S&P 500   3,768.25
DOW   30,814.26
QQQ   311.86
pixel
S&P 500   3,768.25
DOW   30,814.26
QQQ   311.86
pixel
S&P 500   3,768.25
DOW   30,814.26
QQQ   311.86
pixel
S&P 500   3,768.25
DOW   30,814.26
QQQ   311.86
pixel
Log in
NYSE:MMC

Marsh & McLennan Companies Competitors

$111.84
-0.15 (-0.13 %)
(As of 01/15/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$111.06
Now: $111.84
$112.76
50-Day Range
$111.99
MA: $115.18
$118.69
52-Week Range
$74.33
Now: $111.84
$120.97
Volume2.53 million shs
Average Volume1.94 million shs
Market Capitalization$56.72 billion
P/E Ratio28.10
Dividend Yield1.66%
Beta0.86

Competitors

Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MMC) Vs. AON, WLTW, AJG, BRO, EQH, and ERIE

Should you be buying MMC stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "insurance agents, brokers, & service" are considered alternatives and competitors to Marsh & McLennan Companies, including AON (AON), Willis Towers Watson Public (WLTW), Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG), Brown & Brown (BRO), Equitable (EQH), and Erie Indemnity (ERIE).

Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MMC) and AON (NYSE:AON) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AON has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

86.6% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.7% of AON shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of AON shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $1.86 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. AON pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 39.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AON pays out 20.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marsh & McLennan Companies has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years and AON has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years. Marsh & McLennan Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Marsh & McLennan Companies and AON's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Marsh & McLennan Companies11.91%31.20%7.96%
AON16.56%65.00%7.41%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Marsh & McLennan Companies and AON, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Marsh & McLennan Companies27702.31
AON15702.46

Marsh & McLennan Companies presently has a consensus target price of $117.7059, indicating a potential upside of 5.24%. AON has a consensus target price of $213.75, indicating a potential upside of 2.80%. Given Marsh & McLennan Companies' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Marsh & McLennan Companies is more favorable than AON.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Marsh & McLennan Companies and AON's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marsh & McLennan Companies$16.65 billion3.41$1.74 billion$4.6624.00
AON$11.01 billion4.32$1.53 billion$9.1722.68

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than AON. AON is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marsh & McLennan Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MMC) and Willis Towers Watson Public (NASDAQ:WLTW) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Willis Towers Watson Public has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

86.6% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.3% of Willis Towers Watson Public shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Willis Towers Watson Public shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $1.86 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Willis Towers Watson Public pays an annual dividend of $2.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 39.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Willis Towers Watson Public pays out 25.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marsh & McLennan Companies has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Willis Towers Watson Public has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Marsh & McLennan Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Marsh & McLennan Companies and Willis Towers Watson Public's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Marsh & McLennan Companies11.91%31.20%7.96%
Willis Towers Watson Public11.00%14.32%4.02%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Marsh & McLennan Companies and Willis Towers Watson Public, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Marsh & McLennan Companies27702.31
Willis Towers Watson Public09402.31

Marsh & McLennan Companies presently has a consensus target price of $117.7059, indicating a potential upside of 5.24%. Willis Towers Watson Public has a consensus target price of $215.9231, indicating a potential upside of 4.49%. Given Marsh & McLennan Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Marsh & McLennan Companies is more favorable than Willis Towers Watson Public.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Marsh & McLennan Companies and Willis Towers Watson Public's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marsh & McLennan Companies$16.65 billion3.41$1.74 billion$4.6624.00
Willis Towers Watson Public$9.04 billion2.95$1.04 billion$10.9618.85

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Willis Towers Watson Public. Willis Towers Watson Public is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marsh & McLennan Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Marsh & McLennan Companies beats Willis Towers Watson Public on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MMC) and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (NYSE:AJG) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $1.86 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 39.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. pays out 49.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marsh & McLennan Companies has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Marsh & McLennan Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Marsh & McLennan Companies and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marsh & McLennan Companies$16.65 billion3.41$1.74 billion$4.6624.00
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.$7.20 billion3.10$668.80 million$3.6531.81

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. Marsh & McLennan Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

86.6% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.0% of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Marsh & McLennan Companies and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Marsh & McLennan Companies11.91%31.20%7.96%
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.11.04%16.19%4.19%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Marsh & McLennan Companies and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Marsh & McLennan Companies27702.31
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.15702.46

Marsh & McLennan Companies presently has a consensus target price of $117.7059, indicating a potential upside of 5.24%. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a consensus target price of $124.1429, indicating a potential upside of 6.92%. Given Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. is more favorable than Marsh & McLennan Companies.

Summary

Marsh & McLennan Companies beats Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MMC) and Brown & Brown (NYSE:BRO) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brown & Brown has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its share price is 34% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $1.86 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Brown & Brown pays an annual dividend of $0.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 39.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brown & Brown pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marsh & McLennan Companies has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Brown & Brown has increased its dividend for 20 consecutive years.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Marsh & McLennan Companies and Brown & Brown's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marsh & McLennan Companies$16.65 billion3.41$1.74 billion$4.6624.00
Brown & Brown$2.39 billion5.50$398.51 million$1.4033.07

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Brown & Brown. Marsh & McLennan Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brown & Brown, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

86.6% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.1% of Brown & Brown shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.1% of Brown & Brown shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Marsh & McLennan Companies and Brown & Brown's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Marsh & McLennan Companies11.91%31.20%7.96%
Brown & Brown18.02%13.26%5.81%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Marsh & McLennan Companies and Brown & Brown, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Marsh & McLennan Companies27702.31
Brown & Brown06402.40

Marsh & McLennan Companies currently has a consensus target price of $117.7059, indicating a potential upside of 5.24%. Brown & Brown has a consensus target price of $47.75, indicating a potential upside of 3.13%. Given Marsh & McLennan Companies' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Marsh & McLennan Companies is more favorable than Brown & Brown.

Summary

Marsh & McLennan Companies beats Brown & Brown on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MMC) and Equitable (NYSE:EQH) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Equitable has a beta of 1.65, meaning that its share price is 65% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $1.86 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Equitable pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 39.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Equitable pays out 14.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marsh & McLennan Companies has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Equitable has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Equitable is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Marsh & McLennan Companies and Equitable's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marsh & McLennan Companies$16.65 billion3.41$1.74 billion$4.6624.00
Equitable$9.59 billion1.28$2.16 billion$4.855.67

Equitable has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Marsh & McLennan Companies. Equitable is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marsh & McLennan Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

86.6% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.9% of Equitable shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Equitable shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Marsh & McLennan Companies and Equitable's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Marsh & McLennan Companies11.91%31.20%7.96%
EquitableN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Marsh & McLennan Companies and Equitable, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Marsh & McLennan Companies27702.31
Equitable00703.00

Marsh & McLennan Companies currently has a consensus target price of $117.7059, indicating a potential upside of 5.24%. Equitable has a consensus target price of $27.8889, indicating a potential upside of 1.41%. Given Marsh & McLennan Companies' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Marsh & McLennan Companies is more favorable than Equitable.

Summary

Marsh & McLennan Companies beats Equitable on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MMC) and Erie Indemnity (NASDAQ:ERIE) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $1.86 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Erie Indemnity pays an annual dividend of $4.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 39.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 68.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marsh & McLennan Companies has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Erie Indemnity has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Marsh & McLennan Companies and Erie Indemnity's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marsh & McLennan Companies$16.65 billion3.41$1.74 billion$4.6624.00
Erie Indemnity$2.48 billion4.62$316.82 million$6.0640.91

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Erie Indemnity. Marsh & McLennan Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Erie Indemnity, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

86.6% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.0% of Erie Indemnity shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 45.8% of Erie Indemnity shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Marsh & McLennan Companies and Erie Indemnity's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Marsh & McLennan Companies11.91%31.20%7.96%
Erie Indemnity11.49%24.73%14.12%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Marsh & McLennan Companies and Erie Indemnity, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Marsh & McLennan Companies27702.31
Erie Indemnity00103.00

Marsh & McLennan Companies currently has a consensus target price of $117.7059, indicating a potential upside of 5.24%. Given Marsh & McLennan Companies' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Marsh & McLennan Companies is more favorable than Erie Indemnity.

Summary

Marsh & McLennan Companies beats Erie Indemnity on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.


Marsh & McLennan Companies Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
AON logo
AON
AON
1.9$207.93-0.6%$47.54 billion$11.01 billion26.83Dividend Announcement
Analyst Revision
Willis Towers Watson Public logo
WLTW
Willis Towers Watson Public
1.5$206.65-0.6%$26.64 billion$9.04 billion26.43
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. logo
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
1.9$116.11-0.1%$22.33 billion$7.20 billion29.10
Brown & Brown logo
BRO
Brown & Brown
2.0$46.30-1.2%$13.15 billion$2.39 billion28.58Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Upgrade
Equitable logo
EQH
Equitable
1.9$27.50-1.4%$12.19 billion$9.59 billion-26.19Analyst Report
Erie Indemnity logo
ERIE
Erie Indemnity
1.4$247.90-0.7%$11.45 billion$2.48 billion44.67
Goosehead Insurance logo
GSHD
Goosehead Insurance
1.4$136.54-2.1%$5.01 billion$77.49 million296.83
GOCO
GoHealth
1.6$15.00-1.2%$4.70 billionN/A0.00
SLQT
SelectQuote
1.7$23.54-3.8%$3.65 billion$531.52 million-147.13Analyst Report
CorVel logo
CRVL
CorVel
0.8$105.51-0.1%$1.89 billion$592.22 million46.89
eHealth logo
EHTH
eHealth
1.8$71.06-0.8%$1.82 billion$506.20 million23.45
BRP
BRP Group
1.9$26.92-1.6%$914.96 million$137.84 million-39.01
Fanhua logo
FANH
Fanhua
1.5$13.53-1.1%$879.59 million$532.33 million-1,351.65
HUIZ
Huize
0.4$6.75-0.6%$350.45 million$142.68 million675.68
This page was last updated on 1/18/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.