Go Pro
→ AI insiders stockpile guns, gold & gas masks (From TradeSmith) (Ad)tc pixel Free PMO Stock Alerts

Putnam Mun Oppo (PMO) Competitors

Putnam Mun Oppo logo
$10.58 +0.01 (+0.09%)
Closing price 08/14/2026 03:57 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$10.58 +0.01 (+0.05%)
As of 08/14/2026 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

PMO vs. OCSL, VRTS, ASA, TYG, and GSBD

Should you buy Putnam Mun Oppo stock or one of its competitors? Putnam Mun Oppo's main competitors and comparable companies include Oaktree Specialty Lending (OCSL), Virtus Investment Partners (VRTS), ASA Gold and Precious Metals (ASA), Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (TYG), and Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does Putnam Mun Oppo compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Putnam Mun Oppo (NYSE:PMO) and Oaktree Specialty Lending (NASDAQ:OCSL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

20.4% of Putnam Mun Oppo shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Putnam Mun Oppo shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 14.45% compared to Putnam Mun Oppo's net margin of 0.00%. Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 9.70% beat Putnam Mun Oppo's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Putnam Mun OppoN/A N/A N/A
Oaktree Specialty Lending 14.45%9.70%4.64%

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $11.83, suggesting a potential downside of 8.83%. Given Oaktree Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more favorable than Putnam Mun Oppo.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Putnam Mun Oppo
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Oaktree Specialty Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than Putnam Mun Oppo.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Putnam Mun OppoN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Oaktree Specialty Lending$316.80M3.61$33.92M$0.4827.04

Putnam Mun Oppo pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Putnam Mun Oppo has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Oaktree Specialty Lending had 2 more articles in the media than Putnam Mun Oppo. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending and 2 mentions for Putnam Mun Oppo. Putnam Mun Oppo's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's score of 0.18 indicating that Putnam Mun Oppo is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Putnam Mun Oppo
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Oaktree Specialty Lending
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Oaktree Specialty Lending beats Putnam Mun Oppo on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Putnam Mun Oppo compare to Virtus Investment Partners?

Virtus Investment Partners (NASDAQ:VRTS) and Putnam Mun Oppo (NYSE:PMO) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Virtus Investment Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Putnam Mun Oppo.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Virtus Investment Partners$819.58M1.37$121.75M$17.559.63
Putnam Mun OppoN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Virtus Investment Partners has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Putnam Mun Oppo has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Virtus Investment Partners currently has a consensus target price of $145.50, indicating a potential downside of 13.90%. Given Virtus Investment Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Virtus Investment Partners is more favorable than Putnam Mun Oppo.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Virtus Investment Partners
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
Putnam Mun Oppo
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Virtus Investment Partners had 1 more articles in the media than Putnam Mun Oppo. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Virtus Investment Partners and 2 mentions for Putnam Mun Oppo. Putnam Mun Oppo's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Virtus Investment Partners' score of 0.55 indicating that Putnam Mun Oppo is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Virtus Investment Partners
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Putnam Mun Oppo
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

80.5% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.4% of Putnam Mun Oppo shares are held by institutional investors. 6.4% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Putnam Mun Oppo shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Virtus Investment Partners has a net margin of 13.42% compared to Putnam Mun Oppo's net margin of 0.00%. Virtus Investment Partners' return on equity of 21.56% beat Putnam Mun Oppo's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Virtus Investment Partners13.42% 21.56% 5.27%
Putnam Mun Oppo N/A N/A N/A

Virtus Investment Partners pays an annual dividend of $9.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Putnam Mun Oppo pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Virtus Investment Partners pays out 54.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Virtus Investment Partners beats Putnam Mun Oppo on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Putnam Mun Oppo compare to ASA Gold and Precious Metals?

Putnam Mun Oppo (NYSE:PMO) and ASA Gold and Precious Metals (NYSE:ASA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Putnam Mun OppoN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ASA Gold and Precious MetalsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, ASA Gold and Precious Metals had 4 more articles in the media than Putnam Mun Oppo. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for ASA Gold and Precious Metals and 2 mentions for Putnam Mun Oppo. Putnam Mun Oppo's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat ASA Gold and Precious Metals' score of 0.43 indicating that Putnam Mun Oppo is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Putnam Mun Oppo
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ASA Gold and Precious Metals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

20.4% of Putnam Mun Oppo shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Putnam Mun Oppo shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of ASA Gold and Precious Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Putnam Mun Oppo pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. ASA Gold and Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%.

Putnam Mun Oppo has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASA Gold and Precious Metals has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Putnam Mun Oppo
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
ASA Gold and Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Putnam Mun OppoN/A N/A N/A
ASA Gold and Precious Metals N/A N/A N/A

Summary

ASA Gold and Precious Metals beats Putnam Mun Oppo on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Putnam Mun Oppo compare to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure?

Putnam Mun Oppo (NYSE:PMO) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (NYSE:TYG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Putnam Mun OppoN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Tortoise Energy InfrastructureN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Putnam Mun Oppo had 1 more articles in the media than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Putnam Mun Oppo and 1 mentions for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure. Putnam Mun Oppo's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's score of -1.00 indicating that Putnam Mun Oppo is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Putnam Mun Oppo Positive
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Negative

20.4% of Putnam Mun Oppo shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.5% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Putnam Mun Oppo shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Putnam Mun Oppo pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $5.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.1%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Putnam Mun OppoN/A N/A N/A
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure N/A N/A N/A

Putnam Mun Oppo has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure beats Putnam Mun Oppo on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Putnam Mun Oppo compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) and Putnam Mun Oppo (NYSE:PMO) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. Putnam Mun Oppo pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 246.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.4% of Putnam Mun Oppo shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Putnam Mun Oppo shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 17.19% compared to Putnam Mun Oppo's net margin of 0.00%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 11.04% beat Putnam Mun Oppo's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Goldman Sachs BDC17.19% 11.04% 4.62%
Putnam Mun Oppo N/A N/A N/A

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Putnam Mun Oppo.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Goldman Sachs BDC$365.57M3.03$119.27M$0.5218.95
Putnam Mun OppoN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Putnam Mun Oppo had 1 more articles in the media than Goldman Sachs BDC. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Putnam Mun Oppo and 1 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC. Putnam Mun Oppo's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of 0.44 indicating that Putnam Mun Oppo is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Goldman Sachs BDC
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Putnam Mun Oppo
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Goldman Sachs BDC currently has a consensus price target of $8.75, indicating a potential downside of 11.21%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than Putnam Mun Oppo.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Goldman Sachs BDC
3 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.57
Putnam Mun Oppo
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Putnam Mun Oppo has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC beats Putnam Mun Oppo on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Putnam Mun Oppo News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PMO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PMO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PMO vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPutnam Mun OppoCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$290.16M$5.73B$13.87B$24.33B
Dividend Yield4.69%7.38%5.87%3.68%
P/E RatioN/A38.2529.4030.85
Price / SalesN/A1,241.19512.7618.01
Price / CashN/A48.2837.2632.61
Price / BookN/A3.692.816.82
Net IncomeN/A$417.15M$1.31B$1.06B
7 Day Performance1.74%0.60%0.77%0.55%
1 Month Performance-1.63%1.18%1.43%2.70%
1 Year Performance6.65%6.64%12.06%19.14%

Putnam Mun Oppo Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PMO
Putnam Mun Oppo
N/A$10.58
+0.1%		N/A+6.7%$290.16MN/AN/A801
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending
2.1481 of 5 stars		$12.68
-1.0%		$11.83
-6.7%		-3.8%$1.12B$53.53M26.48N/A
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners
3.157 of 5 stars		$166.32
-0.2%		$145.50
-12.5%		-13.1%$1.11B$819.58M9.84770
ASA
ASA Gold and Precious Metals
1.3154 of 5 stars		$58.87
+0.9%		N/A+70.6%$1.11BN/AN/A1,100
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
N/A$42.82
+0.0%		N/A+2.4%$1.09BN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PMO) was last updated on 8/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Man who Predicted Trump 2016 Win: “Prepare for Mid-Term Meltdown”
In 2016, major election models gave Hillary Clinton a 99% chance of winning - but former CIA and Pentagon advi...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s New Currency Reset
Trump is launching a new $250 bill - but that may be a distraction. Behind the scenes, Executive Order 14241 i...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ray Dalio: Buy Gold. Get Paid.
Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, is urging investors to hold 15% of their portfolio in gold and c...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Greatest Wealth Transfer Since the Internet Boom Just Started
Wall Street forensic accountant Joel Litman - who flagged the 2008 crash months early and called the 2020 COVI...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel