Do analysts recommend IOSP or MTX?

Minerals Technologies has a consensus target price of $90.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.16%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Innospec. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Innospec 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Minerals Technologies 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media prefer IOSP or MTX?

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Innospec. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 4 mentions for Innospec. Innospec's average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 1.37 indicating that Innospec is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Innospec 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Minerals Technologies 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor UFPI or MTX?

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than UFP Industries. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 4 mentions for UFP Industries. UFP Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 1.37 indicating that UFP Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment UFP Industries 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Minerals Technologies 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor AVNT or MTX?

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Avient. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 6 mentions for Avient. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Avient's score of 0.77 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Avient 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Minerals Technologies 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to BC or MTX?

In the previous week, Brunswick had 1 more articles in the media than Minerals Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Brunswick and 7 mentions for Minerals Technologies. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 1.37 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Brunswick 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Minerals Technologies 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer MTX or CBT?

In the previous week, Cabot had 7 more articles in the media than Minerals Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Cabot and 7 mentions for Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Cabot's score of 1.02 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Minerals Technologies 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cabot 12 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Minerals Technologies (MTX) Competitors

$71.91 +0.15 (+0.21%)

As of 09/4/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

Compare

MTX vs. IOSP, UFPI, AVNT, BC, and CBT

Should you buy Minerals Technologies stock or one of its competitors? Minerals Technologies's main competitors and comparable companies include Innospec (IOSP), UFP Industries (UFPI), Avient (AVNT), Brunswick (BC), and Cabot (CBT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Innospec?

Innospec (NASDAQ:IOSP) and Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Innospec pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Innospec pays out 37.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Minerals Technologies pays out -22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Innospec has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years and Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Innospec is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Innospec. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 4 mentions for Innospec. Innospec's average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 1.37 indicating that Innospec is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Innospec	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Minerals Technologies	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Innospec has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Innospec has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Innospec, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Innospec	$1.78B	1.30	$116.60M	$4.90	19.17
Minerals Technologies	$2.07B	1.08	-$18.40M	-$2.17	N/A

Innospec has a net margin of 6.60% compared to Minerals Technologies' net margin of -3.13%. Minerals Technologies' return on equity of 10.63% beat Innospec's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Innospec	6.60%	9.22%	6.74%
Minerals Technologies	-3.13%	10.63%	5.20%

Minerals Technologies has a consensus target price of $90.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.16%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Innospec.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Innospec	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Minerals Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

96.6% of Innospec shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Innospec shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Innospec and Minerals Technologies tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to UFP Industries?

UFP Industries (NASDAQ:UFPI) and Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

UFP Industries has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than UFP Industries. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 4 mentions for UFP Industries. UFP Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 1.37 indicating that UFP Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
UFP Industries	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Minerals Technologies	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

UFP Industries currently has a consensus price target of $104.50, suggesting a potential upside of 23.84%. Minerals Technologies has a consensus price target of $90.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.16%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than UFP Industries.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
UFP Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Minerals Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

UFP Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. UFP Industries pays out 33.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Minerals Technologies pays out -22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. UFP Industries has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Minerals Technologies has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. UFP Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

81.8% of UFP Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of UFP Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

UFP Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UFP Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
UFP Industries	$6.23B	0.75	$294.79M	$4.36	19.35
Minerals Technologies	$2.07B	1.08	-$18.40M	-$2.17	N/A

UFP Industries has a net margin of 3.99% compared to Minerals Technologies' net margin of -3.13%. Minerals Technologies' return on equity of 10.63% beat UFP Industries' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
UFP Industries	3.99%	8.00%	6.11%
Minerals Technologies	-3.13%	10.63%	5.20%

Summary

UFP Industries beats Minerals Technologies on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Avient?

Avient (NYSE:AVNT) and Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Avient has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Avient	$3.26B	1.22	$81.90M	$1.85	23.49
Minerals Technologies	$2.07B	1.08	-$18.40M	-$2.17	N/A

Avient has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Avient presently has a consensus price target of $46.71, indicating a potential upside of 7.51%. Minerals Technologies has a consensus price target of $90.00, indicating a potential upside of 25.16%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Avient.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Avient	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Minerals Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Avient. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 6 mentions for Avient. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Avient's score of 0.77 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Avient	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Minerals Technologies	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Avient pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Avient pays out 59.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Minerals Technologies pays out -22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Avient has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Minerals Technologies has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

95.5% of Avient shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Avient shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Avient has a net margin of 5.10% compared to Minerals Technologies' net margin of -3.13%. Avient's return on equity of 11.64% beat Minerals Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Avient	5.10%	11.64%	4.67%
Minerals Technologies	-3.13%	10.63%	5.20%

Summary

Avient beats Minerals Technologies on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Brunswick?

Brunswick (NYSE:BC) and Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Brunswick pays out -134.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Minerals Technologies pays out -22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Brunswick has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Brunswick has a net margin of -1.53% compared to Minerals Technologies' net margin of -3.13%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat Minerals Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Brunswick	-1.53%	15.28%	4.60%
Minerals Technologies	-3.13%	10.63%	5.20%

Brunswick presently has a consensus target price of $88.00, indicating a potential upside of 18.26%. Minerals Technologies has a consensus target price of $90.00, indicating a potential upside of 25.16%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Brunswick.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Brunswick	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Minerals Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Brunswick had 1 more articles in the media than Minerals Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Brunswick and 7 mentions for Minerals Technologies. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat Minerals Technologies' score of 1.37 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Brunswick	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Minerals Technologies	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Minerals Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Minerals Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Brunswick	$5.36B	0.90	-$137.30M	-$1.31	N/A
Minerals Technologies	$2.07B	1.08	-$18.40M	-$2.17	N/A

Summary

Brunswick beats Minerals Technologies on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Cabot?

Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) and Cabot (NYSE:CBT) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Cabot pays an annual dividend of $1.89 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Minerals Technologies pays out -22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cabot pays out 53.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Minerals Technologies has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Cabot has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Cabot is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Cabot had 7 more articles in the media than Minerals Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Cabot and 7 mentions for Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Cabot's score of 1.02 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Minerals Technologies	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cabot	12 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cabot has higher revenue and earnings than Minerals Technologies. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cabot, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Minerals Technologies	$2.07B	1.08	-$18.40M	-$2.17	N/A
Cabot	$3.71B	1.13	$331M	$3.55	22.95

Minerals Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $90.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.16%. Cabot has a consensus price target of $89.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.24%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Cabot.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Minerals Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Cabot	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.14

97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Cabot shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Cabot shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cabot has a net margin of 5.23% compared to Minerals Technologies' net margin of -3.13%. Cabot's return on equity of 20.29% beat Minerals Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Minerals Technologies	-3.13%	10.63%	5.20%
Cabot	5.23%	20.29%	9.01%

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cabot has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cabot beats Minerals Technologies on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Minerals Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MTX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MTX vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Minerals Technologies	Chemicals Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.24B	$11.57B	$5.03B	$23.59B
Dividend Yield	0.67%	2.82%	4.67%	3.73%
P/E Ratio	-33.14	38.81	25.82	29.33
Price / Sales	1.08	50.40	5,325.45	20.96
Price / Cash	8.44	15.18	24.69	19.95
Price / Book	1.28	3.30	10.67	4.83
Net Income	-$18.40M	$222.40M	$158.16M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	1.30%	-0.08%	-0.05%	0.43%
1 Month Performance	-4.31%	0.43%	9.64%	-0.78%
1 Year Performance	12.30%	17.51%	42.51%	12.82%

Minerals Technologies Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MTX Minerals Technologies	3.1954 of 5 stars	$71.91 +0.2%	$90.00 +25.2%	+12.3%	$2.24B	$2.07B	N/A	3,782	Positive News Gap Down
IOSP Innospec	3.4289 of 5 stars	$93.86 -1.6%	N/A	+9.6%	$2.35B	$1.78B	19.16	2,450	Positive News
UFPI UFP Industries	4.7153 of 5 stars	$84.52 -1.7%	$104.50 +23.6%	-18.7%	$4.74B	$6.23B	19.39	13,800
AVNT Avient	3.6364 of 5 stars	$44.02 -1.5%	$46.71 +6.1%	+15.2%	$4.10B	$3.26B	23.79	9,000	Positive News Analyst Downgrade
BC Brunswick	4.4099 of 5 stars	$75.84 -1.0%	$88.00 +16.0%	+11.9%	$4.97B	$5.36B	N/A	14,000	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MTX) was last updated on 9/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Minerals Technologies (MTX) Competitors

MTX vs. IOSP, UFPI, AVNT, BC, and CBT

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Innospec?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to UFP Industries?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Avient?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Brunswick?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Cabot?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MTX vs. The Competition

Minerals Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Minerals Technologies (MTX) Competitors

MTX vs. IOSP, UFPI, AVNT, BC, and CBT

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Innospec?

Is IOSP or MTX a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer IOSP or MTX?

Which has more risk & volatility, IOSP or MTX?

Which has better valuation & earnings, IOSP or MTX?

Is IOSP or MTX more profitable?

Do analysts recommend IOSP or MTX?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in IOSP or MTX?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to UFP Industries?

Which has more risk & volatility, UFPI or MTX?

Does the media favor UFPI or MTX?

Do analysts recommend UFPI or MTX?

Is UFPI or MTX a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of UFPI or MTX?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, UFPI or MTX?

Is UFPI or MTX more profitable?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Avient?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, AVNT or MTX?

Which has more risk and volatility, AVNT or MTX?

Do analysts recommend AVNT or MTX?

Does the media favor AVNT or MTX?

Is AVNT or MTX a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in AVNT or MTX?

Is AVNT or MTX more profitable?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Brunswick?

Is BC or MTX a better dividend stock?

Is BC or MTX more profitable?

Do analysts recommend BC or MTX?

Does the media refer more to BC or MTX?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in BC or MTX?

Which has more volatility and risk, BC or MTX?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, BC or MTX?

Summary

How does Minerals Technologies compare to Cabot?

Is MTX or CBT a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer MTX or CBT?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MTX or CBT?

Do analysts prefer MTX or CBT?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of MTX or CBT?

Is MTX or CBT more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, MTX or CBT?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MTX vs. The Competition

Minerals Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools