Free Trial
→ Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside) (From InvestorPlace) (Ad)tc pixel Free LAAC Stock Alerts

Lithium Americas (Argentina) (LAAC) Competitors

Lithium Americas (Argentina) logo
$9.00 +0.90 (+11.11%)
As of 06/11/2026
Compare

LAAC vs. AUGO, KNF, LEU, TTAM, and ERO

Should you buy Lithium Americas (Argentina) stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Lithium Americas (Argentina) with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Lithium Americas (Argentina) include Aura Minerals (AUGO), Knife River (KNF), Centrus Energy (LEU), Titan America (TTAM), and Ero Copper (ERO). These companies are all part of the "non-metallic and industrial metal mining" industry.

How does Lithium Americas (Argentina) compare to Aura Minerals?

Lithium Americas (Argentina) (NYSE:LAAC) and Aura Minerals (NASDAQ:AUGO) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aura Minerals. Lithium Americas (Argentina) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aura Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/AN/A$1.29B$7.791.16
Aura Minerals$921.73M5.54-$79.34M$1.0856.38

Aura Minerals has a net margin of 7.80% compared to Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s net margin of 0.00%. Aura Minerals' return on equity of 111.96% beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/A -1.37% -1.08%
Aura Minerals 7.80%111.96%19.71%

49.2% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by institutional investors. 19.8% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Aura Minerals has a consensus price target of $67.60, indicating a potential upside of 11.02%. Given Aura Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Aura Minerals is more favorable than Lithium Americas (Argentina).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas (Argentina)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Aura Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

In the previous week, Aura Minerals had 3 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas (Argentina). MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Aura Minerals and 0 mentions for Lithium Americas (Argentina). Aura Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Aura Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Neutral
Aura Minerals Positive

Summary

Aura Minerals beats Lithium Americas (Argentina) on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas (Argentina) compare to Knife River?

Lithium Americas (Argentina) (NYSE:LAAC) and Knife River (NYSE:KNF) are both non-metallic and industrial metal mining companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Knife River has a beta of 0.4, meaning that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

49.2% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.1% of Knife River shares are held by institutional investors. 19.8% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Knife River shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Knife River'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Neutral
Knife River Neutral

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Knife River. Lithium Americas (Argentina) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Knife River, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/AN/A$1.29B$7.791.16
Knife River$3.15B1.39$157.07M$2.5729.91

Knife River has a consensus target price of $97.29, indicating a potential upside of 26.56%. Given Knife River's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Knife River is more favorable than Lithium Americas (Argentina).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas (Argentina)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Knife River
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Knife River has a net margin of 4.58% compared to Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s net margin of 0.00%. Knife River's return on equity of 9.35% beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/A -1.37% -1.08%
Knife River 4.58%9.35%3.96%

Summary

Knife River beats Lithium Americas (Argentina) on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas (Argentina) compare to Centrus Energy?

Centrus Energy (NYSE:LEU) and Lithium Americas (Argentina) (NYSE:LAAC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

Centrus Energy has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lithium Americas (Argentina) has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Centrus Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas (Argentina). MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Centrus Energy and 0 mentions for Lithium Americas (Argentina). Centrus Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Centrus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Centrus Energy Positive
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Neutral

Centrus Energy presently has a consensus price target of $268.18, indicating a potential upside of 64.80%. Given Centrus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Centrus Energy is more favorable than Lithium Americas (Argentina).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Centrus Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Lithium Americas (Argentina)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Centrus Energy. Lithium Americas (Argentina) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centrus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Centrus Energy$448.70M7.13$77.80M$3.0253.88
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/AN/A$1.29B$7.791.16

Centrus Energy has a net margin of 13.40% compared to Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s net margin of 0.00%. Centrus Energy's return on equity of 13.10% beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Centrus Energy13.40% 13.10% 3.51%
Lithium Americas (Argentina) N/A -1.37%-1.08%

50.0% of Centrus Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.2% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Centrus Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.8% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Centrus Energy beats Lithium Americas (Argentina) on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas (Argentina) compare to Titan America?

Titan America (NYSE:TTAM) and Lithium Americas (Argentina) (NYSE:LAAC) are both non-metallic and industrial metal mining companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Titan America has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lithium Americas (Argentina) has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Titan America. Lithium Americas (Argentina) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Titan America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Titan America$1.66B1.84$185.44M$1.0116.45
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/AN/A$1.29B$7.791.16

Titan America has a net margin of 11.08% compared to Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s net margin of 0.00%. Titan America's return on equity of 18.35% beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Titan America11.08% 18.35% 9.91%
Lithium Americas (Argentina) N/A -1.37%-1.08%

Titan America currently has a consensus target price of $17.42, indicating a potential upside of 4.86%. Given Titan America's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Titan America is more favorable than Lithium Americas (Argentina).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Titan America
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14
Lithium Americas (Argentina)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

49.2% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by institutional investors. 19.8% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Titan America's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lithium Americas (Argentina)'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Titan America Neutral
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Neutral

Summary

Titan America beats Lithium Americas (Argentina) on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas (Argentina) compare to Ero Copper?

Lithium Americas (Argentina) (NYSE:LAAC) and Ero Copper (NYSE:ERO) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

49.2% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.3% of Ero Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 19.8% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ero Copper has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Ero Copper has a net margin of 31.63% compared to Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s net margin of 0.00%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 27.33% beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/A -1.37% -1.08%
Ero Copper 31.63%27.33%13.47%

In the previous week, Ero Copper had 3 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas (Argentina). MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Ero Copper and 0 mentions for Lithium Americas (Argentina). Ero Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Ero Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Neutral
Ero Copper Positive

Ero Copper has a consensus price target of $31.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7.18%. Given Ero Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ero Copper is more favorable than Lithium Americas (Argentina).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas (Argentina)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ero Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

Lithium Americas (Argentina) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ero Copper. Lithium Americas (Argentina) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium Americas (Argentina)N/AN/A$1.29B$7.791.16
Ero Copper$785.80M3.90$263.72M$2.8110.46

Summary

Ero Copper beats Lithium Americas (Argentina) on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lithium Americas (Argentina) News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LAAC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LAAC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LAAC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricLithium Americas (Argentina)Metal mining IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.46B$3.98B$4.76B$23.15B
Dividend YieldN/A3.22%5.00%4.08%
P/E Ratio1.1622.4323.2331.33
Price / SalesN/A191.596,087.0120.48
Price / Cash14.9513.4226.8424.24
Price / Book1.742.749.064.68
Net Income$1.29B$246.92M$156.92M$1.07B
7 Day Performance4.29%0.52%0.25%2.11%
1 Month Performance-21.19%-13.46%-6.08%2.32%
1 Year Performance345.54%60.01%57.51%24.12%

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LAAC
Lithium Americas (Argentina)
N/A$9.00
+11.1%		N/A+347.8%$1.46BN/A1.16850
AUGO
Aura Minerals
3.9699 of 5 stars		$57.05
-2.8%		$67.60
+18.5%		N/A$4.78B$921.73M52.821,462
KNF
Knife River
3.1311 of 5 stars		$76.24
+5.6%		$97.29
+27.6%		-9.7%$4.33B$3.15B29.665,298
LEU
Centrus Energy
3.4777 of 5 stars		$156.47
-4.4%		$268.18
+71.4%		+2.7%$3.08B$448.70M51.81280
TTAM
Titan America
2.9402 of 5 stars		$15.82
+2.9%		$17.42
+10.1%		+24.7%$2.92B$1.66B15.662,554

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:LAAC) was last updated on 6/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Hey, it's Jon Najarian. The SpaceX IPO is right around the corner. But I discovered Elon may have something BIGGER planned. Check this out before June 9th...
After being invited to the SpaceX launch headquarters in Cape Canaveral from one of Elon's top lobbyists… Hall...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
From the man who predicted 2008 crash…
Porter Stansberry, founder of one of the largest financial research firms in the world, says he's breaking the...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
"Golden Dawn": the code name that should be on every investor's radar
Trump's team has officially code-named America's new AI initiative 'Golden Dawn' - a government project involv...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX is chump change compared to Elon’s $20T ‘iPhone’
Early Apple investors saw peak gains as high as 7,537% after the iPhone launched. Now, multiple insider source...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel