NYSE:NTR

Nutrien Competitors

$54.92
+0.24 (+0.44 %)
(As of 04/9/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$54.36
Now: $54.92
$54.95
50-Day Range
$53.25
MA: $55.84
$58.81
52-Week Range
$29.70
Now: $54.92
$59.76
Volume1.27 million shs
Average Volume2.03 million shs
Market Capitalization$31.30 billion
P/E Ratio323.06
Dividend Yield3.29%
Beta0.9

Competitors

Nutrien (NYSE:NTR) Vs. SMG, MOS, CF, ICL, AVD, and UAN

Should you be buying NTR stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "agricultural chemicals" are considered alternatives and competitors to Nutrien, including The Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG), The Mosaic (MOS), CF Industries (CF), ICL Group (ICL), American Vanguard (AVD), and CVR Partners (UAN).

The Scotts Miracle-Gro (NYSE:SMG) and Nutrien (NYSE:NTR) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and earnings.

Dividends

The Scotts Miracle-Gro pays an annual dividend of $2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Nutrien pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. The Scotts Miracle-Gro pays out 34.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nutrien pays out 82.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Scotts Miracle-Gro has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years and Nutrien has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

63.1% of The Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.9% of Nutrien shares are held by institutional investors. 27.2% of The Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Nutrien shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares The Scotts Miracle-Gro and Nutrien's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Scotts Miracle-Gro$4.13 billion3.36$387.40 million$7.2434.39
Nutrien$20.02 billion1.56$992 million$2.1725.31

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than The Scotts Miracle-Gro. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Scotts Miracle-Gro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for The Scotts Miracle-Gro and Nutrien, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Scotts Miracle-Gro00313.25
Nutrien15712.57

The Scotts Miracle-Gro currently has a consensus price target of $250.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.41%. Nutrien has a consensus price target of $55.8889, indicating a potential upside of 1.76%. Given Nutrien's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Nutrien is more favorable than The Scotts Miracle-Gro.

Profitability

This table compares The Scotts Miracle-Gro and Nutrien's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Scotts Miracle-Gro9.38%52.60%11.09%
Nutrien0.47%4.19%1.98%

Volatility and Risk

The Scotts Miracle-Gro has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nutrien has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

The Scotts Miracle-Gro beats Nutrien on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Mosaic (NYSE:MOS) and Nutrien (NYSE:NTR) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

The Mosaic has a beta of 1.81, suggesting that its stock price is 81% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nutrien has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares The Mosaic and Nutrien's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Mosaic$8.91 billion1.34$-1,067,400,000.00$0.19165.63
Nutrien$20.02 billion1.56$992 million$2.1725.31

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than The Mosaic. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Mosaic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

69.8% of The Mosaic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.9% of Nutrien shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of The Mosaic shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Nutrien shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares The Mosaic and Nutrien's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Mosaic-13.05%N/AN/A
Nutrien0.47%4.19%1.98%

Dividends

The Mosaic pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Nutrien pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. The Mosaic pays out 105.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Nutrien pays out 82.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Mosaic has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Nutrien has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Nutrien is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for The Mosaic and Nutrien, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Mosaic19902.42
Nutrien15712.57

The Mosaic currently has a consensus target price of $26.6389, suggesting a potential downside of 15.35%. Nutrien has a consensus target price of $55.8889, suggesting a potential upside of 1.76%. Given Nutrien's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Nutrien is more favorable than The Mosaic.

Summary

Nutrien beats The Mosaic on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nutrien (NYSE:NTR) and CF Industries (NYSE:CF) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Nutrien and CF Industries' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Nutrien0.47%4.19%1.98%
CF Industries7.00%5.14%2.34%

Volatility & Risk

Nutrien has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CF Industries has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its share price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Nutrien pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. CF Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Nutrien pays out 82.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CF Industries pays out 62.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nutrien has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and CF Industries has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Nutrien and CF Industries, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Nutrien15712.57
CF Industries17602.36

Nutrien currently has a consensus price target of $55.8889, suggesting a potential upside of 1.76%. CF Industries has a consensus price target of $43.75, suggesting a potential downside of 4.91%. Given Nutrien's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Nutrien is more favorable than CF Industries.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Nutrien and CF Industries' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nutrien$20.02 billion1.56$992 million$2.1725.31
CF Industries$4.59 billion2.15$493 million$1.9323.84

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than CF Industries. CF Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nutrien, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

61.9% of Nutrien shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.0% of CF Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Nutrien shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of CF Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Nutrien beats CF Industries on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

ICL Group (NYSE:ICL) and Nutrien (NYSE:NTR) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

Dividends

ICL Group pays an annual dividend of $0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Nutrien pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. ICL Group pays out 21.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nutrien pays out 82.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. ICL Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Nutrien has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

7.4% of ICL Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.9% of Nutrien shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Nutrien shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for ICL Group and Nutrien, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
ICL Group02002.00
Nutrien15712.57

ICL Group currently has a consensus price target of $5.75, indicating a potential downside of 10.02%. Nutrien has a consensus price target of $55.8889, indicating a potential upside of 1.76%. Given Nutrien's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Nutrien is more favorable than ICL Group.

Profitability

This table compares ICL Group and Nutrien's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
ICL Group-0.12%5.99%2.56%
Nutrien0.47%4.19%1.98%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ICL Group and Nutrien's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ICL Group$5.27 billion1.55$475 million$0.3717.27
Nutrien$20.02 billion1.56$992 million$2.1725.31

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than ICL Group. ICL Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nutrien, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

ICL Group has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nutrien has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Nutrien beats ICL Group on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

American Vanguard (NYSE:AVD) and Nutrien (NYSE:NTR) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

76.5% of American Vanguard shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.9% of Nutrien shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.3% of American Vanguard shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Nutrien shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

American Vanguard has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nutrien has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

American Vanguard pays an annual dividend of $0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Nutrien pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. American Vanguard pays out 17.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nutrien pays out 82.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. American Vanguard has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Nutrien has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares American Vanguard and Nutrien's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
American Vanguard2.40%3.16%1.61%
Nutrien0.47%4.19%1.98%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for American Vanguard and Nutrien, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
American Vanguard0000N/A
Nutrien15712.57

Nutrien has a consensus target price of $55.8889, suggesting a potential upside of 1.76%. Given Nutrien's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Nutrien is more favorable than American Vanguard.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares American Vanguard and Nutrien's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
American Vanguard$468.19 million1.32$13.60 million$0.4643.48
Nutrien$20.02 billion1.56$992 million$2.1725.31

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than American Vanguard. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than American Vanguard, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Nutrien beats American Vanguard on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

CVR Partners (NYSE:UAN) and Nutrien (NYSE:NTR) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

61.9% of Nutrien shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Nutrien shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CVR Partners and Nutrien's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CVR Partners$404.18 million1.27$-34,970,000.00N/AN/A
Nutrien$20.02 billion1.56$992 million$2.1725.31

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than CVR Partners.

Profitability

This table compares CVR Partners and Nutrien's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CVR Partners-30.71%-17.27%-5.98%
Nutrien0.47%4.19%1.98%

Risk and Volatility

CVR Partners has a beta of 1.84, meaning that its share price is 84% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nutrien has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for CVR Partners and Nutrien, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CVR Partners0000N/A
Nutrien15712.57

Nutrien has a consensus price target of $55.8889, suggesting a potential upside of 1.76%. Given Nutrien's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Nutrien is more favorable than CVR Partners.

Summary

Nutrien beats CVR Partners on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


Nutrien Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
The Scotts Miracle-Gro logo
SMG
The Scotts Miracle-Gro
1.7$248.99+0.5%$13.87 billion$4.13 billion36.56Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
The Mosaic logo
MOS
The Mosaic
1.7$31.47+1.4%$11.93 billion$8.91 billion-10.97
CF Industries logo
CF
CF Industries
2.0$46.01+1.1%$9.87 billion$4.59 billion34.86News Coverage
ICL Group logo
ICL
ICL Group
1.6$6.39+0.0%$8.18 billion$5.27 billion17.27
American Vanguard logo
AVD
American Vanguard
0.9$20.00+0.5%$618.04 million$468.19 million54.06
CVR Partners logo
UAN
CVR Partners
0.4$48.05+1.1%$513.75 million$404.18 million-5.11Gap Up
Marrone Bio Innovations logo
MBII
Marrone Bio Innovations
1.3$1.87+1.6%$324.41 million$29.37 million-9.84Gap Up
Calyxt logo
CLXT
Calyxt
1.3$5.97+1.5%$221.82 million$7.30 million-4.49
Evogene logo
EVGN
Evogene
1.3$4.65+4.5%$119.74 million$750,000.00-5.74Gap Down
China Green Agriculture logo
CGA
China Green Agriculture
0.8$7.76+18.4%$49.28 million$249.24 million-0.29High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Up
SenesTech logo
SNES
SenesTech
1.5$1.69+3.6%$8.62 million$140,000.00-0.22Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/10/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.