Free Trial

Intermap Technologies (IMP) Competitors

Intermap Technologies logo
C$0.99 -0.06 (-5.71%)
As of 03:59 PM Eastern

IMP vs. MPC, HME, IPT, HAL, and E

Should you buy Intermap Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Intermap Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Intermap Technologies include Madison Pacific Properties (MPC), Hemisphere Energy (HME), IMPACT Silver (IPT), Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common (HAL), and Enterprise Group (E). These companies are all part of the "petroleum and natural gas" industry.

How does Intermap Technologies compare to Madison Pacific Properties?

Madison Pacific Properties (TSE:MPC) and Intermap Technologies (TSE:IMP) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Madison Pacific Properties has a beta of 0.290764, suggesting that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intermap Technologies has a beta of 0.330525, suggesting that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Intermap Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Madison Pacific Properties. Intermap Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Madison Pacific Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Madison Pacific PropertiesC$46.79M6.39-C$41.81MC$0.529.67
Intermap TechnologiesC$7.72M9.46-C$120.05K-C$0.13N/A

0.0% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.6% of Intermap Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 75.1% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.0% of Intermap Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Intermap Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Madison Pacific Properties. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Intermap Technologies and 0 mentions for Madison Pacific Properties. Madison Pacific Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Intermap Technologies' score of -0.36 indicating that Madison Pacific Properties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Madison Pacific Properties Neutral
Intermap Technologies Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Madison Pacific Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Intermap Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00

Madison Pacific Properties has a net margin of 66.87% compared to Intermap Technologies' net margin of -110.18%. Madison Pacific Properties' return on equity of 7.55% beat Intermap Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Madison Pacific Properties66.87% 7.55% 1.63%
Intermap Technologies -110.18%-42.65%-20.25%

Summary

Madison Pacific Properties beats Intermap Technologies on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intermap Technologies compare to Hemisphere Energy?

Intermap Technologies (TSE:IMP) and Hemisphere Energy (CVE:HME) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Hemisphere Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Intermap Technologies. Intermap Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hemisphere Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intermap TechnologiesC$7.72M9.46-C$120.05K-C$0.13N/A
Hemisphere EnergyC$91.93M3.07C$29.62MC$0.2810.68

Hemisphere Energy has a net margin of 30.47% compared to Intermap Technologies' net margin of -110.18%. Hemisphere Energy's return on equity of 33.26% beat Intermap Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intermap Technologies-110.18% -42.65% -20.25%
Hemisphere Energy 30.47%33.26%27.24%

3.6% of Intermap Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Hemisphere Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.0% of Intermap Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Hemisphere Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Intermap Technologies has a beta of 0.330525, indicating that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hemisphere Energy has a beta of 0.075348, indicating that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intermap Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Hemisphere Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Intermap Technologies and Intermap Technologies both had 1 articles in the media. Hemisphere Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Intermap Technologies' score of -0.36 indicating that Hemisphere Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Intermap Technologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Hemisphere Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Hemisphere Energy beats Intermap Technologies on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intermap Technologies compare to IMPACT Silver?

IMPACT Silver (CVE:IPT) and Intermap Technologies (TSE:IMP) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

IMPACT Silver has a beta of 1.497664, meaning that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intermap Technologies has a beta of 0.330525, meaning that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

IMPACT Silver has a net margin of 1.63% compared to Intermap Technologies' net margin of -110.18%. IMPACT Silver's return on equity of 1.82% beat Intermap Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
IMPACT Silver1.63% 1.82% -6.79%
Intermap Technologies -110.18%-42.65%-20.25%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
IMPACT Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Intermap Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00

Intermap Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than IMPACT Silver. IMPACT Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intermap Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IMPACT SilverC$68.95M1.73-C$11.72M-C$0.01N/A
Intermap TechnologiesC$7.72M9.46-C$120.05K-C$0.13N/A

In the previous week, Intermap Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than IMPACT Silver. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Intermap Technologies and 0 mentions for IMPACT Silver. IMPACT Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Intermap Technologies' score of -0.36 indicating that IMPACT Silver is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
IMPACT Silver Neutral
Intermap Technologies Neutral

5.6% of IMPACT Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.6% of Intermap Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of IMPACT Silver shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.0% of Intermap Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

IMPACT Silver beats Intermap Technologies on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intermap Technologies compare to Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common?

Intermap Technologies (TSE:IMP) and Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common (TSE:HAL) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intermap Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Intermap Technologies has a beta of 0.330525, suggesting that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Intermap Technologies.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intermap TechnologiesC$7.72M9.46-C$120.05K-C$0.13N/A
Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF CommonN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Intermap Technologies' net margin of -110.18%. Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common's return on equity of 0.00% beat Intermap Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intermap Technologies-110.18% -42.65% -20.25%
Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common N/A N/A N/A

3.6% of Intermap Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.0% of Intermap Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Intermap Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Intermap Technologies and 0 mentions for Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common. Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Intermap Technologies' score of -0.36 indicating that Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intermap Technologies Neutral
Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common Neutral

Summary

Intermap Technologies beats Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intermap Technologies compare to Enterprise Group?

Intermap Technologies (TSE:IMP) and Enterprise Group (TSE:E) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Intermap Technologies has a beta of 0.330525, meaning that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enterprise Group has a beta of 0.978481, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Intermap Technologies and Intermap Technologies both had 1 articles in the media. Enterprise Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Intermap Technologies' score of -0.36 indicating that Enterprise Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Intermap Technologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Enterprise Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

3.6% of Intermap Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.0% of Enterprise Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.0% of Intermap Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.6% of Enterprise Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Enterprise Group has a consensus target price of C$1.80, indicating a potential upside of 35.34%. Given Enterprise Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Enterprise Group is more favorable than Intermap Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intermap Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Enterprise Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Enterprise Group has higher revenue and earnings than Intermap Technologies. Intermap Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enterprise Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intermap TechnologiesC$7.72M9.46-C$120.05K-C$0.13N/A
Enterprise GroupC$38.03M2.84C$7.94MC$0.0344.33

Enterprise Group has a net margin of 7.79% compared to Intermap Technologies' net margin of -110.18%. Enterprise Group's return on equity of 3.39% beat Intermap Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intermap Technologies-110.18% -42.65% -20.25%
Enterprise Group 7.79%3.39%9.17%

Summary

Enterprise Group beats Intermap Technologies on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Intermap Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IMP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IMP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IMP vs. The Competition

MetricIntermap TechnologiesSoftware IndustryComputer SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$73.04MC$5.15BC$41.29BC$12.49B
Dividend Yield1.80%3.93%3.06%6.21%
P/E Ratio-7.6227.31173.0237.57
Price / Sales9.46262.92622.0211.23
Price / Cash275.0017.5053.0382.29
Price / Book3.554.4110.094.59
Net Income-C$120.05KC$22.26MC$1.06BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-8.33%9.37%3.81%0.50%
1 Month Performance-49.23%11.69%10.98%1.40%
1 Year Performance-58.05%-0.25%170.16%51.29%

Intermap Technologies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IMP
Intermap Technologies
0.0146 of 5 stars
C$0.99
-5.7%
N/A-53.7%C$73.04MC$7.72MN/A5,300
MPC
Madison Pacific Properties
N/AC$4.95
flat
N/AN/AC$294.34MC$46.79M9.5217,800
HME
Hemisphere Energy
N/AC$2.85
+0.7%
N/A+66.8%C$269.00MC$91.93M10.188
IPT
IMPACT Silver
N/AC$0.38
-1.3%
N/A+56.5%C$129.57MC$68.95MN/AN/A
HAL
Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF Common
N/AC$30.66
flat
N/A+37.1%C$123.22MN/AN/A45,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:IMP) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners