Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) Competitors

In the previous week, Commercial Metals had 9 more articles in the media than Cleveland-Cliffs. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Commercial Metals and 12 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs. Commercial Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of -0.28 indicating that Commercial Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

86.9% of Commercial Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Commercial Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Commercial Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Commercial Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its share price is 113% more volatile than the broader market.

Commercial Metals currently has a consensus price target of $79.45, indicating a potential upside of 26.94%. Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $11.80, indicating a potential upside of 25.88%. Given Commercial Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Commercial Metals is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -6.42%. Commercial Metals' return on equity of 15.69% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Commercial Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Cleveland-Cliffs pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Commercial Metals pays out 15.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -10.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Commercial Metals has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Cleveland-Cliffs is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Nucor has higher revenue and earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nucor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Nucor pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Cleveland-Cliffs pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Nucor pays out 22.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -10.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Nucor has increased its dividend for 52 consecutive years. Cleveland-Cliffs is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

76.5% of Nucor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Nucor shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Nucor has a net margin of 6.82% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -6.42%. Nucor's return on equity of 10.68% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

In the previous week, Nucor and Nucor both had 12 articles in the media. Nucor's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of -0.28 indicating that Nucor is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Nucor has a beta of 1.91, suggesting that its stock price is 91% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% more volatile than the broader market.

Nucor currently has a consensus price target of $266.15, indicating a potential upside of 17.10%. Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $11.80, indicating a potential upside of 25.88%. Given Cleveland-Cliffs' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more favorable than Nucor.

67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.3% of Reliance shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Reliance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cleveland-Cliffs presently has a consensus price target of $11.80, suggesting a potential upside of 25.88%. Reliance has a consensus price target of $363.83, suggesting a potential downside of 4.26%. Given Cleveland-Cliffs' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more favorable than Reliance.

Cleveland-Cliffs pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Reliance pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -10.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Reliance pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Reliance has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Cleveland-Cliffs is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Reliance has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -6.42%. Reliance's return on equity of 11.37% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its share price is 113% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Reliance has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs and Cleveland-Cliffs both had 12 articles in the media. Reliance's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of -0.28 indicating that Reliance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Reliance has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Reliance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Worthington Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Cleveland-Cliffs pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Worthington Enterprises pays out 24.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -10.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cleveland-Cliffs is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

51.6% of Worthington Enterprises shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.4% of Worthington Enterprises shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Worthington Enterprises has a net margin of 11.30% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -6.42%. Worthington Enterprises' return on equity of 16.79% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 12 more articles in the media than Worthington Enterprises. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 0 mentions for Worthington Enterprises. Worthington Enterprises' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of -0.28 indicating that Worthington Enterprises is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Worthington Enterprises has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worthington Enterprises, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Worthington Enterprises presently has a consensus price target of $65.50, suggesting a potential upside of 20.70%. Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $11.80, suggesting a potential upside of 25.88%. Given Cleveland-Cliffs' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more favorable than Worthington Enterprises.

Worthington Enterprises has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its share price is 113% more volatile than the broader market.