Free Trial

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) Competitors

Cleveland-Cliffs logo
$13.56 +0.27 (+1.99%)
Closing price 05/29/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$13.62 +0.06 (+0.48%)
As of 05/29/2026 07:58 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CLF vs. STLD, CMC, NUE, ATI, and CRS

Should you buy Cleveland-Cliffs stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Cleveland-Cliffs with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Cleveland-Cliffs include Steel Dynamics (STLD), Commercial Metals (CMC), Nucor (NUE), ATI (ATI), and Carpenter Technology (CRS). These companies are all part of the "steel" industry.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Steel Dynamics?

Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) and Steel Dynamics (NASDAQ:STLD) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 7.22% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -6.42%. Steel Dynamics' return on equity of 15.54% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cleveland-Cliffs-6.42% -15.48% -4.61%
Steel Dynamics 7.22%15.54%8.49%

67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Steel Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Steel Dynamics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Steel Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Steel Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cleveland-Cliffs$18.61B0.42-$1.48B-$2.34N/A
Steel Dynamics$19.01B1.98$1.19B$9.3527.82

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2, meaning that its share price is 100% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Steel Dynamics had 8 more articles in the media than Cleveland-Cliffs. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Steel Dynamics and 6 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs. Steel Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 1.08 indicating that Steel Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cleveland-Cliffs
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Steel Dynamics
12 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Cleveland-Cliffs currently has a consensus target price of $11.49, suggesting a potential downside of 15.22%. Steel Dynamics has a consensus target price of $219.36, suggesting a potential downside of 15.68%. Given Cleveland-Cliffs' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more favorable than Steel Dynamics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cleveland-Cliffs
3 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.82
Steel Dynamics
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58

Summary

Steel Dynamics beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Commercial Metals?

Commercial Metals (NYSE:CMC) and Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and media sentiment.

Commercial Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Commercial Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Commercial Metals$8.39B1.01$84.66M$4.4916.97
Cleveland-Cliffs$18.61B0.42-$1.48B-$2.34N/A

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 6.02% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -6.42%. Commercial Metals' return on equity of 13.54% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Commercial Metals6.02% 13.54% 6.98%
Cleveland-Cliffs -6.42%-15.48%-4.61%

86.9% of Commercial Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Commercial Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Commercial Metals presently has a consensus price target of $77.10, suggesting a potential upside of 1.17%. Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $11.49, suggesting a potential downside of 15.22%. Given Commercial Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Commercial Metals is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Commercial Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Cleveland-Cliffs
3 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.82

Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.49, indicating that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2, indicating that its stock price is 100% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cleveland-Cliffs had 1 more articles in the media than Commercial Metals. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs and 5 mentions for Commercial Metals. Cleveland-Cliffs' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Commercial Metals' score of 0.95 indicating that Cleveland-Cliffs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Commercial Metals
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cleveland-Cliffs
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Commercial Metals beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Nucor?

Nucor (NYSE:NUE) and Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

76.5% of Nucor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Nucor shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Nucor had 27 more articles in the media than Cleveland-Cliffs. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Nucor and 6 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs. Nucor's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 1.08 indicating that Nucor is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Nucor
21 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cleveland-Cliffs
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Nucor has higher revenue and earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nucor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nucor$34.16B1.67$1.74B$10.1024.76
Cleveland-Cliffs$18.61B0.42-$1.48B-$2.34N/A

Nucor has a beta of 1.87, indicating that its stock price is 87% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2, indicating that its stock price is 100% more volatile than the broader market.

Nucor currently has a consensus target price of $247.50, suggesting a potential downside of 1.03%. Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus target price of $11.49, suggesting a potential downside of 15.22%. Given Nucor's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Nucor is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nucor
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88
Cleveland-Cliffs
3 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.82

Nucor has a net margin of 6.82% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -6.42%. Nucor's return on equity of 10.68% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nucor6.82% 10.68% 6.74%
Cleveland-Cliffs -6.42%-15.48%-4.61%

Summary

Nucor beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to ATI?

ATI (NYSE:ATI) and Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, ATI had 3 more articles in the media than Cleveland-Cliffs. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for ATI and 6 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs. ATI's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 1.08 indicating that ATI is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ATI
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cleveland-Cliffs
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

ATI has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ATI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ATI$4.59B5.22$404.30M$3.0258.10
Cleveland-Cliffs$18.61B0.42-$1.48B-$2.34N/A

ATI has a net margin of 9.26% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -6.42%. ATI's return on equity of 26.44% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ATI9.26% 26.44% 9.72%
Cleveland-Cliffs -6.42%-15.48%-4.61%

ATI has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2, indicating that its share price is 100% more volatile than the broader market.

67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of ATI shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ATI presently has a consensus price target of $164.38, suggesting a potential downside of 6.32%. Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $11.49, suggesting a potential downside of 15.22%. Given ATI's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe ATI is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ATI
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Cleveland-Cliffs
3 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.82

Summary

ATI beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cleveland-Cliffs compare to Carpenter Technology?

Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) and Carpenter Technology (NYSE:CRS) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and risk.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2, suggesting that its share price is 100% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 8 more articles in the media than Cleveland-Cliffs. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 6 mentions for Cleveland-Cliffs. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Cleveland-Cliffs' score of 1.08 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cleveland-Cliffs
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Carpenter Technology
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Cleveland-Cliffs currently has a consensus price target of $11.49, indicating a potential downside of 15.22%. Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $441.00, indicating a potential downside of 5.82%. Given Carpenter Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Carpenter Technology is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cleveland-Cliffs
3 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.82
Carpenter Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82

Carpenter Technology has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cleveland-Cliffs. Cleveland-Cliffs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carpenter Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cleveland-Cliffs$18.61B0.42-$1.48B-$2.34N/A
Carpenter Technology$2.88B8.09$376M$9.5049.29

Carpenter Technology has a net margin of 15.82% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs' net margin of -6.42%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 25.02% beat Cleveland-Cliffs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cleveland-Cliffs-6.42% -15.48% -4.61%
Carpenter Technology 15.82%25.02%13.96%

67.7% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Carpenter Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Carpenter Technology shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Carpenter Technology beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cleveland-Cliffs News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CLF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CLF vs. The Competition

MetricCleveland-CliffsSTEEL IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$7.76B$11.59B$4.97B$22.74B
Dividend YieldN/A1.69%4.96%4.08%
P/E Ratio-5.7932.0423.5630.62
Price / Sales0.420.656,552.7015.47
Price / CashN/A12.4027.3625.14
Price / Book1.281.239.624.79
Net Income-$1.48B$257.22M$157.24M$1.07B
7 Day Performance21.18%5.67%2.41%1.14%
1 Month Performance33.09%12.56%2.30%1.26%
1 Year Performance131.71%65.68%77.13%28.06%

Cleveland-Cliffs Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs
1.5538 of 5 stars
$13.56
+2.0%
$11.49
-15.2%
+131.7%$7.76B$18.61BN/A25,000
STLD
Steel Dynamics
4.5481 of 5 stars
$228.58
-0.3%
$214.30
-6.2%
+112.1%$33.08B$18.18B24.4514,400
CMC
Commercial Metals
3.6878 of 5 stars
$70.06
-1.7%
$74.80
+6.8%
+63.4%$7.77B$7.80B15.6012,690
NUE
Nucor
4.5594 of 5 stars
$226.23
-0.3%
$245.45
+8.5%
+128.8%$51.52B$32.49B22.4033,000
ATI
ATI
3.4074 of 5 stars
$149.68
-2.9%
$164.38
+9.8%
+120.2%$20.43B$4.59B49.567,600

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:CLF) was last updated on 5/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners