NYSE:MIN

MFS Intermediate Income Trust Competitors

$3.68

+0.02 (+0.55 %)

(As of 04/20/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$3.65

Now: $3.68▼

$3.69

50-Day Range

$3.61

MA: $3.69▼

$3.77

52-Week Range

$3.60

Now: $3.68▼

$3.95

Volume554,042 shs

Average Volume487,872 shs

Market Capitalization$426.63 million

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend Yield9.29%

Beta0.16

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) Vs. TYG, BIF, QQQX, HQH, AWF, and GAM

Should you be buying MIN stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "investment offices, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to MFS Intermediate Income Trust, including Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (TYG), Boulder Growth & Income Fund (BIF), Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX), Tekla Healthcare Investors (HQH), AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund (AWF), and General American Investors (GAM).

MFS Intermediate Income Trust vs. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Stock

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (NYSE:TYG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares MFS Intermediate Income Trust and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Insider and Institutional Ownership

51.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.7% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares MFS Intermediate Income Trust and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure	N/A	N/A	N/A

Risk and Volatility

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.16, meaning that its share price is 84% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 2.87, meaning that its share price is 187% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	0	0	0	0	N/A
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure	0	1	0	0	2.00

Dividends

MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust vs. Boulder Growth & Income Fund Stock

Boulder Growth & Income Fund (NYSE:BIF) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Boulder Growth & Income Fund and MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Boulder Growth & Income Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Boulder Growth & Income Fund and MFS Intermediate Income Trust's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Boulder Growth & Income Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Dividends

Boulder Growth & Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. Boulder Growth & Income Fund has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

12.1% of Boulder Growth & Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Boulder Growth & Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Boulder Growth & Income Fund has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.16, suggesting that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Boulder Growth & Income Fund and MFS Intermediate Income Trust, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Boulder Growth & Income Fund	0	0	0	0	N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	0	0	0	0	N/A

Summary

Boulder Growth & Income Fund beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust vs. Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund Stock

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (NASDAQ:QQQX) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.16, meaning that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares MFS Intermediate Income Trust and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A
Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	0	0	0	0	N/A
Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund	0	0	0	0	N/A

Institutional & Insider Ownership

51.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.7% of Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares MFS Intermediate Income Trust and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Dividends

MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%.

Summary

MFS Intermediate Income Trust beats Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust vs. Tekla Healthcare Investors Stock

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) and Tekla Healthcare Investors (NYSE:HQH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares MFS Intermediate Income Trust and Tekla Healthcare Investors' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Tekla Healthcare Investors	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and Tekla Healthcare Investors, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	0	0	0	0	N/A
Tekla Healthcare Investors	0	0	0	0	N/A

Institutional and Insider Ownership

51.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.2% of Tekla Healthcare Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of Tekla Healthcare Investors shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.16, suggesting that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tekla Healthcare Investors has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares MFS Intermediate Income Trust and Tekla Healthcare Investors' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A
Tekla Healthcare Investors	N/A	N/A	N/A

Dividends

MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. Tekla Healthcare Investors pays an annual dividend of $1.89 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.6%. Tekla Healthcare Investors has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Tekla Healthcare Investors beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust vs. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund Stock

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund (NYSE:AWF) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and earnings.

Dividends

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

51.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund and MFS Intermediate Income Trust, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund	0	0	0	0	N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	0	0	0	0	N/A

Volatility & Risk

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.16, meaning that its share price is 84% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund and MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund and MFS Intermediate Income Trust's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust vs. General American Investors Stock

General American Investors (NYSE:GAM) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Dividends

General American Investors pays an annual dividend of $2.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for General American Investors and MFS Intermediate Income Trust, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
General American Investors	0	0	0	0	N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	0	0	0	0	N/A

Profitability

This table compares General American Investors and MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
General American Investors	N/A	N/A	N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares General American Investors and MFS Intermediate Income Trust's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
General American Investors	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Risk & Volatility

General American Investors has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.16, suggesting that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

23.0% of General American Investors shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 7.0% of General American Investors shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.