eHealth Competitors

eHealth (NASDAQ:EHTH) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MMC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for eHealth and Marsh & McLennan Companies, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

eHealth currently has a consensus price target of $110.7692, indicating a potential upside of 57.90%. Marsh & McLennan Companies has a consensus price target of $118.3750, indicating a potential downside of 7.11%. Given eHealth's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe eHealth is more favorable than Marsh & McLennan Companies.

Volatility & Risk

eHealth has a beta of -0.31, indicating that its stock price is 131% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

86.6% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of eHealth shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares eHealth and Marsh & McLennan Companies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares eHealth and Marsh & McLennan Companies' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than eHealth. eHealth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marsh & McLennan Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Marsh & McLennan Companies beats eHealth on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

eHealth (NASDAQ:EHTH) and AON (NYSE:AON) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and profitability.

Volatility & Risk

eHealth has a beta of -0.31, indicating that its stock price is 131% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AON has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for eHealth and AON, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

eHealth currently has a consensus price target of $110.7692, indicating a potential upside of 57.90%. AON has a consensus price target of $225.00, indicating a potential downside of 5.90%. Given eHealth's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe eHealth is more favorable than AON.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

95.7% of AON shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of eHealth shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of AON shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares eHealth and AON's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares eHealth and AON's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

AON has higher revenue and earnings than eHealth. eHealth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AON, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

AON beats eHealth on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

eHealth (NASDAQ:EHTH) and Willis Towers Watson Public (NASDAQ:WLTW) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

eHealth has a beta of -0.31, indicating that its stock price is 131% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Willis Towers Watson Public has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for eHealth and Willis Towers Watson Public, as provided by MarketBeat.

eHealth presently has a consensus price target of $110.7692, indicating a potential upside of 57.90%. Willis Towers Watson Public has a consensus price target of $222.1111, indicating a potential downside of 7.61%. Given eHealth's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe eHealth is more favorable than Willis Towers Watson Public.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

90.3% of Willis Towers Watson Public shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of eHealth shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Willis Towers Watson Public shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares eHealth and Willis Towers Watson Public's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares eHealth and Willis Towers Watson Public's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Willis Towers Watson Public has higher revenue and earnings than eHealth. eHealth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Willis Towers Watson Public, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Willis Towers Watson Public beats eHealth on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

eHealth (NASDAQ:EHTH) and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (NYSE:AJG) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

eHealth has a beta of -0.31, indicating that its stock price is 131% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for eHealth and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., as provided by MarketBeat.

eHealth presently has a consensus price target of $110.7692, indicating a potential upside of 57.90%. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a consensus price target of $127.3571, indicating a potential downside of 6.90%. Given eHealth's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe eHealth is more favorable than Arthur J. Gallagher & Co..

Institutional and Insider Ownership

82.0% of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of eHealth shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares eHealth and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares eHealth and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has higher revenue and earnings than eHealth. eHealth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. beats eHealth on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

eHealth (NASDAQ:EHTH) and Equitable (NYSE:EQH) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

eHealth has a beta of -0.31, indicating that its stock price is 131% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Equitable has a beta of 1.65, indicating that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for eHealth and Equitable, as provided by MarketBeat.

eHealth presently has a consensus price target of $110.7692, indicating a potential upside of 57.90%. Equitable has a consensus price target of $33.00, indicating a potential downside of 2.08%. Given eHealth's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe eHealth is more favorable than Equitable.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

87.9% of Equitable shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of eHealth shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Equitable shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares eHealth and Equitable's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares eHealth and Equitable's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Equitable has higher revenue and earnings than eHealth. Equitable is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than eHealth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

eHealth beats Equitable on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

eHealth (NASDAQ:EHTH) and Brown & Brown (NYSE:BRO) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

eHealth has a beta of -0.31, indicating that its stock price is 131% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brown & Brown has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for eHealth and Brown & Brown, as provided by MarketBeat.

eHealth presently has a consensus price target of $110.7692, indicating a potential upside of 57.90%. Brown & Brown has a consensus price target of $51.25, indicating a potential upside of 3.43%. Given eHealth's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe eHealth is more favorable than Brown & Brown.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

69.1% of Brown & Brown shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of eHealth shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.1% of Brown & Brown shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares eHealth and Brown & Brown's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares eHealth and Brown & Brown's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Brown & Brown has higher revenue and earnings than eHealth. eHealth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brown & Brown, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Brown & Brown beats eHealth on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.