S&P 500   3,862.68 (+0.54%)
DOW   32,046.29 (+1.75%)
QQQ   304.23 (-1.44%)
AAPL   117.43 (-3.29%)
MSFT   229.83 (-0.76%)
FB   258.80 (-2.07%)
GOOGL   2,044.88 (-2.49%)
TSLA   576.54 (-3.58%)
AMZN   3,004.60 (+0.14%)
NVDA   470.80 (-5.55%)
BABA   228.60 (-2.26%)
CGC   31.44 (+0.87%)
GE   14.23 (+4.63%)
MU   86.37 (-2.88%)
NIO   36.13 (-5.20%)
AMD   75.44 (-3.92%)
T   30.37 (+2.53%)
F   12.64 (+3.02%)
ACB   9.71 (+1.15%)
DIS   200.16 (+5.35%)
BA   226.64 (+1.53%)
NFLX   503.98 (-2.40%)
PFE   34.70 (+0.90%)
S&P 500   3,862.68 (+0.54%)
DOW   32,046.29 (+1.75%)
QQQ   304.23 (-1.44%)
AAPL   117.43 (-3.29%)
MSFT   229.83 (-0.76%)
FB   258.80 (-2.07%)
GOOGL   2,044.88 (-2.49%)
TSLA   576.54 (-3.58%)
AMZN   3,004.60 (+0.14%)
NVDA   470.80 (-5.55%)
BABA   228.60 (-2.26%)
CGC   31.44 (+0.87%)
GE   14.23 (+4.63%)
MU   86.37 (-2.88%)
NIO   36.13 (-5.20%)
AMD   75.44 (-3.92%)
T   30.37 (+2.53%)
F   12.64 (+3.02%)
ACB   9.71 (+1.15%)
DIS   200.16 (+5.35%)
BA   226.64 (+1.53%)
NFLX   503.98 (-2.40%)
PFE   34.70 (+0.90%)
S&P 500   3,862.68 (+0.54%)
DOW   32,046.29 (+1.75%)
QQQ   304.23 (-1.44%)
AAPL   117.43 (-3.29%)
MSFT   229.83 (-0.76%)
FB   258.80 (-2.07%)
GOOGL   2,044.88 (-2.49%)
TSLA   576.54 (-3.58%)
AMZN   3,004.60 (+0.14%)
NVDA   470.80 (-5.55%)
BABA   228.60 (-2.26%)
CGC   31.44 (+0.87%)
GE   14.23 (+4.63%)
MU   86.37 (-2.88%)
NIO   36.13 (-5.20%)
AMD   75.44 (-3.92%)
T   30.37 (+2.53%)
F   12.64 (+3.02%)
ACB   9.71 (+1.15%)
DIS   200.16 (+5.35%)
BA   226.64 (+1.53%)
NFLX   503.98 (-2.40%)
PFE   34.70 (+0.90%)
S&P 500   3,862.68 (+0.54%)
DOW   32,046.29 (+1.75%)
QQQ   304.23 (-1.44%)
AAPL   117.43 (-3.29%)
MSFT   229.83 (-0.76%)
FB   258.80 (-2.07%)
GOOGL   2,044.88 (-2.49%)
TSLA   576.54 (-3.58%)
AMZN   3,004.60 (+0.14%)
NVDA   470.80 (-5.55%)
BABA   228.60 (-2.26%)
CGC   31.44 (+0.87%)
GE   14.23 (+4.63%)
MU   86.37 (-2.88%)
NIO   36.13 (-5.20%)
AMD   75.44 (-3.92%)
T   30.37 (+2.53%)
F   12.64 (+3.02%)
ACB   9.71 (+1.15%)
DIS   200.16 (+5.35%)
BA   226.64 (+1.53%)
NFLX   503.98 (-2.40%)
PFE   34.70 (+0.90%)
Log in
NYSEAMERICAN:GTE

Gran Tierra Energy Competitors

$0.79
-0.01 (-1.07 %)
(As of 03/8/2021 02:07 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$0.78
Now: $0.79
$0.85
50-Day Range
$0.33
MA: $0.36
$0.41
52-Week Range
$0.18
Now: $0.79
$1.23
Volume225,188 shs
Average Volume34.22 million shs
Market Capitalization$291.31 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.25

Competitors

Gran Tierra Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:GTE) Vs. VET, TALO, QEP, GPRK, PARR, and MCF

Should you be buying GTE stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "crude petroleum & natural gas" are considered alternatives and competitors to Gran Tierra Energy, including Vermilion Energy (VET), Talos Energy (TALO), QEP Resources (QEP), GeoPark (GPRK), Par Pacific (PARR), and Contango Oil & Gas (MCF).

Vermilion Energy (NYSE:VET) and Gran Tierra Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:GTE) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Vermilion Energy and Gran Tierra Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Vermilion Energy-121.97%-11.06%-3.32%
Gran Tierra Energy-233.60%-15.72%-6.17%

Risk & Volatility

Vermilion Energy has a beta of 3, indicating that its stock price is 200% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its stock price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Vermilion Energy and Gran Tierra Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vermilion Energy$1.27 billion0.90$24.72 million$0.3321.82
Gran Tierra Energy$570.98 million0.51$38.69 millionN/AN/A

Gran Tierra Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vermilion Energy.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

13.6% of Vermilion Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.9% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Vermilion Energy and Gran Tierra Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Vermilion Energy28302.08
Gran Tierra Energy13102.00

Vermilion Energy presently has a consensus target price of $7.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 0.37%. Gran Tierra Energy has a consensus target price of $0.9125, suggesting a potential upside of 16.93%. Given Gran Tierra Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gran Tierra Energy is more favorable than Vermilion Energy.

Summary

Vermilion Energy beats Gran Tierra Energy on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Talos Energy (NYSE:TALO) and Gran Tierra Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:GTE) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

97.7% of Talos Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.9% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Talos Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Talos Energy and Gran Tierra Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Talos Energy00703.00
Gran Tierra Energy13102.00

Talos Energy presently has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 12.36%. Gran Tierra Energy has a consensus target price of $0.9125, suggesting a potential upside of 16.93%. Given Gran Tierra Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gran Tierra Energy is more favorable than Talos Energy.

Risk & Volatility

Talos Energy has a beta of 3.15, indicating that its stock price is 215% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its stock price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Talos Energy and Gran Tierra Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Talos Energy-5.36%1.20%0.50%
Gran Tierra Energy-233.60%-15.72%-6.17%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Talos Energy and Gran Tierra Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Talos Energy$927.62 million1.17$58.73 million$3.563.74
Gran Tierra Energy$570.98 million0.51$38.69 millionN/AN/A

Talos Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Gran Tierra Energy.

Summary

Talos Energy beats Gran Tierra Energy on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gran Tierra Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:GTE) and QEP Resources (NYSE:QEP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

42.9% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.6% of QEP Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of QEP Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Gran Tierra Energy and QEP Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Gran Tierra Energy13102.00
QEP Resources26202.00

Gran Tierra Energy currently has a consensus target price of $0.9125, suggesting a potential upside of 16.93%. QEP Resources has a consensus target price of $1.6750, suggesting a potential downside of 60.59%. Given Gran Tierra Energy's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Gran Tierra Energy is more favorable than QEP Resources.

Volatility & Risk

Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, QEP Resources has a beta of 5.24, indicating that its share price is 424% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Gran Tierra Energy and QEP Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Gran Tierra Energy-233.60%-15.72%-6.17%
QEP Resources2.77%1.39%0.71%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Gran Tierra Energy and QEP Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gran Tierra Energy$570.98 million0.51$38.69 millionN/AN/A
QEP Resources$1.21 billion0.85$-97,300,000.00N/AN/A

Gran Tierra Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than QEP Resources.

Summary

QEP Resources beats Gran Tierra Energy on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gran Tierra Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:GTE) and GeoPark (NYSE:GPRK) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

42.9% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.8% of GeoPark shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Gran Tierra Energy and GeoPark, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Gran Tierra Energy13102.00
GeoPark02402.67

Gran Tierra Energy currently has a consensus target price of $0.9125, suggesting a potential upside of 16.93%. GeoPark has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential downside of 11.71%. Given Gran Tierra Energy's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Gran Tierra Energy is more favorable than GeoPark.

Volatility & Risk

Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, GeoPark has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its share price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Gran Tierra Energy and GeoPark's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Gran Tierra Energy-233.60%-15.72%-6.17%
GeoPark-25.59%14.07%0.59%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Gran Tierra Energy and GeoPark's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gran Tierra Energy$570.98 million0.51$38.69 millionN/AN/A
GeoPark$628.91 million1.61$57.76 million$1.5810.78

GeoPark has higher revenue and earnings than Gran Tierra Energy.

Summary

GeoPark beats Gran Tierra Energy on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gran Tierra Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:GTE) and Par Pacific (NYSE:PARR) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

42.9% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.9% of Par Pacific shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Par Pacific shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Gran Tierra Energy and Par Pacific, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Gran Tierra Energy13102.00
Par Pacific04202.33

Gran Tierra Energy currently has a consensus target price of $0.9125, suggesting a potential upside of 16.93%. Par Pacific has a consensus target price of $14.9167, suggesting a potential downside of 19.97%. Given Gran Tierra Energy's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Gran Tierra Energy is more favorable than Par Pacific.

Volatility & Risk

Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Par Pacific has a beta of 2.51, indicating that its share price is 151% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Gran Tierra Energy and Par Pacific's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Gran Tierra Energy-233.60%-15.72%-6.17%
Par Pacific-6.35%-26.28%-5.21%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Gran Tierra Energy and Par Pacific's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gran Tierra Energy$570.98 million0.51$38.69 millionN/AN/A
Par Pacific$5.40 billion0.19$40.81 million$1.7910.41

Par Pacific has higher revenue and earnings than Gran Tierra Energy.

Summary

Par Pacific beats Gran Tierra Energy on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gran Tierra Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:GTE) and Contango Oil & Gas (NYSEAMERICAN:MCF) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Gran Tierra Energy and Contango Oil & Gas' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Gran Tierra Energy-233.60%-15.72%-6.17%
Contango Oil & Gas-230.23%-219.81%-20.05%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Gran Tierra Energy and Contango Oil & Gas, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Gran Tierra Energy13102.00
Contango Oil & Gas0000N/A

Gran Tierra Energy currently has a consensus target price of $0.9125, suggesting a potential upside of 16.93%. Given Gran Tierra Energy's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Gran Tierra Energy is more favorable than Contango Oil & Gas.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Gran Tierra Energy and Contango Oil & Gas' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gran Tierra Energy$570.98 million0.51$38.69 millionN/AN/A
Contango Oil & Gas$76.51 million10.90$-159,800,000.00N/AN/A

Gran Tierra Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Contango Oil & Gas.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

42.9% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.8% of Contango Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.9% of Contango Oil & Gas shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Contango Oil & Gas has a beta of 2.7, indicating that its share price is 170% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Gran Tierra Energy beats Contango Oil & Gas on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.


Gran Tierra Energy Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Vermilion Energy logo
VET
Vermilion Energy
1.2$7.20-2.9%$1.18 billion$1.27 billion-1.04Gap Down
Talos Energy logo
TALO
Talos Energy
1.4$13.32-1.4%$1.10 billion$927.62 million-78.35Upcoming Earnings
Unusual Options Activity
Gap Down
QEP Resources logo
QEP
QEP Resources
1.0$4.25-0.7%$1.04 billion$1.21 billion35.42Gap Down
GeoPark logo
GPRK
GeoPark
1.4$17.04-2.2%$1.04 billion$628.91 million-9.06Upcoming Earnings
Par Pacific logo
PARR
Par Pacific
1.0$18.64-0.8%$998.59 million$5.40 billion-4.11Analyst Downgrade
Contango Oil & Gas logo
MCF
Contango Oil & Gas
0.5$4.80-9.2%$910.13 million$76.51 million-2.02Unusual Options Activity
Gap Down
Brigham Minerals logo
MNRL
Brigham Minerals
1.9$15.59-2.1%$899.23 million$101.51 million-779.50
Tellurian logo
TELL
Tellurian
1.4$2.25-0.4%$873.69 million$28.77 million-2.30
Bonanza Creek Energy logo
BCEI
Bonanza Creek Energy
1.2$37.68-4.8%$823.14 million$313.22 million19.32Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
Northern Oil and Gas logo
NOG
Northern Oil and Gas
1.2$13.75-8.2%$682.26 million$472.40 million-0.61Upcoming Earnings
W&T Offshore logo
WTI
W&T Offshore
1.1$4.26-7.5%$649.34 million$534.90 million4.18Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
Kimbell Royalty Partners logo
KRP
Kimbell Royalty Partners
1.5$10.65-0.7%$640.28 million$108.22 million-1.95Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
BIREF
Birchcliff Energy
1.4$2.38-1.6%$632.69 million$462.38 million-7.21Gap Down
Genel Energy logo
GEGYY
Genel Energy
1.3$2.08-0.0%$580.38 million$377.20 million4.24
Earthstone Energy logo
ESTE
Earthstone Energy
1.5$7.38-10.8%$533.50 million$191.26 million-29.52Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
Dorchester Minerals logo
DMLP
Dorchester Minerals
1.2$14.38-3.5%$516.39 million$78.80 million18.20
Berry logo
BRY
Berry
1.1$5.60-1.6%$440.43 million$559.41 million-2.16News Coverage
Laredo Petroleum logo
LPI
Laredo Petroleum
0.9$34.29-0.1%$411.53 million$837.28 million-0.51Gap Down
Hess Midstream logo
HESM
Hess Midstream
1.9$22.52-0.6%$408.33 million$848.30 million18.31
DGRLY
Delek Group
0.6$3.25-4.6%$407.44 million$2.52 billion0.00
FLMN
Falcon Minerals
1.3$4.92-5.7%$399.48 million$68.46 million49.20Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
Gap Down
Advantage Oil & Gas logo
AAVVF
Advantage Oil & Gas
1.3$2.02-0.5%$379.99 million$207.42 million-1.63High Trading Volume
TETRA Technologies logo
TTI
TETRA Technologies
0.9$2.62-0.4%$331.32 million$1.04 billion-2.24Increase in Short Interest
Torchlight Energy Resources logo
TRCH
Torchlight Energy Resources
0.6$2.17-1.4%$305.18 million$750,000.00-10.85Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
Penn Virginia logo
PVAC
Penn Virginia
1.2$17.78-4.5%$282.42 million$471.22 million-1.57Unusual Options Activity
Gap Down
VIST
Vista Oil & Gas
0.6$2.65-4.9%$242.70 million$415.98 million-1.73Gap Down
VKIN
Viking Energy Group
0.4$0.99-4.0%$223.90 million$34.59 million-6.60Gap Down
Ring Energy logo
REI
Ring Energy
1.1$2.50-2.0%$208.26 million$195.70 million-1.91Increase in Short Interest
BATL
Battalion Oil
0.3$12.60-0.6%$205.31 millionN/A-1.16Gap Down
TGC
Tengasco
0.7$17.75-4.8%$189.66 million$4.91 million-93.42
VAALCO Energy logo
EGY
VAALCO Energy
0.6$3.25-1.5%$189.61 million$84.52 million-4.33Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
SandRidge Energy logo
SD
SandRidge Energy
0.5$4.13-1.7%$145.87 million$266.85 million-0.28
Evolution Petroleum logo
EPM
Evolution Petroleum
1.4$4.13-2.9%$142.34 million$29.60 million-31.77Gap Down
AMPY
Amplify Energy
1.0$3.66-1.4%$139.70 million$275.58 million-0.30Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
GDP
Goodrich Petroleum
1.9$10.20-1.3%$130.74 million$127.91 million-4.23Upcoming Earnings
PEDEVCO logo
PED
PEDEVCO
0.9$1.40-4.3%$116.01 million$12.97 million-10.00
Obsidian Energy logo
OBELF
Obsidian Energy
0.1$1.50-4.7%$110.28 million$315 million-0.11
TransGlobe Energy logo
TGA
TransGlobe Energy
1.0$1.52-0.0%$110.26 million$278.93 million-1.33Upcoming Earnings
PNRG
PrimeEnergy Resources
0.6$53.36-3.1%$103.15 million$104.82 million0.00Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
SilverBow Resources logo
SBOW
SilverBow Resources
1.5$8.15-1.6%$97.29 million$288.63 million-0.31Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
EPSN
Epsilon Energy
0.6$3.90-4.9%$93.05 million$26.69 million65.01
PDPYF
Painted Pony Energy
1.2$0.52-0.5%$83.32 million$228.15 million-0.21
TENG
Trans Energy
0.7$5.01-0.0%$80.81 millionN/A0.00
PHX
PHX Minerals
1.4$3.30-0.3%$73.81 million$28.97 million-2.39
PermRock Royalty Trust logo
PRT
PermRock Royalty Trust
1.3$5.06-0.8%$61.58 million$10.44 million0.00
VOC Energy Trust logo
VOC
VOC Energy Trust
1.1$3.15-4.4%$51.17 million$9.21 million5.83Upcoming Earnings
MV Oil Trust logo
MVO
MV Oil Trust
1.0$4.22-1.7%$48.53 million$12.99 million4.54Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
PVL
Permianville Royalty Trust
0.8$1.46-1.4%$47.52 million$44.96 million6.64Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
HighPoint Resources logo
HPR
HighPoint Resources
1.5$9.19-0.0%$39.56 million$452.66 million-0.03Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
OASPQ
Oasis Petroleum
0.3$0.12-0.2%$38.97 million$2.07 billion-0.01
This page was last updated on 3/8/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.