Free Trial

Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG) Competitors

Scotts Miracle-Gro logo
$61.71 -0.17 (-0.28%)
Closing price 06/12/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$61.84 +0.14 (+0.22%)
As of 06/12/2026 08:00 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SMG vs. MOS, IPI, AVD, CF, and AGRO

Should you buy Scotts Miracle-Gro stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Scotts Miracle-Gro with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Scotts Miracle-Gro include Mosaic (MOS), Intrepid Potash (IPI), American Vanguard (AVD), CF Industries (CF), and Adecoagro (AGRO).

How does Scotts Miracle-Gro compare to Mosaic?

Mosaic (NYSE:MOS) and Scotts Miracle-Gro (NYSE:SMG) are both mid-cap fertilizers & agricultural chemicals companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

Mosaic pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Scotts Miracle-Gro pays an annual dividend of $2.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Mosaic pays out 676.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Scotts Miracle-Gro pays out 147.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Mosaic has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Scotts Miracle-Gro is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Mosaic currently has a consensus price target of $27.47, suggesting a potential upside of 21.07%. Scotts Miracle-Gro has a consensus price target of $72.67, suggesting a potential upside of 17.76%. Given Mosaic's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Mosaic is more favorable than Scotts Miracle-Gro.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mosaic
3 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.15
Scotts Miracle-Gro
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Mosaic has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Scotts Miracle-Gro has a beta of 1.84, suggesting that its share price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

Scotts Miracle-Gro has a net margin of 3.27% compared to Mosaic's net margin of 0.36%. Mosaic's return on equity of 4.66% beat Scotts Miracle-Gro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mosaic0.36% 4.66% 2.37%
Scotts Miracle-Gro 3.27%-79.61%8.53%

In the previous week, Scotts Miracle-Gro had 5 more articles in the media than Mosaic. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Scotts Miracle-Gro and 0 mentions for Mosaic. Scotts Miracle-Gro's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Mosaic's score of -1.00 indicating that Scotts Miracle-Gro is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mosaic Negative
Scotts Miracle-Gro Positive

Mosaic has higher revenue and earnings than Scotts Miracle-Gro. Scotts Miracle-Gro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mosaic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mosaic$12.05B0.60$540.70M$0.13174.54
Scotts Miracle-Gro$3.41B1.05$145.20M$1.7934.47

77.5% of Mosaic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.1% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Mosaic shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 24.4% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Scotts Miracle-Gro beats Mosaic on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Scotts Miracle-Gro compare to Intrepid Potash?

Intrepid Potash (NYSE:IPI) and Scotts Miracle-Gro (NYSE:SMG) are both fertilizers & agricultural chemicals companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, Scotts Miracle-Gro had 4 more articles in the media than Intrepid Potash. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Scotts Miracle-Gro and 1 mentions for Intrepid Potash. Scotts Miracle-Gro's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Intrepid Potash's score of 0.00 indicating that Scotts Miracle-Gro is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Intrepid Potash
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Scotts Miracle-Gro
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Intrepid Potash has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Scotts Miracle-Gro's net margin of 3.27%. Intrepid Potash's return on equity of 4.53% beat Scotts Miracle-Gro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intrepid Potash4.68% 4.53% 3.57%
Scotts Miracle-Gro 3.27%-79.61%8.53%

56.1% of Intrepid Potash shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.1% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Intrepid Potash shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 24.4% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Scotts Miracle-Gro has higher revenue and earnings than Intrepid Potash. Intrepid Potash is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scotts Miracle-Gro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intrepid Potash$298.33M1.63$11.19M$1.0634.06
Scotts Miracle-Gro$3.41B1.05$145.20M$1.7934.47

Intrepid Potash has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Scotts Miracle-Gro has a beta of 1.84, meaning that its stock price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

Intrepid Potash presently has a consensus price target of $26.00, suggesting a potential downside of 27.99%. Scotts Miracle-Gro has a consensus price target of $72.67, suggesting a potential upside of 17.76%. Given Scotts Miracle-Gro's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Scotts Miracle-Gro is more favorable than Intrepid Potash.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intrepid Potash
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Scotts Miracle-Gro
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Scotts Miracle-Gro beats Intrepid Potash on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Scotts Miracle-Gro compare to American Vanguard?

American Vanguard (NYSE:AVD) and Scotts Miracle-Gro (NYSE:SMG) are both fertilizers & agricultural chemicals companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Scotts Miracle-Gro has a consensus target price of $72.67, indicating a potential upside of 17.76%. Given Scotts Miracle-Gro's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Scotts Miracle-Gro is more favorable than American Vanguard.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
American Vanguard
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Scotts Miracle-Gro
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

79.0% of American Vanguard shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.1% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of American Vanguard shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.4% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Scotts Miracle-Gro had 3 more articles in the media than American Vanguard. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Scotts Miracle-Gro and 2 mentions for American Vanguard. Scotts Miracle-Gro's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat American Vanguard's score of 0.00 indicating that Scotts Miracle-Gro is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
American Vanguard
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Scotts Miracle-Gro
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

American Vanguard has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Scotts Miracle-Gro has a beta of 1.84, suggesting that its stock price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

Scotts Miracle-Gro has higher revenue and earnings than American Vanguard. American Vanguard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scotts Miracle-Gro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
American Vanguard$515.11M0.16-$49.88M-$1.59N/A
Scotts Miracle-Gro$3.41B1.05$145.20M$1.7934.47

Scotts Miracle-Gro has a net margin of 3.27% compared to American Vanguard's net margin of -8.71%. American Vanguard's return on equity of -4.13% beat Scotts Miracle-Gro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
American Vanguard-8.71% -4.13% -1.34%
Scotts Miracle-Gro 3.27%-79.61%8.53%

Summary

Scotts Miracle-Gro beats American Vanguard on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Scotts Miracle-Gro compare to CF Industries?

CF Industries (NYSE:CF) and Scotts Miracle-Gro (NYSE:SMG) are both fertilizers & agricultural chemicals companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, CF Industries had 13 more articles in the media than Scotts Miracle-Gro. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for CF Industries and 5 mentions for Scotts Miracle-Gro. CF Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Scotts Miracle-Gro's score of 0.58 indicating that CF Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CF Industries
13 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Scotts Miracle-Gro
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

CF Industries pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Scotts Miracle-Gro pays an annual dividend of $2.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. CF Industries pays out 18.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Scotts Miracle-Gro pays out 147.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CF Industries has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

CF Industries has a net margin of 23.73% compared to Scotts Miracle-Gro's net margin of 3.27%. CF Industries' return on equity of 20.93% beat Scotts Miracle-Gro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CF Industries23.73% 20.93% 11.66%
Scotts Miracle-Gro 3.27%-79.61%8.53%

CF Industries currently has a consensus price target of $119.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.81%. Scotts Miracle-Gro has a consensus price target of $72.67, suggesting a potential upside of 17.76%. Given Scotts Miracle-Gro's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Scotts Miracle-Gro is more favorable than CF Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CF Industries
3 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.35
Scotts Miracle-Gro
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

CF Industries has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Scotts Miracle-Gro has a beta of 1.84, indicating that its stock price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

93.1% of CF Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.1% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of CF Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.4% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CF Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Scotts Miracle-Gro. CF Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scotts Miracle-Gro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CF Industries$7.08B2.37$1.46B$11.139.83
Scotts Miracle-Gro$3.41B1.05$145.20M$1.7934.47

Summary

CF Industries beats Scotts Miracle-Gro on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Scotts Miracle-Gro compare to Adecoagro?

Scotts Miracle-Gro (NYSE:SMG) and Adecoagro (NYSE:AGRO) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Scotts Miracle-Gro pays an annual dividend of $2.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Adecoagro pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Scotts Miracle-Gro pays out 147.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Adecoagro pays out 1,200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Adecoagro has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Scotts Miracle-Gro is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Scotts Miracle-Gro had 3 more articles in the media than Adecoagro. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Scotts Miracle-Gro and 2 mentions for Adecoagro. Scotts Miracle-Gro's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Adecoagro's score of 0.33 indicating that Scotts Miracle-Gro is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Scotts Miracle-Gro
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Adecoagro
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

74.1% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.3% of Adecoagro shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.4% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Scotts Miracle-Gro presently has a consensus price target of $72.67, indicating a potential upside of 17.76%. Adecoagro has a consensus price target of $11.53, indicating a potential downside of 0.99%. Given Scotts Miracle-Gro's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Scotts Miracle-Gro is more favorable than Adecoagro.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Scotts Miracle-Gro
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Adecoagro
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Scotts Miracle-Gro has a net margin of 3.27% compared to Adecoagro's net margin of 0.95%. Adecoagro's return on equity of -2.38% beat Scotts Miracle-Gro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Scotts Miracle-Gro3.27% -79.61% 8.53%
Adecoagro 0.95%-2.38%-0.90%

Scotts Miracle-Gro has a beta of 1.84, meaning that its share price is 84% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Adecoagro has a beta of -0.08, meaning that its share price is 108% less volatile than the broader market.

Scotts Miracle-Gro has higher revenue and earnings than Adecoagro. Scotts Miracle-Gro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Adecoagro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Scotts Miracle-Gro$3.41B1.05$145.20M$1.7934.47
Adecoagro$1.43B1.16-$8.35M$0.02582.45

Summary

Scotts Miracle-Gro beats Adecoagro on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Scotts Miracle-Gro News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SMG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SMG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SMG vs. The Competition

MetricScotts Miracle-GroAGRI OPERATIONS IndustryStaples SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.59B$3.22B$16.62B$23.34B
Dividend Yield4.28%2.77%3.40%4.05%
P/E Ratio34.4733.5619.5528.55
Price / Sales1.053.5447.73100.15
Price / Cash12.098.9713.3818.65
Price / Book-9.973.805.614.69
Net Income$145.20M-$7.12M$683.11M$1.08B
7 Day Performance7.18%1.24%3.60%2.11%
1 Month Performance4.26%-6.19%2.76%1.95%
1 Year Performance0.95%-20.19%-9.13%24.11%

Scotts Miracle-Gro Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SMG
Scotts Miracle-Gro
3.8329 of 5 stars
$61.71
-0.3%
$72.67
+17.8%
+0.9%$3.59B$3.41B34.475,900
MOS
Mosaic
4.2208 of 5 stars
$21.38
-3.8%
$27.47
+28.5%
-36.5%$7.06B$12.05B164.5013,249
IPI
Intrepid Potash
1.0039 of 5 stars
$34.67
-0.8%
$26.00
-25.0%
-0.3%$469.62M$298.33M32.71440
AVD
American Vanguard
0.8786 of 5 stars
$2.66
-0.2%
$12.00
+352.0%
-29.7%$76.09M$515.11MN/A800
CF
CF Industries
3.5825 of 5 stars
$109.54
-3.5%
$119.00
+8.6%
+9.4%$17.44B$7.08B9.842,900

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:SMG) was last updated on 6/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners