GSM vs. MTRN, CMP, SXC, SCCO, FCX, SSRM, TMC, FSM, SKE, and AMR
Should you be buying Ferroglobe stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Ferroglobe include Materion (MTRN), Compass Minerals International (CMP), SunCoke Energy (SXC), Southern Copper (SCCO), Freeport-McMoRan (FCX), Silver Standard Resources (SSRM), TMC the metals (TMC), Fortuna Mining (FSM), Skeena Resources (SKE), and Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR).
Ferroglobe vs. Its Competitors
Materion (NYSE:MTRN) and Ferroglobe (NASDAQ:GSM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and media sentiment.
Materion pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Ferroglobe pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Materion pays out 112.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ferroglobe pays out -18.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Materion has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Ferroglobe has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Ferroglobe is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
Materion has a net margin of 0.59% compared to Ferroglobe's net margin of -3.80%. Materion's return on equity of 12.83% beat Ferroglobe's return on equity.
Ferroglobe has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Materion. Ferroglobe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Materion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Materion has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferroglobe has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500.
93.6% of Materion shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.6% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Materion shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
In the previous week, Materion had 5 more articles in the media than Ferroglobe. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Materion and 2 mentions for Ferroglobe. Ferroglobe's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Materion's score of 0.46 indicating that Ferroglobe is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Summary
Materion beats Ferroglobe on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Ferroglobe News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GSM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GSM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Ferroglobe Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (NASDAQ:GSM) was last updated on 7/3/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
