Free Trial
The Market Does Not Wait. MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Get the Deal
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Lithium Americas (Argentina) (LAAC) Competitors

Lithium Americas (Argentina) logo
$9.19 -0.35 (-3.67%)
As of 05/22/2026

LAAC vs. AUGO, KNF, LEU, TTAM, and ERO

Should you buy Lithium Americas (Argentina) stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Lithium Americas (Argentina) with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Lithium Americas (Argentina) include Aura Minerals (AUGO), Knife River (KNF), Centrus Energy (LEU), Titan America (TTAM), and Ero Copper (ERO). These companies are all part of the "non-metallic and industrial metal mining" industry.

How does Lithium Americas (Argentina) compare to Aura Minerals?

Aura Minerals (NASDAQ:AUGO) and Lithium Americas (Argentina) (NYSE:LAAC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aura Minerals. Lithium Americas (Argentina) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aura Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aura Minerals$1.14B5.32-$79.34M$1.0867.20
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/AN/A$1.29B$7.791.18

Aura Minerals presently has a consensus target price of $67.60, indicating a potential downside of 6.86%. Given Aura Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Aura Minerals is more favorable than Lithium Americas (Argentina).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aura Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Lithium Americas (Argentina)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

49.2% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by institutional investors. 19.8% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Aura Minerals had 5 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas (Argentina). MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Aura Minerals and 0 mentions for Lithium Americas (Argentina). Aura Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Aura Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aura Minerals Positive
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Neutral

Aura Minerals has a net margin of 7.80% compared to Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s net margin of 0.00%. Aura Minerals' return on equity of 111.96% beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aura Minerals7.80% 111.96% 19.71%
Lithium Americas (Argentina) N/A -1.37%-1.08%

Summary

Aura Minerals beats Lithium Americas (Argentina) on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas (Argentina) compare to Knife River?

Knife River (NYSE:KNF) and Lithium Americas (Argentina) (NYSE:LAAC) are both non-metallic and industrial metal mining companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Knife River. Lithium Americas (Argentina) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Knife River, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Knife River$3.20B1.28$157.07M$2.5728.17
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/AN/A$1.29B$7.791.18

Knife River currently has a consensus price target of $98.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.35%. Given Knife River's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Knife River is more favorable than Lithium Americas (Argentina).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Knife River
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Lithium Americas (Argentina)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Knife River had 2 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas (Argentina). MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Knife River and 0 mentions for Lithium Americas (Argentina). Knife River's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Knife River is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Knife River Positive
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Neutral

Knife River has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lithium Americas (Argentina) has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

Knife River has a net margin of 4.58% compared to Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s net margin of 0.00%. Knife River's return on equity of 9.35% beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Knife River4.58% 9.35% 3.96%
Lithium Americas (Argentina) N/A -1.37%-1.08%

80.1% of Knife River shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.2% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Knife River shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.8% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Knife River beats Lithium Americas (Argentina) on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas (Argentina) compare to Centrus Energy?

Lithium Americas (Argentina) (NYSE:LAAC) and Centrus Energy (NYSE:LEU) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Centrus Energy. Lithium Americas (Argentina) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centrus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/AN/A$1.29B$7.791.18
Centrus Energy$448.70M7.86$77.80M$3.0259.35

49.2% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.0% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.8% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Centrus Energy had 3 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas (Argentina). MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Centrus Energy and 0 mentions for Lithium Americas (Argentina). Centrus Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Centrus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Neutral
Centrus Energy Positive

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Centrus Energy has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Centrus Energy has a net margin of 13.40% compared to Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s net margin of 0.00%. Centrus Energy's return on equity of 13.10% beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/A -1.37% -1.08%
Centrus Energy 13.40%13.10%3.51%

Centrus Energy has a consensus target price of $268.18, indicating a potential upside of 49.61%. Given Centrus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Centrus Energy is more favorable than Lithium Americas (Argentina).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas (Argentina)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Centrus Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Summary

Centrus Energy beats Lithium Americas (Argentina) on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas (Argentina) compare to Titan America?

Titan America (NYSE:TTAM) and Lithium Americas (Argentina) (NYSE:LAAC) are both non-metallic and industrial metal mining companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

49.2% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.8% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Titan America has a net margin of 11.08% compared to Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s net margin of 0.00%. Titan America's return on equity of 18.35% beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Titan America11.08% 18.35% 9.91%
Lithium Americas (Argentina) N/A -1.37%-1.08%

Titan America presently has a consensus target price of $17.42, indicating a potential upside of 15.03%. Given Titan America's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Titan America is more favorable than Lithium Americas (Argentina).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Titan America
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14
Lithium Americas (Argentina)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Titan America has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lithium Americas (Argentina) has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Titan America. Lithium Americas (Argentina) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Titan America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Titan America$1.67B1.67$185.44M$1.0114.99
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/AN/A$1.29B$7.791.18

In the previous week, Titan America had 5 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas (Argentina). MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Titan America and 0 mentions for Lithium Americas (Argentina). Titan America's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Titan America is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Titan America Positive
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Neutral

Summary

Titan America beats Lithium Americas (Argentina) on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas (Argentina) compare to Ero Copper?

Lithium Americas (Argentina) (NYSE:LAAC) and Ero Copper (NYSE:ERO) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Ero Copper has a net margin of 31.63% compared to Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s net margin of 0.00%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 29.86% beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/A -1.37% -1.08%
Ero Copper 31.63%29.86%14.08%

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ero Copper. Lithium Americas (Argentina) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/AN/A$1.29B$7.791.18
Ero Copper$785.80M3.58$263.72M$2.819.61

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ero Copper has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Ero Copper has a consensus target price of $31.50, suggesting a potential upside of 16.65%. Given Ero Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ero Copper is more favorable than Lithium Americas (Argentina).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas (Argentina)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ero Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

49.2% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.3% of Ero Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 19.8% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ero Copper had 2 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas (Argentina). MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ero Copper and 0 mentions for Lithium Americas (Argentina). Ero Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Ero Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Neutral
Ero Copper Neutral

Summary

Ero Copper beats Lithium Americas (Argentina) on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lithium Americas (Argentina) News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LAAC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LAAC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LAAC vs. The Competition

MetricLithium Americas (Argentina)Metal mining IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.49B$3.98B$4.78B$23.07B
Dividend YieldN/A3.22%5.02%4.09%
P/E Ratio1.1822.9622.8930.66
Price / SalesN/A191.656,745.9224.56
Price / Cash14.9513.4127.2125.15
Price / Book1.782.996.664.73
Net Income$1.29B$246.92M$156.96M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-7.73%-2.82%-1.40%1.95%
1 Month Performance-0.33%-5.20%-1.09%0.85%
1 Year Performance404.95%78.28%73.08%28.44%

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LAAC
Lithium Americas (Argentina)
N/A$9.19
-3.7%
N/A+424.2%$1.49BN/A1.18850
AUGO
Aura Minerals
2.5564 of 5 stars
$72.16
-4.6%
$67.60
-6.3%
N/A$6.05B$921.73M66.811,462
KNF
Knife River
3.5417 of 5 stars
$69.89
-6.2%
$98.00
+40.2%
-25.1%$3.97B$3.15B27.205,298
LEU
Centrus Energy
3.8693 of 5 stars
$170.56
-1.4%
$268.18
+57.2%
+92.4%$3.35B$448.70M56.48280
TTAM
Titan America
4.5021 of 5 stars
$15.30
-1.0%
$17.42
+13.8%
+9.5%$2.82B$1.66B15.152,554

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:LAAC) was last updated on 5/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners