Nutrien (NTR) Competitors

Nutrien has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Intrepid Potash's net margin of 4.68%. Nutrien's return on equity of 8.84% beat Intrepid Potash's return on equity.

Intrepid Potash has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nutrien has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

56.1% of Intrepid Potash shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.1% of Nutrien shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Intrepid Potash shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Nutrien shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than Intrepid Potash. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrepid Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Intrepid Potash had 1 more articles in the media than Nutrien. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Intrepid Potash and 2 mentions for Nutrien. Nutrien's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Intrepid Potash's score of -0.25 indicating that Nutrien is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Intrepid Potash presently has a consensus target price of $26.00, indicating a potential downside of 24.57%. Nutrien has a consensus target price of $81.71, indicating a potential upside of 29.91%. Given Nutrien's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Nutrien is more favorable than Intrepid Potash.

Nutrien has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Mosaic's net margin of 0.36%. Nutrien's return on equity of 8.84% beat Mosaic's return on equity.

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than Mosaic. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mosaic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Mosaic currently has a consensus price target of $27.24, suggesting a potential upside of 18.97%. Nutrien has a consensus price target of $81.71, suggesting a potential upside of 29.91%. Given Nutrien's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Nutrien is more favorable than Mosaic.

77.5% of Mosaic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.1% of Nutrien shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Mosaic shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Nutrien shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mosaic pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Nutrien pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Mosaic pays out 676.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Nutrien pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mosaic has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Nutrien has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Mosaic had 6 more articles in the media than Nutrien. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Mosaic and 2 mentions for Nutrien. Nutrien's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Mosaic's score of -0.14 indicating that Nutrien is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Mosaic has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nutrien has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Nutrien has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Element Solutions has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Nutrien and Nutrien both had 2 articles in the media. Element Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Nutrien's score of 0.54 indicating that Element Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

63.1% of Nutrien shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.3% of Element Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Nutrien shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.2% of Element Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Nutrien pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Element Solutions pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Nutrien pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Element Solutions pays out 51.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Nutrien has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Nutrien is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Nutrien has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Element Solutions' net margin of 5.32%. Element Solutions' return on equity of 14.19% beat Nutrien's return on equity.

Nutrien currently has a consensus target price of $81.71, indicating a potential upside of 29.91%. Element Solutions has a consensus target price of $39.57, indicating a potential downside of 14.02%. Given Nutrien's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Nutrien is more favorable than Element Solutions.

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than Element Solutions. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Element Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

ICL Group pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Nutrien pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. ICL Group pays out 80.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Nutrien pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nutrien has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Nutrien is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

13.4% of ICL Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.1% of Nutrien shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of ICL Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Nutrien shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, ICL Group and ICL Group both had 2 articles in the media. Nutrien's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat ICL Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Nutrien is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

ICL Group presently has a consensus target price of $6.60, suggesting a potential upside of 28.53%. Nutrien has a consensus target price of $81.71, suggesting a potential upside of 29.91%. Given Nutrien's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Nutrien is more favorable than ICL Group.

ICL Group has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nutrien has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than ICL Group. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ICL Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Nutrien has a net margin of 8.58% compared to ICL Group's net margin of 3.52%. Nutrien's return on equity of 8.84% beat ICL Group's return on equity.