Go Pro

Lithium Americas (Argentina) (LAAC) Competitors

Lithium Americas (Argentina) logo
$7.98 -0.19 (-2.33%)
As of 07/2/2026

LAAC vs. KNF, TTAM, LEU, ERO, and AESI

Should you buy Lithium Americas (Argentina) stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Lithium Americas (Argentina) with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Lithium Americas (Argentina) include Knife River (KNF), Titan America (TTAM), Centrus Energy (LEU), Ero Copper (ERO), and Atlas Energy Solutions (AESI). These companies are all part of the "non-metallic and industrial metal mining" industry.

How does Lithium Americas (Argentina) compare to Knife River?

Knife River (NYSE:KNF) and Lithium Americas (Argentina) (NYSE:LAAC) are both non-metallic and industrial metal mining companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Knife River has a net margin of 4.58% compared to Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s net margin of 0.00%. Knife River's return on equity of 9.35% beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Knife River4.58% 9.35% 3.96%
Lithium Americas (Argentina) N/A -1.37%-1.08%

Knife River presently has a consensus price target of $97.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.38%. Given Knife River's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Knife River is more favorable than Lithium Americas (Argentina).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Knife River
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Lithium Americas (Argentina)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Knife River had 1 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas (Argentina). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Knife River and 0 mentions for Lithium Americas (Argentina). Knife River's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lithium Americas (Argentina)'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Knife River Neutral
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Neutral

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Knife River. Lithium Americas (Argentina) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Knife River, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Knife River$3.15B1.53$157.07M$2.5733.00
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/AN/A$1.29B$7.791.02

Knife River has a beta of 0.37, suggesting that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lithium Americas (Argentina) has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

80.1% of Knife River shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.2% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Knife River shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.8% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Knife River beats Lithium Americas (Argentina) on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas (Argentina) compare to Titan America?

Lithium Americas (Argentina) (NYSE:LAAC) and Titan America (NYSE:TTAM) are both non-metallic and industrial metal mining companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Titan America has a consensus target price of $17.42, suggesting a potential downside of 4.20%. Given Titan America's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Titan America is more favorable than Lithium Americas (Argentina).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas (Argentina)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Titan America
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Titan America. Lithium Americas (Argentina) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Titan America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/AN/A$1.29B$7.791.02
Titan America$1.66B2.01$185.44M$1.0118.00

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Titan America has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Titan America has a net margin of 11.08% compared to Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s net margin of 0.00%. Titan America's return on equity of 18.35% beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/A -1.37% -1.08%
Titan America 11.08%18.35%9.91%

In the previous week, Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Titan America'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Neutral
Titan America Neutral

49.2% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by institutional investors. 19.8% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Titan America beats Lithium Americas (Argentina) on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas (Argentina) compare to Centrus Energy?

Centrus Energy (NYSE:LEU) and Lithium Americas (Argentina) (NYSE:LAAC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and valuation.

In the previous week, Centrus Energy had 6 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas (Argentina). MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Centrus Energy and 0 mentions for Lithium Americas (Argentina). Centrus Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Centrus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Centrus Energy Neutral
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Neutral

Centrus Energy presently has a consensus price target of $271.18, indicating a potential upside of 67.18%. Given Centrus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Centrus Energy is more favorable than Lithium Americas (Argentina).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Centrus Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Lithium Americas (Argentina)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Centrus Energy. Lithium Americas (Argentina) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centrus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Centrus Energy$452.30M7.06$77.80M$3.0253.71
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/AN/A$1.29B$7.791.02

Centrus Energy has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lithium Americas (Argentina) has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

50.0% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.2% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.8% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Centrus Energy has a net margin of 13.40% compared to Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s net margin of 0.00%. Centrus Energy's return on equity of 13.10% beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Centrus Energy13.40% 13.10% 3.51%
Lithium Americas (Argentina) N/A -1.37%-1.08%

Summary

Centrus Energy beats Lithium Americas (Argentina) on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas (Argentina) compare to Ero Copper?

Lithium Americas (Argentina) (NYSE:LAAC) and Ero Copper (NYSE:ERO) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Ero Copper has a net margin of 31.63% compared to Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s net margin of 0.00%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 27.33% beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/A -1.37% -1.08%
Ero Copper 31.63%27.33%13.47%

Ero Copper has a consensus price target of $31.50, suggesting a potential upside of 20.35%. Given Ero Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ero Copper is more favorable than Lithium Americas (Argentina).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas (Argentina)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ero Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

49.2% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.3% of Ero Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.8% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ero Copper. Lithium Americas (Argentina) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/AN/A$1.29B$7.791.02
Ero Copper$923.93M2.95$263.72M$2.819.31

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ero Copper has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ero Copper had 5 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas (Argentina). MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Ero Copper and 0 mentions for Lithium Americas (Argentina). Ero Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Ero Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Neutral
Ero Copper Neutral

Summary

Ero Copper beats Lithium Americas (Argentina) on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas (Argentina) compare to Atlas Energy Solutions?

Atlas Energy Solutions (NYSE:AESI) and Lithium Americas (Argentina) (NYSE:LAAC) are both small-cap non-metallic and industrial metal mining companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

Atlas Energy Solutions has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lithium Americas (Argentina) has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

34.6% of Atlas Energy Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.2% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.4% of Atlas Energy Solutions shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.8% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Atlas Energy Solutions. Atlas Energy Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lithium Americas (Argentina), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Atlas Energy Solutions$1.06B1.70-$50.30M-$0.79N/A
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/AN/A$1.29B$7.791.02

In the previous week, Atlas Energy Solutions had 1 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas (Argentina). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Atlas Energy Solutions and 0 mentions for Lithium Americas (Argentina). Atlas Energy Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Atlas Energy Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Atlas Energy Solutions Positive
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Neutral

Atlas Energy Solutions currently has a consensus target price of $20.00, indicating a potential upside of 38.58%. Given Atlas Energy Solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Atlas Energy Solutions is more favorable than Lithium Americas (Argentina).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Atlas Energy Solutions
3 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.10
Lithium Americas (Argentina)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Atlas Energy Solutions' net margin of -9.29%. Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s return on equity of -1.37% beat Atlas Energy Solutions' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Atlas Energy Solutions-9.29% -7.42% -4.01%
Lithium Americas (Argentina) N/A -1.37%-1.08%

Summary

Lithium Americas (Argentina) beats Atlas Energy Solutions on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lithium Americas (Argentina) News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LAAC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LAAC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LAAC vs. The Competition

MetricLithium Americas (Argentina)Metal mining IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.29B$3.81B$4.66B$23.48B
Dividend YieldN/A3.22%5.03%4.00%
P/E Ratio1.0223.0023.1431.55
Price / SalesN/A191.596,055.68120.06
Price / Cash14.9513.2626.8125.23
Price / Book1.552.698.784.81
Net Income$1.29B$247.78M$157.26M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-0.75%1.91%1.40%0.56%
1 Month Performance-26.52%-13.04%-5.15%3.96%
1 Year Performance241.03%44.51%47.03%18.27%

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LAAC
Lithium Americas (Argentina)
N/A$7.98
-2.3%
N/A+289.0%$1.29BN/A1.02850
KNF
Knife River
2.4832 of 5 stars
$83.89
-2.4%
$97.00
+15.6%
+4.5%$4.76B$3.15B32.645,298
TTAM
Titan America
N/A$18.67
+0.5%
$17.42
-6.7%
+43.3%$3.44B$1.66B18.482,554
LEU
Centrus Energy
2.5659 of 5 stars
$168.05
+4.9%
$271.18
+61.4%
-8.1%$3.31B$452.30M55.65280
ERO
Ero Copper
4.4878 of 5 stars
$26.69
+2.9%
$31.50
+18.0%
+50.1%$2.78B$923.93M9.503,547

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:LAAC) was last updated on 7/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners