NYSE:IPI

Intrepid Potash Competitors

$29.46
-0.97 (-3.19 %)
(As of 04/19/2021 02:07 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$29.00
Now: $29.46
$30.44
50-Day Range
$29.40
MA: $32.53
$37.85
52-Week Range
$7.60
Now: $29.46
$39.19
Volume1,203 shs
Average Volume215,593 shs
Market Capitalization$396.30 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.26

Competitors

Intrepid Potash (NYSE:IPI) Vs. VMC, MLM, SQM, TECK, MDU, and HL

Should you be buying IPI stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals, except fuels" are considered alternatives and competitors to Intrepid Potash, including Vulcan Materials (VMC), Martin Marietta Materials (MLM), Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile (SQM), Teck Resources (TECK), MDU Resources Group (MDU), and Hecla Mining (HL).

Intrepid Potash (NYSE:IPI) and Vulcan Materials (NYSE:VMC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

30.8% of Intrepid Potash shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.8% of Vulcan Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 26.4% of Intrepid Potash shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Vulcan Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Intrepid Potash and Vulcan Materials, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Intrepid Potash11102.00
Vulcan Materials014602.30

Intrepid Potash currently has a consensus price target of $22.8667, indicating a potential downside of 21.93%. Vulcan Materials has a consensus price target of $147.0556, indicating a potential downside of 16.45%. Given Vulcan Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Vulcan Materials is more favorable than Intrepid Potash.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Intrepid Potash and Vulcan Materials' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intrepid Potash$220.07 million1.80$13.63 million$1.0029.46
Vulcan Materials$4.93 billion4.74$617.66 million$4.7037.46

Vulcan Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Intrepid Potash. Intrepid Potash is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vulcan Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Intrepid Potash and Vulcan Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Intrepid Potash-12.34%-4.43%-3.27%
Vulcan Materials12.55%10.97%5.67%

Risk & Volatility

Intrepid Potash has a beta of 2.26, suggesting that its stock price is 126% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vulcan Materials has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Vulcan Materials beats Intrepid Potash on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Martin Marietta Materials (NYSE:MLM) and Intrepid Potash (NYSE:IPI) are both construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Martin Marietta Materials and Intrepid Potash's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Martin Marietta Materials14.38%12.22%6.48%
Intrepid Potash-12.34%-4.43%-3.27%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Martin Marietta Materials and Intrepid Potash, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Martin Marietta Materials010902.47
Intrepid Potash11102.00

Martin Marietta Materials currently has a consensus target price of $280.2222, indicating a potential downside of 19.90%. Intrepid Potash has a consensus target price of $22.8667, indicating a potential downside of 21.93%. Given Martin Marietta Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Martin Marietta Materials is more favorable than Intrepid Potash.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.8% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.8% of Intrepid Potash shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.4% of Intrepid Potash shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Martin Marietta Materials and Intrepid Potash's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Martin Marietta Materials$4.74 billion4.60$611.90 million$9.7435.91
Intrepid Potash$220.07 million1.80$13.63 million$1.0029.46

Martin Marietta Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Intrepid Potash. Intrepid Potash is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Martin Marietta Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrepid Potash has a beta of 2.26, meaning that its stock price is 126% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Martin Marietta Materials beats Intrepid Potash on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile (NYSE:SQM) and Intrepid Potash (NYSE:IPI) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile and Intrepid Potash, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile10402.60
Intrepid Potash11102.00

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile presently has a consensus target price of $53.50, indicating a potential downside of 3.90%. Intrepid Potash has a consensus target price of $22.8667, indicating a potential downside of 21.93%. Given Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile is more favorable than Intrepid Potash.

Profitability

This table compares Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile and Intrepid Potash's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile9.26%9.93%4.36%
Intrepid Potash-12.34%-4.43%-3.27%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile and Intrepid Potash's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile$1.94 billion7.54$278.11 million$1.0652.52
Intrepid Potash$220.07 million1.80$13.63 million$1.0029.46

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile has higher revenue and earnings than Intrepid Potash. Intrepid Potash is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

12.8% of Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.8% of Intrepid Potash shares are held by institutional investors. 26.4% of Intrepid Potash shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrepid Potash has a beta of 2.26, meaning that its share price is 126% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile beats Intrepid Potash on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Teck Resources (NYSE:TECK) and Intrepid Potash (NYSE:IPI) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Teck Resources and Intrepid Potash, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Teck Resources071002.59
Intrepid Potash11102.00

Teck Resources currently has a consensus price target of $25.6667, indicating a potential upside of 15.20%. Intrepid Potash has a consensus price target of $22.8667, indicating a potential downside of 21.93%. Given Teck Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Teck Resources is more favorable than Intrepid Potash.

Profitability

This table compares Teck Resources and Intrepid Potash's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Teck Resources-14.37%2.49%1.38%
Intrepid Potash-12.34%-4.43%-3.27%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Teck Resources and Intrepid Potash's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Teck Resources$8.99 billion1.30$-455,930,000.00$2.2210.05
Intrepid Potash$220.07 million1.80$13.63 million$1.0029.46

Intrepid Potash has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Teck Resources. Teck Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrepid Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

47.1% of Teck Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.8% of Intrepid Potash shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.4% of Intrepid Potash shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Teck Resources has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrepid Potash has a beta of 2.26, indicating that its share price is 126% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Teck Resources beats Intrepid Potash on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

MDU Resources Group (NYSE:MDU) and Intrepid Potash (NYSE:IPI) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

Volatility and Risk

MDU Resources Group has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrepid Potash has a beta of 2.26, indicating that its share price is 126% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares MDU Resources Group and Intrepid Potash's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
MDU Resources Group6.75%12.87%4.73%
Intrepid Potash-12.34%-4.43%-3.27%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

67.4% of MDU Resources Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.8% of Intrepid Potash shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of MDU Resources Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 26.4% of Intrepid Potash shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for MDU Resources Group and Intrepid Potash, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
MDU Resources Group02102.33
Intrepid Potash11102.00

MDU Resources Group currently has a consensus price target of $28.3333, indicating a potential downside of 13.70%. Intrepid Potash has a consensus price target of $22.8667, indicating a potential downside of 21.93%. Given MDU Resources Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MDU Resources Group is more favorable than Intrepid Potash.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares MDU Resources Group and Intrepid Potash's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MDU Resources Group$5.34 billion1.24$335.45 million$1.6919.41
Intrepid Potash$220.07 million1.80$13.63 million$1.0029.46

MDU Resources Group has higher revenue and earnings than Intrepid Potash. MDU Resources Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrepid Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

MDU Resources Group beats Intrepid Potash on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hecla Mining (NYSE:HL) and Intrepid Potash (NYSE:IPI) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Hecla Mining and Intrepid Potash's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hecla Mining$673.27 million4.91$-99,560,000.00($0.13)-47.54
Intrepid Potash$220.07 million1.80$13.63 million$1.0029.46

Intrepid Potash has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hecla Mining. Hecla Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrepid Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

57.0% of Hecla Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.8% of Intrepid Potash shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Hecla Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.4% of Intrepid Potash shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Hecla Mining and Intrepid Potash, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hecla Mining04302.43
Intrepid Potash11102.00

Hecla Mining presently has a consensus target price of $6.2417, indicating a potential upside of 1.00%. Intrepid Potash has a consensus target price of $22.8667, indicating a potential downside of 21.93%. Given Hecla Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Hecla Mining is more favorable than Intrepid Potash.

Profitability

This table compares Hecla Mining and Intrepid Potash's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hecla Mining-3.51%0.95%0.60%
Intrepid Potash-12.34%-4.43%-3.27%

Risk and Volatility

Hecla Mining has a beta of 2.14, suggesting that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrepid Potash has a beta of 2.26, suggesting that its stock price is 126% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Hecla Mining beats Intrepid Potash on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Intrepid Potash Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Vulcan Materials logo
VMC
Vulcan Materials
1.6$176.06-0.2%$23.31 billion$4.93 billion38.36Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Martin Marietta Materials logo
MLM
Martin Marietta Materials
1.8$349.75-0.5%$21.92 billion$4.74 billion32.69Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile logo
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile
1.4$55.67-1.0%$14.50 billion$1.94 billion89.79Increase in Short Interest
Teck Resources logo
TECK
Teck Resources
2.1$22.31-0.4%$11.64 billion$8.99 billion-12.53Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
MDU Resources Group logo
MDU
MDU Resources Group
1.9$32.81-0.1%$6.61 billion$5.34 billion17.64
Hecla Mining logo
HL
Hecla Mining
1.4$6.18-3.2%$3.42 billion$673.27 million-123.60Decrease in Short Interest
Summit Materials logo
SUM
Summit Materials
1.3$29.30-0.5%$3.38 billion$2.22 billion24.42Analyst Report
News Coverage
Compass Minerals International logo
CMP
Compass Minerals International
1.5$66.53-1.2%$2.29 billion$1.49 billion27.72
Piedmont Lithium logo
PLL
Piedmont Lithium
1.1$64.93-0.2%$1.02 billionN/A-95.49
U.S. Silica logo
SLCA
U.S. Silica
1.2$11.97-0.1%$888.70 million$1.47 billion-2.14
United States Lime & Minerals logo
USLM
United States Lime & Minerals
1.0$144.00-1.4%$825.34 million$158.28 million31.30
Ciner Resources logo
CINR
Ciner Resources
0.9$13.09-1.2%$258.74 million$522.80 million15.77
Smart Sand logo
SND
Smart Sand
1.0$2.50-0.4%$108.09 million$233.07 million2.29Analyst Upgrade
This page was last updated on 4/19/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.