Skeena Resources (SKE) Competitors

$33.56 +0.95 (+2.90%)

As of 03:27 PM Eastern

SKE vs. RGLD, AEM, AGI, FNV, and KGC

Should you be buying Skeena Resources stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Skeena Resources include Royal Gold (RGLD), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), Alamos Gold (AGI), Franco-Nevada (FNV), and Kinross Gold (KGC). These companies are all part of the "basic materials" sector.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Royal Gold?

Skeena Resources (NYSE:SKE) and Royal Gold (NASDAQ:RGLD) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Skeena Resources has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Royal Gold has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Royal Gold has a consensus price target of $273.64, indicating a potential upside of 11.31%. Given Royal Gold's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Royal Gold is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Skeena Resources	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Royal Gold	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

In the previous week, Royal Gold had 24 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Royal Gold and 4 mentions for Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Royal Gold's score of 0.55 indicating that Skeena Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Skeena Resources	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Royal Gold	13 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Royal Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Royal Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Skeena Resources	N/A	N/A	-$130.86M	-$1.13	N/A
Royal Gold	$1.03B	20.25	$467.27M	$8.39	29.30

45.2% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of Royal Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Royal Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Royal Gold has a net margin of 48.59% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Royal Gold's return on equity of 12.63% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Skeena Resources	N/A	-35.37%	-7.86%
Royal Gold	48.59%	12.63%	9.99%

Summary

Royal Gold beats Skeena Resources on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Skeena Resources (NYSE:SKE) and Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus price target of $238.18, indicating a potential upside of 20.86%. Given Agnico Eagle Mines' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Agnico Eagle Mines is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Skeena Resources	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Agnico Eagle Mines	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.69

Skeena Resources has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Skeena Resources	N/A	N/A	-$130.86M	-$1.13	N/A
Agnico Eagle Mines	$11.91B	8.28	$4.46B	$10.64	18.52

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 27 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 4 mentions for Skeena Resources. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Skeena Resources' score of 0.73 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Skeena Resources	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Agnico Eagle Mines	17 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 21.09% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Skeena Resources	N/A	-35.37%	-7.86%
Agnico Eagle Mines	39.46%	21.09%	15.27%

45.2% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Skeena Resources on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Alamos Gold?

Alamos Gold (NYSE:AGI) and Skeena Resources (NYSE:SKE) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Skeena Resources has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.2% of Skeena Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Skeena Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alamos Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alamos Gold	$1.81B	10.29	$885.80M	$2.51	17.66
Skeena Resources	N/A	N/A	-$130.86M	-$1.13	N/A

Alamos Gold currently has a consensus target price of $50.67, suggesting a potential upside of 14.31%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alamos Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Skeena Resources	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 6 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Alamos Gold and 4 mentions for Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Alamos Gold's score of 0.60 indicating that Skeena Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alamos Gold	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Skeena Resources	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.24% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 18.03% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alamos Gold	51.24%	18.03%	12.42%
Skeena Resources	N/A	-35.37%	-7.86%

Summary

Alamos Gold beats Skeena Resources on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Franco-Nevada?

Franco-Nevada (NYSE:FNV) and Skeena Resources (NYSE:SKE) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Skeena Resources has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Franco-Nevada has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Franco-Nevada	$1.82B	24.96	$1.11B	$5.76	40.95
Skeena Resources	N/A	N/A	-$130.86M	-$1.13	N/A

In the previous week, Franco-Nevada had 1 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Franco-Nevada and 4 mentions for Skeena Resources. Franco-Nevada's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Skeena Resources' score of 0.73 indicating that Franco-Nevada is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Franco-Nevada	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Skeena Resources	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Franco-Nevada currently has a consensus target price of $257.25, suggesting a potential upside of 9.06%. Given Franco-Nevada's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Franco-Nevada is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Franco-Nevada	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
Skeena Resources	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

77.1% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.2% of Skeena Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Skeena Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 61.01% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Franco-Nevada's return on equity of 15.62% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Franco-Nevada	61.01%	15.62%	14.61%
Skeena Resources	N/A	-35.37%	-7.86%

Summary

Franco-Nevada beats Skeena Resources on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Kinross Gold?

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and Skeena Resources (NYSE:SKE) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Skeena Resources has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinross Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kinross Gold	$7.05B	5.38	$2.39B	$2.36	13.46
Skeena Resources	N/A	N/A	-$130.86M	-$1.13	N/A

In the previous week, Kinross Gold had 6 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Kinross Gold and 4 mentions for Skeena Resources. Kinross Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Skeena Resources' score of 0.73 indicating that Kinross Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Kinross Gold	6 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Skeena Resources	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Kinross Gold currently has a consensus target price of $38.81, suggesting a potential upside of 22.15%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kinross Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
Skeena Resources	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

63.7% of Kinross Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.2% of Skeena Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Skeena Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Kinross Gold has a net margin of 35.99% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 32.47% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kinross Gold	35.99%	32.47%	22.37%
Skeena Resources	N/A	-35.37%	-7.86%

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Skeena Resources on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Skeena Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SKE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SKE vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Skeena Resources	MINING Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$4.09B	$10.37B	$4.98B	$22.96B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.58%	4.96%	4.03%
P/E Ratio	-29.73	16.15	23.29	28.77
Price / Sales	N/A	202.17	7,481.80	104.62
Price / Cash	N/A	40.05	24.46	19.21
Price / Book	35.71	5.12	7.05	4.63
Net Income	-$130.86M	$315.03M	$159.16M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	14.44%	5.56%	4.21%	-0.47%
1 Month Performance	0.60%	12.70%	4.40%	3.59%
1 Year Performance	191.62%	144.35%	85.35%	24.93%

Skeena Resources Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SKE Skeena Resources	1.598 of 5 stars	$33.57 +2.9%	N/A	+159.2%	$4.09B	N/A	N/A	60
RGLD Royal Gold	4.0264 of 5 stars	$225.90 -1.1%	$273.64 +21.1%	+33.0%	$19.38B	$1.03B	33.17	30	Insider Trade
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines	4.7302 of 5 stars	$178.11 -1.0%	$238.18 +33.7%	+68.3%	$90.05B	$11.91B	16.74	18,216	Analyst Revision
AGI Alamos Gold	4.8359 of 5 stars	$38.87 -0.5%	$50.67 +30.4%	+62.4%	$16.40B	$1.81B	15.48	3,234	Gap Down
FNV Franco-Nevada	4.2713 of 5 stars	$225.17 +0.5%	$257.25 +14.2%	+40.7%	$43.19B	$1.82B	39.09	40	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:SKE) was last updated on 5/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Skeena Resources (SKE) Competitors

SKE vs. RGLD, AEM, AGI, FNV, and KGC

How does Skeena Resources compare to Royal Gold?

Summary

How does Skeena Resources compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Summary

How does Skeena Resources compare to Alamos Gold?

Summary

How does Skeena Resources compare to Franco-Nevada?

Summary

How does Skeena Resources compare to Kinross Gold?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SKE vs. The Competition

Skeena Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Skeena Resources (SKE) Competitors

SKE vs. RGLD, AEM, AGI, FNV, and KGC

How does Skeena Resources compare to Royal Gold?

Which has more volatility and risk, SKE or RGLD?

Do analysts rate SKE or RGLD?

Does the media prefer SKE or RGLD?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, SKE or RGLD?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in SKE or RGLD?

Is SKE or RGLD more profitable?

Summary

How does Skeena Resources compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Do analysts rate SKE or AEM?

Which has more volatility and risk, SKE or AEM?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, SKE or AEM?

Does the media prefer SKE or AEM?

Is SKE or AEM more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in SKE or AEM?

Summary

How does Skeena Resources compare to Alamos Gold?

Which has more volatility and risk, AGI or SKE?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in AGI or SKE?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, AGI or SKE?

Do analysts prefer AGI or SKE?

Does the media favor AGI or SKE?

Is AGI or SKE more profitable?

Summary

How does Skeena Resources compare to Franco-Nevada?

Which has more volatility and risk, FNV or SKE?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, FNV or SKE?

Does the media favor FNV or SKE?

Do analysts prefer FNV or SKE?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in FNV or SKE?

Is FNV or SKE more profitable?

Summary

How does Skeena Resources compare to Kinross Gold?

Which has more risk and volatility, KGC or SKE?

Which has better earnings & valuation, KGC or SKE?

Does the media refer more to KGC or SKE?

Do analysts rate KGC or SKE?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in KGC or SKE?

Is KGC or SKE more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SKE vs. The Competition

Skeena Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools