Ferroglobe Competitors

Neenah (NYSE:NP) and Ferroglobe (NASDAQ:GSM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Neenah and Ferroglobe's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Neenah has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ferroglobe.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Neenah and Ferroglobe, as reported by MarketBeat.

Neenah currently has a consensus price target of $58.50, indicating a potential upside of 21.88%. Given Neenah's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Neenah is more favorable than Ferroglobe.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

90.0% of Neenah shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Neenah shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Neenah and Ferroglobe's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Neenah has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferroglobe has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its share price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Neenah beats Ferroglobe on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Westlake Chemical Partners (NYSE:WLKP) and Ferroglobe (NASDAQ:GSM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Westlake Chemical Partners and Ferroglobe's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Westlake Chemical Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ferroglobe.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Westlake Chemical Partners and Ferroglobe, as reported by MarketBeat.

Westlake Chemical Partners currently has a consensus price target of $22.75, indicating a potential upside of 3.17%. Given Westlake Chemical Partners' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Westlake Chemical Partners is more favorable than Ferroglobe.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

42.4% of Westlake Chemical Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Westlake Chemical Partners and Ferroglobe's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Westlake Chemical Partners has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferroglobe has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its share price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Westlake Chemical Partners beats Ferroglobe on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Andersons (NASDAQ:ANDE) and Ferroglobe (NASDAQ:GSM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares The Andersons and Ferroglobe's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

The Andersons has higher revenue and earnings than Ferroglobe.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for The Andersons and Ferroglobe, as reported by MarketBeat.

The Andersons currently has a consensus price target of $24.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.54%. Given The Andersons' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe The Andersons is more favorable than Ferroglobe.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

67.8% of The Andersons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.1% of The Andersons shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares The Andersons and Ferroglobe's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

The Andersons has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferroglobe has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its share price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

The Andersons beats Ferroglobe on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Schnitzer Steel Industries (NASDAQ:SCHN) and Ferroglobe (NASDAQ:GSM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Risk and Volatility

Schnitzer Steel Industries has a beta of 1.42, indicating that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferroglobe has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its share price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Schnitzer Steel Industries and Ferroglobe, as reported by MarketBeat.

Schnitzer Steel Industries currently has a consensus price target of $28.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.62%. Given Schnitzer Steel Industries' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Schnitzer Steel Industries is more favorable than Ferroglobe.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Schnitzer Steel Industries and Ferroglobe's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Schnitzer Steel Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Ferroglobe.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

82.0% of Schnitzer Steel Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.0% of Schnitzer Steel Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Schnitzer Steel Industries and Ferroglobe's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Schnitzer Steel Industries beats Ferroglobe on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ferroglobe (NASDAQ:GSM) and Maverix Metals (NYSE:MMX) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

Ferroglobe has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its share price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Maverix Metals has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Ferroglobe and Maverix Metals, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Maverix Metals has a consensus target price of $6.9625, indicating a potential upside of 37.06%. Given Maverix Metals' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Maverix Metals is more favorable than Ferroglobe.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ferroglobe and Maverix Metals' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Maverix Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ferroglobe.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

24.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.1% of Maverix Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Ferroglobe and Maverix Metals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Maverix Metals beats Ferroglobe on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ferroglobe (NASDAQ:GSM) and DRDGOLD (NYSE:DRD) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

Ferroglobe has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its share price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, DRDGOLD has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Ferroglobe and DRDGOLD, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

DRDGOLD has a consensus target price of $18.50, indicating a potential upside of 83.53%. Given DRDGOLD's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe DRDGOLD is more favorable than Ferroglobe.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ferroglobe and DRDGOLD's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

DRDGOLD has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ferroglobe.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

24.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.9% of DRDGOLD shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of DRDGOLD shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Ferroglobe and DRDGOLD's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

DRDGOLD beats Ferroglobe on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.