FT vs. GLO, NCA, BUI, AVK, AEF, PML, MCR, EVT, NIM, and HYI
Should you be buying Fortune Minerals stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Fortune Minerals include Global Atomic (GLO), NewCastle Gold (NCA), Buhler Industries (BUI), Avnel Gold Mining (AVK), Acasta Enterprises (AEF), Panoro Minerals (PML), Macro Enterprises (MCR), Economic Investment Trust (EVT), Nicola Mining (NIM), and Horizons Active High Yield Bond ETF Common (HYI). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.
Fortune Minerals vs. Its Competitors
Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and Global Atomic (TSE:GLO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.
15.4% of Global Atomic shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.2% of Global Atomic shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
In the previous week, Global Atomic had 6 more articles in the media than Fortune Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Global Atomic and 1 mentions for Fortune Minerals. Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Global Atomic's score of -0.32 indicating that Fortune Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Fortune Minerals presently has a consensus target price of C$0.42, suggesting a potential upside of 320.00%. Global Atomic has a consensus target price of C$1.88, suggesting a potential upside of 156.85%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Global Atomic.
Fortune Minerals has a beta of 0.01, suggesting that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Global Atomic has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Global Atomic has a net margin of -955.83% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 30.09% beat Global Atomic's return on equity.
Fortune Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Global Atomic. Global Atomic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Summary
Fortune Minerals beats Global Atomic on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Fortune Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip ChartMedia Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
Fortune Minerals Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (TSE:FT) was last updated on 7/3/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff