Go Pro

Putnam Managed (PMM) Competitors

Putnam Managed logo
$6.27 -0.01 (-0.16%)
As of 08/21/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

PMM vs. TYG, RHLD, FSCO, BBDC, and RPC

Should you buy Putnam Managed stock or one of its competitors? Putnam Managed's main competitors and comparable companies include Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (TYG), Resolute Holdings Management (RHLD), FS Credit Opportunities (FSCO), Barings Bdc (BBDC), and Ridgepost Capital (RPC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does Putnam Managed compare to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure?

Putnam Managed (NYSE:PMM) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (NYSE:TYG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

Putnam Managed has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure had 7 more articles in the media than Putnam Managed. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure and 0 mentions for Putnam Managed. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Putnam Managed's score of 0.00 indicating that Tortoise Energy Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Putnam Managed Neutral
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Positive

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Putnam ManagedN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Tortoise Energy InfrastructureN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Putnam Managed pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $5.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.0%.

13.5% of Putnam Managed shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.5% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Putnam Managed shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Putnam ManagedN/A N/A N/A
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure beats Putnam Managed on 6 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Putnam Managed compare to Resolute Holdings Management?

Resolute Holdings Management (NYSE:RHLD) and Putnam Managed (NYSE:PMM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Resolute Holdings Management
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Putnam Managed
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Resolute Holdings Management has a net margin of 4.21% compared to Putnam Managed's net margin of 0.00%. Resolute Holdings Management's return on equity of 3.55% beat Putnam Managed's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Resolute Holdings Management4.21% 3.55% 1.71%
Putnam Managed N/A N/A N/A

Resolute Holdings Management has a beta of -1.3, meaning that its stock price is 230% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Putnam Managed has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

13.5% of Putnam Managed shares are held by institutional investors. 52.8% of Resolute Holdings Management shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Putnam Managed shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Putnam Managed has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Resolute Holdings Management.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Resolute Holdings Management$462.05M2.15-$5.92M$5.4323.38
Putnam ManagedN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Resolute Holdings Management had 1 more articles in the media than Putnam Managed. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Resolute Holdings Management and 0 mentions for Putnam Managed. Resolute Holdings Management's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Putnam Managed'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Resolute Holdings Management Neutral
Putnam Managed Neutral

Summary

Resolute Holdings Management beats Putnam Managed on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Putnam Managed compare to FS Credit Opportunities?

FS Credit Opportunities (NYSE:FSCO) and Putnam Managed (NYSE:PMM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, FS Credit Opportunities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Putnam Managed'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
FS Credit Opportunities Neutral
Putnam Managed Neutral

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FS Credit OpportunitiesN/A N/A N/A
Putnam Managed N/A N/A N/A

36.4% of FS Credit Opportunities shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.5% of Putnam Managed shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of FS Credit Opportunities shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Putnam Managed shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FS Credit Opportunities$163.59M6.42N/AN/AN/A
Putnam ManagedN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

FS Credit Opportunities has a beta of 0.33, suggesting that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Putnam Managed has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

FS Credit Opportunities pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.5%. Putnam Managed pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%.

Summary

FS Credit Opportunities beats Putnam Managed on 4 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Putnam Managed compare to Barings Bdc?

Putnam Managed (NYSE:PMM) and Barings Bdc (NYSE:BBDC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Barings Bdc had 1 more articles in the media than Putnam Managed. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Barings Bdc and 0 mentions for Putnam Managed. Barings Bdc's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Putnam Managed's score of 0.00 indicating that Barings Bdc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Putnam Managed Neutral
Barings Bdc Positive

Barings Bdc has a consensus price target of $9.75, suggesting a potential upside of 4.39%. Given Barings Bdc's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Barings Bdc is more favorable than Putnam Managed.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Putnam Managed
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Barings Bdc
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

Putnam Managed pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Barings Bdc pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.1%. Barings Bdc pays out 125.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Barings Bdc has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Barings Bdc is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Barings Bdc has a net margin of 32.73% compared to Putnam Managed's net margin of 0.00%. Barings Bdc's return on equity of 10.07% beat Putnam Managed's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Putnam ManagedN/A N/A N/A
Barings Bdc 32.73%10.07%4.38%

Putnam Managed has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Barings Bdc has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Barings Bdc has higher revenue and earnings than Putnam Managed.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Putnam ManagedN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Barings Bdc$279.21M3.50$101.92M$0.8311.25

13.5% of Putnam Managed shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.1% of Barings Bdc shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Putnam Managed shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Barings Bdc shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Barings Bdc beats Putnam Managed on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Putnam Managed compare to Ridgepost Capital?

Putnam Managed (NYSE:PMM) and Ridgepost Capital (NYSE:RPC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Ridgepost Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Putnam Managed.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Putnam ManagedN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Ridgepost Capital$297.35M3.25$19.50M$0.2535.04

Putnam Managed has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ridgepost Capital has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Ridgepost Capital has a net margin of 9.03% compared to Putnam Managed's net margin of 0.00%. Ridgepost Capital's return on equity of 21.02% beat Putnam Managed's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Putnam ManagedN/A N/A N/A
Ridgepost Capital 9.03%21.02%9.21%

Ridgepost Capital has a consensus target price of $11.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.57%. Given Ridgepost Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ridgepost Capital is more favorable than Putnam Managed.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Putnam Managed
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ridgepost Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Putnam Managed pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Ridgepost Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Ridgepost Capital pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Ridgepost Capital had 2 more articles in the media than Putnam Managed. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ridgepost Capital and 0 mentions for Putnam Managed. Putnam Managed's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ridgepost Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Putnam Managed Neutral
Ridgepost Capital Neutral

13.5% of Putnam Managed shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.1% of Ridgepost Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Putnam Managed shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.8% of Ridgepost Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ridgepost Capital beats Putnam Managed on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Putnam Managed News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PMM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PMM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PMM vs. The Competition

MetricPutnam ManagedCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$268.99M$5.58B$13.81B$24.12B
Dividend Yield4.85%7.38%5.89%3.71%
P/E RatioN/A39.1029.6030.15
Price / SalesN/A1,258.01518.4817.63
Price / CashN/A48.2238.3132.42
Price / BookN/A2.132.186.77
Net IncomeN/A$416.48M$1.31B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-0.95%-0.25%-0.34%-0.62%
1 Month Performance-3.09%1.41%1.75%2.47%
1 Year Performance7.36%7.24%10.31%14.88%

Putnam Managed Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PMM
Putnam Managed
N/A$6.27
-0.2%
N/A+8.3%$268.99MN/AN/AN/A
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
N/A$42.79
+0.5%
N/A+4.2%$1.08BN/AN/AN/A
RHLD
Resolute Holdings Management
0.5167 of 5 stars
$132.78
+0.9%
N/A+122.2%$1.03B$462.05M24.455,620
FSCO
FS Credit Opportunities
N/A$5.05
+0.7%
N/A-30.4%$1.02B$163.59MN/AN/A
BBDC
Barings Bdc
2.9828 of 5 stars
$9.31
-0.6%
$9.75
+4.8%
-3.3%$980.06M$279.21M11.2126

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:PMM) was last updated on 8/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners