Senseonics Competitors

Mesa Laboratories (NASDAQ:MLAB) and Senseonics (NYSEAMERICAN:SENS) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Mesa Laboratories and Senseonics' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Mesa Laboratories has higher revenue and earnings than Senseonics. Senseonics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mesa Laboratories, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Mesa Laboratories and Senseonics, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Mesa Laboratories currently has a consensus target price of $273.50, suggesting a potential upside of 0.58%. Senseonics has a consensus target price of $0.8750, suggesting a potential downside of 74.42%. Given Mesa Laboratories' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Mesa Laboratories is more favorable than Senseonics.

Profitability

This table compares Mesa Laboratories and Senseonics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

93.5% of Mesa Laboratories shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.8% of Senseonics shares are held by institutional investors. 6.1% of Mesa Laboratories shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Senseonics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Mesa Laboratories has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its share price is 61% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Senseonics has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its share price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Mesa Laboratories beats Senseonics on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Senseonics (NYSEAMERICAN:SENS) and Hurco Companies (NASDAQ:HURC) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Senseonics and Hurco Companies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Senseonics and Hurco Companies, as reported by MarketBeat.

Senseonics presently has a consensus price target of $0.8750, suggesting a potential downside of 74.42%. Given Senseonics' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Senseonics is more favorable than Hurco Companies.

Volatility & Risk

Senseonics has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hurco Companies has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its share price is 36% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Senseonics and Hurco Companies' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Hurco Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Senseonics.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

20.8% of Senseonics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Hurco Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of Senseonics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.0% of Hurco Companies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Hurco Companies beats Senseonics on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Focus Universal (NASDAQ:FCUV) and Senseonics (NYSEAMERICAN:SENS) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Focus Universal and Senseonics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Focus Universal and Senseonics, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Senseonics has a consensus price target of $0.8750, suggesting a potential downside of 74.42%. Given Senseonics' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Senseonics is more favorable than Focus Universal.

Volatility & Risk

Focus Universal has a beta of -0.28, indicating that its stock price is 128% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Senseonics has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Focus Universal and Senseonics' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Focus Universal has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Senseonics.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

20.8% of Senseonics shares are held by institutional investors. 63.1% of Focus Universal shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Senseonics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Senseonics beats Focus Universal on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

ClearSign Technologies (NASDAQ:CLIR) and Senseonics (NYSEAMERICAN:SENS) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

8.1% of ClearSign Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.8% of Senseonics shares are held by institutional investors. 25.6% of ClearSign Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Senseonics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares ClearSign Technologies and Senseonics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for ClearSign Technologies and Senseonics, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

ClearSign Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $4.00, suggesting a potential downside of 15.43%. Senseonics has a consensus price target of $0.8750, suggesting a potential downside of 74.42%. Given ClearSign Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe ClearSign Technologies is more favorable than Senseonics.

Volatility & Risk

ClearSign Technologies has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Senseonics has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ClearSign Technologies and Senseonics' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

ClearSign Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Senseonics. ClearSign Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Senseonics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

ClearSign Technologies beats Senseonics on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sypris Solutions (NASDAQ:SYPR) and Senseonics (NYSEAMERICAN:SENS) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Sypris Solutions and Senseonics' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Sypris Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Senseonics.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Sypris Solutions and Senseonics, as provided by MarketBeat.

Senseonics has a consensus target price of $0.8750, indicating a potential downside of 74.42%. Given Senseonics' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Senseonics is more favorable than Sypris Solutions.

Risk and Volatility

Sypris Solutions has a beta of 1.62, indicating that its share price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Senseonics has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Sypris Solutions and Senseonics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

6.2% of Sypris Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.8% of Senseonics shares are held by institutional investors. 49.3% of Sypris Solutions shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Senseonics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Sypris Solutions beats Senseonics on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Senseonics (NYSEAMERICAN:SENS) and Crawford United (OTCMKTS:CRAWA) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Senseonics and Crawford United, as provided by MarketBeat.

Senseonics currently has a consensus target price of $0.8750, indicating a potential downside of 74.42%. Crawford United has a consensus target price of $24.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.55%. Given Crawford United's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Crawford United is more favorable than Senseonics.

Profitability

This table compares Senseonics and Crawford United's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Senseonics has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its share price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Crawford United has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its share price is 61% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

20.8% of Senseonics shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of Senseonics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 50.6% of Crawford United shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Senseonics and Crawford United's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Crawford United has higher revenue and earnings than Senseonics. Senseonics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crawford United, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Crawford United beats Senseonics on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.