W&T Offshore (WTI) Competitors

Chord Energy has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, W&T Offshore has a beta of 0.35, indicating that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. W&T Offshore pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Chord Energy pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. W&T Offshore pays out -5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chord Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Chord Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Chord Energy has a net margin of 13.42% compared to W&T Offshore's net margin of -19.32%. Chord Energy's return on equity of 10.18% beat W&T Offshore's return on equity.

In the previous week, Chord Energy had 2 more articles in the media than W&T Offshore. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Chord Energy and 6 mentions for W&T Offshore. Chord Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat W&T Offshore's score of 0.62 indicating that Chord Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Chord Energy has higher revenue and earnings than W&T Offshore. W&T Offshore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chord Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

97.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.9% of W&T Offshore shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 35.9% of W&T Offshore shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Chord Energy presently has a consensus price target of $166.54, indicating a potential upside of 17.66%. W&T Offshore has a consensus price target of $4.25, indicating a potential upside of 17.24%. Given Chord Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Chord Energy is more favorable than W&T Offshore.

W&T Offshore has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kosmos Energy. W&T Offshore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kosmos Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

W&T Offshore pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Kosmos Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.1810 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. W&T Offshore pays out -5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kosmos Energy pays out -15.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kosmos Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, W&T Offshore had 3 more articles in the media than Kosmos Energy. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for W&T Offshore and 3 mentions for Kosmos Energy. Kosmos Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat W&T Offshore's score of 0.62 indicating that Kosmos Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

W&T Offshore has a net margin of -19.32% compared to Kosmos Energy's net margin of -33.98%. W&T Offshore's return on equity of 0.00% beat Kosmos Energy's return on equity.

W&T Offshore currently has a consensus price target of $4.25, indicating a potential upside of 17.24%. Kosmos Energy has a consensus price target of $2.53, indicating a potential downside of 4.22%. Given W&T Offshore's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe W&T Offshore is more favorable than Kosmos Energy.

42.9% of W&T Offshore shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.3% of Kosmos Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 35.9% of W&T Offshore shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Kosmos Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

W&T Offshore has a beta of 0.35, suggesting that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kosmos Energy has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 28.77% compared to W&T Offshore's net margin of -19.32%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 21.04% beat W&T Offshore's return on equity.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, W&T Offshore has a beta of 0.35, meaning that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has higher revenue and earnings than W&T Offshore. W&T Offshore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Magnolia Oil & Gas presently has a consensus price target of $31.88, indicating a potential upside of 32.23%. W&T Offshore has a consensus price target of $4.25, indicating a potential upside of 17.24%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than W&T Offshore.

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.9% of W&T Offshore shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.9% of W&T Offshore shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 2 more articles in the media than W&T Offshore. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 6 mentions for W&T Offshore. W&T Offshore's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.20 indicating that W&T Offshore is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. W&T Offshore pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. W&T Offshore pays out -5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Magnolia Oil & Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

W&T Offshore currently has a consensus target price of $4.25, suggesting a potential upside of 17.24%. Matador Resources has a consensus target price of $66.80, suggesting a potential upside of 23.10%. Given Matador Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Matador Resources is more favorable than W&T Offshore.

42.9% of W&T Offshore shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Matador Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.9% of W&T Offshore shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than W&T Offshore. W&T Offshore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matador Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

W&T Offshore has a beta of 0.35, indicating that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 3 more articles in the media than W&T Offshore. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Matador Resources and 6 mentions for W&T Offshore. W&T Offshore's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.42 indicating that W&T Offshore is being referred to more favorably in the media.

W&T Offshore pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. W&T Offshore pays out -5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matador Resources has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Matador Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 19.85% compared to W&T Offshore's net margin of -19.32%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 13.18% beat W&T Offshore's return on equity.