Ferroglobe (GSM) Competitors

89.6% of Ferroglobe shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.4% of SunCoke Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of SunCoke Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ferroglobe currently has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.52%. SunCoke Energy has a consensus target price of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 26.89%. Given SunCoke Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe SunCoke Energy is more favorable than Ferroglobe.

SunCoke Energy has a net margin of -3.55% compared to Ferroglobe's net margin of -12.78%. SunCoke Energy's return on equity of 4.47% beat Ferroglobe's return on equity.

SunCoke Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Ferroglobe. SunCoke Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferroglobe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ferroglobe pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. SunCoke Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Ferroglobe pays out -6.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SunCoke Energy pays out -62.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ferroglobe has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and SunCoke Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. SunCoke Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, SunCoke Energy had 15 more articles in the media than Ferroglobe. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for SunCoke Energy and 0 mentions for Ferroglobe. SunCoke Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat Ferroglobe's score of -0.33 indicating that SunCoke Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Ferroglobe has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SunCoke Energy has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Ferroglobe has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Southern Copper has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its share price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Ferroglobe currently has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.52%. Southern Copper has a consensus target price of $144.25, suggesting a potential downside of 15.67%. Given Ferroglobe's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Ferroglobe is more favorable than Southern Copper.

Ferroglobe pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Southern Copper pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Ferroglobe pays out -6.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Southern Copper pays out 66.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ferroglobe has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Southern Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Ferroglobe. Ferroglobe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Southern Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Southern Copper has a net margin of 34.13% compared to Ferroglobe's net margin of -12.78%. Southern Copper's return on equity of 45.63% beat Ferroglobe's return on equity.

89.6% of Ferroglobe shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.9% of Southern Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Southern Copper shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Southern Copper had 11 more articles in the media than Ferroglobe. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Southern Copper and 0 mentions for Ferroglobe. Southern Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Ferroglobe's score of -0.33 indicating that Southern Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Freeport-McMoRan has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferroglobe has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Freeport-McMoRan presently has a consensus target price of $65.14, indicating a potential upside of 12.87%. Ferroglobe has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 25.52%. Given Ferroglobe's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ferroglobe is more favorable than Freeport-McMoRan.

Freeport-McMoRan pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Ferroglobe pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Freeport-McMoRan pays out 16.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ferroglobe pays out -6.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ferroglobe has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Ferroglobe is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Freeport-McMoRan has higher revenue and earnings than Ferroglobe. Ferroglobe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freeport-McMoRan, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Freeport-McMoRan has a net margin of 10.34% compared to Ferroglobe's net margin of -12.78%. Freeport-McMoRan's return on equity of 9.88% beat Ferroglobe's return on equity.

80.8% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.6% of Ferroglobe shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Freeport-McMoRan had 40 more articles in the media than Ferroglobe. MarketBeat recorded 40 mentions for Freeport-McMoRan and 0 mentions for Ferroglobe. Freeport-McMoRan's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Ferroglobe's score of -0.33 indicating that Freeport-McMoRan is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Materion has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferroglobe has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Materion has higher revenue and earnings than Ferroglobe. Ferroglobe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Materion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Materion presently has a consensus target price of $185.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.09%. Ferroglobe has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 25.52%. Given Ferroglobe's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ferroglobe is more favorable than Materion.

Materion has a net margin of 3.99% compared to Ferroglobe's net margin of -12.78%. Materion's return on equity of 12.45% beat Ferroglobe's return on equity.

In the previous week, Materion had 16 more articles in the media than Ferroglobe. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Materion and 0 mentions for Ferroglobe. Materion's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Ferroglobe's score of -0.33 indicating that Materion is being referred to more favorably in the media.

93.6% of Materion shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.6% of Ferroglobe shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Materion shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Materion pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Ferroglobe pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Materion pays out 15.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ferroglobe pays out -6.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Materion has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Ferroglobe has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Ferroglobe is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.