Does the media favor CLF or STLD?

In the previous week, Steel Dynamics had 3 more articles in the media than Cleveland-Cliffs. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Steel Dynamics and 11 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs. Steel Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 0.98 indicating that Steel Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cleveland-Cliffs 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Steel Dynamics 10 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer CLF or CMC?

In the previous week, Commercial Metals had 5 more articles in the media than Cleveland-Cliffs. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Commercial Metals and 11 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs' average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Commercial Metals' score of 0.90 indicating that Cleveland-Cliffs is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cleveland-Cliffs 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Commercial Metals 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CLF or NUE?

Nucor has higher revenue and earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nucor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cleveland-Cliffs $18.61B 0.36 -$1.48B -$1.62 N/A Nucor $32.49B 1.78 $1.74B $12.54 20.35

Is CLF or NUE more profitable?

Nucor has a net margin of 7.99% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Nucor's return on equity of 12.73% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cleveland-Cliffs -4.56% -13.37% -3.96% Nucor 7.99% 12.73% 8.03%

Does the media refer more to CLF or NUE?

In the previous week, Nucor had 22 more articles in the media than Cleveland-Cliffs. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Nucor and 11 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs' average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Nucor's score of 0.73 indicating that Cleveland-Cliffs is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cleveland-Cliffs 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Nucor 16 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend CLF or PKX?

Cleveland-Cliffs presently has a consensus target price of $12.06, indicating a potential upside of 2.08%. Given Cleveland-Cliffs' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more favorable than POSCO. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Cleveland-Cliffs 2 Sell rating(s) 7 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 POSCO 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CLF or PKX?

POSCO has higher revenue and earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than POSCO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cleveland-Cliffs $18.61B 0.36 -$1.48B -$1.62 N/A POSCO $48.64B 0.38 $483.48M $2.64 23.37

Is CLF or PKX more profitable?

POSCO has a net margin of 1.79% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. POSCO's return on equity of 1.99% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cleveland-Cliffs -4.56% -13.37% -3.96% POSCO 1.79% 1.99% 1.18%

Does the media refer more to CLF or PKX?

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 7 more articles in the media than POSCO. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 4 mentions for POSCO. Cleveland-Cliffs' average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat POSCO's score of 0.29 indicating that Cleveland-Cliffs is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cleveland-Cliffs 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive POSCO 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Is CLF or TX more profitable?

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Ternium's return on equity of 4.26% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cleveland-Cliffs -4.56% -13.37% -3.96% Ternium 4.37% 4.26% 2.92%

Does the media refer more to CLF or TX?

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 2 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 9 mentions for Ternium. Cleveland-Cliffs' average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Ternium's score of 0.79 indicating that Cleveland-Cliffs is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cleveland-Cliffs 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ternium 3 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) Competitors

$11.81 -0.28 (-2.28%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$11.85 +0.03 (+0.29%)

As of 07:00 PM Eastern

Compare

CLF vs. STLD, CMC, NUE, PKX, and TX

Should you buy Cleveland-Cliffs stock or one of its competitors? Cleveland-Cliffs's main competitors and comparable companies include Steel Dynamics (STLD), Commercial Metals (CMC), Nucor (NUE), POSCO (PKX), and Ternium (TX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "steel" industry.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Steel Dynamics?

Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) and Steel Dynamics (NASDAQ:STLD) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

Steel Dynamics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Steel Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cleveland-Cliffs	$18.61B	0.36	-$1.48B	-$1.62	N/A
Steel Dynamics	$18.18B	1.87	$1.19B	$11.03	21.49

In the previous week, Steel Dynamics had 3 more articles in the media than Cleveland-Cliffs. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Steel Dynamics and 11 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs. Steel Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 0.98 indicating that Steel Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cleveland-Cliffs	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Steel Dynamics	10 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cleveland-Cliffs currently has a consensus target price of $12.06, indicating a potential upside of 2.08%. Steel Dynamics has a consensus target price of $258.45, indicating a potential upside of 9.02%. Given Steel Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Steel Dynamics is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cleveland-Cliffs	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Steel Dynamics	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its share price is 110% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Steel Dynamics' return on equity of 18.12% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cleveland-Cliffs	-4.56%	-13.37%	-3.96%
Steel Dynamics	7.83%	18.12%	9.81%

67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Steel Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Steel Dynamics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Steel Dynamics beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Commercial Metals?

Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) and Commercial Metals (NYSE:CMC) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Commercial Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Commercial Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cleveland-Cliffs	$18.61B	0.36	-$1.48B	-$1.62	N/A
Commercial Metals	$7.80B	0.95	$84.66M	$5.31	12.56

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its share price is 110% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.52, suggesting that its share price is 52% more volatile than the broader market.

Cleveland-Cliffs presently has a consensus price target of $12.06, indicating a potential upside of 2.08%. Commercial Metals has a consensus price target of $81.64, indicating a potential upside of 22.39%. Given Commercial Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Commercial Metals is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cleveland-Cliffs	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Commercial Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Commercial Metals' return on equity of 15.69% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cleveland-Cliffs	-4.56%	-13.37%	-3.96%
Commercial Metals	6.72%	15.69%	7.65%

In the previous week, Commercial Metals had 5 more articles in the media than Cleveland-Cliffs. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Commercial Metals and 11 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs' average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Commercial Metals' score of 0.90 indicating that Cleveland-Cliffs is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cleveland-Cliffs	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Commercial Metals	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.9% of Commercial Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Commercial Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Commercial Metals beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Nucor?

Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) and Nucor (NYSE:NUE) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.5% of Nucor shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Nucor shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nucor has a beta of 1.87, suggesting that its stock price is 87% more volatile than the broader market.

Nucor has a net margin of 7.99% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Nucor's return on equity of 12.73% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cleveland-Cliffs	-4.56%	-13.37%	-3.96%
Nucor	7.99%	12.73%	8.03%

In the previous week, Nucor had 22 more articles in the media than Cleveland-Cliffs. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Nucor and 11 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs' average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Nucor's score of 0.73 indicating that Cleveland-Cliffs is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cleveland-Cliffs	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Nucor	16 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cleveland-Cliffs currently has a consensus price target of $12.06, suggesting a potential upside of 2.08%. Nucor has a consensus price target of $274.38, suggesting a potential upside of 7.51%. Given Nucor's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Nucor is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cleveland-Cliffs	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Nucor	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

Nucor has higher revenue and earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nucor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cleveland-Cliffs	$18.61B	0.36	-$1.48B	-$1.62	N/A
Nucor	$32.49B	1.78	$1.74B	$12.54	20.35

Summary

Nucor beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to POSCO?

Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) and POSCO (NYSE:PKX) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 7 more articles in the media than POSCO. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 4 mentions for POSCO. Cleveland-Cliffs' average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat POSCO's score of 0.29 indicating that Cleveland-Cliffs is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cleveland-Cliffs	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
POSCO	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of POSCO shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

POSCO has a net margin of 1.79% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. POSCO's return on equity of 1.99% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cleveland-Cliffs	-4.56%	-13.37%	-3.96%
POSCO	1.79%	1.99%	1.18%

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.1, meaning that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, POSCO has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

Cleveland-Cliffs presently has a consensus target price of $12.06, indicating a potential upside of 2.08%. Given Cleveland-Cliffs' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more favorable than POSCO.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cleveland-Cliffs	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
POSCO	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

POSCO has higher revenue and earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than POSCO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cleveland-Cliffs	$18.61B	0.36	-$1.48B	-$1.62	N/A
POSCO	$48.64B	0.38	$483.48M	$2.64	23.37

Summary

POSCO beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Ternium?

Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) and Ternium (NYSE:TX) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings and media sentiment.

Ternium has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ternium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cleveland-Cliffs	$18.61B	0.36	-$1.48B	-$1.62	N/A
Ternium	$15.61B	0.74	$425.23M	$3.56	16.13

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 2 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 9 mentions for Ternium. Cleveland-Cliffs' average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Ternium's score of 0.79 indicating that Cleveland-Cliffs is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cleveland-Cliffs	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ternium	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its share price is 110% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ternium has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Ternium's return on equity of 4.26% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cleveland-Cliffs	-4.56%	-13.37%	-3.96%
Ternium	4.37%	4.26%	2.92%

67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.0% of Ternium shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Ternium shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cleveland-Cliffs presently has a consensus price target of $12.06, indicating a potential upside of 2.08%. Ternium has a consensus price target of $54.50, indicating a potential downside of 5.08%. Given Cleveland-Cliffs' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more favorable than Ternium.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cleveland-Cliffs	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Ternium	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55

Summary

Ternium beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cleveland-Cliffs News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CLF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Cleveland-Cliffs	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$6.74B	$3.91B	$4.90B	$23.14B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.16%	4.67%	3.76%
P/E Ratio	-7.29	26.62	26.37	28.48
Price / Sales	0.36	8,795.28	5,242.84	19.48
Price / Cash	N/A	29.78	27.16	34.36
Price / Book	0.92	12.81	10.61	4.70
Net Income	-$1.48B	$127.55M	$158.35M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-4.11%	-1.32%	-1.19%	-2.33%
1 Month Performance	-5.34%	10.10%	7.39%	-2.85%
1 Year Performance	3.87%	50.47%	39.75%	10.59%

Cleveland-Cliffs Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs	1.7699 of 5 stars	$11.81 -2.3%	$12.06 +2.1%	+11.7%	$6.74B	$18.61B	N/A	25,000	Analyst Forecast Gap Down
STLD Steel Dynamics	4.8919 of 5 stars	$242.06 flat	$257.27 +6.3%	+84.7%	$34.69B	$18.18B	21.95	14,400	Positive News Analyst Forecast
CMC Commercial Metals	4.9603 of 5 stars	$70.22 -0.1%	$81.18 +15.6%	+18.1%	$7.77B	$7.80B	13.22	12,690	Trending News Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
NUE Nucor	4.5025 of 5 stars	$260.98 0.0%	$272.38 +4.4%	+82.8%	$59.21B	$32.49B	20.81	33,000	Trending News Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
PKX POSCO	3.3998 of 5 stars	$62.67 -0.1%	N/A	+22.7%	$18.96B	$48.64B	23.74	42,873

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CLF) was last updated on 9/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) Competitors

CLF vs. STLD, CMC, NUE, PKX, and TX

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Steel Dynamics?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Commercial Metals?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Nucor?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to POSCO?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Ternium?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CLF vs. The Competition

Cleveland-Cliffs Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) Competitors

CLF vs. STLD, CMC, NUE, PKX, and TX

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Steel Dynamics?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CLF or STLD?

Does the media favor CLF or STLD?

Do analysts prefer CLF or STLD?

Which has more volatility & risk, CLF or STLD?

Is CLF or STLD more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in CLF or STLD?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Commercial Metals?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CLF or CMC?

Which has more volatility and risk, CLF or CMC?

Do analysts prefer CLF or CMC?

Is CLF or CMC more profitable?

Does the media prefer CLF or CMC?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in CLF or CMC?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Nucor?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CLF or NUE?

Which has more volatility & risk, CLF or NUE?

Is CLF or NUE more profitable?

Does the media refer more to CLF or NUE?

Do analysts recommend CLF or NUE?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CLF or NUE?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to POSCO?

Does the media refer more to CLF or PKX?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CLF or PKX?

Is CLF or PKX more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, CLF or PKX?

Do analysts recommend CLF or PKX?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CLF or PKX?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Ternium?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CLF or TX?

Does the media refer more to CLF or TX?

Which has more volatility & risk, CLF or TX?

Is CLF or TX more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in CLF or TX?

Do analysts rate CLF or TX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CLF vs. The Competition

Cleveland-Cliffs Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools