Free Trial

Computer Modelling Group (CMG) Competitors

Computer Modelling Group logo
C$4.15 +0.14 (+3.49%)
As of 11/11/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

CMG vs. DCBO, HIVE, ENGH, ABST, and KSI

Should you buy Computer Modelling Group stock or one of its competitors? Computer Modelling Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Docebo (DCBO), HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE), Enghouse Systems (ENGH), Absolute Software (ABST), and kneat.com (KSI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "application software" industry.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Docebo?

Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) and Docebo (TSE:DCBO) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Docebo had 7 more articles in the media than Computer Modelling Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Docebo and 0 mentions for Computer Modelling Group. Docebo's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Computer Modelling Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Docebo is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Computer Modelling Group Neutral
Docebo Positive

Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.585767, meaning that its stock price is 159% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Docebo has a beta of 0.374426, meaning that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Docebo has a net margin of 13.23% compared to Computer Modelling Group's net margin of 12.41%. Docebo's return on equity of 114.70% beat Computer Modelling Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Computer Modelling Group12.41% 18.44% 12.79%
Docebo 13.23%114.70%3.68%

Computer Modelling Group currently has a consensus target price of C$5.75, suggesting a potential upside of 38.55%. Docebo has a consensus target price of C$36.00, suggesting a potential downside of 23.31%. Given Computer Modelling Group's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Docebo.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Docebo
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Computer Modelling Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Docebo. Computer Modelling Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Docebo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Computer Modelling GroupC$124.40M2.46C$23.95MC$0.1921.84
DoceboC$267.64M4.38C$12.71MC$1.3135.83

37.6% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.5% of Docebo shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.2% of Docebo shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Docebo beats Computer Modelling Group on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) and HIVE Digital Technologies (CVE:HIVE) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.585767, meaning that its stock price is 159% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HIVE Digital Technologies has a beta of 2.339164, meaning that its stock price is 134% more volatile than the broader market.

Computer Modelling Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than HIVE Digital Technologies. HIVE Digital Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Computer Modelling GroupC$124.40M2.46C$23.95MC$0.1921.84
HIVE Digital TechnologiesC$257.14M4.04-C$13.38M-C$0.77N/A

In the previous week, HIVE Digital Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Computer Modelling Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for HIVE Digital Technologies and 0 mentions for Computer Modelling Group. HIVE Digital Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Computer Modelling Group's score of 0.00 indicating that HIVE Digital Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Computer Modelling Group Neutral
HIVE Digital Technologies Neutral

Computer Modelling Group currently has a consensus target price of C$5.75, suggesting a potential upside of 38.55%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than HIVE Digital Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
HIVE Digital Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

37.6% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.2% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 12.41% compared to HIVE Digital Technologies' net margin of -50.08%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 18.44% beat HIVE Digital Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Computer Modelling Group12.41% 18.44% 12.79%
HIVE Digital Technologies -50.08%-26.37%-8.78%

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats HIVE Digital Technologies on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Enghouse Systems?

Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) and Enghouse Systems (TSE:ENGH) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Enghouse Systems pays an annual dividend of C$1.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Computer Modelling Group pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enghouse Systems pays out 93.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Enghouse Systems had 2 more articles in the media than Computer Modelling Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Enghouse Systems and 0 mentions for Computer Modelling Group. Enghouse Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Computer Modelling Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Enghouse Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Computer Modelling Group Neutral
Enghouse Systems Positive

Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.585767, indicating that its stock price is 159% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enghouse Systems has a beta of 0.417904, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

37.6% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.3% of Enghouse Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Enghouse Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Enghouse Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Computer Modelling Group. Enghouse Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Computer Modelling GroupC$124.40M2.46C$23.95MC$0.1921.84
Enghouse SystemsC$476.43M2.07C$81.66MC$1.2914.17

Enghouse Systems has a net margin of 14.75% compared to Computer Modelling Group's net margin of 12.41%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 18.44% beat Enghouse Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Computer Modelling Group12.41% 18.44% 12.79%
Enghouse Systems 14.75%11.70%7.51%

Computer Modelling Group currently has a consensus target price of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 38.55%. Enghouse Systems has a consensus target price of C$17.80, indicating a potential downside of 2.63%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Enghouse Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Enghouse Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Computer Modelling Group and Enghouse Systems tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Absolute Software?

Absolute Software (TSE:ABST) and Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Computer Modelling Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Absolute Software. Absolute Software is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Absolute SoftwareC$222.06M0.00-C$25.79M-C$0.66N/A
Computer Modelling GroupC$124.40M2.46C$23.95MC$0.1921.84

Computer Modelling Group has a consensus target price of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 38.55%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Absolute Software.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Absolute Software
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, Absolute Software's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Computer Modelling Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Absolute Software Neutral
Computer Modelling Group Neutral

Absolute Software pays an annual dividend of C$0.32 per share. Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Absolute Software pays out -48.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Computer Modelling Group pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

82.0% of Absolute Software shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Absolute Software shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Absolute Software has a beta of 0.36, suggesting that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.585767, suggesting that its share price is 159% less volatile than the broader market.

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 12.41% compared to Absolute Software's net margin of -11.61%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 18.44% beat Absolute Software's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Absolute Software-11.61% -966.77% 0.49%
Computer Modelling Group 12.41%18.44%12.79%

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats Absolute Software on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to kneat.com?

kneat.com (TSE:KSI) and Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, kneat.com's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Computer Modelling Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
kneat.com Neutral
Computer Modelling Group Neutral

6.5% of kneat.com shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.0% of kneat.com shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

kneat.com presently has a consensus target price of C$6.30, indicating a potential downside of 3.08%. Computer Modelling Group has a consensus target price of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 38.55%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than kneat.com.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
kneat.com
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 12.41% compared to kneat.com's net margin of -12.69%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 18.44% beat kneat.com's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
kneat.com-12.69% -12.95% -9.84%
Computer Modelling Group 12.41%18.44%12.79%

kneat.com has a beta of 1.109589, suggesting that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.585767, suggesting that its share price is 159% less volatile than the broader market.

Computer Modelling Group has higher revenue and earnings than kneat.com. kneat.com is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
kneat.comC$66.52M9.44-C$8.62M-C$0.08N/A
Computer Modelling GroupC$124.40M2.46C$23.95MC$0.1921.84

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats kneat.com on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Computer Modelling Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMG vs. The Competition

MetricComputer Modelling GroupSoftware IndustryTechnology SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$295.14MC$15.93BC$26.87BC$13.18B
Dividend Yield1.00%3.39%2.90%4.73%
P/E Ratio21.8447.2043.3129.95
Price / Sales2.466.035.563.96
Price / Cash8.4027.7427.0234.92
Price / Book4.076.225.403.57
Net IncomeC$23.95MC$428.74MC$790.32MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance7.24%2.44%5.37%1.72%
1 Month Performance-3.04%-2.38%-6.16%-1.79%
1 Year Performance-18.47%-10.70%2.56%12.92%

Computer Modelling Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMG
Computer Modelling Group
2.731 of 5 stars
C$4.15
+3.5%
C$5.69
+37.0%
-18.6%C$295.14MC$124.40M21.84105,000
DCBO
Docebo
0.9527 of 5 stars
C$42.22
+1.8%
C$36.00
-14.7%
+42.2%C$1.05BC$258.93M36.71966
HIVE
HIVE Digital Technologies
N/AC$4.10
flat
N/A-36.8%C$1.04BC$257.14MN/A20
ENGH
Enghouse Systems
1.231 of 5 stars
C$18.01
-0.8%
C$17.80
-1.2%
-12.7%C$970.76MC$476.43M13.961,933
ABST
Absolute Software
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$807.42MC$222.06MN/A740

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:CMG) was last updated on 11/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners