Go Pro

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) Competitors

Cleveland-Cliffs logo
$11.54 -0.09 (-0.75%)
Closing price 07/31/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$11.46 -0.08 (-0.72%)
As of 07/31/2026 07:55 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CLF vs. STLD, CMC, NUE, RS, and WOR

Should you buy Cleveland-Cliffs stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Cleveland-Cliffs with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Cleveland-Cliffs include Steel Dynamics (STLD), Commercial Metals (CMC), Nucor (NUE), Reliance (RS), and Worthington Enterprises (WOR). These companies are all part of the "steel" industry.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Steel Dynamics?

Steel Dynamics (NASDAQ:STLD) and Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.53, meaning that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.13, meaning that its stock price is 113% more volatile than the broader market.

Steel Dynamics currently has a consensus target price of $249.00, indicating a potential downside of 0.90%. Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus target price of $11.86, indicating a potential upside of 2.75%. Given Cleveland-Cliffs' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more favorable than Steel Dynamics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Steel Dynamics
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Cleveland-Cliffs
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Steel Dynamics' return on equity of 18.12% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Steel Dynamics7.83% 18.12% 9.81%
Cleveland-Cliffs -4.56%-13.37%-3.96%

82.4% of Steel Dynamics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.6% of Steel Dynamics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 3 more articles in the media than Steel Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 17 mentions for Steel Dynamics. Steel Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 0.92 indicating that Steel Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Steel Dynamics
12 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cleveland-Cliffs
9 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Steel Dynamics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Steel Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Steel Dynamics$18.18B1.98$1.19B$11.0322.78
Cleveland-Cliffs$18.61B0.35-$1.48B-$1.62N/A

Summary

Steel Dynamics beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Commercial Metals?

Commercial Metals (NYSE:CMC) and Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.13, meaning that its stock price is 113% more volatile than the broader market.

Commercial Metals currently has a consensus target price of $79.45, suggesting a potential upside of 15.46%. Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus target price of $11.86, suggesting a potential upside of 2.75%. Given Commercial Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Commercial Metals is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Commercial Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Cleveland-Cliffs
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 11 more articles in the media than Commercial Metals. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 9 mentions for Commercial Metals. Commercial Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 0.92 indicating that Commercial Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Commercial Metals
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cleveland-Cliffs
9 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Commercial Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Commercial Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Commercial Metals$8.85B0.86$84.66M$5.3112.96
Cleveland-Cliffs$18.61B0.35-$1.48B-$1.62N/A

86.9% of Commercial Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Commercial Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Commercial Metals' return on equity of 15.69% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Commercial Metals6.72% 15.69% 7.65%
Cleveland-Cliffs -4.56%-13.37%-3.96%

Summary

Commercial Metals beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Nucor?

Nucor (NYSE:NUE) and Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

In the previous week, Nucor had 41 more articles in the media than Cleveland-Cliffs. MarketBeat recorded 61 mentions for Nucor and 20 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Nucor's score of 0.89 indicating that Cleveland-Cliffs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Nucor
33 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
17 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cleveland-Cliffs
9 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Nucor presently has a consensus target price of $273.31, indicating a potential upside of 6.27%. Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus target price of $11.86, indicating a potential upside of 2.75%. Given Nucor's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Nucor is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nucor
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Cleveland-Cliffs
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Nucor has a net margin of 7.99% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Nucor's return on equity of 12.73% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nucor7.99% 12.73% 8.03%
Cleveland-Cliffs -4.56%-13.37%-3.96%

76.5% of Nucor shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Nucor shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Nucor has higher revenue and earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nucor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nucor$32.49B1.80$1.74B$12.5420.51
Cleveland-Cliffs$18.61B0.35-$1.48B-$1.62N/A

Nucor has a beta of 1.91, indicating that its stock price is 91% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.13, indicating that its stock price is 113% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Nucor beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Reliance?

Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) and Reliance (NYSE:RS) are related companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 3 more articles in the media than Reliance. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 17 mentions for Reliance. Reliance's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 0.92 indicating that Reliance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cleveland-Cliffs
9 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Reliance
11 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.3% of Reliance shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Reliance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.13, meaning that its stock price is 113% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Reliance has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Cleveland-Cliffs currently has a consensus target price of $11.86, suggesting a potential upside of 2.75%. Reliance has a consensus target price of $378.67, suggesting a potential downside of 6.96%. Given Cleveland-Cliffs' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more favorable than Reliance.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cleveland-Cliffs
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Reliance
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11

Reliance has a net margin of 5.65% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Reliance's return on equity of 12.51% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cleveland-Cliffs-4.56% -13.37% -3.96%
Reliance 5.65%12.51%8.47%

Reliance has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Reliance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cleveland-Cliffs$18.61B0.35-$1.48B-$1.62N/A
Reliance$14.29B1.45$739.40M$17.2023.66

Summary

Reliance beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Worthington Enterprises?

Worthington Enterprises (NYSE:WOR) and Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

51.6% of Worthington Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of Worthington Enterprises shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 8 more articles in the media than Worthington Enterprises. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 12 mentions for Worthington Enterprises. Cleveland-Cliffs' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Worthington Enterprises' score of 0.58 indicating that Cleveland-Cliffs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Worthington Enterprises
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cleveland-Cliffs
9 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Worthington Enterprises currently has a consensus price target of $65.50, suggesting a potential upside of 16.49%. Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $11.86, suggesting a potential upside of 2.75%. Given Worthington Enterprises' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Worthington Enterprises is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Worthington Enterprises
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Cleveland-Cliffs
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Worthington Enterprises has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its share price is 113% more volatile than the broader market.

Worthington Enterprises has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worthington Enterprises, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Worthington Enterprises$1.38B2.00$156.09M$3.1417.91
Cleveland-Cliffs$18.61B0.35-$1.48B-$1.62N/A

Worthington Enterprises has a net margin of 11.30% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -4.56%. Worthington Enterprises' return on equity of 16.79% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Worthington Enterprises11.30% 16.79% 9.27%
Cleveland-Cliffs -4.56%-13.37%-3.96%

Summary

Worthington Enterprises beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cleveland-Cliffs News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CLF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CLF vs. The Competition

MetricCleveland-CliffsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$6.64B$3.53B$4.64B$23.71B
Dividend YieldN/A5.28%4.75%4.20%
P/E Ratio-7.1321.2420.0431.01
Price / Sales0.357,960.214,732.8413.91
Price / CashN/A28.9526.4931.71
Price / Book1.139.648.154.62
Net Income-$1.48B$122.63M$155.11M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-3.28%-0.80%-0.60%0.35%
1 Month Performance22.73%-3.12%-2.20%-0.19%
1 Year Performance14.74%47.27%37.92%19.11%

Cleveland-Cliffs Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs
1.8068 of 5 stars
$11.54
-0.7%
$11.86
+2.7%
+9.8%$6.64B$18.61BN/A25,000
STLD
Steel Dynamics
4.628 of 5 stars
$230.49
-2.1%
$239.18
+3.8%
+97.0%$33.36B$18.18B24.6514,400
CMC
Commercial Metals
4.9663 of 5 stars
$65.44
-1.5%
$79.45
+21.4%
+32.7%$7.24B$7.80B12.3212,690
NUE
Nucor
4.7186 of 5 stars
$230.86
-2.4%
$266.31
+15.4%
+79.7%$52.58B$32.49B22.8633,000
RS
Reliance
3.8087 of 5 stars
$383.49
-3.1%
$363.50
-5.2%
+40.1%$19.58B$14.29B25.0215,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:CLF) was last updated on 8/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners