Go Pro
→ Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside) (From InvestorPlace) (Ad)tc pixel Free FT Stock Alerts

Fortune Minerals (FT) Competitors

Fortune Minerals logo
C$0.14 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 03:59 PM Eastern
Compare

FT vs. ML, TI, GSV, S, and MNO

Should you buy Fortune Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Fortune Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include Millennial Lithium (ML), Titan Mining (TI), Gold Standard Ventures (GSV), Sherritt International (S), and Meridian Mining UK Societas (MNO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "diversified metals & mining" industry.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Millennial Lithium?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and Millennial Lithium (CVE:ML) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and media sentiment.

Fortune Minerals presently has a consensus target price of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 350.00%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Millennial Lithium.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Millennial Lithium
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Millennial Lithium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 80.32% beat Millennial Lithium's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals-13,690.93% 80.32% -5.38%
Millennial Lithium N/A N/A N/A

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Millennial Lithium. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fortune Minerals and 0 mentions for Millennial Lithium. Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Millennial Lithium'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals Neutral
Millennial Lithium Neutral

Millennial Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A
Millennial LithiumN/AN/AN/A-C$0.20N/A

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats Millennial Lithium on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Titan Mining?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and Titan Mining (TSE:TI) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and dividends.

Titan Mining has a net margin of -10.58% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 80.32% beat Titan Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals-13,690.93% 80.32% -5.38%
Titan Mining -10.58%-67.15%-3.50%

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Titan Mining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fortune Minerals and 0 mentions for Titan Mining. Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Titan Mining's score of -0.64 indicating that Fortune Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals Neutral
Titan Mining Negative

Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.544803, indicating that its share price is 254% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Titan Mining has a beta of -0.994185, indicating that its share price is 199% less volatile than the broader market.

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.5% of Titan Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 57.3% of Titan Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fortune Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Titan Mining. Titan Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A
Titan MiningC$87.18M4.78-C$8.33M-C$0.09N/A

Fortune Minerals currently has a consensus target price of C$0.63, indicating a potential upside of 350.00%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Titan Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Titan Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats Titan Mining on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Gold Standard Ventures?

Gold Standard Ventures (TSE:GSV) and Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

Fortune Minerals has a consensus target price of C$0.63, indicating a potential upside of 350.00%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Gold Standard Ventures.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gold Standard Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Gold Standard Ventures. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fortune Minerals and 0 mentions for Gold Standard Ventures. Gold Standard Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fortune Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gold Standard Ventures Neutral
Fortune Minerals Neutral

Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gold Standard Ventures, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gold Standard VenturesN/AN/AN/A-C$0.03N/A
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A

Gold Standard Ventures has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 80.32% beat Gold Standard Ventures' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gold Standard VenturesN/A N/A N/A
Fortune Minerals -13,690.93%80.32%-5.38%

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats Gold Standard Ventures on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Sherritt International?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and Sherritt International (TSE:S) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.544803, suggesting that its share price is 254% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sherritt International has a beta of -0.725285, suggesting that its share price is 173% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals and Fortune Minerals both had 1 articles in the media. Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sherritt International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Sherritt International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Fortune Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sherritt International. Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sherritt International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A
Sherritt InternationalC$188.50M0.99-C$130.60M-C$0.21N/A

Sherritt International has a net margin of -86.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 80.32% beat Sherritt International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals-13,690.93% 80.32% -5.38%
Sherritt International -86.00%-20.46%-2.60%

Fortune Minerals presently has a consensus target price of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 350.00%. Sherritt International has a consensus target price of C$0.30, suggesting a potential upside of 13.21%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Sherritt International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Sherritt International
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of Sherritt International shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Sherritt International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats Sherritt International on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Meridian Mining UK Societas?

Meridian Mining UK Societas (CVE:MNO) and Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Meridian Mining UK Societas. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fortune Minerals and 0 mentions for Meridian Mining UK Societas. Meridian Mining UK Societas' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fortune Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Meridian Mining UK Societas Neutral
Fortune Minerals Neutral

Meridian Mining UK Societas has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 80.32% beat Meridian Mining UK Societas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Meridian Mining UK SocietasN/A N/A N/A
Fortune Minerals -13,690.93%80.32%-5.38%

Meridian Mining UK Societas presently has a consensus price target of C$3.25, suggesting a potential upside of 215.53%. Fortune Minerals has a consensus price target of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 350.00%. Given Fortune Minerals' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Meridian Mining UK Societas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Meridian Mining UK Societas
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Fortune Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Meridian Mining UK Societas. Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Meridian Mining UK Societas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Meridian Mining UK Societas-C$4.33K-35,148.07-C$46.07M-C$0.31N/A
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats Meridian Mining UK Societas on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fortune Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFortune MineralsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$93.82MC$4.06BC$5.07BC$12.52B
Dividend Yield4.62%5.17%4.68%6.24%
P/E Ratio-14.0025.5526.1639.47
Price / SalesN/A8,892.195,289.379.82
Price / Cash70.0029.5826.9882.29
Price / Book-15.6912.7310.634.71
Net Income-C$3.22MC$125.14MC$156.32MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-6.67%-1.20%-0.98%-1.21%
1 Month Performance12.00%24.03%18.38%4.89%
1 Year PerformanceN/A56.14%44.32%28.63%

Fortune Minerals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FT
Fortune Minerals
1.4984 of 5 stars		C$0.14
flat		C$0.63
+350.0%		+86.7%C$93.82MN/AN/A3
ML
Millennial Lithium
N/AC$4.04
+2.0%		N/A+0.0%C$395.36MN/AN/A560
TI
Titan Mining
N/AC$3.98
-1.7%		N/A+253.3%C$391.19MC$87.18MN/A142
GSV
Gold Standard Ventures
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$200.89MN/AN/A20
S
Sherritt International
1.2798 of 5 stars		C$0.29
-6.6%		C$0.30
+5.3%		+89.3%C$200.63MC$188.50MN/A1,200

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:FT) was last updated on 9/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel