Free Trial
Final Hours! Save $100 on MarketBeat All Access Before 11:59 PM
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Lock In $149 Tonight
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

SunCoke Energy (SXC) Competitors

SunCoke Energy logo
$8.40 -0.01 (-0.06%)
Closing price 05/22/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$8.36 -0.04 (-0.46%)
As of 05/22/2026 08:00 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SXC vs. AMR, CMP, GSM, SCCO, and FCX

Should you buy SunCoke Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares SunCoke Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with SunCoke Energy include Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR), Compass Minerals International (CMP), Ferroglobe (GSM), Southern Copper (SCCO), and Freeport-McMoRan (FCX).

How does SunCoke Energy compare to Alpha Metallurgical Resources?

SunCoke Energy (NYSE:SXC) and Alpha Metallurgical Resources (NYSE:AMR) are related companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

SunCoke Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Alpha Metallurgical Resources. Alpha Metallurgical Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SunCoke Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SunCoke Energy$1.84B0.39-$44.20M-$0.77N/A
Alpha Metallurgical Resources$2.13B1.05-$61.69M-$3.00N/A

SunCoke Energy currently has a consensus target price of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.21%. Alpha Metallurgical Resources has a consensus target price of $195.33, suggesting a potential upside of 11.11%. Given Alpha Metallurgical Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Alpha Metallurgical Resources is more favorable than SunCoke Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
SunCoke Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Alpha Metallurgical Resources
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

In the previous week, Alpha Metallurgical Resources had 1 more articles in the media than SunCoke Energy. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Alpha Metallurgical Resources and 3 mentions for SunCoke Energy. Alpha Metallurgical Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat SunCoke Energy's score of 0.74 indicating that Alpha Metallurgical Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
SunCoke Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Alpha Metallurgical Resources
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

SunCoke Energy has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alpha Metallurgical Resources has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

90.5% of SunCoke Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.3% of Alpha Metallurgical Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of SunCoke Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.2% of Alpha Metallurgical Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Alpha Metallurgical Resources has a net margin of -1.83% compared to SunCoke Energy's net margin of -3.55%. SunCoke Energy's return on equity of 4.47% beat Alpha Metallurgical Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SunCoke Energy-3.55% 4.47% 1.68%
Alpha Metallurgical Resources -1.83%-2.47%-1.67%

Summary

Alpha Metallurgical Resources beats SunCoke Energy on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SunCoke Energy compare to Compass Minerals International?

Compass Minerals International (NYSE:CMP) and SunCoke Energy (NYSE:SXC) are both small-cap diversified metals & mining companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Compass Minerals International has a net margin of 0.55% compared to SunCoke Energy's net margin of -3.55%. Compass Minerals International's return on equity of 8.99% beat SunCoke Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Compass Minerals International0.55% 8.99% 1.54%
SunCoke Energy -3.55%4.47%1.68%

Compass Minerals International currently has a consensus price target of $26.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.92%. SunCoke Energy has a consensus price target of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.21%. Given SunCoke Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe SunCoke Energy is more favorable than Compass Minerals International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Compass Minerals International
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
SunCoke Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

Compass Minerals International has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SunCoke Energy has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

SunCoke Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Compass Minerals International. SunCoke Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Compass Minerals International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Compass Minerals International$1.24B1.03-$79.80M$0.15203.73
SunCoke Energy$1.84B0.39-$44.20M-$0.77N/A

In the previous week, Compass Minerals International had 1 more articles in the media than SunCoke Energy. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Compass Minerals International and 3 mentions for SunCoke Energy. SunCoke Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Compass Minerals International's score of 0.27 indicating that SunCoke Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Compass Minerals International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
SunCoke Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

99.8% of Compass Minerals International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of SunCoke Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Compass Minerals International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of SunCoke Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Compass Minerals International beats SunCoke Energy on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SunCoke Energy compare to Ferroglobe?

SunCoke Energy (NYSE:SXC) and Ferroglobe (NASDAQ:GSM) are both small-cap diversified metals & mining companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

SunCoke Energy has a net margin of -3.55% compared to Ferroglobe's net margin of -8.09%. SunCoke Energy's return on equity of 4.47% beat Ferroglobe's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SunCoke Energy-3.55% 4.47% 1.68%
Ferroglobe -8.09%-5.63%-2.71%

SunCoke Energy currently has a consensus target price of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.21%. Ferroglobe has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 39.86%. Given Ferroglobe's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ferroglobe is more favorable than SunCoke Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
SunCoke Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Ferroglobe
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

90.5% of SunCoke Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.6% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of SunCoke Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

SunCoke Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Ferroglobe pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. SunCoke Energy pays out -62.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ferroglobe pays out -10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. SunCoke Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Ferroglobe has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. SunCoke Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

SunCoke Energy has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferroglobe has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

SunCoke Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Ferroglobe. SunCoke Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferroglobe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SunCoke Energy$1.84B0.39-$44.20M-$0.77N/A
Ferroglobe$1.38B0.58-$170.70M-$0.60N/A

In the previous week, SunCoke Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Ferroglobe. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for SunCoke Energy and 2 mentions for Ferroglobe. SunCoke Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Ferroglobe's score of 0.30 indicating that SunCoke Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
SunCoke Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ferroglobe
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

SunCoke Energy beats Ferroglobe on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SunCoke Energy compare to Southern Copper?

Southern Copper (NYSE:SCCO) and SunCoke Energy (NYSE:SXC) are both diversified metals & mining companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Southern Copper pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. SunCoke Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Southern Copper pays out 66.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SunCoke Energy pays out -62.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. SunCoke Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. SunCoke Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

7.9% of Southern Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of SunCoke Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Southern Copper shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of SunCoke Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Southern Copper has a net margin of 34.13% compared to SunCoke Energy's net margin of -3.55%. Southern Copper's return on equity of 45.63% beat SunCoke Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Southern Copper34.13% 45.63% 23.88%
SunCoke Energy -3.55%4.47%1.68%

Southern Copper currently has a consensus price target of $145.14, indicating a potential downside of 19.22%. SunCoke Energy has a consensus price target of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.21%. Given SunCoke Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe SunCoke Energy is more favorable than Southern Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Southern Copper
8 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.57
SunCoke Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

Southern Copper has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SunCoke Energy has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Southern Copper has higher revenue and earnings than SunCoke Energy. SunCoke Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Southern Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Southern Copper$13.42B10.97$4.33B$6.0529.70
SunCoke Energy$1.84B0.39-$44.20M-$0.77N/A

In the previous week, Southern Copper had 14 more articles in the media than SunCoke Energy. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Southern Copper and 3 mentions for SunCoke Energy. Southern Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat SunCoke Energy's score of 0.74 indicating that Southern Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Southern Copper
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
SunCoke Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Southern Copper beats SunCoke Energy on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SunCoke Energy compare to Freeport-McMoRan?

Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) and SunCoke Energy (NYSE:SXC) are both diversified metals & mining companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Freeport-McMoRan has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SunCoke Energy has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

80.8% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of SunCoke Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of SunCoke Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Freeport-McMoRan has a net margin of 10.34% compared to SunCoke Energy's net margin of -3.55%. Freeport-McMoRan's return on equity of 9.88% beat SunCoke Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Freeport-McMoRan10.34% 9.88% 5.26%
SunCoke Energy -3.55%4.47%1.68%

Freeport-McMoRan pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. SunCoke Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Freeport-McMoRan pays out 16.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SunCoke Energy pays out -62.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. SunCoke Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. SunCoke Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Freeport-McMoRan presently has a consensus target price of $65.72, indicating a potential upside of 6.14%. SunCoke Energy has a consensus target price of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.21%. Given SunCoke Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe SunCoke Energy is more favorable than Freeport-McMoRan.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Freeport-McMoRan
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87
SunCoke Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

Freeport-McMoRan has higher revenue and earnings than SunCoke Energy. SunCoke Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freeport-McMoRan, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freeport-McMoRan$25.92B3.43$2.20B$1.8832.94
SunCoke Energy$1.84B0.39-$44.20M-$0.77N/A

In the previous week, Freeport-McMoRan had 19 more articles in the media than SunCoke Energy. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Freeport-McMoRan and 3 mentions for SunCoke Energy. Freeport-McMoRan's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat SunCoke Energy's score of 0.74 indicating that Freeport-McMoRan is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Freeport-McMoRan
15 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
SunCoke Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Freeport-McMoRan beats SunCoke Energy on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get SunCoke Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SXC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SXC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SXC vs. The Competition

MetricSunCoke EnergyCOAL IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$712.32M$10.01B$10.57B$23.18B
Dividend Yield5.71%3.43%10.23%4.10%
P/E Ratio-10.9011.1721.0930.65
Price / Sales0.391.481,003.4814.66
Price / Cash3.259.0138.7425.12
Price / Book1.171.434.634.74
Net Income-$44.20M$618.93M$4.24B$1.07B
7 Day Performance8.25%-0.87%-0.28%1.45%
1 Month Performance28.46%-2.31%2.27%1.58%
1 Year Performance-0.06%24.94%54.40%28.44%

SunCoke Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SXC
SunCoke Energy
2.425 of 5 stars
$8.40
-0.1%
$9.00
+7.2%
-0.1%$712.32M$1.84BN/A2,477
AMR
Alpha Metallurgical Resources
4.0739 of 5 stars
$176.52
-3.2%
$195.33
+10.7%
+51.0%$2.25B$2.13BN/A3,960
CMP
Compass Minerals International
2.7761 of 5 stars
$28.15
-2.8%
$26.00
-7.6%
+59.1%$1.18B$1.24B187.651,800
GSM
Ferroglobe
4.2963 of 5 stars
$3.84
-3.0%
$6.00
+56.3%
+12.0%$716.64M$1.38BN/A2,920
SCCO
Southern Copper
2.4287 of 5 stars
$169.02
-1.7%
$144.43
-14.6%
+96.0%$138.45B$13.42B27.9416,617

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:SXC) was last updated on 5/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners