Nutrien (NTR) Competitors

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than Intrepid Potash. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrepid Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Intrepid Potash has a net margin of 8.31% compared to Nutrien's net margin of 7.78%. Nutrien's return on equity of 8.00% beat Intrepid Potash's return on equity.

In the previous week, Nutrien had 11 more articles in the media than Intrepid Potash. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Nutrien and 3 mentions for Intrepid Potash. Nutrien's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Intrepid Potash's score of -0.32 indicating that Nutrien is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Intrepid Potash has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nutrien has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Intrepid Potash presently has a consensus target price of $36.67, suggesting a potential upside of 10.06%. Nutrien has a consensus target price of $79.19, suggesting a potential upside of 11.20%. Given Nutrien's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Nutrien is more favorable than Intrepid Potash.

56.1% of Intrepid Potash shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.1% of Nutrien shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Intrepid Potash shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Nutrien shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mosaic has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nutrien has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Nutrien had 5 more articles in the media than Mosaic. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Nutrien and 9 mentions for Mosaic. Nutrien's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Mosaic's score of 0.33 indicating that Nutrien is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

77.5% of Mosaic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.1% of Nutrien shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Mosaic shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Nutrien shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mosaic pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Nutrien pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Mosaic pays out -24.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nutrien pays out 48.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Mosaic has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Nutrien has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Mosaic is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Nutrien has a net margin of 7.78% compared to Mosaic's net margin of -9.43%. Nutrien's return on equity of 8.00% beat Mosaic's return on equity.

Mosaic currently has a consensus price target of $25.63, suggesting a potential upside of 17.95%. Nutrien has a consensus price target of $79.19, suggesting a potential upside of 11.20%. Given Mosaic's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Mosaic is more favorable than Nutrien.

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than Mosaic. Mosaic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nutrien, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Corteva has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nutrien has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Nutrien has a net margin of 7.78% compared to Corteva's net margin of 5.66%. Corteva's return on equity of 10.18% beat Nutrien's return on equity.

In the previous week, Corteva had 14 more articles in the media than Nutrien. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Corteva and 14 mentions for Nutrien. Nutrien's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Corteva's score of 0.19 indicating that Nutrien is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Corteva pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. Nutrien pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Corteva pays out 47.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nutrien pays out 48.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Corteva has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Nutrien has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Corteva is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Corteva presently has a consensus target price of $56.91, suggesting a potential upside of 514.37%. Nutrien has a consensus target price of $79.19, suggesting a potential upside of 11.20%. Given Corteva's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Corteva is more favorable than Nutrien.

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than Corteva. Corteva is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nutrien, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

81.5% of Corteva shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.1% of Nutrien shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Corteva shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Nutrien shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, ICL Group and ICL Group both had 14 articles in the media. Nutrien's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat ICL Group's score of -0.13 indicating that Nutrien is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Nutrien has a net margin of 7.78% compared to ICL Group's net margin of 3.99%. ICL Group's return on equity of 8.38% beat Nutrien's return on equity.

ICL Group currently has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 30.58%. Nutrien has a consensus target price of $79.19, indicating a potential upside of 11.20%. Given ICL Group's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe ICL Group is more favorable than Nutrien.

ICL Group pays an annual dividend of $0.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Nutrien pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. ICL Group pays out 70.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nutrien pays out 48.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Nutrien has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than ICL Group. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ICL Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

13.4% of ICL Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.1% of Nutrien shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of ICL Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Nutrien shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ICL Group has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nutrien has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.