Go Pro

Intermap Technologies (IMP) Competitors

Intermap Technologies logo
C$1.02 -0.02 (-1.92%)
As of 07/13/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

IMP vs. MPC, HME, HAL, E, and IPT

Should you buy Intermap Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Intermap Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Intermap Technologies include Madison Pacific Properties (MPC), Hemisphere Energy (HME), Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common (HAL), Enterprise Group (E), and IMPACT Silver (IPT). These companies are all part of the "petroleum and natural gas" industry.

How does Intermap Technologies compare to Madison Pacific Properties?

Madison Pacific Properties (TSE:MPC) and Intermap Technologies (TSE:IMP) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Intermap Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Madison Pacific Properties. Intermap Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Madison Pacific Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Madison Pacific PropertiesC$46.79M6.04-C$41.81MC$0.529.13
Intermap TechnologiesC$7.72M9.75-C$120.05K-C$0.13N/A

Madison Pacific Properties has a beta of 0.008245, indicating that its share price is 99% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intermap Technologies has a beta of 0.143668, indicating that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Madison Pacific Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Intermap Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00

0.0% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.5% of Intermap Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 75.1% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.0% of Intermap Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Madison Pacific Properties has a net margin of 66.87% compared to Intermap Technologies' net margin of -110.18%. Madison Pacific Properties' return on equity of 7.55% beat Intermap Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Madison Pacific Properties66.87% 7.55% 1.63%
Intermap Technologies -110.18%-42.65%-20.25%

In the previous week, Intermap Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Madison Pacific Properties. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Intermap Technologies and 0 mentions for Madison Pacific Properties. Madison Pacific Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Intermap Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Madison Pacific Properties Neutral
Intermap Technologies Neutral

Summary

Madison Pacific Properties and Intermap Technologies tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intermap Technologies compare to Hemisphere Energy?

Hemisphere Energy (CVE:HME) and Intermap Technologies (TSE:IMP) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hemisphere Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Intermap Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00

Hemisphere Energy has a net margin of 30.47% compared to Intermap Technologies' net margin of -110.18%. Hemisphere Energy's return on equity of 33.26% beat Intermap Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hemisphere Energy30.47% 33.26% 27.24%
Intermap Technologies -110.18%-42.65%-20.25%

In the previous week, Hemisphere Energy and Hemisphere Energy both had 1 articles in the media. Hemisphere Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Intermap Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Hemisphere Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hemisphere Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Intermap Technologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Hemisphere Energy has a beta of 0.062062, suggesting that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intermap Technologies has a beta of 0.143668, suggesting that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

Hemisphere Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Intermap Technologies. Intermap Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hemisphere Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hemisphere EnergyC$91.93M2.68C$29.62MC$0.289.32
Intermap TechnologiesC$7.72M9.75-C$120.05K-C$0.13N/A

0.5% of Hemisphere Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.5% of Intermap Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of Hemisphere Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.0% of Intermap Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Hemisphere Energy beats Intermap Technologies on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intermap Technologies compare to Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common?

Intermap Technologies (TSE:IMP) and Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common (TSE:HAL) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

Intermap Technologies has a beta of 0.143668, suggesting that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intermap Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Intermap Technologies' net margin of -110.18%. Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common's return on equity of 0.00% beat Intermap Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intermap Technologies-110.18% -42.65% -20.25%
Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Intermap Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Intermap Technologies and 0 mentions for Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common. Intermap Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intermap Technologies Neutral
Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common Neutral

3.5% of Intermap Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 19.0% of Intermap Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Intermap Technologies.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intermap TechnologiesC$7.72M9.75-C$120.05K-C$0.13N/A
Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF CommonN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Intermap Technologies beats Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intermap Technologies compare to Enterprise Group?

Enterprise Group (TSE:E) and Intermap Technologies (TSE:IMP) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Enterprise Group presently has a consensus target price of C$1.80, suggesting a potential upside of 16.88%. Given Enterprise Group's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Enterprise Group is more favorable than Intermap Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Enterprise Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Intermap Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00

1.0% of Enterprise Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.5% of Intermap Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.6% of Enterprise Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.0% of Intermap Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Enterprise Group has a beta of 0.918302, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intermap Technologies has a beta of 0.143668, indicating that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Enterprise Group and Enterprise Group both had 1 articles in the media. Enterprise Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Intermap Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Enterprise Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Intermap Technologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Enterprise Group has a net margin of 7.79% compared to Intermap Technologies' net margin of -110.18%. Enterprise Group's return on equity of 3.39% beat Intermap Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Enterprise Group7.79% 3.39% 9.17%
Intermap Technologies -110.18%-42.65%-20.25%

Enterprise Group has higher revenue and earnings than Intermap Technologies. Intermap Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enterprise Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Enterprise GroupC$38.03M3.29C$7.94MC$0.0351.33
Intermap TechnologiesC$7.72M9.75-C$120.05K-C$0.13N/A

Summary

Enterprise Group beats Intermap Technologies on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intermap Technologies compare to IMPACT Silver?

Intermap Technologies (TSE:IMP) and IMPACT Silver (CVE:IPT) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

3.5% of Intermap Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.9% of IMPACT Silver shares are held by institutional investors. 19.0% of Intermap Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of IMPACT Silver shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Intermap Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than IMPACT Silver. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Intermap Technologies and 0 mentions for IMPACT Silver. Intermap Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled IMPACT Silver'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intermap Technologies Neutral
IMPACT Silver Neutral

Intermap Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than IMPACT Silver. IMPACT Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intermap Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intermap TechnologiesC$7.72M9.75-C$120.05K-C$0.13N/A
IMPACT SilverC$68.95M1.45-C$11.72M-C$0.01N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intermap Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
IMPACT Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

IMPACT Silver has a net margin of 1.63% compared to Intermap Technologies' net margin of -110.18%. IMPACT Silver's return on equity of 1.82% beat Intermap Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intermap Technologies-110.18% -42.65% -20.25%
IMPACT Silver 1.63%1.82%-6.79%

Intermap Technologies has a beta of 0.143668, meaning that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IMPACT Silver has a beta of 1.71592, meaning that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Intermap Technologies and IMPACT Silver tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Intermap Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IMP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IMP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IMP vs. The Competition

MetricIntermap TechnologiesSoftware IndustryComputer SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$75.26MC$5.03BC$39.25BC$12.99B
Dividend Yield1.80%4.05%3.19%6.17%
P/E Ratio-7.8527.0178.5236.32
Price / Sales9.75239.85597.889.69
Price / Cash275.0017.5345.8282.29
Price / Book3.664.299.494.45
Net Income-C$120.05KC$22.26MC$1.07BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance0.99%-0.66%-0.56%-0.38%
1 Month Performance5.15%-0.68%-1.34%-0.65%
1 Year Performance-54.46%-12.76%140.13%31.20%

Intermap Technologies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IMP
Intermap Technologies
0.0086 of 5 stars
C$1.02
-1.9%
N/A-52.8%C$75.26MC$7.72MN/A5,300
MPC
Madison Pacific Properties
N/AC$4.75
flat
N/AN/AC$282.45MC$46.79M9.1317,800
HME
Hemisphere Energy
N/AC$2.55
+1.6%
N/A+38.8%C$240.69MC$91.93M9.118
HAL
Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common
N/AC$32.53
+0.7%
N/A+43.4%C$126.67MN/AN/A45,000
E
Enterprise Group
0.541 of 5 stars
C$1.50
+0.7%
C$1.80
+20.0%
-11.5%C$121.82MC$38.03M50.0032,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:IMP) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners