Free Trial

Medical Facilities (DR) Competitors

Medical Facilities logo
C$18.15 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06/12/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

DR vs. NLH, KDA, PHA, EXE, and SIA

Should you buy Medical Facilities stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Medical Facilities with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Medical Facilities include Nova Leap Health (NLH), KDA Group (KDA), Premier Health of America (PHA), Extendicare (EXE), and Sienna Senior Living (SIA). These companies are all part of the "medical care facilities" industry.

How does Medical Facilities compare to Nova Leap Health?

Nova Leap Health (CVE:NLH) and Medical Facilities (TSE:DR) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and media sentiment.

Medical Facilities has higher revenue and earnings than Nova Leap Health. Medical Facilities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nova Leap Health, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nova Leap HealthC$32.23M1.00-C$300.30KC$0.00123.33
Medical FacilitiesC$260.72M1.22C$17.17MC$1.949.36

Medical Facilities has a net margin of 8.51% compared to Nova Leap Health's net margin of 0.64%. Medical Facilities' return on equity of 31.06% beat Nova Leap Health's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nova Leap Health0.64% 1.10% 2.77%
Medical Facilities 8.51%31.06%13.60%

Nova Leap Health has a beta of 1.961788, suggesting that its share price is 96% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Medical Facilities has a beta of 0.502064, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Nova Leap Health had 4 more articles in the media than Medical Facilities. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Nova Leap Health and 0 mentions for Medical Facilities. Nova Leap Health's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Medical Facilities' score of 0.00 indicating that Nova Leap Health is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nova Leap Health Positive
Medical Facilities Neutral

0.0% of Nova Leap Health shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.7% of Medical Facilities shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.8% of Nova Leap Health shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Medical Facilities shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Medical Facilities beats Nova Leap Health on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Medical Facilities compare to KDA Group?

Medical Facilities (TSE:DR) and KDA Group (CVE:KDA) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

KDA Group has a net margin of 5,414.15% compared to Medical Facilities' net margin of 8.51%. Medical Facilities' return on equity of 31.06% beat KDA Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Medical Facilities8.51% 31.06% 13.60%
KDA Group 5,414.15%-15.93%-11.56%

Medical Facilities has a beta of 0.502064, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KDA Group has a beta of -0.394297, indicating that its share price is 139% less volatile than the broader market.

15.7% of Medical Facilities shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Medical Facilities shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.5% of KDA Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Medical Facilities has higher revenue and earnings than KDA Group. KDA Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Medical Facilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Medical FacilitiesC$260.72M1.22C$17.17MC$1.949.36
KDA GroupC$317.01K50.48-C$1.73M-C$0.04N/A

In the previous week, Medical Facilities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled KDA Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Medical Facilities Neutral
KDA Group Neutral

Summary

Medical Facilities beats KDA Group on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Medical Facilities compare to Premier Health of America?

Premier Health of America (CVE:PHA) and Medical Facilities (TSE:DR) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, Premier Health of America's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Medical Facilities'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Premier Health of America Neutral
Medical Facilities Neutral

Premier Health of America has a beta of -0.041415, indicating that its stock price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Medical Facilities has a beta of 0.502064, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Medical Facilities has a net margin of 8.51% compared to Premier Health of America's net margin of -17.94%. Premier Health of America's return on equity of 202.02% beat Medical Facilities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premier Health of America-17.94% 202.02% 0.89%
Medical Facilities 8.51%31.06%13.60%

Medical Facilities has higher revenue and earnings than Premier Health of America. Premier Health of America is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Medical Facilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premier Health of AmericaC$87.67M0.01-C$12.50M-C$0.28N/A
Medical FacilitiesC$260.72M1.22C$17.17MC$1.949.36

15.7% of Medical Facilities shares are held by institutional investors. 52.1% of Premier Health of America shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Medical Facilities shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Medical Facilities beats Premier Health of America on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Medical Facilities compare to Extendicare?

Medical Facilities (TSE:DR) and Extendicare (TSE:EXE) are both medical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Medical Facilities has a beta of 0.502064, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Extendicare has a beta of 1.57403, meaning that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Medical Facilities has a net margin of 8.51% compared to Extendicare's net margin of 6.99%. Extendicare's return on equity of 45.35% beat Medical Facilities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Medical Facilities8.51% 31.06% 13.60%
Extendicare 6.99%45.35%7.16%

In the previous week, Extendicare had 1 more articles in the media than Medical Facilities. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Extendicare and 0 mentions for Medical Facilities. Medical Facilities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Extendicare'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Medical Facilities Neutral
Extendicare Neutral

Medical Facilities pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Extendicare pays an annual dividend of C$0.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Medical Facilities pays out 13.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Extendicare pays out 37.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Extendicare has a consensus target price of C$32.56, suggesting a potential downside of 0.38%. Given Extendicare's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Extendicare is more favorable than Medical Facilities.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Medical Facilities
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Extendicare
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

Extendicare has higher revenue and earnings than Medical Facilities. Medical Facilities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Extendicare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Medical FacilitiesC$260.72M1.22C$17.17MC$1.949.36
ExtendicareC$1.75B1.77C$65.46MC$1.3624.05

15.7% of Medical Facilities shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.2% of Extendicare shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Medical Facilities shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.9% of Extendicare shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Extendicare beats Medical Facilities on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Medical Facilities compare to Sienna Senior Living?

Medical Facilities (TSE:DR) and Sienna Senior Living (TSE:SIA) are both medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Sienna Senior Living has a consensus price target of C$26.09, indicating a potential upside of 21.52%. Given Sienna Senior Living's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sienna Senior Living is more favorable than Medical Facilities.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Medical Facilities
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Sienna Senior Living
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Medical Facilities has a beta of 0.502064, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sienna Senior Living has a beta of 1.098577, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

15.7% of Medical Facilities shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.3% of Sienna Senior Living shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Medical Facilities shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Sienna Senior Living shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Sienna Senior Living had 1 more articles in the media than Medical Facilities. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Sienna Senior Living and 0 mentions for Medical Facilities. Medical Facilities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sienna Senior Living'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Medical Facilities Neutral
Sienna Senior Living Neutral

Sienna Senior Living has higher revenue and earnings than Medical Facilities. Medical Facilities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sienna Senior Living, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Medical FacilitiesC$260.72M1.22C$17.17MC$1.949.36
Sienna Senior LivingC$1.05B2.18C$33.51MC$0.4844.73

Medical Facilities has a net margin of 8.51% compared to Sienna Senior Living's net margin of 4.34%. Medical Facilities' return on equity of 31.06% beat Sienna Senior Living's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Medical Facilities8.51% 31.06% 13.60%
Sienna Senior Living 4.34%6.44%3.58%

Medical Facilities pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Sienna Senior Living pays an annual dividend of C$0.94 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Medical Facilities pays out 13.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sienna Senior Living pays out 195.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Sienna Senior Living beats Medical Facilities on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Medical Facilities News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for DR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

DR vs. The Competition

MetricMedical FacilitiesMedical Care Facilities IndustryMedical SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$318.53MC$1.68BC$6.52BC$12.19B
Dividend Yield1.98%3.77%2.67%6.19%
P/E Ratio9.3612.6324.0036.94
Price / Sales1.2218.51516.4210.45
Price / Cash4.607.9027.4882.29
Price / Book2.741.7510.744.47
Net IncomeC$17.17MC$63.03MC$3.57BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-0.82%-0.44%0.58%0.65%
1 Month Performance4.01%0.69%1.48%-0.08%
1 Year Performance14.37%11.07%25.41%41.90%

Medical Facilities Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
DR
Medical Facilities
N/AC$18.15
flat
N/A+14.4%C$318.53MC$260.72M9.361,833
NLH
Nova Leap Health
N/AC$0.36
flat
N/A+37.0%C$31.00MC$32.23M118.33N/A
KDA
KDA Group
N/AC$0.08
-5.9%
N/A-69.8%C$16.00MC$317.01KN/A3,100
PHA
Premier Health of America
N/AC$0.01
-33.3%
N/A-66.7%C$832KC$87.67MN/AN/A
EXE
Extendicare
1.3597 of 5 stars
C$32.07
+1.1%
C$32.56
+1.5%
+130.5%C$3.04BC$1.75B23.6023,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:DR) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners