Nutrien (NTR) Competitors

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than Intrepid Potash. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrepid Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Nutrien has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Intrepid Potash's net margin of 4.68%. Nutrien's return on equity of 8.84% beat Intrepid Potash's return on equity.

Nutrien currently has a consensus price target of $81.84, suggesting a potential upside of 17.63%. Intrepid Potash has a consensus price target of $26.00, suggesting a potential downside of 24.27%. Given Nutrien's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Nutrien is more favorable than Intrepid Potash.

63.1% of Nutrien shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.1% of Intrepid Potash shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Nutrien shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Intrepid Potash shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Nutrien has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intrepid Potash has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Nutrien had 19 more articles in the media than Intrepid Potash. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Nutrien and 1 mentions for Intrepid Potash. Nutrien's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Intrepid Potash's score of -0.50 indicating that Nutrien is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than Mosaic. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mosaic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Mosaic pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Nutrien pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Mosaic pays out 676.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Nutrien pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mosaic has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Nutrien has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Nutrien had 11 more articles in the media than Mosaic. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Nutrien and 9 mentions for Mosaic. Nutrien's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Mosaic's score of 0.22 indicating that Nutrien is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Mosaic has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nutrien has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Nutrien has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Mosaic's net margin of 0.36%. Nutrien's return on equity of 8.84% beat Mosaic's return on equity.

77.5% of Mosaic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.1% of Nutrien shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Mosaic shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Nutrien shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mosaic currently has a consensus target price of $27.11, indicating a potential upside of 20.16%. Nutrien has a consensus target price of $81.84, indicating a potential upside of 17.63%. Given Mosaic's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Mosaic is more favorable than Nutrien.

63.1% of Nutrien shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.3% of Element Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Nutrien shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.2% of Element Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Nutrien pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Element Solutions pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Nutrien pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Element Solutions pays out 43.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Nutrien has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Nutrien is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Nutrien and Nutrien both had 20 articles in the media. Element Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat Nutrien's score of 0.99 indicating that Element Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Nutrien presently has a consensus target price of $81.84, indicating a potential upside of 17.63%. Element Solutions has a consensus target price of $43.50, indicating a potential upside of 21.32%. Given Element Solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Element Solutions is more favorable than Nutrien.

Nutrien has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Element Solutions has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Nutrien has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Element Solutions' net margin of 5.67%. Element Solutions' return on equity of 14.88% beat Nutrien's return on equity.

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than Element Solutions. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Element Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Nutrien has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Axalta Coating Systems' net margin of 6.78%. Axalta Coating Systems' return on equity of 22.35% beat Nutrien's return on equity.

63.1% of Nutrien shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.3% of Axalta Coating Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Nutrien shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Axalta Coating Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than Axalta Coating Systems. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Axalta Coating Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Nutrien has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Axalta Coating Systems has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Axalta Coating Systems had 8 more articles in the media than Nutrien. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Axalta Coating Systems and 20 mentions for Nutrien. Nutrien's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Axalta Coating Systems' score of 0.74 indicating that Nutrien is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Nutrien presently has a consensus target price of $81.84, suggesting a potential upside of 17.63%. Axalta Coating Systems has a consensus target price of $36.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.07%. Given Nutrien's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Nutrien is more favorable than Axalta Coating Systems.