Ferroglobe (GSM) Competitors

90.5% of SunCoke Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.6% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of SunCoke Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, SunCoke Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Ferroglobe. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for SunCoke Energy and 2 mentions for Ferroglobe. Ferroglobe's average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat SunCoke Energy's score of 1.14 indicating that Ferroglobe is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

SunCoke Energy has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferroglobe has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

SunCoke Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Ferroglobe pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. SunCoke Energy pays out -62.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ferroglobe pays out -10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. SunCoke Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Ferroglobe has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. SunCoke Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

SunCoke Energy has a net margin of -3.55% compared to Ferroglobe's net margin of -8.09%. SunCoke Energy's return on equity of 4.47% beat Ferroglobe's return on equity.

SunCoke Energy presently has a consensus price target of $9.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.91%. Ferroglobe has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 46.70%. Given Ferroglobe's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ferroglobe is more favorable than SunCoke Energy.

SunCoke Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Ferroglobe. SunCoke Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferroglobe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ferroglobe has a beta of 1, suggesting that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Southern Copper has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Southern Copper has a net margin of 34.13% compared to Ferroglobe's net margin of -8.09%. Southern Copper's return on equity of 45.63% beat Ferroglobe's return on equity.

Ferroglobe pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Southern Copper pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Ferroglobe pays out -10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Southern Copper pays out 66.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ferroglobe has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Ferroglobe currently has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 46.70%. Southern Copper has a consensus target price of $145.14, suggesting a potential downside of 23.50%. Given Ferroglobe's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Ferroglobe is more favorable than Southern Copper.

89.6% of Ferroglobe shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.9% of Southern Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Southern Copper shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Southern Copper had 9 more articles in the media than Ferroglobe. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Southern Copper and 2 mentions for Ferroglobe. Ferroglobe's average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat Southern Copper's score of 1.07 indicating that Ferroglobe is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Southern Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Ferroglobe. Ferroglobe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Southern Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Freeport-McMoRan pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Ferroglobe pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Freeport-McMoRan pays out 16.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ferroglobe pays out -10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ferroglobe has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Ferroglobe is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Freeport-McMoRan had 17 more articles in the media than Ferroglobe. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Freeport-McMoRan and 2 mentions for Ferroglobe. Ferroglobe's average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat Freeport-McMoRan's score of 0.72 indicating that Ferroglobe is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Freeport-McMoRan has a net margin of 10.34% compared to Ferroglobe's net margin of -8.09%. Freeport-McMoRan's return on equity of 9.88% beat Ferroglobe's return on equity.

Freeport-McMoRan presently has a consensus price target of $66.86, suggesting a potential downside of 2.08%. Ferroglobe has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 46.70%. Given Ferroglobe's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ferroglobe is more favorable than Freeport-McMoRan.

Freeport-McMoRan has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferroglobe has a beta of 1, suggesting that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

80.8% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.6% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Freeport-McMoRan has higher revenue and earnings than Ferroglobe. Ferroglobe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freeport-McMoRan, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Materion has a net margin of 3.99% compared to Ferroglobe's net margin of -8.09%. Materion's return on equity of 12.45% beat Ferroglobe's return on equity.

Ferroglobe pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Materion pays an annual dividend of $0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Ferroglobe pays out -10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Materion pays out 15.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ferroglobe has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Materion has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Ferroglobe is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Ferroglobe has a beta of 1, indicating that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Materion has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ferroglobe had 1 more articles in the media than Materion. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ferroglobe and 1 mentions for Materion. Ferroglobe's average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat Materion's score of 1.27 indicating that Ferroglobe is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Materion has higher revenue and earnings than Ferroglobe. Ferroglobe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Materion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ferroglobe currently has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 46.70%. Materion has a consensus price target of $237.00, suggesting a potential downside of 4.21%. Given Ferroglobe's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Ferroglobe is more favorable than Materion.

89.6% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.6% of Materion shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Materion shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.