Free Trial

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) Competitors

MFS Intermediate Income Trust logo
$2.46 -0.03 (-1.00%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$2.46 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

MIN vs. GSBD, MFIC, TYG, MYN, and BBDC

Should you be buying MFS Intermediate Income Trust stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of MFS Intermediate Income Trust include Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD), MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC), Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (TYG), BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (MYN), and Barings Bdc (BBDC). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) and Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and risk.

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 32.62% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 12.23% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/A N/A N/A
Goldman Sachs BDC 32.62%12.23%5.31%

Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus target price of $9.50, indicating a potential downside of 6.27%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Goldman Sachs BDC
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Goldman Sachs BDC. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and 2 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC. Goldman Sachs BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of -0.11 indicating that Goldman Sachs BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Goldman Sachs BDC
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.28, suggesting that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the S&P 500.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.6%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 123.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Goldman Sachs BDC$365.57M3.12$119.27M$1.049.75

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) and MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and risk.

MidCap Financial Investment has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
MidCap Financial Investment$320.88M3.14$63.17M$0.6618.53

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 19.69% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 10.43% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/A N/A N/A
MidCap Financial Investment 19.69%10.43%4.22%

MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 187.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.28, suggesting that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust had 1 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and 2 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. MidCap Financial Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of -0.11 indicating that MidCap Financial Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus target price of $11.54, indicating a potential downside of 5.68%. Given MidCap Financial Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe MidCap Financial Investment is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22

Summary

MidCap Financial Investment beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure?

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (NYSE:TYG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Tortoise Energy InfrastructureN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/A N/A N/A
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure N/A N/A N/A

MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $5.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%.

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.5% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its share price is 72% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its share price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and 1 mentions for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of -0.11 indicating that Tortoise Energy Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund?

BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (NYSE:MYN) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality FundN/A N/A N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust had 2 more articles in the media than BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and 1 mentions for BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund. BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of -0.11 indicating that BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its share price is 72% less volatile than the S&P 500.

29.3% of BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%.

Summary

BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund and MFS Intermediate Income Trust tied by winning 3 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Barings Bdc?

Barings Bdc (NYSE:BBDC) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Barings Bdc has a net margin of 36.50% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Barings Bdc's return on equity of 10.05% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Barings Bdc36.50% 10.05% 4.27%
MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Barings Bdc had 3 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Barings Bdc and 3 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Barings Bdc's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of -0.11 indicating that Barings Bdc is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Barings Bdc
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Barings Bdc currently has a consensus target price of $9.67, suggesting a potential upside of 4.90%. Given Barings Bdc's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Barings Bdc is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Barings Bdc
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Barings Bdc has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Barings Bdc$279.21M3.46$101.92M$0.979.50
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Barings Bdc has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.28, meaning that its share price is 72% less volatile than the S&P 500.

44.1% of Barings Bdc shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Barings Bdc shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Barings Bdc pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.3%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Barings Bdc pays out 107.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Barings Bdc has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Barings Bdc is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Barings Bdc beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get MFS Intermediate Income Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MIN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MIN vs. The Competition

MetricMFS Intermediate Income TrustFIN IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$283.36M$4.39B$13.34B$22.85B
Dividend Yield9.33%7.24%5.80%4.06%
P/E RatioN/A0.0622.4425.44
Price / SalesN/A50.92181.6824.24
Price / CashN/A5.4820.2425.18
Price / BookN/A3.313.435.37
Net IncomeN/A$388.27M$1.11B$1.07B
7 Day PerformanceN/A0.76%0.03%0.89%
1 Month Performance-0.32%3.82%4.66%6.56%
1 Year Performance-8.19%14.89%13.62%31.66%

MFS Intermediate Income Trust Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MIN
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
N/A$2.47
-1.0%
N/AN/A$283.36MN/AN/AN/A
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC
3.0546 of 5 stars
$9.78
+1.1%
$9.50
-2.8%
N/A$1.09B$365.57M9.40N/A
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
1.3305 of 5 stars
$11.58
+1.3%
$11.54
-0.4%
N/A$1.05B$320.88M17.55N/A
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
N/A$48.32
+1.2%
N/AN/A$1.01B$46.61MN/AN/A
MYN
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund
N/A$9.94
-0.1%
N/AN/A$936.53M$6.89MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:MIN) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners