Ferroglobe (GSM) Competitors

Nexa Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Ferroglobe. Ferroglobe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nexa Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

89.6% of Ferroglobe shares are held by institutional investors. 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ferroglobe had 1 more articles in the media than Nexa Resources. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Ferroglobe and 5 mentions for Nexa Resources. Ferroglobe's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Nexa Resources' score of 0.65 indicating that Ferroglobe is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Nexa Resources has a net margin of 8.02% compared to Ferroglobe's net margin of -2.96%. Nexa Resources' return on equity of 20.25% beat Ferroglobe's return on equity.

Ferroglobe currently has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 28.48%. Nexa Resources has a consensus price target of $14.60, indicating a potential upside of 5.72%. Given Ferroglobe's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ferroglobe is more favorable than Nexa Resources.

Ferroglobe has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Nexa Resources has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Ferroglobe pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Nexa Resources pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Ferroglobe pays out -27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nexa Resources pays out 4.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ferroglobe has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Ferroglobe is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Ferroglobe has a net margin of -2.96% compared to Sigma Lithium's net margin of -19.36%. Ferroglobe's return on equity of -3.73% beat Sigma Lithium's return on equity.

Sigma Lithium has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ferroglobe. Sigma Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferroglobe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Sigma Lithium had 1 more articles in the media than Ferroglobe. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Sigma Lithium and 6 mentions for Ferroglobe. Sigma Lithium's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Ferroglobe's score of 0.69 indicating that Sigma Lithium is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Ferroglobe has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Sigma Lithium has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Ferroglobe currently has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 28.48%. Sigma Lithium has a consensus price target of $18.50, indicating a potential upside of 49.31%. Given Sigma Lithium's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sigma Lithium is more favorable than Ferroglobe.

89.6% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.9% of Sigma Lithium shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 48.6% of Sigma Lithium shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ferroglobe had 3 more articles in the media than Critical Metals. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Ferroglobe and 3 mentions for Critical Metals. Ferroglobe's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Critical Metals' score of 0.58 indicating that Ferroglobe is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Critical Metals has a beta of 1.93, indicating that its stock price is 93% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferroglobe has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

Critical Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ferroglobe.

Critical Metals presently has a consensus target price of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 147.25%. Ferroglobe has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 28.48%. Given Critical Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Critical Metals is more favorable than Ferroglobe.

Critical Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ferroglobe's net margin of -2.96%. Critical Metals' return on equity of 0.00% beat Ferroglobe's return on equity.

86.4% of Critical Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.6% of Ferroglobe shares are held by institutional investors. 65.7% of Critical Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Elevra Lithium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ferroglobe's net margin of -2.96%. Elevra Lithium's return on equity of 0.00% beat Ferroglobe's return on equity.

89.6% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ferroglobe has higher revenue and earnings than Elevra Lithium.

In the previous week, Ferroglobe had 4 more articles in the media than Elevra Lithium. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Ferroglobe and 2 mentions for Elevra Lithium. Elevra Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Ferroglobe's score of 0.69 indicating that Elevra Lithium is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Ferroglobe currently has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 28.48%. Given Ferroglobe's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Ferroglobe is more favorable than Elevra Lithium.