Skip to main content
NYSE:MTX

Minerals Technologies Competitors

$84.04
+0.68 (+0.82 %)
(As of 05/14/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$83.05
$84.86
50-Day Range
$74.53
$83.36
52-Week Range
$40.81
$84.86
Volume88,206 shs
Average Volume136,680 shs
Market Capitalization$2.83 billion
P/E Ratio26.26
Dividend Yield0.24%
Beta1.47

Competitors

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) Vs. SHW, ECL, IFF, ALB, CE, and RPM

Should you be buying MTX stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "specialty chemicals" are considered alternatives and competitors to Minerals Technologies, including The Sherwin-Williams (SHW), Ecolab (ECL), International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF), Albemarle (ALB), Celanese (CE), and RPM International (RPM).

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and The Sherwin-Williams (NYSE:SHW) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. The Sherwin-Williams pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Minerals Technologies pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Sherwin-Williams pays out 10.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Minerals Technologies and The Sherwin-Williams' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Minerals Technologies$1.79 billion1.58$132.70 million$4.2319.87
The Sherwin-Williams$17.90 billion4.25$1.54 billion$21.1213.55

The Sherwin-Williams has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. The Sherwin-Williams is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Minerals Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Minerals Technologies and The Sherwin-Williams, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Minerals Technologies01302.75
The Sherwin-Williams121502.78

Minerals Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $67.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 19.48%. The Sherwin-Williams has a consensus price target of $309.9412, suggesting a potential upside of 8.34%. Given The Sherwin-Williams' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe The Sherwin-Williams is more favorable than Minerals Technologies.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

94.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.5% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Minerals Technologies and The Sherwin-Williams' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Minerals Technologies6.88%9.20%4.26%
The Sherwin-Williams10.41%56.69%10.66%

Summary

The Sherwin-Williams beats Minerals Technologies on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and Ecolab (NYSE:ECL) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ecolab has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Ecolab pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Minerals Technologies pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ecolab pays out 33.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Ecolab has increased its dividend for 36 consecutive years. Ecolab is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Minerals Technologies and Ecolab's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Minerals Technologies$1.79 billion1.58$132.70 million$4.2319.87
Ecolab$14.91 billion4.30$1.56 billion$5.8238.50

Ecolab has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ecolab, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Minerals Technologies and Ecolab, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Minerals Technologies01302.75
Ecolab07702.50

Minerals Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $67.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 19.48%. Ecolab has a consensus price target of $228.70, suggesting a potential upside of 2.07%. Given Ecolab's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ecolab is more favorable than Minerals Technologies.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

94.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.6% of Ecolab shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Ecolab shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Minerals Technologies and Ecolab's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Minerals Technologies6.88%9.20%4.26%
Ecolab-8.21%18.14%6.75%

Summary

Ecolab beats Minerals Technologies on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and International Flavors & Fragrances (NYSE:IFF) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, International Flavors & Fragrances has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. International Flavors & Fragrances pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Minerals Technologies pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Flavors & Fragrances pays out 49.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and International Flavors & Fragrances has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years. International Flavors & Fragrances is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Minerals Technologies and International Flavors & Fragrances' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Minerals Technologies$1.79 billion1.58$132.70 million$4.2319.87
International Flavors & Fragrances$5.14 billion6.84$455.87 million$6.1722.89

International Flavors & Fragrances has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Flavors & Fragrances, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Minerals Technologies and International Flavors & Fragrances, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Minerals Technologies01302.75
International Flavors & Fragrances031002.77

Minerals Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $67.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 19.48%. International Flavors & Fragrances has a consensus price target of $147.5385, suggesting a potential upside of 4.48%. Given International Flavors & Fragrances' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe International Flavors & Fragrances is more favorable than Minerals Technologies.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

94.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.4% of International Flavors & Fragrances shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of International Flavors & Fragrances shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Minerals Technologies and International Flavors & Fragrances' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Minerals Technologies6.88%9.20%4.26%
International Flavors & Fragrances7.44%11.00%5.10%

Summary

International Flavors & Fragrances beats Minerals Technologies on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and Albemarle (NYSE:ALB) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Albemarle has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its share price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Minerals Technologies and Albemarle's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Minerals Technologies6.88%9.20%4.26%
Albemarle11.77%11.96%4.97%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Minerals Technologies and Albemarle's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Minerals Technologies$1.79 billion1.58$132.70 million$4.2319.87
Albemarle$3.59 billion5.33$533.23 million$6.0427.12

Albemarle has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Albemarle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Minerals Technologies and Albemarle, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Minerals Technologies01302.75
Albemarle371002.35

Minerals Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $67.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 19.48%. Albemarle has a consensus price target of $142.1429, suggesting a potential downside of 13.23%. Given Albemarle's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Albemarle is more favorable than Minerals Technologies.

Dividends

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Albemarle pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Minerals Technologies pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Albemarle pays out 25.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Albemarle has increased its dividend for 27 consecutive years. Albemarle is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

94.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.4% of Albemarle shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Albemarle shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Albemarle beats Minerals Technologies on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and Celanese (NYSE:CE) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and valuation.

Volatility & Risk

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.47, meaning that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Celanese has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Minerals Technologies and Celanese's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Minerals Technologies6.88%9.20%4.26%
Celanese10.46%31.41%9.42%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Minerals Technologies and Celanese's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Minerals Technologies$1.79 billion1.58$132.70 million$4.2319.87
Celanese$6.30 billion2.99$852 million$9.5317.54

Celanese has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Celanese is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Minerals Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Minerals Technologies and Celanese, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Minerals Technologies01302.75
Celanese151102.59

Minerals Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $67.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 19.48%. Celanese has a consensus price target of $156.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 6.29%. Given Celanese's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Celanese is more favorable than Minerals Technologies.

Dividends

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Celanese pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Minerals Technologies pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Celanese pays out 28.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Celanese has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

94.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.5% of Celanese shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Celanese shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Celanese beats Minerals Technologies on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and RPM International (NYSE:RPM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and valuation.

Volatility & Risk

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.47, meaning that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RPM International has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Minerals Technologies and RPM International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Minerals Technologies6.88%9.20%4.26%
RPM International7.50%35.72%8.85%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Minerals Technologies and RPM International's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Minerals Technologies$1.79 billion1.58$132.70 million$4.2319.87
RPM International$5.51 billion2.28$304.39 million$3.0731.59

RPM International has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RPM International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Minerals Technologies and RPM International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Minerals Technologies01302.75
RPM International04502.56

Minerals Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $67.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 19.48%. RPM International has a consensus price target of $96.8750, suggesting a potential downside of 0.11%. Given RPM International's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe RPM International is more favorable than Minerals Technologies.

Dividends

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. RPM International pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Minerals Technologies pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RPM International pays out 49.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and RPM International has increased its dividend for 19 consecutive years. RPM International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

94.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.7% of RPM International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of RPM International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

RPM International beats Minerals Technologies on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.


Minerals Technologies Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
The Sherwin-Williams logo
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams
2.1$286.09+0.1%$76.09 billion$17.90 billion14.12
Ecolab logo
ECL
Ecolab
2.2$224.06+1.2%$64.07 billion$14.91 billion-60.72Insider Selling
International Flavors & Fragrances logo
IFF
International Flavors & Fragrances
2.5$141.21+1.8%$35.15 billion$5.14 billion42.28Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
News Coverage
Albemarle logo
ALB
Albemarle
2.1$163.81+3.7%$19.12 billion$3.59 billion45.76Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Down
Celanese logo
CE
Celanese
2.2$167.19+0.3%$18.83 billion$6.30 billion34.61
RPM International logo
RPM
RPM International
2.3$96.98+0.1%$12.56 billion$5.51 billion29.39Analyst Report
Ashland Global logo
ASH
Ashland Global
1.8$89.06+3.7%$5.41 billion$2.33 billion-10.60Gap Down
W. R. Grace & Co. logo
GRA
W. R. Grace & Co.
2.2$68.36+0.1%$4.53 billion$1.96 billion325.52Analyst Downgrade
Balchem logo
BCPC
Balchem
1.6$133.25+0.0%$4.32 billion$643.71 million52.26
Quaker Chemical logo
KWR
Quaker Chemical
2.4$234.74+1.1%$4.20 billion$1.13 billion652.07Dividend Announcement
Insider Selling
Analyst Revision
NewMarket logo
NEU
NewMarket
1.0$352.77+1.3%$3.86 billion$2.19 billion15.36
Sensient Technologies logo
SXT
Sensient Technologies
1.8$85.66+0.9%$3.62 billion$1.32 billion53.87
H.B. Fuller logo
FUL
H.B. Fuller
2.0$69.08+0.9%$3.61 billion$2.90 billion31.40Insider Selling
Stepan logo
SCL
Stepan
2.2$137.25+0.1%$3.09 billion$1.86 billion26.91Insider Selling
Innospec logo
IOSP
Innospec
1.8$101.00+0.0%$2.49 billion$1.51 billion67.79Insider Selling
News Coverage
Ferro logo
FOE
Ferro
1.2$21.80+0.6%$1.80 billion$1.02 billion-363.27Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Kraton logo
KRA
Kraton
1.3$35.17+1.1%$1.13 billion$1.80 billion-4.94
FutureFuel logo
FF
FutureFuel
1.3$14.91+1.1%$652.21 million$205.23 million5.73Dividend Announcement
Unusual Options Activity
Landec logo
LNDC
Landec
1.8$12.17+3.4%$356.98 million$590.37 million-6.99Gap Down
Flotek Industries logo
FTK
Flotek Industries
0.6$1.85+2.7%$134.55 million$119.35 million-0.73Earnings Announcement
Gap Up
Advanced Emissions Solutions logo
ADES
Advanced Emissions Solutions
0.9$5.25+1.0%$98.99 million$70.09 million-7.95Earnings Announcement
This page was last updated on 5/16/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more about MarketBeat.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.