Free Trial

Medical Facilities (DR) Competitors

Medical Facilities logo
C$17.10 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

DR vs. WELL, NLH, KDA, PHA, and EXE

Should you be buying Medical Facilities stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Medical Facilities include WELL Health Technologies (WELL), Nova Leap Health (NLH), KDA Group (KDA), Premier Health of America (PHA), and Extendicare (EXE). These companies are all part of the "medical care facilities" industry.

How does Medical Facilities compare to WELL Health Technologies?

WELL Health Technologies (TSE:WELL) and Medical Facilities (TSE:DR) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

WELL Health Technologies has a beta of 0.933646, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Medical Facilities has a beta of 0.555884, indicating that its share price is 44% less volatile than the S&P 500.

WELL Health Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Medical Facilities. WELL Health Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Medical Facilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WELL Health TechnologiesC$1.40B0.79C$73.76M-C$0.03N/A
Medical FacilitiesC$254.17M1.18C$17.17MC$1.0915.69

In the previous week, Medical Facilities had 1 more articles in the media than WELL Health Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Medical Facilities and 1 mentions for WELL Health Technologies. WELL Health Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Medical Facilities' score of 0.99 indicating that WELL Health Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
WELL Health Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Medical Facilities
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Medical Facilities has a net margin of 6.83% compared to WELL Health Technologies' net margin of -0.53%. Medical Facilities' return on equity of 27.57% beat WELL Health Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WELL Health Technologies-0.53% -0.87% 2.07%
Medical Facilities 6.83%27.57%13.60%

5.4% of WELL Health Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.0% of Medical Facilities shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.8% of WELL Health Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Medical Facilities shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

WELL Health Technologies presently has a consensus target price of C$6.25, indicating a potential upside of 44.01%. Given WELL Health Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe WELL Health Technologies is more favorable than Medical Facilities.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WELL Health Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Medical Facilities
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

WELL Health Technologies and Medical Facilities tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Medical Facilities compare to Nova Leap Health?

Medical Facilities (TSE:DR) and Nova Leap Health (CVE:NLH) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

15.0% of Medical Facilities shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Nova Leap Health shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Medical Facilities shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.8% of Nova Leap Health shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Medical Facilities has a beta of 0.555884, meaning that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nova Leap Health has a beta of 2.444711, meaning that its stock price is 144% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Medical Facilities had 1 more articles in the media than Nova Leap Health. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Medical Facilities and 1 mentions for Nova Leap Health. Medical Facilities' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Nova Leap Health's score of 0.80 indicating that Medical Facilities is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Medical Facilities
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Nova Leap Health
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Medical Facilities has a net margin of 6.83% compared to Nova Leap Health's net margin of -0.60%. Medical Facilities' return on equity of 27.57% beat Nova Leap Health's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Medical Facilities6.83% 27.57% 13.60%
Nova Leap Health -0.60%-1.02%2.77%

Medical Facilities has higher revenue and earnings than Nova Leap Health. Nova Leap Health is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Medical Facilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Medical FacilitiesC$254.17M1.18C$17.17MC$1.0915.69
Nova Leap HealthC$31.47M0.99-C$300.30K-C$0.00N/A

Summary

Medical Facilities beats Nova Leap Health on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Medical Facilities compare to KDA Group?

Medical Facilities (TSE:DR) and KDA Group (CVE:KDA) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

Medical Facilities has higher revenue and earnings than KDA Group. KDA Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Medical Facilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Medical FacilitiesC$254.17M1.18C$17.17MC$1.0915.69
KDA GroupC$317.01K66.26-C$1.73M-C$0.04N/A

Medical Facilities has a beta of 0.555884, meaning that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, KDA Group has a beta of 0.007648, meaning that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the S&P 500.

15.0% of Medical Facilities shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Medical Facilities shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.5% of KDA Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Medical Facilities had 2 more articles in the media than KDA Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Medical Facilities and 0 mentions for KDA Group. Medical Facilities' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat KDA Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Medical Facilities is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Medical Facilities Positive
KDA Group Neutral

KDA Group has a net margin of 5,414.15% compared to Medical Facilities' net margin of 6.83%. Medical Facilities' return on equity of 27.57% beat KDA Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Medical Facilities6.83% 27.57% 13.60%
KDA Group 5,414.15%-15.93%-11.56%

Summary

Medical Facilities beats KDA Group on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Medical Facilities compare to Premier Health of America?

Premier Health of America (CVE:PHA) and Medical Facilities (TSE:DR) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Medical Facilities has a net margin of 6.83% compared to Premier Health of America's net margin of -17.94%. Premier Health of America's return on equity of 202.02% beat Medical Facilities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premier Health of America-17.94% 202.02% 0.89%
Medical Facilities 6.83%27.57%13.60%

Medical Facilities has higher revenue and earnings than Premier Health of America. Premier Health of America is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Medical Facilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premier Health of AmericaC$87.67M0.02-C$12.50M-C$0.28N/A
Medical FacilitiesC$254.17M1.18C$17.17MC$1.0915.69

Premier Health of America has a beta of -0.191079, suggesting that its stock price is 119% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Medical Facilities has a beta of 0.555884, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Medical Facilities had 2 more articles in the media than Premier Health of America. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Medical Facilities and 0 mentions for Premier Health of America. Medical Facilities' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Premier Health of America's score of 0.00 indicating that Medical Facilities is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Premier Health of America Neutral
Medical Facilities Positive

15.0% of Medical Facilities shares are held by institutional investors. 52.1% of Premier Health of America shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Medical Facilities shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Medical Facilities beats Premier Health of America on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Medical Facilities compare to Extendicare?

Extendicare (TSE:EXE) and Medical Facilities (TSE:DR) are both medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

Extendicare has a beta of 1.1801, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Medical Facilities has a beta of 0.555884, indicating that its share price is 44% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Medical Facilities has a net margin of 6.83% compared to Extendicare's net margin of 5.82%. Extendicare's return on equity of 47.65% beat Medical Facilities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Extendicare5.82% 47.65% 7.16%
Medical Facilities 6.83%27.57%13.60%

21.1% of Extendicare shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.0% of Medical Facilities shares are held by institutional investors. 13.9% of Extendicare shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Medical Facilities shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Extendicare has higher revenue and earnings than Medical Facilities. Medical Facilities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Extendicare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ExtendicareC$1.66B1.72C$65.46MC$1.1127.13
Medical FacilitiesC$254.17M1.18C$17.17MC$1.0915.69

Extendicare pays an annual dividend of C$0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Medical Facilities pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Extendicare pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Medical Facilities pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Extendicare presently has a consensus price target of C$29.38, suggesting a potential downside of 2.73%. Given Extendicare's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Extendicare is more favorable than Medical Facilities.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Extendicare
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.17
Medical Facilities
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Extendicare and Extendicare both had 2 articles in the media. Medical Facilities' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Extendicare's score of 0.82 indicating that Medical Facilities is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Extendicare
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Medical Facilities
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Extendicare beats Medical Facilities on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Medical Facilities News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for DR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding DR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

DR vs. The Competition

MetricMedical FacilitiesMedical Care Facilities IndustryMedical SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$300.67MC$1.55BC$6.25BC$11.72B
Dividend Yield2.09%3.69%2.74%6.22%
P/E Ratio15.697.3024.9123.83
Price / Sales1.1818.56504.5613.46
Price / Cash4.607.9043.3082.69
Price / Book3.041.729.674.48
Net IncomeC$17.17MC$63.03MC$3.55BC$300.68M
7 Day Performance-0.29%-0.17%1.70%0.12%
1 Month Performance3.51%0.72%5.62%2.88%
1 Year Performance14.61%18.87%34.42%57.78%

Medical Facilities Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
DR
Medical Facilities
N/AC$17.10
flat
N/AN/AC$300.67MC$254.17M15.691,833
WELL
WELL Health Technologies
2.6371 of 5 stars
C$4.32
+2.6%
C$6.25
+44.7%
N/AC$1.10BC$1.40BN/A510
NLH
Nova Leap Health
N/AC$0.37
flat
N/AN/AC$32.31MC$31.47MN/AN/A
KDA
KDA Group
N/AC$0.12
flat
N/AN/AC$24.01MC$317.01KN/A3,100
PHA
Premier Health of America
N/AC$0.03
+25.0%
N/AN/AC$1.39MC$87.67MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:DR) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners