Nutrien (NTR) Competitors

In the previous week, Nutrien had 5 more articles in the media than Intrepid Potash. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Nutrien and 2 mentions for Intrepid Potash. Intrepid Potash's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Nutrien's score of 0.46 indicating that Intrepid Potash is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Nutrien has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Intrepid Potash's net margin of 4.68%. Nutrien's return on equity of 8.84% beat Intrepid Potash's return on equity.

Nutrien has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intrepid Potash has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Nutrien presently has a consensus target price of $80.94, indicating a potential upside of 23.67%. Intrepid Potash has a consensus target price of $26.00, indicating a potential downside of 25.52%. Given Nutrien's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Nutrien is more favorable than Intrepid Potash.

63.1% of Nutrien shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.1% of Intrepid Potash shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Nutrien shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Intrepid Potash shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than Intrepid Potash. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrepid Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

77.5% of Mosaic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.1% of Nutrien shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Mosaic shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Nutrien shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Mosaic pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Nutrien pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Mosaic pays out 676.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Nutrien pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mosaic has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Nutrien has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

Mosaic currently has a consensus price target of $27.11, indicating a potential upside of 26.09%. Nutrien has a consensus price target of $80.94, indicating a potential upside of 23.67%. Given Mosaic's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Mosaic is more favorable than Nutrien.

Mosaic has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nutrien has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Nutrien had 7 more articles in the media than Mosaic. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Nutrien and 0 mentions for Mosaic. Nutrien's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Mosaic's score of -0.20 indicating that Nutrien is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than Mosaic. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mosaic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Nutrien has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Mosaic's net margin of 0.36%. Nutrien's return on equity of 8.84% beat Mosaic's return on equity.

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than Element Solutions. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Element Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Nutrien pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Element Solutions pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Nutrien pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Element Solutions pays out 51.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Nutrien has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Nutrien is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Element Solutions had 15 more articles in the media than Nutrien. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Element Solutions and 7 mentions for Nutrien. Element Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Nutrien's score of 0.46 indicating that Element Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Nutrien has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Element Solutions has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Nutrien currently has a consensus price target of $80.94, indicating a potential upside of 23.67%. Element Solutions has a consensus price target of $44.29, indicating a potential upside of 11.05%. Given Nutrien's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Nutrien is more favorable than Element Solutions.

63.1% of Nutrien shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.3% of Element Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Nutrien shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.2% of Element Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Nutrien has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Element Solutions' net margin of 5.32%. Element Solutions' return on equity of 14.19% beat Nutrien's return on equity.

In the previous week, Nutrien had 4 more articles in the media than Axalta Coating Systems. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Nutrien and 3 mentions for Axalta Coating Systems. Axalta Coating Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Nutrien's score of 0.46 indicating that Axalta Coating Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

63.1% of Nutrien shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.3% of Axalta Coating Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Nutrien shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Axalta Coating Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Nutrien presently has a consensus price target of $80.94, suggesting a potential upside of 23.67%. Axalta Coating Systems has a consensus price target of $35.38, suggesting a potential upside of 8.88%. Given Nutrien's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Nutrien is more favorable than Axalta Coating Systems.

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than Axalta Coating Systems. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Axalta Coating Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Nutrien has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Axalta Coating Systems has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Nutrien has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Axalta Coating Systems' net margin of 7.22%. Axalta Coating Systems' return on equity of 22.37% beat Nutrien's return on equity.