Go Pro

Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) Competitors

Marsh & McLennan Companies logo
$189.70 -3.56 (-1.84%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$189.94 +0.25 (+0.13%)
As of 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

MRSH vs. AON, AJG, WTW, BRO, and ERIE

Should you buy Marsh & McLennan Companies stock or one of its competitors? Marsh & McLennan Companies's main competitors and comparable companies include AON (AON), Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG), Willis Towers Watson Public (WTW), Brown & Brown (BRO), and Erie Indemnity (ERIE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "insurance brokers" industry.

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies compare to AON?

Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MRSH) and AON (NYSE:AON) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $3.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. AON pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AON pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marsh & McLennan Companies has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Marsh & McLennan Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Marsh & McLennan Companies currently has a consensus target price of $203.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7.28%. AON has a consensus target price of $412.63, suggesting a potential upside of 18.23%. Given AON's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe AON is more favorable than Marsh & McLennan Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Marsh & McLennan Companies
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
AON
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AON has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than AON. AON is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marsh & McLennan Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marsh & McLennan Companies$26.98B3.36$4.16B$8.1823.19
AON$17.18B4.31$3.70B$18.1419.24

AON has a net margin of 22.27% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies' net margin of 14.24%. AON's return on equity of 42.13% beat Marsh & McLennan Companies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marsh & McLennan Companies14.24% 32.67% 8.44%
AON 22.27%42.13%7.57%

In the previous week, Marsh & McLennan Companies had 38 more articles in the media than AON. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Marsh & McLennan Companies and 1 mentions for AON. Marsh & McLennan Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.59 beat AON's score of 0.34 indicating that Marsh & McLennan Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Marsh & McLennan Companies
38 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
AON
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

88.0% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.1% of AON shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of AON shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Marsh & McLennan Companies and AON tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies compare to Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.?

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (NYSE:AJG) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MRSH) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $3.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. pays out 46.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years and Marsh & McLennan Companies has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years.

85.5% of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.0% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. Marsh & McLennan Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.$13.94B4.78$1.49B$6.0343.08
Marsh & McLennan Companies$26.98B3.36$4.16B$8.1823.19

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. currently has a consensus price target of $290.28, indicating a potential upside of 11.74%. Marsh & McLennan Companies has a consensus price target of $203.50, indicating a potential upside of 7.28%. Given Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. is more favorable than Marsh & McLennan Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.74
Marsh & McLennan Companies
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, Marsh & McLennan Companies had 26 more articles in the media than Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Marsh & McLennan Companies and 13 mentions for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. Marsh & McLennan Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.59 beat Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s score of 0.80 indicating that Marsh & McLennan Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
6 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Marsh & McLennan Companies
38 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a net margin of 14.24% compared to Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s net margin of 9.96%. Marsh & McLennan Companies' return on equity of 32.67% beat Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.9.96% 13.28% 4.03%
Marsh & McLennan Companies 14.24%32.67%8.44%

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Marsh & McLennan Companies beats Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies compare to Willis Towers Watson Public?

Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MRSH) and Willis Towers Watson Public (NASDAQ:WTW) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Willis Towers Watson Public. Willis Towers Watson Public is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marsh & McLennan Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marsh & McLennan Companies$26.98B3.36$4.16B$8.1823.19
Willis Towers Watson Public$9.71B3.25$1.61B$16.2620.88

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Willis Towers Watson Public has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Marsh & McLennan Companies currently has a consensus price target of $203.50, indicating a potential upside of 7.28%. Willis Towers Watson Public has a consensus price target of $369.38, indicating a potential upside of 8.77%. Given Willis Towers Watson Public's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Willis Towers Watson Public is more favorable than Marsh & McLennan Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Marsh & McLennan Companies
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Willis Towers Watson Public
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, Marsh & McLennan Companies had 22 more articles in the media than Willis Towers Watson Public. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Marsh & McLennan Companies and 17 mentions for Willis Towers Watson Public. Marsh & McLennan Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.59 beat Willis Towers Watson Public's score of 0.81 indicating that Marsh & McLennan Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Marsh & McLennan Companies
38 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Willis Towers Watson Public
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

88.0% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.1% of Willis Towers Watson Public shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Willis Towers Watson Public shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Willis Towers Watson Public has a net margin of 15.49% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies' net margin of 14.24%. Marsh & McLennan Companies' return on equity of 32.67% beat Willis Towers Watson Public's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marsh & McLennan Companies14.24% 32.67% 8.44%
Willis Towers Watson Public 15.49%22.19%6.00%

Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $3.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Willis Towers Watson Public pays an annual dividend of $3.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Willis Towers Watson Public pays out 23.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marsh & McLennan Companies has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years and Willis Towers Watson Public has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Marsh & McLennan Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Marsh & McLennan Companies beats Willis Towers Watson Public on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies compare to Brown & Brown?

Brown & Brown (NYSE:BRO) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MRSH) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Brown & Brown has a net margin of 17.75% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies' net margin of 14.24%. Marsh & McLennan Companies' return on equity of 32.67% beat Brown & Brown's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brown & Brown17.75% 13.17% 5.56%
Marsh & McLennan Companies 14.24%32.67%8.44%

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Brown & Brown. Brown & Brown is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marsh & McLennan Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brown & Brown$5.90B4.05$1.05B$3.1722.51
Marsh & McLennan Companies$26.98B3.36$4.16B$8.1823.19

71.0% of Brown & Brown shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.0% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.1% of Brown & Brown shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Marsh & McLennan Companies had 20 more articles in the media than Brown & Brown. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Marsh & McLennan Companies and 19 mentions for Brown & Brown. Marsh & McLennan Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.59 beat Brown & Brown's score of 1.44 indicating that Marsh & McLennan Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brown & Brown
17 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Marsh & McLennan Companies
38 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Brown & Brown has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Brown & Brown pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $3.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Brown & Brown pays out 20.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marsh & McLennan Companies has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Marsh & McLennan Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Brown & Brown presently has a consensus target price of $76.80, suggesting a potential upside of 7.63%. Marsh & McLennan Companies has a consensus target price of $203.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7.28%. Given Brown & Brown's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brown & Brown is more favorable than Marsh & McLennan Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brown & Brown
1 Sell rating(s)
14 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.16
Marsh & McLennan Companies
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Marsh & McLennan Companies beats Brown & Brown on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies compare to Erie Indemnity?

Erie Indemnity (NASDAQ:ERIE) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MRSH) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Erie Indemnity pays an annual dividend of $5.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays an annual dividend of $3.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Erie Indemnity pays out 53.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Erie Indemnity has raised its dividend for 36 consecutive years and Marsh & McLennan Companies has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Erie Indemnity is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a consensus price target of $203.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7.28%. Given Marsh & McLennan Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Marsh & McLennan Companies is more favorable than Erie Indemnity.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Erie Indemnity
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Marsh & McLennan Companies
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, Marsh & McLennan Companies had 38 more articles in the media than Erie Indemnity. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Marsh & McLennan Companies and 1 mentions for Erie Indemnity. Marsh & McLennan Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.59 beat Erie Indemnity's score of 0.93 indicating that Marsh & McLennan Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Erie Indemnity Positive
Marsh & McLennan Companies Very Positive

Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Erie Indemnity. Marsh & McLennan Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Erie Indemnity, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Erie Indemnity$4.19B2.86$559.34M$11.0423.50
Marsh & McLennan Companies$26.98B3.36$4.16B$8.1823.19

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a net margin of 14.24% compared to Erie Indemnity's net margin of 14.01%. Marsh & McLennan Companies' return on equity of 32.67% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Erie Indemnity14.01% 21.09% 14.59%
Marsh & McLennan Companies 14.24%32.67%8.44%

33.7% of Erie Indemnity shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.0% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 45.8% of Erie Indemnity shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Marsh & McLennan Companies beats Erie Indemnity on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Marsh & McLennan Companies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MRSH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MRSH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MRSH vs. The Competition

MetricMarsh & McLennan CompaniesInsurance IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$90.53B$19.29B$13.97B$24.17B
Dividend Yield2.05%3.27%5.89%3.70%
P/E Ratio23.1915.9826.7030.26
Price / Sales3.3631.06518.4097.78
Price / Cash16.5612.7639.1433.34
Price / Book5.872.092.187.68
Net Income$4.16B$1.80B$1.31B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-0.30%1.34%1.53%0.43%
1 Month Performance3.49%2.29%2.60%2.10%
1 Year PerformanceN/A10.47%11.51%14.16%

Marsh & McLennan Companies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MRSH
Marsh & McLennan Companies
N/A$189.70
-1.8%
$203.50
+7.3%
N/A$90.53B$26.98B23.1995,000
AON
AON
4.5995 of 5 stars
$346.83
-2.5%
$410.75
+18.4%
-4.0%$75.48B$17.18B19.1260,000
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
4.3613 of 5 stars
$247.38
-1.5%
$289.17
+16.9%
-11.2%$64.39B$13.94B41.0272,000
WTW
Willis Towers Watson Public
4.5645 of 5 stars
$326.06
-1.7%
$363.50
+11.5%
+2.7%$30.80B$9.71B18.1646,900
BRO
Brown & Brown
4.1573 of 5 stars
$68.77
-2.5%
$76.47
+11.2%
-24.2%$23.60B$5.90B21.697,905

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:MRSH) was last updated on 8/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners