S&P 500   3,629.65 (-0.16%)
DOW   29,872.47 (-0.58%)
S&P 500   3,629.65 (-0.16%)
DOW   29,872.47 (-0.58%)
S&P 500   3,629.65 (-0.16%)
DOW   29,872.47 (-0.58%)
S&P 500   3,629.65 (-0.16%)
DOW   29,872.47 (-0.58%)
Log in
NASDAQ:GSM

Ferroglobe Competitors

$1.27
+0.13 (+11.40 %)
(As of 11/25/2020 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$1.12
Now: $1.27
$1.44
50-Day Range
$0.61
MA: $0.70
$1.39
52-Week Range
$0.35
Now: $1.27
$1.82
Volume2.97 million shs
Average Volume810,557 shs
Market Capitalization$214.80 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.1

Competitors

Ferroglobe (NASDAQ:GSM) Vs. NP, WLKP, ANDE, SCHN, MMX, and DRD

Should you be buying GSM stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "basic materials" are considered alternatives and competitors to Ferroglobe, including Neenah (NP), Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP), The Andersons (ANDE), Schnitzer Steel Industries (SCHN), Maverix Metals (MMX), and DRDGOLD (DRD).

Neenah (NYSE:NP) and Ferroglobe (NASDAQ:GSM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Neenah and Ferroglobe's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Neenah$938.50 million0.86$55.40 million$3.4713.83
Ferroglobe$1.60 billion0.13$-282,680,000.00N/AN/A

Neenah has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ferroglobe.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Neenah and Ferroglobe, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Neenah00203.00
Ferroglobe0000N/A

Neenah currently has a consensus price target of $58.50, indicating a potential upside of 21.88%. Given Neenah's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Neenah is more favorable than Ferroglobe.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

90.0% of Neenah shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Neenah shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Neenah and Ferroglobe's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Neenah-1.28%10.85%4.79%
Ferroglobe-21.04%-20.56%-7.07%

Risk and Volatility

Neenah has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferroglobe has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its share price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Neenah beats Ferroglobe on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Westlake Chemical Partners (NYSE:WLKP) and Ferroglobe (NASDAQ:GSM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Westlake Chemical Partners and Ferroglobe's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Westlake Chemical Partners$1.09 billion0.71$60.98 million$1.7712.46
Ferroglobe$1.60 billion0.13$-282,680,000.00N/AN/A

Westlake Chemical Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ferroglobe.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Westlake Chemical Partners and Ferroglobe, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Westlake Chemical Partners02202.50
Ferroglobe0000N/A

Westlake Chemical Partners currently has a consensus price target of $22.75, indicating a potential upside of 3.17%. Given Westlake Chemical Partners' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Westlake Chemical Partners is more favorable than Ferroglobe.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

42.4% of Westlake Chemical Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Westlake Chemical Partners and Ferroglobe's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Westlake Chemical Partners6.41%6.83%4.68%
Ferroglobe-21.04%-20.56%-7.07%

Risk and Volatility

Westlake Chemical Partners has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferroglobe has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its share price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Westlake Chemical Partners beats Ferroglobe on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Andersons (NASDAQ:ANDE) and Ferroglobe (NASDAQ:GSM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares The Andersons and Ferroglobe's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Andersons$8.17 billion0.09$18.31 million$1.3017.83
Ferroglobe$1.60 billion0.13$-282,680,000.00N/AN/A

The Andersons has higher revenue and earnings than Ferroglobe.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for The Andersons and Ferroglobe, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Andersons01302.75
Ferroglobe0000N/A

The Andersons currently has a consensus price target of $24.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.54%. Given The Andersons' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe The Andersons is more favorable than Ferroglobe.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

67.8% of The Andersons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.1% of The Andersons shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares The Andersons and Ferroglobe's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Andersons-0.02%0.17%0.05%
Ferroglobe-21.04%-20.56%-7.07%

Risk and Volatility

The Andersons has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferroglobe has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its share price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

The Andersons beats Ferroglobe on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Schnitzer Steel Industries (NASDAQ:SCHN) and Ferroglobe (NASDAQ:GSM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Risk and Volatility

Schnitzer Steel Industries has a beta of 1.42, indicating that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferroglobe has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its share price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Schnitzer Steel Industries and Ferroglobe, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Schnitzer Steel Industries00103.00
Ferroglobe0000N/A

Schnitzer Steel Industries currently has a consensus price target of $28.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.62%. Given Schnitzer Steel Industries' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Schnitzer Steel Industries is more favorable than Ferroglobe.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Schnitzer Steel Industries and Ferroglobe's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schnitzer Steel Industries$2.13 billion0.34$56.35 million$2.1612.27
Ferroglobe$1.60 billion0.13$-282,680,000.00N/AN/A

Schnitzer Steel Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Ferroglobe.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

82.0% of Schnitzer Steel Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.0% of Schnitzer Steel Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Schnitzer Steel Industries and Ferroglobe's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Schnitzer Steel Industries0.19%2.52%1.39%
Ferroglobe-21.04%-20.56%-7.07%

Summary

Schnitzer Steel Industries beats Ferroglobe on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ferroglobe (NASDAQ:GSM) and Maverix Metals (NYSE:MMX) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

Ferroglobe has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its share price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Maverix Metals has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Ferroglobe and Maverix Metals, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ferroglobe0000N/A
Maverix Metals02402.67

Maverix Metals has a consensus target price of $6.9625, indicating a potential upside of 37.06%. Given Maverix Metals' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Maverix Metals is more favorable than Ferroglobe.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ferroglobe and Maverix Metals' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ferroglobe$1.60 billion0.13$-282,680,000.00N/AN/A
Maverix Metals$33.24 million21.42$-7,670,000.00$0.0684.67

Maverix Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ferroglobe.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

24.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.1% of Maverix Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Ferroglobe and Maverix Metals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ferroglobe-21.04%-20.56%-7.07%
Maverix Metals-12.99%3.74%2.89%

Summary

Maverix Metals beats Ferroglobe on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ferroglobe (NASDAQ:GSM) and DRDGOLD (NYSE:DRD) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

Ferroglobe has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its share price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, DRDGOLD has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Ferroglobe and DRDGOLD, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ferroglobe0000N/A
DRDGOLD00103.00

DRDGOLD has a consensus target price of $18.50, indicating a potential upside of 83.53%. Given DRDGOLD's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe DRDGOLD is more favorable than Ferroglobe.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ferroglobe and DRDGOLD's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ferroglobe$1.60 billion0.13$-282,680,000.00N/AN/A
DRDGOLD$269.51 million2.57$40.89 million$0.5219.38

DRDGOLD has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ferroglobe.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

24.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.9% of DRDGOLD shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of DRDGOLD shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Ferroglobe and DRDGOLD's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ferroglobe-21.04%-20.56%-7.07%
DRDGOLDN/AN/AN/A

Summary

DRDGOLD beats Ferroglobe on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.


Ferroglobe Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Neenah logo
NP
Neenah
2.1$48.00+0.2%$806.50 million$938.50 million-76.19
Westlake Chemical Partners logo
WLKP
Westlake Chemical Partners
2.3$22.05+4.9%$776.03 million$1.09 billion11.98
The Andersons logo
ANDE
The Andersons
1.8$23.18+0.0%$764.43 million$8.17 billion-331.14
Schnitzer Steel Industries logo
SCHN
Schnitzer Steel Industries
1.9$26.51+2.7%$718.63 million$2.13 billion241.02
MMX
Maverix Metals
1.8$5.08+2.4%$711.85 million$33.24 million-126.97
DRDGOLD logo
DRD
DRDGOLD
1.7$10.08+3.1%$692.40 million$269.51 million19.38
Amyris logo
AMRS
Amyris
1.5$2.88+9.0%$688.93 million$152.56 million-1.29Analyst Report
MNRL
Brigham Minerals
2.1$11.87+0.5%$670.47 million$101.51 million-593.50
Koppers logo
KOP
Koppers
1.6$28.50+0.5%$600.35 million$1.77 billion4.91Insider Selling
Clearwater Paper logo
CLW
Clearwater Paper
1.5$35.61+3.1%$590.17 million$1.76 billion10.54Analyst Downgrade
Mercer International logo
MERC
Mercer International
1.7$8.63+0.2%$568.44 million$1.62 billion-7.31Analyst Upgrade
Green Plains logo
GPRE
Green Plains
1.1$15.87+1.6%$565.89 million$2.42 billion-5.59
TG
Tredegar
0.8$16.54+3.9%$554.06 million$972.36 million206.78
Hawkins logo
HWKN
Hawkins
2.0$51.79+3.4%$552.65 million$540.20 million16.49Heavy News Reporting
Endeavour Silver logo
EXK
Endeavour Silver
1.4$3.34+2.4%$525.96 million$121.72 million-12.85
Arch Resources logo
ARCH
Arch Resources
1.2$34.62+0.4%$524.39 million$2.29 billion-1.91
AdvanSix logo
ASIX
AdvanSix
1.5$18.62+4.4%$521.92 million$1.30 billion30.03
SMTS
Sierra Metals
0.5$2.92+1.4%$475.38 millionN/A0.00
American Vanguard logo
AVD
American Vanguard
0.6$15.52+1.2%$470.07 million$468.19 million41.95
Valhi logo
VHI
Valhi
1.3$16.18+4.9%$457.46 million$1.90 billion11.89Heavy News Reporting
Resolute Forest Products logo
RFP
Resolute Forest Products
1.0$5.60+2.9%$456.59 million$2.92 billion-4.67Insider Selling
Ryerson logo
RYI
Ryerson
1.6$11.15+8.9%$425.01 million$4.50 billion15.49
Rayonier Advanced Materials logo
RYAM
Rayonier Advanced Materials
1.3$6.57+6.8%$416.18 million$1.78 billion-15.64
GSS
Golden Star Resources
0.3$3.66+2.5%$406.17 millionN/A0.00
McEwen Mining logo
MUX
McEwen Mining
1.5$0.98+3.1%$399.64 million$117.02 million-2.51
Verso logo
VRS
Verso
2.6$10.99+2.1%$370.62 million$2.44 billion2.03
PROF
Profound Medical
1.3$18.65+2.1%$362.46 millionN/A0.00
U.S. Silica logo
SLCA
U.S. Silica
1.3$4.80+4.4%$354.96 million$1.47 billion-0.84Analyst Downgrade
MTA
Metalla Royalty & Streaming
0.8$8.91+2.2%$351.82 million$2.70 million-68.53
Piedmont Lithium logo
PLL
Piedmont Lithium
1.1$28.69+1.1%$331.46 millionN/A-42.19
NOG
Northern Oil and Gas
0.5$6.89+1.5%$315.91 millionN/A0.00
Mechel PAO logo
MTL
Mechel PAO
1.3$1.51+0.7%$314.28 million$4.60 billion0.00
Veritiv logo
VRTV
Veritiv
1.3$19.62+0.2%$311.84 million$7.66 billion-29.73
MSB
Mesabi Trust
1.1$23.70+0.3%$310.94 million$31.99 million15.91Heavy News Reporting
Haynes International logo
HAYN
Haynes International
1.5$22.66+2.0%$286.02 million$490.21 million55.27Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Oil-Dri Co. of America logo
ODC
Oil-Dri Co. of America
1.3$36.02+0.6%$268.78 million$283.23 million14.24
TGB
Taseko Mines
0.4$0.89+4.5%$247.20 millionN/A0.00
Ciner Resources logo
CINR
Ciner Resources
0.9$12.50+1.4%$247.09 million$522.80 million15.06
Venator Materials logo
VNTR
Venator Materials
1.1$2.27+0.0%$241.89 million$2.13 billion-1.18High Trading Volume
NL Industries logo
NL
NL Industries
0.9$4.89+0.8%$238.58 million$124.20 million14.38
TimkenSteel logo
TMST
TimkenSteel
1.1$5.10+1.4%$230.28 million$1.21 billion-1.84
UEC
Uranium Energy
0.5$1.11+7.2%$219.09 millionN/A0.00High Trading Volume
BIOX
Bioceres Crop Solutions
1.2$5.59+0.2%$215.19 millionN/A0.00
Intrepid Potash logo
IPI
Intrepid Potash
0.8$13.51+5.0%$179.60 million$220.07 million-7.19
Marrone Bio Innovations logo
MBII
Marrone Bio Innovations
1.3$1.16+0.0%$176.87 million$29.37 million-4.00
Olympic Steel logo
ZEUS
Olympic Steel
1.2$15.26+3.5%$169.00 million$1.58 billion-28.26
Trecora Resources logo
TREC
Trecora Resources
1.7$6.81+1.0%$169.00 million$258.96 million-15.84High Trading Volume
L.B. Foster logo
FSTR
L.B. Foster
2.2$14.61+0.1%$157.00 million$655.06 million4.92
MKD
Molecular Data
0.5$1.18+2.5%$135.75 millionN/A0.00High Trading Volume
Heavy News Reporting
AgroFresh Solutions logo
AGFS
AgroFresh Solutions
1.6$2.38+1.3%$126.27 million$170.07 million-1.56
This page was last updated on 11/26/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.