Ryder System (R) Competitors

C.H. Robinson Worldwide currently has a consensus price target of $192.27, indicating a potential upside of 15.04%. Ryder System has a consensus price target of $234.89, indicating a potential downside of 2.21%. Given C.H. Robinson Worldwide's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe C.H. Robinson Worldwide is more favorable than Ryder System.

In the previous week, C.H. Robinson Worldwide had 12 more articles in the media than Ryder System. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for C.H. Robinson Worldwide and 19 mentions for Ryder System. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Ryder System's score of 0.46 indicating that C.H. Robinson Worldwide is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Ryder System has a net margin of 3.91% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 3.70%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 35.49% beat Ryder System's return on equity.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Ryder System pays an annual dividend of $3.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays out 51.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ryder System pays out 30.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. C.H. Robinson Worldwide has increased its dividend for 27 consecutive years and Ryder System has increased its dividend for 20 consecutive years. Ryder System is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has higher revenue and earnings than Ryder System. Ryder System is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ryder System has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.

93.2% of C.H. Robinson Worldwide shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.5% of Ryder System shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of C.H. Robinson Worldwide shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of Ryder System shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hub Group pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Ryder System pays an annual dividend of $3.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Hub Group pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ryder System pays out 30.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ryder System has increased its dividend for 20 consecutive years. Ryder System is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Ryder System had 16 more articles in the media than Hub Group. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Ryder System and 3 mentions for Hub Group. Hub Group's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Ryder System's score of 0.46 indicating that Hub Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

46.8% of Hub Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.5% of Ryder System shares are held by institutional investors. 3.5% of Hub Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of Ryder System shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hub Group currently has a consensus price target of $43.20, indicating a potential upside of 3.32%. Ryder System has a consensus price target of $234.89, indicating a potential downside of 2.21%. Given Hub Group's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Hub Group is more favorable than Ryder System.

Ryder System has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Hub Group's net margin of 2.82%. Ryder System's return on equity of 17.75% beat Hub Group's return on equity.

Ryder System has higher revenue and earnings than Hub Group. Ryder System is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hub Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Hub Group has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ryder System has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.

75.0% of J.B. Hunt Transport Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.5% of Ryder System shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of J.B. Hunt Transport Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of Ryder System shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

J.B. Hunt Transport Services has a net margin of 5.13% compared to Ryder System's net margin of 3.91%. Ryder System's return on equity of 17.75% beat J.B. Hunt Transport Services' return on equity.

J.B. Hunt Transport Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ryder System. Ryder System is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than J.B. Hunt Transport Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

J.B. Hunt Transport Services currently has a consensus price target of $227.04, indicating a potential downside of 6.58%. Ryder System has a consensus price target of $234.89, indicating a potential downside of 2.21%. Given Ryder System's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ryder System is more favorable than J.B. Hunt Transport Services.

J.B. Hunt Transport Services pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Ryder System pays an annual dividend of $3.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. J.B. Hunt Transport Services pays out 27.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ryder System pays out 30.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. J.B. Hunt Transport Services has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years and Ryder System has increased its dividend for 20 consecutive years.

J.B. Hunt Transport Services has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its share price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ryder System has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, J.B. Hunt Transport Services had 2 more articles in the media than Ryder System. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for J.B. Hunt Transport Services and 19 mentions for Ryder System. J.B. Hunt Transport Services' average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Ryder System's score of 0.46 indicating that J.B. Hunt Transport Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Old Dominion Freight Line has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ryder System. Ryder System is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Old Dominion Freight Line, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Old Dominion Freight Line presently has a consensus target price of $206.46, indicating a potential upside of 5.29%. Ryder System has a consensus target price of $234.89, indicating a potential downside of 2.21%. Given Old Dominion Freight Line's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Old Dominion Freight Line is more favorable than Ryder System.

77.8% of Old Dominion Freight Line shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.5% of Ryder System shares are held by institutional investors. 10.0% of Old Dominion Freight Line shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of Ryder System shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Old Dominion Freight Line had 18 more articles in the media than Ryder System. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Old Dominion Freight Line and 19 mentions for Ryder System. Old Dominion Freight Line's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Ryder System's score of 0.46 indicating that Old Dominion Freight Line is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ryder System has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a net margin of 18.46% compared to Ryder System's net margin of 3.91%. Old Dominion Freight Line's return on equity of 23.42% beat Ryder System's return on equity.

Old Dominion Freight Line pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Ryder System pays an annual dividend of $3.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Old Dominion Freight Line pays out 24.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ryder System pays out 30.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Old Dominion Freight Line has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Ryder System has raised its dividend for 20 consecutive years. Ryder System is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.