Energy Fuels (EFR) Competitors

Cogeco Communications (TSE:CCA) and Energy Fuels (TSE:EFR) are both communication services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, community ranking, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

Do analysts recommend CCA or EFR?

Cogeco Communications presently has a consensus price target of C$76.10, indicating a potential upside of 11.00%. Given Cogeco Communications' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Cogeco Communications is more favorable than Energy Fuels.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cogeco Communications	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.78
Energy Fuels	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00

Is CCA or EFR more profitable?

Cogeco Communications has a net margin of 11.68% compared to Energy Fuels' net margin of -90.40%. Cogeco Communications' return on equity of 11.56% beat Energy Fuels' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cogeco Communications	11.68%	11.56%	4.96%
Energy Fuels	-90.40%	-9.25%	-4.04%

Which has more risk and volatility, CCA or EFR?

Cogeco Communications has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Does the MarketBeat Community believe in CCA or EFR?

Cogeco Communications received 249 more outperform votes than Energy Fuels when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 76.30% of users gave Energy Fuels an outperform vote while only 58.99% of users gave Cogeco Communications an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Cogeco Communications	Outperform Votes 410 58.99%	Underperform Votes 285 41.01%
Energy Fuels	Outperform Votes 161 76.30%	Underperform Votes 50 23.70%

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in CCA or EFR?

43.4% of Cogeco Communications shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.9% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cogeco Communications shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, CCA or EFR?

Cogeco Communications has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cogeco Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cogeco Communications	C$2.97B	0.97	C$346.48M	C$8.26	8.30
Energy Fuels	C$32.84M	26.58	-C$29.68M	-C$0.30	-20.82

Does the media prefer CCA or EFR?

In the previous week, Cogeco Communications had 1 more articles in the media than Energy Fuels. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Cogeco Communications and 2 mentions for Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Cogeco Communications' score of 0.60 indicating that Energy Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cogeco Communications	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Energy Fuels	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Cogeco Communications beats Energy Fuels on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.