Go Pro

International Petroleum (IPCO) Competitors

International Petroleum logo
C$32.04 -0.45 (-1.39%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

IPCO vs. SCR, PSK, MEG, CPG, and TVE

Should you buy International Petroleum stock or one of its competitors? International Petroleum's main competitors and comparable companies include Strathcona Resources (SCR), PrairieSky Royalty (PSK), MEG Energy (MEG), Crescent Point Energy (CPG), and Tamarack Valley Energy (TVE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does International Petroleum compare to Strathcona Resources?

Strathcona Resources (TSE:SCR) and International Petroleum (TSE:IPCO) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Strathcona Resources has higher revenue and earnings than International Petroleum. Strathcona Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Strathcona ResourcesC$4.72B1.92C$370.36MC$3.9410.76
International PetroleumC$799.25M4.52C$69.75MC$0.19168.63

Strathcona Resources has a beta of 2.614012, indicating that its stock price is 161% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Petroleum has a beta of 0.088903, indicating that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

7.6% of Strathcona Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.6% of International Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. 91.3% of Strathcona Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 35.6% of International Petroleum shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, International Petroleum had 2 more articles in the media than Strathcona Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for International Petroleum and 0 mentions for Strathcona Resources. International Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Strathcona Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that International Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Strathcona Resources Neutral
International Petroleum Positive

Strathcona Resources currently has a consensus price target of C$43.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.46%. International Petroleum has a consensus price target of C$38.25, indicating a potential upside of 19.38%. Given International Petroleum's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe International Petroleum is more favorable than Strathcona Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Strathcona Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
International Petroleum
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Strathcona Resources has a net margin of 19.41% compared to International Petroleum's net margin of 2.81%. Strathcona Resources' return on equity of 17.02% beat International Petroleum's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Strathcona Resources19.41% 17.02% 6.81%
International Petroleum 2.81%2.33%7.72%

Summary

Strathcona Resources beats International Petroleum on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Petroleum compare to PrairieSky Royalty?

International Petroleum (TSE:IPCO) and PrairieSky Royalty (TSE:PSK) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

PrairieSky Royalty has a net margin of 44.86% compared to International Petroleum's net margin of 2.81%. PrairieSky Royalty's return on equity of 9.48% beat International Petroleum's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
International Petroleum2.81% 2.33% 7.72%
PrairieSky Royalty 44.86%9.48%5.99%

International Petroleum presently has a consensus price target of C$38.25, indicating a potential upside of 19.38%. PrairieSky Royalty has a consensus price target of C$34.42, indicating a potential downside of 1.04%. Given International Petroleum's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe International Petroleum is more favorable than PrairieSky Royalty.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
International Petroleum
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
PrairieSky Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

20.6% of International Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.7% of PrairieSky Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.6% of International Petroleum shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of PrairieSky Royalty shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

International Petroleum has a beta of 0.088903, suggesting that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PrairieSky Royalty has a beta of 0.734948, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

PrairieSky Royalty has lower revenue, but higher earnings than International Petroleum. PrairieSky Royalty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International PetroleumC$799.25M4.52C$69.75MC$0.19168.63
PrairieSky RoyaltyC$538.30M15.02C$214.83MC$1.0433.44

In the previous week, International Petroleum had 1 more articles in the media than PrairieSky Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for International Petroleum and 1 mentions for PrairieSky Royalty. PrairieSky Royalty's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat International Petroleum's score of 1.44 indicating that PrairieSky Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
International Petroleum
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PrairieSky Royalty
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

PrairieSky Royalty beats International Petroleum on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Petroleum compare to MEG Energy?

MEG Energy (TSE:MEG) and International Petroleum (TSE:IPCO) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

MEG Energy has a net margin of 13.76% compared to International Petroleum's net margin of 2.81%. MEG Energy's return on equity of 9.39% beat International Petroleum's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MEG Energy13.76% 9.39% 8.96%
International Petroleum 2.81%2.33%7.72%

MEG Energy has a beta of 0.446509, meaning that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Petroleum has a beta of 0.088903, meaning that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

MEG Energy presently has a consensus target price of C$28.00, indicating a potential downside of 9.36%. International Petroleum has a consensus target price of C$38.25, indicating a potential upside of 19.38%. Given International Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe International Petroleum is more favorable than MEG Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MEG Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
International Petroleum
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

46.2% of MEG Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.6% of International Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of MEG Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 35.6% of International Petroleum shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

MEG Energy has higher revenue and earnings than International Petroleum. MEG Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MEG EnergyC$4.63B1.70C$487.47MC$2.1114.64
International PetroleumC$799.25M4.52C$69.75MC$0.19168.63

In the previous week, International Petroleum had 1 more articles in the media than MEG Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for International Petroleum and 1 mentions for MEG Energy. International Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat MEG Energy's score of 1.08 indicating that International Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MEG Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
International Petroleum
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

MEG Energy and International Petroleum tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Petroleum compare to Crescent Point Energy?

Crescent Point Energy (TSE:CPG) and International Petroleum (TSE:IPCO) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

International Petroleum has a net margin of 2.81% compared to Crescent Point Energy's net margin of -1.65%. Crescent Point Energy's return on equity of 3.31% beat International Petroleum's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crescent Point Energy-1.65% 3.31% 2.86%
International Petroleum 2.81%2.33%7.72%

International Petroleum has a consensus price target of C$38.25, suggesting a potential upside of 19.38%. Given International Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe International Petroleum is more favorable than Crescent Point Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crescent Point Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
International Petroleum
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

47.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.6% of International Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 35.6% of International Petroleum shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, International Petroleum had 2 more articles in the media than Crescent Point Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for International Petroleum and 0 mentions for Crescent Point Energy. International Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Crescent Point Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that International Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Crescent Point Energy Neutral
International Petroleum Positive

Crescent Point Energy has higher revenue and earnings than International Petroleum. Crescent Point Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crescent Point EnergyC$3.51B0.00C$215.70MC$0.49N/A
International PetroleumC$799.25M4.52C$69.75MC$0.19168.63

Crescent Point Energy has a beta of 2.84, meaning that its share price is 184% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Petroleum has a beta of 0.088903, meaning that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

International Petroleum beats Crescent Point Energy on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Petroleum compare to Tamarack Valley Energy?

International Petroleum (TSE:IPCO) and Tamarack Valley Energy (TSE:TVE) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Tamarack Valley Energy has higher revenue and earnings than International Petroleum. International Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tamarack Valley Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International PetroleumC$799.25M4.52C$69.75MC$0.19168.63
Tamarack Valley EnergyC$1.85B3.33C$208.06MC$0.07185.14

In the previous week, International Petroleum and International Petroleum both had 2 articles in the media. International Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Tamarack Valley Energy's score of 1.15 indicating that International Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
International Petroleum
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Tamarack Valley Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

International Petroleum currently has a consensus target price of C$38.25, indicating a potential upside of 19.38%. Tamarack Valley Energy has a consensus target price of C$13.38, indicating a potential upside of 3.20%. Given International Petroleum's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe International Petroleum is more favorable than Tamarack Valley Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
International Petroleum
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Tamarack Valley Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

International Petroleum has a beta of 0.088903, meaning that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tamarack Valley Energy has a beta of 0.315643, meaning that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

20.6% of International Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.5% of Tamarack Valley Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.6% of International Petroleum shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Tamarack Valley Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

International Petroleum has a net margin of 2.81% compared to Tamarack Valley Energy's net margin of 1.50%. International Petroleum's return on equity of 2.33% beat Tamarack Valley Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
International Petroleum2.81% 2.33% 7.72%
Tamarack Valley Energy 1.50%1.34%6.55%

Summary

International Petroleum beats Tamarack Valley Energy on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get International Petroleum News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IPCO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IPCO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IPCO vs. The Competition

MetricInternational PetroleumOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$3.61BC$11.04BC$9.64BC$12.58B
Dividend YieldN/A11.35%11.59%6.20%
P/E Ratio168.6316.1719.9430.83
Price / Sales4.52435.05356.929.76
Price / Cash4.9639.6936.0982.29
Price / Book3.983.142.964.64
Net IncomeC$69.75MC$5.27BC$4.32BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance2.56%2.72%2.91%1.98%
1 Month Performance2.17%3.92%3.82%4.13%
1 Year Performance31.26%35.06%38.12%34.99%

International Petroleum Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IPCO
International Petroleum
2.5484 of 5 stars
C$32.04
-1.4%
C$38.25
+19.4%
+34.0%C$3.61BC$799.25M168.63N/A
SCR
Strathcona Resources
N/AC$39.65
+2.3%
C$43.00
+8.4%
+18.8%C$8.49BC$4.14B11.43193
PSK
PrairieSky Royalty
2.884 of 5 stars
C$33.84
+2.3%
C$34.42
+1.7%
+44.4%C$7.87BC$538.30M32.5465
MEG
MEG Energy
1.4239 of 5 stars
C$30.89
+0.7%
C$28.00
-9.4%
+17.9%C$7.86BC$4.63B14.64449
CPG
Crescent Point Energy
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$7.24BC$3.51B23.92777

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:IPCO) was last updated on 8/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners