NASDAQ:EHTH

eHealth Competitors

$70.15
+0.15 (+0.21 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 04:00 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$68.67
Now: $70.15
$70.45
50-Day Range
$51.03
MA: $65.45
$74.13
52-Week Range
$47.84
Now: $70.15
$137.49
Volume210,746 shs
Average Volume1.25 million shs
Market Capitalization$1.82 billion
P/E Ratio23.15
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta-0.31

Competitors

eHealth (NASDAQ:EHTH) Vs. MMC, AON, WLTW, AJG, EQH, and BRO

Should you be buying EHTH stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "insurance agents, brokers, & service" are considered alternatives and competitors to eHealth, including Marsh & McLennan Companies (MMC), AON (AON), Willis Towers Watson Public (WLTW), Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG), Equitable (EQH), and Brown & Brown (BRO).

eHealth (NASDAQ:EHTH) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MMC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for eHealth and Marsh & McLennan Companies, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
eHealth04802.67
Marsh & McLennan Companies28502.20

eHealth currently has a consensus price target of $110.7692, indicating a potential upside of 57.90%. Marsh & McLennan Companies has a consensus price target of $118.3750, indicating a potential downside of 7.11%. Given eHealth's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe eHealth is more favorable than Marsh & McLennan Companies.

Volatility & Risk

eHealth has a beta of -0.31, indicating that its stock price is 131% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

86.6% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of eHealth shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares eHealth and Marsh & McLennan Companies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
eHealth12.59%11.13%8.95%
Marsh & McLennan Companies11.91%31.20%7.96%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares eHealth and Marsh & McLennan Companies' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
eHealth$506.20 million3.59$66.89 million$3.5020.04
Marsh & McLennan Companies$16.65 billion3.89$1.74 billion$4.6627.35

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than eHealth. eHealth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marsh & McLennan Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Marsh & McLennan Companies beats eHealth on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

eHealth (NASDAQ:EHTH) and AON (NYSE:AON) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and profitability.

Volatility & Risk

eHealth has a beta of -0.31, indicating that its stock price is 131% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AON has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for eHealth and AON, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
eHealth04802.67
AON15702.46

eHealth currently has a consensus price target of $110.7692, indicating a potential upside of 57.90%. AON has a consensus price target of $225.00, indicating a potential downside of 5.90%. Given eHealth's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe eHealth is more favorable than AON.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

95.7% of AON shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of eHealth shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of AON shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares eHealth and AON's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
eHealth12.59%11.13%8.95%
AON16.56%65.00%7.41%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares eHealth and AON's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
eHealth$506.20 million3.59$66.89 million$3.5020.04
AON$11.01 billion4.91$1.53 billion$9.1726.08

AON has higher revenue and earnings than eHealth. eHealth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AON, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

AON beats eHealth on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

eHealth (NASDAQ:EHTH) and Willis Towers Watson Public (NASDAQ:WLTW) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

eHealth has a beta of -0.31, indicating that its stock price is 131% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Willis Towers Watson Public has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for eHealth and Willis Towers Watson Public, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
eHealth04802.67
Willis Towers Watson Public05212.50

eHealth presently has a consensus price target of $110.7692, indicating a potential upside of 57.90%. Willis Towers Watson Public has a consensus price target of $222.1111, indicating a potential downside of 7.61%. Given eHealth's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe eHealth is more favorable than Willis Towers Watson Public.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

90.3% of Willis Towers Watson Public shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of eHealth shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Willis Towers Watson Public shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares eHealth and Willis Towers Watson Public's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
eHealth12.59%11.13%8.95%
Willis Towers Watson Public11.00%14.32%4.02%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares eHealth and Willis Towers Watson Public's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
eHealth$506.20 million3.59$66.89 million$3.5020.04
Willis Towers Watson Public$9.04 billion3.43$1.04 billion$10.9621.93

Willis Towers Watson Public has higher revenue and earnings than eHealth. eHealth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Willis Towers Watson Public, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Willis Towers Watson Public beats eHealth on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

eHealth (NASDAQ:EHTH) and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (NYSE:AJG) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

eHealth has a beta of -0.31, indicating that its stock price is 131% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for eHealth and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
eHealth04802.67
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.16512.46

eHealth presently has a consensus price target of $110.7692, indicating a potential upside of 57.90%. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a consensus price target of $127.3571, indicating a potential downside of 6.90%. Given eHealth's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe eHealth is more favorable than Arthur J. Gallagher & Co..

Institutional and Insider Ownership

82.0% of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of eHealth shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares eHealth and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
eHealth12.59%11.13%8.95%
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.11.04%16.19%4.19%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares eHealth and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
eHealth$506.20 million3.59$66.89 million$3.5020.04
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.$7.20 billion3.71$668.80 million$3.6537.48

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has higher revenue and earnings than eHealth. eHealth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. beats eHealth on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

eHealth (NASDAQ:EHTH) and Equitable (NYSE:EQH) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

eHealth has a beta of -0.31, indicating that its stock price is 131% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Equitable has a beta of 1.65, indicating that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for eHealth and Equitable, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
eHealth04802.67
Equitable01602.86

eHealth presently has a consensus price target of $110.7692, indicating a potential upside of 57.90%. Equitable has a consensus price target of $33.00, indicating a potential downside of 2.08%. Given eHealth's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe eHealth is more favorable than Equitable.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

87.9% of Equitable shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of eHealth shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Equitable shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares eHealth and Equitable's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
eHealth12.59%11.13%8.95%
EquitableN/AN/AN/A

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares eHealth and Equitable's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
eHealth$506.20 million3.59$66.89 million$3.5020.04
Equitable$9.59 billion1.50$2.08 billion$4.856.95

Equitable has higher revenue and earnings than eHealth. Equitable is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than eHealth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

eHealth beats Equitable on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

eHealth (NASDAQ:EHTH) and Brown & Brown (NYSE:BRO) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

eHealth has a beta of -0.31, indicating that its stock price is 131% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brown & Brown has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for eHealth and Brown & Brown, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
eHealth04802.67
Brown & Brown04402.50

eHealth presently has a consensus price target of $110.7692, indicating a potential upside of 57.90%. Brown & Brown has a consensus price target of $51.25, indicating a potential upside of 3.43%. Given eHealth's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe eHealth is more favorable than Brown & Brown.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

69.1% of Brown & Brown shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of eHealth shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.1% of Brown & Brown shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares eHealth and Brown & Brown's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
eHealth12.59%11.13%8.95%
Brown & Brown18.02%13.26%5.81%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares eHealth and Brown & Brown's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
eHealth$506.20 million3.59$66.89 million$3.5020.04
Brown & Brown$2.39 billion5.87$398.51 million$1.4035.39

Brown & Brown has higher revenue and earnings than eHealth. eHealth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brown & Brown, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Brown & Brown beats eHealth on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


eHealth Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Marsh & McLennan Companies logo
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies
1.9$127.44+0.4%$64.76 billion$16.65 billion32.02Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
AON logo
AON
AON
1.9$239.12+1.1%$54.04 billion$11.01 billion30.85Dividend Increase
Analyst Report
News Coverage
Willis Towers Watson Public logo
WLTW
Willis Towers Watson Public
1.5$240.40+1.0%$31.00 billion$9.04 billion30.74Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. logo
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
1.5$136.80+1.3%$26.70 billion$7.20 billion34.29Analyst Report
Equitable logo
EQH
Equitable
2.0$33.70+0.4%$14.43 billion$9.59 billion-32.10Increase in Short Interest
Brown & Brown logo
BRO
Brown & Brown
1.9$49.55+1.2%$14.05 billion$2.39 billion30.59Analyst Report
Erie Indemnity logo
ERIE
Erie Indemnity
1.4$227.31+1.4%$10.50 billion$2.48 billion40.96Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
SelectQuote logo
SLQT
SelectQuote
1.5$31.38+0.4%$5.12 billion$531.52 million-196.13Analyst Downgrade
Increase in Short Interest
Goosehead Insurance logo
GSHD
Goosehead Insurance
1.9$107.05+1.3%$3.94 billion$77.49 million232.72Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
GoHealth logo
GOCO
GoHealth
1.5$12.24+0.7%$3.93 billionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
BRP Group logo
BRP
BRP Group
2.0$30.69+3.7%$2.94 billion$137.84 million-44.48News Coverage
CorVel logo
CRVL
CorVel
0.8$113.23+1.3%$2.02 billion$592.22 million50.32Insider Selling
News Coverage
Fanhua logo
FANH
Fanhua
1.5$13.01+1.2%$698.57 million$532.33 million-1,299.70News Coverage
HUIZ
Huize
0.4$7.41+2.0%$384.71 million$142.68 million741.74Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/18/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.