Free Trial
→ Why this tiny stock may move before the SpaceX IPO drops (From Behind the Markets) (Ad)tc pixel Free FT Stock Alerts

Fortune Minerals (FT) Competitors

Fortune Minerals logo
C$0.16 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06/12/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Compare

FT vs. PML, GLO, CET, NCA, and BUI

Should you buy Fortune Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fortune Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fortune Minerals include Panoro Minerals (PML), Global Atomic (GLO), Cathedral Energy Services (CET), NewCastle Gold (NCA), and Buhler Industries (BUI). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Panoro Minerals?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and Panoro Minerals (CVE:PML) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.756067, meaning that its share price is 276% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Panoro Minerals has a beta of 3.570574, meaning that its share price is 257% more volatile than the broader market.

Panoro Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A
Panoro MineralsN/AN/A-C$1.74M-C$0.02N/A

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Panoro Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals Neutral
Panoro Minerals Neutral

Fortune Minerals presently has a consensus price target of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 281.82%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Panoro Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Panoro Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.8% of Panoro Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.3% of Panoro Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Panoro Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat Panoro Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals-13,690.93% 52.59% -5.38%
Panoro Minerals N/A -4.54%-2.62%

Summary

Fortune Minerals and Panoro Minerals tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Global Atomic?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and Global Atomic (TSE:GLO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Fortune Minerals currently has a consensus target price of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 281.82%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Global Atomic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Global Atomic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Global Atomic'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals Neutral
Global Atomic Neutral

Global Atomic has a net margin of -1,289.81% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat Global Atomic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals-13,690.93% 52.59% -5.38%
Global Atomic -1,289.81%-4.29%-2.79%

Fortune Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Global Atomic. Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Atomic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A
Global AtomicC$1.10M299.62-C$10.53M-C$0.05N/A

Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.756067, meaning that its share price is 276% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Atomic has a beta of -0.010277, meaning that its share price is 101% less volatile than the broader market.

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.0% of Global Atomic shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.2% of Global Atomic shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Global Atomic beats Fortune Minerals on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Cathedral Energy Services?

Cathedral Energy Services (TSE:CET) and Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

Cathedral Energy Services pays an annual dividend of C$0.16 per share. Fortune Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 230.3%. Cathedral Energy Services pays out 200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Fortune Minerals pays out -3,800.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Minerals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Cathedral Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fortune Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cathedral Energy Services Neutral
Fortune Minerals Neutral

Cathedral Energy Services has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat Cathedral Energy Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cathedral Energy Services3.71% 12.31% 8.07%
Fortune Minerals -13,690.93%52.59%-5.38%

Fortune Minerals has a consensus target price of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 281.82%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Cathedral Energy Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cathedral Energy Services
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Cathedral Energy Services has a beta of 2.64, suggesting that its stock price is 164% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.756067, suggesting that its stock price is 276% less volatile than the broader market.

14.1% of Cathedral Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.6% of Cathedral Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cathedral Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Minerals. Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cathedral Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cathedral Energy ServicesC$577.31M0.00C$21.42MC$0.08N/A
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A

Summary

Cathedral Energy Services beats Fortune Minerals on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to NewCastle Gold?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and NewCastle Gold (TSE:NCA) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

NewCastle Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat NewCastle Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals-13,690.93% 52.59% -5.38%
NewCastle Gold N/A N/A N/A

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A
NewCastle GoldN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Fortune Minerals currently has a consensus price target of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 281.82%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than NewCastle Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
NewCastle Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Fortune Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 230.3%. NewCastle Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.38 per share. Fortune Minerals pays out -3,800.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled NewCastle Gold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals Neutral
NewCastle Gold Neutral

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats NewCastle Gold on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Buhler Industries?

Buhler Industries (TSE:BUI) and Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

In the previous week, Buhler Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fortune Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Buhler Industries Neutral
Fortune Minerals Neutral

Fortune Minerals has a consensus price target of C$0.63, indicating a potential upside of 281.82%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Buhler Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Buhler Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 96.8% of Buhler Industries shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Buhler Industries has a beta of 0.19, indicating that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.756067, indicating that its share price is 276% less volatile than the broader market.

Buhler Industries has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat Buhler Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Buhler Industries-0.43% -1.21% -0.06%
Fortune Minerals -13,690.93%52.59%-5.38%

Buhler Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Minerals. Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Buhler Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Buhler IndustriesC$239.87M0.00-C$1.03M-C$0.04N/A
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats Buhler Industries on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fortune Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFortune MineralsOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$108.31MC$1.64BC$4.80BC$12.19B
Dividend Yield4.62%6.55%4.99%6.19%
P/E Ratio-16.5028.1723.2036.94
Price / SalesN/A50,030.876,087.0210.45
Price / Cash70.0024.6324.2882.29
Price / Book-9.175.579.064.47
Net Income-C$3.22MC$70.60MC$156.77MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-8.33%0.07%0.65%0.65%
1 Month Performance-8.33%-4.26%-3.61%-0.08%
1 Year PerformanceN/A96.79%57.49%41.90%

Fortune Minerals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FT
Fortune Minerals
1.8825 of 5 stars		C$0.17
flat		C$0.63
+281.8%		+153.8%C$108.31MN/AN/A3
PML
Panoro Minerals
N/AC$1.29
-3.0%		N/A+151.9%C$397.33MN/AN/A22
GLO
Global Atomic
N/AC$0.65
+6.6%		N/A-23.0%C$318.68MC$1.10MN/A275
CET
Cathedral Energy Services
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$216.31MC$577.31M11.256
NCA
NewCastle Gold
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$187.15MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:FT) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Is SpaceX really worth 1.78 Trillion?
With SpaceX approaching a near-$2 trillion valuation, most investors are focused on the IPO itself - but analy...
InvestPub | Sponsoredtc pixel
Hey, it's Jon Najarian. The SpaceX IPO is right around the corner. But I discovered Elon may have something BIGGER planned. Check this out before June 9th...
After being invited to the SpaceX launch headquarters in Cape Canaveral from one of Elon's top lobbyists… Hall...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
The roadshow starts Monday. This stock isn't ready.
The SpaceX roadshow kicks off June 8. Goldman Sachs, the lead underwriter, will present the full S-1 to the wo...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX is chump change compared to Elon’s $20T ‘iPhone’
Early Apple investors saw peak gains as high as 7,537% after the iPhone launched. Now, multiple insider source...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel