Go Pro
→ The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free FT Stock Alerts

Fortune Minerals (FT) Competitors

Fortune Minerals logo
C$0.12 +0.01 (+4.17%)
As of 07/24/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Compare

FT vs. GLO, CET, NCA, BUI, and AVK

Should you buy Fortune Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fortune Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fortune Minerals include Global Atomic (GLO), Cathedral Energy Services (CET), NewCastle Gold (NCA), Buhler Industries (BUI), and Avnel Gold Mining (AVK). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Global Atomic?

Global Atomic (TSE:GLO) and Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Fortune Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Global Atomic. Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Atomic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global AtomicC$1.10M254.90-C$10.53M-C$0.05N/A
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A

Global Atomic has a beta of -0.000641, meaning that its stock price is 100% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.529359, meaning that its stock price is 253% less volatile than the broader market.

13.8% of Global Atomic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Global Atomic shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Global Atomic has a net margin of -1,289.81% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat Global Atomic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Atomic-1,289.81% -4.29% -2.79%
Fortune Minerals -13,690.93%52.59%-5.38%

Fortune Minerals has a consensus target price of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 404.00%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Global Atomic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Global Atomic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Global Atomic. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fortune Minerals and 0 mentions for Global Atomic. Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Global Atomic's score of 0.00 indicating that Fortune Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Global Atomic Neutral
Fortune Minerals Positive

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats Global Atomic on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Cathedral Energy Services?

Cathedral Energy Services (TSE:CET) and Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Cathedral Energy Services pays an annual dividend of C$0.16 per share. Fortune Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 304.0%. Cathedral Energy Services pays out 200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Fortune Minerals pays out -3,800.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Minerals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Cathedral Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Minerals. Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cathedral Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cathedral Energy ServicesC$577.31M0.00C$21.42MC$0.08N/A
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A

14.1% of Cathedral Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.6% of Cathedral Energy Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cathedral Energy Services has a beta of 2.64, indicating that its share price is 164% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.529359, indicating that its share price is 253% less volatile than the broader market.

Cathedral Energy Services has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat Cathedral Energy Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cathedral Energy Services3.71% 12.31% 8.07%
Fortune Minerals -13,690.93%52.59%-5.38%

Fortune Minerals has a consensus target price of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 404.00%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Cathedral Energy Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cathedral Energy Services
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Cathedral Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fortune Minerals and 0 mentions for Cathedral Energy Services. Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Cathedral Energy Services' score of 0.00 indicating that Fortune Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cathedral Energy Services Neutral
Fortune Minerals Positive

Summary

Cathedral Energy Services beats Fortune Minerals on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to NewCastle Gold?

NewCastle Gold (TSE:NCA) and Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than NewCastle Gold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fortune Minerals and 0 mentions for NewCastle Gold. Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat NewCastle Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that Fortune Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
NewCastle Gold Neutral
Fortune Minerals Positive

NewCastle Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.38 per share. Fortune Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 304.0%. Fortune Minerals pays out -3,800.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NewCastle GoldN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A

NewCastle Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat NewCastle Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NewCastle GoldN/A N/A N/A
Fortune Minerals -13,690.93%52.59%-5.38%

Fortune Minerals has a consensus target price of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 404.00%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than NewCastle Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NewCastle Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats NewCastle Gold on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Buhler Industries?

Buhler Industries (TSE:BUI) and Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Buhler Industries. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fortune Minerals and 0 mentions for Buhler Industries. Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Buhler Industries' score of 0.00 indicating that Fortune Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Buhler Industries Neutral
Fortune Minerals Positive

Buhler Industries has a beta of 0.19, suggesting that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.529359, suggesting that its share price is 253% less volatile than the broader market.

Buhler Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Minerals. Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Buhler Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Buhler IndustriesC$239.87M0.00-C$1.03M-C$0.04N/A
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 96.8% of Buhler Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fortune Minerals has a consensus target price of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 404.00%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Buhler Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Buhler Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Buhler Industries has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat Buhler Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Buhler Industries-0.43% -1.21% -0.06%
Fortune Minerals -13,690.93%52.59%-5.38%

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats Buhler Industries on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Avnel Gold Mining?

Avnel Gold Mining (TSE:AVK) and Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fortune Minerals has a consensus price target of C$0.63, indicating a potential upside of 404.00%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Avnel Gold Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Avnel Gold Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Avnel Gold Mining has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat Avnel Gold Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Avnel Gold MiningN/A N/A N/A
Fortune Minerals -13,690.93%52.59%-5.38%

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Avnel Gold Mining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fortune Minerals and 0 mentions for Avnel Gold Mining. Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Avnel Gold Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Fortune Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Avnel Gold Mining Neutral
Fortune Minerals Positive

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Avnel Gold MiningN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats Avnel Gold Mining on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fortune Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFortune MineralsOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$78.77MC$1.49BC$4.56BC$12.48B
Dividend Yield4.62%6.57%5.02%6.19%
P/E Ratio-12.5017.9220.9536.95
Price / SalesN/A47,533.055,752.369.44
Price / Cash70.0024.6326.3382.29
Price / Book-6.945.418.574.39
Net Income-C$3.22MC$70.60MC$157.08MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance2.04%0.65%1.24%0.61%
1 Month Performance-10.71%-4.06%-1.23%1.06%
1 Year PerformanceN/A60.10%35.93%30.89%

Fortune Minerals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FT
Fortune Minerals
2.6928 of 5 stars		C$0.13
+4.2%		C$0.63
+404.0%		+38.9%C$78.77MN/AN/A3
GLO
Global Atomic
N/AC$0.57
flat		N/A-27.8%C$279.46MC$1.10MN/A275
CET
Cathedral Energy Services
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$216.31MC$577.31M11.256
NCA
NewCastle Gold
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$187.15MN/AN/AN/A
BUI
Buhler Industries
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$182.25MC$239.87MN/A862

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:FT) was last updated on 7/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
BofA: Digital Dollar Coming 2025-2030
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon's new "super startup"
Adam O'Dell - the analyst who recommended Palantir before it became the top S&P 500 performer - has identified...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel