Sigma Lithium (SGML) Competitors

$15.34 +0.39 (+2.61%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$15.28 -0.06 (-0.41%)

As of 04:33 PM Eastern

SGML vs. NXE, AUGO, KNF, LEU, and ERO

Should you buy Sigma Lithium stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Sigma Lithium with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Sigma Lithium include NexGen Energy (NXE), Aura Minerals (AUGO), Knife River (KNF), Centrus Energy (LEU), and Ero Copper (ERO). These companies are all part of the "non-metallic and industrial metal mining" industry.

How does Sigma Lithium compare to NexGen Energy?

Sigma Lithium (NASDAQ:SGML) and NexGen Energy (NYSE:NXE) are both non-metallic and industrial metal mining companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Sigma Lithium has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NexGen Energy has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

NexGen Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Sigma Lithium's net margin of -41.84%. NexGen Energy's return on equity of -13.11% beat Sigma Lithium's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sigma Lithium	-41.84%	-56.56%	-13.51%
NexGen Energy	N/A	-13.11%	-8.91%

In the previous week, NexGen Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Sigma Lithium. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for NexGen Energy and 3 mentions for Sigma Lithium. NexGen Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Sigma Lithium's score of 0.46 indicating that NexGen Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Sigma Lithium	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
NexGen Energy	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

64.9% of Sigma Lithium shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of NexGen Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 48.6% of Sigma Lithium shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of NexGen Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Sigma Lithium has higher revenue and earnings than NexGen Energy. Sigma Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NexGen Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sigma Lithium	$110.01M	15.53	-$50.19M	-$0.39	N/A
NexGen Energy	N/A	N/A	-$221.63M	-$0.49	N/A

Sigma Lithium currently has a consensus target price of $18.50, suggesting a potential upside of 20.60%. Given Sigma Lithium's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sigma Lithium is more favorable than NexGen Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sigma Lithium	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17
NexGen Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57

Summary

NexGen Energy beats Sigma Lithium on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sigma Lithium compare to Aura Minerals?

Sigma Lithium (NASDAQ:SGML) and Aura Minerals (NASDAQ:AUGO) are both non-metallic and industrial metal mining companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

64.9% of Sigma Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. 48.6% of Sigma Lithium shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Sigma Lithium currently has a consensus target price of $18.50, suggesting a potential upside of 20.60%. Aura Minerals has a consensus target price of $67.60, suggesting a potential downside of 9.81%. Given Sigma Lithium's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Sigma Lithium is more favorable than Aura Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sigma Lithium	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17
Aura Minerals	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Sigma Lithium has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aura Minerals. Sigma Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aura Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sigma Lithium	$110.01M	15.53	-$50.19M	-$0.39	N/A
Aura Minerals	$1.14B	5.50	-$79.34M	$1.08	69.40

In the previous week, Aura Minerals had 6 more articles in the media than Sigma Lithium. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Aura Minerals and 3 mentions for Sigma Lithium. Sigma Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Aura Minerals' score of -0.12 indicating that Sigma Lithium is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Sigma Lithium	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Aura Minerals	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Aura Minerals has a net margin of 7.80% compared to Sigma Lithium's net margin of -41.84%. Aura Minerals' return on equity of 111.96% beat Sigma Lithium's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sigma Lithium	-41.84%	-56.56%	-13.51%
Aura Minerals	7.80%	111.96%	19.71%

Summary

Aura Minerals beats Sigma Lithium on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sigma Lithium compare to Knife River?

Knife River (NYSE:KNF) and Sigma Lithium (NASDAQ:SGML) are both non-metallic and industrial metal mining companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and media sentiment.

Knife River presently has a consensus target price of $98.00, indicating a potential upside of 33.56%. Sigma Lithium has a consensus target price of $18.50, indicating a potential upside of 20.60%. Given Knife River's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Knife River is more favorable than Sigma Lithium.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Knife River	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Sigma Lithium	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17

80.1% of Knife River shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.9% of Sigma Lithium shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Knife River shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 48.6% of Sigma Lithium shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Knife River has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sigma Lithium has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Sigma Lithium had 2 more articles in the media than Knife River. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Sigma Lithium and 1 mentions for Knife River. Knife River's average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat Sigma Lithium's score of 0.46 indicating that Knife River is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Knife River	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Sigma Lithium	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Knife River has a net margin of 4.58% compared to Sigma Lithium's net margin of -41.84%. Knife River's return on equity of 9.35% beat Sigma Lithium's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Knife River	4.58%	9.35%	3.96%
Sigma Lithium	-41.84%	-56.56%	-13.51%

Knife River has higher revenue and earnings than Sigma Lithium. Sigma Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Knife River, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Knife River	$3.20B	1.30	$157.07M	$2.57	28.55
Sigma Lithium	$110.01M	15.53	-$50.19M	-$0.39	N/A

Summary

Knife River beats Sigma Lithium on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sigma Lithium compare to Centrus Energy?

Sigma Lithium (NASDAQ:SGML) and Centrus Energy (NYSE:LEU) are both non-metallic and industrial metal mining companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Centrus Energy has a net margin of 13.40% compared to Sigma Lithium's net margin of -41.84%. Centrus Energy's return on equity of 13.10% beat Sigma Lithium's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sigma Lithium	-41.84%	-56.56%	-13.51%
Centrus Energy	13.40%	13.10%	3.51%

Sigma Lithium has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Centrus Energy has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

64.9% of Sigma Lithium shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.0% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 48.6% of Sigma Lithium shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sigma Lithium currently has a consensus target price of $18.50, indicating a potential upside of 20.60%. Centrus Energy has a consensus target price of $268.18, indicating a potential upside of 58.15%. Given Centrus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Centrus Energy is more favorable than Sigma Lithium.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sigma Lithium	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17
Centrus Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57

Centrus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Sigma Lithium. Sigma Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centrus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sigma Lithium	$110.01M	15.53	-$50.19M	-$0.39	N/A
Centrus Energy	$448.70M	7.43	$77.80M	$3.02	56.15

In the previous week, Centrus Energy had 7 more articles in the media than Sigma Lithium. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Centrus Energy and 3 mentions for Sigma Lithium. Centrus Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Sigma Lithium's score of 0.46 indicating that Centrus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Sigma Lithium	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Centrus Energy	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Centrus Energy beats Sigma Lithium on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sigma Lithium compare to Ero Copper?

Ero Copper (NYSE:ERO) and Sigma Lithium (NASDAQ:SGML) are both non-metallic and industrial metal mining companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Ero Copper has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sigma Lithium has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Ero Copper presently has a consensus target price of $31.50, indicating a potential upside of 16.94%. Sigma Lithium has a consensus target price of $18.50, indicating a potential upside of 20.60%. Given Sigma Lithium's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sigma Lithium is more favorable than Ero Copper.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ero Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.53
Sigma Lithium	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17

71.3% of Ero Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.9% of Sigma Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. 48.6% of Sigma Lithium shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Sigma Lithium had 1 more articles in the media than Ero Copper. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Sigma Lithium and 2 mentions for Ero Copper. Sigma Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.06 indicating that Sigma Lithium is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ero Copper	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Sigma Lithium	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Ero Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Sigma Lithium. Sigma Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ero Copper	$785.80M	3.57	$263.72M	$2.81	9.59
Sigma Lithium	$110.01M	15.53	-$50.19M	-$0.39	N/A

Ero Copper has a net margin of 31.63% compared to Sigma Lithium's net margin of -41.84%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 29.86% beat Sigma Lithium's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ero Copper	31.63%	29.86%	14.08%
Sigma Lithium	-41.84%	-56.56%	-13.51%

Summary

Ero Copper beats Sigma Lithium on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sigma Lithium News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SGML and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SGML vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Sigma Lithium	ELEC PRODS Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$1.71B	$16.20B	$38.69B	$12.27B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.16%	3.21%	5.32%
P/E Ratio	-39.33	34.06	168.67	25.20
Price / Sales	15.53	76.27	619.56	71.01
Price / Cash	N/A	65.80	46.83	54.25
Price / Book	30.08	7.15	10.16	6.97
Net Income	-$50.19M	$391.30M	$1.06B	$335.25M
7 Day Performance	-18.53%	-4.96%	0.17%	-0.69%
1 Month Performance	-29.28%	-4.01%	3.85%	-0.95%
1 Year Performance	164.48%	51.91%	160.68%	29.70%

Sigma Lithium Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SGML Sigma Lithium	3.5531 of 5 stars	$15.34 +2.6%	$18.50 +20.6%	+149.6%	$1.71B	$110.01M	N/A	250	Earnings Report Short Interest Decrease Gap Up
NXE NexGen Energy	1.2908 of 5 stars	$12.18 -1.2%	N/A	+96.2%	$8.14B	N/A	N/A	60	Positive News Options Volume Analyst Revision Gap Down
AUGO Aura Minerals	2.0216 of 5 stars	$79.26 -5.3%	$67.60 -14.7%	N/A	$7.01B	$921.73M	73.39	1,462
KNF Knife River	3.6354 of 5 stars	$79.69 -3.3%	$98.00 +23.0%	-29.7%	$4.68B	$3.20B	31.01	5,298	Positive News
LEU Centrus Energy	3.956 of 5 stars	$192.85 -4.7%	$268.18 +39.1%	+77.6%	$3.98B	$448.70M	63.86	280	Analyst Upgrade Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:SGML) was last updated on 5/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Sigma Lithium (SGML) Competitors

SGML vs. NXE, AUGO, KNF, LEU, and ERO

How does Sigma Lithium compare to NexGen Energy?

Summary

How does Sigma Lithium compare to Aura Minerals?

Summary

How does Sigma Lithium compare to Knife River?

Summary

How does Sigma Lithium compare to Centrus Energy?

Summary

How does Sigma Lithium compare to Ero Copper?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SGML vs. The Competition

Sigma Lithium Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Sigma Lithium (SGML) Competitors

SGML vs. NXE, AUGO, KNF, LEU, and ERO

How does Sigma Lithium compare to NexGen Energy?

Which has more volatility & risk, SGML or NXE?

Is SGML or NXE more profitable?

Does the media prefer SGML or NXE?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of SGML or NXE?

Which has better earnings and valuation, SGML or NXE?

Do analysts recommend SGML or NXE?

Summary

How does Sigma Lithium compare to Aura Minerals?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in SGML or AUGO?

Do analysts recommend SGML or AUGO?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, SGML or AUGO?

Does the media prefer SGML or AUGO?

Is SGML or AUGO more profitable?

Summary

How does Sigma Lithium compare to Knife River?

Do analysts recommend KNF or SGML?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in KNF or SGML?

Which has more volatility & risk, KNF or SGML?

Does the media favor KNF or SGML?

Is KNF or SGML more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, KNF or SGML?

Summary

How does Sigma Lithium compare to Centrus Energy?

Is SGML or LEU more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, SGML or LEU?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of SGML or LEU?

Do analysts rate SGML or LEU?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, SGML or LEU?

Does the media refer more to SGML or LEU?

Summary

How does Sigma Lithium compare to Ero Copper?

Which has more risk and volatility, ERO or SGML?

Do analysts rate ERO or SGML?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in ERO or SGML?

Does the media favor ERO or SGML?

Which has better earnings and valuation, ERO or SGML?

Is ERO or SGML more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SGML vs. The Competition

Sigma Lithium Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools