Intermap Technologies (IMP) Competitors

C$1.88 -0.12 (-6.00%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

IMP vs. NOA, PHX, CEI, GTE, and MPC

Should you buy Intermap Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Intermap Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Intermap Technologies include North American Construction Group (NOA), PHX Energy Services (PHX), Coelacanth Energy (CEI), Gran Tierra Energy (GTE), and Madison Pacific Properties (MPC). These companies are all part of the "petroleum and natural gas" industry.

How does Intermap Technologies compare to North American Construction Group?

North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) and Intermap Technologies (TSE:IMP) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability and risk.

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Intermap Technologies' net margin of -63.50%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.88% beat Intermap Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
North American Construction Group	2.63%	7.88%	6.65%
Intermap Technologies	-63.50%	-38.48%	-20.25%

North American Construction Group has a beta of 0.861491, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intermap Technologies has a beta of 0.330525, indicating that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Intermap Technologies. Intermap Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction Group	C$1.28B	0.48	C$56.80M	C$1.14	18.96
Intermap Technologies	C$10.57M	12.88	-C$120.05K	-C$0.11	N/A

In the previous week, North American Construction Group and North American Construction Group both had 3 articles in the media. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Intermap Technologies' score of -0.07 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group	Positive
Intermap Technologies	Neutral

24.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.6% of Intermap Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.0% of Intermap Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

North American Construction Group presently has a consensus target price of C$22.71, indicating a potential upside of 5.06%. Given North American Construction Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Intermap Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Intermap Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Intermap Technologies on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intermap Technologies compare to PHX Energy Services?

PHX Energy Services (TSE:PHX) and Intermap Technologies (TSE:IMP) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability and risk.

PHX Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Intermap Technologies. Intermap Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHX Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PHX Energy Services	C$699.78M	0.73	C$72.75M	C$0.89	12.73
Intermap Technologies	C$10.57M	12.88	-C$120.05K	-C$0.11	N/A

In the previous week, PHX Energy Services had 5 more articles in the media than Intermap Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for PHX Energy Services and 3 mentions for Intermap Technologies. Intermap Technologies' average media sentiment score of -0.07 beat PHX Energy Services' score of -1.51 indicating that Intermap Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
PHX Energy Services	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Negative
Intermap Technologies	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

PHX Energy Services has a beta of 1.349647, indicating that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intermap Technologies has a beta of 0.330525, indicating that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

PHX Energy Services presently has a consensus target price of C$11.13, indicating a potential downside of 1.81%. Given PHX Energy Services' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PHX Energy Services is more favorable than Intermap Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PHX Energy Services	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Intermap Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00

PHX Energy Services has a net margin of 6.21% compared to Intermap Technologies' net margin of -63.50%. PHX Energy Services' return on equity of 19.38% beat Intermap Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PHX Energy Services	6.21%	19.38%	10.65%
Intermap Technologies	-63.50%	-38.48%	-20.25%

15.7% of PHX Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.6% of Intermap Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 11.9% of PHX Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.0% of Intermap Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

PHX Energy Services beats Intermap Technologies on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intermap Technologies compare to Coelacanth Energy?

Intermap Technologies (TSE:IMP) and Coelacanth Energy (CVE:CEI) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and valuation.

Intermap Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Coelacanth Energy. Coelacanth Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intermap Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Intermap Technologies	C$10.57M	12.88	-C$120.05K	-C$0.11	N/A
Coelacanth Energy	C$30.47M	17.05	-C$6.75M	-C$0.02	N/A

In the previous week, Intermap Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Coelacanth Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Intermap Technologies and 0 mentions for Coelacanth Energy. Coelacanth Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Intermap Technologies' score of -0.07 indicating that Coelacanth Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Intermap Technologies	Neutral
Coelacanth Energy	Neutral

Intermap Technologies has a beta of 0.330525, indicating that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Coelacanth Energy has a beta of 0.309113, indicating that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

Coelacanth Energy has a consensus target price of C$1.10, indicating a potential upside of 34.15%. Given Coelacanth Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Coelacanth Energy is more favorable than Intermap Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Intermap Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00
Coelacanth Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00

Coelacanth Energy has a net margin of -36.19% compared to Intermap Technologies' net margin of -63.50%. Coelacanth Energy's return on equity of -6.74% beat Intermap Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Intermap Technologies	-63.50%	-38.48%	-20.25%
Coelacanth Energy	-36.19%	-6.74%	-3.98%

3.6% of Intermap Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.0% of Coelacanth Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.0% of Intermap Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 31.6% of Coelacanth Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Coelacanth Energy beats Intermap Technologies on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intermap Technologies compare to Gran Tierra Energy?

Intermap Technologies (TSE:IMP) and Gran Tierra Energy (TSE:GTE) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and valuation.

Gran Tierra Energy has a net margin of -48.52% compared to Intermap Technologies' net margin of -63.50%. Intermap Technologies' return on equity of -38.48% beat Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Intermap Technologies	-63.50%	-38.48%	-20.25%
Gran Tierra Energy	-48.52%	-107.11%	8.16%

Gran Tierra Energy has a consensus target price of C$11.83, indicating a potential downside of 4.57%. Given Gran Tierra Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gran Tierra Energy is more favorable than Intermap Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Intermap Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00
Gran Tierra Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Gran Tierra Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Intermap Technologies. Intermap Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gran Tierra Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Intermap Technologies	C$10.57M	12.88	-C$120.05K	-C$0.11	N/A
Gran Tierra Energy	C$600.60M	0.73	C$37.65M	-C$8.29	N/A

3.6% of Intermap Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.0% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.0% of Intermap Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Intermap Technologies has a beta of 0.330525, indicating that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 0.195446, indicating that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Intermap Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Gran Tierra Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Intermap Technologies and 2 mentions for Gran Tierra Energy. Gran Tierra Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Intermap Technologies' score of -0.07 indicating that Gran Tierra Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Intermap Technologies	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Gran Tierra Energy	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Gran Tierra Energy beats Intermap Technologies on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intermap Technologies compare to Madison Pacific Properties?

Madison Pacific Properties (TSE:MPC) and Intermap Technologies (TSE:IMP) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and risk.

Madison Pacific Properties has a net margin of 57.06% compared to Intermap Technologies' net margin of -63.50%. Madison Pacific Properties' return on equity of 6.33% beat Intermap Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Madison Pacific Properties	57.06%	6.33%	1.63%
Intermap Technologies	-63.50%	-38.48%	-20.25%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Madison Pacific Properties	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Intermap Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00

Intermap Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Madison Pacific Properties. Intermap Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Madison Pacific Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Madison Pacific Properties	C$45.82M	6.88	-C$41.81M	C$0.44	12.05
Intermap Technologies	C$10.57M	12.88	-C$120.05K	-C$0.11	N/A

0.0% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.6% of Intermap Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 75.1% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.0% of Intermap Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Madison Pacific Properties has a beta of 0.290764, indicating that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intermap Technologies has a beta of 0.330525, indicating that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Intermap Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Madison Pacific Properties. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Intermap Technologies and 0 mentions for Madison Pacific Properties. Madison Pacific Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Intermap Technologies' score of -0.07 indicating that Madison Pacific Properties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Madison Pacific Properties	Neutral
Intermap Technologies	Neutral

Summary

Madison Pacific Properties beats Intermap Technologies on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Intermap Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IMP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

IMP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Intermap Technologies	Software Industry	Computer Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$136.18M	C$4.68B	C$39.48B	C$11.97B
Dividend Yield	1.80%	3.97%	3.20%	6.22%
P/E Ratio	-17.09	26.23	163.78	36.97
Price / Sales	12.88	254.54	623.80	12.07
Price / Cash	275.00	17.18	47.82	82.42
Price / Book	4.73	4.19	9.56	4.62
Net Income	-C$120.05K	C$22.26M	C$1.03B	C$299.62M
7 Day Performance	-7.84%	-1.93%	0.39%	0.84%
1 Month Performance	-1.57%	2.98%	9.60%	1.26%
1 Year Performance	-23.27%	-8.41%	164.82%	58.29%

Intermap Technologies Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
IMP Intermap Technologies	0.0209 of 5 stars	C$1.88 -6.0%	N/A	-19.0%	C$136.18M	C$10.57M	N/A	5,300	News Coverage Earnings Report Gap Down
NOA North American Construction Group	2.8219 of 5 stars	C$20.07 +1.4%	C$22.43 +11.8%	-13.4%	C$570.29M	C$1.28B	17.61	200	Positive News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast
PHX PHX Energy Services	1.3541 of 5 stars	C$11.20 -2.8%	C$11.13 -0.7%	+40.0%	C$508.12M	C$709.60M	9.91	20	Negative News Insider Trade
CEI Coelacanth Energy	N/A	C$0.83 flat	C$1.10 +32.5%	+0.0%	C$444.97M	C$30.47M	N/A	9
GTE Gran Tierra Energy	1.3515 of 5 stars	C$12.42 +4.2%	C$11.83 -4.7%	+67.3%	C$438.41M	C$596.71M	N/A	340	News Coverage Earnings Report Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:IMP) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Intermap Technologies (IMP) Competitors

IMP vs. NOA, PHX, CEI, GTE, and MPC

How does Intermap Technologies compare to North American Construction Group?

Summary

How does Intermap Technologies compare to PHX Energy Services?

Summary

How does Intermap Technologies compare to Coelacanth Energy?

Summary

How does Intermap Technologies compare to Gran Tierra Energy?

Summary

How does Intermap Technologies compare to Madison Pacific Properties?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

IMP vs. The Competition

Intermap Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Intermap Technologies (IMP) Competitors

IMP vs. NOA, PHX, CEI, GTE, and MPC

How does Intermap Technologies compare to North American Construction Group?

Is NOA or IMP more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, NOA or IMP?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, NOA or IMP?

Does the media favor NOA or IMP?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in NOA or IMP?

Do analysts prefer NOA or IMP?

Summary

How does Intermap Technologies compare to PHX Energy Services?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, PHX or IMP?

Does the media favor PHX or IMP?

Which has more volatility and risk, PHX or IMP?

Do analysts prefer PHX or IMP?

Is PHX or IMP more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in PHX or IMP?

Summary

How does Intermap Technologies compare to Coelacanth Energy?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, IMP or CEI?

Does the media refer more to IMP or CEI?

Which has more volatility and risk, IMP or CEI?

Do analysts recommend IMP or CEI?

Is IMP or CEI more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in IMP or CEI?

Summary

How does Intermap Technologies compare to Gran Tierra Energy?

Is IMP or GTE more profitable?

Do analysts recommend IMP or GTE?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, IMP or GTE?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in IMP or GTE?

Which has more volatility and risk, IMP or GTE?

Does the media refer more to IMP or GTE?

Summary

How does Intermap Technologies compare to Madison Pacific Properties?

Is MPC or IMP more profitable?

Do analysts prefer MPC or IMP?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, MPC or IMP?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MPC or IMP?

Which has more risk and volatility, MPC or IMP?

Does the media refer more to MPC or IMP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

IMP vs. The Competition

Intermap Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools