Do analysts prefer FAR or NDM?

Foraco International presently has a consensus target price of C$4.50, indicating a potential upside of 64.23%. Given Foraco International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Foraco International is more favorable than Northern Dynasty Minerals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Foraco International 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Northern Dynasty Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts rate FIL or FAR?

Foraco International has a consensus target price of C$4.50, suggesting a potential upside of 64.23%. Given Foraco International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Foraco International is more favorable than Filo Mining. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Filo Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Foraco International 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts rate ITH or FAR?

Foraco International has a consensus price target of C$4.50, suggesting a potential upside of 64.23%. Given Foraco International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Foraco International is more favorable than International Tower Hill Mines. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score International Tower Hill Mines 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Foraco International 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts rate SLL or FAR?

Foraco International has a consensus target price of C$4.50, indicating a potential upside of 64.23%. Given Foraco International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Foraco International is more favorable than Standard Lithium. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Standard Lithium 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Foraco International 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Foraco International (FAR) Competitors

C$2.74 -0.02 (-0.72%)

As of 09/23/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

FAR vs. NDM, FIL, ITH, ODV, and SLL

Should you buy Foraco International stock or one of its competitors? Foraco International's main competitors and comparable companies include Northern Dynasty Minerals (NDM), Filo Mining (FIL), International Tower Hill Mines (ITH), Osisko Development (ODV), and Standard Lithium (SLL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Foraco International compare to Northern Dynasty Minerals?

Foraco International (TSE:FAR) and Northern Dynasty Minerals (TSE:NDM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation and analyst recommendations.

14.0% of Foraco International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of Northern Dynasty Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.7% of Foraco International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Northern Dynasty Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Foraco International has higher revenue and earnings than Northern Dynasty Minerals. Northern Dynasty Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Foraco International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Foraco International	C$284.89M	0.94	C$19.15M	C$0.12	21.97
Northern Dynasty Minerals	N/A	N/A	-C$17.31M	-C$0.12	N/A

Foraco International presently has a consensus target price of C$4.50, indicating a potential upside of 64.23%. Given Foraco International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Foraco International is more favorable than Northern Dynasty Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Foraco International	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Northern Dynasty Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Northern Dynasty Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Foraco International. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Northern Dynasty Minerals and 0 mentions for Foraco International. Northern Dynasty Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Foraco International's score of 0.00 indicating that Northern Dynasty Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Foraco International	Neutral
Northern Dynasty Minerals	Positive

Foraco International has a beta of 1.397876, meaning that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Northern Dynasty Minerals has a beta of -0.408945, meaning that its stock price is 141% less volatile than the broader market.

Foraco International has a net margin of 4.35% compared to Northern Dynasty Minerals' net margin of 0.00%. Foraco International's return on equity of 12.49% beat Northern Dynasty Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Foraco International	4.35%	12.49%	13.19%
Northern Dynasty Minerals	N/A	-203.61%	-8.16%

Summary

Foraco International beats Northern Dynasty Minerals on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Foraco International compare to Filo Mining?

Filo Mining (CVE:FIL) and Foraco International (TSE:FAR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

Foraco International has a net margin of 4.35% compared to Filo Mining's net margin of 0.00%. Foraco International's return on equity of 12.49% beat Filo Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Filo Mining	N/A	N/A	N/A
Foraco International	4.35%	12.49%	13.19%

Foraco International has higher revenue and earnings than Filo Mining. Filo Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Foraco International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Filo Mining	N/A	N/A	N/A	-C$0.19	N/A
Foraco International	C$284.89M	0.94	C$19.15M	C$0.12	21.97

Foraco International has a consensus target price of C$4.50, suggesting a potential upside of 64.23%. Given Foraco International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Foraco International is more favorable than Filo Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Filo Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Foraco International	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

14.0% of Foraco International shares are held by institutional investors. 35.7% of Foraco International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Filo Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Foraco International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Filo Mining	Neutral
Foraco International	Neutral

Summary

Foraco International beats Filo Mining on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Foraco International compare to International Tower Hill Mines?

International Tower Hill Mines (TSE:ITH) and Foraco International (TSE:FAR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and profitability.

8.6% of International Tower Hill Mines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.0% of Foraco International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of International Tower Hill Mines shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 35.7% of Foraco International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Foraco International has a net margin of 4.35% compared to International Tower Hill Mines' net margin of 0.00%. Foraco International's return on equity of 12.49% beat International Tower Hill Mines' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
International Tower Hill Mines	N/A	-2.74%	-3.65%
Foraco International	4.35%	12.49%	13.19%

Foraco International has higher revenue and earnings than International Tower Hill Mines. International Tower Hill Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Foraco International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
International Tower Hill Mines	N/A	N/A	-C$2.36M	-C$0.01	N/A
Foraco International	C$284.89M	0.94	C$19.15M	C$0.12	21.97

Foraco International has a consensus price target of C$4.50, suggesting a potential upside of 64.23%. Given Foraco International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Foraco International is more favorable than International Tower Hill Mines.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
International Tower Hill Mines	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Foraco International	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

International Tower Hill Mines has a beta of 2.496683, indicating that its stock price is 150% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Foraco International has a beta of 1.397876, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, International Tower Hill Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Foraco International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
International Tower Hill Mines	Neutral
Foraco International	Neutral

Summary

Foraco International beats International Tower Hill Mines on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Foraco International compare to Osisko Development?

Osisko Development (CVE:ODV) and Foraco International (TSE:FAR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Osisko Development had 1 more articles in the media than Foraco International. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Osisko Development and 0 mentions for Foraco International. Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Foraco International's score of 0.00 indicating that Osisko Development is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Osisko Development	Positive
Foraco International	Neutral

21.8% of Osisko Development shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.0% of Foraco International shares are held by institutional investors. 34.4% of Osisko Development shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.7% of Foraco International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Osisko Development presently has a consensus price target of C$9.00, indicating a potential upside of 180.37%. Foraco International has a consensus price target of C$4.50, indicating a potential upside of 64.23%. Given Osisko Development's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Osisko Development is more favorable than Foraco International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Osisko Development	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00
Foraco International	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Osisko Development has a net margin of 149.54% compared to Foraco International's net margin of 4.35%. Foraco International's return on equity of 12.49% beat Osisko Development's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Osisko Development	149.54%	11.45%	-16.19%
Foraco International	4.35%	12.49%	13.19%

Osisko Development has a beta of 2.221719, indicating that its share price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Foraco International has a beta of 1.397876, indicating that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Foraco International has higher revenue and earnings than Osisko Development. Osisko Development is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Foraco International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Osisko Development	C$37.69M	25.95	-C$332.96M	-C$0.49	N/A
Foraco International	C$284.89M	0.94	C$19.15M	C$0.12	21.97

Summary

Osisko Development beats Foraco International on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Foraco International compare to Standard Lithium?

Standard Lithium (CVE:SLL) and Foraco International (TSE:FAR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Standard Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Foraco International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Standard Lithium	Neutral
Foraco International	Neutral

Foraco International has a consensus target price of C$4.50, indicating a potential upside of 64.23%. Given Foraco International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Foraco International is more favorable than Standard Lithium.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Standard Lithium	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Foraco International	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Foraco International has higher revenue and earnings than Standard Lithium. Standard Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Foraco International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Standard Lithium	N/A	N/A	N/A	-C$0.21	N/A
Foraco International	C$284.89M	0.94	C$19.15M	C$0.12	21.97

14.0% of Foraco International shares are held by institutional investors. 35.7% of Foraco International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Foraco International has a net margin of 4.35% compared to Standard Lithium's net margin of 0.00%. Foraco International's return on equity of 12.49% beat Standard Lithium's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Standard Lithium	N/A	N/A	N/A
Foraco International	4.35%	12.49%	13.19%

Summary

Foraco International beats Standard Lithium on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Foraco International News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FAR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Foraco International	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$270.07M	C$3.96B	C$4.94B	C$12.84B
Dividend Yield	2.52%	5.21%	4.71%	6.27%
P/E Ratio	21.97	25.75	26.09	40.36
Price / Sales	0.94	30,482.17	18,089.90	9.35
Price / Cash	5.54	29.47	26.89	82.29
Price / Book	2.51	12.20	10.14	4.69
Net Income	C$19.15M	C$127.53M	C$158.14M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	0.74%	0.83%	0.51%	0.01%
1 Month Performance	-4.20%	-2.28%	-2.18%	-2.14%
1 Year Performance	23.98%	30.31%	25.42%	20.17%

Foraco International Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FAR Foraco International	N/A	C$2.74 -0.7%	C$4.50 +64.2%	+26.3%	C$270.07M	C$284.89M	21.97	2,139	News Coverage
NDM Northern Dynasty Minerals	N/A	C$1.84 +3.4%	N/A	+52.3%	C$1.03B	N/A	N/A	N/A	Positive News
FIL Filo Mining	N/A	C$8.97 -0.1%	N/A	+0.0%	C$1.02B	N/A	N/A	40
ITH International Tower Hill Mines	N/A	C$3.83 +12.0%	N/A	+79.2%	C$1.00B	N/A	N/A	220	Gap Down High Trading Volume
ODV Osisko Development	1.248 of 5 stars	C$3.21 flat	C$9.00 +180.4%	-28.5%	C$978.15M	C$37.69M	N/A	310

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:FAR) was last updated on 9/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Foraco International (FAR) Competitors

FAR vs. NDM, FIL, ITH, ODV, and SLL

How does Foraco International compare to Northern Dynasty Minerals?

Summary

How does Foraco International compare to Filo Mining?

Summary

How does Foraco International compare to International Tower Hill Mines?

Summary

How does Foraco International compare to Osisko Development?

Summary

How does Foraco International compare to Standard Lithium?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FAR vs. The Competition

Foraco International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Foraco International (FAR) Competitors

FAR vs. NDM, FIL, ITH, ODV, and SLL

How does Foraco International compare to Northern Dynasty Minerals?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in FAR or NDM?

Which has better valuation & earnings, FAR or NDM?

Do analysts prefer FAR or NDM?

Does the media prefer FAR or NDM?

Which has more volatility and risk, FAR or NDM?

Is FAR or NDM more profitable?

Summary

How does Foraco International compare to Filo Mining?

Is FIL or FAR more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, FIL or FAR?

Do analysts rate FIL or FAR?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of FIL or FAR?

Does the media refer more to FIL or FAR?

Summary

How does Foraco International compare to International Tower Hill Mines?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ITH or FAR?

Is ITH or FAR more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, ITH or FAR?

Do analysts rate ITH or FAR?

Which has more volatility & risk, ITH or FAR?

Does the media favor ITH or FAR?

Summary

How does Foraco International compare to Osisko Development?

Does the media refer more to ODV or FAR?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in ODV or FAR?

Do analysts recommend ODV or FAR?

Is ODV or FAR more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, ODV or FAR?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, ODV or FAR?

Summary

How does Foraco International compare to Standard Lithium?

Does the media refer more to SLL or FAR?

Do analysts rate SLL or FAR?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, SLL or FAR?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in SLL or FAR?

Is SLL or FAR more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FAR vs. The Competition

Foraco International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools