Innovative Industrial Properties Competitors

Brookfield Property Partners (NASDAQ:BPY) and Innovative Industrial Properties (NYSE:IIPR) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

46.7% of Brookfield Property Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.9% of Innovative Industrial Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Innovative Industrial Properties shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Brookfield Property Partners pays an annual dividend of $1.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.4%. Innovative Industrial Properties pays an annual dividend of $5.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Innovative Industrial Properties pays out 161.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brookfield Property Partners has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Innovative Industrial Properties has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Risk and Volatility

Brookfield Property Partners has a beta of 1.52, meaning that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Innovative Industrial Properties has a beta of 1.52, meaning that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Brookfield Property Partners and Innovative Industrial Properties' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Brookfield Property Partners and Innovative Industrial Properties, as provided by MarketBeat.

Brookfield Property Partners presently has a consensus price target of $15.5625, suggesting a potential downside of 13.11%. Innovative Industrial Properties has a consensus price target of $192.4286, suggesting a potential upside of 4.05%. Given Innovative Industrial Properties' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Innovative Industrial Properties is more favorable than Brookfield Property Partners.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Brookfield Property Partners and Innovative Industrial Properties' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Brookfield Property Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Innovative Industrial Properties.

Summary

Innovative Industrial Properties beats Brookfield Property Partners on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

FirstService (NASDAQ:FSV) and Innovative Industrial Properties (NYSE:IIPR) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Profitability

This table compares FirstService and Innovative Industrial Properties' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

FirstService pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Innovative Industrial Properties pays an annual dividend of $5.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. FirstService pays out -10.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Innovative Industrial Properties pays out 161.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. FirstService has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Innovative Industrial Properties has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares FirstService and Innovative Industrial Properties' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Innovative Industrial Properties has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FirstService. FirstService is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Innovative Industrial Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

FirstService has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its share price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Innovative Industrial Properties has a beta of 1.52, indicating that its share price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for FirstService and Innovative Industrial Properties, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

FirstService presently has a consensus target price of $145.00, indicating a potential downside of 12.03%. Innovative Industrial Properties has a consensus target price of $192.4286, indicating a potential upside of 4.05%. Given Innovative Industrial Properties' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Innovative Industrial Properties is more favorable than FirstService.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

69.5% of FirstService shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.9% of Innovative Industrial Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Innovative Industrial Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Innovative Industrial Properties beats FirstService on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Terreno Realty (NYSE:TRNO) and Innovative Industrial Properties (NYSE:IIPR) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Risk and Volatility

Terreno Realty has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Innovative Industrial Properties has a beta of 1.52, indicating that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Terreno Realty and Innovative Industrial Properties' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Terreno Realty has higher revenue and earnings than Innovative Industrial Properties. Terreno Realty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Innovative Industrial Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Terreno Realty and Innovative Industrial Properties, as reported by MarketBeat.

Terreno Realty presently has a consensus price target of $66.1667, indicating a potential upside of 7.43%. Innovative Industrial Properties has a consensus price target of $192.4286, indicating a potential upside of 4.05%. Given Terreno Realty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Terreno Realty is more favorable than Innovative Industrial Properties.

Profitability

This table compares Terreno Realty and Innovative Industrial Properties' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Terreno Realty pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Innovative Industrial Properties pays an annual dividend of $5.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Terreno Realty pays out 84.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Innovative Industrial Properties pays out 161.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Terreno Realty has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Innovative Industrial Properties has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

99.9% of Terreno Realty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.9% of Innovative Industrial Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Terreno Realty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Innovative Industrial Properties shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Innovative Industrial Properties beats Terreno Realty on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hudson Pacific Properties (NYSE:HPP) and Innovative Industrial Properties (NYSE:IIPR) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Hudson Pacific Properties and Innovative Industrial Properties' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Hudson Pacific Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Innovative Industrial Properties. Hudson Pacific Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Innovative Industrial Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Hudson Pacific Properties and Innovative Industrial Properties' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Hudson Pacific Properties and Innovative Industrial Properties, as provided by MarketBeat.

Hudson Pacific Properties presently has a consensus price target of $27.4375, suggesting a potential downside of 1.23%. Innovative Industrial Properties has a consensus price target of $192.4286, suggesting a potential upside of 4.05%. Given Innovative Industrial Properties' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Innovative Industrial Properties is more favorable than Hudson Pacific Properties.

Volatility & Risk

Hudson Pacific Properties has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Innovative Industrial Properties has a beta of 1.52, indicating that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

99.1% of Hudson Pacific Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.9% of Innovative Industrial Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Hudson Pacific Properties shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Innovative Industrial Properties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Hudson Pacific Properties pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Innovative Industrial Properties pays an annual dividend of $5.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Hudson Pacific Properties pays out 49.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Innovative Industrial Properties pays out 161.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hudson Pacific Properties has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Innovative Industrial Properties has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Hudson Pacific Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Innovative Industrial Properties beats Hudson Pacific Properties on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Colliers International Group (NASDAQ:CIGI) and Innovative Industrial Properties (NYSE:IIPR) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Dividends

Colliers International Group pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Innovative Industrial Properties pays an annual dividend of $5.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Colliers International Group pays out 3.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Innovative Industrial Properties pays out 161.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Colliers International Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Innovative Industrial Properties has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Innovative Industrial Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Colliers International Group and Innovative Industrial Properties' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Colliers International Group has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Innovative Industrial Properties has a beta of 1.52, meaning that its share price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Colliers International Group and Innovative Industrial Properties, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Colliers International Group currently has a consensus target price of $104.6667, indicating a potential downside of 0.63%. Innovative Industrial Properties has a consensus target price of $192.4286, indicating a potential upside of 4.05%. Given Innovative Industrial Properties' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Innovative Industrial Properties is more favorable than Colliers International Group.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

69.8% of Colliers International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.9% of Innovative Industrial Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.3% of Colliers International Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Innovative Industrial Properties shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Colliers International Group and Innovative Industrial Properties' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Colliers International Group has higher revenue and earnings than Innovative Industrial Properties. Colliers International Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Innovative Industrial Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Colliers International Group beats Innovative Industrial Properties on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cushman & Wakefield (NYSE:CWK) and Innovative Industrial Properties (NYSE:IIPR) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Cushman & Wakefield and Innovative Industrial Properties' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Innovative Industrial Properties has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cushman & Wakefield.

Volatility & Risk

Cushman & Wakefield has a beta of 1.52, suggesting that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Innovative Industrial Properties has a beta of 1.52, suggesting that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Cushman & Wakefield and Innovative Industrial Properties, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Cushman & Wakefield currently has a consensus price target of $16.4583, indicating a potential downside of 4.20%. Innovative Industrial Properties has a consensus price target of $192.4286, indicating a potential upside of 4.05%. Given Innovative Industrial Properties' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Innovative Industrial Properties is more favorable than Cushman & Wakefield.

Profitability

This table compares Cushman & Wakefield and Innovative Industrial Properties' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

72.2% of Cushman & Wakefield shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.9% of Innovative Industrial Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Cushman & Wakefield shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Innovative Industrial Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Innovative Industrial Properties beats Cushman & Wakefield on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.