Go Pro
→ CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent? (From Paradigm Press) (Ad)tc pixel Free FT Stock Alerts

Fortune Minerals (FT) Competitors

Fortune Minerals logo
C$0.14 -0.01 (-3.45%)
As of 03:59 PM Eastern
Compare

FT vs. GSV, S, MNO, NB, and GMX

Should you buy Fortune Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Fortune Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include Gold Standard Ventures (GSV), Sherritt International (S), Meridian Mining UK Societas (MNO), NioCorp Developments (NB), and Globex Mining Enterprises (GMX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "diversified metals & mining" industry.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Gold Standard Ventures?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and Gold Standard Ventures (TSE:GSV) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than Gold Standard Ventures. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Fortune Minerals and 0 mentions for Gold Standard Ventures. Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Gold Standard Ventures' score of 0.00 indicating that Fortune Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals Neutral
Gold Standard Ventures Neutral

Gold Standard Ventures has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 80.32% beat Gold Standard Ventures' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals-13,690.93% 80.32% -5.38%
Gold Standard Ventures N/A N/A N/A

Fortune Minerals presently has a consensus target price of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 350.00%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Gold Standard Ventures.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Gold Standard Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gold Standard Ventures, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A
Gold Standard VenturesN/AN/AN/A-C$0.03N/A

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats Gold Standard Ventures on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Sherritt International?

Sherritt International (TSE:S) and Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

1.6% of Sherritt International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Sherritt International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Sherritt International. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Fortune Minerals and 1 mentions for Sherritt International. Sherritt International's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Fortune Minerals' score of 0.25 indicating that Sherritt International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sherritt International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fortune Minerals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Sherritt International presently has a consensus price target of C$0.30, suggesting a potential upside of 20.00%. Fortune Minerals has a consensus price target of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 350.00%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Sherritt International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sherritt International
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Sherritt International has a beta of -0.180255, meaning that its stock price is 118% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.748342, meaning that its stock price is 275% less volatile than the broader market.

Sherritt International has a net margin of -86.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 80.32% beat Sherritt International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sherritt International-86.00% -20.46% -2.60%
Fortune Minerals -13,690.93%80.32%-5.38%

Fortune Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sherritt International. Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sherritt International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sherritt InternationalC$188.50M0.93-C$130.60M-C$0.21N/A
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats Sherritt International on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Meridian Mining UK Societas?

Meridian Mining UK Societas (CVE:MNO) and Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Meridian Mining UK Societas presently has a consensus price target of C$3.50, indicating a potential upside of 239.81%. Fortune Minerals has a consensus price target of C$0.63, indicating a potential upside of 350.00%. Given Fortune Minerals' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Meridian Mining UK Societas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Meridian Mining UK Societas
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Meridian Mining UK Societas has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 80.32% beat Meridian Mining UK Societas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Meridian Mining UK SocietasN/A N/A N/A
Fortune Minerals -13,690.93%80.32%-5.38%

Fortune Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Meridian Mining UK Societas. Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Meridian Mining UK Societas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Meridian Mining UK Societas-C$4.33K-35,148.07-C$46.07M-C$0.31N/A
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A

In the previous week, Meridian Mining UK Societas and Meridian Mining UK Societas both had 2 articles in the media. Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Meridian Mining UK Societas' score of 0.00 indicating that Fortune Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Meridian Mining UK Societas Neutral
Fortune Minerals Neutral

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats Meridian Mining UK Societas on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to NioCorp Developments?

NioCorp Developments (TSE:NB) and Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

NioCorp Developments has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 80.32% beat NioCorp Developments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NioCorp DevelopmentsN/A -772.20% -45.77%
Fortune Minerals -13,690.93%80.32%-5.38%

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than NioCorp Developments. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Fortune Minerals and 0 mentions for NioCorp Developments. Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat NioCorp Developments' score of -0.26 indicating that Fortune Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
NioCorp Developments Neutral
Fortune Minerals Neutral

Fortune Minerals has a consensus price target of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 350.00%. Given Fortune Minerals' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than NioCorp Developments.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NioCorp Developments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NioCorp Developments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NioCorp DevelopmentsN/AN/A-C$12.66M-C$1.77N/A
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A

NioCorp Developments has a beta of 0.13, indicating that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.748342, indicating that its share price is 275% less volatile than the broader market.

4.8% of NioCorp Developments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.0% of NioCorp Developments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats NioCorp Developments on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Globex Mining Enterprises?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and Globex Mining Enterprises (TSE:GMX) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

Globex Mining Enterprises has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Minerals. Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Globex Mining Enterprises, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A
Globex Mining EnterprisesC$2.72M44.17C$4.51MC$0.1514.07

Fortune Minerals presently has a consensus target price of C$0.63, indicating a potential upside of 350.00%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Globex Mining Enterprises.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Globex Mining Enterprises
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals and Fortune Minerals both had 2 articles in the media. Globex Mining Enterprises' average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Fortune Minerals' score of 0.25 indicating that Globex Mining Enterprises is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Globex Mining Enterprises
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Globex Mining Enterprises has a net margin of 312.40% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 80.32% beat Globex Mining Enterprises' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals-13,690.93% 80.32% -5.38%
Globex Mining Enterprises 312.40%20.67%3.16%

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Globex Mining Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.4% of Globex Mining Enterprises shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.748342, meaning that its stock price is 275% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Globex Mining Enterprises has a beta of 0.546812, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Globex Mining Enterprises beats Fortune Minerals on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fortune Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFortune MineralsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$93.82MC$3.87BC$4.85BC$12.56B
Dividend Yield4.62%5.21%4.72%6.28%
P/E Ratio-14.0025.7526.0940.36
Price / SalesN/A30,402.7118,061.009.35
Price / Cash70.0029.3226.7582.29
Price / Book-15.6912.1910.134.69
Net Income-C$3.22MC$127.53MC$158.14MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-3.45%2.37%1.75%1.06%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-2.08%-2.11%-2.36%
1 Year PerformanceN/A31.16%26.08%20.59%

Fortune Minerals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FT
Fortune Minerals
2.2243 of 5 stars		C$0.14
-3.4%		C$0.63
+350.0%		+93.3%C$93.82MN/AN/A3
GSV
Gold Standard Ventures
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$200.89MN/AN/A20
S
Sherritt International
2.3074 of 5 stars		C$0.23
-2.1%		C$0.30
+30.4%		+100.0%C$161.91MC$188.50MN/A1,200
MNO
Meridian Mining UK Societas
N/AC$1.03
+9.6%		C$3.25
+215.5%		+0.0%C$152.09M-C$4.33KN/AN/A
NB
NioCorp Developments
0.0345 of 5 stars		N/AN/AN/AC$124.34MN/AN/A7

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:FT) was last updated on 9/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s Why Trump Won’t End The Iran War
Trump has called an Iran deal close 38 times since the war began, yet the fighting keeps flaring back up. O...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Bank of America: 'Digital Dollar Inevitable'
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel