Go Pro

CVR Partners (UAN) Competitors

CVR Partners logo
$117.33 -9.24 (-7.30%)
As of 03:56 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

UAN vs. SMG, FMC, LXU, IPI, and CBUS

Should you buy CVR Partners stock or one of its competitors? CVR Partners's main competitors and comparable companies include Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG), FMC (FMC), Lsb Industries (LXU), Intrepid Potash (IPI), and Cibus (CBUS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "fertilizers & agricultural chemicals" industry.

How does CVR Partners compare to Scotts Miracle-Gro?

CVR Partners (NYSE:UAN) and Scotts Miracle-Gro (NYSE:SMG) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

CVR Partners has a net margin of 23.67% compared to Scotts Miracle-Gro's net margin of 2.19%. CVR Partners' return on equity of 51.56% beat Scotts Miracle-Gro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CVR Partners23.67% 51.56% 15.70%
Scotts Miracle-Gro 2.19%-81.90%8.97%

43.8% of CVR Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.1% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of CVR Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 24.4% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Scotts Miracle-Gro had 10 more articles in the media than CVR Partners. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Scotts Miracle-Gro and 2 mentions for CVR Partners. Scotts Miracle-Gro's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat CVR Partners' score of 0.67 indicating that Scotts Miracle-Gro is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CVR Partners
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Scotts Miracle-Gro
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Scotts Miracle-Gro has a consensus target price of $75.40, suggesting a potential upside of 21.83%. Given Scotts Miracle-Gro's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Scotts Miracle-Gro is more favorable than CVR Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CVR Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Scotts Miracle-Gro
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

CVR Partners pays an annual dividend of $24.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 20.7%. Scotts Miracle-Gro pays an annual dividend of $2.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. CVR Partners pays out 160.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Scotts Miracle-Gro pays out 229.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CVR Partners has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CVR Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Scotts Miracle-Gro has higher revenue and earnings than CVR Partners. CVR Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scotts Miracle-Gro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CVR Partners$676.86M1.83$98.66M$15.167.74
Scotts Miracle-Gro$3.41B1.05$145.20M$1.1553.82

CVR Partners has a beta of 0.14, meaning that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Scotts Miracle-Gro has a beta of 1.82, meaning that its share price is 82% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Scotts Miracle-Gro beats CVR Partners on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CVR Partners compare to FMC?

CVR Partners (NYSE:UAN) and FMC (NYSE:FMC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

CVR Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FMC. FMC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CVR Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CVR Partners$676.86M1.83$98.66M$15.167.74
FMC$3.47B0.38-$2.24B-$22.00N/A

In the previous week, FMC had 6 more articles in the media than CVR Partners. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for FMC and 2 mentions for CVR Partners. FMC's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat CVR Partners' score of 0.67 indicating that FMC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CVR Partners
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
FMC
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

43.8% of CVR Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.9% of FMC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of CVR Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of FMC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CVR Partners has a beta of 0.14, suggesting that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FMC has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

CVR Partners pays an annual dividend of $24.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 20.7%. FMC pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. CVR Partners pays out 160.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. FMC pays out -1.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CVR Partners has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CVR Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

CVR Partners has a net margin of 23.67% compared to FMC's net margin of -84.83%. CVR Partners' return on equity of 51.56% beat FMC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CVR Partners23.67% 51.56% 15.70%
FMC -84.83%11.35%2.65%

FMC has a consensus target price of $14.25, indicating a potential upside of 36.76%. Given FMC's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe FMC is more favorable than CVR Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CVR Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
FMC
3 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

CVR Partners beats FMC on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CVR Partners compare to Lsb Industries?

Lsb Industries (NYSE:LXU) and CVR Partners (NYSE:UAN) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and analyst recommendations.

CVR Partners has a net margin of 23.67% compared to Lsb Industries' net margin of 5.58%. CVR Partners' return on equity of 51.56% beat Lsb Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lsb Industries5.58% 6.98% 3.10%
CVR Partners 23.67%51.56%15.70%

Lsb Industries currently has a consensus price target of $14.67, suggesting a potential upside of 45.50%. Given Lsb Industries' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Lsb Industries is more favorable than CVR Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lsb Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
CVR Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

CVR Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Lsb Industries. CVR Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lsb Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lsb Industries$615.21M1.18$24.61M$0.5020.16
CVR Partners$676.86M1.83$98.66M$15.167.74

In the previous week, Lsb Industries had 1 more articles in the media than CVR Partners. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Lsb Industries and 2 mentions for CVR Partners. Lsb Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat CVR Partners' score of 0.67 indicating that Lsb Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lsb Industries
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CVR Partners
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

73.7% of Lsb Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.8% of CVR Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of Lsb Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of CVR Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lsb Industries has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CVR Partners has a beta of 0.14, indicating that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

CVR Partners beats Lsb Industries on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CVR Partners compare to Intrepid Potash?

Intrepid Potash (NYSE:IPI) and CVR Partners (NYSE:UAN) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Intrepid Potash has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CVR Partners has a beta of 0.14, suggesting that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

CVR Partners has a net margin of 23.67% compared to Intrepid Potash's net margin of 8.94%. CVR Partners' return on equity of 51.56% beat Intrepid Potash's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intrepid Potash8.94% 4.74% 3.73%
CVR Partners 23.67%51.56%15.70%

56.1% of Intrepid Potash shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.8% of CVR Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Intrepid Potash shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of CVR Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CVR Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Intrepid Potash. CVR Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrepid Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intrepid Potash$298.33M1.70$11.19M$1.9818.99
CVR Partners$676.86M1.83$98.66M$15.167.74

Intrepid Potash currently has a consensus target price of $26.00, suggesting a potential downside of 30.85%. Given Intrepid Potash's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Intrepid Potash is more favorable than CVR Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intrepid Potash
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
CVR Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Intrepid Potash had 6 more articles in the media than CVR Partners. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Intrepid Potash and 2 mentions for CVR Partners. CVR Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Intrepid Potash's score of 0.59 indicating that CVR Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Intrepid Potash
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CVR Partners
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

CVR Partners beats Intrepid Potash on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CVR Partners compare to Cibus?

Cibus (NASDAQ:CBUS) and CVR Partners (NYSE:UAN) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Cibus currently has a consensus target price of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 371.20%. Given Cibus' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Cibus is more favorable than CVR Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cibus
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
CVR Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

CVR Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Cibus. Cibus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CVR Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cibus$3.64M40.05-$127.08M-$1.97N/A
CVR Partners$676.86M1.83$98.66M$15.167.74

In the previous week, Cibus and Cibus both had 2 articles in the media. CVR Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Cibus' score of 0.00 indicating that CVR Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cibus
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CVR Partners
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Cibus has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CVR Partners has a beta of 0.14, suggesting that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

CVR Partners has a net margin of 23.67% compared to Cibus' net margin of -2,366.33%. CVR Partners' return on equity of 51.56% beat Cibus' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cibus-2,366.33% -200.87% -28.28%
CVR Partners 23.67%51.56%15.70%

33.8% of Cibus shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.8% of CVR Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.9% of Cibus shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of CVR Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CVR Partners beats Cibus on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CVR Partners News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for UAN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding UAN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

UAN vs. The Competition

MetricCVR PartnersChemicals IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.24B$11.41B$4.91B$24.19B
Dividend Yield12.65%2.81%4.69%3.69%
P/E Ratio7.7420.8121.3529.08
Price / Sales1.8352.605,152.4313.90
Price / Cash7.3815.5224.6319.37
Price / Book4.673.718.884.91
Net Income$98.66M$223.51M$154.60M$1.06B
7 Day Performance-6.52%2.45%7.67%1.30%
1 Month Performance1.18%3.48%5.97%2.29%
1 Year Performance21.41%22.45%44.54%19.89%

CVR Partners Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
UAN
CVR Partners
2.5808 of 5 stars
$117.33
-7.3%
N/A+32.2%$1.24B$676.86M7.74300
SMG
Scotts Miracle-Gro
4.2607 of 5 stars
$68.46
+4.2%
$75.40
+10.1%
+7.7%$3.82B$3.41B59.535,900
FMC
FMC
4.1176 of 5 stars
$10.35
-3.4%
$14.25
+37.7%
-70.4%$1.34B$3.47BN/A5,500
LXU
Lsb Industries
4.4068 of 5 stars
$9.79
-10.0%
$14.67
+49.9%
+34.4%$782.70M$615.21M19.57570
IPI
Intrepid Potash
2.1516 of 5 stars
$33.18
-2.3%
$26.00
-21.6%
+22.0%$456.19M$298.33M31.30440

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:UAN) was last updated on 8/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners