Minerals Technologies (MTX) Competitors

$78.78 +0.67 (+0.85%)

As of 10:03 AM Eastern

MTX vs. IOSP, AVNT, CBT, DOV, and EMN

Should you buy Minerals Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Minerals Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Minerals Technologies include Innospec (IOSP), Avient (AVNT), Cabot (CBT), Dover (DOV), and Eastman Chemical (EMN).

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Innospec?

Innospec (NASDAQ:IOSP) and Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Innospec pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Innospec pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Minerals Technologies pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Innospec has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years and Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Innospec is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Minerals Technologies has a consensus target price of $90.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.25%. Given Minerals Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Innospec.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Innospec	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Minerals Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Innospec has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Minerals Technologies has a net margin of 7.60% compared to Innospec's net margin of 6.38%. Minerals Technologies' return on equity of 10.40% beat Innospec's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Innospec	6.38%	9.32%	6.79%
Minerals Technologies	7.60%	10.40%	5.19%

Innospec has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Innospec, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Innospec	$1.78B	1.14	$116.60M	$4.59	17.95
Minerals Technologies	$2.13B	1.15	-$18.40M	$5.17	15.24

96.6% of Innospec shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Innospec shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Innospec. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 1 mentions for Innospec. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Innospec's score of 0.00 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Innospec	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Minerals Technologies	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Minerals Technologies beats Innospec on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Avient?

Avient (NYSE:AVNT) and Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

95.5% of Avient shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Avient shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Avient has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Avient presently has a consensus price target of $46.40, indicating a potential upside of 28.19%. Minerals Technologies has a consensus price target of $90.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.25%. Given Avient's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Avient is more favorable than Minerals Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Avient	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Minerals Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Avient pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Avient pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Minerals Technologies pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Avient has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Minerals Technologies has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 5 more articles in the media than Avient. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 0 mentions for Avient. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Avient's score of 1.00 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Avient	Positive
Minerals Technologies	Positive

Avient has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Avient	$3.28B	1.01	$81.90M	$1.72	21.04
Minerals Technologies	$2.13B	1.15	-$18.40M	$5.17	15.24

Minerals Technologies has a net margin of 7.60% compared to Avient's net margin of 4.81%. Avient's return on equity of 11.11% beat Minerals Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Avient	4.81%	11.11%	4.40%
Minerals Technologies	7.60%	10.40%	5.19%

Summary

Minerals Technologies beats Avient on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Cabot?

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and Cabot (NYSE:CBT) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and institutional ownership.

Minerals Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $90.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.25%. Cabot has a consensus price target of $80.25, indicating a potential downside of 6.25%. Given Minerals Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Cabot.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Minerals Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Cabot	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Cabot shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Cabot shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Cabot. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 2 mentions for Cabot. Cabot's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 1.10 indicating that Cabot is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Minerals Technologies	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cabot	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cabot has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cabot, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Minerals Technologies	$2.13B	1.15	-$18.40M	$5.17	15.24
Cabot	$3.58B	1.24	$331M	$5.29	16.18

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Cabot pays an annual dividend of $1.89 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Minerals Technologies pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cabot pays out 35.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Cabot has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Cabot is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cabot has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Cabot has a net margin of 7.97% compared to Minerals Technologies' net margin of 7.60%. Cabot's return on equity of 21.33% beat Minerals Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Minerals Technologies	7.60%	10.40%	5.19%
Cabot	7.97%	21.33%	9.48%

Summary

Cabot beats Minerals Technologies on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Dover?

Dover (NYSE:DOV) and Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) are related companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

Dover has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than Dover. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 3 mentions for Dover. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Dover's score of 1.07 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Dover	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Minerals Technologies	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Dover currently has a consensus price target of $237.36, suggesting a potential upside of 10.58%. Minerals Technologies has a consensus price target of $90.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.25%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Dover.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Dover	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
Minerals Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Dover pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Dover pays out 25.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Minerals Technologies pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Dover has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years and Minerals Technologies has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Dover is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dover, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dover	$8.09B	3.57	$1.09B	$8.02	26.76
Minerals Technologies	$2.13B	1.15	-$18.40M	$5.17	15.24

84.5% of Dover shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Dover shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dover has a net margin of 13.30% compared to Minerals Technologies' net margin of 7.60%. Dover's return on equity of 18.01% beat Minerals Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dover	13.30%	18.01%	10.10%
Minerals Technologies	7.60%	10.40%	5.19%

Summary

Dover beats Minerals Technologies on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Eastman Chemical?

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and Eastman Chemical (NYSE:EMN) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of Eastman Chemical shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Eastman Chemical shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Eastman Chemical has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eastman Chemical, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Minerals Technologies	$2.13B	1.15	-$18.40M	$5.17	15.24
Eastman Chemical	$8.75B	0.98	$474M	$3.45	21.74

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Minerals Technologies has a net margin of 7.60% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of 4.62%. Minerals Technologies' return on equity of 10.40% beat Eastman Chemical's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Minerals Technologies	7.60%	10.40%	5.19%
Eastman Chemical	4.62%	8.88%	3.52%

Minerals Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $90.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.25%. Eastman Chemical has a consensus price target of $80.25, indicating a potential upside of 7.01%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Eastman Chemical.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Minerals Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Eastman Chemical	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than Eastman Chemical. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 3 mentions for Eastman Chemical. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Eastman Chemical's score of 0.08 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Minerals Technologies	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Eastman Chemical	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Eastman Chemical pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Minerals Technologies pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eastman Chemical pays out 97.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Minerals Technologies has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Eastman Chemical has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Eastman Chemical is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Minerals Technologies beats Eastman Chemical on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Minerals Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MTX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MTX vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Minerals Technologies	CHEM Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.44B	$15.37B	$4.86B	$23.26B
Dividend Yield	0.63%	1.97%	5.00%	4.09%
P/E Ratio	15.23	36.14	23.23	31.04
Price / Sales	1.15	2.50	7,488.84	81.45
Price / Cash	9.04	14.46	27.21	25.06
Price / Book	1.39	4.32	6.80	4.80
Net Income	-$18.40M	$376.44M	$157.24M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	3.59%	3.71%	1.39%	2.04%
1 Month Performance	9.04%	0.09%	0.21%	1.60%
1 Year Performance	31.26%	20.67%	76.71%	27.18%

Minerals Technologies Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MTX Minerals Technologies	4.1382 of 5 stars	$78.78 +0.9%	$90.00 +14.2%	+33.9%	$2.44B	$2.13B	15.23	3,782	Positive News
IOSP Innospec	2.7925 of 5 stars	$79.05 +1.2%	N/A	-4.2%	$1.92B	$1.78B	17.22	2,450
AVNT Avient	4.5921 of 5 stars	$33.53 -0.7%	$46.40 +38.4%	-1.7%	$3.10B	$3.26B	19.49	9,000	Positive News
CBT Cabot	3.465 of 5 stars	$81.75 +0.9%	$80.25 -1.8%	+14.5%	$4.18B	$3.71B	15.45	4,100	Positive News
DOV Dover	4.2673 of 5 stars	$210.72 0.0%	$237.36 +12.6%	+21.3%	$28.38B	$8.09B	26.27	24,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MTX) was last updated on 5/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Minerals Technologies (MTX) Competitors

MTX vs. IOSP, AVNT, CBT, DOV, and EMN

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Innospec?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Avient?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Cabot?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Dover?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Eastman Chemical?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MTX vs. The Competition

Minerals Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Minerals Technologies (MTX) Competitors

MTX vs. IOSP, AVNT, CBT, DOV, and EMN

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Innospec?

Is IOSP or MTX a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate IOSP or MTX?

Which has more volatility & risk, IOSP or MTX?

Is IOSP or MTX more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, IOSP or MTX?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in IOSP or MTX?

Does the media prefer IOSP or MTX?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Avient?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in AVNT or MTX?

Which has more risk and volatility, AVNT or MTX?

Do analysts rate AVNT or MTX?

Is AVNT or MTX a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer AVNT or MTX?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, AVNT or MTX?

Is AVNT or MTX more profitable?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Cabot?

Do analysts recommend MTX or CBT?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in MTX or CBT?

Does the media favor MTX or CBT?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MTX or CBT?

Is MTX or CBT a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, MTX or CBT?

Is MTX or CBT more profitable?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Dover?

Which has more risk & volatility, DOV or MTX?

Does the media favor DOV or MTX?

Do analysts rate DOV or MTX?

Is DOV or MTX a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, DOV or MTX?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in DOV or MTX?

Is DOV or MTX more profitable?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Eastman Chemical?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in MTX or EMN?

Which has better earnings & valuation, MTX or EMN?

Which has more volatility & risk, MTX or EMN?

Is MTX or EMN more profitable?

Do analysts recommend MTX or EMN?

Does the media prefer MTX or EMN?

Is MTX or EMN a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MTX vs. The Competition

Minerals Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools