Go Pro

Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) Competitors

Marsh & McLennan Companies logo
$191.32 -1.98 (-1.02%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$191.58 +0.27 (+0.14%)
As of 04:15 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

MRSH vs. AON, AJG, WTW, BRO, and RYAN

Should you buy Marsh & McLennan Companies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Marsh & McLennan Companies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Marsh & McLennan Companies include AON (AON), Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG), Willis Towers Watson Public (WTW), Brown & Brown (BRO), and Ryan Specialty (RYAN). These companies are all part of the "insurance brokers" industry.

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies compare to AON?

AON (NYSE:AON) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MRSH) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

AON currently has a consensus price target of $410.75, indicating a potential upside of 14.84%. Marsh & McLennan Companies has a consensus price target of $201.94, indicating a potential upside of 5.55%. Given AON's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe AON is more favorable than Marsh & McLennan Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
AON
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Marsh & McLennan Companies
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

AON has a net margin of 22.27% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies' net margin of 14.24%. AON's return on equity of 42.13% beat Marsh & McLennan Companies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
AON22.27% 42.13% 7.57%
Marsh & McLennan Companies 14.24%32.67%8.44%

AON pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $3.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. AON pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marsh & McLennan Companies has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Marsh & McLennan Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, AON had 16 more articles in the media than Marsh & McLennan Companies. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for AON and 10 mentions for Marsh & McLennan Companies. Marsh & McLennan Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat AON's score of 0.61 indicating that Marsh & McLennan Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
AON
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Marsh & McLennan Companies
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than AON. AON is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marsh & McLennan Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AON$17.58B4.32$3.70B$18.1419.72
Marsh & McLennan Companies$27.95B3.27$4.16B$8.1823.39

86.1% of AON shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.0% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of AON shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

AON has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

AON beats Marsh & McLennan Companies on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies compare to Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.?

Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MRSH) and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (NYSE:AJG) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $3.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. pays out 46.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marsh & McLennan Companies has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years.

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. Marsh & McLennan Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marsh & McLennan Companies$27.95B3.27$4.16B$8.1823.39
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.$15.75B4.04$1.49B$6.0341.06

Marsh & McLennan Companies presently has a consensus price target of $201.94, indicating a potential upside of 5.55%. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a consensus price target of $287.65, indicating a potential upside of 16.18%. Given Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. is more favorable than Marsh & McLennan Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Marsh & McLennan Companies
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.72

88.0% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.5% of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. had 7 more articles in the media than Marsh & McLennan Companies. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. and 10 mentions for Marsh & McLennan Companies. Marsh & McLennan Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s score of 0.93 indicating that Marsh & McLennan Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Marsh & McLennan Companies
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
9 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a net margin of 14.24% compared to Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s net margin of 9.96%. Marsh & McLennan Companies' return on equity of 32.67% beat Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marsh & McLennan Companies14.24% 32.67% 8.44%
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. 9.96%13.28%4.03%

Summary

Marsh & McLennan Companies beats Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies compare to Willis Towers Watson Public?

Willis Towers Watson Public (NASDAQ:WTW) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MRSH) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Willis Towers Watson Public pays an annual dividend of $3.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $3.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Willis Towers Watson Public pays out 23.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Willis Towers Watson Public has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Marsh & McLennan Companies has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Marsh & McLennan Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Willis Towers Watson Public had 21 more articles in the media than Marsh & McLennan Companies. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Willis Towers Watson Public and 10 mentions for Marsh & McLennan Companies. Marsh & McLennan Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Willis Towers Watson Public's score of 0.67 indicating that Marsh & McLennan Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Willis Towers Watson Public
12 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Marsh & McLennan Companies
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Willis Towers Watson Public has a net margin of 15.49% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies' net margin of 14.24%. Marsh & McLennan Companies' return on equity of 32.67% beat Willis Towers Watson Public's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Willis Towers Watson Public15.49% 22.19% 6.00%
Marsh & McLennan Companies 14.24%32.67%8.44%

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Willis Towers Watson Public. Willis Towers Watson Public is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marsh & McLennan Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Willis Towers Watson Public$10.10B3.17$1.61B$16.2621.19
Marsh & McLennan Companies$27.95B3.27$4.16B$8.1823.39

Willis Towers Watson Public has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Willis Towers Watson Public currently has a consensus target price of $363.50, indicating a potential upside of 5.49%. Marsh & McLennan Companies has a consensus target price of $201.94, indicating a potential upside of 5.55%. Given Marsh & McLennan Companies' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Marsh & McLennan Companies is more favorable than Willis Towers Watson Public.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Willis Towers Watson Public
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Marsh & McLennan Companies
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

93.1% of Willis Towers Watson Public shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.0% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Willis Towers Watson Public shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Marsh & McLennan Companies beats Willis Towers Watson Public on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies compare to Brown & Brown?

Brown & Brown (NYSE:BRO) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MRSH) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Brown & Brown pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $3.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Brown & Brown pays out 20.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marsh & McLennan Companies has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Marsh & McLennan Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

71.0% of Brown & Brown shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.0% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 13.1% of Brown & Brown shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Brown & Brown. Brown & Brown is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marsh & McLennan Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brown & Brown$6.66B3.58$1.05B$3.1722.51
Marsh & McLennan Companies$27.95B3.27$4.16B$8.1823.39

Brown & Brown currently has a consensus price target of $76.47, indicating a potential upside of 7.14%. Marsh & McLennan Companies has a consensus price target of $201.94, indicating a potential upside of 5.55%. Given Brown & Brown's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Brown & Brown is more favorable than Marsh & McLennan Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brown & Brown
2 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11
Marsh & McLennan Companies
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, Brown & Brown had 4 more articles in the media than Marsh & McLennan Companies. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Brown & Brown and 10 mentions for Marsh & McLennan Companies. Marsh & McLennan Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Brown & Brown's score of 1.18 indicating that Marsh & McLennan Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brown & Brown
9 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Marsh & McLennan Companies
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Brown & Brown has a net margin of 17.75% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies' net margin of 14.24%. Marsh & McLennan Companies' return on equity of 32.67% beat Brown & Brown's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brown & Brown17.75% 13.17% 5.56%
Marsh & McLennan Companies 14.24%32.67%8.44%

Brown & Brown has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Marsh & McLennan Companies beats Brown & Brown on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies compare to Ryan Specialty?

Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MRSH) and Ryan Specialty (NYSE:RYAN) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Ryan Specialty. Marsh & McLennan Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ryan Specialty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marsh & McLennan Companies$27.95B3.27$4.16B$8.1823.39
Ryan Specialty$3.05B3.70$63.40M$0.7259.42

88.0% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.8% of Ryan Specialty shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.0% of Ryan Specialty shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $3.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Ryan Specialty pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ryan Specialty pays out 72.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marsh & McLennan Companies has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years and Ryan Specialty has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Marsh & McLennan Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Ryan Specialty had 8 more articles in the media than Marsh & McLennan Companies. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Ryan Specialty and 10 mentions for Marsh & McLennan Companies. Marsh & McLennan Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Ryan Specialty's score of 1.02 indicating that Marsh & McLennan Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Marsh & McLennan Companies
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ryan Specialty
10 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Marsh & McLennan Companies presently has a consensus price target of $201.94, suggesting a potential upside of 5.55%. Ryan Specialty has a consensus price target of $53.42, suggesting a potential upside of 24.87%. Given Ryan Specialty's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ryan Specialty is more favorable than Marsh & McLennan Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Marsh & McLennan Companies
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Ryan Specialty
2 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.32

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ryan Specialty has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a net margin of 14.24% compared to Ryan Specialty's net margin of 7.55%. Ryan Specialty's return on equity of 43.97% beat Marsh & McLennan Companies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marsh & McLennan Companies14.24% 32.67% 8.44%
Ryan Specialty 7.55%43.97%4.78%

Summary

Marsh & McLennan Companies beats Ryan Specialty on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Marsh & McLennan Companies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MRSH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MRSH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MRSH vs. The Competition

MetricMarsh & McLennan CompaniesInsurance IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$91.30B$19.58B$14.02B$24.08B
Dividend Yield2.07%3.27%5.91%3.70%
P/E Ratio23.3915.7329.2230.37
Price / Sales3.2721.58497.6213.03
Price / Cash16.3912.7639.2533.22
Price / Book5.929.903.726.88
Net Income$4.16B$1.80B$1.31B$1.06B
7 Day Performance0.75%1.59%1.31%2.89%
1 Month Performance7.49%1.73%1.04%2.54%
1 Year PerformanceN/A13.19%13.34%20.36%

Marsh & McLennan Companies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MRSH
Marsh & McLennan Companies
N/A$191.32
-1.0%
$201.94
+5.6%
N/A$91.30B$27.95B23.3995,000
AON
AON
4.1646 of 5 stars
$357.88
-0.7%
$410.00
+14.6%
-0.9%$76.48B$17.18B19.7360,000
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
4.3923 of 5 stars
$248.03
-0.6%
$285.59
+15.1%
-12.1%$64.08B$13.94B41.1372,000
WTW
Willis Towers Watson Public
4.4096 of 5 stars
$341.63
+1.7%
$362.69
+6.2%
+4.4%$31.73B$9.71B18.4046,900
BRO
Brown & Brown
3.662 of 5 stars
$71.80
+2.0%
$79.19
+10.3%
-22.6%$23.56B$5.90B22.657,905

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:MRSH) was last updated on 8/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners