffs $18.61B 0.34 -$1.48B -$1.62 N/A POSCO $48.64B 0.35 $483.48M $2.64 21.34

Is CLF or PKX more profitable?

POSCO has a net margin of 1.79% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. POSCO's return on equity of 1.99% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cleveland-Cliffs -4.56% -13.37% -3.96% POSCO 1.79% 1.99% 1.18%

Does the media refer more to CLF or PKX?

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 11 more articles in the media than POSCO. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 3 mentions for POSCO. POSCO's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of -0.01 indicating that POSCO is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cleveland-Cliffs 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral POSCO 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is TX or CLF more profitable?

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Ternium's return on equity of 4.26% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ternium 4.37% 4.26% 2.92% Cleveland-Cliffs -4.56% -13.37% -3.96%

Does the media prefer TX or CLF?

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 12 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 2 mentions for Ternium. Ternium's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of -0.01 indicating that Ternium is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ternium 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cleveland-Cliffs 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) Competitors

$10.98 -0.03 (-0.28%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$11.04 +0.06 (+0.56%)

As of 07:59 PM Eastern

Compare

CLF vs. STLD, CMC, NUE, PKX, and TX

Should you buy Cleveland-Cliffs stock or one of its competitors? Cleveland-Cliffs's main competitors and comparable companies include Steel Dynamics (STLD), Commercial Metals (CMC), Nucor (NUE), POSCO (PKX), and Ternium (TX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "steel" industry.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Steel Dynamics?

Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) and Steel Dynamics (NASDAQ:STLD) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 2 more articles in the media than Steel Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 12 mentions for Steel Dynamics. Steel Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of -0.01 indicating that Steel Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cleveland-Cliffs	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Steel Dynamics	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Steel Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Steel Dynamics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.1, meaning that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

Cleveland-Cliffs presently has a consensus price target of $12.25, indicating a potential upside of 11.56%. Steel Dynamics has a consensus price target of $258.55, indicating a potential upside of 16.67%. Given Steel Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Steel Dynamics is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cleveland-Cliffs	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Steel Dynamics	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Steel Dynamics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Steel Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cleveland-Cliffs	$18.61B	0.34	-$1.48B	-$1.62	N/A
Steel Dynamics	$18.18B	1.75	$1.19B	$11.03	20.09

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Steel Dynamics' return on equity of 18.12% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cleveland-Cliffs	-4.56%	-13.37%	-3.96%
Steel Dynamics	7.83%	18.12%	9.81%

Summary

Steel Dynamics beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Commercial Metals?

Commercial Metals (NYSE:CMC) and Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Commercial Metals presently has a consensus price target of $81.64, suggesting a potential upside of 31.25%. Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $12.25, suggesting a potential upside of 11.56%. Given Commercial Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Commercial Metals is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Commercial Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Cleveland-Cliffs	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Commercial Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Commercial Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Commercial Metals	$7.80B	0.88	$84.66M	$5.31	11.71
Cleveland-Cliffs	$18.61B	0.34	-$1.48B	-$1.62	N/A

86.9% of Commercial Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Commercial Metals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.52, suggesting that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Commercial Metals' return on equity of 15.69% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Commercial Metals	6.72%	15.69%	7.65%
Cleveland-Cliffs	-4.56%	-13.37%	-3.96%

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 14 more articles in the media than Commercial Metals. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 0 mentions for Commercial Metals. Commercial Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of -0.01 indicating that Commercial Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Commercial Metals	Positive
Cleveland-Cliffs	Neutral

Summary

Commercial Metals beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Nucor?

Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) and Nucor (NYSE:NUE) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Nucor had 3 more articles in the media than Cleveland-Cliffs. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Nucor and 14 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs. Nucor's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of -0.01 indicating that Nucor is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cleveland-Cliffs	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Nucor	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	6 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.5% of Nucor shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Nucor shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Nucor has higher revenue and earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nucor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cleveland-Cliffs	$18.61B	0.34	-$1.48B	-$1.62	N/A
Nucor	$32.49B	1.64	$1.74B	$12.54	18.68

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its share price is 110% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nucor has a beta of 1.87, indicating that its share price is 87% more volatile than the broader market.

Nucor has a net margin of 7.99% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Nucor's return on equity of 12.73% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cleveland-Cliffs	-4.56%	-13.37%	-3.96%
Nucor	7.99%	12.73%	8.03%

Cleveland-Cliffs presently has a consensus target price of $12.25, indicating a potential upside of 11.56%. Nucor has a consensus target price of $276.07, indicating a potential upside of 17.88%. Given Nucor's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Nucor is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cleveland-Cliffs	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Nucor	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76

Summary

Nucor beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to POSCO?

Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) and POSCO (NYSE:PKX) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

POSCO has a net margin of 1.79% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. POSCO's return on equity of 1.99% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cleveland-Cliffs	-4.56%	-13.37%	-3.96%
POSCO	1.79%	1.99%	1.18%

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 11 more articles in the media than POSCO. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 3 mentions for POSCO. POSCO's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of -0.01 indicating that POSCO is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cleveland-Cliffs	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
POSCO	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of POSCO shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, POSCO has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

Cleveland-Cliffs presently has a consensus price target of $12.25, indicating a potential upside of 11.56%. Given Cleveland-Cliffs' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more favorable than POSCO.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cleveland-Cliffs	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
POSCO	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

POSCO has higher revenue and earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than POSCO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cleveland-Cliffs	$18.61B	0.34	-$1.48B	-$1.62	N/A
POSCO	$48.64B	0.35	$483.48M	$2.64	21.34

Summary

POSCO beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Ternium?

Ternium (NYSE:TX) and Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Ternium's return on equity of 4.26% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ternium	4.37%	4.26%	2.92%
Cleveland-Cliffs	-4.56%	-13.37%	-3.96%

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 12 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 2 mentions for Ternium. Ternium's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of -0.01 indicating that Ternium is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ternium	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cleveland-Cliffs	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Ternium presently has a consensus target price of $54.50, indicating a potential upside of 0.27%. Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus target price of $12.25, indicating a potential upside of 11.56%. Given Cleveland-Cliffs' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more favorable than Ternium.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ternium	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Cleveland-Cliffs	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Ternium has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

Ternium has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ternium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ternium	$15.61B	0.70	$425.23M	$3.56	15.27
Cleveland-Cliffs	$18.61B	0.34	-$1.48B	-$1.62	N/A

12.0% of Ternium shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Ternium shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ternium beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cleveland-Cliffs News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CLF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Cleveland-Cliffs	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$6.28B	$3.73B	$4.72B	$22.62B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.23%	4.73%	3.69%
P/E Ratio	-6.78	24.95	25.25	27.52
Price / Sales	0.34	27,583.18	16,411.59	84.06
Price / Cash	N/A	27.25	25.09	41.75
Price / Book	0.86	12.32	10.23	4.60
Net Income	-$1.48B	$127.13M	$157.97M	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	-14.58%	-2.77%	-2.63%	-1.99%
1 Month Performance	-5.43%	-4.90%	-4.70%	-6.24%
1 Year Performance	-10.30%	22.85%	19.49%	5.07%

Cleveland-Cliffs Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs	1.7609 of 5 stars	$10.98 -0.3%	$12.25 +11.6%	-14.3%	$6.28B	$18.61B	N/A	25,000
STLD Steel Dynamics	4.9328 of 5 stars	$230.39 -1.4%	$258.55 +12.2%	+59.8%	$33.02B	$18.18B	20.89	14,400	Analyst Upgrade
CMC Commercial Metals	4.9491 of 5 stars	$64.48 -1.9%	$81.64 +26.6%	+8.4%	$7.13B	$7.80B	12.14	12,690
NUE Nucor	4.8838 of 5 stars	$244.65 -1.1%	$276.07 +12.8%	+74.0%	$55.51B	$32.49B	19.51	33,000
PKX POSCO	2.7516 of 5 stars	$57.93 +1.7%	N/A	+14.2%	$17.52B	$48.64B	21.94	42,873	News Coverage

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CLF) was last updated on 9/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) Competitors

CLF vs. STLD, CMC, NUE, PKX, and TX

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Steel Dynamics?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Commercial Metals?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Nucor?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to POSCO?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Ternium?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CLF vs. The Competition

Cleveland-Cliffs Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) Competitors

CLF vs. STLD, CMC, NUE, PKX, and TX

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Steel Dynamics?

Does the media refer more to CLF or STLD?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in CLF or STLD?

Which has more volatility & risk, CLF or STLD?

Do analysts rate CLF or STLD?

Which has better earnings & valuation, CLF or STLD?

Is CLF or STLD more profitable?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Commercial Metals?

Do analysts rate CMC or CLF?

Which has better valuation and earnings, CMC or CLF?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CMC or CLF?

Which has more volatility and risk, CMC or CLF?

Is CMC or CLF more profitable?

Does the media favor CMC or CLF?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Nucor?

Does the media refer more to CLF or NUE?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CLF or NUE?

Which has better valuation and earnings, CLF or NUE?

Which has more volatility & risk, CLF or NUE?

Is CLF or NUE more profitable?

Do analysts rate CLF or NUE?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to POSCO?

Is CLF or PKX more profitable?

Does the media refer more to CLF or PKX?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in CLF or PKX?

Which has more risk & volatility, CLF or PKX?

Do analysts prefer CLF or PKX?

Which has better earnings and valuation, CLF or PKX?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Ternium?

Is TX or CLF more profitable?

Does the media prefer TX or CLF?

Do analysts recommend TX or CLF?

Which has more volatility and risk, TX or CLF?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, TX or CLF?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in TX or CLF?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CLF vs. The Competition

Cleveland-Cliffs Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools