Do analysts prefer IOSP or MTX?

Minerals Technologies has a consensus target price of $90.00, indicating a potential upside of 34.03%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Innospec. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Innospec 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Minerals Technologies 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media favor IOSP or MTX?

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 9 more articles in the media than Innospec. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 7 mentions for Innospec. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Innospec's score of 0.60 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Innospec 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Minerals Technologies 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to UFPI or MTX?

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 10 more articles in the media than UFP Industries. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 6 mentions for UFP Industries. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat UFP Industries' score of 0.64 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment UFP Industries 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Minerals Technologies 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to MTX or AVNT?

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 13 more articles in the media than Avient. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 3 mentions for Avient. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Avient's score of 0.82 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Minerals Technologies 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Avient 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to MTX or BC?

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Brunswick. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 13 mentions for Brunswick. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Brunswick's score of 0.71 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Minerals Technologies 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Brunswick 5 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer CBT or MTX?

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 13 more articles in the media than Cabot. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 3 mentions for Cabot. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Cabot's score of 0.71 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cabot 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Minerals Technologies 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Minerals Technologies (MTX) Competitors

$67.15 +0.80 (+1.21%)

Closing price 09/25/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$67.02 -0.14 (-0.20%)

As of 09/25/2026 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

MTX vs. IOSP, UFPI, AVNT, BC, and CBT

Should you buy Minerals Technologies stock or one of its competitors? Minerals Technologies's main competitors and comparable companies include Innospec (IOSP), UFP Industries (UFPI), Avient (AVNT), Brunswick (BC), and Cabot (CBT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Innospec?

Innospec (NASDAQ:IOSP) and Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability and risk.

Minerals Technologies has a consensus target price of $90.00, indicating a potential upside of 34.03%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Innospec.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Innospec	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Minerals Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Innospec has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Innospec, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Innospec	$1.84B	1.32	$116.60M	$4.90	20.15
Minerals Technologies	$2.07B	1.01	-$18.40M	-$2.17	N/A

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 9 more articles in the media than Innospec. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 7 mentions for Innospec. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Innospec's score of 0.60 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Innospec	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Minerals Technologies	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

96.6% of Innospec shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Innospec shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Innospec pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Innospec pays out 37.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Minerals Technologies pays out -22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Innospec has raised its dividend for 11 consecutive years and Minerals Technologies has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Innospec is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Innospec has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Innospec has a net margin of 6.60% compared to Minerals Technologies' net margin of -3.13%. Minerals Technologies' return on equity of 10.63% beat Innospec's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Innospec	6.60%	9.22%	6.74%
Minerals Technologies	-3.13%	10.63%	5.20%

Summary

Minerals Technologies beats Innospec on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to UFP Industries?

UFP Industries (NASDAQ:UFPI) and Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

UFP Industries has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

UFP Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. UFP Industries pays out 33.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Minerals Technologies pays out -22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. UFP Industries has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Minerals Technologies has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. UFP Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 10 more articles in the media than UFP Industries. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 6 mentions for UFP Industries. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat UFP Industries' score of 0.64 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
UFP Industries	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Minerals Technologies	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

81.8% of UFP Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of UFP Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

UFP Industries presently has a consensus price target of $104.50, indicating a potential upside of 31.46%. Minerals Technologies has a consensus price target of $90.00, indicating a potential upside of 34.03%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than UFP Industries.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
UFP Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Minerals Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

UFP Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UFP Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
UFP Industries	$6.32B	0.69	$294.79M	$4.36	18.23
Minerals Technologies	$2.07B	1.01	-$18.40M	-$2.17	N/A

UFP Industries has a net margin of 3.99% compared to Minerals Technologies' net margin of -3.13%. Minerals Technologies' return on equity of 10.63% beat UFP Industries' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
UFP Industries	3.99%	8.00%	6.11%
Minerals Technologies	-3.13%	10.63%	5.20%

Summary

UFP Industries beats Minerals Technologies on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Avient?

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and Avient (NYSE:AVNT) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and dividends.

97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Avient shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Avient shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Avient has a net margin of 5.10% compared to Minerals Technologies' net margin of -3.13%. Avient's return on equity of 11.64% beat Minerals Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Minerals Technologies	-3.13%	10.63%	5.20%
Avient	5.10%	11.64%	4.67%

Minerals Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $90.00, suggesting a potential upside of 34.03%. Avient has a consensus price target of $46.71, suggesting a potential upside of 12.97%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Avient.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Minerals Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Avient	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avient has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Avient pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Minerals Technologies pays out -22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avient pays out 59.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Avient has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 13 more articles in the media than Avient. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 3 mentions for Avient. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Avient's score of 0.82 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Minerals Technologies	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Avient	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Avient has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Minerals Technologies	$2.07B	1.01	-$18.40M	-$2.17	N/A
Avient	$3.26B	1.16	$81.90M	$1.85	22.35

Summary

Avient beats Minerals Technologies on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Brunswick?

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and Brunswick (NYSE:BC) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, risk and dividends.

97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.3% of Brunswick shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Brunswick shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunswick has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Brunswick has a net margin of -1.53% compared to Minerals Technologies' net margin of -3.13%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat Minerals Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Minerals Technologies	-3.13%	10.63%	5.20%
Brunswick	-1.53%	15.28%	4.60%

Minerals Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Minerals Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Minerals Technologies	$2.07B	1.01	-$18.40M	-$2.17	N/A
Brunswick	$5.36B	0.81	-$137.30M	-$1.31	N/A

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Brunswick. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 13 mentions for Brunswick. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Brunswick's score of 0.71 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Minerals Technologies	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Brunswick	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Minerals Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $90.00, indicating a potential upside of 34.03%. Brunswick has a consensus price target of $88.00, indicating a potential upside of 30.83%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Brunswick.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Minerals Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Brunswick	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Minerals Technologies pays out -22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brunswick pays out -134.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Brunswick has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Brunswick beats Minerals Technologies on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Cabot?

Cabot (NYSE:CBT) and Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

Cabot currently has a consensus target price of $89.00, suggesting a potential upside of 12.88%. Minerals Technologies has a consensus target price of $90.00, suggesting a potential upside of 34.03%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Cabot.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cabot	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.14
Minerals Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

93.2% of Cabot shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Cabot shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cabot has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cabot, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cabot	$3.71B	1.10	$331M	$3.55	22.21
Minerals Technologies	$2.07B	1.01	-$18.40M	-$2.17	N/A

Cabot has a net margin of 5.23% compared to Minerals Technologies' net margin of -3.13%. Cabot's return on equity of 20.29% beat Minerals Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cabot	5.23%	20.29%	9.01%
Minerals Technologies	-3.13%	10.63%	5.20%

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 13 more articles in the media than Cabot. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 3 mentions for Cabot. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Cabot's score of 0.71 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cabot	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Minerals Technologies	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cabot pays an annual dividend of $1.89 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Cabot pays out 53.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Minerals Technologies pays out -22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cabot has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years and Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Cabot is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Cabot has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cabot beats Minerals Technologies on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Minerals Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MTX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MTX vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Minerals Technologies	Chemicals Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.09B	$11.19B	$4.83B	$23.01B
Dividend Yield	0.72%	2.91%	4.73%	3.68%
P/E Ratio	-30.95	38.28	25.78	27.98
Price / Sales	1.01	55.49	17,217.15	21.84
Price / Cash	7.88	14.92	24.50	19.25
Price / Book	1.19	3.23	9.96	4.69
Net Income	-$18.40M	$222.40M	$157.81M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.70%	-0.89%	0.01%	-1.12%
1 Month Performance	-6.88%	-3.18%	-3.36%	-5.10%
1 Year Performance	7.94%	17.38%	23.50%	7.73%

Minerals Technologies Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MTX Minerals Technologies	3.2186 of 5 stars	$67.15 +1.2%	$90.00 +34.0%	+7.9%	$2.09B	$2.07B	N/A	3,782
IOSP Innospec	3.3838 of 5 stars	$93.57 +1.1%	N/A	+27.3%	$2.30B	$1.84B	19.10	2,450	News Coverage Analyst Downgrade
UFPI UFP Industries	4.7389 of 5 stars	$81.54 +1.6%	$104.50 +28.2%	-13.8%	$4.71B	$6.23B	19.57	13,800	News Coverage Positive News
AVNT Avient	3.732 of 5 stars	$40.89 +1.1%	$46.71 +14.2%	+26.0%	$3.75B	$3.26B	22.10	9,000
BC Brunswick	4.2104 of 5 stars	$67.26 +1.9%	$88.00 +30.8%	+5.8%	$4.36B	$5.36B	N/A	14,000	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MTX) was last updated on 9/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Minerals Technologies (MTX) Competitors

MTX vs. IOSP, UFPI, AVNT, BC, and CBT

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Innospec?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to UFP Industries?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Avient?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Brunswick?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Cabot?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MTX vs. The Competition

Minerals Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Minerals Technologies (MTX) Competitors

MTX vs. IOSP, UFPI, AVNT, BC, and CBT

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Innospec?

Do analysts prefer IOSP or MTX?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, IOSP or MTX?

Does the media favor IOSP or MTX?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in IOSP or MTX?

Is IOSP or MTX a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, IOSP or MTX?

Is IOSP or MTX more profitable?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to UFP Industries?

Which has more volatility and risk, UFPI or MTX?

Is UFPI or MTX a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to UFPI or MTX?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of UFPI or MTX?

Do analysts rate UFPI or MTX?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, UFPI or MTX?

Is UFPI or MTX more profitable?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Avient?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MTX or AVNT?

Is MTX or AVNT more profitable?

Do analysts prefer MTX or AVNT?

Which has more volatility and risk, MTX or AVNT?

Is MTX or AVNT a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to MTX or AVNT?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, MTX or AVNT?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Brunswick?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in MTX or BC?

Which has more volatility & risk, MTX or BC?

Is MTX or BC more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, MTX or BC?

Does the media refer more to MTX or BC?

Do analysts recommend MTX or BC?

Is MTX or BC a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Cabot?

Do analysts recommend CBT or MTX?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CBT or MTX?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CBT or MTX?

Is CBT or MTX more profitable?

Does the media prefer CBT or MTX?

Is CBT or MTX a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, CBT or MTX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MTX vs. The Competition

Minerals Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools