Ferroglobe (GSM) Competitors

In the previous week, SunCoke Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Ferroglobe. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for SunCoke Energy and 2 mentions for Ferroglobe. SunCoke Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Ferroglobe's score of 0.30 indicating that SunCoke Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

SunCoke Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Ferroglobe pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. SunCoke Energy pays out -62.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ferroglobe pays out -10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. SunCoke Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Ferroglobe has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. SunCoke Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

SunCoke Energy has a net margin of -3.55% compared to Ferroglobe's net margin of -8.09%. SunCoke Energy's return on equity of 4.47% beat Ferroglobe's return on equity.

90.5% of SunCoke Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.6% of Ferroglobe shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of SunCoke Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

SunCoke Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Ferroglobe. SunCoke Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferroglobe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

SunCoke Energy has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferroglobe has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

SunCoke Energy currently has a consensus target price of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.21%. Ferroglobe has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 39.86%. Given Ferroglobe's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ferroglobe is more favorable than SunCoke Energy.

Southern Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Ferroglobe. Ferroglobe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Southern Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Southern Copper has a net margin of 34.13% compared to Ferroglobe's net margin of -8.09%. Southern Copper's return on equity of 45.63% beat Ferroglobe's return on equity.

Southern Copper presently has a consensus price target of $145.14, suggesting a potential downside of 19.22%. Ferroglobe has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 39.86%. Given Ferroglobe's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ferroglobe is more favorable than Southern Copper.

7.9% of Southern Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.6% of Ferroglobe shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Southern Copper shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Southern Copper pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Ferroglobe pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Southern Copper pays out 66.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ferroglobe pays out -10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ferroglobe has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Southern Copper has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferroglobe has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Southern Copper had 15 more articles in the media than Ferroglobe. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Southern Copper and 2 mentions for Ferroglobe. Southern Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Ferroglobe's score of 0.30 indicating that Southern Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Ferroglobe pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Freeport-McMoRan pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Ferroglobe pays out -10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Freeport-McMoRan pays out 16.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ferroglobe has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Ferroglobe is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

89.6% of Ferroglobe shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.8% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are held by institutional investors. 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Freeport-McMoRan had 20 more articles in the media than Ferroglobe. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Freeport-McMoRan and 2 mentions for Ferroglobe. Freeport-McMoRan's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Ferroglobe's score of 0.30 indicating that Freeport-McMoRan is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Freeport-McMoRan has higher revenue and earnings than Ferroglobe. Ferroglobe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freeport-McMoRan, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ferroglobe presently has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 39.86%. Freeport-McMoRan has a consensus price target of $65.72, suggesting a potential upside of 6.14%. Given Ferroglobe's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Ferroglobe is more favorable than Freeport-McMoRan.

Ferroglobe has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Freeport-McMoRan has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

Freeport-McMoRan has a net margin of 10.34% compared to Ferroglobe's net margin of -8.09%. Freeport-McMoRan's return on equity of 9.88% beat Ferroglobe's return on equity.

89.6% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.6% of Materion shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Materion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ferroglobe presently has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 39.86%. Materion has a consensus target price of $223.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.49%. Given Ferroglobe's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Ferroglobe is more favorable than Materion.

In the previous week, Materion had 4 more articles in the media than Ferroglobe. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Materion and 2 mentions for Ferroglobe. Materion's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Ferroglobe's score of 0.30 indicating that Materion is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Ferroglobe has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Materion has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

Ferroglobe pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Materion pays an annual dividend of $0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Ferroglobe pays out -10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Materion pays out 15.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ferroglobe has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Materion has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Ferroglobe is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Materion has a net margin of 3.99% compared to Ferroglobe's net margin of -8.09%. Materion's return on equity of 12.45% beat Ferroglobe's return on equity.

Materion has higher revenue and earnings than Ferroglobe. Ferroglobe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Materion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.