Question 1

Do analysts prefer AON or MRSH?

Accepted Answer

AON presently has a consensus target price of $410.75, indicating a potential upside of 17.93%. Marsh & McLennan Companies has a consensus target price of $201.94, indicating a potential upside of 7.88%. Given AON's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe AON is more favorable than Marsh & McLennan Companies. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score AON 0 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 12 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.71 Marsh & McLennan Companies 1 Sell rating(s) 11 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Question 2

Is AON or MRSH a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

AON pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $3.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. AON pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marsh & McLennan Companies has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Marsh & McLennan Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Question 3

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, AON or MRSH?

Accepted Answer

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than AON. AON is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marsh & McLennan Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio AON $17.18B 4.30 $3.70B $18.14 19.20 Marsh & McLennan Companies $26.98B 3.31 $4.16B $8.18 22.88

Question 4

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of AON or MRSH?

Accepted Answer

86.1% of AON shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.0% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of AON shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Question 5

Is AON or MRSH more profitable?

Accepted Answer

AON has a net margin of 22.27% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies' net margin of 14.24%. AON's return on equity of 42.13% beat Marsh & McLennan Companies' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets AON 22.27% 42.13% 7.57% Marsh & McLennan Companies 14.24% 32.67% 8.44%

Question 6

Which has more risk and volatility, AON or MRSH?

Accepted Answer

AON has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Question 7

Does the media prefer AON or MRSH?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, Marsh & McLennan Companies had 12 more articles in the media than AON. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Marsh & McLennan Companies and 25 mentions for AON. Marsh & McLennan Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat AON's score of 0.23 indicating that Marsh & McLennan Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment AON 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Marsh & McLennan Companies 23 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Question 8

Do analysts prefer MRSH or AJG?

Accepted Answer

Marsh & McLennan Companies presently has a consensus target price of $201.94, suggesting a potential upside of 7.88%. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a consensus target price of $289.17, suggesting a potential upside of 14.35%. Given Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. is more favorable than Marsh & McLennan Companies. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Marsh & McLennan Companies 1 Sell rating(s) 11 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. 0 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 14 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.74

Question 9

Is MRSH or AJG a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $3.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. pays out 46.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marsh & McLennan Companies has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years.

Question 10

Which has better earnings and valuation, MRSH or AJG?

Accepted Answer

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. Marsh & McLennan Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Marsh & McLennan Companies $26.98B 3.31 $4.16B $8.18 22.88 Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. $13.94B 4.65 $1.49B $6.03 41.94

Question 11

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MRSH or AJG?

Accepted Answer

88.0% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.5% of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Question 12

Is MRSH or AJG more profitable?

Accepted Answer

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a net margin of 14.24% compared to Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s net margin of 9.96%. Marsh & McLennan Companies' return on equity of 32.67% beat Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Marsh & McLennan Companies 14.24% 32.67% 8.44% Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. 9.96% 13.28% 4.03%

Question 13

Which has more risk & volatility, MRSH or AJG?

Accepted Answer

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Question 14

Does the media favor MRSH or AJG?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, Marsh & McLennan Companies had 30 more articles in the media than Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Marsh & McLennan Companies and 7 mentions for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. Marsh & McLennan Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s score of 0.74 indicating that Marsh & McLennan Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marsh & McLennan Companies 23 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Question 15

Do analysts recommend WTW or MRSH?

Accepted Answer

Willis Towers Watson Public currently has a consensus target price of $363.50, indicating a potential upside of 9.45%. Marsh & McLennan Companies has a consensus target price of $201.94, indicating a potential upside of 7.88%. Given Willis Towers Watson Public's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Willis Towers Watson Public is more favorable than Marsh & McLennan Companies. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Willis Towers Watson Public 0 Sell rating(s) 7 Hold rating(s) 10 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 Marsh & McLennan Companies 1 Sell rating(s) 11 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Question 16

Is WTW or MRSH a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

Willis Towers Watson Public pays an annual dividend of $3.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $3.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Willis Towers Watson Public pays out 23.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Willis Towers Watson Public has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Marsh & McLennan Companies has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Marsh & McLennan Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Question 17

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, WTW or MRSH?

Accepted Answer

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Willis Towers Watson Public. Willis Towers Watson Public is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marsh & McLennan Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Willis Towers Watson Public $9.71B 3.18 $1.61B $16.26 20.43 Marsh & McLennan Companies $26.98B 3.31 $4.16B $8.18 22.88

Question 18

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of WTW or MRSH?

Accepted Answer

93.1% of Willis Towers Watson Public shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.0% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Willis Towers Watson Public shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Question 19

Is WTW or MRSH more profitable?

Accepted Answer

Willis Towers Watson Public has a net margin of 15.49% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies' net margin of 14.24%. Marsh & McLennan Companies' return on equity of 32.67% beat Willis Towers Watson Public's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Willis Towers Watson Public 15.49% 22.19% 6.00% Marsh & McLennan Companies 14.24% 32.67% 8.44%

Question 20

Which has more risk & volatility, WTW or MRSH?

Accepted Answer

Willis Towers Watson Public has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Question 21

Does the media refer more to WTW or MRSH?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, Marsh & McLennan Companies had 24 more articles in the media than Willis Towers Watson Public. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Marsh & McLennan Companies and 13 mentions for Willis Towers Watson Public. Marsh & McLennan Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Willis Towers Watson Public's score of 1.02 indicating that Marsh & McLennan Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Willis Towers Watson Public 7 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Marsh & McLennan Companies 23 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Question 22

Do analysts recommend MRSH or BRO?

Accepted Answer

Marsh & McLennan Companies currently has a consensus target price of $201.94, suggesting a potential upside of 7.88%. Brown & Brown has a consensus target price of $76.47, suggesting a potential upside of 8.26%. Given Brown & Brown's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brown & Brown is more favorable than Marsh & McLennan Companies. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Marsh & McLennan Companies 1 Sell rating(s) 11 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 Brown & Brown 2 Sell rating(s) 13 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.11

Question 23

Is MRSH or BRO a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $3.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Brown & Brown pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brown & Brown pays out 20.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marsh & McLennan Companies has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Marsh & McLennan Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Question 24

Which has higher valuation and earnings, MRSH or BRO?

Accepted Answer

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Brown & Brown. Brown & Brown is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marsh & McLennan Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Marsh & McLennan Companies $26.98B 3.31 $4.16B $8.18 22.88 Brown & Brown $5.90B 4.00 $1.05B $3.17 22.28

Question 25

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MRSH or BRO?

Accepted Answer

88.0% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Brown & Brown shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Brown & Brown shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Question 26

Is MRSH or BRO more profitable?

Accepted Answer

Brown & Brown has a net margin of 17.75% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies' net margin of 14.24%. Marsh & McLennan Companies' return on equity of 32.67% beat Brown & Brown's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Marsh & McLennan Companies 14.24% 32.67% 8.44% Brown & Brown 17.75% 13.17% 5.56%

Question 27

Which has more risk and volatility, MRSH or BRO?

Accepted Answer

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brown & Brown has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Question 28

Does the media prefer MRSH or BRO?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, Marsh & McLennan Companies had 33 more articles in the media than Brown & Brown. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Marsh & McLennan Companies and 4 mentions for Brown & Brown. Brown & Brown's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Marsh & McLennan Companies' score of 1.16 indicating that Brown & Brown is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marsh & McLennan Companies 23 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Brown & Brown 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Question 29

Do analysts rate MRSH or ERIE?

Accepted Answer

Marsh & McLennan Companies currently has a consensus price target of $201.94, indicating a potential upside of 7.88%. Given Marsh & McLennan Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Marsh & McLennan Companies is more favorable than Erie Indemnity. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Marsh & McLennan Companies 1 Sell rating(s) 11 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 Erie Indemnity 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Question 30

Is MRSH or ERIE a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $3.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Erie Indemnity pays an annual dividend of $5.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 53.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marsh & McLennan Companies has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years and Erie Indemnity has raised its dividend for 36 consecutive years. Erie Indemnity is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Question 31

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, MRSH or ERIE?

Accepted Answer

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Erie Indemnity. Marsh & McLennan Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Erie Indemnity, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Marsh & McLennan Companies $26.98B 3.31 $4.16B $8.18 22.88 Erie Indemnity $4.19B 2.86 $559.34M $11.04 23.49

Question 32

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MRSH or ERIE?

Accepted Answer

88.0% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.7% of Erie Indemnity shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 45.8% of Erie Indemnity shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Question 33

Is MRSH or ERIE more profitable?

Accepted Answer

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a net margin of 14.24% compared to Erie Indemnity's net margin of 14.01%. Marsh & McLennan Companies' return on equity of 32.67% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Marsh & McLennan Companies 14.24% 32.67% 8.44% Erie Indemnity 14.01% 21.09% 14.59%

Question 34

Which has more volatility and risk, MRSH or ERIE?

Accepted Answer

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Question 35

Does the media prefer MRSH or ERIE?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, Marsh & McLennan Companies had 33 more articles in the media than Erie Indemnity. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Marsh & McLennan Companies and 4 mentions for Erie Indemnity. Marsh & McLennan Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Erie Indemnity's score of 1.02 indicating that Marsh & McLennan Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marsh & McLennan Companies 23 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Erie Indemnity 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Metric	Marsh & McLennan Companies	Insurance Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$89.47B	$19.32B	$13.99B	$24.15B
Dividend Yield	2.11%	3.30%	5.87%	3.69%
P/E Ratio	22.92	15.58	29.26	30.42
Price / Sales	3.31	30.61	519.02	22.47
Price / Cash	16.08	12.75	30.40	20.48
Price / Book	5.99	2.10	2.84	4.90
Net Income	$4.16B	$1.80B	$1.31B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-2.07%	1.84%	0.31%	-0.16%
1 Month Performance	2.73%	2.03%	1.32%	2.26%
1 Year Performance	N/A	11.26%	12.09%	17.58%

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MRSH Marsh & McLennan Companies	N/A	$187.18 +1.6%	$201.94 +7.9%	N/A	$89.47B	$26.98B	22.92	95,000	News Coverage Positive News
AON AON	4.4473 of 5 stars	$356.12 -0.6%	$410.75 +15.3%	-5.5%	$76.00B	$17.18B	19.63	60,000
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.	4.5036 of 5 stars	$252.36 +1.7%	$288.53 +14.3%	-15.5%	$63.59B	$13.94B	41.85	72,000	Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
WTW Willis Towers Watson Public	4.7481 of 5 stars	$343.01 -0.5%	$363.50 +6.0%	-1.3%	$32.02B	$9.71B	18.88	46,900	Positive News
BRO Brown & Brown	3.9936 of 5 stars	$71.45 +0.0%	$76.47 +7.0%	-27.9%	$23.90B	$5.90B	22.54	7,905	Positive News

Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) Competitors

MRSH vs. AON, AJG, WTW, BRO, and ERIE

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies compare to AON?

Summary

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies compare to Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.?

Summary

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies compare to Willis Towers Watson Public?

Summary

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies compare to Brown & Brown?

Summary

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies compare to Erie Indemnity?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MRSH vs. The Competition

Marsh & McLennan Companies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) Competitors

MRSH vs. AON, AJG, WTW, BRO, and ERIE

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies compare to AON?

Does the media prefer AON or MRSH?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, AON or MRSH?

Is AON or MRSH more profitable?

Do analysts prefer AON or MRSH?

Which has more risk and volatility, AON or MRSH?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of AON or MRSH?

Is AON or MRSH a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies compare to Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.?

Which has more risk & volatility, MRSH or AJG?

Is MRSH or AJG more profitable?

Is MRSH or AJG a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor MRSH or AJG?

Which has better earnings and valuation, MRSH or AJG?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MRSH or AJG?

Do analysts prefer MRSH or AJG?

Summary

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies compare to Willis Towers Watson Public?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, WTW or MRSH?

Do analysts recommend WTW or MRSH?

Is WTW or MRSH more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of WTW or MRSH?

Does the media refer more to WTW or MRSH?

Which has more risk & volatility, WTW or MRSH?

Is WTW or MRSH a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies compare to Brown & Brown?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MRSH or BRO?

Is MRSH or BRO a better dividend stock?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, MRSH or BRO?

Which has more risk and volatility, MRSH or BRO?

Is MRSH or BRO more profitable?

Does the media prefer MRSH or BRO?

Do analysts recommend MRSH or BRO?

Summary

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies compare to Erie Indemnity?

Does the media prefer MRSH or ERIE?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MRSH or ERIE?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, MRSH or ERIE?

Is MRSH or ERIE more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, MRSH or ERIE?

Do analysts rate MRSH or ERIE?

Is MRSH or ERIE a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MRSH vs. The Competition

Marsh & McLennan Companies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools