Go Pro

Computer Modelling Group (CMG) Competitors

Computer Modelling Group logo
C$3.75 -0.15 (-3.85%)
As of 07/14/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

CMG vs. MTY, TH, MGM, CHH, and MAR

Should you buy Computer Modelling Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Computer Modelling Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Computer Modelling Group include MTY Food Group (MTY), Theratechnologies (TH), Maple Gold Mines (MGM), CENTRIC HEALTH (CHH), and Mount Logan Capital (MAR). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to MTY Food Group?

Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) and MTY Food Group (TSE:MTY) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

42.5% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.4% of MTY Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.5% of MTY Food Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

MTY Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Computer Modelling Group. MTY Food Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Computer Modelling GroupC$126.19M2.32C$23.95MC$0.2117.86
MTY Food GroupC$1.17B0.64C$93.69MC$6.734.85

Computer Modelling Group currently has a consensus target price of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 53.33%. MTY Food Group has a consensus target price of C$42.50, indicating a potential upside of 30.13%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than MTY Food Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
MTY Food Group
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.795431, indicating that its share price is 180% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MTY Food Group has a beta of 0.998584, indicating that its share price is 0% less volatile than the broader market.

Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. MTY Food Group pays an annual dividend of C$1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Computer Modelling Group pays out 38.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MTY Food Group pays out 20.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MTY Food Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, MTY Food Group had 21 more articles in the media than Computer Modelling Group. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for MTY Food Group and 1 mentions for Computer Modelling Group. Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat MTY Food Group's score of -0.36 indicating that Computer Modelling Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Computer Modelling Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
MTY Food Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.80% compared to MTY Food Group's net margin of 9.78%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 20.50% beat MTY Food Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Computer Modelling Group13.80% 20.50% 12.79%
MTY Food Group 9.78%13.22%4.18%

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats MTY Food Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Theratechnologies?

Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) and Theratechnologies (TSE:TH) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

In the previous week, Computer Modelling Group and Computer Modelling Group both had 1 articles in the media. Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Theratechnologies' score of 0.67 indicating that Computer Modelling Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Computer Modelling Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Theratechnologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Computer Modelling Group has higher revenue and earnings than Theratechnologies. Theratechnologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Computer Modelling GroupC$126.19M2.32C$23.95MC$0.2117.86
TheratechnologiesC$84.38M2.44-C$1.96M-C$0.19N/A

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.80% compared to Theratechnologies' net margin of -11.81%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 20.50% beat Theratechnologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Computer Modelling Group13.80% 20.50% 12.79%
Theratechnologies -11.81%16.59%5.15%

Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.795431, meaning that its share price is 180% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Theratechnologies has a beta of 0.256166, meaning that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

Computer Modelling Group presently has a consensus price target of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 53.33%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Theratechnologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Theratechnologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

42.5% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Theratechnologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Theratechnologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats Theratechnologies on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Maple Gold Mines?

Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) and Maple Gold Mines (CVE:MGM) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Computer Modelling Group presently has a consensus price target of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 53.33%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Maple Gold Mines.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Maple Gold Mines
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.795431, meaning that its stock price is 180% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Maple Gold Mines has a beta of 2.2399, meaning that its stock price is 124% more volatile than the broader market.

Computer Modelling Group has higher revenue and earnings than Maple Gold Mines. Maple Gold Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Computer Modelling GroupC$126.19M2.32C$23.95MC$0.2117.86
Maple Gold MinesN/AN/A-C$4.83M-C$0.23N/A

42.5% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.3% of Maple Gold Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 21.1% of Maple Gold Mines shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Computer Modelling Group had 1 more articles in the media than Maple Gold Mines. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Computer Modelling Group and 0 mentions for Maple Gold Mines. Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Maple Gold Mines' score of 0.00 indicating that Computer Modelling Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Computer Modelling Group Positive
Maple Gold Mines Neutral

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.80% compared to Maple Gold Mines' net margin of 0.00%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 20.50% beat Maple Gold Mines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Computer Modelling Group13.80% 20.50% 12.79%
Maple Gold Mines N/A -105.68%-45.61%

Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Maple Gold Mines pays an annual dividend of C$0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.2%. Computer Modelling Group pays out 38.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Maple Gold Mines pays out -208.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Maple Gold Mines is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats Maple Gold Mines on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to CENTRIC HEALTH?

Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) and CENTRIC HEALTH (TSE:CHH) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Computer Modelling Group had 1 more articles in the media than CENTRIC HEALTH. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Computer Modelling Group and 0 mentions for CENTRIC HEALTH. Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat CENTRIC HEALTH's score of 0.00 indicating that Computer Modelling Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Computer Modelling Group Positive
CENTRIC HEALTH Neutral

Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. CENTRIC HEALTH pays an annual dividend of C$0.86 per share. Computer Modelling Group pays out 38.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CENTRIC HEALTH pays out -1,075.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.80% compared to CENTRIC HEALTH's net margin of 0.00%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 20.50% beat CENTRIC HEALTH's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Computer Modelling Group13.80% 20.50% 12.79%
CENTRIC HEALTH N/A N/A N/A

42.5% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Computer Modelling Group currently has a consensus price target of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 53.33%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than CENTRIC HEALTH.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
CENTRIC HEALTH
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Computer Modelling Group has higher revenue and earnings than CENTRIC HEALTH. CENTRIC HEALTH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Computer Modelling GroupC$126.19M2.32C$23.95MC$0.2117.86
CENTRIC HEALTHC$125.52M0.00-C$1.66M-C$0.08N/A

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats CENTRIC HEALTH on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Mount Logan Capital?

Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) and Mount Logan Capital (TSE:MAR) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.80% compared to Mount Logan Capital's net margin of 0.00%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 20.50% beat Mount Logan Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Computer Modelling Group13.80% 20.50% 12.79%
Mount Logan Capital N/A N/A N/A

Computer Modelling Group currently has a consensus price target of C$5.75, suggesting a potential upside of 53.33%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Mount Logan Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Mount Logan Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

42.5% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Computer Modelling Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mount Logan Capital. Mount Logan Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Computer Modelling GroupC$126.19M2.32C$23.95MC$0.2117.86
Mount Logan CapitalC$394K0.00-C$442.58K-C$0.03N/A

In the previous week, Computer Modelling Group had 1 more articles in the media than Mount Logan Capital. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Computer Modelling Group and 0 mentions for Mount Logan Capital. Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Mount Logan Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that Computer Modelling Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Computer Modelling Group Positive
Mount Logan Capital Neutral

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats Mount Logan Capital on 14 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Computer Modelling Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMG vs. The Competition

MetricComputer Modelling GroupSoftware IndustryComputer SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$292.48MC$4.95BC$38.47BC$12.29B
Dividend Yield1.02%4.05%3.19%6.17%
P/E Ratio17.8626.94170.3036.35
Price / Sales2.32240.41597.409.83
Price / Cash8.4017.5245.8782.29
Price / Book3.754.279.534.49
Net IncomeC$23.95MC$22.26MC$1.07BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-0.79%0.23%0.29%0.37%
1 Month Performance-3.85%-0.82%-1.90%-1.30%
1 Year Performance-48.70%-12.71%141.75%32.60%

Computer Modelling Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMG
Computer Modelling Group
4.4692 of 5 stars
C$3.75
-3.8%
C$5.75
+53.3%
-48.6%C$292.48MC$126.19M17.86105,000
MTY
MTY Food Group
4.718 of 5 stars
C$38.41
+2.7%
C$46.00
+19.8%
-19.6%C$877.32MC$1.17B5.717,326
TH
Theratechnologies
N/AC$4.47
-4.9%
N/A+3.7%C$205.53MC$84.38MN/A103
MGM
Maple Gold Mines
N/AC$2.68
+0.4%
N/A+210.6%C$192.51MN/AN/A46,000
CHH
CENTRIC HEALTH
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$95.70MC$125.52MN/A1,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:CMG) was last updated on 7/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners