Does the media refer more to STLD or CLF?

In the previous week, Steel Dynamics had 1 more articles in the media than Cleveland-Cliffs. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Steel Dynamics and 12 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs. Steel Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 0.90 indicating that Steel Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Steel Dynamics 11 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cleveland-Cliffs 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer CLF or CMC?

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 8 more articles in the media than Commercial Metals. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 4 mentions for Commercial Metals. Commercial Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 0.90 indicating that Commercial Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cleveland-Cliffs 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Commercial Metals 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CLF or NUE?

Nucor has higher revenue and earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nucor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cleveland-Cliffs $18.61B 0.34 -$1.48B -$1.62 N/A Nucor $32.49B 1.69 $1.74B $12.54 19.35

Is CLF or NUE more profitable?

Nucor has a net margin of 7.99% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Nucor's return on equity of 12.73% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cleveland-Cliffs -4.56% -13.37% -3.96% Nucor 7.99% 12.73% 8.03%

Does the media prefer CLF or NUE?

In the previous week, Nucor had 21 more articles in the media than Cleveland-Cliffs. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Nucor and 12 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs. Nucor's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 0.90 indicating that Nucor is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cleveland-Cliffs 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Nucor 28 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend PKX or CLF?

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus target price of $11.86, indicating a potential upside of 5.42%. Given Cleveland-Cliffs' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more favorable than POSCO. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score POSCO 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 Cleveland-Cliffs 2 Sell rating(s) 7 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PKX or CLF?

POSCO has higher revenue and earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than POSCO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio POSCO $48.64B 0.36 $483.48M $2.64 21.66 Cleveland-Cliffs $18.61B 0.34 -$1.48B -$1.62 N/A

Is PKX or CLF more profitable?

POSCO has a net margin of 1.79% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. POSCO's return on equity of 2.00% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets POSCO 1.79% 2.00% 1.19% Cleveland-Cliffs -4.56% -13.37% -3.96%

Does the media refer more to PKX or CLF?

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 11 more articles in the media than POSCO. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 1 mentions for POSCO. POSCO's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 0.90 indicating that POSCO is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment POSCO 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cleveland-Cliffs 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is CLF or TX more profitable?

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Ternium's return on equity of 4.26% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cleveland-Cliffs -4.56% -13.37% -3.96% Ternium 4.37% 4.26% 2.92%

Does the media prefer CLF or TX?

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 10 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 2 mentions for Ternium. Ternium's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 0.90 indicating that Ternium is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cleveland-Cliffs 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ternium 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) Competitors

$11.24 +0.50 (+4.66%)

As of 03:16 PM Eastern

Compare

CLF vs. STLD, CMC, NUE, PKX, and TX

Should you buy Cleveland-Cliffs stock or one of its competitors? Cleveland-Cliffs's main competitors and comparable companies include Steel Dynamics (STLD), Commercial Metals (CMC), Nucor (NUE), POSCO (PKX), and Ternium (TX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "steel" industry.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Steel Dynamics?

Steel Dynamics (NASDAQ:STLD) and Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

Steel Dynamics currently has a consensus target price of $259.09, indicating a potential upside of 14.32%. Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus target price of $11.86, indicating a potential upside of 5.42%. Given Steel Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Steel Dynamics is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Steel Dynamics	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Cleveland-Cliffs	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Steel Dynamics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Steel Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Steel Dynamics	$18.18B	1.79	$1.19B	$11.03	20.55
Cleveland-Cliffs	$18.61B	0.34	-$1.48B	-$1.62	N/A

Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.52, meaning that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.09, meaning that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the broader market.

82.4% of Steel Dynamics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.6% of Steel Dynamics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Steel Dynamics' return on equity of 18.12% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Steel Dynamics	7.83%	18.12%	9.81%
Cleveland-Cliffs	-4.56%	-13.37%	-3.96%

In the previous week, Steel Dynamics had 1 more articles in the media than Cleveland-Cliffs. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Steel Dynamics and 12 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs. Steel Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 0.90 indicating that Steel Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Steel Dynamics	11 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cleveland-Cliffs	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Steel Dynamics beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Commercial Metals?

Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) and Commercial Metals (NYSE:CMC) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Commercial Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Commercial Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cleveland-Cliffs	$18.61B	0.34	-$1.48B	-$1.62	N/A
Commercial Metals	$7.80B	0.94	$84.66M	$5.31	12.45

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 8 more articles in the media than Commercial Metals. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 4 mentions for Commercial Metals. Commercial Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 0.90 indicating that Commercial Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cleveland-Cliffs	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Commercial Metals	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.09, meaning that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.52, meaning that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the broader market.

67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.9% of Commercial Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Commercial Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Commercial Metals' return on equity of 15.69% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cleveland-Cliffs	-4.56%	-13.37%	-3.96%
Commercial Metals	6.72%	15.69%	7.65%

Cleveland-Cliffs presently has a consensus price target of $11.86, suggesting a potential upside of 5.42%. Commercial Metals has a consensus price target of $81.18, suggesting a potential upside of 22.80%. Given Commercial Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Commercial Metals is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cleveland-Cliffs	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Commercial Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Summary

Commercial Metals beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Nucor?

Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) and Nucor (NYSE:NUE) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Nucor had 21 more articles in the media than Cleveland-Cliffs. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Nucor and 12 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs. Nucor's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 0.90 indicating that Nucor is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cleveland-Cliffs	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Nucor	28 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.5% of Nucor shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Nucor shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cleveland-Cliffs currently has a consensus price target of $11.86, suggesting a potential upside of 5.42%. Nucor has a consensus price target of $273.31, suggesting a potential upside of 12.66%. Given Nucor's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Nucor is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cleveland-Cliffs	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Nucor	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Nucor has higher revenue and earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nucor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cleveland-Cliffs	$18.61B	0.34	-$1.48B	-$1.62	N/A
Nucor	$32.49B	1.69	$1.74B	$12.54	19.35

Nucor has a net margin of 7.99% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Nucor's return on equity of 12.73% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cleveland-Cliffs	-4.56%	-13.37%	-3.96%
Nucor	7.99%	12.73%	8.03%

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nucor has a beta of 1.89, suggesting that its share price is 89% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Nucor beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to POSCO?

POSCO (NYSE:PKX) and Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

POSCO has a beta of 1.56, suggesting that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 11 more articles in the media than POSCO. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 1 mentions for POSCO. POSCO's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 0.90 indicating that POSCO is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
POSCO	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cleveland-Cliffs	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of POSCO shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

POSCO has a net margin of 1.79% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. POSCO's return on equity of 2.00% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
POSCO	1.79%	2.00%	1.19%
Cleveland-Cliffs	-4.56%	-13.37%	-3.96%

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus target price of $11.86, indicating a potential upside of 5.42%. Given Cleveland-Cliffs' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more favorable than POSCO.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
POSCO	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Cleveland-Cliffs	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

POSCO has higher revenue and earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than POSCO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
POSCO	$48.64B	0.36	$483.48M	$2.64	21.66
Cleveland-Cliffs	$18.61B	0.34	-$1.48B	-$1.62	N/A

Summary

POSCO beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Ternium?

Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) and Ternium (NYSE:TX) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Ternium has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ternium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cleveland-Cliffs	$18.61B	0.34	-$1.48B	-$1.62	N/A
Ternium	$15.61B	0.71	$425.23M	$3.56	15.57

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.09, meaning that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ternium has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Cleveland-Cliffs currently has a consensus target price of $11.86, indicating a potential upside of 5.42%. Ternium has a consensus target price of $49.50, indicating a potential downside of 10.70%. Given Cleveland-Cliffs' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more favorable than Ternium.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cleveland-Cliffs	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Ternium	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.64

67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.0% of Ternium shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Ternium shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 10 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 2 mentions for Ternium. Ternium's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 0.90 indicating that Ternium is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cleveland-Cliffs	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ternium	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Ternium has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Ternium's return on equity of 4.26% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cleveland-Cliffs	-4.56%	-13.37%	-3.96%
Ternium	4.37%	4.26%	2.92%

Summary

Ternium beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cleveland-Cliffs News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CLF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Cleveland-Cliffs	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$6.42B	$4.09B	$5.10B	$24.21B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.21%	4.71%	3.71%
P/E Ratio	-6.94	25.60	26.55	30.19
Price / Sales	0.34	8,047.83	4,787.95	23.48
Price / Cash	N/A	29.75	27.14	32.31
Price / Book	1.10	10.56	8.96	6.77
Net Income	-$1.48B	$122.18M	$154.79M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-5.54%	3.02%	2.35%	-0.75%
1 Month Performance	21.81%	12.30%	9.93%	2.22%
1 Year Performance	11.66%	59.38%	47.16%	17.88%

Cleveland-Cliffs Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs	2.4307 of 5 stars	$11.24 +4.7%	$11.86 +5.5%	+5.6%	$6.41B	$18.61B	N/A	25,000	Gap Up
STLD Steel Dynamics	4.9457 of 5 stars	$258.16 +0.9%	$259.09 +0.4%	+74.6%	$37.00B	$18.18B	23.41	14,400	Positive News Dividend Announcement Gap Up
CMC Commercial Metals	4.994 of 5 stars	$72.75 +1.6%	$81.18 +11.6%	+15.8%	$8.05B	$7.80B	13.70	12,690	Positive News
NUE Nucor	4.9417 of 5 stars	$272.73 +1.4%	$273.31 +0.2%	+67.9%	$61.88B	$32.49B	21.75	33,000	Positive News
PKX POSCO	3.2849 of 5 stars	$59.10 +0.9%	N/A	+7.1%	$17.88B	$48.64B	22.39	42,873	Analyst Downgrade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CLF) was last updated on 8/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) Competitors

CLF vs. STLD, CMC, NUE, PKX, and TX

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Steel Dynamics?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Commercial Metals?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Nucor?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to POSCO?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Ternium?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CLF vs. The Competition

Cleveland-Cliffs Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) Competitors

CLF vs. STLD, CMC, NUE, PKX, and TX

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Steel Dynamics?

Do analysts prefer STLD or CLF?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, STLD or CLF?

Which has more volatility & risk, STLD or CLF?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in STLD or CLF?

Is STLD or CLF more profitable?

Does the media refer more to STLD or CLF?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Commercial Metals?

Which has better valuation and earnings, CLF or CMC?

Does the media prefer CLF or CMC?

Which has more risk and volatility, CLF or CMC?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of CLF or CMC?

Is CLF or CMC more profitable?

Do analysts prefer CLF or CMC?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Nucor?

Does the media prefer CLF or NUE?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CLF or NUE?

Do analysts prefer CLF or NUE?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CLF or NUE?

Is CLF or NUE more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, CLF or NUE?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to POSCO?

Which has more risk and volatility, PKX or CLF?

Does the media refer more to PKX or CLF?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PKX or CLF?

Is PKX or CLF more profitable?

Do analysts recommend PKX or CLF?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PKX or CLF?

Summary

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Ternium?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CLF or TX?

Which has more volatility & risk, CLF or TX?

Do analysts recommend CLF or TX?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in CLF or TX?

Does the media prefer CLF or TX?

Is CLF or TX more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CLF vs. The Competition

Cleveland-Cliffs Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools