Go Pro

PureCycle Technologies (PCT) Competitors

PureCycle Technologies logo
$7.30 -0.16 (-2.14%)
Closing price 07/10/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$7.43 +0.13 (+1.75%)
As of 07/10/2026 07:55 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PCT vs. CSW, MEOH, AVNT, CC, and NGVT

Should you buy PureCycle Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares PureCycle Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with PureCycle Technologies include CSW Industrials (CSW), Methanex (MEOH), Avient (AVNT), Chemours (CC), and Ingevity (NGVT). These companies are all part of the "chemicals" industry.

How does PureCycle Technologies compare to CSW Industrials?

CSW Industrials (NYSE:CSW) and PureCycle Technologies (NASDAQ:PCT) are both chemicals companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

CSW Industrials has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 2.5, suggesting that its share price is 150% more volatile than the broader market.

CSW Industrials has higher revenue and earnings than PureCycle Technologies. PureCycle Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CSW Industrials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CSW Industrials$1.08B4.24$112.04M$6.6842.14
PureCycle Technologies$8.35M158.12-$182.57M-$1.47N/A

In the previous week, CSW Industrials had 1 more articles in the media than PureCycle Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CSW Industrials and 2 mentions for PureCycle Technologies. PureCycle Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat CSW Industrials' score of 0.67 indicating that PureCycle Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CSW Industrials
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PureCycle Technologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

CSW Industrials has a net margin of 10.35% compared to PureCycle Technologies' net margin of -2,062.36%. CSW Industrials' return on equity of 15.91% beat PureCycle Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CSW Industrials10.35% 15.91% 9.05%
PureCycle Technologies -2,062.36%-393.01%-22.56%

82.8% of CSW Industrials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.0% of PureCycle Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of CSW Industrials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.8% of PureCycle Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CSW Industrials presently has a consensus target price of $330.43, indicating a potential upside of 17.38%. PureCycle Technologies has a consensus target price of $12.25, indicating a potential upside of 67.81%. Given PureCycle Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe PureCycle Technologies is more favorable than CSW Industrials.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CSW Industrials
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78
PureCycle Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

CSW Industrials beats PureCycle Technologies on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PureCycle Technologies compare to Methanex?

Methanex (NASDAQ:MEOH) and PureCycle Technologies (NASDAQ:PCT) are both chemicals companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

73.5% of Methanex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.0% of PureCycle Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Methanex shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.8% of PureCycle Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Methanex presently has a consensus target price of $66.22, indicating a potential upside of 36.09%. PureCycle Technologies has a consensus target price of $12.25, indicating a potential upside of 67.81%. Given PureCycle Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PureCycle Technologies is more favorable than Methanex.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Methanex
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45
PureCycle Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Methanex has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 2.5, indicating that its stock price is 150% more volatile than the broader market.

Methanex has higher revenue and earnings than PureCycle Technologies. Methanex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PureCycle Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Methanex$3.59B1.05$79.88M-$0.49N/A
PureCycle Technologies$8.35M158.12-$182.57M-$1.47N/A

In the previous week, Methanex and Methanex both had 2 articles in the media. Methanex's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat PureCycle Technologies' score of 0.94 indicating that Methanex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Methanex
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PureCycle Technologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Methanex has a net margin of -1.25% compared to PureCycle Technologies' net margin of -2,062.36%. Methanex's return on equity of 2.96% beat PureCycle Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Methanex-1.25% 2.96% 1.12%
PureCycle Technologies -2,062.36%-393.01%-22.56%

Summary

Methanex beats PureCycle Technologies on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PureCycle Technologies compare to Avient?

PureCycle Technologies (NASDAQ:PCT) and Avient (NYSE:AVNT) are both chemicals companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Avient has higher revenue and earnings than PureCycle Technologies. PureCycle Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PureCycle Technologies$8.35M158.12-$182.57M-$1.47N/A
Avient$3.26B1.01$81.90M$1.7220.96

63.0% of PureCycle Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Avient shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.8% of PureCycle Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Avient shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Avient had 1 more articles in the media than PureCycle Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Avient and 2 mentions for PureCycle Technologies. PureCycle Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Avient's score of 0.61 indicating that PureCycle Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PureCycle Technologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Avient
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 2.5, meaning that its stock price is 150% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avient has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Avient has a net margin of 4.81% compared to PureCycle Technologies' net margin of -2,062.36%. Avient's return on equity of 11.11% beat PureCycle Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PureCycle Technologies-2,062.36% -393.01% -22.56%
Avient 4.81%11.11%4.40%

PureCycle Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $12.25, indicating a potential upside of 67.81%. Avient has a consensus target price of $45.71, indicating a potential upside of 26.78%. Given PureCycle Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe PureCycle Technologies is more favorable than Avient.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PureCycle Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Avient
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Summary

Avient beats PureCycle Technologies on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PureCycle Technologies compare to Chemours?

PureCycle Technologies (NASDAQ:PCT) and Chemours (NYSE:CC) are both chemicals companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

PureCycle Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chemours. Chemours is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PureCycle Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PureCycle Technologies$8.35M158.12-$182.57M-$1.47N/A
Chemours$5.81B0.46-$386M-$2.64N/A

PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 2.5, meaning that its share price is 150% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chemours has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

PureCycle Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $12.25, suggesting a potential upside of 67.81%. Chemours has a consensus target price of $24.10, suggesting a potential upside of 35.33%. Given PureCycle Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe PureCycle Technologies is more favorable than Chemours.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PureCycle Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Chemours
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42

In the previous week, Chemours had 1 more articles in the media than PureCycle Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Chemours and 2 mentions for PureCycle Technologies. PureCycle Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Chemours' score of 0.89 indicating that PureCycle Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PureCycle Technologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Chemours
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

63.0% of PureCycle Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.3% of Chemours shares are held by institutional investors. 18.8% of PureCycle Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Chemours shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Chemours has a net margin of -6.82% compared to PureCycle Technologies' net margin of -2,062.36%. Chemours' return on equity of 52.49% beat PureCycle Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PureCycle Technologies-2,062.36% -393.01% -22.56%
Chemours -6.82%52.49%1.78%

Summary

PureCycle Technologies beats Chemours on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PureCycle Technologies compare to Ingevity?

Ingevity (NYSE:NGVT) and PureCycle Technologies (NASDAQ:PCT) are both chemicals companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

Ingevity has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 2.5, meaning that its stock price is 150% more volatile than the broader market.

Ingevity has higher revenue and earnings than PureCycle Technologies. Ingevity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PureCycle Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ingevity$1.18B2.13-$167.10M-$3.55N/A
PureCycle Technologies$8.35M158.12-$182.57M-$1.47N/A

In the previous week, PureCycle Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than Ingevity. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for PureCycle Technologies and 0 mentions for Ingevity. Ingevity's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat PureCycle Technologies' score of 0.94 indicating that Ingevity is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ingevity Positive
PureCycle Technologies Positive

Ingevity presently has a consensus target price of $80.00, indicating a potential upside of 10.69%. PureCycle Technologies has a consensus target price of $12.25, indicating a potential upside of 67.81%. Given PureCycle Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PureCycle Technologies is more favorable than Ingevity.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ingevity
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
PureCycle Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Ingevity has a net margin of -10.55% compared to PureCycle Technologies' net margin of -2,062.36%. Ingevity's return on equity of 207.82% beat PureCycle Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ingevity-10.55% 207.82% 9.70%
PureCycle Technologies -2,062.36%-393.01%-22.56%

91.6% of Ingevity shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.0% of PureCycle Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Ingevity shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.8% of PureCycle Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

PureCycle Technologies beats Ingevity on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PureCycle Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PCT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PCT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PCT vs. The Competition

MetricPureCycle TechnologiesWaste Removal Svcs IndustryBusiness SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.32B$10.54B$6.91B$12.66B
Dividend YieldN/A1.04%3.12%8.00%
P/E Ratio-4.9780.6229.2724.53
Price / Sales158.1225.11347.5296.17
Price / CashN/A13.9623.4760.03
Price / Book29.204.915.746.38
Net Income-$182.57M$387.83M$204.80M$331.87M
7 Day Performance-4.07%-1.32%-1.41%0.37%
1 Month Performance-17.79%-3.36%1.46%0.59%
1 Year Performance-52.13%-5.86%16.36%22.26%

PureCycle Technologies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PCT
PureCycle Technologies
2.2988 of 5 stars
$7.30
-2.1%
$12.25
+67.8%
-52.1%$1.32B$8.35MN/A120
CSW
CSW Industrials
3.3868 of 5 stars
$280.36
+1.5%
$330.43
+17.9%
-7.8%$4.51B$1.08B41.972,700
MEOH
Methanex
3.7836 of 5 stars
$43.82
-3.6%
$66.22
+51.1%
+44.9%$3.52B$3.59BN/A1,649
AVNT
Avient
4.5794 of 5 stars
$38.79
+4.0%
$45.71
+17.9%
+5.5%$3.42B$3.26B22.559,000
CC
Chemours
4.3757 of 5 stars
$18.19
-4.3%
$24.10
+32.5%
+29.0%$2.86B$5.81BN/A5,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PCT) was last updated on 7/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners