Fortune Minerals (FT) Competitors

C$0.24 +0.03 (+14.29%)

As of 03:59 PM Eastern

FT vs. PML, GLO, CET, NCA, and NIM

Should you buy Fortune Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fortune Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fortune Minerals include Panoro Minerals (PML), Global Atomic (GLO), Cathedral Energy Services (CET), NewCastle Gold (NCA), and Nicola Mining (NIM). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Panoro Minerals?

Panoro Minerals (CVE:PML) and Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Panoro Minerals and Panoro Minerals both had 1 articles in the media. Panoro Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Fortune Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Panoro Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Panoro Minerals	Positive
Fortune Minerals	Neutral

Fortune Minerals has a consensus price target of C$0.63, indicating a potential upside of 162.50%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Panoro Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Panoro Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Fortune Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Panoro Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Panoro Minerals	N/A	N/A	-C$1.74M	-C$0.01	N/A
Fortune Minerals	N/A	N/A	-C$3.22M	-C$0.01	N/A

Panoro Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat Panoro Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Panoro Minerals	N/A	-4.54%	-2.62%
Fortune Minerals	-13,690.93%	52.59%	-5.38%

Panoro Minerals has a beta of 3.202421, suggesting that its stock price is 220% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.694157, suggesting that its stock price is 269% less volatile than the broader market.

0.4% of Panoro Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.3% of Panoro Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Panoro Minerals beats Fortune Minerals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Global Atomic?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and Global Atomic (TSE:GLO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation and media sentiment.

Global Atomic has a net margin of -1,289.81% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat Global Atomic's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals	-13,690.93%	52.59%	-5.38%
Global Atomic	-1,289.81%	-4.29%	-2.79%

Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.694157, meaning that its stock price is 269% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Atomic has a beta of 0.060007, meaning that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market.

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.4% of Global Atomic shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.2% of Global Atomic shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fortune Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Global Atomic. Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Atomic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Minerals	N/A	N/A	-C$3.22M	-C$0.01	N/A
Global Atomic	C$1.10M	308.57	-C$10.53M	-C$0.05	N/A

Fortune Minerals currently has a consensus target price of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 162.50%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Global Atomic.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fortune Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Global Atomic	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Global Atomic. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fortune Minerals and 0 mentions for Global Atomic. Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Global Atomic'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals	Neutral
Global Atomic	Neutral

Summary

Fortune Minerals and Global Atomic tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Cathedral Energy Services?

Cathedral Energy Services (TSE:CET) and Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Cathedral Energy Services has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat Cathedral Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cathedral Energy Services	3.71%	12.31%	8.07%
Fortune Minerals	-13,690.93%	52.59%	-5.38%

Cathedral Energy Services has a beta of 2.64, meaning that its stock price is 164% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.694157, meaning that its stock price is 269% less volatile than the broader market.

Cathedral Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Minerals. Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cathedral Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cathedral Energy Services	C$577.31M	0.00	C$21.42M	C$0.08	N/A
Fortune Minerals	N/A	N/A	-C$3.22M	-C$0.01	N/A

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Cathedral Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fortune Minerals and 0 mentions for Cathedral Energy Services. Cathedral Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fortune Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Cathedral Energy Services	Neutral
Fortune Minerals	Neutral

14.1% of Cathedral Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.6% of Cathedral Energy Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cathedral Energy Services pays an annual dividend of C$0.16 per share. Fortune Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 158.3%. Cathedral Energy Services pays out 200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Fortune Minerals pays out -3,800.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Minerals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Fortune Minerals has a consensus price target of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 162.50%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Cathedral Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cathedral Energy Services	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Fortune Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Cathedral Energy Services beats Fortune Minerals on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to NewCastle Gold?

NewCastle Gold (TSE:NCA) and Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Fortune Minerals has a consensus target price of C$0.63, indicating a potential upside of 162.50%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than NewCastle Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NewCastle Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Fortune Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

NewCastle Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 52.59% beat NewCastle Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NewCastle Gold	N/A	N/A	N/A
Fortune Minerals	-13,690.93%	52.59%	-5.38%

NewCastle Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.38 per share. Fortune Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 158.3%. Fortune Minerals pays out -3,800.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NewCastle Gold	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Fortune Minerals	N/A	N/A	-C$3.22M	-C$0.01	N/A

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than NewCastle Gold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fortune Minerals and 0 mentions for NewCastle Gold. NewCastle Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fortune Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
NewCastle Gold	Neutral
Fortune Minerals	Neutral

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats NewCastle Gold on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Nicola Mining?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and Nicola Mining (CVE:NIM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Fortune Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Nicola Mining. Nicola Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Minerals	N/A	N/A	-C$3.22M	-C$0.01	N/A
Nicola Mining	C$3.03M	60.58	-C$7.30M	-C$0.03	N/A

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Nicola Mining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fortune Minerals and 0 mentions for Nicola Mining. Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Nicola Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals	Neutral
Nicola Mining	Neutral

Fortune Minerals presently has a consensus price target of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 162.50%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Nicola Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fortune Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Nicola Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Fortune Minerals has a beta of -1.694157, meaning that its share price is 269% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nicola Mining has a beta of 0.140924, meaning that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.9% of Nicola Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 21.6% of Nicola Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fortune Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 158.3%. Nicola Mining pays an annual dividend of C$0.31 per share and has a dividend yield of 38.8%. Fortune Minerals pays out -3,800.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nicola Mining pays out -1,033.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fortune Minerals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Nicola Mining has a net margin of -200.06% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Nicola Mining's return on equity of 177.66% beat Fortune Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals	-13,690.93%	52.59%	-5.38%
Nicola Mining	-200.06%	177.66%	-18.29%

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats Nicola Mining on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fortune Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Fortune Minerals	Other Industrial Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$157.54M	C$1.60B	C$4.80B	C$12.16B
Dividend Yield	4.62%	6.56%	5.01%	6.20%
P/E Ratio	-24.00	30.29	23.12	37.64
Price / Sales	N/A	57,253.92	6,750.54	11.68
Price / Cash	70.00	24.63	27.21	82.29
Price / Book	-13.33	5.98	6.73	4.50
Net Income	-C$3.22M	C$70.60M	C$157.11M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	33.33%	-0.28%	-0.51%	1.38%
1 Month Performance	100.00%	1.13%	-0.41%	1.46%
1 Year Performance	N/A	119.58%	74.77%	55.45%

Fortune Minerals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FT Fortune Minerals	1.8844 of 5 stars	C$0.24 +14.3%	C$0.63 +162.5%	+250.0%	C$157.54M	N/A	N/A	3	Analyst Forecast
PML Panoro Minerals	N/A	C$1.23 +0.8%	N/A	+172.3%	C$378.12M	N/A	N/A	22
GLO Global Atomic	N/A	C$0.68 flat	N/A	-26.4%	C$333.39M	C$1.10M	N/A	275	Gap Up
CET Cathedral Energy Services	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$216.31M	C$577.31M	11.25	6
NCA NewCastle Gold	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$187.15M	N/A	N/A	N/A	Gap Up High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:FT) was last updated on 5/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Fortune Minerals (FT) Competitors

FT vs. PML, GLO, CET, NCA, and NIM

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Panoro Minerals?

Summary

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Global Atomic?

Summary

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Cathedral Energy Services?

Summary

How does Fortune Minerals compare to NewCastle Gold?

Summary

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Nicola Mining?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FT vs. The Competition

Fortune Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Fortune Minerals (FT) Competitors

FT vs. PML, GLO, CET, NCA, and NIM

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Panoro Minerals?

Does the media refer more to PML or FT?

Do analysts rate PML or FT?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, PML or FT?

Is PML or FT more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, PML or FT?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PML or FT?

Summary

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Global Atomic?

Is FT or GLO more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, FT or GLO?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of FT or GLO?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, FT or GLO?

Do analysts recommend FT or GLO?

Does the media prefer FT or GLO?

Summary

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Cathedral Energy Services?

Is CET or FT more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, CET or FT?

Which has better earnings & valuation, CET or FT?

Does the media refer more to CET or FT?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in CET or FT?

Is CET or FT a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate CET or FT?

Summary

How does Fortune Minerals compare to NewCastle Gold?

Do analysts prefer NCA or FT?

Is NCA or FT more profitable?

Is NCA or FT a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, NCA or FT?

Does the media prefer NCA or FT?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in NCA or FT?

Summary

How does Fortune Minerals compare to Nicola Mining?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, FT or NIM?

Does the media prefer FT or NIM?

Do analysts prefer FT or NIM?

Which has more volatility and risk, FT or NIM?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in FT or NIM?

Is FT or NIM a better dividend stock?

Is FT or NIM more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FT vs. The Competition

Fortune Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools