Do analysts prefer MTX or IOSP?

Minerals Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $90.00, indicating a potential upside of 21.83%. Given Minerals Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Innospec. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Minerals Technologies 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 Innospec 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media refer more to MTX or IOSP?

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 8 more articles in the media than Innospec. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 5 mentions for Innospec. Innospec's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 0.68 indicating that Innospec is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Minerals Technologies 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Innospec 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor MTX or AVNT?

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 9 more articles in the media than Avient. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 4 mentions for Avient. Avient's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 0.68 indicating that Avient is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Minerals Technologies 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Avient 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer BC or MTX?

In the previous week, Brunswick had 2 more articles in the media than Minerals Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Brunswick and 13 mentions for Minerals Technologies. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 0.68 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Brunswick 7 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Minerals Technologies 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to MTX or CBT?

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 11 more articles in the media than Cabot. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 2 mentions for Cabot. Cabot's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 0.68 indicating that Cabot is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Minerals Technologies 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cabot 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to MTX or DOV?

In the previous week, Dover had 8 more articles in the media than Minerals Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Dover and 13 mentions for Minerals Technologies. Dover's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 0.68 indicating that Dover is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Minerals Technologies 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Dover 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Minerals Technologies (MTX) Competitors

$73.88 -0.73 (-0.97%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$72.42 -1.45 (-1.96%)

As of 07:34 PM Eastern

Compare

MTX vs. IOSP, AVNT, BC, CBT, and DOV

Should you buy Minerals Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Minerals Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Minerals Technologies include Innospec (IOSP), Avient (AVNT), Brunswick (BC), Cabot (CBT), and Dover (DOV).

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Innospec?

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and Innospec (NASDAQ:IOSP) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 8 more articles in the media than Innospec. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 5 mentions for Innospec. Innospec's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 0.68 indicating that Innospec is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Minerals Technologies	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Innospec	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Innospec has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Minerals Technologies has a net margin of 7.60% compared to Innospec's net margin of 6.38%. Minerals Technologies' return on equity of 10.40% beat Innospec's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Minerals Technologies	7.60%	10.40%	5.19%
Innospec	6.38%	9.32%	6.79%

Minerals Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $90.00, indicating a potential upside of 21.83%. Given Minerals Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Innospec.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Minerals Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Innospec	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Innospec has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Innospec, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Minerals Technologies	$2.07B	1.11	-$18.40M	$5.17	14.29
Innospec	$1.78B	1.19	$116.60M	$4.59	18.66

97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of Innospec shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Innospec shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Innospec pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Minerals Technologies pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Innospec pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Innospec has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years. Innospec is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Minerals Technologies beats Innospec on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Avient?

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and Avient (NYSE:AVNT) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Avient has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Minerals Technologies	$2.07B	1.11	-$18.40M	$5.17	14.29
Avient	$3.26B	1.03	$81.90M	$1.72	21.20

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avient has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Minerals Technologies has a net margin of 7.60% compared to Avient's net margin of 4.81%. Avient's return on equity of 11.11% beat Minerals Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Minerals Technologies	7.60%	10.40%	5.19%
Avient	4.81%	11.11%	4.40%

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Avient pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Minerals Technologies pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avient pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Avient has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Avient shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Avient shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 9 more articles in the media than Avient. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 4 mentions for Avient. Avient's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 0.68 indicating that Avient is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Minerals Technologies	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Avient	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Minerals Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $90.00, indicating a potential upside of 21.83%. Avient has a consensus price target of $45.71, indicating a potential upside of 25.36%. Given Avient's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Avient is more favorable than Minerals Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Minerals Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Avient	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43

Summary

Avient beats Minerals Technologies on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Brunswick?

Brunswick (NYSE:BC) and Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

99.3% of Brunswick shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Brunswick shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Brunswick had 2 more articles in the media than Minerals Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Brunswick and 13 mentions for Minerals Technologies. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 0.68 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Brunswick	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Minerals Technologies	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Brunswick presently has a consensus price target of $87.07, suggesting a potential upside of 8.09%. Minerals Technologies has a consensus price target of $90.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.83%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Brunswick.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Brunswick	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.47
Minerals Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Minerals Technologies has a net margin of 7.60% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -2.47%. Brunswick's return on equity of 13.30% beat Minerals Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Brunswick	-2.47%	13.30%	4.09%
Minerals Technologies	7.60%	10.40%	5.19%

Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Brunswick pays out -83.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Minerals Technologies pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Brunswick has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Minerals Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Minerals Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Brunswick	$5.36B	0.98	-$137.30M	-$2.10	N/A
Minerals Technologies	$2.07B	1.11	-$18.40M	$5.17	14.29

Summary

Brunswick beats Minerals Technologies on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Cabot?

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and Cabot (NYSE:CBT) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Cabot has a net margin of 7.97% compared to Minerals Technologies' net margin of 7.60%. Cabot's return on equity of 21.33% beat Minerals Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Minerals Technologies	7.60%	10.40%	5.19%
Cabot	7.97%	21.33%	9.48%

Minerals Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $90.00, indicating a potential upside of 21.83%. Cabot has a consensus price target of $85.80, indicating a potential downside of 3.87%. Given Minerals Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Cabot.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Minerals Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Cabot	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.14

97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Cabot shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Cabot shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cabot has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 11 more articles in the media than Cabot. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 2 mentions for Cabot. Cabot's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 0.68 indicating that Cabot is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Minerals Technologies	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cabot	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cabot has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cabot, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Minerals Technologies	$2.07B	1.11	-$18.40M	$5.17	14.29
Cabot	$3.71B	1.24	$331M	$5.29	16.87

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Cabot pays an annual dividend of $1.89 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Minerals Technologies pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cabot pays out 35.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Cabot has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Cabot is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Cabot beats Minerals Technologies on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Dover?

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and Dover (NYSE:DOV) are related companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, Dover had 8 more articles in the media than Minerals Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Dover and 13 mentions for Minerals Technologies. Dover's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 0.68 indicating that Dover is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Minerals Technologies	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Dover	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Dover shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Dover shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Dover pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Minerals Technologies pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dover pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Dover has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Dover is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dover, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Minerals Technologies	$2.07B	1.11	-$18.40M	$5.17	14.29
Dover	$8.09B	3.42	$1.09B	$8.30	24.79

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dover has a beta of 1.16, indicating that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

Minerals Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $90.00, indicating a potential upside of 21.83%. Dover has a consensus price target of $238.29, indicating a potential upside of 15.79%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Dover.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Minerals Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Dover	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Dover has a net margin of 13.48% compared to Minerals Technologies' net margin of 7.60%. Dover's return on equity of 18.32% beat Minerals Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Minerals Technologies	7.60%	10.40%	5.19%
Dover	13.48%	18.32%	10.26%

Summary

Dover beats Minerals Technologies on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Minerals Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MTX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MTX vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Minerals Technologies	CHEM Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.29B	$15.43B	$4.55B	$23.64B
Dividend Yield	0.64%	2.05%	5.02%	4.20%
P/E Ratio	14.29	35.34	21.09	31.20
Price / Sales	1.11	2.46	5,200.58	19.78
Price / Cash	8.78	14.28	24.09	18.54
Price / Book	1.31	4.93	8.74	4.78
Net Income	-$18.40M	$375.67M	$156.22M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	1.00%	0.92%	1.54%	0.65%
1 Month Performance	-7.04%	-2.25%	-1.39%	0.26%
1 Year Performance	12.73%	7.07%	35.96%	14.70%

Minerals Technologies Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MTX Minerals Technologies	4.3844 of 5 stars	$73.88 -1.0%	$90.00 +21.8%	+13.7%	$2.29B	$2.07B	14.29	3,782	Upcoming Earnings Dividend Announcement
IOSP Innospec	3.7964 of 5 stars	$83.95 -0.4%	N/A	+0.5%	$2.08B	$1.78B	18.29	2,450	Positive News
AVNT Avient	4.171 of 5 stars	$36.10 -2.3%	$45.71 +26.6%	+10.6%	$3.39B	$3.26B	20.99	9,000
BC Brunswick	3.5871 of 5 stars	$79.09 -1.7%	$87.07 +10.1%	+32.0%	$5.23B	$5.36B	N/A	14,000	Upcoming Earnings Dividend Announcement Gap Up
CBT Cabot	4.0464 of 5 stars	$88.96 -1.6%	$85.80 -3.5%	+18.6%	$4.67B	$3.71B	16.82	4,100	Upcoming Earnings

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MTX) was last updated on 7/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Minerals Technologies (MTX) Competitors

MTX vs. IOSP, AVNT, BC, CBT, and DOV

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Innospec?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Avient?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Brunswick?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Cabot?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Dover?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MTX vs. The Competition

Minerals Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Minerals Technologies (MTX) Competitors

MTX vs. IOSP, AVNT, BC, CBT, and DOV

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Innospec?

Does the media refer more to MTX or IOSP?

Which has more volatility & risk, MTX or IOSP?

Is MTX or IOSP more profitable?

Do analysts prefer MTX or IOSP?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, MTX or IOSP?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in MTX or IOSP?

Is MTX or IOSP a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Avient?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, MTX or AVNT?

Which has more risk & volatility, MTX or AVNT?

Is MTX or AVNT more profitable?

Is MTX or AVNT a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MTX or AVNT?

Does the media favor MTX or AVNT?

Do analysts recommend MTX or AVNT?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Brunswick?

Which has more volatility & risk, BC or MTX?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in BC or MTX?

Does the media prefer BC or MTX?

Do analysts prefer BC or MTX?

Is BC or MTX more profitable?

Is BC or MTX a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, BC or MTX?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Cabot?

Is MTX or CBT more profitable?

Do analysts prefer MTX or CBT?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MTX or CBT?

Which has more volatility & risk, MTX or CBT?

Does the media refer more to MTX or CBT?

Which has better earnings and valuation, MTX or CBT?

Is MTX or CBT a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Dover?

Does the media refer more to MTX or DOV?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MTX or DOV?

Is MTX or DOV a better dividend stock?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MTX or DOV?

Which has more risk and volatility, MTX or DOV?

Do analysts prefer MTX or DOV?

Is MTX or DOV more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MTX vs. The Competition

Minerals Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools