Go Pro
→ Read now. Do not delete. You’ve been warned. (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free FT Stock Alerts

Fortune Minerals (FT) Competitors

Fortune Minerals logo
C$0.16 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/3/2026 03:37 PM Eastern
Compare

FT vs. GLO, CET, NCA, BUI, and AVK

Should you buy Fortune Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fortune Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fortune Minerals include Global Atomic (GLO), Cathedral Energy Services (CET), NewCastle Gold (NCA), Buhler Industries (BUI), and Avnel Gold Mining (AVK). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Global Atomic?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and Global Atomic (TSE:GLO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and earnings.

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.0% of Global Atomic shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.2% of Global Atomic shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Global Atomic had 1 more articles in the media than Fortune Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Global Atomic and 0 mentions for Fortune Minerals. Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Global Atomic'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals Neutral
Global Atomic Neutral

Fortune Minerals presently has a consensus target price of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 300.00%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Global Atomic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Global Atomic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Global Atomic has a net margin of -1,289.81% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat Global Atomic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals-13,690.93% 52.59% -5.38%
Global Atomic -1,289.81%-4.29%-2.79%

Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.756067, suggesting that its share price is 276% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Atomic has a beta of -0.000641, suggesting that its share price is 100% less volatile than the broader market.

Fortune Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Global Atomic. Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Atomic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A
Global AtomicC$1.10M286.21-C$10.53M-C$0.05N/A

Summary

Global Atomic beats Fortune Minerals on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Cathedral Energy Services?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and Cathedral Energy Services (TSE:CET) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Cathedral Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Minerals. Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cathedral Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A
Cathedral Energy ServicesC$577.31M0.00C$21.42MC$0.08N/A

Fortune Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 241.3%. Cathedral Energy Services pays an annual dividend of C$0.16 per share. Fortune Minerals pays out -3,800.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cathedral Energy Services pays out 200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Fortune Minerals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Fortune Minerals currently has a consensus target price of C$0.63, indicating a potential upside of 300.00%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Cathedral Energy Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Cathedral Energy Services
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.756067, meaning that its stock price is 276% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cathedral Energy Services has a beta of 2.64, meaning that its stock price is 164% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cathedral Energy Services'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals Neutral
Cathedral Energy Services Neutral

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.1% of Cathedral Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 21.6% of Cathedral Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cathedral Energy Services has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat Cathedral Energy Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals-13,690.93% 52.59% -5.38%
Cathedral Energy Services 3.71%12.31%8.07%

Summary

Cathedral Energy Services beats Fortune Minerals on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to NewCastle Gold?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and NewCastle Gold (TSE:NCA) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled NewCastle Gold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals Neutral
NewCastle Gold Neutral

NewCastle Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat NewCastle Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals-13,690.93% 52.59% -5.38%
NewCastle Gold N/A N/A N/A

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fortune Minerals presently has a consensus target price of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 300.00%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than NewCastle Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
NewCastle Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A
NewCastle GoldN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Fortune Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 241.3%. NewCastle Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.38 per share. Fortune Minerals pays out -3,800.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats NewCastle Gold on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Buhler Industries?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and Buhler Industries (TSE:BUI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Buhler Industries has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat Buhler Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals-13,690.93% 52.59% -5.38%
Buhler Industries -0.43%-1.21%-0.06%

Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.756067, suggesting that its share price is 276% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Buhler Industries has a beta of 0.19, suggesting that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 96.8% of Buhler Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Buhler Industries'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals Neutral
Buhler Industries Neutral

Fortune Minerals presently has a consensus target price of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 300.00%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Buhler Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Buhler Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Buhler Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Minerals. Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Buhler Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A
Buhler IndustriesC$239.87M0.00-C$1.03M-C$0.04N/A

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats Buhler Industries on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Avnel Gold Mining?

Avnel Gold Mining (TSE:AVK) and Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Avnel Gold Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fortune Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Avnel Gold Mining Neutral
Fortune Minerals Neutral

Fortune Minerals has a consensus price target of C$0.63, indicating a potential upside of 300.00%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Avnel Gold Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Avnel Gold Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Avnel Gold Mining has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat Avnel Gold Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Avnel Gold MiningN/A N/A N/A
Fortune Minerals -13,690.93%52.59%-5.38%

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Avnel Gold MiningN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats Avnel Gold Mining on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fortune Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFortune MineralsOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$103.38MC$1.52BC$4.68BC$13.07B
Dividend Yield4.62%6.57%5.02%6.18%
P/E Ratio-15.7518.6421.4736.51
Price / SalesN/A52,694.006,344.5210.34
Price / Cash70.0024.6326.8182.29
Price / Book-8.755.588.784.52
Net Income-C$3.22MC$70.60MC$157.26MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance5.00%1.46%1.40%1.85%
1 Month Performance-10.00%-3.67%-1.84%1.71%
1 Year Performance50.00%78.73%46.42%36.40%

Fortune Minerals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FT
Fortune Minerals
1.9346 of 5 stars		C$0.16
flat		C$0.63
+300.0%		+50.0%C$103.38MN/AN/A3
GLO
Global Atomic
N/AC$0.65
-4.4%		N/A-13.5%C$318.68MC$1.10MN/A275
CET
Cathedral Energy Services
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$216.31MC$577.31M11.256
NCA
NewCastle Gold
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$187.15MN/AN/AN/A
BUI
Buhler Industries
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$182.25MC$239.87MN/A862

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:FT) was last updated on 7/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Do NOT Buy SpaceX – Do This Instead
SpaceX just went public - and Whitney Tilson, Harvard MBA and 30-year Wall Street veteran, says buying in coul...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump just signed it
A recent policy development is drawing attention from income-focused investors. According to one analyst, c...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
From the man who predicted 2008 crash…
Porter Stansberry, founder of one of the largest financial research firms in the world, says he's breaking the...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Better than SpaceX? Grab this ticker instead.
Larry Benedict generated $274 million for his clients by finding the trades most investors missed. Now he says...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel