GSM vs. CRML, LAAC, LAC, MTAL, TMC, HBM, MP, MTUS, MATV, and SLCA
Should you be buying Ferroglobe stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Ferroglobe include Critical Metals (CRML), Lithium Americas (Argentina) (LAAC), Lithium Americas (LAC), Metals Acquisition (MTAL), TMC the metals (TMC), Hudbay Minerals (HBM), MP Materials (MP), Metallus (MTUS), Mativ (MATV), and U.S. Silica (SLCA). These companies are all part of the "basic materials" sector.
Ferroglobe (NASDAQ:GSM) and Critical Metals (NASDAQ:CRML) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, earnings, profitability, community ranking, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.
Ferroglobe received 570 more outperform votes than Critical Metals when rated by MarketBeat users.
Ferroglobe has higher revenue and earnings than Critical Metals.
In the previous week, Critical Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Ferroglobe. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Critical Metals and 4 mentions for Ferroglobe. Ferroglobe's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Critical Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Ferroglobe is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Ferroglobe has a beta of 2.01, meaning that its stock price is 101% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Critical Metals has a beta of 0.07, meaning that its stock price is 93% less volatile than the S&P 500.
89.6% of Ferroglobe shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.4% of Critical Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 65.7% of Critical Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Ferroglobe has a net margin of 5.29% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Ferroglobe's return on equity of 16.74% beat Critical Metals' return on equity.
Summary
Ferroglobe beats Critical Metals on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Ferroglobe News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GSM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GSM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip ChartThis chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
Ferroglobe Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools