Free Trial

Skeena Resources (SKE) Competitors

Skeena Resources logo
$30.21 -0.05 (-0.16%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$30.24 +0.03 (+0.11%)
As of 05:25 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SKE vs. RGLD, AEM, AGI, FNV, and KGC

Should you buy Skeena Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Skeena Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Skeena Resources include Royal Gold (RGLD), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), Alamos Gold (AGI), Franco-Nevada (FNV), and Kinross Gold (KGC). These companies are all part of the "basic materials" sector.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Royal Gold?

Skeena Resources (NYSE:SKE) and Royal Gold (NASDAQ:RGLD) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Royal Gold has a net margin of 48.59% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Royal Gold's return on equity of 12.63% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Skeena ResourcesN/A -46.80% -8.37%
Royal Gold 48.59%12.63%9.99%

Royal Gold has a consensus price target of $273.64, indicating a potential upside of 25.60%. Given Royal Gold's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Royal Gold is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Skeena Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Royal Gold
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

45.2% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of Royal Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Royal Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Skeena Resources has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Royal Gold has a beta of 0.42, meaning that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Royal Gold had 7 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Royal Gold and 4 mentions for Skeena Resources. Royal Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Skeena Resources' score of -0.90 indicating that Royal Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Skeena Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Royal Gold
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Royal Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Royal Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-$130.86M-$1.51N/A
Royal Gold$1.03B17.94$467.27M$8.3925.97

Summary

Royal Gold beats Skeena Resources on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Skeena Resources (NYSE:SKE) and Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-$130.86M-$1.51N/A
Agnico Eagle Mines$11.91B7.42$4.46B$10.6416.60

Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus price target of $236.08, indicating a potential upside of 33.64%. Given Agnico Eagle Mines' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Agnico Eagle Mines is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Skeena Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Agnico Eagle Mines
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.76

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 21.09% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Skeena ResourcesN/A -46.80% -8.37%
Agnico Eagle Mines 39.46%21.09%15.27%

Skeena Resources has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

45.2% of Skeena Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Skeena Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 4 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 4 mentions for Skeena Resources. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Skeena Resources' score of -0.90 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Skeena Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Agnico Eagle Mines
3 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Skeena Resources on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Alamos Gold?

Skeena Resources (NYSE:SKE) and Alamos Gold (NYSE:AGI) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alamos Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-$130.86M-$1.51N/A
Alamos Gold$1.81B9.20$885.80M$2.5115.78

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 2 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Alamos Gold and 4 mentions for Skeena Resources. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Skeena Resources' score of -0.90 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Skeena Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Alamos Gold
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Skeena Resources has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold has a consensus price target of $50.67, indicating a potential upside of 27.92%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Skeena Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Alamos Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

45.2% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.24% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 18.03% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Skeena ResourcesN/A -46.80% -8.37%
Alamos Gold 51.24%18.03%12.42%

Summary

Alamos Gold beats Skeena Resources on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Franco-Nevada?

Franco-Nevada (NYSE:FNV) and Skeena Resources (NYSE:SKE) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

77.1% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.2% of Skeena Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Skeena Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Franco-Nevada had 1 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Franco-Nevada and 4 mentions for Skeena Resources. Franco-Nevada's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Skeena Resources' score of -0.90 indicating that Franco-Nevada is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Franco-Nevada
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Skeena Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Franco-Nevada has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Franco-Nevada$1.82B24.15$1.11B$7.1032.15
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-$130.86M-$1.51N/A

Franco-Nevada presently has a consensus price target of $271.00, suggesting a potential upside of 18.72%. Given Franco-Nevada's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Franco-Nevada is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Franco-Nevada
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Skeena Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Skeena Resources has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 65.12% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Franco-Nevada's return on equity of 18.10% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Franco-Nevada65.12% 18.10% 16.82%
Skeena Resources N/A -46.80%-8.37%

Summary

Franco-Nevada beats Skeena Resources on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Kinross Gold?

Skeena Resources (NYSE:SKE) and Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Kinross Gold had 9 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Kinross Gold and 4 mentions for Skeena Resources. Kinross Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Skeena Resources' score of -0.90 indicating that Kinross Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Skeena Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Kinross Gold
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Skeena Resources has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Kinross Gold has a consensus target price of $38.81, suggesting a potential upside of 33.24%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Skeena Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Kinross Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinross Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-$130.86M-$1.51N/A
Kinross Gold$7.05B4.93$2.39B$2.3612.34

45.2% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.7% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kinross Gold has a net margin of 35.99% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 32.47% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Skeena ResourcesN/A -46.80% -8.37%
Kinross Gold 35.99%32.47%22.37%

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Skeena Resources on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Skeena Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SKE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SKE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SKE vs. The Competition

MetricSkeena ResourcesMINING IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.68B$10.38B$4.91B$23.24B
Dividend YieldN/A1.59%4.94%4.09%
P/E Ratio-20.0115.8223.4430.90
Price / SalesN/A213.657,469.3624.20
Price / CashN/A38.8824.4119.43
Price / Book32.144.779.534.72
Net Income-$130.86M$319.20M$156.62M$1.07B
7 Day Performance6.84%6.06%1.61%1.37%
1 Month PerformanceN/AN/A19.64%0.45%
1 Year Performance136.21%132.79%77.23%27.94%

Skeena Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SKE
Skeena Resources
0.8847 of 5 stars
$30.21
-0.2%
N/A+136.9%$3.68BN/AN/A60
RGLD
Royal Gold
4.7789 of 5 stars
$225.95
+2.6%
$273.64
+21.1%
+26.4%$18.70B$1.03B26.9330
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines
4.5671 of 5 stars
$180.58
+2.7%
$236.08
+30.7%
+55.5%$88.04B$11.91B16.9718,216
AGI
Alamos Gold
4.8383 of 5 stars
$40.15
+4.7%
$50.67
+26.2%
+57.8%$16.10B$1.81B16.003,234
FNV
Franco-Nevada
4.0381 of 5 stars
$229.30
+1.4%
$271.00
+18.2%
+36.6%$43.62B$1.82B32.3040

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:SKE) was last updated on 6/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners