Gulf Resources (GURE) Competitors

TOMI Environmental Solutions has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gulf Resources. TOMI Environmental Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gulf Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

TOMI Environmental Solutions has a beta of 1.77, indicating that its share price is 77% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gulf Resources has a beta of -0.35, indicating that its share price is 135% less volatile than the S&P 500.

4.8% of TOMI Environmental Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Gulf Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 23.5% of TOMI Environmental Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Gulf Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TOMI Environmental Solutions has a net margin of -66.53% compared to Gulf Resources' net margin of -286.77%. Gulf Resources' return on equity of -20.62% beat TOMI Environmental Solutions' return on equity.

In the previous week, TOMI Environmental Solutions had 3 more articles in the media than Gulf Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for TOMI Environmental Solutions and 0 mentions for Gulf Resources. TOMI Environmental Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Gulf Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that TOMI Environmental Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Trinseo has a net margin of -13.15% compared to Gulf Resources' net margin of -286.77%. Trinseo's return on equity of 0.00% beat Gulf Resources' return on equity.

In the previous week, Trinseo had 1 more articles in the media than Gulf Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Trinseo and 0 mentions for Gulf Resources. Gulf Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trinseo'saverage media sentiment score.

Gulf Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trinseo. Gulf Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trinseo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

3.3% of Gulf Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of Trinseo shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.2% of Gulf Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Trinseo shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gulf Resources has a beta of -0.35, meaning that its stock price is 135% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trinseo has a beta of 1.46, meaning that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Trinseo has a consensus target price of $1.00, suggesting a potential upside of 334.78%. Given Trinseo's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Trinseo is more favorable than Gulf Resources.

Gulf Resources has a net margin of -286.77% compared to Senestech's net margin of -287.39%. Gulf Resources' return on equity of -20.62% beat Senestech's return on equity.

In the previous week, Senestech had 1 more articles in the media than Gulf Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Senestech and 0 mentions for Gulf Resources. Senestech's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Gulf Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Senestech is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Senestech has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gulf Resources. Senestech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gulf Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

5.2% of Senestech shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Gulf Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.3% of Senestech shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Gulf Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Senestech has a beta of 0.18, indicating that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gulf Resources has a beta of -0.35, indicating that its stock price is 135% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Evogene has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gulf Resources. Evogene is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gulf Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Evogene had 1 more articles in the media than Gulf Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Evogene and 0 mentions for Gulf Resources. Evogene's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Gulf Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Evogene is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Evogene currently has a consensus target price of $3.50, suggesting a potential upside of 354.07%. Given Evogene's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Evogene is more favorable than Gulf Resources.

10.4% of Evogene shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Gulf Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of Evogene shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Gulf Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Evogene has a net margin of -214.57% compared to Gulf Resources' net margin of -286.77%. Gulf Resources' return on equity of -20.62% beat Evogene's return on equity.

Evogene has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gulf Resources has a beta of -0.35, meaning that its stock price is 135% less volatile than the S&P 500.