Which has better valuation & earnings, CLS or NA?

National Bank of Canada has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. National Bank of Canada is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica C$13.79B 4.32 C$269.99M C$8.25 62.86 National Bank of Canada C$14.92B 5.28 C$4.38B C$11.30 18.08

Does the media prefer CLS or NA?

In the previous week, National Bank of Canada had 1 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for National Bank of Canada and 3 mentions for Celestica. National Bank of Canada's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Celestica's score of 0.36 indicating that National Bank of Canada is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Celestica 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral National Bank of Canada 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better valuation and earnings, CLS or MX?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Methanex. Methanex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica C$13.79B 4.32 C$269.99M C$8.25 62.86 Methanex C$3.67B 1.70 C$107.23M -C$0.73 N/A

Is CLS or MX more profitable?

Celestica has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Methanex's net margin of -1.26%. Celestica's return on equity of 47.41% beat Methanex's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Celestica 6.95% 47.41% 5.50% Methanex -1.26% -1.84% 1.99%

Does the media prefer CLS or MX?

In the previous week, Methanex had 3 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Methanex and 3 mentions for Celestica. Methanex's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Celestica's score of 0.36 indicating that Methanex is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Celestica 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Methanex 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer MAXR or CLS?

Celestica has a consensus target price of C$367.50, indicating a potential downside of 29.13%. Given Maxar Technologies' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Maxar Technologies is more favorable than Celestica. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Maxar Technologies 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Celestica 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 6 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.86

Which has higher valuation & earnings, MAXR or CLS?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Maxar Technologies. Maxar Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Maxar Technologies C$1.60B 0.00 -C$150M -C$2.75 N/A Celestica C$13.79B 4.32 C$269.99M C$8.25 62.86

Do analysts recommend CLS or MSI?

Celestica currently has a consensus price target of C$367.50, suggesting a potential downside of 29.13%. Given Morneau Shepell's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Morneau Shepell is more favorable than Celestica. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Celestica 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 6 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.86 Morneau Shepell 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CLS or MSI?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Morneau Shepell. Morneau Shepell is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica C$13.79B 4.32 C$269.99M C$8.25 62.86 Morneau Shepell C$993.25M 0.00 C$26.55M C$0.39 N/A

Do analysts prefer CLS or MNW?

Celestica currently has a consensus target price of C$367.50, indicating a potential downside of 29.13%. Given Mitel Networks' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Mitel Networks is more favorable than Celestica. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Celestica 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 6 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.86 Mitel Networks 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CLS or MNW?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Mitel Networks. Mitel Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica C$13.79B 4.32 C$269.99M C$8.25 62.86 Mitel Networks C$1.30B 0.00 -C$14.15M -C$0.12 N/A

Celestica (CLS) Competitors

C$518.57 -72.44 (-12.26%)

As of 06/5/2026 04:55 PM Eastern

Compare

CLS vs. NA, MX, MAXR, MSI, and MNW

Should you buy Celestica stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Celestica with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Celestica include National Bank of Canada (NA), Methanex (MX), Maxar Technologies (MAXR), Morneau Shepell (MSI), and Mitel Networks (MNW). These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment" industry.

How does Celestica compare to National Bank of Canada?

Celestica (TSE:CLS) and National Bank of Canada (TSE:NA) are both large-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, National Bank of Canada had 1 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for National Bank of Canada and 3 mentions for Celestica. National Bank of Canada's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Celestica's score of 0.36 indicating that National Bank of Canada is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
National Bank of Canada	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Celestica has a beta of 1.614906, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, National Bank of Canada has a beta of 1.400077, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

45.2% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.4% of National Bank of Canada shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of National Bank of Canada shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Celestica currently has a consensus price target of C$367.50, suggesting a potential downside of 29.13%. National Bank of Canada has a consensus price target of C$198.83, suggesting a potential downside of 2.70%. Given National Bank of Canada's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe National Bank of Canada is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	6 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.86
National Bank of Canada	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.27

National Bank of Canada has a net margin of 16.87% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.95%. Celestica's return on equity of 47.41% beat National Bank of Canada's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	6.95%	47.41%	5.50%
National Bank of Canada	16.87%	13.77%	0.83%

National Bank of Canada has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. National Bank of Canada is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	C$13.79B	4.32	C$269.99M	C$8.25	62.86
National Bank of Canada	C$14.92B	5.28	C$4.38B	C$11.30	18.08

Summary

National Bank of Canada beats Celestica on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Methanex?

Celestica (TSE:CLS) and Methanex (TSE:MX) are both electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

45.2% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.4% of Methanex shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Methanex shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Celestica presently has a consensus price target of C$367.50, suggesting a potential downside of 29.13%. Methanex has a consensus price target of C$50.00, suggesting a potential downside of 37.76%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Celestica is more favorable than Methanex.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	6 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.86
Methanex	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Methanex. Methanex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	C$13.79B	4.32	C$269.99M	C$8.25	62.86
Methanex	C$3.67B	1.70	C$107.23M	-C$0.73	N/A

In the previous week, Methanex had 3 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Methanex and 3 mentions for Celestica. Methanex's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Celestica's score of 0.36 indicating that Methanex is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Methanex	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Celestica has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Methanex's net margin of -1.26%. Celestica's return on equity of 47.41% beat Methanex's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	6.95%	47.41%	5.50%
Methanex	-1.26%	-1.84%	1.99%

Celestica has a beta of 1.614906, suggesting that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Methanex has a beta of 0.555104, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Celestica beats Methanex on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Maxar Technologies?

Maxar Technologies (TSE:MAXR) and Celestica (TSE:CLS) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Celestica has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Maxar Technologies' net margin of 0.00%. Celestica's return on equity of 47.41% beat Maxar Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Maxar Technologies	N/A	-10.52%	0.64%
Celestica	6.95%	47.41%	5.50%

77.3% of Maxar Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.2% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Maxar Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Celestica shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Maxar Technologies has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 1.614906, indicating that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Maxar Technologies. Maxar Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Maxar Technologies	C$1.60B	0.00	-C$150M	-C$2.75	N/A
Celestica	C$13.79B	4.32	C$269.99M	C$8.25	62.86

In the previous week, Celestica had 3 more articles in the media than Maxar Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Celestica and 0 mentions for Maxar Technologies. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat Maxar Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Maxar Technologies	Neutral
Celestica	Neutral

Celestica has a consensus target price of C$367.50, indicating a potential downside of 29.13%. Given Maxar Technologies' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Maxar Technologies is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Maxar Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	6 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.86

Summary

Celestica beats Maxar Technologies on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Morneau Shepell?

Celestica (TSE:CLS) and Morneau Shepell (TSE:MSI) are both electronic equipment companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Morneau Shepell. Morneau Shepell is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	C$13.79B	4.32	C$269.99M	C$8.25	62.86
Morneau Shepell	C$993.25M	0.00	C$26.55M	C$0.39	N/A

In the previous week, Celestica had 3 more articles in the media than Morneau Shepell. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Celestica and 0 mentions for Morneau Shepell. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat Morneau Shepell's score of 0.00 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	Neutral
Morneau Shepell	Neutral

Celestica has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Morneau Shepell's net margin of 0.00%. Celestica's return on equity of 47.41% beat Morneau Shepell's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	6.95%	47.41%	5.50%
Morneau Shepell	N/A	N/A	N/A

45.2% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Celestica currently has a consensus price target of C$367.50, suggesting a potential downside of 29.13%. Given Morneau Shepell's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Morneau Shepell is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	6 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.86
Morneau Shepell	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Celestica beats Morneau Shepell on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Mitel Networks?

Celestica (TSE:CLS) and Mitel Networks (TSE:MNW) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Mitel Networks. Mitel Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	C$13.79B	4.32	C$269.99M	C$8.25	62.86
Mitel Networks	C$1.30B	0.00	-C$14.15M	-C$0.12	N/A

Celestica currently has a consensus target price of C$367.50, indicating a potential downside of 29.13%. Given Mitel Networks' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Mitel Networks is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	6 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.86
Mitel Networks	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Celestica had 3 more articles in the media than Mitel Networks. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Celestica and 0 mentions for Mitel Networks. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat Mitel Networks' score of 0.00 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	Neutral
Mitel Networks	Neutral

45.2% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Celestica has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Mitel Networks' net margin of 0.00%. Celestica's return on equity of 47.41% beat Mitel Networks' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	6.95%	47.41%	5.50%
Mitel Networks	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Celestica beats Mitel Networks on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Celestica News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CLS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Celestica	Electronic Components Industry	Computer Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$67.95B	C$4.53B	C$38.93B	C$12.98B
Dividend Yield	0.76%	2.76%	3.14%	6.20%
P/E Ratio	62.86	11.21	171.35	36.71
Price / Sales	4.32	100.72	640.06	10.53
Price / Cash	5.22	50.37	48.59	82.29
Price / Book	28.40	5.05	9.61	4.41
Net Income	C$269.99M	C$40.73M	C$1.07B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-2.71%	6.49%	-1.00%	-2.47%
1 Month Performance	-1.15%	13.58%	4.47%	-1.45%
1 Year Performance	213.30%	103.96%	157.99%	44.27%

Celestica Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CLS Celestica	1.944 of 5 stars	C$518.57 -12.3%	C$367.50 -29.1%	+213.3%	C$67.95B	C$13.79B	62.86	23,900	Gap Down
NA National Bank of Canada	1.5032 of 5 stars	C$197.89 -1.7%	C$198.42 +0.3%	+52.7%	C$76.22B	C$14.92B	17.51	28,730	News Coverage Analyst Forecast
MX Methanex	2.5464 of 5 stars	C$84.71 +3.9%	C$50.00 -41.0%	+76.9%	C$6.55B	C$3.67B	N/A	900	News Coverage Positive News Insider Trade
MAXR Maxar Technologies	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$5.35B	C$1.60B	N/A	4,600
MSI Morneau Shepell	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$2.22B	C$993.25M	83.55	20,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CLS) was last updated on 6/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Celestica (CLS) Competitors

CLS vs. NA, MX, MAXR, MSI, and MNW

How does Celestica compare to National Bank of Canada?

Summary

How does Celestica compare to Methanex?

Summary

How does Celestica compare to Maxar Technologies?

Summary

How does Celestica compare to Morneau Shepell?

Summary

How does Celestica compare to Mitel Networks?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CLS vs. The Competition

Celestica Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Celestica (CLS) Competitors

CLS vs. NA, MX, MAXR, MSI, and MNW

How does Celestica compare to National Bank of Canada?

Does the media prefer CLS or NA?

Which has more risk & volatility, CLS or NA?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of CLS or NA?

Do analysts prefer CLS or NA?

Is CLS or NA more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CLS or NA?

Summary

How does Celestica compare to Methanex?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of CLS or MX?

Do analysts prefer CLS or MX?

Which has better valuation and earnings, CLS or MX?

Does the media prefer CLS or MX?

Is CLS or MX more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, CLS or MX?

Summary

How does Celestica compare to Maxar Technologies?

Is MAXR or CLS more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in MAXR or CLS?

Which has more volatility & risk, MAXR or CLS?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, MAXR or CLS?

Does the media refer more to MAXR or CLS?

Do analysts prefer MAXR or CLS?

Summary

How does Celestica compare to Morneau Shepell?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CLS or MSI?

Does the media refer more to CLS or MSI?

Is CLS or MSI more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CLS or MSI?

Do analysts recommend CLS or MSI?

Summary

How does Celestica compare to Mitel Networks?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CLS or MNW?

Do analysts prefer CLS or MNW?

Does the media favor CLS or MNW?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CLS or MNW?

Is CLS or MNW more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CLS vs. The Competition

Celestica Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools