Go Pro

Celestica (CLS) Competitors

Celestica logo
C$439.30 -0.40 (-0.09%)
As of 12:23 PM Eastern

CLS vs. PNG, BLN, FTG, PHO, and EXRO.TRT

Should you buy Celestica stock or one of its competitors? Celestica's main competitors and comparable companies include Kraken Robotics (PNG), Blackline Safety (BLN), Firan Technology Group (FTG), Photon Control (PHO), and Exro Technologies (EXRO.TRT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment, instruments & components" industry.

How does Celestica compare to Kraken Robotics?

Celestica (TSE:CLS) and Kraken Robotics (CVE:PNG) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

Celestica presently has a consensus target price of C$388.33, suggesting a potential downside of 11.54%. Kraken Robotics has a consensus target price of C$9.60, suggesting a potential upside of 114.29%. Given Kraken Robotics' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kraken Robotics is more favorable than Celestica.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celestica
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
6 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.75
Kraken Robotics
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Celestica has a net margin of 7.15% compared to Kraken Robotics' net margin of -6.90%. Celestica's return on equity of 50.28% beat Kraken Robotics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celestica7.15% 50.28% 5.50%
Kraken Robotics -6.90%-3.17%10.68%

In the previous week, Celestica had 8 more articles in the media than Kraken Robotics. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Celestica and 0 mentions for Kraken Robotics. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Kraken Robotics' score of 0.00 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Celestica Positive
Kraken Robotics Neutral

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Kraken Robotics. Kraken Robotics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CelesticaC$15.59B3.55C$269.99MC$9.6345.59
Kraken RoboticsC$108.72M15.31C$10.63M-C$0.02N/A

41.6% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.0% of Kraken Robotics shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.1% of Kraken Robotics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Celestica has a beta of 1.475708, indicating that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kraken Robotics has a beta of 0.836746, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Celestica beats Kraken Robotics on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Blackline Safety?

Celestica (TSE:CLS) and Blackline Safety (TSE:BLN) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Blackline Safety. Blackline Safety is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CelesticaC$15.59B3.55C$269.99MC$9.6345.59
Blackline SafetyC$160.00M4.95-C$13.93M-C$0.11N/A

Celestica currently has a consensus target price of C$388.33, indicating a potential downside of 11.54%. Blackline Safety has a consensus target price of C$9.16, indicating a potential upside of 1.19%. Given Blackline Safety's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Blackline Safety is more favorable than Celestica.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celestica
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
6 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.75
Blackline Safety
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

In the previous week, Celestica had 8 more articles in the media than Blackline Safety. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Celestica and 0 mentions for Blackline Safety. Blackline Safety's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Celestica's score of 0.56 indicating that Blackline Safety is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Celestica Positive
Blackline Safety Positive

Celestica has a net margin of 7.15% compared to Blackline Safety's net margin of -6.11%. Celestica's return on equity of 50.28% beat Blackline Safety's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celestica7.15% 50.28% 5.50%
Blackline Safety -6.11%-13.09%-8.43%

41.6% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.5% of Blackline Safety shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.1% of Blackline Safety shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Celestica has a beta of 1.475708, suggesting that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackline Safety has a beta of 0.947202, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Celestica beats Blackline Safety on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Firan Technology Group?

Celestica (TSE:CLS) and Firan Technology Group (TSE:FTG) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Firan Technology Group. Firan Technology Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CelesticaC$15.59B3.55C$269.99MC$9.6345.59
Firan Technology GroupC$199.43M2.65C$10.76MC$0.5935.63

Celestica has a beta of 1.475708, indicating that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Firan Technology Group has a beta of 1.95399, indicating that its share price is 95% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Celestica had 8 more articles in the media than Firan Technology Group. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Celestica and 0 mentions for Firan Technology Group. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Firan Technology Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Celestica Positive
Firan Technology Group Neutral

Celestica presently has a consensus target price of C$388.33, indicating a potential downside of 11.54%. Firan Technology Group has a consensus target price of C$30.00, indicating a potential upside of 42.72%. Given Firan Technology Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Firan Technology Group is more favorable than Celestica.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celestica
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
6 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.75
Firan Technology Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

41.6% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.8% of Firan Technology Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 32.6% of Firan Technology Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Firan Technology Group has a net margin of 7.46% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.15%. Celestica's return on equity of 50.28% beat Firan Technology Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celestica7.15% 50.28% 5.50%
Firan Technology Group 7.46%15.33%7.10%

Summary

Celestica beats Firan Technology Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Photon Control?

Celestica (TSE:CLS) and Photon Control (TSE:PHO) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

41.6% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Celestica has a net margin of 7.15% compared to Photon Control's net margin of 0.00%. Celestica's return on equity of 50.28% beat Photon Control's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celestica7.15% 50.28% 5.50%
Photon Control N/A N/A N/A

Celestica presently has a consensus price target of C$388.33, suggesting a potential downside of 11.54%. Given Photon Control's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Photon Control is more favorable than Celestica.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celestica
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
6 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.75
Photon Control
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Photon Control. Photon Control is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CelesticaC$15.59B3.55C$269.99MC$9.6345.59
Photon ControlC$65.31M0.00C$10.40MC$0.10N/A

In the previous week, Celestica had 8 more articles in the media than Photon Control. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Celestica and 0 mentions for Photon Control. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Photon Control's score of 0.00 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Celestica Positive
Photon Control Neutral

Summary

Celestica beats Photon Control on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Exro Technologies?

Celestica (TSE:CLS) and Exro Technologies (TSE:EXRO.TRT) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

Celestica has a net margin of 7.15% compared to Exro Technologies' net margin of 0.00%. Celestica's return on equity of 50.28% beat Exro Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celestica7.15% 50.28% 5.50%
Exro Technologies N/A N/A N/A

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Exro Technologies.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CelesticaC$15.59B3.55C$269.99MC$9.6345.59
Exro TechnologiesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Celestica had 8 more articles in the media than Exro Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Celestica and 0 mentions for Exro Technologies. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Exro Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Celestica Positive
Exro Technologies Neutral

41.6% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Celestica presently has a consensus price target of C$388.33, indicating a potential downside of 11.54%. Given Exro Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Exro Technologies is more favorable than Celestica.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celestica
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
6 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.75
Exro Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Celestica beats Exro Technologies on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Celestica News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CLS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CLS vs. The Competition

MetricCelesticaElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components IndustryTechnology SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$55.36BC$8.54BC$29.25BC$12.53B
Dividend Yield0.76%2.24%2.73%6.27%
P/E Ratio45.5925.0476.3538.99
Price / Sales3.5537.02585.669.15
Price / Cash5.2231.4646.5982.29
Price / Book20.394.567.694.57
Net IncomeC$269.99MC$203.67MC$705.00MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-3.43%-1.60%-1.75%-2.00%
1 Month Performance-5.64%-7.24%-4.64%-2.45%
1 Year Performance28.04%809.17%176.49%21.46%

Celestica Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CLS
Celestica
1.8497 of 5 stars
C$439.00
-0.2%
C$388.33
-11.5%
+31.4%C$55.36BC$15.59B45.5923,803
PNG
Kraken Robotics
2.1679 of 5 stars
C$5.13
flat
C$9.60
+87.1%
+11.2%C$1.91BC$108.72MN/A262
BLN
Blackline Safety
0.3193 of 5 stars
C$9.05
flat
C$9.27
+2.4%
+28.6%C$791.31MC$160.00MN/A496
FTG
Firan Technology Group
3.8583 of 5 stars
C$19.95
flat
C$30.00
+50.4%
+65.8%C$502.20MC$199.43M33.81450
PHO
Photon Control
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$378.34MC$65.31M36.36142

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:CLS) was last updated on 9/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners