Free Trial

PureCycle Technologies (PCT) Competitors

PureCycle Technologies logo
$12.30 -0.09 (-0.74%)
As of 09:54 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PCT vs. ICL, AXTA, PRM, MEOH, and CSW

Should you buy PureCycle Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares PureCycle Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with PureCycle Technologies include ICL Group (ICL), Axalta Coating Systems (AXTA), Perimeter Solutions (PRM), Methanex (MEOH), and CSW Industrials (CSW). These companies are all part of the "chemicals" industry.

How does PureCycle Technologies compare to ICL Group?

PureCycle Technologies (NASDAQ:PCT) and ICL Group (NYSE:ICL) are both mid-cap chemicals companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

63.0% of PureCycle Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of ICL Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.8% of PureCycle Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 2.48, meaning that its share price is 148% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ICL Group has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

PureCycle Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.31%. ICL Group has a consensus price target of $6.60, suggesting a potential upside of 1.15%. Given ICL Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ICL Group is more favorable than PureCycle Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PureCycle Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
ICL Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

ICL Group has a net margin of 3.52% compared to PureCycle Technologies' net margin of -2,062.36%. ICL Group's return on equity of 7.84% beat PureCycle Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PureCycle Technologies-2,062.36% -393.01% -22.56%
ICL Group 3.52%7.84%3.95%

ICL Group has higher revenue and earnings than PureCycle Technologies. PureCycle Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ICL Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PureCycle Technologies$8.35M268.82-$182.57M-$1.47N/A
ICL Group$7.15B1.18$226M$0.2032.63

In the previous week, PureCycle Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than ICL Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PureCycle Technologies and 2 mentions for ICL Group. PureCycle Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat ICL Group's score of 0.00 indicating that PureCycle Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PureCycle Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ICL Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

PureCycle Technologies beats ICL Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PureCycle Technologies compare to Axalta Coating Systems?

Axalta Coating Systems (NYSE:AXTA) and PureCycle Technologies (NASDAQ:PCT) are both mid-cap chemicals companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

Axalta Coating Systems presently has a consensus price target of $34.15, indicating a potential upside of 14.83%. PureCycle Technologies has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential downside of 3.31%. Given Axalta Coating Systems' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Axalta Coating Systems is more favorable than PureCycle Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Axalta Coating Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
PureCycle Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Axalta Coating Systems has a net margin of 7.22% compared to PureCycle Technologies' net margin of -2,062.36%. Axalta Coating Systems' return on equity of 22.37% beat PureCycle Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Axalta Coating Systems7.22% 22.37% 6.92%
PureCycle Technologies -2,062.36%-393.01%-22.56%

Axalta Coating Systems has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 2.48, indicating that its stock price is 148% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, PureCycle Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Axalta Coating Systems. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PureCycle Technologies and 3 mentions for Axalta Coating Systems. Axalta Coating Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat PureCycle Technologies' score of 0.39 indicating that Axalta Coating Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Axalta Coating Systems
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PureCycle Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

98.3% of Axalta Coating Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.0% of PureCycle Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Axalta Coating Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.8% of PureCycle Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Axalta Coating Systems has higher revenue and earnings than PureCycle Technologies. PureCycle Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Axalta Coating Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Axalta Coating Systems$5.12B1.24$378M$1.7117.39
PureCycle Technologies$8.35M268.82-$182.57M-$1.47N/A

Summary

Axalta Coating Systems beats PureCycle Technologies on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PureCycle Technologies compare to Perimeter Solutions?

Perimeter Solutions (NYSE:PRM) and PureCycle Technologies (NASDAQ:PCT) are both mid-cap chemicals companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Perimeter Solutions currently has a consensus target price of $37.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.09%. PureCycle Technologies has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.31%. Given Perimeter Solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Perimeter Solutions is more favorable than PureCycle Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Perimeter Solutions
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
PureCycle Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Perimeter Solutions has a beta of 1.92, indicating that its share price is 92% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 2.48, indicating that its share price is 148% more volatile than the broader market.

89.9% of Perimeter Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.0% of PureCycle Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 13.1% of Perimeter Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.8% of PureCycle Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Perimeter Solutions has a net margin of -26.93% compared to PureCycle Technologies' net margin of -2,062.36%. Perimeter Solutions' return on equity of 18.29% beat PureCycle Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Perimeter Solutions-26.93% 18.29% 7.73%
PureCycle Technologies -2,062.36%-393.01%-22.56%

In the previous week, PureCycle Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Perimeter Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PureCycle Technologies and 2 mentions for Perimeter Solutions. Perimeter Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat PureCycle Technologies' score of 0.39 indicating that Perimeter Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Perimeter Solutions
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PureCycle Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

PureCycle Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Perimeter Solutions. Perimeter Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PureCycle Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Perimeter Solutions$652.86M8.03-$206.37M-$1.34N/A
PureCycle Technologies$8.35M268.82-$182.57M-$1.47N/A

Summary

Perimeter Solutions beats PureCycle Technologies on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PureCycle Technologies compare to Methanex?

Methanex (NASDAQ:MEOH) and PureCycle Technologies (NASDAQ:PCT) are both mid-cap chemicals companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

73.5% of Methanex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.0% of PureCycle Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Methanex shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.8% of PureCycle Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Methanex currently has a consensus target price of $66.78, indicating a potential upside of 9.57%. PureCycle Technologies has a consensus target price of $12.00, indicating a potential downside of 3.31%. Given Methanex's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Methanex is more favorable than PureCycle Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Methanex
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.64
PureCycle Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Methanex has higher revenue and earnings than PureCycle Technologies. Methanex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PureCycle Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Methanex$3.59B1.31$79.88M-$0.49N/A
PureCycle Technologies$8.35M268.82-$182.57M-$1.47N/A

Methanex has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 2.48, indicating that its stock price is 148% more volatile than the broader market.

Methanex has a net margin of -1.25% compared to PureCycle Technologies' net margin of -2,062.36%. Methanex's return on equity of 2.96% beat PureCycle Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Methanex-1.25% 2.96% 1.12%
PureCycle Technologies -2,062.36%-393.01%-22.56%

In the previous week, PureCycle Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than Methanex. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PureCycle Technologies and 4 mentions for Methanex. Methanex's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat PureCycle Technologies' score of 0.39 indicating that Methanex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Methanex
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PureCycle Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Methanex beats PureCycle Technologies on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PureCycle Technologies compare to CSW Industrials?

PureCycle Technologies (NASDAQ:PCT) and CSW Industrials (NYSE:CSW) are both mid-cap chemicals companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, CSW Industrials had 14 more articles in the media than PureCycle Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for CSW Industrials and 6 mentions for PureCycle Technologies. CSW Industrials' average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat PureCycle Technologies' score of 0.39 indicating that CSW Industrials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PureCycle Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CSW Industrials
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

PureCycle Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.31%. CSW Industrials has a consensus price target of $328.57, suggesting a potential upside of 20.49%. Given CSW Industrials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CSW Industrials is more favorable than PureCycle Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PureCycle Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
CSW Industrials
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

CSW Industrials has higher revenue and earnings than PureCycle Technologies. PureCycle Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CSW Industrials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PureCycle Technologies$8.35M268.82-$182.57M-$1.47N/A
CSW Industrials$1.08B4.11$112.04M$6.6840.82

PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 2.48, indicating that its share price is 148% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CSW Industrials has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

63.0% of PureCycle Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.8% of CSW Industrials shares are held by institutional investors. 18.8% of PureCycle Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of CSW Industrials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CSW Industrials has a net margin of 10.35% compared to PureCycle Technologies' net margin of -2,062.36%. CSW Industrials' return on equity of 15.91% beat PureCycle Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PureCycle Technologies-2,062.36% -393.01% -22.56%
CSW Industrials 10.35%15.91%9.05%

Summary

CSW Industrials beats PureCycle Technologies on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PureCycle Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PCT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PCT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PCT vs. The Competition

MetricPureCycle TechnologiesWaste Removal Svcs IndustryBusiness SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$2.24B$9.61B$6.76B$12.57B
Dividend YieldN/A1.13%3.01%5.31%
P/E Ratio-8.4365.8928.6826.27
Price / Sales268.8236.04426.90114.93
Price / CashN/A12.7423.1237.60
Price / Book49.645.605.946.86
Net Income-$182.57M$387.83M$205.48M$337.26M
7 Day Performance9.64%-3.54%3.58%3.53%
1 Month PerformanceN/AN/A-4.25%-0.79%
1 Year Performance31.75%-6.29%41.40%39.66%

PureCycle Technologies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PCT
PureCycle Technologies
1.2142 of 5 stars
$12.41
+0.2%
$12.00
-3.3%
+31.5%$2.24B$8.35MN/A120
ICL
ICL Group
1.3807 of 5 stars
$6.43
+0.3%
$6.60
+2.6%
+0.3%$8.27B$7.15B32.1513,007
AXTA
Axalta Coating Systems
2.6967 of 5 stars
$27.58
+2.9%
$34.15
+23.8%
+0.2%$5.74B$5.12B16.1312,300
PRM
Perimeter Solutions
3.019 of 5 stars
$33.42
+0.6%
$37.00
+10.7%
+167.7%$5.42B$652.86MN/A240
MEOH
Methanex
2.6232 of 5 stars
$62.09
-2.0%
$66.78
+7.5%
+81.6%$4.90B$3.67BN/A1,649

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PCT) was last updated on 6/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners