Nutrien (NTR) Competitors

Nutrien presently has a consensus price target of $82.75, suggesting a potential upside of 20.76%. Intrepid Potash has a consensus price target of $26.00, suggesting a potential downside of 33.30%. Given Nutrien's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Nutrien is more favorable than Intrepid Potash.

Nutrien has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Intrepid Potash's net margin of 4.68%. Nutrien's return on equity of 8.84% beat Intrepid Potash's return on equity.

63.1% of Nutrien shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.1% of Intrepid Potash shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Nutrien shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Intrepid Potash shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than Intrepid Potash. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrepid Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Nutrien has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intrepid Potash has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Nutrien had 6 more articles in the media than Intrepid Potash. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Nutrien and 1 mentions for Intrepid Potash. Nutrien's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Intrepid Potash's score of 0.34 indicating that Nutrien is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Nutrien has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Mosaic's net margin of 0.36%. Nutrien's return on equity of 8.84% beat Mosaic's return on equity.

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than Mosaic. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mosaic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Mosaic had 6 more articles in the media than Nutrien. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Mosaic and 7 mentions for Nutrien. Nutrien's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Mosaic's score of -0.58 indicating that Nutrien is being referred to more favorably in the media.

63.1% of Nutrien shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of Mosaic shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Nutrien shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Mosaic shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Nutrien has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mosaic has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Nutrien presently has a consensus target price of $82.75, suggesting a potential upside of 20.76%. Mosaic has a consensus target price of $27.47, suggesting a potential upside of 14.78%. Given Nutrien's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Nutrien is more favorable than Mosaic.

Nutrien pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Mosaic pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Nutrien pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mosaic pays out 676.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Nutrien has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Mosaic has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than Element Solutions. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Element Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Nutrien presently has a consensus target price of $82.75, suggesting a potential upside of 20.76%. Element Solutions has a consensus target price of $39.57, suggesting a potential downside of 6.68%. Given Nutrien's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Nutrien is more favorable than Element Solutions.

Nutrien has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Element Solutions' net margin of 5.32%. Element Solutions' return on equity of 14.19% beat Nutrien's return on equity.

63.1% of Nutrien shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.3% of Element Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Nutrien shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.2% of Element Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Nutrien had 7 more articles in the media than Element Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Nutrien and 0 mentions for Element Solutions. Nutrien's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Element Solutions' score of 0.50 indicating that Nutrien is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Nutrien has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Element Solutions has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Nutrien pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Element Solutions pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Nutrien pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Element Solutions pays out 51.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Nutrien has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Nutrien is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Nutrien presently has a consensus target price of $82.75, indicating a potential upside of 20.76%. ICL Group has a consensus target price of $6.60, indicating a potential downside of 0.68%. Given Nutrien's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Nutrien is more favorable than ICL Group.

Nutrien pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. ICL Group pays an annual dividend of $0.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Nutrien pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ICL Group pays out 70.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Nutrien has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Nutrien is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Nutrien has a net margin of 8.58% compared to ICL Group's net margin of 3.52%. Nutrien's return on equity of 8.84% beat ICL Group's return on equity.

In the previous week, Nutrien had 7 more articles in the media than ICL Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Nutrien and 0 mentions for ICL Group. Nutrien's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat ICL Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Nutrien is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than ICL Group. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ICL Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

63.1% of Nutrien shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of ICL Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Nutrien shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Nutrien has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ICL Group has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.