Which has stronger valuation and earnings, SMG or CTVA?

Corteva has higher revenue and earnings than Scotts Miracle-Gro. Corteva is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scotts Miracle-Gro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Scotts Miracle-Gro $3.29B 1.15 $103.90M $1.68 38.66 Corteva $17.40B 0.47 $1.09B $1.51 8.08

Does the media refer more to SMG or CTVA?

In the previous week, Corteva had 2 more articles in the media than Scotts Miracle-Gro. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Corteva and 10 mentions for Scotts Miracle-Gro. Corteva's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Scotts Miracle-Gro's score of 0.43 indicating that Corteva is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Scotts Miracle-Gro 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Corteva 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer SMG or ICL?

In the previous week, ICL Group had 3 more articles in the media than Scotts Miracle-Gro. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for ICL Group and 10 mentions for Scotts Miracle-Gro. Scotts Miracle-Gro's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat ICL Group's score of -0.23 indicating that Scotts Miracle-Gro is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Scotts Miracle-Gro 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral ICL Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, SMG or MOS?

Mosaic has higher revenue and earnings than Scotts Miracle-Gro. Mosaic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scotts Miracle-Gro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Scotts Miracle-Gro $3.29B 1.15 $103.90M $1.68 38.66 Mosaic $12.05B 0.60 $540.70M -$3.54 N/A

Does the media favor SMG or MOS?

In the previous week, Scotts Miracle-Gro had 1 more articles in the media than Mosaic. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Scotts Miracle-Gro and 9 mentions for Mosaic. Scotts Miracle-Gro's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Mosaic's score of 0.05 indicating that Scotts Miracle-Gro is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Scotts Miracle-Gro 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Mosaic 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, UAN or SMG?

Scotts Miracle-Gro has higher revenue and earnings than CVR Partners. CVR Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scotts Miracle-Gro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio CVR Partners $606.04M 1.97 $98.66M $10.06 11.25 Scotts Miracle-Gro $3.29B 1.15 $103.90M $1.68 38.66

Does the media favor UAN or SMG?

In the previous week, Scotts Miracle-Gro had 5 more articles in the media than CVR Partners. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Scotts Miracle-Gro and 5 mentions for CVR Partners. Scotts Miracle-Gro's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat CVR Partners' score of -0.13 indicating that Scotts Miracle-Gro is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment CVR Partners 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Scotts Miracle-Gro 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, FMC or SMG?

Scotts Miracle-Gro has higher revenue and earnings than FMC. FMC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scotts Miracle-Gro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FMC $2.81B 0.31 -$2.24B -$33.02 N/A Scotts Miracle-Gro $3.29B 1.15 $103.90M $1.68 38.66

Is FMC or SMG more profitable?

Scotts Miracle-Gro has a net margin of 3.16% compared to FMC's net margin of -151.18%. FMC's return on equity of -30.77% beat Scotts Miracle-Gro's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FMC -151.18% -30.77% -4.78% Scotts Miracle-Gro 3.16% -77.42% 8.57%

Does the media favor FMC or SMG?

In the previous week, FMC had 4 more articles in the media than Scotts Miracle-Gro. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for FMC and 10 mentions for Scotts Miracle-Gro. Scotts Miracle-Gro's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat FMC's score of 0.20 indicating that Scotts Miracle-Gro is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment FMC 3 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Scotts Miracle-Gro 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG) Competitors

$64.96 -0.18 (-0.27%)

Closing price 11/11/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$65.04 +0.09 (+0.13%)

As of 04:01 AM Eastern

Compare

SMG vs. CTVA, ICL, MOS, UAN, and FMC

Should you buy Scotts Miracle-Gro stock or one of its competitors? Scotts Miracle-Gro's main competitors and comparable companies include Corteva (CTVA), ICL Group (ICL), Mosaic (MOS), CVR Partners (UAN), and FMC (FMC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "fertilizers & agricultural chemicals" industry.

How does Scotts Miracle-Gro compare to Corteva?

Scotts Miracle-Gro (NYSE:SMG) and Corteva (NYSE:CTVA) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and risk.

In the previous week, Corteva had 2 more articles in the media than Scotts Miracle-Gro. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Corteva and 10 mentions for Scotts Miracle-Gro. Corteva's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Scotts Miracle-Gro's score of 0.43 indicating that Corteva is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Scotts Miracle-Gro	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Corteva	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Corteva has higher revenue and earnings than Scotts Miracle-Gro. Corteva is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scotts Miracle-Gro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Scotts Miracle-Gro	$3.29B	1.15	$103.90M	$1.68	38.66
Corteva	$17.40B	0.47	$1.09B	$1.51	8.08

Scotts Miracle-Gro presently has a consensus price target of $74.80, indicating a potential upside of 15.16%. Corteva has a consensus price target of $60.59, indicating a potential upside of 396.85%. Given Corteva's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Corteva is more favorable than Scotts Miracle-Gro.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Scotts Miracle-Gro	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
Corteva	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.65

Scotts Miracle-Gro pays an annual dividend of $2.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Corteva pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Scotts Miracle-Gro pays out 157.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Corteva pays out 47.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Corteva has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Corteva is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Scotts Miracle-Gro has a beta of 1.87, indicating that its share price is 87% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corteva has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Corteva has a net margin of 5.66% compared to Scotts Miracle-Gro's net margin of 3.16%. Corteva's return on equity of 10.18% beat Scotts Miracle-Gro's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Scotts Miracle-Gro	3.16%	-77.42%	8.57%
Corteva	5.66%	10.18%	6.00%

74.1% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of Corteva shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.4% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Corteva shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Corteva beats Scotts Miracle-Gro on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Scotts Miracle-Gro compare to ICL Group?

Scotts Miracle-Gro (NYSE:SMG) and ICL Group (NYSE:ICL) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability and dividends.

Scotts Miracle-Gro presently has a consensus price target of $74.80, indicating a potential upside of 15.16%. ICL Group has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 31.43%. Given ICL Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ICL Group is more favorable than Scotts Miracle-Gro.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Scotts Miracle-Gro	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
ICL Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Scotts Miracle-Gro has a beta of 1.87, indicating that its share price is 87% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ICL Group has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

ICL Group has a net margin of 3.99% compared to Scotts Miracle-Gro's net margin of 3.16%. ICL Group's return on equity of 8.44% beat Scotts Miracle-Gro's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Scotts Miracle-Gro	3.16%	-77.42%	8.57%
ICL Group	3.99%	8.44%	4.16%

ICL Group has higher revenue and earnings than Scotts Miracle-Gro. ICL Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scotts Miracle-Gro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Scotts Miracle-Gro	$3.29B	1.15	$103.90M	$1.68	38.66
ICL Group	$7.15B	0.82	$226M	$0.24	19.02

In the previous week, ICL Group had 3 more articles in the media than Scotts Miracle-Gro. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for ICL Group and 10 mentions for Scotts Miracle-Gro. Scotts Miracle-Gro's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat ICL Group's score of -0.23 indicating that Scotts Miracle-Gro is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Scotts Miracle-Gro	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
ICL Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Scotts Miracle-Gro pays an annual dividend of $2.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. ICL Group pays an annual dividend of $0.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Scotts Miracle-Gro pays out 157.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. ICL Group pays out 70.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

74.1% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of ICL Group shares are held by institutional investors. 24.4% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of ICL Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Scotts Miracle-Gro beats ICL Group on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Scotts Miracle-Gro compare to Mosaic?

Scotts Miracle-Gro (NYSE:SMG) and Mosaic (NYSE:MOS) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Scotts Miracle-Gro presently has a consensus price target of $74.80, indicating a potential upside of 15.16%. Mosaic has a consensus price target of $25.63, indicating a potential upside of 12.47%. Given Scotts Miracle-Gro's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Scotts Miracle-Gro is more favorable than Mosaic.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Scotts Miracle-Gro	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
Mosaic	4 Sell rating(s)	13 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.09

Scotts Miracle-Gro has a beta of 1.87, meaning that its stock price is 87% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mosaic has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Scotts Miracle-Gro had 1 more articles in the media than Mosaic. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Scotts Miracle-Gro and 9 mentions for Mosaic. Scotts Miracle-Gro's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Mosaic's score of 0.05 indicating that Scotts Miracle-Gro is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Scotts Miracle-Gro	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Mosaic	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Mosaic has higher revenue and earnings than Scotts Miracle-Gro. Mosaic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scotts Miracle-Gro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Scotts Miracle-Gro	$3.29B	1.15	$103.90M	$1.68	38.66
Mosaic	$12.05B	0.60	$540.70M	-$3.54	N/A

74.1% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of Mosaic shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.4% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Mosaic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Scotts Miracle-Gro pays an annual dividend of $2.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Mosaic pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Scotts Miracle-Gro pays out 157.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Mosaic pays out -24.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mosaic has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

Scotts Miracle-Gro has a net margin of 3.16% compared to Mosaic's net margin of -9.43%. Mosaic's return on equity of 0.58% beat Scotts Miracle-Gro's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Scotts Miracle-Gro	3.16%	-77.42%	8.57%
Mosaic	-9.43%	0.58%	0.28%

Summary

Scotts Miracle-Gro beats Mosaic on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Scotts Miracle-Gro compare to CVR Partners?

CVR Partners (NYSE:UAN) and Scotts Miracle-Gro (NYSE:SMG) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Scotts Miracle-Gro has higher revenue and earnings than CVR Partners. CVR Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scotts Miracle-Gro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CVR Partners	$606.04M	1.97	$98.66M	$10.06	11.25
Scotts Miracle-Gro	$3.29B	1.15	$103.90M	$1.68	38.66

43.8% of CVR Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.1% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of CVR Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.4% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CVR Partners has a net margin of 16.14% compared to Scotts Miracle-Gro's net margin of 3.16%. CVR Partners' return on equity of 35.58% beat Scotts Miracle-Gro's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CVR Partners	16.14%	35.58%	10.38%
Scotts Miracle-Gro	3.16%	-77.42%	8.57%

In the previous week, Scotts Miracle-Gro had 5 more articles in the media than CVR Partners. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Scotts Miracle-Gro and 5 mentions for CVR Partners. Scotts Miracle-Gro's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat CVR Partners' score of -0.13 indicating that Scotts Miracle-Gro is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
CVR Partners	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Scotts Miracle-Gro	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

CVR Partners pays an annual dividend of $24.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 21.5%. Scotts Miracle-Gro pays an annual dividend of $2.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. CVR Partners pays out 241.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Scotts Miracle-Gro pays out 157.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CVR Partners has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CVR Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

CVR Partners has a beta of 0.21, indicating that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Scotts Miracle-Gro has a beta of 1.87, indicating that its stock price is 87% more volatile than the broader market.

CVR Partners currently has a consensus price target of $124.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.56%. Scotts Miracle-Gro has a consensus price target of $74.80, indicating a potential upside of 15.16%. Given Scotts Miracle-Gro's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Scotts Miracle-Gro is more favorable than CVR Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CVR Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Scotts Miracle-Gro	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

Summary

Scotts Miracle-Gro beats CVR Partners on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Scotts Miracle-Gro compare to FMC?

FMC (NYSE:FMC) and Scotts Miracle-Gro (NYSE:SMG) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

FMC presently has a consensus target price of $10.71, suggesting a potential upside of 89.47%. Scotts Miracle-Gro has a consensus target price of $74.80, suggesting a potential upside of 15.16%. Given FMC's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe FMC is more favorable than Scotts Miracle-Gro.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FMC	4 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.94
Scotts Miracle-Gro	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

Scotts Miracle-Gro has a net margin of 3.16% compared to FMC's net margin of -151.18%. FMC's return on equity of -30.77% beat Scotts Miracle-Gro's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FMC	-151.18%	-30.77%	-4.78%
Scotts Miracle-Gro	3.16%	-77.42%	8.57%

FMC pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Scotts Miracle-Gro pays an annual dividend of $2.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. FMC pays out -1.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Scotts Miracle-Gro pays out 157.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. FMC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, FMC had 4 more articles in the media than Scotts Miracle-Gro. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for FMC and 10 mentions for Scotts Miracle-Gro. Scotts Miracle-Gro's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat FMC's score of 0.20 indicating that Scotts Miracle-Gro is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
FMC	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Scotts Miracle-Gro	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Scotts Miracle-Gro has higher revenue and earnings than FMC. FMC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scotts Miracle-Gro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FMC	$2.81B	0.31	-$2.24B	-$33.02	N/A
Scotts Miracle-Gro	$3.29B	1.15	$103.90M	$1.68	38.66

91.9% of FMC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.1% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of FMC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.4% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

FMC has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Scotts Miracle-Gro has a beta of 1.87, indicating that its stock price is 87% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Scotts Miracle-Gro beats FMC on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Scotts Miracle-Gro News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SMG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SMG vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Scotts Miracle-Gro	Chemicals Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$3.79B	$11.48B	$4.70B	$23.43B
Dividend Yield	3.98%	2.98%	4.30%	3.74%
P/E Ratio	38.66	32.49	27.63	27.04
Price / Sales	1.15	2.34	5.70	3.19
Price / Cash	11.39	14.75	20.90	15.86
Price / Book	-10.15	3.55	4.14	3.73
Net Income	$103.90M	$237.31M	$159.85M	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	-2.07%	0.63%	0.83%	2.53%
1 Month Performance	29.94%	-0.49%	-5.61%	1.23%
1 Year Performance	11.06%	11.96%	8.05%	6.57%

Scotts Miracle-Gro Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SMG Scotts Miracle-Gro	3.6445 of 5 stars	$64.96 -0.3%	$74.80 +15.2%	+12.0%	$3.79B	$3.29B	38.66	5,900
CTVA Corteva	4.7736 of 5 stars	$11.92 +2.4%	$60.59 +408.3%	-81.4%	$7.56B	$17.40B	2.99	21,500	Earnings Report
ICL ICL Group	4.0489 of 5 stars	$4.59 +0.1%	$6.00 +30.9%	-19.6%	$6.01B	$7.15B	11.10	13,007	Trending News Earnings Report Dividend Announcement
MOS Mosaic	3.4518 of 5 stars	$19.00 +3.3%	$25.79 +35.8%	-11.4%	$5.83B	$12.05B	12.73	13,249	Analyst Forecast
UAN CVR Partners	2.2159 of 5 stars	$124.14 -2.1%	$124.00 -0.1%	+16.4%	$1.32B	$606.04M	8.19	320

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:SMG) was last updated on 11/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG) Competitors

SMG vs. CTVA, ICL, MOS, UAN, and FMC

How does Scotts Miracle-Gro compare to Corteva?

Summary

How does Scotts Miracle-Gro compare to ICL Group?

Summary

How does Scotts Miracle-Gro compare to Mosaic?

Summary

How does Scotts Miracle-Gro compare to CVR Partners?

Summary

How does Scotts Miracle-Gro compare to FMC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SMG vs. The Competition

Scotts Miracle-Gro Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG) Competitors

SMG vs. CTVA, ICL, MOS, UAN, and FMC

How does Scotts Miracle-Gro compare to Corteva?

Does the media refer more to SMG or CTVA?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, SMG or CTVA?

Do analysts rate SMG or CTVA?

Is SMG or CTVA a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, SMG or CTVA?

Is SMG or CTVA more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in SMG or CTVA?

Summary

How does Scotts Miracle-Gro compare to ICL Group?

Do analysts recommend SMG or ICL?

Which has more volatility & risk, SMG or ICL?

Is SMG or ICL more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, SMG or ICL?

Does the media prefer SMG or ICL?

Is SMG or ICL a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in SMG or ICL?

Summary

How does Scotts Miracle-Gro compare to Mosaic?

Do analysts recommend SMG or MOS?

Which has more volatility & risk, SMG or MOS?

Does the media favor SMG or MOS?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, SMG or MOS?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in SMG or MOS?

Is SMG or MOS a better dividend stock?

Is SMG or MOS more profitable?

Summary

How does Scotts Miracle-Gro compare to CVR Partners?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, UAN or SMG?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in UAN or SMG?

Is UAN or SMG more profitable?

Does the media favor UAN or SMG?

Is UAN or SMG a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, UAN or SMG?

Do analysts rate UAN or SMG?

Summary

How does Scotts Miracle-Gro compare to FMC?

Do analysts prefer FMC or SMG?

Is FMC or SMG more profitable?

Is FMC or SMG a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor FMC or SMG?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, FMC or SMG?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in FMC or SMG?

Which has more volatility and risk, FMC or SMG?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SMG vs. The Competition

Scotts Miracle-Gro Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools