Ryder System (R) Competitors

87.5% of Ryder System shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of C.H. Robinson Worldwide shares are held by institutional investors. 4.9% of Ryder System shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of C.H. Robinson Worldwide shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ryder System currently has a consensus price target of $260.75, suggesting a potential downside of 0.28%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $195.35, suggesting a potential upside of 2.90%. Given C.H. Robinson Worldwide's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe C.H. Robinson Worldwide is more favorable than Ryder System.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has higher revenue and earnings than Ryder System. Ryder System is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ryder System pays an annual dividend of $3.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Ryder System pays out 30.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays out 51.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ryder System has increased its dividend for 20 consecutive years and C.H. Robinson Worldwide has increased its dividend for 27 consecutive years. Ryder System is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Ryder System has a net margin of 3.91% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 3.70%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 35.49% beat Ryder System's return on equity.

In the previous week, Ryder System had 2 more articles in the media than C.H. Robinson Worldwide. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Ryder System and 5 mentions for C.H. Robinson Worldwide. Ryder System's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat C.H. Robinson Worldwide's score of 0.53 indicating that Ryder System is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Ryder System has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Ryder System has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Hub Group's net margin of 0.00%. Ryder System's return on equity of 17.75% beat Hub Group's return on equity.

87.5% of Ryder System shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.8% of Hub Group shares are held by institutional investors. 4.9% of Ryder System shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.5% of Hub Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Hub Group had 29 more articles in the media than Ryder System. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for Hub Group and 7 mentions for Ryder System. Ryder System's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Hub Group's score of -0.11 indicating that Ryder System is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Ryder System currently has a consensus price target of $260.75, indicating a potential downside of 0.28%. Hub Group has a consensus price target of $43.14, indicating a potential downside of 4.00%. Given Ryder System's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Ryder System is more favorable than Hub Group.

Ryder System pays an annual dividend of $3.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Hub Group pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Ryder System pays out 30.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hub Group pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ryder System has raised its dividend for 20 consecutive years. Ryder System is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Ryder System has higher revenue and earnings than Hub Group. Ryder System is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hub Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ryder System has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hub Group has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

J.B. Hunt Transport Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ryder System. Ryder System is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than J.B. Hunt Transport Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ryder System has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, J.B. Hunt Transport Services has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Ryder System presently has a consensus target price of $260.75, indicating a potential downside of 0.28%. J.B. Hunt Transport Services has a consensus target price of $239.87, indicating a potential downside of 16.08%. Given Ryder System's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ryder System is more favorable than J.B. Hunt Transport Services.

J.B. Hunt Transport Services has a net margin of 5.13% compared to Ryder System's net margin of 3.91%. Ryder System's return on equity of 17.75% beat J.B. Hunt Transport Services' return on equity.

In the previous week, J.B. Hunt Transport Services had 6 more articles in the media than Ryder System. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for J.B. Hunt Transport Services and 7 mentions for Ryder System. Ryder System's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat J.B. Hunt Transport Services' score of 1.27 indicating that Ryder System is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Ryder System pays an annual dividend of $3.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. J.B. Hunt Transport Services pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Ryder System pays out 30.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. J.B. Hunt Transport Services pays out 27.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ryder System has increased its dividend for 20 consecutive years and J.B. Hunt Transport Services has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years.

87.5% of Ryder System shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of J.B. Hunt Transport Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of Ryder System shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of J.B. Hunt Transport Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Old Dominion Freight Line has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ryder System. Ryder System is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Old Dominion Freight Line, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a net margin of 18.46% compared to Ryder System's net margin of 3.91%. Old Dominion Freight Line's return on equity of 23.42% beat Ryder System's return on equity.

In the previous week, Old Dominion Freight Line had 2 more articles in the media than Ryder System. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Old Dominion Freight Line and 7 mentions for Ryder System. Ryder System's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Old Dominion Freight Line's score of 1.09 indicating that Ryder System is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ryder System has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Old Dominion Freight Line pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Ryder System pays an annual dividend of $3.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Old Dominion Freight Line pays out 24.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ryder System pays out 30.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Old Dominion Freight Line has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Ryder System has increased its dividend for 20 consecutive years. Ryder System is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Old Dominion Freight Line presently has a consensus price target of $218.57, suggesting a potential upside of 0.42%. Ryder System has a consensus price target of $260.75, suggesting a potential downside of 0.28%. Given Old Dominion Freight Line's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Old Dominion Freight Line is more favorable than Ryder System.

77.8% of Old Dominion Freight Line shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.5% of Ryder System shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.0% of Old Dominion Freight Line shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of Ryder System shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.