NASDAQ:GURE

Gulf Resources Competitors

$6.45

+0.34 (+5.56 %)

(As of 05/14/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$6.11

▼

$6.50

50-Day Range

$4.18

▼

$6.86

52-Week Range

$3.80

▼

$7.09

Volume37,930 shs

Average Volume158,651 shs

Market Capitalization$64.49 million

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta0.44

Gulf Resources (NASDAQ:GURE) Vs. FMC, OLN, HUN, CC, ASH, and GRA

Should you be buying GURE stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "chemicals & allied products" are considered alternatives and competitors to Gulf Resources, including FMC (FMC), Olin (OLN), Huntsman (HUN), The Chemours (CC), Ashland Global (ASH), and W. R. Grace & Co. (GRA).

Gulf Resources vs. FMC Stock

FMC (NYSE:FMC) and Gulf Resources (NASDAQ:GURE) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares FMC and Gulf Resources' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FMC	$4.61 billion	3.30	$477.40 million	$6.09	19.41
Gulf Resources	$10.60 million	6.08	$-25,800,000.00	N/A	N/A

FMC has higher revenue and earnings than Gulf Resources.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for FMC and Gulf Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FMC	0	5	9	0	2.64
Gulf Resources	0	0	0	0	N/A

FMC presently has a consensus target price of $130.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.99%. Given FMC's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe FMC is more favorable than Gulf Resources.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

87.4% of FMC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.0% of Gulf Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of FMC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 30.8% of Gulf Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares FMC and Gulf Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FMC	10.64%	30.81%	8.57%
Gulf Resources	-96.50%	-6.12%	-5.81%

Volatility & Risk

FMC has a beta of 1, indicating that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Gulf Resources has a beta of 0.44, indicating that its share price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

FMC beats Gulf Resources on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gulf Resources vs. Olin Stock

Gulf Resources (NASDAQ:GURE) and Olin (NYSE:OLN) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Gulf Resources and Olin's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gulf Resources	-96.50%	-6.12%	-5.81%
Olin	-18.47%	-9.98%	-2.34%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

6.0% of Gulf Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.7% of Olin shares are held by institutional investors. 30.8% of Gulf Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.7% of Olin shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Gulf Resources and Olin's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gulf Resources	$10.60 million	6.08	$-25,800,000.00	N/A	N/A
Olin	$6.11 billion	1.22	$-11,300,000.00	$0.60	77.98

Olin has higher revenue and earnings than Gulf Resources.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Gulf Resources and Olin, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gulf Resources	0	0	0	0	N/A
Olin	0	4	9	0	2.69

Olin has a consensus price target of $43.1538, indicating a potential downside of 7.77%. Given Olin's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Olin is more favorable than Gulf Resources.

Risk and Volatility

Gulf Resources has a beta of 0.44, indicating that its share price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Olin has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Olin beats Gulf Resources on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gulf Resources vs. Huntsman Stock

Gulf Resources (NASDAQ:GURE) and Huntsman (NYSE:HUN) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Volatility and Risk

Gulf Resources has a beta of 0.44, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Huntsman has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

6.0% of Gulf Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.3% of Huntsman shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.8% of Gulf Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.4% of Huntsman shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Gulf Resources and Huntsman, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gulf Resources	0	0	0	0	N/A
Huntsman	0	3	12	0	2.80

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $30.6875, indicating a potential upside of 1.99%. Given Huntsman's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Huntsman is more favorable than Gulf Resources.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Gulf Resources and Huntsman's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gulf Resources	$10.60 million	6.08	$-25,800,000.00	N/A	N/A
Huntsman	$6.80 billion	0.98	$562 million	$1.53	19.67

Huntsman has higher revenue and earnings than Gulf Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Gulf Resources and Huntsman's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gulf Resources	-96.50%	-6.12%	-5.81%
Huntsman	16.55%	5.27%	2.06%

Summary

Huntsman beats Gulf Resources on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gulf Resources vs. The Chemours Stock

The Chemours (NYSE:CC) and Gulf Resources (NASDAQ:GURE) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for The Chemours and Gulf Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
The Chemours	0	4	4	0	2.50
Gulf Resources	0	0	0	0	N/A

The Chemours currently has a consensus target price of $31.3750, indicating a potential downside of 6.93%. Given The Chemours' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe The Chemours is more favorable than Gulf Resources.

Volatility & Risk

The Chemours has a beta of 2.3, suggesting that its share price is 130% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gulf Resources has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares The Chemours and Gulf Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
The Chemours	$5.53 billion	1.01	$-52,000,000.00	$2.51	13.43
Gulf Resources	$10.60 million	6.08	$-25,800,000.00	N/A	N/A

Gulf Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than The Chemours.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

74.7% of The Chemours shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.0% of Gulf Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of The Chemours shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.8% of Gulf Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares The Chemours and Gulf Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
The Chemours	-2.35%	46.27%	4.51%
Gulf Resources	-96.50%	-6.12%	-5.81%

Summary

The Chemours beats Gulf Resources on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gulf Resources vs. Ashland Global Stock

Gulf Resources (NASDAQ:GURE) and Ashland Global (NYSE:ASH) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Gulf Resources and Ashland Global, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gulf Resources	0	0	0	0	N/A
Ashland Global	1	0	7	0	2.75

Ashland Global has a consensus price target of $92.4444, suggesting a potential upside of 3.80%. Given Ashland Global's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ashland Global is more favorable than Gulf Resources.

Volatility & Risk

Gulf Resources has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ashland Global has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

6.0% of Gulf Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.9% of Ashland Global shares are held by institutional investors. 30.8% of Gulf Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.1% of Ashland Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Gulf Resources and Ashland Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gulf Resources	-96.50%	-6.12%	-5.81%
Ashland Global	-21.84%	5.40%	2.43%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Gulf Resources and Ashland Global's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gulf Resources	$10.60 million	6.08	$-25,800,000.00	N/A	N/A
Ashland Global	$2.33 billion	2.32	$-508,000,000.00	$2.80	31.81

Gulf Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ashland Global.

Summary

Ashland Global beats Gulf Resources on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gulf Resources vs. W. R. Grace & Co. Stock

W. R. Grace & Co. (NYSE:GRA) and Gulf Resources (NASDAQ:GURE) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

84.8% of W. R. Grace & Co. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.0% of Gulf Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of W. R. Grace & Co. shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 30.8% of Gulf Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for W. R. Grace & Co. and Gulf Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
W. R. Grace & Co.	0	6	2	0	2.25
Gulf Resources	0	0	0	0	N/A

W. R. Grace & Co. presently has a consensus target price of $66.00, indicating a potential downside of 3.45%. Given W. R. Grace & Co.'s higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe W. R. Grace & Co. is more favorable than Gulf Resources.

Volatility & Risk

W. R. Grace & Co. has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gulf Resources has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares W. R. Grace & Co. and Gulf Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
W. R. Grace & Co.	$1.96 billion	2.31	$126.30 million	$4.38	15.61
Gulf Resources	$10.60 million	6.08	$-25,800,000.00	N/A	N/A

W. R. Grace & Co. has higher revenue and earnings than Gulf Resources.

Profitability

This table compares W. R. Grace & Co. and Gulf Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
W. R. Grace & Co.	0.76%	55.80%	5.10%
Gulf Resources	-96.50%	-6.12%	-5.81%

Summary

W. R. Grace & Co. beats Gulf Resources on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.