Free Trial
→ I paid $5,000 to hear Elon say this (From InvestorPlace) (Ad)tc pixel Free MIN Stock Alerts

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) Competitors

MFS Intermediate Income Trust logo
$2.46 +0.01 (+0.20%)
Closing price 05/29/2026 03:58 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$2.46 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 05/29/2026 05:06 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

MIN vs. GSBD, TYG, MYN, BBDC, and OXLC

Should you buy MFS Intermediate Income Trust stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares MFS Intermediate Income Trust with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with MFS Intermediate Income Trust include Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD), Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (TYG), BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (MYN), Barings Bdc (BBDC), and Oxford Lane Capital (OXLC). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.3%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 196.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Goldman Sachs BDC$86.61M11.66$119.27M$0.6513.80
MFS Intermediate Income Trust$18.81M14.85N/AN/AN/A

Goldman Sachs BDC presently has a consensus price target of $9.17, indicating a potential upside of 2.17%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Goldman Sachs BDC
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 21.32% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 10.94% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Goldman Sachs BDC21.32% 10.94% 4.66%
MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Goldman Sachs BDC had 1 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC and 1 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Goldman Sachs BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of -1.00 indicating that Goldman Sachs BDC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Goldman Sachs BDC Positive
MFS Intermediate Income Trust Negative

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure?

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (NYSE:TYG) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability.

32.5% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.28, suggesting that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure and 1 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of -1.00 equaled MFS Intermediate Income Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Negative
MFS Intermediate Income Trust Negative

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tortoise Energy InfrastructureN/A N/A N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure$46.61M19.96N/AN/AN/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust$18.81M14.85N/AN/AN/A

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $5.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.8%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%.

Summary

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund?

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) and BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (NYSE:MYN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.28, meaning that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust and MFS Intermediate Income Trust both had 1 articles in the media. BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of -1.00 indicating that BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
MFS Intermediate Income Trust Negative
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund Neutral

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MFS Intermediate Income Trust$18.81M14.85N/AN/AN/A
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund$6.89M137.00N/AN/AN/A

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.3% of BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/A N/A N/A
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund N/A N/A N/A

MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%.

Summary

BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Barings Bdc?

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) and Barings Bdc (NYSE:BBDC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

Barings Bdc has a consensus price target of $9.50, indicating a potential upside of 9.38%. Given Barings Bdc's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Barings Bdc is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Barings Bdc
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. Barings Bdc pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.0%. Barings Bdc pays out 122.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Barings Bdc has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Barings Bdc is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.28, suggesting that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Barings Bdc has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Barings Bdc has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MFS Intermediate Income Trust$18.81M14.85N/AN/AN/A
Barings Bdc$101.66M8.95$101.92M$0.8510.22

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust and MFS Intermediate Income Trust both had 1 articles in the media. Barings Bdc's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of -1.00 indicating that Barings Bdc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
MFS Intermediate Income Trust Negative
Barings Bdc Positive

Barings Bdc has a net margin of 32.45% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Barings Bdc's return on equity of 10.08% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/A N/A N/A
Barings Bdc 32.45%10.08%4.33%

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.1% of Barings Bdc shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Barings Bdc shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Barings Bdc beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Oxford Lane Capital?

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) and Oxford Lane Capital (NASDAQ:OXLC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/A N/A N/A
Oxford Lane Capital N/A N/A N/A

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.7% of Oxford Lane Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Oxford Lane Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. Oxford Lane Capital pays an annual dividend of $4.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 43.6%. Oxford Lane Capital pays out 67.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Oxford Lane Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MFS Intermediate Income Trust$18.81M14.85N/AN/AN/A
Oxford Lane Capital-$580.18M-1.56$585.52M$6.461.54

In the previous week, Oxford Lane Capital had 3 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Oxford Lane Capital and 1 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Oxford Lane Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of -1.00 indicating that Oxford Lane Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
MFS Intermediate Income Trust Negative
Oxford Lane Capital Positive

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oxford Lane Capital has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Oxford Lane Capital beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get MFS Intermediate Income Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MIN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MIN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricMFS Intermediate Income TrustFIN IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$278.81M$4.80B$13.53B$23.16B
Dividend Yield9.49%6.90%5.76%4.07%
P/E RatioN/A0.0223.9930.61
Price / Sales14.8550.44147.6992.47
Price / CashN/A5.3820.1425.09
Price / BookN/A4.382.164.79
Net IncomeN/A$388.27M$1.13B$1.07B
7 Day Performance0.20%1.34%0.64%1.16%
1 Month Performance-1.21%0.83%0.43%1.28%
1 Year Performance-8.05%15.93%12.59%28.03%

MFS Intermediate Income Trust Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MIN
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
N/A$2.46
+0.2%		N/A-8.1%$278.81M$18.81MN/AN/A
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC
3.445 of 5 stars		$8.94
+0.7%		$9.17
+2.6%		-21.2%$1.01B$86.61M13.78N/A
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
N/A$45.41
-0.2%		N/A+9.2%$959.51MN/AN/AN/A
MYN
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund
N/A$9.95
+0.6%		N/A+5.4%$936.06M$6.89MN/AN/A
BBDC
Barings Bdc
3.6354 of 5 stars		$8.68
+0.9%		$9.50
+9.5%		-6.6%$909.38M$101.66M10.2226

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MIN) was last updated on 5/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
I paid $5,000 to hear Elon say this
One investor paid $5,000 to be in a private room with Elon Musk in Los Angeles - and what he heard confirmed a...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
This is the worst news for stocks in 50 years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are issuing a rare warning: what's ahead for U.S. stocks could be the worst e...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
This Tech Could Be Bigger Than Apple, Amazon, and Microsoft Combined
A breakthrough technology backed by Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang may hold the answer to ...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
One page of the SpaceX S-1 will move this stock overnight
When SpaceX files its S-1 in June, the SEC will require full disclosure of operating expenses - including powe...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Before you buy SpaceX shares, consider this alternative approach
SpaceX has confidentially filed for an IPO with the SEC, targeting a June 2026 listing at a valuation exceedin...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump just signed it
A recent policy development is drawing attention from income-focused investors. According to one analyst, c...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel