Go Pro
→ A letter from Shannon Stansberry (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free SKE Stock Alerts

Skeena Resources (SKE) Competitors

Skeena Resources logo
$27.18 -0.06 (-0.23%)
Closing price 07/10/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$26.71 -0.47 (-1.74%)
As of 05:00 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

SKE vs. RGLD, AEM, AGI, IAG, and KGC

Should you buy Skeena Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Skeena Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Skeena Resources include Royal Gold (RGLD), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), Alamos Gold (AGI), Iamgold (IAG), and Kinross Gold (KGC). These companies are all part of the "basic materials" sector.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Royal Gold?

Skeena Resources (NYSE:SKE) and Royal Gold (NASDAQ:RGLD) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

45.2% of Skeena Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of Royal Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Skeena Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Royal Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Royal Gold had 5 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Royal Gold and 0 mentions for Skeena Resources. Royal Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Skeena Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Royal Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Skeena Resources Neutral
Royal Gold Positive

Royal Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Royal Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-$130.86M-$1.51N/A
Royal Gold$1.31B12.79$467.27M$8.3923.46

Royal Gold has a consensus target price of $282.55, suggesting a potential upside of 43.55%. Given Royal Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Royal Gold is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Skeena Resources
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Royal Gold
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62

Royal Gold has a net margin of 48.59% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Royal Gold's return on equity of 12.63% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Skeena ResourcesN/A -46.80% -8.37%
Royal Gold 48.59%12.63%9.99%

Skeena Resources has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Royal Gold has a beta of 0.44, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Royal Gold beats Skeena Resources on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) and Skeena Resources (NYSE:SKE) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Skeena Resources has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.2% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 21.09% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Agnico Eagle Mines39.46% 21.09% 15.27%
Skeena Resources N/A -46.80%-8.37%

Agnico Eagle Mines presently has a consensus target price of $238.31, indicating a potential upside of 62.41%. Given Agnico Eagle Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Agnico Eagle Mines is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Agnico Eagle Mines
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Skeena Resources
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Agnico Eagle Mines$11.91B6.25$4.46B$10.6413.79
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-$130.86M-$1.51N/A

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 26 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 0 mentions for Skeena Resources. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Skeena Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Agnico Eagle Mines Neutral
Skeena Resources Neutral

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Skeena Resources on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Alamos Gold?

Skeena Resources (NYSE:SKE) and Alamos Gold (NYSE:AGI) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alamos Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-$130.86M-$1.51N/A
Alamos Gold$1.81B6.81$885.80M$2.5111.73

Skeena Resources has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold has a consensus price target of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 61.36%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Skeena Resources
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Alamos Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91

45.2% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.24% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 18.03% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Skeena ResourcesN/A -46.80% -8.37%
Alamos Gold 51.24%18.03%12.42%

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 8 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Alamos Gold and 0 mentions for Skeena Resources. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Skeena Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Skeena Resources Neutral
Alamos Gold Neutral

Summary

Alamos Gold beats Skeena Resources on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Iamgold?

Skeena Resources (NYSE:SKE) and Iamgold (NYSE:IAG) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

Iamgold has a consensus target price of $19.60, suggesting a potential upside of 27.85%. Given Iamgold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Iamgold is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Skeena Resources
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Iamgold
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

45.2% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.1% of Iamgold shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Iamgold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Iamgold has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Iamgold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-$130.86M-$1.51N/A
Iamgold$2.85B3.11$664.40M$1.728.91

Iamgold has a net margin of 29.49% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Iamgold's return on equity of 26.65% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Skeena ResourcesN/A -46.80% -8.37%
Iamgold 29.49%26.65%18.54%

In the previous week, Iamgold had 5 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Iamgold and 0 mentions for Skeena Resources. Iamgold's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Skeena Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Iamgold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Skeena Resources Neutral
Iamgold Positive

Skeena Resources has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Iamgold has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Iamgold beats Skeena Resources on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Kinross Gold?

Skeena Resources (NYSE:SKE) and Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

Kinross Gold has a net margin of 35.99% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 32.47% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Skeena ResourcesN/A -46.80% -8.37%
Kinross Gold 35.99%32.47%22.37%

In the previous week, Kinross Gold had 8 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Kinross Gold and 0 mentions for Skeena Resources. Kinross Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Skeena Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Kinross Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Skeena Resources Neutral
Kinross Gold Positive

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinross Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-$130.86M-$1.51N/A
Kinross Gold$7.05B4.06$2.39B$2.3610.22

45.2% of Skeena Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.7% of Kinross Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Skeena Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kinross Gold has a consensus target price of $37.81, suggesting a potential upside of 56.71%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Skeena Resources
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Kinross Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Skeena Resources has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Skeena Resources on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Skeena Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SKE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SKE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SKE vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSkeena ResourcesMINING IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.39B$8.72B$4.56B$23.43B
Dividend YieldN/A1.94%5.03%4.02%
P/E Ratio-18.0014.0421.0631.40
Price / SalesN/A155.135,822.99170.55
Price / CashN/A37.0824.1718.64
Price / Book28.913.788.744.77
Net Income-$130.86M$316.46M$157.26M$1.06B
7 Day Performance-3.40%-2.78%-1.43%-0.39%
1 Month Performance-3.16%-9.17%-3.32%0.05%
1 Year Performance66.92%57.12%39.34%17.05%

Skeena Resources Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SKE
Skeena Resources
0.7591 of 5 stars		$27.18
-0.2%		N/A+66.9%$3.39BN/AN/A60
RGLD
Royal Gold
4.8926 of 5 stars		$196.61
-2.6%		$280.30
+42.6%		+23.0%$17.14B$1.03B23.4330
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines
4.5979 of 5 stars		$150.21
-3.1%		$236.85
+57.7%		+22.5%$78.64B$11.91B14.1218,216
AGI
Alamos Gold
4.9874 of 5 stars		$30.49
-3.4%		$53.00
+73.8%		+10.7%$13.23B$2.07B12.153,234
IAG
Iamgold
4.7483 of 5 stars		$15.85
-4.3%		$17.75
+12.0%		+117.4%$9.57B$2.85B9.214,391

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:SKE) was last updated on 7/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
From the man who predicted 2008 crash…
Porter Stansberry, founder of one of the largest financial research firms in the world, says he's breaking the...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel