Go Pro

Medical Facilities (DR) Competitors

Medical Facilities logo
C$18.10 +0.06 (+0.33%)
As of 07/28/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

DR vs. WELL, NLH, KDA, PHA, and EXE

Should you buy Medical Facilities stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Medical Facilities with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Medical Facilities include WELL Health Technologies (WELL), Nova Leap Health (NLH), KDA Group (KDA), Premier Health of America (PHA), and Extendicare (EXE). These companies are all part of the "medical care facilities" industry.

How does Medical Facilities compare to WELL Health Technologies?

WELL Health Technologies (TSE:WELL) and Medical Facilities (TSE:DR) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Medical Facilities has a net margin of 14.01% compared to WELL Health Technologies' net margin of 1.82%. Medical Facilities' return on equity of 51.33% beat WELL Health Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WELL Health Technologies1.82% 3.15% 2.07%
Medical Facilities 14.01%51.33%13.60%

WELL Health Technologies currently has a consensus target price of C$7.13, indicating a potential upside of 77.68%. Given WELL Health Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe WELL Health Technologies is more favorable than Medical Facilities.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WELL Health Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Medical Facilities
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

WELL Health Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Medical Facilities. Medical Facilities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WELL Health Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WELL Health TechnologiesC$1.47B0.69C$73.76MC$0.1136.45
Medical FacilitiesC$260.72M1.22C$17.17MC$1.949.33

In the previous week, WELL Health Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Medical Facilities'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
WELL Health Technologies Neutral
Medical Facilities Neutral

5.4% of WELL Health Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.3% of Medical Facilities shares are held by institutional investors. 6.8% of WELL Health Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Medical Facilities shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

WELL Health Technologies has a beta of 0.900556, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Medical Facilities has a beta of 0.496135, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

WELL Health Technologies beats Medical Facilities on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Medical Facilities compare to Nova Leap Health?

Nova Leap Health (CVE:NLH) and Medical Facilities (TSE:DR) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Medical Facilities has higher revenue and earnings than Nova Leap Health. Medical Facilities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nova Leap Health, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nova Leap HealthC$32.23M1.19-C$300.30KC$0.00146.67
Medical FacilitiesC$260.72M1.22C$17.17MC$1.949.33

In the previous week, Nova Leap Health's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Medical Facilities'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nova Leap Health Neutral
Medical Facilities Neutral

0.0% of Nova Leap Health shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.3% of Medical Facilities shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.8% of Nova Leap Health shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Medical Facilities shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Nova Leap Health has a beta of 1.695796, indicating that its share price is 70% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Medical Facilities has a beta of 0.496135, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Medical Facilities has a net margin of 14.01% compared to Nova Leap Health's net margin of 0.64%. Medical Facilities' return on equity of 51.33% beat Nova Leap Health's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nova Leap Health0.64% 1.10% 2.77%
Medical Facilities 14.01%51.33%13.60%

Summary

Medical Facilities beats Nova Leap Health on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Medical Facilities compare to KDA Group?

Medical Facilities (TSE:DR) and KDA Group (CVE:KDA) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings, valuation and dividends.

16.3% of Medical Facilities shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Medical Facilities shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.5% of KDA Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Medical Facilities has a beta of 0.496135, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KDA Group has a beta of -0.399589, meaning that its share price is 140% less volatile than the broader market.

KDA Group has a net margin of 5,414.15% compared to Medical Facilities' net margin of 14.01%. Medical Facilities' return on equity of 51.33% beat KDA Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Medical Facilities14.01% 51.33% 13.60%
KDA Group 5,414.15%-15.93%-11.56%

Medical Facilities has higher revenue and earnings than KDA Group. KDA Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Medical Facilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Medical FacilitiesC$260.72M1.22C$17.17MC$1.949.33
KDA GroupC$419.13K39.26-C$1.73M-C$0.03N/A

In the previous week, Medical Facilities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled KDA Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Medical Facilities Neutral
KDA Group Neutral

Summary

Medical Facilities beats KDA Group on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Medical Facilities compare to Premier Health of America?

Premier Health of America (CVE:PHA) and Medical Facilities (TSE:DR) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

Medical Facilities has a net margin of 14.01% compared to Premier Health of America's net margin of -17.94%. Premier Health of America's return on equity of 202.02% beat Medical Facilities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premier Health of America-17.94% 202.02% 0.89%
Medical Facilities 14.01%51.33%13.60%

Premier Health of America has a beta of -0.041415, suggesting that its share price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Medical Facilities has a beta of 0.496135, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Premier Health of America's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Medical Facilities'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Premier Health of America Neutral
Medical Facilities Neutral

Medical Facilities has higher revenue and earnings than Premier Health of America. Premier Health of America is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Medical Facilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premier Health of AmericaC$87.67M0.00-C$12.50M-C$0.28N/A
Medical FacilitiesC$260.72M1.22C$17.17MC$1.949.33

16.3% of Medical Facilities shares are held by institutional investors. 52.1% of Premier Health of America shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Medical Facilities shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Medical Facilities beats Premier Health of America on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Medical Facilities compare to Extendicare?

Extendicare (TSE:EXE) and Medical Facilities (TSE:DR) are both medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Extendicare's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Medical Facilities'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Extendicare Neutral
Medical Facilities Neutral

Extendicare has higher revenue and earnings than Medical Facilities. Medical Facilities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Extendicare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ExtendicareC$1.75B2.08C$65.46MC$1.3628.26
Medical FacilitiesC$260.72M1.22C$17.17MC$1.949.33

Extendicare has a beta of 1.580825, indicating that its share price is 58% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Medical Facilities has a beta of 0.496135, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Extendicare pays an annual dividend of C$0.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Medical Facilities pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Extendicare pays out 37.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Medical Facilities pays out 13.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Medical Facilities is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

29.2% of Extendicare shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.3% of Medical Facilities shares are held by institutional investors. 13.9% of Extendicare shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Medical Facilities shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Medical Facilities has a net margin of 14.01% compared to Extendicare's net margin of 6.99%. Medical Facilities' return on equity of 51.33% beat Extendicare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Extendicare6.99% 45.35% 7.16%
Medical Facilities 14.01%51.33%13.60%

Extendicare presently has a consensus price target of C$32.56, suggesting a potential downside of 15.22%. Given Extendicare's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Extendicare is more favorable than Medical Facilities.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Extendicare
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Medical Facilities
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Extendicare beats Medical Facilities on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Medical Facilities News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for DR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding DR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

DR vs. The Competition

MetricMedical FacilitiesMedical Care Facilities IndustryMedical SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$317.66MC$1.68BC$7.08BC$13.02B
Dividend Yield2.01%3.86%2.66%6.19%
P/E Ratio9.3313.3527.2736.56
Price / Sales1.2217.98578.569.44
Price / Cash4.607.9049.6082.29
Price / Book2.731.9110.114.38
Net IncomeC$17.17MC$63.03MC$3.60BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance0.95%1.42%-0.95%-0.88%
1 Month Performance-0.28%0.77%-3.59%0.12%
1 Year Performance22.63%19.49%20.53%30.04%

Medical Facilities Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
DR
Medical Facilities
N/AC$18.10
+0.3%
N/A+21.7%C$317.66MC$260.72M9.331,833
WELL
WELL Health Technologies
2.6098 of 5 stars
C$4.24
-0.5%
C$7.13
+68.0%
-15.9%C$1.09BC$1.47B38.55510
NLH
Nova Leap Health
N/AC$0.38
flat
N/A+79.6%C$33.18MC$32.23M126.67N/A
KDA
KDA Group
N/AC$0.08
+6.7%
N/A-75.4%C$18.80MC$419.13KN/A3,100
PHA
Premier Health of America
N/AC$0.01
flat
N/A-88.9%C$278KC$87.67MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:DR) was last updated on 7/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners