Go Pro

Compass Minerals International (CMP) Competitors

Compass Minerals International logo
$25.87 +1.25 (+5.08%)
As of 08/21/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

CMP vs. NEXA, TMC, SGML, ELVR, and LAAC

Should you buy Compass Minerals International stock or one of its competitors? Compass Minerals International's main competitors and comparable companies include Nexa Resources (NEXA), TMC the metals (TMC), Sigma Lithium (SGML), Elevra Lithium (ELVR), and Lithium Americas (Argentina) (LAAC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "diversified metals & mining" industry.

How does Compass Minerals International compare to Nexa Resources?

Compass Minerals International (NYSE:CMP) and Nexa Resources (NYSE:NEXA) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Compass Minerals International presently has a consensus target price of $27.60, suggesting a potential upside of 6.69%. Nexa Resources has a consensus target price of $14.40, suggesting a potential downside of 6.43%. Given Compass Minerals International's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Compass Minerals International is more favorable than Nexa Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Compass Minerals International
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
Nexa Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86

Nexa Resources has a net margin of 8.02% compared to Compass Minerals International's net margin of 1.42%. Nexa Resources' return on equity of 20.25% beat Compass Minerals International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Compass Minerals International1.42% 12.75% 2.28%
Nexa Resources 8.02%20.25%5.28%

Compass Minerals International has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nexa Resources has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

99.8% of Compass Minerals International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Compass Minerals International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Nexa Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Compass Minerals International. Nexa Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Compass Minerals International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Compass Minerals International$1.24B0.87-$79.80M$0.4360.16
Nexa Resources$3.00B0.68$132.63M$2.097.36

In the previous week, Nexa Resources had 4 more articles in the media than Compass Minerals International. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Nexa Resources and 1 mentions for Compass Minerals International. Compass Minerals International's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Nexa Resources' score of 0.59 indicating that Compass Minerals International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Compass Minerals International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Nexa Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Compass Minerals International and Nexa Resources tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Compass Minerals International compare to TMC the metals?

TMC the metals (NASDAQ:TMC) and Compass Minerals International (NYSE:CMP) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

4.4% of TMC the metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Compass Minerals International shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.5% of TMC the metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Compass Minerals International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TMC the metals has a beta of 2.06, suggesting that its stock price is 106% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Compass Minerals International has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Compass Minerals International has a net margin of 1.42% compared to TMC the metals' net margin of 0.00%. Compass Minerals International's return on equity of 12.75% beat TMC the metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TMC the metalsN/A N/A -96.53%
Compass Minerals International 1.42%12.75%2.28%

Compass Minerals International has higher revenue and earnings than TMC the metals. TMC the metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Compass Minerals International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TMC the metalsN/AN/A-$319.84M-$0.73N/A
Compass Minerals International$1.24B0.87-$79.80M$0.4360.16

In the previous week, TMC the metals had 20 more articles in the media than Compass Minerals International. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for TMC the metals and 1 mentions for Compass Minerals International. Compass Minerals International's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat TMC the metals' score of 0.44 indicating that Compass Minerals International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TMC the metals
5 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Compass Minerals International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

TMC the metals currently has a consensus target price of $10.58, suggesting a potential upside of 120.95%. Compass Minerals International has a consensus target price of $27.60, suggesting a potential upside of 6.69%. Given TMC the metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe TMC the metals is more favorable than Compass Minerals International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TMC the metals
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Compass Minerals International
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

Summary

Compass Minerals International beats TMC the metals on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Compass Minerals International compare to Sigma Lithium?

Compass Minerals International (NYSE:CMP) and Sigma Lithium (NASDAQ:SGML) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Compass Minerals International has a net margin of 1.42% compared to Sigma Lithium's net margin of -19.36%. Compass Minerals International's return on equity of 12.75% beat Sigma Lithium's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Compass Minerals International1.42% 12.75% 2.28%
Sigma Lithium -19.36%-37.40%-7.66%

Compass Minerals International presently has a consensus price target of $27.60, indicating a potential upside of 6.69%. Sigma Lithium has a consensus price target of $18.50, indicating a potential upside of 54.55%. Given Sigma Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sigma Lithium is more favorable than Compass Minerals International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Compass Minerals International
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
Sigma Lithium
3 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Compass Minerals International has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sigma Lithium has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Sigma Lithium had 4 more articles in the media than Compass Minerals International. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Sigma Lithium and 1 mentions for Compass Minerals International. Compass Minerals International's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Sigma Lithium's score of 0.72 indicating that Compass Minerals International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Compass Minerals International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Sigma Lithium
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

99.8% of Compass Minerals International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.9% of Sigma Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Compass Minerals International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 48.6% of Sigma Lithium shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sigma Lithium has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Compass Minerals International. Sigma Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Compass Minerals International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Compass Minerals International$1.24B0.87-$79.80M$0.4360.16
Sigma Lithium$110.01M12.25-$50.19M-$0.24N/A

Summary

Compass Minerals International beats Sigma Lithium on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Compass Minerals International compare to Elevra Lithium?

Compass Minerals International (NYSE:CMP) and Elevra Lithium (NASDAQ:ELVR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Compass Minerals International has a net margin of 1.42% compared to Elevra Lithium's net margin of 0.00%. Compass Minerals International's return on equity of 12.75% beat Elevra Lithium's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Compass Minerals International1.42% 12.75% 2.28%
Elevra Lithium N/A N/A N/A

99.8% of Compass Minerals International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Compass Minerals International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Elevra Lithium had 1 more articles in the media than Compass Minerals International. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Elevra Lithium and 1 mentions for Compass Minerals International. Compass Minerals International's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Elevra Lithium's score of 0.00 indicating that Compass Minerals International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Compass Minerals International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Elevra Lithium
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Compass Minerals International currently has a consensus target price of $27.60, indicating a potential upside of 6.69%. Given Compass Minerals International's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Compass Minerals International is more favorable than Elevra Lithium.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Compass Minerals International
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
Elevra Lithium
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Compass Minerals International has higher revenue and earnings than Elevra Lithium.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Compass Minerals International$1.24B0.87-$79.80M$0.4360.16
Elevra Lithium$144.65M9.09-$190.58MN/AN/A

Summary

Compass Minerals International beats Elevra Lithium on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Compass Minerals International compare to Lithium Americas (Argentina)?

Lithium Americas (Argentina) (NYSE:LAAC) and Compass Minerals International (NYSE:CMP) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Compass Minerals International. Lithium Americas (Argentina) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Compass Minerals International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/AN/A$1.29B$7.790.88
Compass Minerals International$1.24B0.87-$79.80M$0.4360.16

Compass Minerals International has a consensus target price of $27.60, suggesting a potential upside of 6.69%. Given Compass Minerals International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Compass Minerals International is more favorable than Lithium Americas (Argentina).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas (Argentina)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Compass Minerals International
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

Compass Minerals International has a net margin of 1.42% compared to Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s net margin of 0.00%. Compass Minerals International's return on equity of 12.75% beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/A -1.37% -1.08%
Compass Minerals International 1.42%12.75%2.28%

In the previous week, Compass Minerals International had 1 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas (Argentina). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Compass Minerals International and 0 mentions for Lithium Americas (Argentina). Compass Minerals International's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Compass Minerals International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Neutral
Compass Minerals International Very Positive

49.2% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Compass Minerals International shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.8% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Compass Minerals International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Compass Minerals International has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Compass Minerals International beats Lithium Americas (Argentina) on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Compass Minerals International News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMP vs. The Competition

MetricCompass Minerals InternationalMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.09B$4.11B$5.13B$24.30B
Dividend YieldN/A5.19%4.69%3.70%
P/E Ratio60.1625.6526.6130.31
Price / Sales0.878,013.904,771.1119.95
Price / Cash12.3929.9427.3032.49
Price / Book4.1210.578.966.77
Net Income-$79.80M$122.32M$154.93M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-1.49%3.27%2.58%-0.65%
1 Month Performance-13.18%12.55%10.18%3.38%
1 Year Performance32.84%57.65%45.55%14.90%

Compass Minerals International Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMP
Compass Minerals International
2.2517 of 5 stars
$25.87
+5.1%
$27.60
+6.7%
+32.8%$1.09B$1.24B60.161,800
NEXA
Nexa Resources
4.4886 of 5 stars
$13.67
-4.9%
$14.40
+5.3%
+209.7%$1.81B$3.46B6.545,615
TMC
TMC the metals
3.3399 of 5 stars
$3.87
+2.7%
$10.58
+173.5%
-1.4%$1.68BN/AN/A30
SGML
Sigma Lithium
3.2787 of 5 stars
$11.14
-2.5%
$18.50
+66.1%
+95.6%$1.25B$110.01MN/A250
ELVR
Elevra Lithium
0.5224 of 5 stars
$60.34
-7.2%
N/AN/A$1.17B$144.65MN/A230

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:CMP) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners