Minerals Technologies Competitors

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and The Sherwin-Williams (NYSE:SHW) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. The Sherwin-Williams pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Minerals Technologies pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Sherwin-Williams pays out 10.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Minerals Technologies and The Sherwin-Williams' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

The Sherwin-Williams has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. The Sherwin-Williams is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Minerals Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Minerals Technologies and The Sherwin-Williams, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Minerals Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $67.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 19.48%. The Sherwin-Williams has a consensus price target of $309.9412, suggesting a potential upside of 8.34%. Given The Sherwin-Williams' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe The Sherwin-Williams is more favorable than Minerals Technologies.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

94.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.5% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Minerals Technologies and The Sherwin-Williams' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

The Sherwin-Williams beats Minerals Technologies on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and Ecolab (NYSE:ECL) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ecolab has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Ecolab pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Minerals Technologies pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ecolab pays out 33.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Ecolab has increased its dividend for 36 consecutive years. Ecolab is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Minerals Technologies and Ecolab's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Ecolab has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ecolab, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Minerals Technologies and Ecolab, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Minerals Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $67.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 19.48%. Ecolab has a consensus price target of $228.70, suggesting a potential upside of 2.07%. Given Ecolab's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ecolab is more favorable than Minerals Technologies.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

94.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.6% of Ecolab shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Ecolab shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Minerals Technologies and Ecolab's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Ecolab beats Minerals Technologies on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and International Flavors & Fragrances (NYSE:IFF) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, International Flavors & Fragrances has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. International Flavors & Fragrances pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Minerals Technologies pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Flavors & Fragrances pays out 49.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and International Flavors & Fragrances has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years. International Flavors & Fragrances is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Minerals Technologies and International Flavors & Fragrances' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

International Flavors & Fragrances has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Flavors & Fragrances, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Minerals Technologies and International Flavors & Fragrances, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Minerals Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $67.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 19.48%. International Flavors & Fragrances has a consensus price target of $147.5385, suggesting a potential upside of 4.48%. Given International Flavors & Fragrances' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe International Flavors & Fragrances is more favorable than Minerals Technologies.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

94.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.4% of International Flavors & Fragrances shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of International Flavors & Fragrances shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Minerals Technologies and International Flavors & Fragrances' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

International Flavors & Fragrances beats Minerals Technologies on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and Albemarle (NYSE:ALB) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Albemarle has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its share price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Minerals Technologies and Albemarle's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Minerals Technologies and Albemarle's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Albemarle has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Albemarle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Minerals Technologies and Albemarle, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Minerals Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $67.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 19.48%. Albemarle has a consensus price target of $142.1429, suggesting a potential downside of 13.23%. Given Albemarle's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Albemarle is more favorable than Minerals Technologies.

Dividends

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Albemarle pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Minerals Technologies pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Albemarle pays out 25.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Albemarle has increased its dividend for 27 consecutive years. Albemarle is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

94.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.4% of Albemarle shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Albemarle shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Albemarle beats Minerals Technologies on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and Celanese (NYSE:CE) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and valuation.

Volatility & Risk

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.47, meaning that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Celanese has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Minerals Technologies and Celanese's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Minerals Technologies and Celanese's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Celanese has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Celanese is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Minerals Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Minerals Technologies and Celanese, as provided by MarketBeat.

Minerals Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $67.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 19.48%. Celanese has a consensus price target of $156.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 6.29%. Given Celanese's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Celanese is more favorable than Minerals Technologies.

Dividends

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Celanese pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Minerals Technologies pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Celanese pays out 28.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Celanese has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

94.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.5% of Celanese shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Celanese shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Celanese beats Minerals Technologies on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and RPM International (NYSE:RPM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and valuation.

Volatility & Risk

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.47, meaning that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RPM International has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Minerals Technologies and RPM International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Minerals Technologies and RPM International's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

RPM International has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RPM International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Minerals Technologies and RPM International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Minerals Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $67.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 19.48%. RPM International has a consensus price target of $96.8750, suggesting a potential downside of 0.11%. Given RPM International's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe RPM International is more favorable than Minerals Technologies.

Dividends

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. RPM International pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Minerals Technologies pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RPM International pays out 49.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and RPM International has increased its dividend for 19 consecutive years. RPM International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

94.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.7% of RPM International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of RPM International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

RPM International beats Minerals Technologies on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.