Ryder System (R) Competitors

In the previous week, Ryder System had 6 more articles in the media than C.H. Robinson Worldwide. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Ryder System and 5 mentions for C.H. Robinson Worldwide. Ryder System's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat C.H. Robinson Worldwide's score of 0.98 indicating that Ryder System is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Ryder System has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Ryder System presently has a consensus price target of $294.14, suggesting a potential upside of 21.12%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $197.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.67%. Given C.H. Robinson Worldwide's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe C.H. Robinson Worldwide is more favorable than Ryder System.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has higher revenue and earnings than Ryder System. Ryder System is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ryder System pays an annual dividend of $4.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Ryder System pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays out 48.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ryder System has raised its dividend for 20 consecutive years and C.H. Robinson Worldwide has raised its dividend for 27 consecutive years. C.H. Robinson Worldwide is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

87.5% of Ryder System shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of C.H. Robinson Worldwide shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of Ryder System shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of C.H. Robinson Worldwide shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ryder System has a net margin of 3.88% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 3.73%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 38.36% beat Ryder System's return on equity.

Ryder System pays an annual dividend of $4.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. J.B. Hunt Transport Services pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Ryder System pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. J.B. Hunt Transport Services pays out 25.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ryder System has increased its dividend for 20 consecutive years and J.B. Hunt Transport Services has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years.

In the previous week, J.B. Hunt Transport Services had 6 more articles in the media than Ryder System. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for J.B. Hunt Transport Services and 11 mentions for Ryder System. J.B. Hunt Transport Services' average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat Ryder System's score of 1.44 indicating that J.B. Hunt Transport Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Ryder System has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, J.B. Hunt Transport Services has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

J.B. Hunt Transport Services has higher revenue and earnings than Ryder System. Ryder System is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than J.B. Hunt Transport Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

87.5% of Ryder System shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.9% of J.B. Hunt Transport Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of Ryder System shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of J.B. Hunt Transport Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

J.B. Hunt Transport Services has a net margin of 5.31% compared to Ryder System's net margin of 3.88%. J.B. Hunt Transport Services' return on equity of 18.75% beat Ryder System's return on equity.

Ryder System presently has a consensus price target of $294.14, indicating a potential upside of 21.12%. J.B. Hunt Transport Services has a consensus price target of $286.30, indicating a potential upside of 10.02%. Given Ryder System's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ryder System is more favorable than J.B. Hunt Transport Services.

In the previous week, Old Dominion Freight Line had 12 more articles in the media than Ryder System. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Old Dominion Freight Line and 11 mentions for Ryder System. Ryder System's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Old Dominion Freight Line's score of 1.17 indicating that Ryder System is being referred to more favorably in the media.

87.5% of Ryder System shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.8% of Old Dominion Freight Line shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of Ryder System shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of Old Dominion Freight Line shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ryder System presently has a consensus target price of $294.14, suggesting a potential upside of 21.12%. Old Dominion Freight Line has a consensus target price of $226.55, suggesting a potential upside of 20.75%. Given Ryder System's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Ryder System is more favorable than Old Dominion Freight Line.

Ryder System has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Old Dominion Freight Line has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a net margin of 19.44% compared to Ryder System's net margin of 3.88%. Old Dominion Freight Line's return on equity of 24.87% beat Ryder System's return on equity.

Old Dominion Freight Line has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ryder System. Ryder System is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Old Dominion Freight Line, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ryder System pays an annual dividend of $4.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Old Dominion Freight Line pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Ryder System pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Old Dominion Freight Line pays out 22.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ryder System has increased its dividend for 20 consecutive years and Old Dominion Freight Line has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Ryder System is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Werner Enterprises currently has a consensus price target of $41.54, suggesting a potential upside of 9.66%. Ryder System has a consensus price target of $294.14, suggesting a potential upside of 21.12%. Given Ryder System's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ryder System is more favorable than Werner Enterprises.

Werner Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Ryder System pays an annual dividend of $4.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Werner Enterprises pays out -73.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ryder System pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Werner Enterprises has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Ryder System has raised its dividend for 20 consecutive years. Ryder System is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Ryder System has a net margin of 3.88% compared to Werner Enterprises' net margin of -1.42%. Ryder System's return on equity of 18.28% beat Werner Enterprises' return on equity.

Werner Enterprises has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ryder System has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Werner Enterprises had 1 more articles in the media than Ryder System. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Werner Enterprises and 11 mentions for Ryder System. Ryder System's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Werner Enterprises' score of 1.18 indicating that Ryder System is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

89.3% of Werner Enterprises shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.5% of Ryder System shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Werner Enterprises shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of Ryder System shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ryder System has higher revenue and earnings than Werner Enterprises. Werner Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ryder System, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.