Free Trial

Medical Facilities (DR) Competitors

Medical Facilities logo
C$17.70 -0.18 (-1.01%)
As of 06/16/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

DR vs. WELL, NLH, KDA, PHA, and EXE

Should you buy Medical Facilities stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Medical Facilities with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Medical Facilities include WELL Health Technologies (WELL), Nova Leap Health (NLH), KDA Group (KDA), Premier Health of America (PHA), and Extendicare (EXE). These companies are all part of the "medical care facilities" industry.

How does Medical Facilities compare to WELL Health Technologies?

Medical Facilities (TSE:DR) and WELL Health Technologies (TSE:WELL) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and earnings.

WELL Health Technologies has a consensus price target of C$6.92, indicating a potential upside of 56.84%. Given WELL Health Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe WELL Health Technologies is more favorable than Medical Facilities.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Medical Facilities
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
WELL Health Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Medical Facilities has a beta of 0.502064, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WELL Health Technologies has a beta of 0.865672, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

WELL Health Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Medical Facilities. Medical Facilities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WELL Health Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Medical FacilitiesC$260.72M1.19C$17.17MC$1.949.12
WELL Health TechnologiesC$1.47B0.76C$73.76MC$0.1140.09

Medical Facilities has a net margin of 8.51% compared to WELL Health Technologies' net margin of 1.82%. Medical Facilities' return on equity of 31.06% beat WELL Health Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Medical Facilities8.51% 31.06% 13.60%
WELL Health Technologies 1.82%3.15%2.07%

In the previous week, Medical Facilities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled WELL Health Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Medical Facilities Neutral
WELL Health Technologies Neutral

15.7% of Medical Facilities shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of WELL Health Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Medical Facilities shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.8% of WELL Health Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

WELL Health Technologies beats Medical Facilities on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Medical Facilities compare to Nova Leap Health?

Nova Leap Health (CVE:NLH) and Medical Facilities (TSE:DR) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Nova Leap Health had 1 more articles in the media than Medical Facilities. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Nova Leap Health and 0 mentions for Medical Facilities. Nova Leap Health's average media sentiment score of 1.78 beat Medical Facilities' score of 0.00 indicating that Nova Leap Health is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nova Leap Health Very Positive
Medical Facilities Neutral

Medical Facilities has a net margin of 8.51% compared to Nova Leap Health's net margin of 0.64%. Medical Facilities' return on equity of 31.06% beat Nova Leap Health's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nova Leap Health0.64% 1.10% 2.77%
Medical Facilities 8.51%31.06%13.60%

0.0% of Nova Leap Health shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.7% of Medical Facilities shares are held by institutional investors. 40.8% of Nova Leap Health shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Medical Facilities shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Nova Leap Health has a beta of 1.961788, meaning that its share price is 96% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Medical Facilities has a beta of 0.502064, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Medical Facilities has higher revenue and earnings than Nova Leap Health. Medical Facilities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nova Leap Health, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nova Leap HealthC$32.23M1.00-C$300.30KC$0.00123.33
Medical FacilitiesC$260.72M1.19C$17.17MC$1.949.12

Summary

Medical Facilities beats Nova Leap Health on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Medical Facilities compare to KDA Group?

Medical Facilities (TSE:DR) and KDA Group (CVE:KDA) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

15.7% of Medical Facilities shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Medical Facilities shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 25.5% of KDA Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Medical Facilities has a beta of 0.502064, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KDA Group has a beta of -0.394297, indicating that its share price is 139% less volatile than the broader market.

Medical Facilities has higher revenue and earnings than KDA Group. KDA Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Medical Facilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Medical FacilitiesC$260.72M1.19C$17.17MC$1.949.12
KDA GroupC$317.01K47.33-C$1.73M-C$0.04N/A

In the previous week, Medical Facilities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled KDA Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Medical Facilities Neutral
KDA Group Neutral

KDA Group has a net margin of 5,414.15% compared to Medical Facilities' net margin of 8.51%. Medical Facilities' return on equity of 31.06% beat KDA Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Medical Facilities8.51% 31.06% 13.60%
KDA Group 5,414.15%-15.93%-11.56%

Summary

Medical Facilities beats KDA Group on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Medical Facilities compare to Premier Health of America?

Premier Health of America (CVE:PHA) and Medical Facilities (TSE:DR) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Premier Health of America's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Medical Facilities'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Premier Health of America Neutral
Medical Facilities Neutral

Medical Facilities has a net margin of 8.51% compared to Premier Health of America's net margin of -17.94%. Premier Health of America's return on equity of 202.02% beat Medical Facilities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premier Health of America-17.94% 202.02% 0.89%
Medical Facilities 8.51%31.06%13.60%

Premier Health of America has a beta of -0.041415, meaning that its stock price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Medical Facilities has a beta of 0.502064, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

15.7% of Medical Facilities shares are held by institutional investors. 52.1% of Premier Health of America shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Medical Facilities shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Medical Facilities has higher revenue and earnings than Premier Health of America. Premier Health of America is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Medical Facilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premier Health of AmericaC$87.67M0.01-C$12.50M-C$0.28N/A
Medical FacilitiesC$260.72M1.19C$17.17MC$1.949.12

Summary

Medical Facilities beats Premier Health of America on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Medical Facilities compare to Extendicare?

Extendicare (TSE:EXE) and Medical Facilities (TSE:DR) are both medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

24.2% of Extendicare shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.7% of Medical Facilities shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.9% of Extendicare shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Medical Facilities shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Extendicare's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Medical Facilities'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Extendicare Neutral
Medical Facilities Neutral

Extendicare pays an annual dividend of C$0.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Medical Facilities pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Extendicare pays out 37.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Medical Facilities pays out 13.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Medical Facilities has a net margin of 8.51% compared to Extendicare's net margin of 6.99%. Extendicare's return on equity of 45.35% beat Medical Facilities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Extendicare6.99% 45.35% 7.16%
Medical Facilities 8.51%31.06%13.60%

Extendicare has higher revenue and earnings than Medical Facilities. Medical Facilities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Extendicare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ExtendicareC$1.75B1.83C$65.46MC$1.3624.89
Medical FacilitiesC$260.72M1.19C$17.17MC$1.949.12

Extendicare has a beta of 1.57403, indicating that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Medical Facilities has a beta of 0.502064, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Extendicare presently has a consensus target price of C$32.56, suggesting a potential downside of 3.74%. Given Extendicare's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Extendicare is more favorable than Medical Facilities.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Extendicare
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Medical Facilities
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Extendicare beats Medical Facilities on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Medical Facilities News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for DR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding DR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

DR vs. The Competition

MetricMedical FacilitiesMedical Care Facilities IndustryMedical SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$310.64MC$1.71BC$6.49BC$12.36B
Dividend Yield1.98%3.76%2.67%6.19%
P/E Ratio9.1212.6123.8736.65
Price / Sales1.1918.22524.2410.70
Price / Cash4.607.9044.1382.29
Price / Book2.671.7710.504.54
Net IncomeC$17.17MC$63.03MC$3.56BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-2.16%0.27%0.88%3.48%
1 Month Performance1.43%0.57%1.53%0.75%
1 Year Performance11.67%11.28%26.46%42.95%

Medical Facilities Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
DR
Medical Facilities
N/AC$17.70
-1.0%
N/A+11.1%C$310.64MC$260.72M9.121,833
WELL
WELL Health Technologies
1.7737 of 5 stars
C$4.54
-3.0%
C$6.92
+52.3%
+11.9%C$1.16BC$1.47B41.27510
NLH
Nova Leap Health
N/AC$0.35
flat
N/A+48.0%C$30.12MC$32.23M115.00N/A
KDA
KDA Group
N/AC$0.08
flat
N/A-70.6%C$16.00MC$317.01KN/A3,100
PHA
Premier Health of America
N/AC$0.02
flat
N/A-84.6%C$1.11MC$87.67MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:DR) was last updated on 6/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners