Do analysts rate MTX or IOSP?

Minerals Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $90.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.55%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Innospec. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Minerals Technologies 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Innospec 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media prefer MTX or IOSP?

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies and Minerals Technologies both had 4 articles in the media. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Innospec's score of 0.85 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Minerals Technologies 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Innospec 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor MTX or AVNT?

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies and Minerals Technologies both had 4 articles in the media. Avient's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 0.93 indicating that Avient is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Minerals Technologies 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Avient 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to MTX or BC?

In the previous week, Brunswick had 6 more articles in the media than Minerals Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Brunswick and 4 mentions for Minerals Technologies. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 0.93 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Minerals Technologies 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Brunswick 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor CBT or MTX?

In the previous week, Cabot had 7 more articles in the media than Minerals Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Cabot and 4 mentions for Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Cabot's score of 0.84 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cabot 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Minerals Technologies 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor EMN or MTX?

In the previous week, Eastman Chemical had 18 more articles in the media than Minerals Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Eastman Chemical and 4 mentions for Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Eastman Chemical's score of 0.82 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Eastman Chemical 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Minerals Technologies 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Minerals Technologies (MTX) Competitors

$72.26 -0.72 (-0.99%)

As of 03:58 PM Eastern

Compare

MTX vs. IOSP, AVNT, BC, CBT, and EMN

Should you buy Minerals Technologies stock or one of its competitors? Minerals Technologies's main competitors and comparable companies include Innospec (IOSP), Avient (AVNT), Brunswick (BC), Cabot (CBT), and Eastman Chemical (EMN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Innospec?

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and Innospec (NASDAQ:IOSP) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Minerals Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $90.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.55%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Innospec.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Minerals Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Innospec	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Innospec pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Minerals Technologies pays out -22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Innospec pays out 37.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Innospec has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years. Innospec is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Innospec has a net margin of 6.60% compared to Minerals Technologies' net margin of -3.13%. Minerals Technologies' return on equity of 10.63% beat Innospec's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Minerals Technologies	-3.13%	10.63%	5.20%
Innospec	6.60%	9.22%	6.74%

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies and Minerals Technologies both had 4 articles in the media. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Innospec's score of 0.85 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Minerals Technologies	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Innospec	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Innospec has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Innospec, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Minerals Technologies	$2.07B	1.09	-$18.40M	-$2.17	N/A
Innospec	$1.78B	1.30	$116.60M	$4.90	19.15

97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of Innospec shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Innospec shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Innospec has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Minerals Technologies beats Innospec on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Avient?

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and Avient (NYSE:AVNT) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies and Minerals Technologies both had 4 articles in the media. Avient's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 0.93 indicating that Avient is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Minerals Technologies	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Avient	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avient has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Minerals Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $90.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.55%. Avient has a consensus target price of $46.71, indicating a potential upside of 3.14%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Avient.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Minerals Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Avient	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Avient has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Minerals Technologies	$2.07B	1.09	-$18.40M	-$2.17	N/A
Avient	$3.26B	1.27	$81.90M	$1.85	24.48

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Avient pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Minerals Technologies pays out -22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avient pays out 59.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Avient has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Avient shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Avient shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Avient has a net margin of 5.10% compared to Minerals Technologies' net margin of -3.13%. Avient's return on equity of 11.64% beat Minerals Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Minerals Technologies	-3.13%	10.63%	5.20%
Avient	5.10%	11.64%	4.67%

Summary

Avient beats Minerals Technologies on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Brunswick?

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and Brunswick (NYSE:BC) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Brunswick has a net margin of -1.53% compared to Minerals Technologies' net margin of -3.13%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat Minerals Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Minerals Technologies	-3.13%	10.63%	5.20%
Brunswick	-1.53%	15.28%	4.60%

In the previous week, Brunswick had 6 more articles in the media than Minerals Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Brunswick and 4 mentions for Minerals Technologies. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 0.93 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Minerals Technologies	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Brunswick	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Minerals Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Minerals Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Minerals Technologies	$2.07B	1.09	-$18.40M	-$2.17	N/A
Brunswick	$5.36B	0.99	-$137.30M	-$1.31	N/A

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Minerals Technologies pays out -22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brunswick pays out -134.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Brunswick has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Minerals Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $90.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.55%. Brunswick has a consensus price target of $88.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.89%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Brunswick.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Minerals Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Brunswick	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.47

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunswick has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Brunswick beats Minerals Technologies on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Cabot?

Cabot (NYSE:CBT) and Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Cabot has a net margin of 5.23% compared to Minerals Technologies' net margin of -3.13%. Cabot's return on equity of 20.29% beat Minerals Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cabot	5.23%	20.29%	9.01%
Minerals Technologies	-3.13%	10.63%	5.20%

In the previous week, Cabot had 7 more articles in the media than Minerals Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Cabot and 4 mentions for Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Cabot's score of 0.84 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cabot	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Minerals Technologies	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cabot has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cabot, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cabot	$3.71B	1.20	$331M	$3.55	24.35
Minerals Technologies	$2.07B	1.09	-$18.40M	-$2.17	N/A

93.2% of Cabot shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Cabot shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cabot has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Cabot presently has a consensus price target of $89.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.96%. Minerals Technologies has a consensus price target of $90.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.55%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Cabot.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cabot	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.14
Minerals Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Cabot pays an annual dividend of $1.89 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Cabot pays out 53.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Minerals Technologies pays out -22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cabot has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years and Minerals Technologies has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Cabot is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Cabot beats Minerals Technologies on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Eastman Chemical?

Eastman Chemical (NYSE:EMN) and Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Eastman Chemical currently has a consensus target price of $79.17, indicating a potential upside of 7.30%. Minerals Technologies has a consensus target price of $90.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.55%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Eastman Chemical.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Eastman Chemical	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Minerals Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

83.7% of Eastman Chemical shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Eastman Chemical shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Eastman Chemical pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Eastman Chemical pays out 87.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Minerals Technologies pays out -22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eastman Chemical has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years and Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Eastman Chemical is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Eastman Chemical has a net margin of 4.99% compared to Minerals Technologies' net margin of -3.13%. Minerals Technologies' return on equity of 10.63% beat Eastman Chemical's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Eastman Chemical	4.99%	9.46%	3.78%
Minerals Technologies	-3.13%	10.63%	5.20%

In the previous week, Eastman Chemical had 18 more articles in the media than Minerals Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Eastman Chemical and 4 mentions for Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Eastman Chemical's score of 0.82 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Eastman Chemical	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Minerals Technologies	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Eastman Chemical has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eastman Chemical, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Eastman Chemical	$8.75B	0.96	$474M	$3.84	19.21
Minerals Technologies	$2.07B	1.09	-$18.40M	-$2.17	N/A

Summary

Eastman Chemical beats Minerals Technologies on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Minerals Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MTX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MTX vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Minerals Technologies	Chemicals Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.27B	$11.52B	$4.86B	$24.35B
Dividend Yield	0.66%	2.85%	4.71%	3.69%
P/E Ratio	-33.30	42.10	25.28	30.51
Price / Sales	1.09	52.06	4,718.52	21.03
Price / Cash	8.59	15.51	24.65	20.48
Price / Book	1.29	3.58	8.86	4.92
Net Income	-$18.40M	$222.46M	$154.79M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-3.03%	-0.11%	0.47%	0.25%
1 Month Performance	-3.49%	2.76%	9.14%	2.59%
1 Year Performance	18.93%	19.24%	44.00%	18.80%

Minerals Technologies Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MTX Minerals Technologies	3.2523 of 5 stars	$72.26 -1.0%	$90.00 +24.6%	+20.0%	$2.27B	$2.07B	N/A	3,782	Ex-Dividend
IOSP Innospec	3.9422 of 5 stars	$92.89 +0.5%	N/A	+13.2%	$2.28B	$1.78B	18.96	2,450
AVNT Avient	3.1818 of 5 stars	$45.35 -0.7%	$46.71 +3.0%	+30.3%	$4.19B	$3.26B	24.51	9,000	Positive News
BC Brunswick	3.6334 of 5 stars	$80.10 -1.8%	$87.57 +9.3%	+30.3%	$5.28B	$5.36B	N/A	14,000	Positive News Analyst Forecast
CBT Cabot	3.1609 of 5 stars	$86.38 -1.4%	$89.00 +3.0%	+12.3%	$4.52B	$3.71B	24.33	4,100

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MTX) was last updated on 8/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Minerals Technologies (MTX) Competitors

MTX vs. IOSP, AVNT, BC, CBT, and EMN

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Innospec?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Avient?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Brunswick?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Cabot?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Eastman Chemical?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MTX vs. The Competition

Minerals Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Minerals Technologies (MTX) Competitors

MTX vs. IOSP, AVNT, BC, CBT, and EMN

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Innospec?

Do analysts rate MTX or IOSP?

Is MTX or IOSP a better dividend stock?

Is MTX or IOSP more profitable?

Does the media prefer MTX or IOSP?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MTX or IOSP?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in MTX or IOSP?

Which has more volatility and risk, MTX or IOSP?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Avient?

Does the media favor MTX or AVNT?

Which has more volatility & risk, MTX or AVNT?

Do analysts rate MTX or AVNT?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, MTX or AVNT?

Is MTX or AVNT a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in MTX or AVNT?

Is MTX or AVNT more profitable?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Brunswick?

Is MTX or BC more profitable?

Does the media refer more to MTX or BC?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, MTX or BC?

Is MTX or BC a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate MTX or BC?

Which has more risk & volatility, MTX or BC?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in MTX or BC?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Cabot?

Is CBT or MTX more profitable?

Does the media favor CBT or MTX?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CBT or MTX?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CBT or MTX?

Which has more volatility & risk, CBT or MTX?

Do analysts prefer CBT or MTX?

Is CBT or MTX a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Eastman Chemical?

Do analysts recommend EMN or MTX?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of EMN or MTX?

Which has more risk & volatility, EMN or MTX?

Is EMN or MTX a better dividend stock?

Is EMN or MTX more profitable?

Does the media favor EMN or MTX?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, EMN or MTX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MTX vs. The Competition

Minerals Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools