Free Trial
→ The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free FT Stock Alerts

Fortune Minerals (FT) Competitors

Fortune Minerals logo
C$0.16 +0.01 (+8.62%)
As of 03:37 PM Eastern
Compare

FT vs. PML, CET, NCA, NIM, and BUI

Should you be buying Fortune Minerals stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Fortune Minerals include Panoro Minerals (PML), Cathedral Energy Services (CET), NewCastle Gold (NCA), Nicola Mining (NIM), and Buhler Industries (BUI). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Panoro Minerals?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and Panoro Minerals (CVE:PML) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, Panoro Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Fortune Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Panoro Minerals and 1 mentions for Fortune Minerals. Panoro Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Fortune Minerals' score of 0.13 indicating that Panoro Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Panoro Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Panoro Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 40.99% beat Panoro Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals-13,690.93% 40.99% -5.38%
Panoro Minerals N/A -4.54%-2.62%

Panoro Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A
Panoro MineralsN/AN/A-C$1.74M-C$0.01N/A

Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.588719, meaning that its share price is 259% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Panoro Minerals has a beta of 3.202421, meaning that its share price is 220% more volatile than the S&P 500.

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Panoro Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.3% of Panoro Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Panoro Minerals beats Fortune Minerals on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Cathedral Energy Services?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and Cathedral Energy Services (TSE:CET) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Cathedral Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fortune Minerals and 0 mentions for Cathedral Energy Services. Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.13 beat Cathedral Energy Services' score of 0.00 indicating that Fortune Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals Neutral
Cathedral Energy Services Neutral

Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.588719, meaning that its stock price is 259% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cathedral Energy Services has a beta of 2.64, meaning that its stock price is 164% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Cathedral Energy Services has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 40.99% beat Cathedral Energy Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals-13,690.93% 40.99% -5.38%
Cathedral Energy Services 3.71%12.31%8.07%

Cathedral Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Minerals. Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cathedral Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A
Cathedral Energy ServicesC$577.31M0.00C$21.42MC$0.08N/A

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.1% of Cathedral Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 21.6% of Cathedral Energy Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fortune Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 241.3%. Cathedral Energy Services pays an annual dividend of C$0.16 per share. Fortune Minerals pays out -3,800.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cathedral Energy Services pays out 200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Fortune Minerals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Cathedral Energy Services beats Fortune Minerals on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to NewCastle Gold?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and NewCastle Gold (TSE:NCA) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than NewCastle Gold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fortune Minerals and 0 mentions for NewCastle Gold. Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.13 beat NewCastle Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that Fortune Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals Neutral
NewCastle Gold Neutral

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A
NewCastle GoldN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

NewCastle Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 40.99% beat NewCastle Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals-13,690.93% 40.99% -5.38%
NewCastle Gold N/A N/A N/A

Fortune Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 241.3%. NewCastle Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.38 per share. Fortune Minerals pays out -3,800.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats NewCastle Gold on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Nicola Mining?

Nicola Mining (CVE:NIM) and Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and risk.

4.9% of Nicola Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.6% of Nicola Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Nicola Mining has a beta of 0.322428, indicating that its share price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.588719, indicating that its share price is 259% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nicola Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Nicola Mining had 3 more articles in the media than Fortune Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Nicola Mining and 1 mentions for Fortune Minerals. Nicola Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Fortune Minerals' score of 0.13 indicating that Nicola Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Nicola Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fortune Minerals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Fortune Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nicola Mining. Nicola Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nicola MiningC$1.54M118.12-C$7.30M-C$0.03N/A
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A

Nicola Mining has a net margin of -359.90% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Nicola Mining's return on equity of 95.95% beat Fortune Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nicola Mining-359.90% 95.95% -18.29%
Fortune Minerals -13,690.93%40.99%-5.38%

Nicola Mining pays an annual dividend of C$0.31 per share and has a dividend yield of 39.2%. Fortune Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 241.3%. Nicola Mining pays out -1,033.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Minerals pays out -3,800.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fortune Minerals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Nicola Mining beats Fortune Minerals on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Buhler Industries?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and Buhler Industries (TSE:BUI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

Buhler Industries has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 40.99% beat Buhler Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals-13,690.93% 40.99% -5.38%
Buhler Industries -0.43%-1.21%-0.06%

Buhler Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Minerals. Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Buhler Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A
Buhler IndustriesC$239.87M0.00-C$1.03M-C$0.04N/A

Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.588719, meaning that its share price is 259% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Buhler Industries has a beta of 0.19, meaning that its share price is 81% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Buhler Industries. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fortune Minerals and 0 mentions for Buhler Industries. Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.13 beat Buhler Industries' score of 0.00 indicating that Fortune Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals Neutral
Buhler Industries Neutral

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 96.8% of Buhler Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Fortune Minerals and Buhler Industries tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fortune Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFortune MineralsOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$92.13MC$1.50BC$4.72BC$11.72B
Dividend Yield4.62%6.56%4.98%6.22%
P/E Ratio-15.7525.4120.9723.83
Price / SalesN/A61,459.687,339.1413.46
Price / Cash70.0024.6324.3582.69
Price / Book-9.329.697.704.48
Net Income-C$3.22MC$70.60MC$159.29MC$300.68M
7 Day Performance-7.35%-0.46%0.00%0.12%
1 Month Performance43.18%4.31%2.58%2.88%
1 Year PerformanceN/A110.50%76.07%57.78%

Fortune Minerals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FT
Fortune Minerals
N/AC$0.16
+8.6%		N/AN/AC$92.13MN/AN/A3
PML
Panoro Minerals
N/AC$1.06
+5.0%		N/AN/AC$287.01MN/AN/A22
CET
Cathedral Energy Services
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$216.31MC$577.31M11.256
NCA
NewCastle Gold
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$187.15MN/AN/AN/A
NIM
Nicola Mining
0.0231 of 5 stars		C$0.81
+3.8%		N/AN/AC$184.21MC$1.54MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:FT) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Iran's New Leader Just Said Something That Should Terrify Every American
Iran's Supreme Leader has declared the Strait of Hormuz closed as leverage against the U.S. - and with 40% of ...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
My feud with Zohran Mamdani
Emmy-winning analyst releases his next big story Whitney Tilson shocked the nation on 60 Minutes when he ac...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $1.75T "Backdoor" ticker (NOT Starlink)
When the SpaceX IPO launches, most investors will already be too late. The real opportunity isn't the IPO itse...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Sell 99% of Your Stocks, Do THIS Instead…
Millionaire Trader Exposes: "The Single Stock Income Plan" With over 6,000 stocks on the market to choose ...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trade this between 9:30 and 10:45 am EST
The first 75 minutes of the trading day may be the most overlooked window for consistent opportunities.If you ...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon Unveils AI Passive Income Stream for Millions of Americans
During Tesla's last earnings call, Elon Musk outlined a new AI-driven approach he says could generate $30,000-...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel