Go Pro

Fortune Minerals (FT) Competitors

Fortune Minerals logo
C$0.13 0.00 (-1.92%)
As of 11:28 AM Eastern

FT vs. TI, GSV, MNO, NB, and GMX

Should you buy Fortune Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Fortune Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include Titan Mining (TI), Gold Standard Ventures (GSV), Meridian Mining UK Societas (MNO), NioCorp Developments (NB), and Globex Mining Enterprises (GMX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "diversified metals & mining" industry.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Titan Mining?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and Titan Mining (TSE:TI) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Fortune Minerals presently has a consensus price target of C$0.63, indicating a potential upside of 394.12%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Titan Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Titan Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Fortune Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Titan Mining. Titan Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A
Titan MiningC$77.82M4.82-C$8.33M-C$0.14N/A

Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.544803, suggesting that its stock price is 254% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Titan Mining has a beta of -0.994185, suggesting that its stock price is 199% less volatile than the broader market.

Titan Mining has a net margin of -17.91% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat Titan Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals-13,690.93% 52.59% -5.38%
Titan Mining -17.91%-174.98%-3.50%

In the previous week, Titan Mining had 3 more articles in the media than Fortune Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Titan Mining and 0 mentions for Fortune Minerals. Titan Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Fortune Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Titan Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals Neutral
Titan Mining Positive

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.5% of Titan Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 57.3% of Titan Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Titan Mining beats Fortune Minerals on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Gold Standard Ventures?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and Gold Standard Ventures (TSE:GSV) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Fortune Minerals currently has a consensus price target of C$0.63, indicating a potential upside of 394.12%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Gold Standard Ventures.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Gold Standard Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gold Standard Ventures, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A
Gold Standard VenturesN/AN/AN/A-C$0.03N/A

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gold Standard Ventures'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals Neutral
Gold Standard Ventures Neutral

Gold Standard Ventures has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat Gold Standard Ventures' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals-13,690.93% 52.59% -5.38%
Gold Standard Ventures N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats Gold Standard Ventures on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Meridian Mining UK Societas?

Meridian Mining UK Societas (CVE:MNO) and Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and profitability.

Fortune Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Meridian Mining UK Societas. Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Meridian Mining UK Societas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Meridian Mining UK Societas-C$4.33K-35,148.07-C$46.07M-C$0.31N/A
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Meridian Mining UK Societas currently has a consensus price target of C$3.25, suggesting a potential upside of 215.53%. Fortune Minerals has a consensus price target of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 394.12%. Given Fortune Minerals' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Meridian Mining UK Societas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Meridian Mining UK Societas
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Meridian Mining UK Societas' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fortune Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Meridian Mining UK Societas Neutral
Fortune Minerals Neutral

Meridian Mining UK Societas has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat Meridian Mining UK Societas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Meridian Mining UK SocietasN/A N/A N/A
Fortune Minerals -13,690.93%52.59%-5.38%

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats Meridian Mining UK Societas on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to NioCorp Developments?

NioCorp Developments (TSE:NB) and Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, NioCorp Developments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fortune Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
NioCorp Developments Neutral
Fortune Minerals Neutral

Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NioCorp Developments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NioCorp DevelopmentsN/AN/A-C$12.66M-C$1.77N/A
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A

NioCorp Developments has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat NioCorp Developments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NioCorp DevelopmentsN/A -772.20% -45.77%
Fortune Minerals -13,690.93%52.59%-5.38%

NioCorp Developments has a beta of 0.13, indicating that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.544803, indicating that its share price is 254% less volatile than the broader market.

4.8% of NioCorp Developments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 7.0% of NioCorp Developments shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fortune Minerals has a consensus target price of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 394.12%. Given Fortune Minerals' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than NioCorp Developments.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NioCorp Developments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

NioCorp Developments beats Fortune Minerals on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Globex Mining Enterprises?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and Globex Mining Enterprises (TSE:GMX) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Fortune Minerals currently has a consensus target price of C$0.63, indicating a potential upside of 394.12%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Globex Mining Enterprises.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Globex Mining Enterprises
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Globex Mining Enterprises has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Minerals. Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Globex Mining Enterprises, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A
Globex Mining EnterprisesC$1.49M73.50C$4.51MC$0.1314.77

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Globex Mining Enterprises'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals Neutral
Globex Mining Enterprises Neutral

Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.544803, meaning that its share price is 254% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Globex Mining Enterprises has a beta of 0.480553, meaning that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Globex Mining Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.4% of Globex Mining Enterprises shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Globex Mining Enterprises has a net margin of 495.77% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat Globex Mining Enterprises' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals-13,690.93% 52.59% -5.38%
Globex Mining Enterprises 495.77%18.96%3.16%

Summary

Globex Mining Enterprises beats Fortune Minerals on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fortune Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FT vs. The Competition

MetricFortune MineralsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$83.69MC$3.77BC$4.83BC$12.53B
Dividend Yield4.62%5.22%4.71%6.20%
P/E Ratio-12.7523.4821.9030.69
Price / SalesN/A7,605.034,521.489.75
Price / Cash70.0029.7127.1382.29
Price / Book-7.0810.488.884.63
Net Income-C$3.22MC$122.18MC$154.16MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-5.56%1.31%0.93%0.75%
1 Month Performance-1.92%7.88%6.55%3.71%
1 Year PerformanceN/A56.12%44.33%35.85%

Fortune Minerals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FT
Fortune Minerals
N/AC$0.13
-1.9%
C$0.63
+394.1%
+52.9%C$83.69MN/AN/A3
TI
Titan Mining
N/AC$3.29
+1.2%
N/A+187.3%C$323.37MC$77.82MN/A142
GSV
Gold Standard Ventures
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$200.89MN/AN/A20
MNO
Meridian Mining UK Societas
N/AC$1.03
+9.6%
C$3.25
+215.5%
+0.0%C$152.09M-C$4.33KN/AN/A
NB
NioCorp Developments
0.011 of 5 stars
N/AN/AN/AC$124.34MN/AN/A7

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:FT) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners